@@energy-sapped6184 you can't get assigned a degree from TH-cam tho, although I have legitimately thought about just creating my own firm without a degree because if you own the business and know what you're doing, you don't need credentials for the job lol
My professor literall just told us that triangles are better than quadrilaterals for 30 minutes and than said that trig can be used to find little forces in the triangles. And that was it.
I've never seen an online tutorial for a difficult class laid out so plainly and easy to understand. There were no equations left out that I was expected to just know. I felt like I was kept in the loop of his thinking the ENTIRE time which is exactly what I need when I learn. So thank you Jeff. Absolute life saver
This is Amazing! I nearly cried in a 3.5-hour statics class when I couldn't get this topic. Searched TH-cam, got this video..... and in 19 minutes I got my aha moment! And it is free.... who beats that! Thank you, Jeff!
This guy helped me become the structural engineer I am today (3 years practicing), even passed with first class honours. Thanks again Sir, I owe you my skills I have today.
my professor for statics is terrible. he changes policy left and right and his lectures are unclear and he does not break down problems properly. i have an exam on monday and i was freaking out, terribly. your videos are saving me and i am beginning to understand trusses now. i love you kind stranger, your videos are saving me. all love from a mechanical engineering student at georgia tech
Thanks so much. This really helped me understand where I was messing up with carrying the negative signs. I now understand that when you go to another joint you carry the magnitude but the positive or negative x,y component is relative to the x,y coordinate of the joint. So if a force is positive on one joint it could be negative on the same line of action at another joint.
Appreciate all your time in creating quality videos. Going to be sitting for the PE exam this October. Nice to get brushed up on all the methods of solving problems.
Thank you so much. My statics teacher doesn't really teach us at all. I bought the teachers solution guide to teach myself from the solutions, but chapter 6 has been really hard for me to figure out on my own even with the guide. Your video's are so helpful.
Very helpful in breaking down the method. I went and watched the Solids: Lesson 2 traffic light video to better understand the portion during Joint B where he's naming the component vectors (4/5BD; 3/5BD vs. BDcos(53.13); BDsin(53.13). Great for architects studying for their PDD Exam! Thank you!
The method of joints is strongly analogous to node-voltage analysis in electronics; you can sort of think of the forces as "currents", and the joints as "nodes".
DR. Hanson ,thank you for a detail explanation of Trusses and the Method of Joints. Trusses and Joints also relies on past chapters for a solid solution.
Jeff, I miss your old videos. You've simplified all your calculations so everything simplifies/cancels out. You actually used to do some tricky problems, but I get it. You had to remake all of these videos for McGraw Hill and I don't blame you for making your job easier. You're only second best to your original videos.
There is a mistake at the end when we are looking at joint C. Please help In the Y direction we have Fy = 0 = 11 (reaction force) - CDxSin45 = 11 - 0,7CD Therefore CD = 15.56 However Sin 45 = Cos 45 = 0.7 So in X direction we have Fx = 10 (BC) - CDxCos45 = 10 - 0,7 CD Which means CD = 14.28 There must be a mistake somewhere because if the angle is 45, which it is, BC and the 11kN reaction force must be equal. Can someone help me figure it out.
you have been my lecturer for almost 2 years at this point. thanks a lot.
Pay for college, learn from youtube
Hello sir please i need a help
u can stop paying then, unless you unwillingly go to college
@@energy-sapped6184 you can't get assigned a degree from TH-cam tho, although I have legitimately thought about just creating my own firm without a degree because if you own the business and know what you're doing, you don't need credentials for the job lol
@@fosahromeo8322 Can I help?
Facts
This 19 minute video has taught me more about Trusses than my hour and a half class did. Thank you !!
Not really. There's a harder question or problem in MOJ
My professor literall just told us that triangles are better than quadrilaterals for 30 minutes and than said that trig can be used to find little forces in the triangles. And that was it.
I agree🥲
That's because you already had taken a look into the matter
facts
I've never seen an online tutorial for a difficult class laid out so plainly and easy to understand. There were no equations left out that I was expected to just know. I felt like I was kept in the loop of his thinking the ENTIRE time which is exactly what I need when I learn. So thank you Jeff. Absolute life saver
This is Amazing! I nearly cried in a 3.5-hour statics class when I couldn't get this topic. Searched TH-cam, got this video..... and in 19 minutes I got my aha moment! And it is free.... who beats that! Thank you, Jeff!
I love you mr Hanson ❤
A student from Iraq 🇮🇶 ❤️
I've not seen someone like this in my life.. May God reward u
You're an absolute boss, Jeff. These videos are better for learning than the $300 textbook and the $1000 class I'm currently taking. Thank you!!!
I am become Engineer, practitioner of the Method of Joints. Thank you! This was super helpful!
This guy helped me become the structural engineer I am today (3 years practicing), even passed with first class honours. Thanks again Sir, I owe you my skills I have today.
my professor for statics is terrible. he changes policy left and right and his lectures are unclear and he does not break down problems properly. i have an exam on monday and i was freaking out, terribly. your videos are saving me and i am beginning to understand trusses now. i love you kind stranger, your videos are saving me.
all love from a mechanical engineering student at georgia tech
Am obsessed with woop voice fr
Tnx for showing it really helped me
Thanks so much. This really helped me understand where I was messing up with carrying the negative signs. I now understand that when you go to another joint you carry the magnitude but the positive or negative x,y component is relative to the x,y coordinate of the joint. So if a force is positive on one joint it could be negative on the same line of action at another joint.
Appreciate all your time in creating quality videos. Going to be sitting for the PE exam this October. Nice to get brushed up on all the methods of solving problems.
Perennial thanks to my beloved prof Jeff Hanson making truss analysis so simple and yet made me hooked to your lecture with rapt attention span
You're the GOAT of statics!
This video finally gave me the "Aha!" moment that I so desperately needed! Thank you!
I never comment on videos, but thank you for saving me! This clears it all up.
Why would I use McGraw Hill when I have got Jeff Hanson....
Really?
@@abdulmoeiz2672 Tu yahan bhi punch gya XD
Muhammad Ali Shah Ha statics k paper sa pichlay din yaha he ana tha na lol
GLAD TO HAVE YOU SIR. ENGINEERING WOULD NOT BE EASY BUT FOR YOU!!
I honestly don't think i'd be passing this class without these videos. Thank you so much! When I graduate, I promise I will donate to this channel!
And... did you?
@@radolearn considering I posted that 4 days ago, its safe to say I haven't graduated yet
@@terrancepage9163 Sorry man, I misread the days as years XD
I passed static with 100 points. Thx teacher
yalan söyleme Tayfun 25 aldın
@@ozansen9724 kendi notunla karıştırmış olabilirsin 😊
@@tayfunerdogan8644 senin sınavını ben okudum tayfun kes sesini
@@ozansen9724 kafa gitmiş senin. Bı doktora görün.
Thank you so much. My statics teacher doesn't really teach us at all. I bought the teachers solution guide to teach myself from the solutions, but chapter 6 has been really hard for me to figure out on my own even with the guide. Your video's are so helpful.
Am I missing something? Isn't the angle @ joint B tan-1(4/3) = 53.13 degrees?
edit: ah, video clarifies this later. thank you.
hhhhh:)dude so do i
I remember this as angle opposite to 3 is 36.87°... I was like wait, did I forget sthg..
hahaha SAME
bruh i paused at this moment of the video and was starting to freak out I had forgotten trigonometry lmao
use cemal for user name bro :D
Very helpful in breaking down the method. I went and watched the Solids: Lesson 2 traffic light video to better understand the portion during Joint B where he's naming the component vectors (4/5BD; 3/5BD vs. BDcos(53.13); BDsin(53.13). Great for architects studying for their PDD Exam! Thank you!
I checked the other video you mentioned and didn't see him explain this, would you be able to tell me the time where this happens? Thanks!
you are a god for making these videos. unfortunately i still failed my exams tho
i never knew swag and engineering can be in one dude hahaha anyways thanks a lot sir jeff youre the coolest
kaau
@@VMARIII hahaha hows engineering comrade?
@@jhydpumar3244 nahhh mas maau ang f2f kaysa online kay ang maestro tapulan d mo tudlo.
@@VMARIII kaayo, wala may ayo uban maestro ron uy
His videos are more helpful than what my teachers can ever give me
Incredible video, hats off to you Mr. Hanson what a well explained step by step example. Please keep making more videos!
you just may be the best MAE professor I have ever come across.
this did help 😁thank you
these tiny notes between the calculations are gold for understanding
Thanks men your lessons on truss did miracles for me in my exams 🙏🏾👍🏾
I'm reviewing for the FE exam. This was very helpful! Thank you very much!
This video makes this concept so easy to understand, thank you!
Bro I'm in a high school engineering program and I have my final coming up and trusses have been a struggle for me so thanks for this video!!
D.r jeff Hanson is a God.....love from internationally
Wish I had this last year, but still great to reference. Thanks!
The method of joints is strongly analogous to node-voltage analysis in electronics;
you can sort of think of the forces as "currents", and the joints as "nodes".
I was so stuck on the idea of compression and tension, thank you so much for clarifying that!
I feel like some dad "joint" joke opportunities were missed in this video
Much more enjoyable than my prof who went through the exact same problem, clearer and didn't take an entire hour out of my day.
Great content, very helpful.
The videos are very good.I was out of these problems since 1986 when I was in the university.I refreshed very well. Thank you
wow you have made my life easier Sir, thank you so much
God bless you sir, I don't even know what to say, this clarified a lot for me.
Thank you very much sir. You are highly appreciated
Im so glad i’ve found ur channel
Huge respect for you sir from uzbekistan. keep creating such amazing videos
this video is just absoluetely legendary thanks so much for your help
fantastic presentation . bravo !!!!!
Just wanted to say thanks for an easy explanation in this video
you have a fresh mind JEFF
So happy that you got a sponsor!🙌🙌🙌
Who else has statics exams this morning ??
thank you so much i have a quiz in an hour and this was perfect
that's a nice session 💯only the part of arctan 4/3which made the calculation confusing
oh my god thank you for helping me out , I have a mechanics final on Monday 🥺
absolute legend. thank you for the crazy amount of help.
Dr Hanson I'm having trouble finding out how you arrived at 53.13°.
I tried using the cosine rule but just not getting it.
Absolutely amazing
DR. Hanson ,thank you for a detail explanation of Trusses and the Method of Joints. Trusses and Joints also relies on past chapters for a solid solution.
Dr. Hanson, isn't the angle of (ABD) 53.13 degree tan^-1(4/3) ?
Oh never mind! =)
i agree
Agree
THIS WAS THE PERFECT VIDEO INTIL THE 14TH MINUTE. TOO MANY SHORTCUTS FOR MY LEVEL
Clear and straight to the point thank you!
Thank you so much from Cambodia❤️
awwwh I'm so happy Jeff got a sponsor
My professor's teaching style wasn't working for me but you made everything clear!
you just saved a life sir thank you, your video is indeed helpful .
Great Lesson!
could you do a video on complex trusses.. when you have more than two unkowns at every joint (like 3 members at each joint)
JEFF, JEEEFFFF, JEEEEEEEEEEEFFFFFFFFFF, HANSON!!!!!! Thank you boss 🙏
Fantastic video! Thank you!
In a world of piss poor professors this man has so far carried me to my senior year in CET, thanks Professor 🙏
Jeff, I miss your old videos. You've simplified all your calculations so everything simplifies/cancels out. You actually used to do some tricky problems, but I get it. You had to remake all of these videos for McGraw Hill and I don't blame you for making your job easier. You're only second best to your original videos.
What do you mean he redid his videos?
Confused on how the 5KN force was negative, but it was in the positive x-axis
You are an absolute legend!!!!
Excellent 💖💖💖
Hope you describe graphic statics and all about funicular polygons
May I ask sir why is it 11 N instead of -11 N? Cause if you sum up both negative sign it always ended with negative sign .?
Woah i was struggling to grasp this and u made it so easy
Your videos are perfect
Another great one.
Thanks. This helped me so much in my Theory of structures unit.
Thank u sir 🤩u helped me more than my original static teacher🤦♀️
Wonderful Statics lessons!! really taking the time to explain the problems along with a good sense of humor :))
I would pay double tuition to have this guy as my professor for all of my engineering courses...
Generally thank you
You saved my life
There is a mistake at the end when we are looking at joint C. Please help
In the Y direction we have Fy = 0 = 11 (reaction force) - CDxSin45 = 11 - 0,7CD
Therefore CD = 15.56
However Sin 45 = Cos 45 = 0.7
So in X direction we have Fx = 10 (BC) - CDxCos45 = 10 - 0,7 CD
Which means CD = 14.28
There must be a mistake somewhere because if the angle is 45, which it is, BC and the 11kN reaction force must be equal.
Can someone help me figure it out.
Thank you sir!
Thanks for the great efforts
Hey, at 11:13 where you mentioned that I can use tan to get the angle, why did we use 36.87 instead of 53.13? Arctan(4/3) is 53.13.
I got stuck there too and he later corrected it to 53.13°
And why must it be tan?
Sin and cos will also give the same 53.13°
Yeah, he corrected it later on. He used tan as it's opp/adj
love these videos so much. Thank you
clear. I appreciate you a whole lot
It was helpful. Thanks
Great Video!!!
Your teaching better than my own teacher, for free. Thank you
Thank you so much!!! 🙏
yes it helped defenitely
Really helpful, thanks!
really helpful, thanks
I love this guy mann