The amount of humility I feel from this guy face and voice ! … subhan allah god knows best but this guy feels like how Quran describe believers .. may Allah guide him till the end ..
Because they don't know what they are arguing against and don't want to know. Because knowledge is dangerous to people who believe in unreasonable things.
There are two types of evolution chemical evolution and biological evolution. Chemical evolution assumes that on primitive earth a mixture of simple chemicals assembled into more complex molecular systems from which eventually came the first functioning cell which lead to the biological evolution which resulted in all living things through natural selection.
@@AzmatKhan-gl8mxThat's not right. What you're describing here (very simplified) is abiogenesis, a completely different scientific subject. The theory of evolution explains the emergence of biodiversity, i.e. how hereditary characteristics change within a population over generations. That has nothing to do with the origin of life. Abiogenesis and the theory of evolution are two different things.
@@JB-xc7mw abiogenesis is sometimes called chemical evolution. Dr Brown did not use the terms abiogenesis or chemical evolution because it would have just confused people. Anyway his point was that all these scientific theories do not explain where life came from and why can’t a living organism once dead be brought back to life.
@@AzmatKhan-gl8mx Sure, there's also cosmological evolution, cultural evolution, and so on. The point is that it's not within the theory of evolution. The theory of evolution explains the natural phenomenon of evolution, which is described as the change of heritable traits within a population over generations. The origin of life is not the same as the origin of species. It's simply a misrepresentation to criticize the theory of evolution based on the origin of life. That's like criticizing chemistry for being incomplete about how atoms came about. Or complaining that a cake recipe doesn't explain where the ingredients come from. It is simply not the answer to the question.
And there is a good reason for it. Theory of evolution do not speak about life origin. It is like saying that gravity is incomplete because it do not provide the récipé of chocolate cake…. Indeed…
Well yeah, saying “I don’t know” is a perfectly reasonable answer so if we find a flaw with the otherwise working theory, we won’t throw the entire idea away, only what we’ve proven to be false and then we’ll try to figure out what the truth is. Also, the reason evolution doesn’t have an answer to question of life’s origin on earth is because it doesn’t try to since it’s the theory of biodiversity. It explains how life changes and adapts over time, not how it was formed. It very well could be your god, or natural process, or even aliens. None of that would impact the fact that evolution happens. The leading theory on the origins of life is abiogenesis, however it’s still a hypothesis. A decently supported hypothesis, but still a hypothesis because it doesn’t have enough evidence to elevate it to a theory.
the thing is you can't give the creator the same attributes as the creatures, it is not something that came rather the one who created all placed. As the created places are created by the creator and all that is worldy, but not the creator, we are not the same
Science has proven that yet is a perfect answer. Actually saying I dont know doesnt change the fact that your other explanation is absurd. God of the gaps doesnt prove anything it could be Zeus aswell or Vishnu ? I would take you guys more seriously if you didnt use that fallacy every single time.😂
What? Seriously? Big bang theory and the theory of evolution are parts of atheism? 😅 Atheism is not a philosophical position. It is just the lack of belief in God. It's not a doctrine. And science is, in every situation, open to the possibility that the existing theories can be wrong. The way this man talks shows how seriously he lacks depth in his thoughts.
“But once I started believing in god I realized that the theory of aerodynamics doesn’t explain where planes come from. Clearly they come from god!” This is what religion does to your brain.
Very bad example In fact, this is what atheists say: As long as the theory of evolution exists, then we do not need a creator / As long as the laws of air dynamics exist, then we do not need an airplane maker. This is what atheism does to your brain
A plane can be repaired even after a crash, but once a living being is dead it can not be brought back to life even if all it’s organs are functional, where does that life come from?
I know this Doctor, he actually works in Madina, Saudi Arabia as an Eye Opthamologist (eye doctor)
I've went to him many times for my eye check up
O Nice
He is eye specialist or heart specialist??
Eye specialist in madina saudi
The amount of humility I feel from this guy face and voice ! … subhan allah god knows best but this guy feels like how Quran describe believers .. may Allah guide him till the end ..
Why would anyone expect the theory of evolution to explain the origin of life?
Because they don't know what they are arguing against and don't want to know.
Because knowledge is dangerous to people who believe in unreasonable things.
There are two types of evolution chemical evolution and biological evolution. Chemical evolution assumes that on primitive earth a mixture of simple chemicals assembled into more complex molecular systems from which eventually came the first functioning cell which lead to the biological evolution which resulted in all living things through natural selection.
@@AzmatKhan-gl8mxThat's not right. What you're describing here (very simplified) is abiogenesis, a completely different scientific subject. The theory of evolution explains the emergence of biodiversity, i.e. how hereditary characteristics change within a population over generations. That has nothing to do with the origin of life. Abiogenesis and the theory of evolution are two different things.
@@JB-xc7mw abiogenesis is sometimes called chemical evolution. Dr Brown did not use the terms abiogenesis or chemical evolution because it would have just confused people. Anyway his point was that all these scientific theories do not explain where life came from and why can’t a living organism once dead be brought back to life.
@@AzmatKhan-gl8mx Sure, there's also cosmological evolution, cultural evolution, and so on. The point is that it's not within the theory of evolution. The theory of evolution explains the natural phenomenon of evolution, which is described as the change of heritable traits within a population over generations. The origin of life is not the same as the origin of species. It's simply a misrepresentation to criticize the theory of evolution based on the origin of life. That's like criticizing chemistry for being incomplete about how atoms came about. Or complaining that a cake recipe doesn't explain where the ingredients come from. It is simply not the answer to the question.
A good explanation of "science of the gaps" or even "anything but god, of the gaps"
La ilaha illAllah ☝🏻🌹
Theory of evolution explains how life evolved if a theory tells where life came from then it will be a theory of origin or theory of life
And there is a good reason for it. Theory of evolution do not speak about life origin.
It is like saying that gravity is incomplete because it do not provide the récipé of chocolate cake…. Indeed…
Evolution doesn’t explain the origin of life because that isn't what it tries to do. Look to abiogenesis to learn about that.
May Allah bless you
Well yeah, saying “I don’t know” is a perfectly reasonable answer so if we find a flaw with the otherwise working theory, we won’t throw the entire idea away, only what we’ve proven to be false and then we’ll try to figure out what the truth is. Also, the reason evolution doesn’t have an answer to question of life’s origin on earth is because it doesn’t try to since it’s the theory of biodiversity. It explains how life changes and adapts over time, not how it was formed. It very well could be your god, or natural process, or even aliens. None of that would impact the fact that evolution happens. The leading theory on the origins of life is abiogenesis, however it’s still a hypothesis. A decently supported hypothesis, but still a hypothesis because it doesn’t have enough evidence to elevate it to a theory.
if you need somewhere for life to come from, where it comes needs a place to come too
the thing is you can't give the creator the same attributes as the creatures, it is not something that came rather the one who created all placed. As the created places are created by the creator and all that is worldy, but not the creator, we are not the same
you heard that from someone else
good repeating 👏👏👏
Exactly something can not come from nothing except for the Big Bang which resulted in all the matter in the universe from nothing.
That’s right something can not come from nothing, except for the Big Bang which resulted in all the matter in the universe from nothing.
That’s right something can not come from nothing except for the Big Bang which resulted in all the matter in the universe from nothing.
Science has proven that yet is a perfect answer. Actually saying I dont know doesnt change the fact that your other explanation is absurd.
God of the gaps doesnt prove anything it could be Zeus aswell or Vishnu ?
I would take you guys more seriously if you didnt use that fallacy every single time.😂
What? Seriously? Big bang theory and the theory of evolution are parts of atheism? 😅 Atheism is not a philosophical position. It is just the lack of belief in God. It's not a doctrine. And science is, in every situation, open to the possibility that the existing theories can be wrong. The way this man talks shows how seriously he lacks depth in his thoughts.
“But once I started believing in god I realized that the theory of aerodynamics doesn’t explain where planes come from. Clearly they come from god!”
This is what religion does to your brain.
😂
Very bad example
In fact, this is what atheists say: As long as the theory of evolution exists, then we do not need a creator / As long as the laws of air dynamics exist, then we do not need an airplane maker. This is what atheism does to your brain
A plane can be repaired even after a crash, but once a living being is dead it can not be brought back to life even if all it’s organs are functional, where does that life come from?
@@AzmatKhan-gl8mxtotaly agreed
''Nice, blaming religion for a person's personal opinion''
This is what being a possible non-believer does to your brain.
Us there an apeman we came from? Any proof? No.
Asalmuailkum plz can I get email of Dr Brown plzzz,it is urgent