Will Artificial Intelligence Replace Radiologists? - The Medical Futurist
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Artificial intelligence is everywhere. Let’s look at radiology. The rapid development of artificial narrow intelligence mostly in understanding images, text, and videos will have a significant impact on radiology.
But will A.I. replace them?
Join the global discussion:
Sign up: www.medicalfutu...
Like: / medicalfuturist
Follow: / berci
Browse: www.medicalfutu...
I am final year mbbs student planing to be rediologist ..but really confuse by this IR shit...
@ENGINEERING WONDERS IN A MINUTE ai will affect them not replace
By the way ai have the potential to change each jobs in engineering fields
Just check it out
Except software development every job in engineering is vulnerable
Humans will learn to live with ai
Not learn them win
You are so great that you helped me to clear my confusion. Thanks a lot.
ekg has been analysed by AI for a long time..and its just a damn LINE compared to complex medical images...but has it made cadiologists obsolete ? na...but it helps them alongside
But open ai is working on creating artificial general intelligence which can think like humans and make more accurate decision. So you have to consider that
Agreed!
I agreed to man.
Honest answer is yes it will. Bu it is probably gonna replace surgeons first.
No it Won't.. Nor the radiologists nor the surgeons..
@@Nightstar3242 It will, think AI, nanotechnology, quantum physics computers
It may not replace it in a one to one way but certainly will require much less education / training and pay for that position. Sorry protectionist piece.
engineers will be replaced first due to their simple job
Simple?
Bruh
Lmao simple job. Let me guess youre not an engineer. You probably couldn't even get by the first two years with calculus 3, physics 1, 2, 3, etc. There's absolutely nothing simple about engineering
lol I think that was a joke
So much of this sounds like what people want to hear. Last time I checked radiologists werent doctors. Isnt that the apex of what the position involves? Discernment and taking of images?
The synthetic method is more accurate. At least in the self driving sphere, you have wildly unpredictable scenarios presenting like fireworks blowing up in front of the sensor suite, but it still remains overall safer specifically on highway conditions than most drivers. Truck drivers for example or notorious for their quality, and these industries hire felons, and third worldees like you wouldnt believe unless you study it, or have at one point lived it. Ultimately its not a stretch to see city and docking situations being handled by human general intelligence, with the majority of mileage being the job of non human intelligence. With less responsibility comes a lower grade pay. I dont see how radiologists exempt from this reality beyond social discontent leading to sabotage.
The same is increasingly true of surgical interventives. With every moments passing, human intelligence and motor control, is growing smaller, and more hopelessly irrelevant. The general motion is less jobs, particularly well paying, and yet population growth. This is not a situation that any nation can avoid if it seeks to compete as empires do. Artificial intelligence is here to stay and the final frontier last shelved will be creative cognitive ability which you can correctly argue is not shared equally across populations.
Nope, they are medical professionals www.acr.org/Practice-Management-Quality-Informatics/Practice-Toolkit/Patient-Resources/About-Radiology
In theory, you should be right, but real-life/practice has not been like that yet.
They can protect their wages like they always have with artificial barriers to entry (bogus educational requirements) lobbies in Congress protecting their work and wages (you have that too, right?) and exaggerated claims about public safety as the guise.
@Chingchong Monster I couldn't agree with u more
Why do the ignorant always feel the need to type shit they have no clue about?
Medical Science isn't Maths. There are no absolutes. You've explained it beautifully.
And its weird how the comments section is trying to berate you without spending even a day working as a doctor in a hospital
Well scientists aren't dumb . Soon ai will be created which can think like humans and then which can think better than humans . For more information you can search artificial general intelligence
Thank you for sharing your opinions.
That was just a lot of feel-good talk, but I don't see what the basis for those assumptions is. Are you sure, you have an unbiased opinion on this?
If a software can (more accurately than a human) diagnose imaging and based on a vast amount of literature and data of the patient, be able to give good recommendations, on how to proceed with the patient... then what exactly can the radiologist still add with his "great knowledge, experience and eye for small details"?
I just dont see, how this profession wont be obsolote within the next 50 years, tops.
Practicing medicine is not a linear process (unfortunately). It's not like if I can measure everything about you, I can make the best decisions. I but still I do hope you are right and we can digitalize all the processes we have while diagnosing and treating for a patient. I just think we won't be able to.
AI will replace radiologists just like autopilot has replaced pilots :)
@@neuralyzer2812 i am from medical field and i know in coming 60 years or more it can't ..there are several reasons because AI will make our work faster and efficient but finally treating it will comes to us ...can you completely depend on AI when it comes to your health .. seriously say
@@shlokmishra4744 ofcourse, I totally agree. my previous comment was sarcastic. (Autopilot hasn't replaced pilots. Many used to similarly say that pilots will be replaced, but they weren't. Similar reasons apply here)
Do u have work experience in a hospital to comment on this?