Statics: Lesson 51 - Trusses, Method of Sections, Truss Tips and Tricks

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 69

  • @hallfamily2141
    @hallfamily2141 4 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    Just wanted to update. I'm about halfway through the semester now. Currently have a 99 (highest score in the class). My professor is very pleased. Can't thank you enough for giving me a head start this semester. Really has helped me balance school, work, and life. Thanks Professor Hanson and Professor Zaurin!

  • @donejoubert7995
    @donejoubert7995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    All I can say is "WOW!" As a first-year engineering student, I found these truss problems extremely daunting but these tips, tricks and other videos helped so much! I actually feel more confident to write my test later today thanks to you Prof Hanson!!

    • @tkdyt0674
      @tkdyt0674 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DaljeetSingh-yv7ch 💀💀

    • @taimurahmad
      @taimurahmad 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@DaljeetSingh-yv7ch hello saar we like waamen saar

  • @alexvaldes4597
    @alexvaldes4597 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I gotta say it. You are a pretty fantastic teacher. Honestly one of the best I've seen. you are doing a great service here, thank you

  • @Jon_Iker
    @Jon_Iker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    i would die without jeff hanson, if i could have jeff for every engineering class i would in a heartbeat.

  • @wesleydutoit6901
    @wesleydutoit6901 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Haha was confused with min: 6:36 until i listened carefully to his lil song - "If the force is in the Y then the distance is in the X". I did not know that. Makes Moment much more clear now!

  • @helpontheway5404
    @helpontheway5404 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Lol I love that you always make me laugh and learn something new at the same time.
    Much love Jeff

  • @9LimaAlpha7
    @9LimaAlpha7 ปีที่แล้ว

    my gosh i gotta say, u wont find someone other than prof hanson solving questions with such sense of humour!

  • @leta3713
    @leta3713 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like watching this type of video. It really feels as if you are in a real classroom. Appreciate it, Jeff!

  • @lukkie7118
    @lukkie7118 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, you made everything sound easier than what I learned from my uni… Thank you!

  • @tesfayebabore6862
    @tesfayebabore6862 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    dear engineer, doctor, You are joy of engineers! I am happy to join you.

  • @justinecustorio2393
    @justinecustorio2393 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    he's the best engineering teacher out there I swear

  • @Mackyanguson
    @Mackyanguson 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wish I could find this tutorial 4 years a go when I was doing my studies.. but it doesn't matter i still love this...statics

  • @alexwhetstone4464
    @alexwhetstone4464 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    this guys an absolute legend

  • @mikefaraday1720
    @mikefaraday1720 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    These tips are very helpful in helping me go fast. Thank you. Particularly the bit about taking moments at a point just outside the chosen section. It came in very handy on a question I was solving.

  • @manuboker1
    @manuboker1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful Statics lessons!! really taking the time to explain the problems along with a good sense of humor :))

  • @RK-tx5xb
    @RK-tx5xb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Hints professor. Well explained.

  • @markangelodavid8531
    @markangelodavid8531 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    you are awesome sir! hoping to be as good as you! God bless!

  • @keithspears5073
    @keithspears5073 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video. Learned a lot.
    at 10.47 a point is reached where 2 equations are formed that Jeff then solves using a programmable calculator.
    I would suggest solving using the simple method of 'simultaneous equations' :-
    If equation #2 is subtracted from equation #1 then you get only one unknown, which is Fe.
    This is then easily solved and results in Fe = 9.49.
    If this answer is then plugged into equation #1, or #2 you then get Be as '-12' and not '8.49'.
    Am I wrong?

    • @zunaidhassan9662
      @zunaidhassan9662 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are simultaneous equations. Solving with calculator is a preference and may reduce errors for some. Subtracting equation 2 from equation 1 will give FE = -9.49 N. Plugging this value in either equation 1 or 2 will give BE = 8.49 N:
      Equation 1: BE = (- 3 - 0.949 (- 9.49)) / 0.707 ≈ 8.49 N
      Equation 2: BE = (9 + 0.316 (- 9.49)) / 0.707 ≈ 8.49 N

    • @theotema2053
      @theotema2053 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      for BE I got -12/sin45 which is like 16.97...

  • @conorleach7996
    @conorleach7996 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    rockstar thank you for the A on my exam!!! :)

  • @georgesadler7830
    @georgesadler7830 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Professor Hanson, thank you once again for a massive example that outline Trusses, Methods of Sections, Truss Tips and Tricks. These examples are fun.

  • @DanteDoyon
    @DanteDoyon 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    THANKS

  • @tejara01
    @tejara01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    7:00 what about CD?

  • @dankmemer2774
    @dankmemer2774 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just learned truss as I am completing my quiz on truss. 30 min for a multi part truss problem, barely made it.

  • @gianlucacastro5281
    @gianlucacastro5281 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you once again!!

  • @StephenShimo
    @StephenShimo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks so much

  • @abemigishapride4675
    @abemigishapride4675 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks 👍

  • @grantmoreau8467
    @grantmoreau8467 ปีที่แล้ว

    How come in the sum of the forces in the x at 8:11, does he not include the force Fed in the equation

  • @donnynowak2795
    @donnynowak2795 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What is the "system solver" you talk about using I have a Ti-84 and would like to know how to access this.

    • @ivettechatman9126
      @ivettechatman9126 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i believe he's talking about what would be the matrix function on the ti-84. you need to press 2nd then x-inverse scroll to edit to fill out the matrix, then 2nd mode, to exit then 2nd x-inverse scroll to the middle find rref, short cut to there should be ALPHA then B, 2ND X-inverse again select in the NAMES list the matrix you entered then hit enter and it will solve your equation. if you are unfamiliar with matrix equations i suggest looking up videos on what they are. Its a function used extensively in Linear Algebra.

    • @1234jhanson
      @1234jhanson  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Check out my videos on how to use your calculator!

    • @WEREBACKoCOM
      @WEREBACKoCOM 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      you use( A^-1)*(B) where A and B are matrices. Works exactly the same as the system solver on his calculator. You most definitely learned the matrix way in an algebra course

    • @z.r1999
      @z.r1999 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@1234jhanson i am unable to find it ...can u plz insert the link here

  • @jasminerichards4159
    @jasminerichards4159 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry sir ,for sum of Fy at point E , should it not be "-6kN" instead of "-9" ? Also thank you for all the help and video content , we really appreciate it

    • @zunaidhassan9662
      @zunaidhassan9662 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There is 6 kN and 3 kN force pointing in negative y-axis, so together they make -9 kN.

  • @TheKSRBroadcast2Home
    @TheKSRBroadcast2Home 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I'd use a calculator with a system solver if it were allowed. I can't so I gotta stick with good old fashion lin. algebra and a simple scientific calculator

  • @ethancorrea948
    @ethancorrea948 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Every thought about teaching at Georgia Tech? As a student i endorse it

  • @CliffStamp
    @CliffStamp 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    When doing the equilibrium equations, hoe come you do not have to include the non-cut members? For example at 6.36 which do you not have to include forces in the members ED and CD?

    • @brennenbazaldua6126
      @brennenbazaldua6126 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because after you make the cut these forces become internal to the system. Therefore they are not considered when solving for each external force.

  • @JumpahK
    @JumpahK 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please we want a video on space truss

  • @crazy9780
    @crazy9780 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hahaha, your right our professor lets us bring calculator but would not give a point if the equation was solved by calculator

  • @lovescrubs99
    @lovescrubs99 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    help me Jeff Hanson, you're my only hope

  • @akhimienclement9134
    @akhimienclement9134 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:07

  • @conorleach7996
    @conorleach7996 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    just subscribed 4 lyfe

  • @z.r1999
    @z.r1999 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a Question regarding finding Moment at a point which is even not in your FBD , in the case u solved Force at joint E (FE) comes out 9.49KN ..But if wetake moment at that point which is not visible normally on our FBD means at joint B my ans for (FE) comes out to be 18.96 rather than 9.49....why is it so...
    i took the distance 3m as a moment arm for (FE) for both of its component ...
    I have exam after 2 days so kindly reply that what mistake i have made
    Thank uh for these useful videos 😍

  • @godpoweregirani2823
    @godpoweregirani2823 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pls for the angles I don't know how you get the 45 and 18.42 degrees 😓anyone pls?

    • @kdwnals
      @kdwnals ปีที่แล้ว

      soh cah toa, use the toa specifically

  • @mchlcybn2406
    @mchlcybn2406 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Professor please check again the value of force BE. I think your Calculator is wrong!

  • @اساور16
    @اساور16 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    V

  • @norapowell1327
    @norapowell1327 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got 16.98 kN for BE

    • @norapowell1327
      @norapowell1327 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Instead of doing the system solver I summed moments at B and got 9.5 for FE and then summed the forces in the y to get 16.98 for BE

    • @aycaarirt
      @aycaarirt ปีที่แล้ว

      @@norapowell1327 yeah, i did the same thing, i think EB should be 16.98 kN

    • @aycaarirt
      @aycaarirt ปีที่แล้ว

      When i put the 16.98 kN into the Fx=0 equation, my equilibrium equation became zero. But if i put the 8.49 as the answer, my equation didn't equal zero.

    • @prabakaran451
      @prabakaran451 ปีที่แล้ว

      agree Nora. I calculeted the same my answer was BE = 16.97 kN in Tension.I think the mistake was in 0.7071BE - 0.949 FE = 3

    • @prabakaran451
      @prabakaran451 ปีที่แล้ว

      problem initiated by signage that's all thanks to Mr.Hanson who delvered a very good lecture. TQ Mr.Hanson

  • @keithspears5073
    @keithspears5073 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    should have written 0.707 Be =-12, therefore Be = -16.976kN.

    • @lemmonfort7150
      @lemmonfort7150 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      agree

    • @mchlcybn2406
      @mchlcybn2406 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are right. I think He’s BE is wrong!

    • @norapowell1327
      @norapowell1327 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mchlcybn2406 I got that too!

    • @oximas-oe9vf
      @oximas-oe9vf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      it's 6 not -12
      9-3 not 9+3

    • @oximas-oe9vf
      @oximas-oe9vf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mchlcybn2406 no it's correct recheck your work