ANIMAL - Long Review | Sucharita Tyagi, Rahul Desai, Ishita Sengupta | LIVESTREAM
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ธ.ค. 2023
- Sandeep made a film. Film critics are giving it cultural context. Ajaao.
SUBSCRIBE - bit.ly/35NEDO7
Animal is a 2023 Indian Hindi-language action thriller film directed and edited by Sandeep Reddy Vanga and produced by Bhushan Kumar, Krishan Kumar, Murad Khetani and Pranay Reddy Vanga under T-Series Films, Bhadrakali Pictures and Cine1 Studios. The film stars Ranbir Kapoor, alongside Anil Kapoor, Bobby Deol, Rashmika Mandanna and Tripti Dimri. In the film, Ranvijay "Vijay" learns about an assassination attempt on his father Balbir Singh, where he sets out to exact revenge. - บันเทิง
![คุณอาเรียโต๊ะข้างๆ พูดรัสเซียหวานใส่ซะหัวใจจะวาย ตอนที่ 2 [ซับไทย] 【Ani-One Thailand】](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kbbfYakMY8k/mqdefault.jpg)
ho gaya bass khatam. nikal gayi system se movie
When Directors can't make good stories their only focus is on s**, Nu**ty and Violence
@@ssh854like Vanga , his fans also copy paste same things again and again because of lack of creativity 😅
"Hey guys, let's take this opportunity to make another video about this film we don't agree with because of its social narrative that we don't want to push, and while doing that we will get some more attention"
Mam you wasted your time...for you there was only one scene of 5seconds ...in the very end😅😅
@@Ok99012parasites these guys bro
The trick is to make a deliberately polarising film. Supporters will watch just to rub it in the face of the 'critics' and the haters will watch to write an informed criticism, quality of the film not withstanding. The filmmaker laughs his way to the bank.
GENIUS strategy 😎🔥💪🏽
Absolutely😅😅
All this is fine but the final product has to be entertaining ,
thats all required for people to enjoy and come in high numbers
It's not like these critics are watching these films like you fools multiple times especially if they didn't like it. Maybe they got a free ticket as part of their job. How would you know? After this video, they have moved on! Where are you???
@@akashrana1812 movie is subjective kisi ko tarak mehta is best tv show lgta h kisi ko rrr
Don't you think in order to have a fruitful discussion you need to have someone who liked the film in the panel.. what's the point on all three who liked or disliked having a discussion!
Wokes out of their echo chambers are literally fish out of water.
Most of the people who like this movies are brainless. So that won't be no discussion with them
Most educated people or anyone who respects cinema DID NOT LIKE Anima;. Even if Satyajit Ray was alive, he would have not liked Animal!
@@nikitamohan3390 It's not about who liked or disliked it. Any debate is meaningful only if the discussion covers the point of view from both the sides. There is no proof which says educated people disliked the film. In that case, overseas collections should be less which is not the case. I don't know why you brought Satyajit Ray into this discussion because you can never prove it to me that HE disliked the film.
@@layasrirajesh9453 And why would overseas collections be less??? Are you implying that Indians are less educated than overseas NRIs??? Lol thanks for proving your blatant lack of education if you don't even know that India has some of the world's top scientists, engineers, doctors, army and navy people, etc. Utter stupidity. Of course most of those people don't even have the time to watch most of the mediocre Indian movies but if you forced them to watch Animal, if they could sit through even half an hour, I KNOW they wouldn't like it either!
Instead of adding to the animal chatter, isn’t it better to review a deserving movie by the name Sam Bahadur? It’s ironic that TH-cam influencers take greater effort to bad mouth a movie vs spread the good word about a movie
Because they get views from negativity and clout
@@gaurakshak213yes Bhai
Before animal she had very less views now look at the views
She wants to milk the negativity
I don’t think they really care much about the movie. They wanna get their share of views in the name of animal. The best revenge for the critics against vanga would be to give more space for Sam Bahadur n praise tat. But clearly they wanna just encash in the success of animal n get more viewership got themselves. ( can’t blame them )
Did you idiots even watch the stream ?? She talked about it.
They are film critics, their job is not only to pay attention to "deserving" films. For better or for worse films like Kabir Singh and Animal have become a sort of cultural artefact, reflecting the times we're living in. Conversations and reviews like this are important so we can have a record of how different people reacted to divisive films/cultural artefacts as we move into the future. If all reasonable people decided that this movie and others like it aren't worth talking about, then all the conversation about this would be from those supporting and celebrating it, I'm sure the downsides of that are pretty clear. Everyone has the right to criticise.
This is what vanga wanted. And finally he got what he anticipated.
The director got so pissed off by critics that he added unnecessary scenes just for rage bait 😂
“Anger can be a weapon … if you control it. … You clearly cannot,” - Kratos
@@asthapurohit2666 he is highly professional The job of directors is to please the audience, not the critics
@@Zim-B00B-Cdid you read the original comment buddy?
Last scene specifically added for these critics😅😅
@@asthapurohit2666 Yes,did you understand the context of original comments buddy , critics were crying during Kabir Singh but audience were exited about the film ,he know the taste of audience so he raised intensity
These movie reviewers acting like if they have some personal grudge against Sandeep Reddy Vanga !!
Post modernists are bound to hate these kinds of movies.
The problem is everyone's not a post modernist.
They mistakenly think they are “the good guys” instead, as does every post modernist.
They're not post mordanists.
THEY are radical feminist conservatives
@@xdsuicidesheep599
I don't think you understand what post modernism is. :)
@@saquibhussain4789 I do. But a certain ideology doesn't define an era as a whole. The future belongs to each and every human being, it's NOT a woman's World.
Don't you think that the Luv Ranjan movies kinda primed the audience to accept and expect the kinda movies Vanga is bringing?
😂😂😂😂😂😂 true to an extent.
Lol, the most amusing thing is the attempts of feminists to make sense of this movie’s success. Every single reason they come up with shows just how divorced from reality they are.
@@BigBen2018 Enlighten us with the reality then 😂
@@veda6831 Reality is that people like it for reasons that feminists simply seem unable to comprehend. The reasons they concoct usually just blanket judge and assign character deficiency judgements because that’s the only way they can reconcile their ideologies (real ones, not the rosy sounding equality bullshit) with the fact that hordes of men love the movie, moved to tears even in some of the scenes. According to you they are less evolved Neanderthals that need to be civilized and educated and taught life wisdom 101 right?
Luv Rajan could get very misogynistic but not deranged, not immoral
“Anger can be a weapon … if you control it. … You clearly cannot,”- Kratos
When saw animal, i was kinda thinking about Kratos but in the first 3 games
@@KartikSingh-nm1ik after he became the animal, giving a story like kratos would have been better under the influence of rage or drugs or something. The next movie could have been redemption like God of war new games. Maybe to write all this vanga has to go to hell twice and survive to write better stories. He never shows complete breakdown
Fellow GOW enjoyer ❤
Arkantos better
@@nandishhegde9025maybe the animal trilogy and other genres he about to explore will be his redemption arc who knows
Adding salt to your wound... Animal crossed 900 crore😂😂
Plane hitting the peak and Ranbir trying to control while Rashmika trying to hold… is just a metaphor of the act they were into… come on Sucharita, this much even I understood.
Itna dimaag hota to aise faltu videos thodi na banate
Ye hai hi bevakoof bhai. Angrezi bol ke sochti hai badi intelligent hai
As SRV mentioned these jokers are illiterates. They cannot se the film holistically. They haven’t produced a a single commercial short with or without star.
Your reviews didn’t matter the box office collection. Kudos to SRV for different level of movie making. You guys better look for another job. You can’t digest newcomers ruling the different level of Bollywood. You all spoke English but then nothing seems worthless of your talk. Learn from Deeksha Sharma and she made genuine review in Hindi. Even kids liked the action movie Animal and love to hear movie songs of Animal. Kids are true to heart and it shows through box-office collection. Every sentence of your’s included SRV, that shows you are more target to the filmmaker rather than movie review. Performance is 100%, songs 100%, content 100%, audience loved completed.
He just triggered them and they lost understanding of scenes which common movie goers understood..Critics give + review and movie bombs😂😂😂😂
He called yesterday critics jokers 🤣😂
They are...
Vanga destroyed them badly, the pain on their face is more disturbing than the movie😅
public destroyed them by making movie hit
And that's what Bollywood will be, almost in shit
Lol he just proved them right that he's an asshole
Shows ur misogynist mindset bro
"did the plane crash?" You want to know that?😂
I think the problem with this movie needs to be very objectively and critically defined and discussed. Because if general problems about logics and scene completion are discussed, they exist with every-movie which you guys probably never pointed in those movies.
Scenes with shock value as a bait or a movie which is a string of shock value scenes - that is such a common phenomenon.
Every movie aims at provoking some kind of an emotion in the audience - be it laugh, cry or drama. When it is not the usual emotion, people do get uncomfortable initially.
Every film wants a reaction. A film which services a Khan aims at providing a dopamine of the heroic slow motion scenes of their hero to the fans.
This is not a new concept. Only the INTENSITY and QUANTITY of these things in ANIMAL is higher than usual.
And this Higher intensity and quantity of basic things is what triggers people whereas these same things with lower intensity when exist do not trigger anyone. Hmm..
+1
@@shrey.youtube +100
Art is always going to be subjective, unless you talk about tech usage like VFX.
You 3 should sit and watch your favourite movie SHIKARA now 😂
I think the point comes down to why are movies made. Are they made to please the masses and make money or does the director and actors have a deeper message and a story to tell... At times people dont have a message... And the masses like it. They like the fiction of the movie and then move on in their life
But it should not made to spread hate too
This was not a movie without a message, this was a movie with a very toxic message. If you’re a guy, who’s toxic and screwed up, as long as you do half of a good thing and have a quarter of good intentions, it’s ok, you’re my hero
Movie.. Cinema is the only visual purpose when u can be entertain and gives the message to the society which comes from different state with different religions.. And that's the very initiative responsibility move when u represent something which affects or teach something when u have larger public to watch.
You see at 31.25 when Sucharita talks about the idea of feminism, I feel her. I felt the same way about let’s say Mrs. Undercover or veere di wedding. Like we cringe when it’s taken somewhere else. I hope men have similar reactions on these toxic masculine movies for the same reason. This kind of rhetoric should not be acceptable to men and women alike
Well it’s making hundreds of crores so you clearly have a problem with all those rapey murderous men, which must be what everyone who isn’t offended by this movie must be because what else is possible?
@@BigBen2018 Is it because most men are potential rapists?
It should be acceptable & promoted
I have watched Sholey a thousand times. I never went on a horse to rob a village or took money to kill a daku.
Seriously as a man I was cringing the whole way through how he was acting, this movie felt like it was made by a 14 year old edgelord (which Vanga kinda is) the onlt scene I liked was at the end with his dad.
You clearly haven’t understood a lot Sucharita.
thats why she is she
Milking Negativity is an art❤
Well, that's right
Just saw 3 people not able to “take criticism” of their criticism of the film, and so came live to whine about the same.
And you came to check it out?
@@sumee5628 Wasn’t that the purpose of this live discussion? For people to check it out? Such a dumb question.
Or are you one of those who like to create an echo chamber where everyone claps and applauds at everything you do or say?
Cause having followed Sucharita, I’m quite sure, she isn’t one of those.
@kushal777 wasn't that the purpose of the film too, some people like it and some don't, and they are sharing thoughts either way? Or does the filmmaker expect an audience of echo chamber who applauds but never dislike it? Film criticism has existed for as long as films have existed. Just like comments like yours will be there as long as TH-cam videos are made.
@@jhindupur Yeah, so when did I say they aren’t allowed to criticise? Of course, they have the right to criticise anyway they want, and people have the right to respond.
Seems like you like adding bits and pieces of information into a new fact, that doesn’t exist. She has the right to criticise. Vanga has the right to make the film. We have the power to convey our thoughts.
The reason I think the movie sailed so well was the way the Ranbir's character was portrayed in the first half . Sandeep played on the minds of people who saw themselves in Ranbir's character. He lost me at the moment where protagonist was justifying himself for being with other girl for his father. Keeping feminism and all apart , I still felt wrong for the way all the females in the movie have been shown.
@@smrab1993no i think they changed it because people might not like it because it makes no sense why ranbir would do that.. i think he was supposed to leave the wife but then they chose not to
That's the point of his character Sandeep played with people by the 1st half we saw him as a revolutionary leader, protective brother,a man who reunited with other family but the moment he went into a coma that was when he started to become a complete animal by nature who do what he wants without carrying about consequences
For people who it just another movie....My problem with SRV is that he actually idealizes these things in real life too. What a toxic trait he has!
Have you seen interview of James bond actor and how he glorify women hate you will forget Sandeep remarks.
@@richardpickle5969 so some random westerner sets the benchmark?
@@nonegog5 what ? Random Westerner? he's one of the successful actors of classic 70s cinema
The movie is Adult Certified! It is meant to be watched by adult, a reasonable person in the right space of mind would know that the "hero" of the movie is not meant to be idolized. It is not Sandeep Reddy Vanga`s job to teach the population of India on how to be adults or what is right and wrong. I do not know why critics are kind of shaming people who enjoyed the movie.
The movie is clear in the message of TRAUMA causes more TRAUMA. After the interval the movie showed* that the protagonist was not well, and was losing his mind, and he did all the thing that he told his wife he would not do, by the end, Rannvijay, is an animal no sense of any direction, and did lose his whole family.
I know you guys are critics, but the only thing you have critiqued is the story and the director. BGM, cinematography, costumes, and even acting ka critique kaha he? Critics should be neutral with critiquing, lekin aap logo ka to agenda clearly dikh raha hai.
I agree with you... Their review felt like a petty attempt to belittle the director by nit picking completely subjective things. This is a petty review.
@@aryansaxena4559I agree too.. These people are not discussing anything... Jus sittg three for critising..... Real nonsense
Hota h na bhai 3 dost baith ke guppe maar rahe hn . Ye 3 loosers bus usi cheez ko TH-cam pe daal ke paise kama rahe hn
Animal was excellent in first half and kept me hooked.. I had some minor issues with the dialogue writing but overall I was hyped to see how it'll continue in the second half.. but the second half was so weak that i couldn't appreciate the film at all.. yeah Ranbir and others' acting, BGM are great but what's the point of it all when they story is this bad.. Story is the backbone of a film after all.. animal lacks badly in that department
Someone rightly said - "Animal feels like 2 movies clubbed together.. First half was written before Kabir Singh and the second half after it
Karlo abuse reviewers ko..Yehi toh chaiye tha Vanga ko..Vanga ka animal banane ka point hi yeh tha ki reviewers ko trigger kar sake aur uske fanbois unko jaake gaali de sake
Wow genius ya .
Yeh toh aur bhi chutiya motive hua movie banane ka.. yeh motive hone se yeh chutiya movie achhi ho gai??
Post credit scene was for them
its just a movie. Having a teams meeting over is such a cringe . Let people deciede what they really wants to see and the numbers have spoken for themselves.
They call themselve movie critic😂😂
Critics crying is music to ears. These people crying is more entertaining than the movie 😂😂
I don’t get people saying I won’t watch coz of violence
Movie is for entertainment!!! U have horror, terrorist film, crime etc etc
Maybe they wont get entertained.
Cause for some ppl violence is not entertaining? How difficult is it to understand that not everyone has the same taste as you?
I had some issues with the film, but to retort to some of your specific criticisms:
1) why is there a scene when the plane almost crashes, and it just cuts- I think that is meant to show that while his alphaness sweeps geetanjali of her feet, it's this madness/alphaness that is also going to put them in danger. That he is actually not in control. They obviously survive so it doesn't crash, and showing them survive and is unnecessary as the point of the scene is already made.
2) in the end when Ranbir is crying and the camera slowly pans up to show that it's Shakti Kapoor, your complain was that there was no point to it, what does it show about the father son relationship - this one seems pretty obvious to me, the scene before with his father Ranbir acts strong, he walks away from his dad, then he breaks down revealing his true feelings but he can't do that in front of his dad, he can't show that weakness to him, his pride gets in the way, he can only do it in front of his uncle. The slow pan up to reveal it's Shakti Kapoor shows clear intention and acknowledgement from vanga about this intent to differentiate
End credits is for critics
So true😂😂😂
Self indulgent nonsense . 😂the irony 😂
It was not an honest film for you Rahul coz you already have a prejudice and pre conceived notions against Vanga, accept the effing fact. Here you are in a 40 min discussion about a film you absolutely disdain with all your heart. I guess not only Vanga is triggered, y’all are too.
Haters... it is a entertainment. Go and enjoy and be done. Who the he.. have so much of time to check and what is supposed to be done and what's not supposed to be done. Whoever is speaking without watching the movie and criticizing someone's efforts. Jobless people
I just watched the movie. I is fantasy. It had cringing moments but it did not bored me that much because you know what you can expect from a Sandeep Reddy Vanga movie. Watch it came home. Liked it
Shhh that makes you subhuman
05:00 the dude says I haven't thought that deeply about the writing of this film. That tells me all I need to know about the preparation and thought put into this.
Like you said, all the players know what's up. And we know how you guys love anurag kashyap even after gangs of wasseypur ka misogyny. Toh apna Banda karein toh art, dusra Banda karein toh fart.
Your hypocrisy isn't surprising either 😂
Keep coping, love this sad corner of the internet.
Jokers can only can review and criticize, but can't really make a product.
In that sense your father is a joker too. Cause your uncle and your mom made you. Thanks.
@@RoyRudraPrasad you made yourself by time travelling in past to the date when your mom first night.
Product?
Sandeep said : It will be more violent . Ranbir said : If you are easily triggered don't watch the movie . Sensor board : It's A rated movie . Animal : Animal behaviour is based on its instinct and that's the core theme of the movie ... having said all of these you have watched the movie and doing over action on live for more views and subscribers ...Just time for getting more subscribers and you earn lot of money with these Live.
Then they should made this film and watched it on TV instead of showing it in cinema.
@@gyansahu2894 it's for you to decide whether to watch the movie or not ..also it's for your matured mind to decide whether to take any inspiration from movie or stay away from it..Coming to my personal opinion I liked the taking of the movie and high adrenaline rush moments but at the same time I saw it as a movie and not my life so I didn't get much carried away with it...Just doing my regular jobs and having my peaceful live ...
It's high time these guys should be jobless. We have censor board to tell us what should be watched and who should watch it. We don't need these parasites.
@@gyansahu2894kya chutiya logic
@@user-xy3uk8wf3q it is also my and reviewers right to Express their opinion about the movie. And if movie glorifies crimes, misogyny and most importantly boring then people will talk about that. Telling them to not express is not a logical argument. Make better movie u will get good reviews.
They don't care about Animal so much that they made a whole longgg video about it 😂
my favourite part about people defending this movie is them saying feminists cannot handle this because it has disturbing themes??😭 Most people ik have consumed darker and more disturbing, problematic content (made in abyss) cuz it serves the story or the story has some trade offs (asoiaf - uses classic misogynistic tropes but also has some of the best women written in fiction). Again intent of the creator matters a lot
Dear Sucharita, I've always loved your reviews, which probably also means that I agree with most of your opinions. Having said that, the trailer was enough for me to decide that this movie was not for me. Films are subjective, there is no one size fits all equation where we all love the same movies. As always, thank you for your candid reviews and for not succumbing to the pressure of placating big movie stars. ♥
Pressure of placating! Wahh. So much Pressure
Haa she has the Pressure of Modi Ji and whole Nation wants to see her Review...
@@tsr0911 modi meleoni ko pata raha h 😮
I was very excited for the movie after watching the teaser, but the trailer let me down big time. The echoes of papa papa papa, a child with daddy issues who goes on a rage to kill any one just to get the dads approvel. Not for me .
I saw the trailer and took my family (mom, dad) to watch it. First day.
And despite knowing his views during Kabir Singh. I had a clue (vague anticipation) but didn't think it would be this bad..
Congratulations for 100k Sucharita!
Trust me even as a man it can be triggering to see these characters glorified on big screen when you have experience of dealing with them in real life.
You are a buffoon man, it's just a movie that takes a different take and direction from traditional bollywood, these type of movie do exists in the world of cinema.
Trust you bro
She calls her viewers faceless and nameless, says a lot about her character , I pitty her viewers
I love these looooong reviews. Thank you for all the insights.
P.S. Rahul and Ishita kindly invest in a mike 🙌
public is loving it bs baat khtm 3 days 356 cr cry hard
Public also loves porn😂. Go ahead promote it
Whoever posted "Brother-in-law dies" at 22:11, his brother-in-law does not die; he brutally kills him, and the audience wanted to know. The way he explained that part is terrific. There are flaws in the film, but at least give credit where it's due. Really? Are you folks disappointed about the jump cutting in 'The flight scene'? It's brilliant the way he jump cuts the scene to an even more interesting one. Do you really want to know how the obvious thing happened? The director had a better plan for the audience, and it worked tremendously. Strictly speaking, you can sincerely talk about the cinematic flaws, and that would be more constructive. Even if you disagree on this platform, you folks know how brilliant Sandeep is when he chooses to be. So why don't you just give honest feedback? If you keep beating the drum in the same lines like you did for Kabir Singh, it does not help the cause.
I feel extremely bad for tripti. After such classy movies, she degraded heraelf for this
She loves ranbir a fan girl she would nothing to be in that movje and people need money
Exactly. All her laurels gone in one cameo!
Ironically your Profile pic is Korean.
But look at the exposure she got with movie . So many ppl will watch her , her Instagram following has skyrocketed. So she has benefitted and it’s good for her career .
@@meghasingh9294 It's sad that outsider actresses have to do such cringe stuff for success and stardom though.
Happy to see critics cry .. ha ha.. when wil these people understand a movie is just a movie thats it..dont know these guys keep saying film is bad and the movie gets numbers thats never expected 😂😂 and the fact is these people never know what is ground reality😮
Ground reality is soft po"" is more popular than good story...Toda nud***, s***, Violence aur trigger karne wale dialogues like mockery of Menstruation, ladko ko bolna Mera juta chat dhaldo B grade movie bhi hit..😅
@@kirandas5373it's a 'A' certified by censor.. and what u expect from that.. it made for a target audience and they received it well..
@kirandas5373 acha. If it is successful formula everyone would have done that. Government would have stake in that. There would be a minister for that.
@@hearthrob29 it's a A rated movie...She excused that by saying soo much violence is there..But actually unnecessary nu** scenes they added...Tripti Dimri And Ranbir Kapoor were shown n***.. It's not even necessary for the plot...now Tarki people are watching it😂🤣..Also dialogues like Asking a girl lick my shoe, mock menstruation, saying in a marriage man should dominate, mocking wife it's time you will get a slap from me as if it's soo normal basically Andrew Tate fans are making this movie a hit 🤣 Boys are cheering in theatre when he choked his wife, or mock menstruation...So I guess they are the actual audience of Vanga 😅
@@kirandas5373 unnecessary tereliye. Kyon dekha
Usually I am respectful to critics me being one but seriously this is nothing but petty belittling of a movie made with love and effort.
These people see vanga and his fans as absolutely subhuman. It’s a very twisted Marxist way of viewing people and their characters.
Please help link ishita Sengupta’s animal review here . I googled but couldn’t find :(
Congratulations Sucharita for 100K. Keep up the good work. cheers.
Hey guys, do you review any classics? Let's see your review of Raging Bull.
Gand fhat ke ajayegi inki
Sorcese prabhu ko kese criticise kar sakte hai
Why’s it like we start ranting anything and everything that doesn’t go with my value system?
I might have spent more time reading and watching critics reviews than the content from movie itself. Having fun around it❤
The truth is they are shaken and assembled to reassure each other about their judgement.
More than the movie itself I enjoy Sucharita & Anupama reviews of Sandeep Reddy Vanga movies 😀😀
Even u know ur lying... quit simping over this dogfaced suchirita & her grandma anupama.
Animal is good movie. In terms of writing, screenplay, editing, and direction.
@@suvnan09yes, it has a story line , father and son relationship, a son can go to any extent to protect his father. Basic things you didn't get to your brain and these are called critics.
Then RGV, now SRV , shook the Bollywood 😂😂
The rise of the plane symbolizes the rise of the character of Ranvir Kapoor to his defined male hood. That was the point of the plane scene
Not SANDEEP, you guys are smart. Living on his movie and reaction. He doesn't care about you.
True bro. These people are trying to create a content which get more views.
All the millions of people watching the movie around the globe and enjoying themselves must be wondering what these three strange beings talking about. They sound so bored with life and themselves😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣
Do you guys watch Tarantino movies?
This movie is only the start of the story. Vanga has a bigger picture in mind , which shows right from the first scene in 2056. This movie by the end already has multiple sub plots which will come out later. Its a larger than life movie and its non linear . Thats a different cinematic style not to go too much into details
Also want to point out: would the filmmaker dare film smoking in a guradwara and listening to lovemaking noises in a gurdwara? What makes Vanga and hindi film makers think that it's okay to show churches being used like this? very offensive.
Because Christians keep quiet and do not react when their community is tarnished. Sikhs would ensure Vanga had his ass handed to him if he showed smoking or sex sounds in gurdwara.
@@amanjotsingh6351 Not true, Punjab Christians booked a case against comedian Bharti Singh for a disrespectful joke around the word "Alleluia" - she was kept busy for quite a while over this. Seriously, mainstream Hindi cinema which Vanga is catering to has crossed the lines many times with impunity and the Censor Board has allowed it to as well.
@@gbookclub4946 Why are Christians silent on Animal then?
TH-cam critics are genuine critics than these so called elite critics.. They only live in their own world..they don't know what is world outside their planet 😂😂😂
😂 and Bollywood trusted these elite critic's by loosing it's own single screen audience
The problem with the film is the film desperately wanted to be a classic gangster film like Scarface or Godfather 2.Tried to create drama through long conversation between characters,protagonist is dealing with different issues with different characters in one location ,(Specifically in2nd half)etc.But for all these things the director needs to have a great staging sense…Like Asgar farhidi,Hirokazu etc… So he failed…No THE FILM IS NOT ORIGINAL.You take the protagonist of scarface and put him in the world of Godfather 2 and sprinkle some action …You get Animal…
Sorry off the topic , ranbir kapoor looks so much like Al Pacino younger version face like in godfather ..very similar features both hav
Yes I did think Vanga was inspired by Godfather and Scarface. Some scenes are total copy
These three did not understand the crying scene and call themselves critic where the scene was so obvious, Sandeep created the scene to establish that all the hustle bustle, Sin, wrong things Ranbir's character did gave him nothing, his father still thinks he's a criminal, he can't face him as proud son even after killing his potential killer, he can't cry on his father's shoulders and he needs someone else's shoulder to cry on.
That scene you're talking in which Ranbir was crying on shakti Kapoor shoulder was to showcase that no matter what happens but men will never be able to showcase their emotions fully infront of their fathers.
Ranbir The Actor Is Back 😊😊
They did a 300 crore movie to piss-off reviewers???? Self obsessed to the core.
How is this a review ? It’s a hate group who can’t handle a concept outside their perspective. She literally says she’s hurt by the movie , as a reviewer you gotta have an objective view at it
Haha tell me about it. The most shining piece of analysis was “This movie constantly triggered us, so obviously the directors vision was a feminist-critic-butt-whipping fiesta, so the director wasn’t honest because he was so fixated on our butts and the whips instead of what he wants to make”.
Generally a review is about what was it the reviewer liked in the movie and what could have been better or avoided. This is just 44-03 minutes tantrum
They are moral policing the movie , a critic doesn’t crib about the parts they didn’t like for 40 mins , there are multiple aspects to look into like songs , cinematography, frame setting, edits ,locations , background score etc etc They’re fake critics , there’s no professionalism
I didn’t know TH-cam guidelines allowed masturbation videos
These critics are thinking they are on par with the director and he has got nothing to do. Why these people can't direct?
Bec they are critics? Like do you hear yourself 🤣🤣
I needed to hear these conversation to get animal out of my system as well..!!
What a bunch of jokers and hypocrites these critics are.. They hate SRV. Still will go and watch his movie, ofcourse they’ll hate the movie and talk more about it.. THESE LOSERS JUST WANT CLICKS AND VIEWS
Its a movie!!!!! Watch it or not its just a character in a story like a million others all over the world!
Go watch archies. Animal is not meant for you guys to analyse. Beyond your intellectual abilities
🤣
He says there is no definition for an "Honest film" and goes on saying Animal is not a honest film. 😅😂
One word...."ANIMAL", The title shows up in the character in every scene, Why are we missing this and finding moralities in animalistic character. It's so bloody satisfying to see this kind of characters rather boring characters where the grey characters are not at all grey. Everybody is taking the movie as a Sandeep's reaction to society rather than character becoming an animal. Animals are very instinctive ,that's how his reactions will be in every scene of the movie, either Action or emotion scenes.
So much of disrespect towards Sandeep and making fun of him. And You don't want him to call you Jokers.
They said what they felt while watching the movie. If Sandeep Vanga Reddy can't take criticism, then why is he even making films? If he has his right to defend his films, then other people have the right to critise him as well.
@@cometstar4050 It is alright to criticise the film not the targetting the person and labelling him as something. Even a person who made one short film will understand the magic in the transitions used in the first half of the film.
Agreed, As U said if the way they are criticising it without any objectivity and targetting him. Then he is correct calling them Jokers.
Stupid discussions.. director thinks out of box and made a different and amazing movie.
I already watched 4 times and loved acting of all actors.
maan lo.. people are not obsessed with an ordinary movie. Sucharita tyagi is confused as it got into her system too.. she is not able to ignore it.
Movie m real don dawood ko hero dikhate h tab morality kaha jati h kya dawood feminist tha 💀
Can't agree more. Fiction must be taken with a pinch of salt.. iss tarah mandali baithake burai karna Shobha nhi deta. 😄
So kill bill can be made but this film is a problem. If actors play white all the time critics have a problem. They play grey you have problem. They play dark you have a problem. Films banana band kar dete hai aur kya. If you have a different taste that’s fine but if you are a critic talk about execution and not subjectivity. Film ki politics ko judge karna nahi hota hai critic ka kaam.
These three have no other job, and their opinions are not as important as they think. The pilot, Rahul, is so amazing. If he had not told us how autopilot works, we would have been totally fooled by Sandeep. I hope Rahul also gives his deep views on the practicality of the Big gun they used in the interval scene. Based on this outstanding review, Bhushan and Vanga are making movies for these three guys to criticize and then adapt their next movies. Also, Rahul please let us know if the heart transplantation was done technically correctly? Sandeep is a bully? Sucharita- it okay if its john hopkins or Johns hopkins- he was crying on shakti Kapoor's shoulder because its later time point after his father died. They should have shown how they recovered backbox the film is really short it could have added some more time. Ishita- they should have made worse dads' characters? bunch of m**rons.
come on man they really took the bait! and they are not ready to accept it!! these people are calling this a toxic film, and give positive criticism for some of the movies that come from netflix like woman having extra marital affiar just for her physical needs and they even justify it. they just dont like sandeep reddy vanga..!!!
@@shashankyempati2085 Pure haters they are!! They actually don't know how cinema works even in india!!
They sound good in reviews; but here they became just pedestrian ordinary entities. And that is good.
Their analytical skills match their ordinary wits. Glad I saw this for the time I did.
Because ma'am father log aise he react karte hai , everyone had different childhood 😢
rahul bhai aapne kitini movie banayi hai bhai ek movie bana phier hit karwa phier bolna ki sandeep ko movie bana na nahi aata
I also needed it out of my system!
36:36 John Wick also didn't have any police... tab kaha thee JOKERS☕️😂
When jokers roam around calling themselves film critics. 😅
From grandparents to cousins, the entire family appears to grapple with inherited psychological issues, possibly linked to neuropsychiatric disorders-a genetic aspect. I'm uncertain if Mr. Vanga acknowledged this while writing. It's disheartening to think some men view this as the ideal alpha male, and it's equally concerning if women associate selfless love with sacrificing self-respect.
First half he was alpha going towards toxicity but after the fight he becomes Animal.
One of the fuckin best film in Bollywood
Believe me guys it is because of disjointment and disconnected screen play film holding up the audience 3hr 21 min otherwise if it is on same pace it will be boring.
Point to be noted . Even RGV told same
So fuckin true man. People would've hated it if it was just violence from start to end
8:40 I maybe reading too much into it, but it felt like visual foreshadowing of how their relationship is gonna turn out - initially all hunky dory but then its bound to crash land.
That tyagi girl !
Hey Critics ..... are you saying...Audience are fools to make it the Biggest Blockbuster Movie of All time .Chill guys
The point is simple because the movie's good and people are enjoying it, is the reason why they're trying to prove it wrong because they didn't like something. I strongly believe they too enjoyed the film and also the movie is a big success, they couldn't accept it
I look forward to reviews including yours.. before deciding to watch a movie.. keep them coming please 😊
You guys need a therapy . Matlab kuch bhi bologe.
Everything was perfect about the film
I live in Phoenix USA and believe me couldn't find the tickets Oi over the weekend. People are cheering for this
Its like Fight Club of Indian Movies!! Out of the box cult magic....Animal was not supposed to be Human!! Yes, he went a little bit overboard at times, but still kept everyone entertained for 3+ hrs.... nobody flinched in theatre for that duration.
Please don't insult fight club
That's a crime man ....how can you compare this trash to Fight club?
Chup
Im a film student and trying every day to make a short film , I understand what a film is , also I understand that u guys don’t even know an inch of filmmaking , do something substantial, something meaningful which ur good at
Its ok to restart
But its not ok to become a legit pseudo
Try to make a 2 minute short film guys
That plane scene
Signifies hero’es character graph
Its a metophprical representation like how his life was down bad like that plane and now he took charge of it and survived and he rises high after that point
Cut to the berded ranbir who is leading the gang🔥
Perfect screenplay
You should be a noob not to understand this🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
❤ absolutely