China's Modern Military | Animated History

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ธ.ค. 2023
  • Thank you to Holzkern for sponsoring this video. Support our channel by visiting www.holzkern.com/thearmchairh... to find the perfect gift for your loved ones, and use our special discount code “armchair15” at checkout to receive 15% off on all products this holiday season!
    Sign up for Armchair History TV today! armchairhistory.tv/
    Merchandise available at store.armchairhistory.tv/
    Armchair Historian Video Game: store.steampowered.com/app/16...
    Support us on Patreon: / armchairhistorian
    Discord: / discord
    Twitter: / armchairhist
    Sources:
    Army Headquarters, Department of the. Chinese Tactics. Fort Belvoir: Army Publishing Directorate, 2021.
    Axe, David. “Yes, the Chinese Navy Has More Ships than the U.S. Navy. But It’s Got Far Fewer Missiles.” Forbes, November 9, 2022. www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe....
    Burke, Edmund J., Cortez A. Cooper, Mark Cozad, and Kristen Gunness. People’s Liberation Army Operational Concepts. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2020.
    Campbell, Caitlin. China Primer: The People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, 2022.
    Campbell, Caitlin. China’s Military: The People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, 2021.
    “Chapter Six: Asia,” The Military Balance 123, no. 1 (2023). 208-301.
    Cliff, Roger. China’s Future Military Capabilities. Carlisle Barracks: United States Army War College Press, 2023.
    Diamond, Larry, and James O. Ellis. “Deterring a Chinese Military Attack on Taiwan.” Bulletin of the atomic scientists 79, no. 2 (2023): 65-71.
    Fravel, Taylor M. Active Defense: China’s Military Strategy Since 1949. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019.
    Garamone, Jim. “China Military Power Report Examines Changes in Beijing’s Strategy.” U.S. Department of Defense, November 29, 2022. www.defense.gov/News/News-Sto....
    “History of the PLA’s Ground Force Organisational Structure and Military Regions.” Royal United Services Institute, June 17, 2004. rusi.org/explore-our-research....
    Li. Xiaobing. A History of the Modern Chinese Army. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2007.
    Maizland, Lindsay. “China’s Modernizing Military.” Council on Foreign Relations, February 5, 2020. www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chin....
    McCauley, Kevin N. People’s Liberation Army: Army Campaign Doctrine in Transition. Fort Leavenworth, Kan: Foreign Military Studies Office, 2020.
    Secretary of Defense, Office of the. Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2022.
    State Council Information Office, PRC. China’s National Defense in the New Era. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 2019.
    Tijerina, Luis Lázaro and Muhammad Ali Baig. "China’s People’s Liberation Army: Restructuring and Modernization," Open Military Studies 2, no. 1 (2022). 84-95.
    Wuthnow, Joel and Phillip C. Saunders, Chinese Military Reforms in the Age of Xi Jinping: Drivers, Challenges, and Implications. Washington DC: National Defense University Press, 2017.
    Music:
    Armchair Team Credits:
    docs.google.com/document/d/1s...

ความคิดเห็น • 2.3K

  • @TheArmchairHistorian
    @TheArmchairHistorian  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +209

    Thank you to Holzern for sponsoring this video. Support our channel by visiting www.holzkern.com/thearmchairhistorian to find the perfect gift for your loved ones, and use our special discount code “armchair15” at checkout to receive 15% off on all products this holiday season!
    Sign up for Armchair History TV today! armchairhistory.tv/
    Merchandise available at store.armchairhistory.tv/
    Armchair Historian Video Game: store.steampowered.com/app/1679290/Fire__Maneuver/
    Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/armchairhistorian
    Discord: discord.gg/thearmchairhistorian
    Twitter: twitter.com/ArmchairHist

    • @explodingwolfgaming8024
      @explodingwolfgaming8024 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      We respect Holzern here!

    • @jacktmyt378
      @jacktmyt378 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@explodingwolfgaming8024same

    • @lg6707
      @lg6707 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We will all mostly be dead by 2049 so not sure why they're bothering

    • @chadczternastek
      @chadczternastek 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That was one of the most enjoyable commercials I've seen on TH-cam. I just bought a G-Shock Master Of Mud watch had I seen this sooner I would of bought in a split second. It's gonna be workin my head I'm sure till I get one..or two.

    • @bskiez
      @bskiez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      *2:14* I had no idea you had a wife and he's only 24yo. Glad you've made something of yourself.

  • @schmidtytime
    @schmidtytime 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3079

    I seriously don’t understand why TH-cam continues to punish its most prominent creators that upload studio-level productions. This was another great video by you guys, I hope you’re all looking forward to the upcoming holidays! Wishing you the best from Canada.
    Edit: Censoring the truth and our history is a mistake we have made as a species many times over.
    This comment wasn’t supposed to be political, but it’s shameful TH-cam and their advertisers prioritize profit, instead of propping up its creators who produce amazing educational/informative content on all subjects.

    • @VladimSandv4
      @VladimSandv4 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      С Наступающим Новым Годом!

    • @horseshoethief242
      @horseshoethief242 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      😅😊

    • @muscleman5133
      @muscleman5133 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      Remember if you give TH-cam money you stay no matter the situation. If you want a bonus you must not be under “racist TH-cam employees” who will just age restrict you for no reason or ban

    • @007ShaolinMonk
      @007ShaolinMonk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      TH-cam has offices in russia, probably in China too
      Money does not smell, and they will suck anything their sponsors ask to.

    • @thesenate1844
      @thesenate1844 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A reminder that all the established news networks were grandfathered in by TH-cam, the usual rules don't apply to them and they thus monetize all their videos covering naughty topics like the latest mass shooting.

  • @Vincevans168
    @Vincevans168 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1210

    You forget to mention that PLA still has political commissars at every level.Which is quite unique now consider Soviet Union get rid of theirs and in the end couldn't control their own military.

    • @tanjeeschuan4999
      @tanjeeschuan4999 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +197

      It's weird that both PRC and ROC has political commissars in their military

    • @michaildubinin515
      @michaildubinin515 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

      U forgot to mention Soviet Union declined comissars in 1942 and won ww2 without political commanders, that became battle commanders or privates depending to their abilities. Also Red Army accepted officer system in 1943, almost the same as in Russian Empire.

    • @davesthrowawayacc1162
      @davesthrowawayacc1162 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

      So does the Imperial guard and the 40k Ultramarines, and they're the most effective fighting force in the universe

    • @Tomas-gw6rd
      @Tomas-gw6rd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@tanjeeschuan4999this is effectively how all modern militaries work. Socialist states are just open and direct about it while liberal states put up pretenses of being otherwise. You couldn't be an open Communist in the US military if the US had a serious and powerful Communist movement for the same reason the Chinese aren't interested in letting globalist aligned liberals into their army. It's a direct threat to Chinese sovereignty in general, not just the CPC

    • @mkvenner2
      @mkvenner2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      actually the soviets didn't get rid of political officers the simply changed the name and their precise duties.

  • @Imbrojeff2361
    @Imbrojeff2361 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +279

    It's kind of ironic that the west both label China as aggressive but also laugh at China for not having enough combat experience since they haven't fight a war since 1979.

    • @liliya225
      @liliya225 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

      However, the reason why China lacks combat experience is that they don't need and have no idea of foreign aggression at all. For them, it is more important to protect their country and quickly organize forces to rescue in earthquakes, plagues and forest fires.

    • @juniopradana4003
      @juniopradana4003 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

      Because that''s a typical propaganda tactic. Saying your adversary aggressive but not competent at the same time. Powerful and simultaneously weak.

    • @ne0nmancer
      @ne0nmancer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Both can be true, they are very agressive when enforcing the nine-dash line, for example. Doesn't mean they have combat experience as you'd find in an actual combined arms war.

    • @jrherita
      @jrherita 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I mean they are doing brinksmanship around Taiwan, and also sending ships into Japanese waters occasionally. That’s aggressive.

    • @dongren8620
      @dongren8620 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The experience of the United States is also to bully some small countries. These experiences lack reference significance in dealing with countries with comparable strength.

  • @rsookchand919
    @rsookchand919 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1258

    Another installment in the modern military series. Hell yeah!
    Can’t wait to see you cover the US

    • @pabcu2507
      @pabcu2507 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +145

      I’ll wait for the day he does one on Luxembourg, the most powerful nation on earth

    • @chickenwarriorr
      @chickenwarriorr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Men's nipples are better than women's

    • @conservativecatholic9030
      @conservativecatholic9030 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

      @@pabcu2507Naw, if he is going to do that he needs to cover the military capabilities of Vatican City. Lol

    • @56V6G6
      @56V6G6 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      This video almost covers the US military more than the PLA lol

    • @Uncle228
      @Uncle228 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@conservativecatholic9030nah, the Great Sealand.

  • @frankhill4358
    @frankhill4358 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +311

    If you’re China when it comes to military build up you’re stuck in a dilemma. If you build up your military of course your rivals aren’t going to like that.
    But if China doesn’t build up its military then it can be exploited by others. This isn’t even speculation, just look at China during the 1800s and 1900s. Warlords took control of the country, foreign powers established their spheres of influence, British opium planted in India flooded their black markets, and then of course Japan invaded numerous times.
    In other words, if China builds up its military it will be called a threat and if it doesn’t it will be threatened.

    • @Apple.CC.technomail
      @Apple.CC.technomail 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      There could be a simpler solution though. For example, instead of an aggressive build up they could try a steady and slow military buildup.
      Diplomatically speaking, aggressive wolf warrior tactics isn’t really helping them. Having a friendly and looking as non threatening as possible for as long as possible would’ve given them more time.

    • @Robsidians
      @Robsidians 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      Us westerners also dont like the whole genocide of minorities thing.

    • @lolasdm6959
      @lolasdm6959 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +173

      @@Robsidians Does it remind them of themselves?

    • @LoveHammerMan
      @LoveHammerMan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      @@lolasdm6959 Reminds us of ancestors, yes.
      Equally disturbing to see what's supposed to be a modern nation doing it...

    • @frankhill4358
      @frankhill4358 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +101

      @@Apple.CC.technomail America has bases all over the pacific, including South Korea and Japan. How would a slow military build up make any sense? I mean imagine the reaction if China had major military bases in Mexico.
      China DID go the diplomatic route. Look at history! The diplomatic and friendly route hasn’t exactly worked for them seeing how the British flooded China with opium when trade wasn’t going their way or that Japan invaded them and committed some of the worst atrocities in history.

  • @stevenchan8211
    @stevenchan8211 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +151

    "Suffered heavy losses but were able to gain support from the Soviet Union" Is selling the chinese in the Korean War short. They had a lot of interesting tactics to counter superior US firepower and arguably a better grasp of the operations part of war.

    • @enriqueperezarce5485
      @enriqueperezarce5485 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Not really they were fighting a way superior opponent who had every advantage, I will admit tactically and sometimes strategically they would do some good maneuvers (Chosen being the biggest highlight) other then that it was very attritional, the loses they incurred basically stoped any hope of a Taiwan invasion for a very long time

    • @aroonsubway2079
      @aroonsubway2079 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      @@enriqueperezarce5485 Taiwan's official name is Republic of China (ROC), according to its own constitution. ROC and PRC are still in a civil war situation.

    • @stevenchan8211
      @stevenchan8211 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      @@enriqueperezarce5485 I mean the fact that the Chinese managed to fight the US to a stalemate while contributing the majority of the boots on the ground says something. Especially when you consider that contrary to the narrative of human waves, by the end of the war the number of Chinese and UN troops in Korea was pretty similar.
      I think people are quick to point to Soviet support for why they were able to do so, but there's only so much air power can do to affect the outcome of a war.

    • @ianshaver8954
      @ianshaver8954 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They did have the incredible advantage of being on the same continent as the war they were fighting.

    • @ziyueguan3430
      @ziyueguan3430 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@enriqueperezarce5485 At that time, Korea was a way more important than Taiwan was. I mean US had the airpower for the whole duration, so the PLA knew this very much that this could be very attritional.

  • @thomaszhang3101
    @thomaszhang3101 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    12:40 correction: 8 cruisers, or 0, depending on classification. PLAN classifies 055 as a destroyer by functionality, while the US classifies it as a cruiser by tonnage.

  • @brokenbridge6316
    @brokenbridge6316 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +407

    Well I was expecting to see how uniforms from ancient China evolved into what they are today. But still this video was a good one to listen too. So nice job.

    • @kongqiyiwang
      @kongqiyiwang 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

      The video has to be an hour, from the Shang Dynasty to the present, 4000 years

    • @brokenbridge6316
      @brokenbridge6316 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      @@kongqiyiwang---And a lot of research would likely go into it as well. But if done right.. I wouldn't mind watching it. Even if it's an hour long.

    • @BaguettePair
      @BaguettePair 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@brokenbridge6316Not a lot of people would though

    • @brokenbridge6316
      @brokenbridge6316 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@BaguettePair---I'm not most people

    • @Douchey_Elkmen
      @Douchey_Elkmen 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@BaguettePair we the special people, we don't care about most people's opinions on a certain niche

  • @dirtysniper3434
    @dirtysniper3434 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

    I kinda hope for this series to expand with, u.k russia, france, and japan

    • @zchen27
      @zchen27 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      With Japan picking up defense spending again, might be good to visit what Japan has in a few years.

    • @dirtysniper3434
      @dirtysniper3434 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@zchen27 dosent there no navy treaty also end soon? Or is that still up to the u.n?

    • @zchen27
      @zchen27 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@dirtysniper3434 There's no external Treaty, only Article 9 of the Constitution forbidding Japan from carrying out offensive war.
      Which can really be interpreted as loosely as you want.

    • @minhhieuchannel765
      @minhhieuchannel765 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I Hate Russia!

  • @davidchang7910
    @davidchang7910 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +145

    PLA actually didn't officially went into Korean war. It was the Chinese voluntary army, made by volunteers across the entire country at that time, including to farmers, workers, and active military personels, who went to the war.

    • @iforgottosignoutagain8181
      @iforgottosignoutagain8181 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The CPC actually did want to interfere, as If the south won the war, the Americans and the west would be right at China's doorstep. It was called a volunteer army to lessen the perceived interference by the CPC.

    • @lifetrees1
      @lifetrees1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      The KMT soldiers who surrendered after losing the civil war in 1949 were involuntarily volunteered to fight the Korean war as cannon fodder.

    • @TheHaydena76
      @TheHaydena76 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

      "Volunteered" is certainly one way to say it.

    • @huas5350
      @huas5350 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      BS!

    • @imadeanaccounttocomment7800
      @imadeanaccounttocomment7800 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

      ⁠​⁠@@rowdymacias9393I don’t get why being conscripts or volunteers would change the definition of it being a full military intervention. The Americans sent in a lot of draftees for Korea and still maintained that it was a police action.

  • @jamesz2436
    @jamesz2436 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Fun fact : The official name should be CPC (Communist Party of China),CCP was originally from western media, which they want people to relat it with CCCP, in UN they only use CPC, NOT CCP.

    • @ffff7164
      @ffff7164 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      CCoPe

    • @horstnietzsche1923
      @horstnietzsche1923 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Or CCP rolls off the tongue better? Plus CPC looks like PCP.

  • @nateklein418
    @nateklein418 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    As soon as the notification pops up I stop what I’m doing and watch. Love y’all’s work!

  • @billpetrak
    @billpetrak 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    3:00 "defending China and its neighbours"
    North Korea - Yes
    Pakistan - Ok
    Albania - wtf?

    • @aceflaviuskaizokuaugustusc8427
      @aceflaviuskaizokuaugustusc8427 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Well it doesn’t exactly match up with what is being said. But it’s because China and the Soviet Union split along ideological lines with China seeing the Soviets as abandoning the Marxist-Leninists. And well Albania didn’t go along with the Soviets so yea China saw itself as defenders of their ideology.

    • @minhhieuchannel765
      @minhhieuchannel765 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hate North Korea

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China actually gave a lot of weapons to Albania, for free, with zero political strings attached.

    • @davidw.2791
      @davidw.2791 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Albania was calligning with China more after the mid 1960s. We hve the insane amount of economic gifts to show for it. 😅

    • @game_boyd1644
      @game_boyd1644 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have Hoxha to thank for that

  • @RynoG2003
    @RynoG2003 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +294

    I would love to see you talk about China’s paramilitary agencies like the militia and the people's armed police.

    • @supasek7597
      @supasek7597 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ไอ้พวกนี้มันก็แค่แนวหน้าอยู่แต่ถ้าขอให้เขาทำแนวหลังเขาน่าจะทำได้

    • @AN-jz3kf
      @AN-jz3kf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      And the coast guard. We can add many more ships to the navy. Personal fishing vessels can be conscripted during war under laws passed at the beginning of the modernization process (I suppose to be used as transports? idk the value)

    • @user-ef5ib9xk8q
      @user-ef5ib9xk8q 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      they are the ones who did the oppression against Uyghurs and Tibetens

    • @RynoG2003
      @RynoG2003 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@AN-jz3kf The coast guard is part of the people's armed police and the maritime militia is the agency that uses fishing vessels.

    • @AN-jz3kf
      @AN-jz3kf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RynoG2003 ah. Thanks!

  • @ThingsThatIDo
    @ThingsThatIDo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Excellent choice of subject! Excited about this one🎉

  • @armedmage
    @armedmage 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    I've love to see you do videos on the 21st century wars in the Caucuses, like the South Ossetia war and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflicts.

    • @crashoveryu
      @crashoveryu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Too early to be thoroughly covered and studied without bias. Give it a decade or two and you might get a nice video or two.

  • @BlackWall320
    @BlackWall320 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    truly a beautiful channel.

  • @valmid5069
    @valmid5069 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Cant wait for more content!

  • @ASH9366
    @ASH9366 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Thank you for your Information ℹ️ Armchair Historian 🙏🏼

  • @ethanyoung5200
    @ethanyoung5200 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Super interesting. Thank you!

  • @jiachengwu4185
    @jiachengwu4185 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Great content as always. Got (almost) all the little details right.

    • @arandomwalk
      @arandomwalk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Can you perhaps elaborate?

  • @dennisliuxinlu
    @dennisliuxinlu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +158

    To be fair, the US hasn't had any experience fighting modern superpowers either.

    • @fireironthesecond2909
      @fireironthesecond2909 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      In Ukraine?

    • @baneofbanes
      @baneofbanes 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

      @@fireironthesecond2909the US isn’t fighting in Ukraine.

    • @lolasdm6959
      @lolasdm6959 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      @@fireironthesecond2909Even if the US joined in Ukraine, I don't think fighting alocholic conscripts is the same as fighting China.

    • @MrkTan
      @MrkTan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Yeah, but the US has more experience in warfare though

    • @aroonsubway2079
      @aroonsubway2079 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

      I am confused by the comments. US was involved in multiple morden wars in the past decades, and they are regarded as the good guys and peace keepers? Just wondering what people on TH-cam want China to become ... if the youtuber said Chinese army is so strong, people will say "China is dangerous and bad", but if the youtuber said Chinese army is a joke and they don't dare to fight, people will still say "China is weak and bad" .... so it seems no matter what the Chinese are doing, they must be bad LOLLL

  • @ipernixi8118
    @ipernixi8118 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    The quality of these videos keeps going up. Love to see it!

  • @Rose-jr4tx
    @Rose-jr4tx 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +85

    The fact that we get free videos on TH-cam by The Armchair Historian is truly a gift. 👏👏👏👏👏

    • @semiramisubw4864
      @semiramisubw4864 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You pay with your datas my man. YT is owned by google and google probably knows more about you than you mother.

  • @cityboi551
    @cityboi551 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

    Could u do a modern miltary of a country like el salvador or mexico?they have both been changing rapidly to battle the cartel.

  • @robinfarmer2085
    @robinfarmer2085 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    If possible, it would be great to see a video on the evolution of british aircraft

  • @TheGrandBuzzard
    @TheGrandBuzzard 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Been watching for years now. Love your videos

  • @XiaolongHistories
    @XiaolongHistories 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +130

    Great video! Is there going to be an evolution of Chinese uniforms coming soon too?

    • @dergberg3923
      @dergberg3923 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      if there is then I already feel bad for the researchers and artists. Imagine having to draw all the warlord and infighting governments' uniforms!

    • @silveriver9
      @silveriver9 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dergberg3923🤡

    • @shanescatsandcannabisfarm2965
      @shanescatsandcannabisfarm2965 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​​@@dergberg3923it wouldn't be any harder than drawing any other uniform....

    • @muhalifakbarsuaib3977
      @muhalifakbarsuaib3977 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@shanescatsandcannabisfarm2965it's less on about the drawing of uniform, more so of the quantity

    • @kongqiyiwang
      @kongqiyiwang 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      视频必须是一个小时,从商代到现在,4000年

  • @codyshi4743
    @codyshi4743 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Finally a video on the Chinese army. But why isn’t it an evolution army uniform video like that of the video on the Japanese, French, American, Russian, British, and German army videos?
    Edit: China's modernization didn't just begin under the communist and after the Korean War, China's army modernization had begun since the Self-Strengthening Movement in 1861, under the Qing Dynasty (China's last imperial dynasty). Ever since the self-strengthening movement, China has adopted western weapons and tactics.

    • @hughmungous786
      @hughmungous786 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Prob doesn’t want to mention the millions upon millions of deaths that it took to reach the point where they are now.
      China doesn’t exactly have the cleanest history…

  • @Indrani_Mukherjee.
    @Indrani_Mukherjee. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    This is such a good and documented video. I will love to see if you do a video on India's modern military.

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope Indians can read carefully and experience with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India determines the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of both countries and you will understand. India has been colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, its strength declined significantly, and its status was replaced by the United States. India achieved independence through non violent and non cooperative means. In other words, India's independence has not undergone the test of blood and fire. Such an independent country lacks cohesion, willpower, and a sense of national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since the British defeated the corrupt and incompetent Qing government in 1840, the Chinese people have been living in dire straits. Various disasters and wars followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, suffering various humiliations. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan becoming a Japanese colony, the Eight Nation Alliance setting fire to the Old Summer Palace, and subsequent Japan's comprehensive and brutal invasion of China. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion of China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese military and civilians rose up to resist, fought with blood for fourteen years, and suffered 30 million casualties, ultimately achieving victory. Do you know why there are so many casualties in China? There are hundreds of reasons, and I will only give an example of one phenomenon: Chinese troops are in conflict with Japanese troops. Often, if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war is 100, they only have 20-30 firearms. The remaining soldiers did not give up resistance or surrender. They bravely fought against the Japanese machine guns and cannons with machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks until they sacrificed themselves. This spirit of facing death as if returning home and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties because their knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance. Do you know why there was the Nanjing Massacre? Due to the desperate resistance of the Chinese military and civilians, they will never surrender or give up. After Japan captured Nanjing, firstly to vent its anger, and secondly to scare off other Chinese soldiers and civilians in resistance. However, the Nanjing Massacre not only did not deter any Chinese people, but also further aroused the resistance of the Chinese people. The establishment of New China has gone through the test of blood and fire. Do you know why the Chinese national flag is red? That's because the establishment of New China was bought with the blood of countless Chinese ancestors, and we Chinese people will always remember it. From 1945 to 1949, during the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a peaceful life they had longed for, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out, lasting three years. The Chinese People's Volunteer Army successfully resisted the northward route of the United States without air superiority, sea superiority, outdated army equipment, and extremely poor logistics, at the cost of losing hundreds of thousands of brave People's Liberation Army soldiers. As for India's unforgettable and shameful 1962 Sino Indian War, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. Firstly, it only took 32 days. Secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, during which many people starved to death. In 1962, India's economy far surpassed that of China. Both the United States, the Soviet Union, and Britain support India. At that time, India implemented a "forward policy" and attacked China with elite troops. We Chinese people really don't want to go to war. The Chinese troops that participated in the war with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense forces, not regular People's Liberation Army. In China, soldiers are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and soldiers are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the borders of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not surrender, vow to resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it would be a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than giving up is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess. So, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand tall in the world like China? Absolutely impossible.

    • @J_X999
      @J_X999 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think India's military history has most of its ties with foreign powers. A lot of Indian military equipment is not Indian. That will take a while to get over, but I absolutely expect it to be achieved.

  • @jl88570
    @jl88570 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Excellent work friend. Make a video and for the modern vietnamese army please.

  • @realsaulgoodman8933
    @realsaulgoodman8933 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    I think a video on the modern British military would be quite interesting. Great video!

    • @cattysplat
      @cattysplat 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Cutting numbers. Gutting Royal Navy.
      More reliant on being a support for US forces.
      More aircraft carriers.

    • @p03saucez
      @p03saucez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Definitely would be interesting but sad if you're even vaguely familiar with the British military of the past.

    • @NeostormXLMAX
      @NeostormXLMAX 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@cattysplatus vassal nowdays

    • @Russian382
      @Russian382 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry, i think no one care or is interested in today's British military, because today's UK is just the USA's smaller brother.

  • @breadslice7030
    @breadslice7030 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    You know it’s going to be a good day when he uploads

  • @ChristineCAlb1
    @ChristineCAlb1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Always learning new things from your videos. Love them.

  • @AB-bg7os
    @AB-bg7os 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If we could get a little text pop up with a source at some parts, this would be the best channel

  • @ryanrichards1673
    @ryanrichards1673 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Love the video Griff. Was wondering if you have ever considered doing a video on the Mexican American War? Like your take on Mexico's Revolution and their history during WWI you did a few weeks ago. But a video on the Mexican American would be a great visual for my students if you ever do one.

  • @AymanKhan
    @AymanKhan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    5:33
    Been a fan of yours from the start, never expected to see a Rajneekanth reference 😂😂

  • @simonhagstenn
    @simonhagstenn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You really need to start adding more playlists I can save in my library!

  • @TheBoss10725
    @TheBoss10725 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for your hard work. Much love

  • @dansmith4077
    @dansmith4077 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great video thanks

  • @Egghead11159
    @Egghead11159 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I think you should do one for the American modern military history I think it would be great to compare and if you haven’t done it yet and I like watching this channels history it’d really be interesting just saying

  • @user-tf6th9ne4c
    @user-tf6th9ne4c 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The video shows 07.In fact, as of last year, the PLA has been equipped with the latest type 21 training uniform.

  • @ikergonzalezmartin2201
    @ikergonzalezmartin2201 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I wish they make spanish army uniforms

  • @thatmemestar378
    @thatmemestar378 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Amazing and improving animation styles 👌

  • @donvince1854
    @donvince1854 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Such a good video, high classed

  • @odd-ysseusdoesstuff6347
    @odd-ysseusdoesstuff6347 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Keep it up guys!

  • @Mrwhomeyou
    @Mrwhomeyou 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    PLA has already abandoned gorilla warfare tactics by the end of the civil war. PLA fought with the ROC with conventional war tactics. Also fought against the Americans in Korea with conventional war tactics

  • @Fortune02
    @Fortune02 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    Thank you for another installment! Any plans to showcase the Yom Kippur War?

    • @user-op8fg3ny3j
      @user-op8fg3ny3j 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      October 7th

    • @SnakShaksClosed
      @SnakShaksClosed 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      From the Palestinian perspective I hope

    • @crose1466
      @crose1466 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@SnakShaksClosedwell, I'd hope he'd be objective.

    • @enriqueperezarce5485
      @enriqueperezarce5485 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@SnakShaksClosedtheir isn’t as huge of a Palestinian perspective as they weren’t a active player in the Yom Kippur war given that they didn’t exist for more then 2 decades at that time

    • @arjay5425
      @arjay5425 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      i'd like to see this too honestly, a two part series, one video from the israeli, and another from the egyptian perspective. The Syrian perspective isnt as interesting in my opinion, as someone whose read a lot from generals from all 3 countries.

  • @bowenc24
    @bowenc24 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    They look strong, but how well could they handle US units equipped with T-45 power armor that wield miniguns?

    • @BoliceOccifer
      @BoliceOccifer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      realmente

    • @adventurefaps9571
      @adventurefaps9571 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      gaymer moment

    • @k.g.b5816
      @k.g.b5816 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They will deploy their stealth units to sabotage US facilities,allowing China victory!

    • @sleepyjoe4529
      @sleepyjoe4529 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      lol american delulu moment

    • @adam68756
      @adam68756 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      USA is a joke, only win in cartoon

  • @user-dd7jv2qr7r
    @user-dd7jv2qr7r 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As a Chinese I have a question, that is, will American soldiers participate in the disaster relief?

    • @yousa_hanser
      @yousa_hanser 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      美军不捣乱就谢天谢地了😂

  • @JM_RedCoat
    @JM_RedCoat 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This video will most likely reach an abundant number of views and likes, possibly a million.

  • @AGamerthatregretsalot
    @AGamerthatregretsalot 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    I see this as an absolute win as i love learning more about modern Chinese history

    • @yuluoxianjun
      @yuluoxianjun 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣

    • @f1ringfed
      @f1ringfed 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      👀

    • @loadingnewads
      @loadingnewads 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China will disappoint you…It doesn’t like leaking data

    • @winter-xy8qj
      @winter-xy8qj 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yuluoxianjun 😅

    • @user-cy1zz7yq1l
      @user-cy1zz7yq1l 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      中国近代历史绝对是爽文一般的存在

  • @gisotenbrink7567
    @gisotenbrink7567 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Always glad when you post something. its incredibly well put tohgether. its crazy lol

  • @geminiengine2719
    @geminiengine2719 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Could you do a video on the battle of Alaska in World War Two? It was the Japanese invasion launched alongside the battle of Midway. It’s a hugely overlooked part of the pacific war. The American and Canadian forces were outgunned and under supplied, facing a vastly superior Japanese force while equipped with only ww1 gear and ships. If the Japanese succeeded they could have stopped lend lease to the soviets and raided the west coast.

  • @karloveliki5373
    @karloveliki5373 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    9:10 lmao the hidden amogus on the clipboard

  • @johnnyissuper6955
    @johnnyissuper6955 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    YOOOOOOOOOO niceeeeeee bro I'm so glad you're back

  • @joewilliams8286
    @joewilliams8286 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Great content as always guys! Thank you

  • @AK13133
    @AK13133 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Absolute masterpiece. I never thought I’d watch a movie I loved more than Road Warrior and was worried when I heard this was coming out but man I was blown away. I hear people complain about it just being all action and no story but that’s a terrible misrepresentation. It’s an amazing story told with a few words as possible and that sets it apart from most modern flicks. Love George Miller and I hope he keeps the story going!

    • @dakotaDklunsford
      @dakotaDklunsford 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Did you comment on the wrong post? This is about china's lackluster military, not a lackluster movie.

  • @Admiral_Red
    @Admiral_Red 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cool! A new video!

  • @Keith-hv4cz
    @Keith-hv4cz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    High quality content my friend❤

  • @qiangwang9514
    @qiangwang9514 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    These saying about "lack of experience" is popular in China:
    1. China lack of experience, but who want to be the sparring? If you can't find the victim, the only thing can do in peace is drill.
    2. Asymmetric warfare experience is not PLA need, at least for now. And lot of Chinese military fans think US goes to the wrong way of focusing on asymmetric warfare.
    3. Unmaned weapon is a great solution, more sweat for less blood.

  • @jacob_perry18
    @jacob_perry18 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Idea: The history of the 2014-2015 Donbas Conflict

  • @alpacaofthemountain8760
    @alpacaofthemountain8760 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video!

  • @oneshotme
    @oneshotme 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up

  • @Luvinist
    @Luvinist 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    8:03 This one, I feel is more of a case of mistranslation and a different cultural concept for how to classify 'army'. The word in Chinese is 'jun'. This somehow is translated to English to 'Army', which is not accurate since China classifies all top level military organizations to this word. So the more accurate translation should be 'military' or 'armed forces' which is exactly what they are. For comparison, see the Chinese names of the ROC military.

  • @OneSingularStair
    @OneSingularStair 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +129

    I love this content! Screw TH-cam for demonetizing you! History should not be censored and people who speak about it should not be punished financially for it! (Here’s a suggestion: Do Poland’s rise in power recently and how it could become Europes next major superpower as well as a dominant global player.) Love from warsaw! ❤️

    • @OneSingularStair
      @OneSingularStair 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ISIPrava711 Not exactly what i mean

    • @GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
      @GuywithabadenglishOfficcial 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@OneSingularStair aint no way you're actually Polish

    • @anrw886
      @anrw886 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Honestly I can see why. The polish immigrants I've met here in the UK are some of the most hard working people I've met

    • @outofturn331
      @outofturn331 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Full marks for patriotism, buttttt..

    • @OneSingularStair
      @OneSingularStair 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial I’m Polish and Proud!

  • @user-yb3zc8ni7c
    @user-yb3zc8ni7c หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    7:02 love the type 81 in the animation.

  • @clement28300yip
    @clement28300yip 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Quick note: PLA's Rocket Force was formerly known as the *Second Artillery Corps* between 1966 to 2016.

    • @howie6768
      @howie6768 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Colloquially known as “二炮”。😂

  • @christopherhoffer6643
    @christopherhoffer6643 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Could you make a video about the Ogaden War?

  • @cdilga
    @cdilga 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the ultrawide aspect ratio

  • @minhnguyen-rp2es
    @minhnguyen-rp2es 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Who draws thuse illustrations and the thumbnail? They are 🔥

  • @andyb2028
    @andyb2028 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    TH-cam will punish the people who do the hard, real work for talking about history or politics to make their advertisers comfortable, yet every ad I see is either a blatant scam or NSFW-themed ad. What a sad state of affairs

  • @wogelson
    @wogelson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    By January 2023 the US DoD estimated China to have reached 400 nukes. In October the DoD stated that China sharply increased its nuke arsenal by 25%. That's 100 nukes in less than a year, making China the 3rd largest nuclear power with 500 nukes.

    • @Jake-dh9qk
      @Jake-dh9qk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      LMAO this is why people need to read data though and not just take words as is. China IS number 3 in nuclear weapons but that doesn't mean anything when America has like 5000 nukes.

    • @aroonsubway2079
      @aroonsubway2079 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So China has much fewer nukes than US LOL

    • @rodgerwong3643
      @rodgerwong3643 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      你知道的只是让你知道的,既然是对手,那为什么要让你知道我底牌?

  • @modelnanpresident
    @modelnanpresident 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video

  • @arron3850
    @arron3850 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love this video! Please make a video for the Vietnamese army, as there is very little info on TH-cam!

  • @user-so8zd6bq1n
    @user-so8zd6bq1n 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    In the Korean War, China, then a poor agrarian nation emerging from civil war, fought the world's largest industrial nation and pushed the US-led coalition of 17 nations from the Yalu River on the Chinese border back to its present 38th parallel, which is inconceivable. They had Soviet assistance, but only the air force, and Soviet assistance to the Chinese military was so reluctant that it was minimal. From how little the U.S. military and even Americans talk about the Korean War, we know who lost the war.

    • @MrkTan
      @MrkTan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      The objective of the UN forces was to free South Korea though. Conquering North Kor was just a bonus. Not to mention, the US has to fight a war half a world away

    • @outofturn331
      @outofturn331 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@MrkTanalso casualties not comparable

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      The US/UN only really lost 개성(開成), but saved South Korea as intended and even advanced in the eastern mountains. Plus the surprise success of the PVA only lasted a couple months until UN combined arms tactics got refined at 지평리(砥平里), afterward getting consistently beaten back until they were able to dig in for classic trench warfare at the line that splits the peninsula today.
      But sure continue to gloat about 장진(長津), where the outnumbered Americans escaped with practically all its serviceable equipment and organization intact and still had space to rescue over 80000 Korean refugees, while the PVA ultimately lost almost half its fighting strength and totally failed in its goals to destroy X Corps and conquer all of Korea.

    • @dsan8742
      @dsan8742 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@outofturn331
      I mean obviously, due to the huge disparity in industry and firepower

    • @Hideyoshi1991
      @Hideyoshi1991 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      the US wanted to keep south korea alive. The US did lose, but so did the soviets and chinese. Neither wanted to commit to a long, drawn out war, which korea was quickly becoming, so soon after ww2. It was the lack of motivation from the Soviets and Americans that ended the war.

  • @LarvaAsia
    @LarvaAsia 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    You forget to mention that PLA still has political commissars at every level.Which is quite unique consider Soviet Union get rid of theirs and in the end couldn't control their own military.

    • @baneofbanes
      @baneofbanes 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Soviet Union at no point ever lost control of their military. In fact commissars weakened their military, that’s why they got rid of them.

    • @user-ri1gp5fp8h
      @user-ri1gp5fp8h 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@baneofbanesThat's the reform of Galbajos.Lead to the Soviet UnionEven if there is truth, I can't change it.

  • @noahoktay4294
    @noahoktay4294 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    are we able to get videos like this for historical armies (Napoleonic French, Victorian Britain etc)

  • @RexKing-lc1tf
    @RexKing-lc1tf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    19:24 I caught a little mistake, you said “Informationization” but the word was “Informatization” 😂. Anyway, thanks for being one of the greatest channels to ever exist, sorry TH-cam has been so hard on you. Love you guys ❤️

    • @fiaviy.5298
      @fiaviy.5298 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope. Informationization is a real word. A dedicated term.

  • @MrTangolizard
    @MrTangolizard 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    If Russia is a superpower then so is France and the U.K. and Japan

    • @hamzamahmood9565
      @hamzamahmood9565 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      There's only one country that fits the superpower status... Everyone else is a regional power

    • @helmuthvonmoltke5518
      @helmuthvonmoltke5518 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@hamzamahmood9565Great powers. Regional powers are only able to influence their immediate surroundings/sphere of influence.
      Brazil and India would be examples of regional powers.

    • @dirtysniper3434
      @dirtysniper3434 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well they are also superpowers same with russia. U.k and France have both been superpowers since the end of ww2. Japan in recent history has become one and would be one if it ever starts a navy again.

    • @kaifxaif9502
      @kaifxaif9502 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Apart from Russia,the others countries could hardly take any decision of their own.

    • @mrhonkhonk6116
      @mrhonkhonk6116 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Iran is regional power saudi arabia is a regional power India is a regional power germany too france is a global power if you can projet your force around the world you fit in the global power

  • @UCMpDwp7VEfKXRH3NyAW7kuj
    @UCMpDwp7VEfKXRH3NyAW7kuj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Do you know another name of PLA? “人民子弟兵” this is most important beyond all powerful weaponry

  • @V77768
    @V77768 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    9:15 omg it’s him. For everyone who doesn’t know there’s something on the paper

  • @user-ko6xp6xz6n
    @user-ko6xp6xz6n 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think this is the coolest channel on utube

  • @jonisukanen9431
    @jonisukanen9431 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Can you make a history of Finnish univorms?

  • @ex0duzz
    @ex0duzz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Great general rundown of China's modern military. The 2049 target to be a "world class military" was a general target, it has most kirkt been pushed forward due to USAs and the wests continued aggressive actions against China. From chip bans to Aukus/Quad to more military bases in Philippines etc. USAs increased aggression has forced China to respond and likely speed up its modernization. Just like China moved forward it's space program, especially the moon base. It used to be like 2040-2050, now pushed forward to around 2030-2040. So they will have started building moon base by 2030 at latest and continue building it over the following decade/s.

    • @timifun
      @timifun 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Stop with the hate😂

    • @AndrewJeffersonCotter
      @AndrewJeffersonCotter 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The idea of any country building a moon base in the next 20 years is laughable

    • @user-pi7md5br6f
      @user-pi7md5br6f 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​@@AndrewJeffersonCotterIs it? Will you laugh at someone who told you 20 years ago that the Chinese built their own space station, stealth aircraft and electric cars?😂

    • @AndrewJeffersonCotter
      @AndrewJeffersonCotter 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-pi7md5br6f man has never set foot on the moon. The US faked the moon landings

    • @user-nd7ue6xf8l
      @user-nd7ue6xf8l 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@AndrewJeffersonCotterDon't underestimate we China people.😅When you say it, you can do it

  • @alexandermcbey5095
    @alexandermcbey5095 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let’s go, what a topic

  • @brianstabile165
    @brianstabile165 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    16:20
    Nice use of mysterious stranger

  • @ripsnorter185
    @ripsnorter185 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    9:11 idk but that piece of paper is looking a bit sus

  • @PixelatedKarelia
    @PixelatedKarelia 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Thanks for this awesome video! From a Chinese-American user

  • @DonTitoNYC
    @DonTitoNYC 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey, Griff! Which hand do you wear your Holzkern watch?

  • @cgpm.pr.caranggab
    @cgpm.pr.caranggab 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Props to you and your company for the creatiotof this great ,clear and educative video. I learn a lot of things I didn't know and make things clearer. Thank you and keep the good work. Thanks 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼🇺🇸🇺🇸

    • @footlessbird1998
      @footlessbird1998 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don’t believe the team that made the wrong map of China

  • @wow664112
    @wow664112 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    13:30 it's also worth mentioning while chinese destroyer have less VLS cell but their VLS can launch supersonic anti-ship missile such as YJ-18, in US only Zumwalt class are design to have similar capability

  • @nicholasshaler7442
    @nicholasshaler7442 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    “Such as the United States.”
    There is no such category. The United States Department of Defense is totally unique among the world’s militaries. We have no rival.

    • @hx5525
      @hx5525 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That is true as a whole. But American forces are stretched out across the globe. Even the US can’t be unmatched everywhere at once.

    • @colinsteadland
      @colinsteadland 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@hx5525the point is that we have forces across the globe, ready to attack or defend instantly. Having a global attack force that can mobilize instantly plays a big difference versus having to wait for the rest of the military to arrive

    • @hx5525
      @hx5525 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@colinsteadland Agreed. US power projection is in a class of its own.

    • @akriegguardsman
      @akriegguardsman 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But in a conflict with china would weaken the U.S to a stage that would make them no longer have no rivals

    • @adam68756
      @adam68756 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia is doing better job than USA, USA lost war with Afghanistan, Syrian, Vietnam.
      Russia have not lost war yet. USA is the big Joke !

  • @pokethegreat4145
    @pokethegreat4145 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Pls do one of this for India too.Also pls make a 1971 war video. I would really love to see more India related videos in this channel

    • @mingmuyiyang8615
      @mingmuyiyang8615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope Indians can read carefully and experience with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India determines the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of both countries and you will understand. India has been colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, its strength declined significantly, and its status was replaced by the United States. India achieved independence through non violent and non cooperative means. In other words, India's independence has not undergone the test of blood and fire. Such an independent country lacks cohesion, willpower, and a sense of national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since the British defeated the corrupt and incompetent Qing government in 1840, the Chinese people have been living in dire straits. Various disasters and wars followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, suffering various humiliations. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan becoming a Japanese colony, the Eight Nation Alliance setting fire to the Old Summer Palace, and subsequent Japan's comprehensive and brutal invasion of China. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion of China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese military and civilians rose up to resist, fought with blood for fourteen years, and suffered 30 million casualties, ultimately achieving victory. Do you know why there are so many casualties in China? There are hundreds of reasons, and I will only give an example of one phenomenon: Chinese troops are in conflict with Japanese troops. Often, if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war is 100, they only have 20-30 firearms. The remaining soldiers did not give up resistance or surrender. They bravely fought against the Japanese machine guns and cannons with machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks until they sacrificed themselves. This spirit of facing death as if returning home and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties because their knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance. Do you know why there was the Nanjing Massacre? Due to the desperate resistance of the Chinese military and civilians, they will never surrender or give up. After Japan captured Nanjing, firstly to vent its anger, and secondly to scare off other Chinese soldiers and civilians in resistance. However, the Nanjing Massacre not only did not deter any Chinese people, but also further aroused the resistance of the Chinese people. The establishment of New China has gone through the test of blood and fire. Do you know why the Chinese national flag is red? That's because the establishment of New China was bought with the blood of countless Chinese ancestors, and we Chinese people will always remember it. From 1945 to 1949, during the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a peaceful life they had longed for, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out, lasting three years. The Chinese People's Volunteer Army successfully resisted the northward route of the United States without air superiority, sea superiority, outdated army equipment, and extremely poor logistics, at the cost of losing hundreds of thousands of brave People's Liberation Army soldiers. As for India's unforgettable and shameful 1962 Sino Indian War, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. Firstly, it only took 32 days. Secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, during which many people starved to death. In 1962, India's economy far surpassed that of China. Both the United States, the Soviet Union, and Britain support India. At that time, India implemented a "forward policy" and attacked China with elite troops. We Chinese people really don't want to go to war. The Chinese troops that participated in the war with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense forces, not regular People's Liberation Army. In China, soldiers are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and soldiers are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the borders of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not surrender, vow to resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it would be a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than giving up is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess. So, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand tall in the world like China? Absolutely impossible.

  • @RyukyuanRipper
    @RyukyuanRipper 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The background with the framed picture PLA soldier with the guns has me dying. 😂

  • @Andy10736
    @Andy10736 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Damn, this is going to be interesting

  • @kingace6186
    @kingace6186 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The PLA can be summed up in a sentence: Big in numbers but not in tonnage or experience.

    • @putlindmitrievich6322
      @putlindmitrievich6322 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Although, no major power has had near pear full spectrum combat experience, except maybe russia, though that is arguable.

    • @lolasdm6959
      @lolasdm6959 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I have no idea why tonnage isn't big.
      In one year, the PLAN basically commissioned the same tonnage as the French or British navy.
      But yes, the only comparison which matters is with the US.

    • @sleepyjoe4529
      @sleepyjoe4529 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah...China doesn't have experience in invading weaker countries and then leaving behind billions of assets in a quick withdraw / retreat. 💀

    • @Huajierenmeiluziye
      @Huajierenmeiluziye 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because China's adversary is the United States and only the United States。

    • @pabcu2507
      @pabcu2507 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@putlindmitrievich6322true, many tend to forgot Russia so far is the only country thus far to fight a war involving modern weapons (instead of fighting against guerilla fighters with AKs) but Russia lowkey could’ve done better

  • @user-tb6tw9iz7f
    @user-tb6tw9iz7f 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The king is back .Thank Griffin Johnson

  • @devildog2378
    @devildog2378 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Right as I’m about to join the corps this is uploaded. Fitting