I really liked this film as well. Tar, May December and this are all incredible films that have been released within the last few years. But I have a more unconventional interpretation and reading of this film than most. the implication on the surface is that Emily receiving the promotion was just and the natural outcome of a performance-based workplace meritocracy, and Luke just acted out in a fit of misogynistic rage. what's funny though is that, if you granularly inspect the plot and dialogue, it's actually not obvious that Emily's promotion is entirely performance based. both of them appear to be equally competent at their jobs based on the events that actually happen in the movie (which of course they are; theyre just literal gamblers on the stock market with a 50% chance of winning or losing insofar as they arent basically trading on inside information), and there are strong implications that Emily was given the promotion for the psychosexual gratification of her boss. the only substantive difference seems to be that Luke is less risk-averse than Emily. so as opposed to being a purely girlboss movie, it simultaneously acknowledges workplace misogyny and the fact that females are very often not graded on a performance basis and are not interchangeable with men. I think it's almost anti-feminist in the way it affirms this recurring anthropological dynamic between the sexes
I'm so happy your back!!! 😃I hadn't seen you post anything since the Mario review 🙁
so glad to see u back on there truly the best asmr/overall channel i had these couple months
Let’s goooo! So glad your back 100% the best asmrtist
We are so back
Def putting this on my watch list. These sort of character studies tend to be my bread and butter. Good stuff 👀
omg I’ve been wondering since last summer when you’d come back we missed you 😭
HES BACK !!!!
YESSIR!!! Thank you for being so patient
I prefer no one else for my movie reviews. Glad your back man !!!
I really liked this film as well. Tar, May December and this are all incredible films that have been released within the last few years. But I have a more unconventional interpretation and reading of this film than most.
the implication on the surface is that Emily receiving the promotion was just and the natural outcome of a performance-based workplace meritocracy, and Luke just acted out in a fit of misogynistic rage.
what's funny though is that, if you granularly inspect the plot and dialogue, it's actually not obvious that Emily's promotion is entirely performance based. both of them appear to be equally competent at their jobs based on the events that actually happen in the movie (which of course they are; theyre just literal gamblers on the stock market with a 50% chance of winning or losing insofar as they arent basically trading on inside information), and there are strong implications that Emily was given the promotion for the psychosexual gratification of her boss. the only substantive difference seems to be that Luke is less risk-averse than Emily.
so as opposed to being a purely girlboss movie, it simultaneously acknowledges workplace misogyny and the fact that females are very often not graded on a performance basis and are not interchangeable with men. I think it's almost anti-feminist in the way it affirms this recurring anthropological dynamic between the sexes
It's so good to be back
Glad you're back
WE’RE BACK
The saviour is here 🥹🥹
WELCOME BACKKK
RETURN OF THE KING
The G.O.A.T IS BACK
Hooray! You’re back!!!!
The return of the century. Not sure if this is reality.
Finally backkkk ❤
Yoooo
THIS IS NOT A DRILL