Feminists Are Now Complaining About the Problems They Created
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.พ. 2022
- This video is a response to a CNBC documentary on Childcare.
Support This Channel
Paypal Donate:
www.paypal.me/TBYSDONATE
SubscribeStar:
www.subscribestar.com/think-b...
Patreon:
/ thinkbeforeyousleep
Odysee:
odysee.com/@ThinkBeforeYouSle...
Twitter:
/ tbystweet
Minds:
www.minds.com/thinkbeforeyous...
Gab:
gab.com/ThinkBeforeYouSleep
Rumble:
rumble.com/c/ThinkBeforeYouSleep
Video Links:
CNBC Why Daycare Is So Expensive: • Why Daycare Is So Expe...
Infomercial Fails: • Infomercial Montage [F...
SNL "Don't Buy Stuff You Cannot Afford:" • Don't Buy Stuff - Satu...
Vox "Do I want Kids:" • Do I Want Kids?
Article Links:
Market Rates for Childcare in CA: www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/re/caqpa...
Market Rates for Childcare in New York: www.dccnyinc.org/families/wha... - บันเทิง
![[Live] : ONE 167 วันนี้!! "ตะวันฉาย vs โจ"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/D9_dvfIa6Ao/mqdefault.jpg)
I really appreciate the astonishing amount of people in the comments section of this video who are offended that NBC said "the government pays for." You are right. The government pays for nothing. The taxpayers are the ones who fund everything. Most of the time involuntarily. Well, lets be honest, even the future stoolies don't like paying taxes which is why they are always yelling at billionaires to pay instead of leading by example by offering to pay more of their money first. So it's probably involuntarily 99% of the time; with the exception of a few celebrities who are probably mostly liars. I don't see Hasan "Cenk's Nephew" Piker offering 90% of his multi-million dollar salary to the public welfare. This is why when I talk about this stuff in videos or community posts I make sure I say taxpayers not government when it comes to public services. I don't want to give people the impression that the government pays for anything like the communists do.
And this right here is exactly why you are so loved and supported.
The reason why countries with low birthrates have big childcare expenses is because the government tries to incentivise having more children to counter low birthrates. The problem in those countries is that people focus too much on their career etc. and can't or don't want to afford children. Thus something needs to be done to increase fertility rates. Otherwise those countries won't survive the next century. The US doesn't have that low birthrates thus it is not required to have subsidies from the government. Not because the gov. wants to create a communist utopia.
Noone goes: "Oh the government pays for my childs expenses now? Then I am not having children!"🙍♂️
You reversed causation and consequence in this problem.
@@dragonlord1225 I wasn't implying causation. I was saying that their conclusion was untrue based on the data they provided.
@@ThinkBeforeYouSleepYT But the conclusion that government support increases birthrate is true. The economic limitations of course aren't the only variable that plays a part to why people don't have children, which is why gov. support alone won't solve the problem, but it still helps increase the birthrates. Most incentives aren't done by direct monetary support but by discounts on public transport, tax reliefs etc. anyways.
@@dragonlord1225 As I said, that was not the point of my argument. The point was that their evidence did not support the argument they are making.
I'm not even sure where the disagreement is here because you aren't even primarily arguing for socialism. Tax reliefs aren't socialism. Can you see how that is a different philosophical mechanism entirely? One is you earn your own money and they say, "We aren't going to steal as much from you." The other is, "You don't have to work hard because we are going to pay for it for you." That philosophical difference in how the money is obtained or kept is important.
I find it ironic she's starting a mom business, yet she herself isn't being a mom to her own kids.
That should be everyone's first questionn.
Haha🤣🤣🤣
It blows the mind 🤯
the socialist government is the new feminist husband. dead beat wives cant keep a man
True😂
She needed to birth her own children as a prerequisite for the business
"My husband's net income is about $65,000 a year."
"Rent is $5,000 a month."
Not even factoring in childcare, did nobody do any back-of-the-envelope calculations before she quit her job?
I just love how she's unemployed and still has her kids in daycare
@@N1korasu Isn't it wonderful.
Women are grown children and have no sense of direction.
Great debt slaves. The banks love those.
@@sandlotscout6358 That’s not a woman. A woman knows her place. This is another example of entitlement.
It's insane that she didn't even consider taking care of her own kids when it's that expensive and she makes no money.
But you don't understand, she would have to spend time with them
Guarantee you that Beta husband won't put his foot down and force her to watch the kids. It's too important that she has a "career."
Some people want to keep their free time. My mom would put me in any program that was free because she saw it as a free day care. From summer school, even if I was passing she would sign me up, or after school programs, recreational park services on the weekends. She just didn't want us at home. Meanwhile my dad was working 3 jobs. She was probably cheating on my dad.
The issue is in the past few years there’s many men who will watch their women do all the care and not even help so it’s a 24hour job which is inhumane and they will still complain that they live off him financially even tho she works 24/7 caring and everything. It’s not been a fair sitting men could be more helpful this will all work women can be home makers and carers
@@Literallyarealhuman24/7 works? Are you insane? That applies go newborn babies. The older they get, the less time you have to spend on feeding and changing their diapers. 3 years old and they get potty trained.
Have you cared for children?
So she “works” a job that pays nothing, a salary of precisely ZERO, then her husband pays about $60k a year in daycare. Has it not ONCE occurred to them that if she took care of the kids instead she would be saving $60k A YEAR??? Either they are both unbelievably stupid or the mum cant be bothered taking care of her own kids
She could literally start her own daycare. She has her first 3 clients.
That was exactly what my mom did all the way up until we moved and settled in to Colorado.
But then she would have to actually work.
I hope this commentsection here aint gonna swept-up in generalizing and/or cherry-picking dumb Feminists. Some of the most educated and well-spoken People online identify as Femisnts, like Emma Thorne and Illuminaghtii. Also, have you seen Hbomberguys video 'Antifeminism VS FACTS'?
She’d be making 5k a month just watching 3 kids lmao
The user reviews would likely be very poor though
The government doesn't pay for anything in any country, the taxpayer does.
@CZsWorld I didn't expect to see you here on this channel haha.
Damn I guess everyone is learning about female nature and feminist society even you CZsWorld love your videos by the way keep it up
I knew I liked you for a reason.
the socialist government is the new feminist husband. dead beat wives cant keep a man
exactly, and to think some people still don't know that. smdh
"I pay 5000 dollars for child care".... "We can't afford that" Love how she takes responsibility but shifts blame of lack of funds onto herself and her husband
I think it's easier to call her an idiot. 🤷🏼♂️
" *I* pay" (*not her money)
_When it comes to responsibility_
" *We* can't afford"
I get the impression she does pay. I have a feeling she used to make bank before having kids. SHe was a lobbyist sellout. They make bank. THe top earners of lobbyists can make over a million a year.I doubt she made THAT much, but even if she made a quarter of that, I bet she has a very nice nest egg. Let's say she saved/invested 24k a year for the 12-15 years she was working prior to having kids let's say she got 6%, after 12 years she would have $464,188.33 saved. These are conservative estimates.
They probably keep their finances seperate, and she is using all of her savings to pay for childcare. Since it's HER money, her husband can't say boo. This is why married couples who keep seperate finances are less wealthy than those who combine their income/savings/investments. THe reason couples who seperate money like this is because there is no communication about what is actually going on about the finances. As long as the bills get paid, from the joint household account and there is a joint emergency fund this is all they are concerned about. Couples who don't share finances miss out out investment opportunities, and may be unknowingly paying more money in interest rates etc. It sounds like they need a financial planner and they need to go together. Honestly, she should have purchased an place in New Jersey with cash with her nest egg, he could commute by train, she could stay home and work on her business part time, and this couple would be much better off living off 5k a month, without a mortgage. Even if they lived off $4k and saved $1k they would be infinitely better off.
Just because she made a lot of money in the past, it doesn't mean she is financially literate. In the past she probably had money leftover at the end of the month, someone told her she should invest, so she hired someone to invest for her. THe husband is also definitely financially illiterate. She probably pays for childcare, and the living expenses out of her savings, and he pays for rent with his whole income. In the meantime, they are saving nothing. She has probably convinced her husband and herself that if they sacrifice and pay for childcare now, while she works on her business, it will MORE than pay for itself in the future. Now is this true? Probably not. But she keeps hoping. He might believe it too and since it doesn't really affect his life too much, he doesn't say anything or think too much about it. I noticed he was missing from this "expose." He might even be under the impression her business is making money. He might have never thought to ask.
How do I know she is paying for at least some of the living expenses too?
He earns 65k a year after taxes. THeir rent is 5k a month. There is no way, they are living on $5k a year or $416/m to cover utilities, groceries, clothing, internet, phone bills, entertainment, transportation, etc. It's actually hard to get THAT much credit. He is using his whole paycheck and she is using her savings to pay for living expenses.
My dad babysat our oldest because I was just starting my accounting career when she was born and I had to go back to work 2 weeks after I had her. It was awful being away from my baby and when I researched daycares, I was horrified by the idea of sending my kids to be raised by someone else. My husband and I decided I would stay home with our kids instead. It was worth the income cut all day long
This lady is literally destroying the future of her family because she wants to manifest the working, successful , empowered female stereotype.
Or to just get them out of her hair while she screws with Chad in her poor betabuxxer shmuck's home.
$10,000k a month? That is a yearly cost with 2 kids in most places. You are making terrible choices. If you need to live in New York, you can't be wasting your money making time doing a pet project that pays you nothing and will most likely never pay you anything. Move somewhere cheaper and/or go get a paying job. It really is that simple. You are spending $60k a year on a place to live and $60k on daycare. You are going broke. You can get a cheaper place in New York to live (like Brooklyn) and cut at least $2k off your monthly budget. Then either you stay at home with the kids and forego daycare (saving the $5k a month) OR you go get a job that pays more than $60k a year after taxes to make paying that cost worth it. You could also look into cheaper daycare. There are Catholic daycares in Brooklyn that are far less expensive. You shouldn't have to spend more than $5k a month total for housing and daycare in Brooklyn or Queens. Hell, Jersey City is probably cheaper too.
Now, if you don't want your kids living on the street, get on that right now. You can hardly afford to continue on your current path. Be smarter with your money. Be realistic about the life you can actually afford. Stop doing stupid things.
exactly, shes creating the image of a sucessful entrepreneur living in manhattan but shes really unemployed, leeching off her husband, and has a negative 1/1 spending ratio.
Yup. Look at the bright side. The boys are gonna grow up to be simpy push overs without a father figure. The girls will grow to be male hating feminists and the cycle will continue.
If she want to manifest that then there are a classic career path that includes all that. Housewife.
Being a full time volunteer while needing near full time child care is incredibly irresponsible.
@John Arch 🤣🤣 feminism is full time volunteering. I'm a use that.
It's incredibly self indulgent
I'm still wrapping my brain around someone willing to bang that uh, woman? There is like zero upside in this deal.
@Ben Dover the left doesn't know what "personal responsibility" means.
No doubt her weak bellied husband can't control her crap.
She literally could save/earn 5k a month by just taking care of her own goddamn children 😂
That's about as much as he makes after taxes 🤦♂
"What kind of sick world do we live in where parent sraise their own kids" had me rolling
What I really don't understand is if their kids are gonna be in daycare all day anyway, then why didn't she keep her (I assume) high paying job? They chose the worst of both worlds
@@radhiadeedou8286*"They"*
No Her husband earns 65k, it's her
@@stevewilson4718 its his fault as well for being stupid enough to go along with it
We homeschool, and nothing has made me more sure that my wife and I made the smart choice than the last 4 years. She has her own mind, knows when she's being peddled BS, and most of her friends are soo clueless and absent minded it pisses her off. She may not have tons of friends or get to go to parties, but she is MILES more mature than other people her age.
Imagine how ridiculous this would be if it weren’t childcare
“I work a night job where I make no money, so I hire a professional chef to cook a four-course dinner for my children, which costs me $5,000 a month.”
Using children as human shields has been the calling card of all parasites.
I volunteer as a butterfly breeder but I don't have a car so it costs me 5k a month in limo services. It's so hard to make it in New York.
the socialist government is the new feminist husband. dead beat wives cant keep a man
She spends 167 dollars a day in childcare, or 55 dollars per child.
She doesn't work and wants a lavish celebrity lifestyle a extremely delusional materialistic modern woman that qont contribute or reciprocate her husband's efforts
I was a single dad to my daughter and I raised her on a $42k net per year salary. There is NO assistance for a male from any organization! I was even able to pay for her college. Suck it up! This disgusts me.
I have seen a lot and heard a lot about this, and it seems that single dads are FAR better than single moms.
How is your daughter doing in life?
This is garbage. I am also a single dad. You qualify for the same government assistance a woman does if you make below a certain income.
@@CEWIII9873 would not suprise me since being a single dad is much harder just getting custody(outside of partners dieing which applies more generally) so if the dad can get costody they have to be the best dad to ever exist
@@captainnutsack8151 he was making 20 grand too much nice try
@@Redlegfo Yeah and the income had nothing to do with gender, is my point. There is only one thing that affects how much government assistance one can receive... that's your income. Nothing else.
I worked third shift when my children were small, I would do doubles on the weekends, essentially get my hours in 2 days, it worked for about 20 years!! Never paid a dime for daycare!! We raised our kids.
"Child care, to me, partially is amazing and wonderful and I found the perfect situation for my family and my children."
If it's making you run out of money, it's not perfect.
It's always satisfying knowing that all of these issues comes down to a few basic problems in our culture: 1) Bad parenting and 2) Adults refusing to grow up. God bless!
And democrats of course
💯
No responsibility.go figure.lol..let it burn.
Precisely. No stable foundation + a society that’s only encouraging people to not grow up and remain heavily deluded.
Isn't that really just one problem? Bad parenting.
Young girl to her daddy : "when I grow up I wanna be a feminist "
Daddy to his daughter : "pick one because you can't be both"
ayoooo
These are some possible red flags I've noticed in certain women for a while now. If you're looking for a good partner for a stable, healthy relationship filled with peace of mind or just curious, this could be worth a read:
1. Long (fake) nails
2. Fake hair (~long and/or bright colored)
3. Makeup (mostly heavy makeup)
4. Big earrings
5. Provocative clothing
6. Very active on social media (attention seeking content; thirst trap antics, etc.)
7. Questionable.. questions (e.g. "Babe, would you date me if I were a worm", "babe do you think I'm pretty"..)
8. Tattoos/body mods/piercings (especially in weird places)
9. Most/all of her friends are male.
10. Promiscuous or Using se>< as a proxy for feeling loved and adored (this can be especially true for people who struggle with attachment issues/daddy issues)
11. S.I.G.N language (Shaming, Insult, Guilting & Need to be right)
12. Herd mentality/No sign of individualism (follows beauty standards, fashion trends, body ideals, bad friends or other trends without questioning or reflecting on their reason[s] for doing so) [often correlates with No. 2, 3 & 5]
13. Spoilt brat-like/elitist behaviour (e.g. people who refer to themselves as "bad b*tches", claim to have "very high standards" or are "high maintenance" ) [often correlates with No. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5]
14. Materialistic [often correlates with No. 12 & 13]
15. Their actions don't follow their words (cognitive dissonance)
16. No sense of boundaries
17. Uses past events or personal information you gave when you 'opened up' to them, as ammunition against you during fights or quarrels.
18. Clingy, jealous or possessive (e.g. not being allowed to have any female friends)
19. Frequent quarrels over trivial things--it seems some people think toxicity makes relationships more 'fun or exciting' (or even straight up admit they enjoy toxicity in relationships)
20. Habit of lying (shouldn't be ignored [along with No. 7, 14 & 16] as it could escalate over time [often correlates with No. 10, 11, 13 & 15. Possibly with No. 6] )
21. Has a tiny, little girl/baby-like voice (possibly due to trauma or abuse at a young age [Reference: Dr. Drew Pinsky - Loveline] )
22. Expects you to 'mind-read' their thoughts and/or 'hints'--- (Quora; Do women expect men to be mind-readers?)
*Their mentality of dependence and expectations is so high they use emotions to smoke screen this shameful behaviour. [Shouldn't be ignored. Could correlate with No. 19]
23. Sh*t Tests---"used to determine your frame. Frame is a concept which essentially means 'composure and self-control.” (shouldn't be ignored; usually continues indefinitely, may escalate over time [Often correlates with No. 11, 16 & 19. Possibly with No. 7 & 17] )
24. Ultimatums (could correlate with No. 13, 16 & 18)
25. Can't/doesn't take 'No' for an answer (Strongly correlates with No. 16, possibly with No. 11 & 18 [Shouldn't be ignored; possible sign of an abusive person, may lead to tantrums, physical assault or other 'crazy' behaviours] )
26. Comes from a broken/toxic/abusive home and/or lacks (proper) parental figure(s). (Often correlates with No. 4, 6, 8, 10, 16, 19, 20 [compulsive or pathological lying] & 21)
*The issue is simply not just coming from aforementioned homes, but many don't seek professional help and/or properly work on themselves so they carry that mental/emotional baggage into their relationships.
27. They're often passive aggressive (Could correlate with No. 22. Possibly with No. 7, 11, 19 & 25)
A link to my book, if you're curious:
www.amazon.com/dp/B09PJGWWY8
CONTINUATION BELOW
28. Bisexual ("People with loose sexual boundaries like bisexuality, polyamory & pansexuality- sexualities where they can't really declare a major or stick to a specific type tend to be trauma survivors*." [*May correlate with No. 26] )
29. Exhibits 'infantile/neotenic' behaviours when in need of aid (e.g. using a childlike voice* and speech pattern, acting "cute", naive; sometimes with a 'sensual' undertone - often used to avoid accountability, responsibility or get their way) [*Not to be confused with No. 21; this one (29) is intentional while No. 21 is 'involuntary'] [Could correlate with No. 10 & 25. Likely with No. 16] )
30. Frequent mood swings-- could be 'preemptively' identified with certain comments e.g. "Having someone who can handle your mood swings is such a blessing", "Need a man that can handle me (when I'm mad, act crazy..)" [Correlates with No. 19. Possibly with No. 13, 17, 18, 22, 23 & 25]
31. Really into astrology (has their personality, behaviours or actions based on zodiac signs) 32. Being "Free-spirited"; 'Hippie' or 'Gypsy-like'. (Could correlate with No. 8, 10 & 26. Possibly with No. 28)
33. Often/always plays the victim-- "When you're so used to playing the victim you don't realise when you're being the villain." (Often correlates with No. 15, 20 & 29. Possibly with No. 6, 10, 11, 16 & 17)
For those who are perplexed about No. 1-5, google search for images of Saweetie or blac chyna or sumn idk
These flags could be a result of insecurities, emotional and/or mental immaturity, childhood emotional neglect, attention/validation seeking, attachment issues, etc.
Observing people's personalities, character and behaviours rather than focusing on their 'physical attractiveness' is a good way to overcome the halo effect.
Also, like attracts like, so make sure to be self-aware and reflect on your actions/behaviour to grow and mature as a person. And be compassionate to others as you'd be to yourself.
These are just my observations & opinions and should be held up to scrutiny.
🤣🤣🤣 got em
Gold.
Like many lower middle class families, our kids hit the age where it cost more for daycare and other expenses than I could earn by working. With daycare, grabbing premade dinners because I was too tired to cook, and the gasoline back and forth to work, etc it came to the point where it wasn't worth it. So we did what so many young couples do. We cut back on expenses as much as we could and I stayed home with our children. I made the home my full time job. Finding ways to live frugally was a big part of that. If I could save a dollar by doing something myself, I did it. This is reality when you have children.
I'm proud to say that I helped dozens of other women stay home with their kids (where they wanted to be) in my time as a homemaker. Once I broke down the math, they were stunned to realize that they were paying to work, and within a month, they'd be happy housewives.
There was one that baffled me. Not only was she paying to work, but her kids were really struggling in the school system. She had two of the kids on powerful psych meds and one had already had a total nervous breakdown from bullying. Nobody was healthy because all they ate was fast junkfood - including mom and dad. She bitched and moaned nonstop about the plight of her family. I'd show her how she could fix all of this by staying home, by homeschooling her kids and getting them out of a bad environment, and by cooking healthy meals for her family. More complaining, but she never DID anything to resolve the problems. I finally asked her why. She paused, thought about it for a moment, then blandly said, "I don't want to. If I had to spend all day with my kids, I'd hate them. Besides, I love my job."
This is when I realized that I was dealing with a total narcissist. She wanted the attention from the problems, but didn't want to take responsibility for any of it. She'd let her kids be psychologically damaged for life before she put any effort into them. I've never been more disgusted by a mother.
Every other woman acted like she'd been liberated from slavery by coming home, even if it meant downsizing her lifestyle. The husbands were thrilled to have a happy wife, a clean and organized home, and a hot dinner. Children thrived by having one full time caretaker.
If this woman is working for no money and bitching about an outrageous daycare bill, she's got a serious problem. She's doing all of this to herself and if you force her to boil it down, I'll be she says something about how fulfilling her career is. She's making irrational decisions, but she's got her reasons for it. And I promise you, those reasons are selfish.
Based and mompilled.
I bet her husband doesn't have the balls to tell her she needs to quite trying her failed start up career and just take care of the kids. This is like watching a training wreck with zero accountability.
From the first second I could already tell she must be the one pulling the ‘strings’ without even seeing the husband lol. I bet she gets batshit insane screaming when things don’t go her way. I had a co-worker just like that and all I did was calmly ask question that blew her cover getting her frustrated in front of everyone 😂😂😂
So she is paying $5000 a month for child care so she can work at a job that pays her nothing?
Makes sense
Probably never learned how to balance a check book either.
the fact that rent alone is basically all of their income should be getting them thinking by it self let alone that childcare is not that much less than yearly rent
she can possibly balance a check book on her head while walking... maybe
Can see the dollar signs in her eyes. spend spend spend.
She can’t swallow her pride to recognize and act on the fact that she, specifically in her situation, has better purpose and value as a stay-at-home mother rather than an unsuccessful entrepreneur.
Does daycare constitute child care? if so, What fucking daycare has you pay 5,000 a month? I get if it's $175 per week, cause that's how my mum's daycare that she works at does it. And per month that's around $700. That woman is practically getting scammed at this point.
_We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality._
_Reality is often disappointing._
Exactly this. “I got a problem here, Lord… I wanna put my finger in the fire, but without having it burned... What can you do for me?”
The overgrown welfare systems and the marxistic ideas behind that are in most cases trying to achive exact that to avoid/evade reality.
Thats why not even you in the US have a capitalistic system or it is mostly overruled by rules set up by the government but at least you have more freedom then I have in my country at least in the non democrates states - which is ironically as f--k.
Someone is a fan of Ayn Rand. Her quotation was -
You can avoid reality. But you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.
Amen!
What I find ironic is that people have no choice to make kids or not. It "just happens" 😅 and only then they start to think how will be provide their kids with food, edducation e.t.c. First make fire themselves and then shouting -"Oh no! Fire! How did this happenned? What we gonna do now?" Brain usage is adviceble.
LOL 😂😂😂
The last people who understood "can not afford" are going in the ground now. Everyone needs to start with acknowledging that when you have a dry place to sleep and enough to eat, you have everything you need. Anything else is luxury.
“The government foots most of the bill.”
They always seem to leave out where the government gets the money they’re using to foot that bill.
Right? Its infuriating. They phrase it like it costs you nothing, but it costs everyone more. More government services, the higher your taxes.
They just magic it up out of nowhere. It's all digital on a screen and backed by nothing. Modern Monetary Theory says they spend it into existence and tax it away to offset inflation. They can make as much as they want so long as they find a way to tax it back out of existence to prevent the devaluation of their currency.
I think Sweden has like a 60% average income tax or something like that. Maybe it was corporate tax. Either way, it's not cheap.
They treat government like a God that remains unquestioned.
@@sol-hunter2332 Just like females want the males to support their dreams financially and emotionally, they expect the gov't to help out also as if the gov't OWE them something.
Rebecca tried to have a business about motherhood while having her kids in daycare - peak irony
peak stupidity*
That's the first thing I said when I heard that. I was like what?
That life model seems like
"How to look like a good mother while refusing to be a mother"
Her business should've been about childcare 😂
Could i get the link of your profile pic ? ,it looks good lol
Watching your videos from an eastern europe. It feels surreal to learn people can get away with such retarded live choices and receive compassion like they are not the one completely responsible for their life
“Most new ideas suck.” Fantastic summation.
I just don’t understand why she’s paying for childcare if she doesn’t have a job
Because she's a strong independent business woman
Lazy freeloader
She literally just needs an excuse to stay home without seeming like she’s part of the gender norms. Because if she did stay home with the kids she would be too busy taking care of them all day and she would look like your normal mom which is too toxic and problematic for these empowered women.
@@masterbeef981 minus the business....
And independent....
And strong....
Thank you, finally someone call her out on her bs lmao
so she could save 5000$ a month by just being a stay at home mom?
She must really not like her kids.
No it's just the usual "Motherhood is degrading to modern women"
nah the 5k a month seemed like a fabrication to push a narrative. though socialized child creche may be a good idea. not against it... but what if you dont have children? do you get taxed for it? if you dont have a car then you still pay for roads because of externalities. hm. ok nah fucc socialized child care. the lowest minimum support like publicly funded orphanages may be the way to go
I doubt her business is going to earn her more.
She's an awful person and this man failed at choosing a wife
@@strangelyukrainian7314 yeah that cuts off one more person to care for because that's cutting like 15k a year on feeding, clothing, and medically caring for the person at that point I don't understand why the husband even married her when she brings nothing to their relationship
Btw hiring a babysitter Full-time for $20 an hour still only costs $3200 a month
I had my first child in January 2015 when we lived in Downtown Manhattan and back then a place in a nursery chain like Bright Horizons went for $3500 for the first child and $3300 for the sibling. Going salaries for a nanny of one child were at min $20 per hour plus medical insurance coverage, sick days, maternity leave and pension contributions. The numbers were absolutely insane but that’s what was required by law. I often wonder where all these averages come from that you’ve shown. In the cities themselves the costs are insane, perhaps the costs in the suburbs are so much lower that the averages and means look the way they do. I’d say $5k for 3 kids in 2019 was a steal.
I find it so funny that Rebecca kept saying "we" can't afford things when "she" doesn't generate any income for the family.
And to imagine that they would be better off financially if she just gave up on her unfeasible business project and became stay at home mom instead of shelling out five grand a month on daycare.
I wondered when I clicked on this episode how the "modern feminist" movement would play into it. I was expecting a story about a single mother with a career trying to shuffle babies from multiple baby daddies.
So what did I get out of it instead? A story about a woman who can't see the obvious.
One, she needed to stop having kids after the first one because they couldn't afford even the first one.
Second, when you are working outside of the home and make no money from it and it is likely costing you money to deal with that "business" it is time to give up the business. You chock it up as an expensive hobby that didn't go anywhere and you then save that money by staying home, raising the kids, and cutting your expenses.
Three, even with cutting expenses, and pulling the horde of kids out of day care and being raised by Mom, you still are going to come up short. Dad needs a second job. And you need to consider moving to a lower cost of living area. And when I hear a household's income is tied directly to the bread winner working for a non-profit ... that is one bad PR incident away from being out of work.
Four, the hubby is a simp. She makes all of the decisions and her decision making is irrational as hell. With three kids, and her having no income he is scared poop less that she will divorce him, get custody of all the kids, and drain him dry in child support. He will be that guy making six figures a year and driving a 20 year old Ford Focus and the ex-wife is still crying for more money.
I have no sympathy for this guy. He walked head first right into this fiasco.
While single handedly being the biggest expense.
@@superdave8248 the only thing I disagree with is the part where you said "they can't afford kids" because they can....easily. She just CHOOSES to send them to toddler Harvard because she's a snooty moron. 60K after taxes is plenty to raise 3 kids.
@@jerometruitt2731 Not in this case. After taxes the guy clears $65k a year. Their rent/mortgage is $5k a month. That leaves just $5k for all their other expenses. They straight up can't afford those kids. Not in the area at least they are living at. The solution is to not have kids and both work jobs that bring in income. Odds are between the two of them working they were probably clearing $100k a year after taxes. They were living in a small less expensive home. Utilities and food were less expensive. Hell, even their choice of vehicles was probably less expensive.
As soon as she popped out kid number one she was probably already leaning toward being a stay at home mom. Then she got tired of that. Popped out kid number two and wanted to do a home business so she could work, make money, and still raise the kids. Then she popped out kid number three. And now it is day care for the kids so she can focus on a home business they is probably costing them money to operate.
No, the solution would have been for her not to quit her job, have just one child, and stop trying to live a life style their below average household income for NYC can afford.
It's like she's allergic to spending time with her kids, if she can't afford sending them to daycare, why not be a stay at home mother? Oh right, its probably because she doesn't want to. What a "great" mother.
And she wants to "advise" and teach other "mothers" for her business. LOL
She should never ha e been a mother... Appealing exuse for a woman!
yeah she feels more empowered making no money leading a "Moms meetup" group- which really just sounds like a baby mamma support group
She could be a stay at home mom for a whole year and check how much she saves (from the husband's income).
Also, get this, she would know how to take care of children and could charge to take care of one of the neighbors' for a fraction of what a professional caretaker would!
She would change money spending into earning. WOW!
She wants to live some richbitch sex in the city lifestyle at everyone else's expense.
Years ago my job evaporated while off on a protected leave (compassionate care leave for my dying father) and my now ex and I agreed that I could not earn more with the jobs available than our childcare costs, she had a safe well paid job in healthcare, we decided that I would be stay at home parent. I did it for 2 years, and it was a great experience, I also found it to be the easiest job I have ever had, not this unbelievably trying job that stay at home mothers make it out to be, of course when I say that, stay at home and single mothers insist I couldn’t possibly have been doing it correctly, because it didn’t fit the narrative!
The lady didn't even consider for one moment ditching her unprofitable business, raising her own children, and living off her husband's 6 figure salary.
She could save them 5k a month by just raising their three kids herself. Paying that much themselves is insane and expected tax payers to subsidize that much is batshit insane.
She is paying that much because she doesn't want to raise her kids.
RIGHT! As soon as I saw the amount of money they put in to daycare I was like put the business on hold till your kids are in school and watch them yourself.
She claims to pay 5000 for the daycare. She does not pay 5000 for the daycare.
@@SporkyMcFly I looked up the place shown in the doc: Manhattan kids club.
They went out of Business (what a shock) but they used to charge:
$248/week for the full week.
x3 $744/week.
X4 $2976/month for all 3 kids.
Where was the other $2024 going?
Also lol, checking out the reviews from former employee's this place was a pretty much a slave market most of the employee's were unlicensed students trying to get experience whilst studying for a childcare degree and those running the place apparently didn't give two shits. (or if you believe the 5-4 star reviews they were great, they really knew how to run a school, did i mention they were great?)
If that woman has so much faith in government programs, why not send her kids to government subsidised child care instead of the rich kids club?
Excellent point!
@@llIllIlI You can't be serious! Raise her own kids? That's insane!
I know this is an old video, but I love your videos! It’s nice to see that there’syputubers who post stuff like this! It’s honestly so true and I agree
WHO IS GOING TO PAY FOR ALL OF THESE KIDS I HAD!!
I’m genuinely confused-she’s literally a stay-at-home mom, why are they going into debt to pay for childcare? What?
Only adults are capable of raising children.
she's not the smartest woman alive
@@craigime she's an npc. Animated, but is she really alive? She's just dying slowly and poisoning everything around her in the process.
@@randomidiot8142 behold, the NPC mompreneur - society is full of them
Didn't you hear ??? She's a CEO
The plan whereby women work to pay other women to bring up their children is insane. I once changed my whole view of a, then, friend who put her 7 month old in daycare from 6am to 7pm so that she could work to pay for the outrageously expensive house they bought. It made me physically sick. She is not even actually working. Further, as a European, let me tell you that our benefit, health and housing systems are collapsing under the weight of people not working but taking out and then making epically irresponsible decisions because there is no rock bottom.
European here. There are not enough govt. made daycare centeres, even tho we have negative natality, aka less kids each year. Yet taxes are going up up and away :)
Spanish here and this is 100% true and by Socialist design.
French : Oh my... same here.
Bbq this sunday ? I bough the wine.
In Sweden, there are Work programs and student programs for women. With the aim to push more women into field such as security guard.
These programs are paid for by the taxpayers.
Women use this program to get work, however they choose to become mothers when it's time to start working, something that forces companies to keep this workplace open until the women return.(Aka the workplace pay these women while the women stays at home) Otherwise they may be sued by the state.
So these women come back when the baby is 2 years old, and then get pregnant again ... And the circle continues.
I knew a chick from Ireland when she was dating my friend, she already had 5 kids, the government payed for literally everything. Her flat, food all of it. She was legit given money in cash and she spent it to come here to America once a month, for like half a year while they were dating, for a week at a time. And now she bitches about never having money and her 3rd marriage is falling apart and her kids don't like her... Well maybe she shouldn't have banked on the government supporting her and her dumb choices and not starting to have kids at age 15...
What I don't understand is how did they not get a bad credit score or fall into massive debt after these decisions??
I had this argument all the time with my wife. We should spend more on child care to give them the best start. They can learn, math, reading, etc.
My counter had always been why? Is there anything you can show that proves they are better adjusted, or have higher paying jobs, or are happier?
It’s much better to save that money for when they are older to deal with any learning difficulties, for them to do sports, or save for education instead.
The most important things pre-k kids need to learn are social skills. That is literally all they do in kindergarten
Tell her she can teach them math, reading, etc herself instead of paying some stranger to do it for her.
She can insantly "make" an income of $5000/mo if she just took care of her own kids.
The cognitive dissonance of these people is mind-blowing. Also, no idea why these people are having kids if they are so intent on not having to actually raise them themselves.
Hell even just rent wipes out their income, so they either need to find a cheaper place, or move somewhere they can afford, it is like they cannot do basic math.
Actually it's "Net Income" of 60k...
which means over 100k or 50U$ per hour (or 75U$ per hour if you identify as girl)!
lol
She never wanted to raise her own kids. That's why she pays $5K monthly for another woman to raise her kids.
Gross, that's what poor people do
"The Price of Freedom is Discipline."
I already understood this concept but hearing it today helped clear my mind of the current unknowns I've been facing, so thank you so much for this!
Freedom is responsibility. Today, no one wants to be responsible for themselves.
Oh and you can't have freedom and equality, you have to choose one.
Free men are not equal and equal men are not free.
the socialist government is the new feminist husband. dead beat wives cant keep a man
@@andyknolls8735 as a religious and spiritual person, I find this a very interesting insight.
No. The price of freedom is taking responsibility. Discipline isn't inherently good or bad -- you can be disciplined in your approach to vice or virtue. Taking responsibility is inherently virtuous. It implies that you pay all the costs for the failures you generated instead of externalizing them onto others.
Discipline is a magnitude without a direction. Taking responsibility has magnitude and direction.
Too much freedom is destructive to the fundamental base of society that's why the west is collapsing inevitably
My daughter taught me the most important financial lesson I could’ve ever learned, and this was before she ever earned her business degree. We were out shopping when she was about 7 years old, and I made a comment about not having the money for some thing I was about to buy (dishwasher). She looked up at me and said, “Mommy, how can you buy something if you don’t have money?” I thought she had a point, and decided not to buy it, and went home to make a plan to save the money for it instead. We washed dishes for an extra 5 months, when I was able to buy it with cash. Felt good, and my husband was impressed that I didn’t “fall into the typical trap”. I told him to thank his daughter for the solid financial advice. She’s 27 now and sans her home and her husband’s car, still lives by that mantra. And I still thank her for that lesson.
"a childcare desert" almost every kid has a mom....
It's always amazing to me that people are willing to pay such astronomical fees to neglect their children in a socially excepted manner.
A great analogy is that a parent would jump into a lake full of alligators to rescue their child. A 'day care provider' not so much (obviously this witch is an exception to this rule).
lol they pay money to avoid being a parent. So fucking low
Yes!!!!! Daycare is extreme neglect, babies HAVE to be held and talked to to develop properly, at most if not ALL of these daycares there is not enough people to interact w the babies enough. the parents who just leave their kids all day those babies end up just laying in their cribs way too long so long that the back of their heads get flat ): it’s literally evil and child abuse and should be illegal so i dont feel sorry for this #girlboss c*nt in the vid at all.
What you guys don't understand about motherhood is women DO want to be home with their kids but many men can't afford to support a household on their own anymore. It isn't the 60s anymore and despite paying a buttload for daycare he needs her income and MANY women are unhappy with this arrangement and it's one of the many reasons why money is the main leading cause of divorce.
@@jlovesj3335 you aint wrong but the man isnt normally the one initiating the divorce per statistics :)
"Mother of three" like do you want a reward because you successfully had intercourse?
Yeah. Child birth isn't that special. Not like billions of birth givers haven't done it over the course of tens of thousands of years.
I mean getting laid usually gives you popularity points but I think that was only in highschool
Keep in mind, snails, raccoons and penguins also mate and have offspring.
@@BridgesDontFly since the beginning of life.
If she got pregnant it was unsuccessful.
You are the main channel I watch now, your so smart and insightful. If the whole world watched your channel, a lot of problems wouldn’t exist.
Thanks!
About 9 years ago I convinced a coworker to quit her job and be a stay at home mom. She was earning $15/hr. Her husband was making about $45k a year. She had 2 kids that weren’t school aged. After paying for daycare, a second car payment/insurance/gas/maintenance, business-attire clothing, spending several dollars a day on lunch, etc, her actual pay for being at work versus staying at home was about $5.15 an hour.
I told her she’s basically missing out on their childhood and causing stress in her marriage (because both were too tired to keep the house clean/cook/laundry/etc) in order to work her butt off for $5.15 an hour. She put in her two week notice and quit. A few months goes by and I see her at a local grocery store. She seems so much more calm and happy. She said her kid’s behavior had improved and they seemed happier also. She did say it was tough making do with one car after they sold their second vehicle but it was a small price to pay.
yea and you can always pick up a cheap 2nd car later. (they are hard to find but they exist) i drive a 91 geo storm and my insurance is like 350 bucks a year and i think about 400 bucks in upkeep a year.
Congratulations for successfully manipulating a women into quitting her career
@@nishayong6884 1) it wasn’t a career it was a 911 call center job 2) if by “manipulating” you mean showing her how much she’s actually making after expenses then I don’t think that word means what you think it means. 3). Choosing to work and be so stressed that it’s detrimental to your marriage for $5/hour at a dead end job while paying strangers to care for your kids makes absolutely no sense.
@@nishayong6884 ah yes, call center job = career. Highest IQ feminist
Yes Alex. I hear you but she will not get social security in her old age. Plus being around kids all day kills a woman's brain cells
If the expensive child care she loves so much is $60,000/year and her husband takes home $65,000 after tax, she could effectively double their income by taking care of her own kids
1+1 sometimes equals 7 to selfish individuals
No she can't. How is she supposed to run her not for profit business with kids around?
@@lukeclarke267 You serious? Self employed, with what appears to be a website venture. She has total control of her schedule and all the time in the world. Plus with such a dire economical situation she would be better off putting it off or getting a normal job. Opening a new business when you are about to go bankrupt and have little to no funds to support it isn't the brightest idea.
Was thinking the exact same... thanks for posting.
@ Just A Guy
😏 Sounds like misogynist talk to me.
I have watched a few ads where the product isn’t for people who can’t do basic stuff but it’s actually a bit more complicated
Like closing a bag of chips without having to roll it up, it also has a little knife for opening and shortening the bag
Parents aren’t supposed to be friends to their kids first. You are parents first, friends later. You make sure your kids are fed, bathed, clothed, enriched, and disciplined. Teach them what you know, make sure they are disciplined and responsible growing up, and keep a _very close_ eye on their education to make sure their chances of success in life increases even if by a little bit. If you don’t have to do any of that at the moment, then you can be their friend.
She could literally just raise her kids herself. And not live in one of the most overly expensive states.
Not even like they couldn't afford to move since they had all those savings. Can't save those who don't want saving.
@@AlexParkYT true true
Leaving a state isn’t the answer, because these people will leave and just vote the same way that got New York into this mess in the first place.
@@AlexParkYT what an age
City*
"The best daycare for kids is being raised by their parents."
That's the first and last word.
who would then earn for food and a roof over their heads?
@@dwadziesciatrzydwadziescia6047 The father.
Stay-at-home moms and provider father roles exist for a reason, after all.
I'm not saying that is the only way to conduct a family, but I will say that after much deliberation that there isn't a better way to do it unless you just reverse the father and mother's role (stat at home dad and provider wife).
Two working parents end up most detrimental to a child's development when raising the kids is outsourced to daycares, schools, and the internet.
@@C4X3Music Pretty much this. I have an unusually high income, so the plan for my husband and I with future children is for him to stay at home with them. But my job also provides massive flexibility for me to be there for kids, so we might decide on a different arrangement in the future. I have done a very large portion of the childcare for my stepson from the time he was 2.5 to the 13 year old he is now, and I'm happy to do it. I can work from home a lot of the time and take days off as needed for appointments, school events, etc. As I have said elsewhere, I'm going to do whatever is best for my family, and if that means at some point that I completely stopped working in order to stay home with them full time, then that's what I do. There cannot be compromises when children's wellbeing is at stake.
@@C4X3Music Oh, and as an aside, thank you for acknowledging that mothers are not somehow uniquely capable of caring for children and fathers are not. I have several colleagues whose husbands are stay at home dads, and it's pretty clear to me that it doesn't matter which parent does it as long as somebody does. I find it really weird when stay at home moms behave like their husbands simply are incapable of caring for children. I see that all the time. It's really depressing to see them think so little of him when he's the one paying for everything and would probably like to be able to spend more time with his kids without being nagged or directed or assumed to be incapable.
@@dwadziesciatrzydwadziescia6047 also the mother herself, my mother raised me and my sister alone working and studying in a third world country so it is possible to raise and educate your daughters and sons yourself while also providing what is needed, the woman in the video said that doesn't matter the cost you want anything for your children but you gotta be smart with your finances and sometimes it isn't possible to pay for some things, there are limits
This is my favorite video you have made. I can't stop laughing at your well-timed jokes.
Going to have to watch again to catch them all. 😍
I felt a bit useless being a full-time SAHM when we moved two years ago. I worked casual part-time before. (4-10 hours per week). I am happier not working but felt pressure by society that I should be working. Looking forward to have ammunition now and will continue to be a SAHM to my awesome teenagers.
Stop caring what soyciety demands of you. Do what is best for your family.
What gets me is the moms who call taking care of their own child a job. It’s not! What it is, is your responsibility is it hard yes but it’s not a job
>women
>can literally stay at home
>do all their hobbies and interests
>can day trade
>imply they can't make money
When are women going to realize they're being conned because they're a market? You think men like working for meaningless companies they have no stakes in? No, wtf work is so fucking dreadful it's the reasons we work why we do it, yet women want to do it because... um it's working and it's empowered. Not all women, obviously, it's all fucked up on many many more levels and a certain group of people are to blame: the elite.
Especially for this situation. Your not getting any money for your "job" aka your hobby and your kids are already in day care. Why not invest in a small business.
Women care about appearances above all.
They'd rather suffer to be "strong and empowered" than not suffer being "oppressed".
Facts, women are getting played out here and fooled into thinking they gotta do what the men have been doing for centuries just because of "equality". Well this "equality" is stopping them from really being happy.
Ye in this day and age its empowered for a woman to be more loyal to her boss than her husband lmao...
And then she will wonder why she cant find a man.
Fax.
Your videos get me so fired up! I’ve been a housewife and mom for the past 9 years now. I just want to say it’s awesome! I have 3 kids. I homeschool so I’m able to control and know exactly what’s going into their education AND we get to do things like fun field trips that we choose. I am also completely in charge of our nutrition and can cook a range of really fun and delicious meals. We are almost never rushed or stressed. My husband is able to take on any overtime or extra hours at work without any worry. When my children are sick it’s no big deal we just have a movie day no money lost. What I do is not demeaning! I get to spend all of my time with my most favorite people on earth! I’ve never missed a first word or first step of my kids. I get complete control over my schedule and what I do during my “work” day. I want a documentary about women like me!
Can I ask you how you deal with being a stay at home mom and wife? I was raised to be career oriented, but being married has change my view. I rather enjoy being housewife, but feel guilty over it. I know it has something to do with feminism or how I was raised. It even seems like some of the wives around me feel like school and a career is a big deal or even everything. Anyways, I think it's nice, even going against the grain, that you chose family.
You're doing God's work, it will be families like yours that save this nation from ruin.
Glad to see it. When your kids grow up society will be better off for it.
@@greenkittyaqua if you enjoy being a housewife then screw what everyone else thinks. Raising a family is awesome and your children will carry on your legacy for generations to come. Can you say the same about a "career". 9 out of 10 companies won't even be around in another 50 years so if you choose the career path you'll most likely be switching jobs multiple times over that time span. You also get to start over at the bottom rung everytime working your way back up to the top repeatedly. I'm not saying work is bad, work is a good thing, to a point. But if your enjoyment is in the home then love that life to the fullest and be happy, you are WAY ahead of the power curve. Plus family is awesome, watching your kids grow up..... there's nothing like it. I'm super jealous that my wife gets to be with our kids all the time. I miss so much of their daily lives and the funny and goofy stuff they do all the time. I usually hear about it after the fact. Don't get me wrong I love to provide for my family but I wish I could be there for all the things I miss. But this is my burden to carry and I gladly bear it for my family, both parents shouldn't carry that burden. Your children, all children deserve to have someone there to listen and love them. Anyway I've gone on too long, don't let other people's opinions influence what you know is right, keep pushing forward and ignore the detractors.
@@greenkittyaqua I struggled with it the first few years too so you’re not alone :) both my mom and mother in law are career women. What I came to realize is that I can’t live to make others happy. I like what I do and it’s how I want to spend my life. I want to be with my kids. I like having a clean and tidy home. I like getting a new recipe and mastering it. For someone to come and tell me that what I’m doing is of less value simple because it doesn’t bring in any money is rude and untrue. I love the quote “If it makes you happy it doesn’t have to make sense to anyone else”. People are going to judge you no matter what so you might as well be happy and be doing what is best for your family!
I literally love your narrating. and im now sub'd. thanks man!!!!!!
As someone who lives in Europe, I'm sick and tired of people saying: "you get that for free". No, we don't we pay MASSIVE taxes to pay for the welfare state.
This made me think of my mom. She ran her own store. A real store, no internet fantasy. She took care of us and even the neighbor's children when we got out of school every day. She cooked, cleaned the house and made sure we did not lack anything. In the evening she went to school herself. Never once did she think of herself. I was very blessed. Feel bad for those kids.
While your dad got executed by budget satan
That's impressive. Did she ever sleep?!? Probably not too much.. That's a good woman!
@@asundev3326 Not sure what you mean, but my dad worked hard too. He just did not bother with children or household. couldn't even finish school and had my mom get the papers he needed. lmao Pretty sure he's friends with satan.
@@jasonbourneistreadstone A differend generation. They worked themselves to death sadly, but did not complain. They were like a whole differend breed. I got very lucky with mine also haha
@@jaffasholva7738 Lol Asundev's comment went waaaay over your head, *JAFFA* .
"I pay about $5,000 a month for childcare" No, he pays $5,000 a month for childcare. It's his money. How is she contributing to the finances?
What's hers is hers and what's yours is hers
@@thetriggeringofthesnowflak725 lol but she has nothing
@@gotthesauce5221 And if you're like the simp in the video, soon enough you'll have nothing because you're paying for all of her expenses.
@@featuremarkstudios lol well im not so 😒🤷♂️ lol
@@featuremarkstudios lol the guy looks soulless . I can just picture him having to get wasted at the bar after work before going home to his feminist wife complaining about something.
I love how you actually bring great points in to the mix, and how these isolated incidents of "greatness" work for one specific scenario but doesn't encompass the reality of it all, or how, if at all, happy or even better yet, content, these peoples lives have been improved, that's gotta be the worst part of our Information Age, things are always out of whack, out of context, and always fluffed to propagandize some otherworldly feeling or service that actually will not help anyone.
Loved the video game bit. Never have truer words been spoken. Love it!
Chooses to: live in an expensive city, have 3 kids and a dog, get tattoos. These are people who deserve to be laughed at.
She, most likely, has a $1200 iPhone, a $70,000 BMW SUV that get 12 miles a gallon. Wears $100 shoes. Lives in a 4000sq ft HOME on 6 acres of land worth ~$1,000,000. She has no idea what struggle is. She is complaining about having to take $10,000 a month for child care when the average yearly salary in America is $42,000 a year. She's dropping $120,000 a year, just to take care of 3 children at home. What? That is piss poor money management. As to why anyone would give a platform to someone this pathetic is just as pathetic.
I knew this couple, always broke, this chick always had new tattoos. Bish please!
This is the same group of people who complains about wages while getting useless degrees working at Starbucks and thinking they should be allowed to live in the bay area of san francisco. Here's a hint sweeties you aren't owed shit.
Don't forget "my man makes 100k a year before tax (65k$ after tax... And these feminist losers demand a man making that much, base level for "a good man" unless you're hot.
Deserve to be sterilized
"Feminists Are Now Complaining About the Problems They Created"
Haven't they always done that? In the end, feminism is a sign of immaturity
Feminism is Marxism disguised as “equal rights” same goes for BLM though BLM is a terrorist organization
TY that is the first thing I thought when I heard the title. It's like where has Think Before You Sleep BEEN!
Well said Jim. I completely agree.
@@Jim87_36 Feminism has almost always called for the destruction of Western society, so I consider them terrorists at well
Yup like dummies
Funny childcare in Germany works by law and doesn’t cost 2100 dollars a month. You are being rubbed
We pay quite a lot of taxes here in Sweden, I just finished school and I have to say I’m grateful for my country’s system, also recently had a life threatening brain surgery and was flown twice over the whole country and it was all free.
There's plenty of evidence that Sweden's system works better than that of the US. The supposed problems with European-style welfare states and the idiocy of the woman in he documentary are two separate issues.
Except it wasn't free. You paid for it via taxes.
Flying all over a small country isn't that big of deal when it's your fellow taxpayers footing the bill. Hope you're enjoying all that dieversity they're shipping to you...
Rest of the Population(taxes) paid it for y0u
"I" pay for the childcare. "I" want a better life for my children.
"we" don't have money. "We" are using our savings.
-Rebecca, CNBC documentary, 2019.
-
-
Rebecca: I'm a feminist, I want equality, you must pay me as much as a man.
Also Rebecca: proceeds to work on a job with 0 salary and has no problem with it whatsoever. (She is proud of it.)
feminism means superiority, not equality. call me when feminists want women to get the draft and I'll believe they want equality.
It's worse than that. It's her own startup, so she definitely had to invest some money into it.
Her husband is a simp for allowing this and even looks like one
Rebecca the Hypocrite
Not only she doesn't earn any money, she doesn't even look after kids.🙃
I remember once, when I was about 17, having a phone conversation with a mother of three small kids who was looking for a full-time daytime babysitter during the summer. I told her I expected to be paid the minimum wage, which at the time was just over three dollars an hour. She was stunned and said something like, "What's the point of me going out to work, if I have to pay a babysitter that much?" It was on the tip of my tongue to say, "I don't know; you tell me."
People who have children and cant affort or even want to spejd time with them are the worst
@Potatoe That's the real info. Many western women only want to "work" to get away from their very own children. It's sickening and why population is going down all over the west.
Official bruh moment
@@fullyboilthatpotatoe I think you missed the point
@@rhuonaChanel i think you didnt see the video your commenting under :)
The price of Freedom was a great thing to point out.
I can’t help but think of Chuck Palahniuk’s line in ‘Fight Club’ “The things you own end up owning you.” Or something or other. Great video, bro!
It’s also worth noting that this entire situation can be circumvented by not having children. Its not rocket science and no one else should pay for your mistakes because you “really wanted to be a parent”
It's shocking she didn't think of the obvious solution of her staying home and taking care of the children.
she probably doesn't like her kids
She probably works from home on her startup haha
She's too busy having an important job to take care of her kids. She's more of a main character than other people. It's okay for main characters to use side characters to get the job done. Raising children is a job, not a responsibility that people freely impose on themselves by choosing to have kids. Main characters are never responsible for the setting in which they find themselves.
She got programmed by other feminists into by thinking working and prioritizing work at all cost even if that cost comes to a compromised decision for their children own well being is somehow a norm. It’s the same ppl making terrible decisions and think government welfare will solve all of their problems
it's not shocking at all... when you have a family and you quit your stable job to start a nonsensical "business" that brings in no money, you're not very smart in the first place... what's shocking is that fact that her husband puts up with her bs
The moment I realized I was pregnant, my husband and I did the math and realized that I should stay home. I wasn't going to work 40 hrs a week and put my kid in daycare, just to only add an extra $500 a month to our income. It was the best decision we could have made. That was in 2008, I'm still a stay-at-home mom of three children. The feminist movement lied to women.
The idea of being a feminist is about equality maybe give you an example of if a man vote we should vote if a man go to work, we should go to work, etc. feminist nowadays are nothing close to that. That’s why I don’t support it.
Ele não mentiu, apenas foi longe demais.
the power of math is a good one
@@AttackOnTitanlover1999you seem to be an extremely younger child, if there is one thing you must learn as life goes by is that equality does not exist, equality is a word that compiles any kind of context and can be used for everything since it's semantic is confusing. So if you check more deep within people use that word slightly meaning that they say nothing.
Take for example the Flag of US, it comprehends every single citizen despite sex, religion, race, etc... So law is plain at that point, it applies justice, the thing is that an ideological group use that word and it's confusing meaning with the objective to divide society and destroy institutions from within, so now that you kinda understand what is your current situation regarding that "equality" argument you find out you are in a flawed and distorted generation and cannot do anything about it, maybe in 2 or 3 generations can be fixed, but at this moment that word causes a lot of turmoil in USA, no peace will be found maybe in more that an 150 years.
i have a friend whose mom was a stay at home mom. his mom would later study biology on her own while raising her kids as a hobby till she became knowledgeable enough that she became a credible source for tutoring actual college students. after her kids grew up, she would go on to college herself. i think this is a good model to try. stay at home and raise kids and persue your passion as a hobby, then get certifications afterwards. btw, my friend is now in coastguard
The lady was complaining about paying taxes for tampons would be like someone complaining about paying taxes for food products.
I work at a supermarket 4 to 5 days a week and my girl stays home and takes care of our two kids and we did the math. It is cheaper for her to stay home to take care of the kids and better for the kids than sending them to day care first of all I wouldn’t have enough money to pay for daycare. I would have to probably get another job and by doing that I wouldn’t see my wife or kids as much so Daycare really separates families and I think it’s very important during your child’s early adolescence that you are around as much as possible
This reminds me of an experience I had about 20 some odd years ago. My father is a successful radiologist, part of that success is not letting anybody know what he really makes except him ("If I told you what I make a year, every time I turn around someone would have their hand out,") this led to my extended family always complaining they didn't have money, or more accurately, while being successful in their chose fields, didn't have my father's level of income. One day we went to an uncle's house, and he showed us this $2000 Ford Escort with something like an $8000 stereo in it. Point is, they, as my dad put it "have money for what they really want" and if you gave them more money they would just spend it on more crap, for the most part. The thing that is most baffling to me, is they just jumped in with both feet without the slightest consideration of "can we afford this". No, if mom in the video had kept her job, or even better, stayed home with the kids, their lives would be significantly less problematic. Also, stop giving money to this "financial advisor", or if you insist on it DEMAND RECEIPTS for what they are doing with the money, otherwise it's just pissing money away. Like you more or less stated in the video, it's unfair for the taxpayer to subsidize poor life choices, if you're a single mom, WHERE THE HELL IS DAD?!?! They never seem to hold them accountable for just taking off. I get widowers and such, but I get the distinct impression that's a small minority. If dad was around helping with income and child care things would be much better, but they always emphasize "single mom" as if it's some badge of honor.
Pull your own weight, learn from your mistakes and move on, don't keep making the same mistakes and making others pay (literally) for them. One thing that would benefit society greatly is letting people fail at things and not supporting them on the taxpayer dollar. It's amazing what people will do when you stop paying for their lifestyle, they do stuff like get jobs and earn an income.
I would add that we shouldn't be subsdizing women's bad dating choices. It isn't just that 'most men' run away but that the 'ladies' choose men who will run away from the responsibilities. The men who wouldn't do that are often shafted by the government to pay for the choices these self same women made.
I have a feeling they didn't mention the part where that financial advisor is her boyfriend
Your dad was a wise man. I grew up in the trailer park and it always baffled me how people always had money for their Marlboros, Budweiser, and Subwoofers, but not for rent or basic groceries.
@@darrekworkman8685 I think a significant portion of those women either chose men who wont stay or push the fathers out of their lives because they are egotistical control freaks who want full authority over their offspring. But that may be bias from soaking in too much "mommy social media".
on a related note: The more i have observed of feminist policies and how the interact as a whole, and the stuff they keep trying to implement, the more i come to the conclusion that their ultimate goal is a society where women never face consequences for their mistakes.
Your dad is a wise man. I'm not a radiologist but have a successful career in IT. I am not "rich" but very comfortable and have a lot of savings and investments. I have had girl friends, friends, and family all ask in subtle ways how much i make over time. I always just say I do ok. One time i was at a family dinner one of my sisters was like "your going on another trip, didnt you just go on a 5 day trip like 2 months ago?" I was like yeah, then came the "did you get a bonus or something." I said that doesnt matter i planned accordingly. My dad looked at me smiled and gave me a wink. He knows like me its none of their business how much i make. As long as i can pay my bills and do what I want while still saving and investing money for my future, im good. Plus i dont want to be asked to borrow money. I have also had family members complain to me when a stock or investment i make has a good payoff. "Why didn't you tell me about it? Why not set me up with it to make money? You never tell us about these things!" Well I did the research to make a sound investment, you never asked about it or for any help with investments, and if i tell you about everything i invest in and you lose some money initially you will complain and blame me.
Short : Absent mum sends her toddlers to expensive daycare she can't afford to free her time to be able to advise other women how to be a present mum.
liberalism is a mental disorder.
The summary I needed lol 😂
Exactly what I was thinking!
Love this channel, and the Fed wants to end cash giving them 100% control of all our money, but they have shown over and over how crap they are when it comes to money. And if you do or say something that upsets them they will turn off any access to what was your "money".
Nope you’re absolutely right, I’m only working out of necessity. But I certainly didn’t create that problem, the problem started wayyyy before I was born. It really is a shame
Whenever I feel a little down about never marrying, all I have to do is look around for an ice cold feminist like that and think to myself. "Could you even imagine being stuck with THAT for the rest of your life?" And I'm happy again!
Probably why I watch these type of videos. Modern women are too insufferable. I’ve never married because I’ve never found a woman worthy of marriage.
As a woman I totally understand you! It has even gotten to the point that when a man meets a woman who claims to be traditional (which i am), they quite justifiably don’t believe it.
@@annoulag3621 Good for you. It always cracks me up when I hear a woman say she wants a traditional man but she is Not a traditional woman. Not even close. I don’t think they see their hypocrisy.
the socialist government is the new feminist husband. dead beat wives cant keep a man
Don’t be upset ever about not marrying it’s a complete scam ruined my dads life in fact look for a woman who isn’t bothered if you don’t want to marry
After many many years "wasting my life playing videogames" this year I decided that it's time for a change. I have been listening to you for a long time. Videogames taught me many things most importantly English. So I signed up on a website to teach the language. In just two weeks I got 9 students. I went from prett much 0 to now roughly 800 dollars per month and I am still getting phone calls and emails almost every other day! I felt lost and worthless depressed and lonely for so long. But now I feel so much better. It will take time to build my life up but I think I am headed in the right direction. Forward. Thank you!
Awesome to hear even though I don’t think I wasted your life playing games. Everything in balance. Great job!
Nice
Wishing you the best
Congrats!
Def didnt waste your time playing video games since they are a great learning tool, provide entertainment, and actually provides a sense of achievement when completing something. Women rely on men to eat up there time, where guys have sports and video games. Always healthy to put your mind at ease doing something you enjoy
I just discovered you here. You are brilliant. I will listen to more. Appreciate your in depth way of looking at things. 1.3 million views? Are you not making a lot from this work?
My brother in law and his wife make a combined 200k+ a year. They are going to be sending their almost 1 year old to full time day care soon and are looking at spending like 2k a month. This is in NY as well. They are constantly complaining about how "tight" it is going to be (lol) yet talk about how they get approved for mortgages 750k+ all the while they both work from home and also live with my in laws. My wife is a stay at home mom and when I suggested that maybe one of them leave their jobs to be one/watch their spending/ look for cheaper houses, I literally opened the flood gates of bullshit. It ended with my sister in law screaming and running upstairs to her room lol and all of us kind of sitting there awkwardly.
Worst part about all of this is is that people like her will always only want the option that helps them the most in the moment.
Right now, as her business has 0 success, she wants tax payers to prop her up so that she can do what she wants.
If her business had taken off and been super successful, she'd want to pay less taxes. I guarantee it.
Most people are hypocrites because integrity is difficult for adults that are unwilling to learn.
You sir, just nailed it.
Facts.
Feminism didn't ruin women,
It revealed who they actually are.
Say it louder for the ppl in the back
Hell ya sir! It also relieved us from duties if youre smart enough atleast to stay away
based
Nope. It revealed how lack of social control mechanisms held firmly in place encourages anarchy of single group with disasterours consequences for society at large.
There we go, THERE WE GO, we are accepting reality.
Scandinavian countries can pay for childcare because they are smarter with what they use their big money on
Very important work 👊 who is actually doing the exploiting of society here ? 🤷♂️
"Rebecca doesn't need socialism, she needs to stop making bad choices!"
Common sense and logic are two things she does not comprehend at all.
Funny how popular socialists like Cenk's Nephew (hasanabi) are rich.
@@pieynot9084 honestly it's because people like that want an excuse to blow tons of money and have the important stuff covered by the government
the socialist government is the new feminist husband. dead beat wives cant keep a man
Imagine paying rent that is higher than 99% of most peoples mortgage, just to live in an INCREDIBLY bad, dangerous area, in a collapsing city, in a small crappy apartment.
It's like stupid heaped on stupid.
Like most things when it comes to people. Its all about status.
That's leftism for you.
Exactly, $5000 a month is pretty much a $1 million dollars mortgage
exactly
5000 to essentially live in a damn project??
Seriously
Even london isnt this bad
Hey... most people here can afford it. Histrionics can't. Big wigs in Downton can afford it... heck sewage workers in Chelsea can afford it.
With 65K I would have gotten my children a homestead & homeschooled them myself with the only thing it won’t be able to cover all that well is opportunities for friendship, but that’s easily remedied by going outside & meeting people.
This lady can be a stay at home mom and actually make her family financially stable
Not true. Even if she stays at home and they get rid of the daycare costs, they are still paying almost the entirety of his paycheck just on rent.
Their lifestyle is unrealistic on so many levels.
That lady is a prime example of a product of our society
Disgusting... smh
@@Chitownhomestead yes society is super disgusting and you have to be disgusting to think otherwise.
@@shadeaquaticbreeder2914 don't think, just consoom
@@insaneweasel1 exactly lol we basically already in the zombie apocalypse 😂
@@shadeaquaticbreeder2914 gonna be downfall of our society
Another thing this documentary does successfully is minimize her husband's presence and contribution to the point that it almost seems non-existent. It makes Rebekah look like she works hard to take care of her family by herself and that the government (not the person she's in a relationship with) needs to step in and solve that problem.
That's because the role of the husband is taken for granted.
To be fair: he doesn't need to solve the problem, she is the problem and needs to solve herself instead of continuing her *lobbying* (which is what she and this documentary is doing)
Entire media is based on entitlements and profits of victim Olympics. Media will always show any voman as a victim no matter what the scenario, that way there is zero accountability.
It's what the left want, to increase gov power.
Yes it does. I should have mentioned that. I think he is only in like 20 seconds of the documentary. Everything else is her and other women. Like literally he is the only guy in the documentary which is quite sexist. Are men not capable of taking care of children? They don't even let Nathan describe his own salary. His unemployed wife does it.
Step 1: Don't have 3 kids, step 2 live somewhere cheaper 3. Step 3 stay at home mom instead of paying childcare