In Windows version, cars have different sounds. And in some DOS versions too. Also, Windows version contains music during the race, and menu looks little different.
I played it back in the day on DOS and 3DO. DOS version ran a lot faster and the graphics were cleaner, but the 3DO version had superior sound quality and it felt a little less arcade style and more like a simulator, which I preferred.
As there was only a select few great games for the 3DO back then , of coarse i bought it! Played the hell out it. Behind the drivers seat was a new experience for me. The crashes were hilarious because they defied physics especially on high speed wrecks. Another thing that impressed me, was actually going through the cities and country side. The older games, you were pretty much only going to see the city or mountains as a static background on the horizon never to get there. The 3DO was definitely ahead of it’s time that piss poor management killed …….again,again, and again! Makes sense that is was botched by a EA x-boss. Good to see the tradition continues today…. I’ll only have rose colored lenses for the 3DO version
I played need for speed 2 on the playstation back in 99, I do remember having this game, it came in a big box on ps1, they always had it for sale at toys r us.
Wondering if emulators were used for the capture. I know 3DO version of NFS is slower (but also the first, NFS came from 3DO) but I noticed 4DO emulator will perform like 30% slower if CPU is at 12.5mhz. You have to overclock at 15-18mhz to be closer to the original. So, depending on the emulator used, it might seem a bit slower than in real hardware. I was running code that was benchmarking the real machine CPU. Phoenix emulator is ok.
The 3do was not slower at all. It was actually faster. The 3do had dual 25mhz GPUs running in tandem. It's 12.5 MHz was for background process and loading games and sound processes.
@@chelious1973 GPU was good, but you needed CPU for some of the processing in a 3D engine, like visibility, polygon sorting or preparing quads for the CEL.
Sega Saturn has a very particular atmosphere. .. Psx very good and solid, but i don't know what i miss there 3DO version also have that atmosphere of Saturn version, but i like Saturn more... MsDos version, seems being slightly better than Windows version...
The Saturn port was a triumph in coding. Not only does it look better than nearly everything else on the console, it gives the PS version a run for its money. Too bad the Japanese Nissan edition is the only version to support analog controls.
Fun fact, it took pirates 2 decades after the launch of the Saturn to get past its anti piracy systems. Sega did something right with the Saturn. Hell, Saturn even has two WipEout games (the first two WipEout games were ported to Saturn for some reason, despite WipEout being purpose made as a European launch title for the PlayStation. WipEout 3 was the first WipEout exclusively available on PS)
I like original 3do version) PC ver like NFS 2, not had soul) And i meet opinion from sim racers forum about the 3do ver. most real on physics of car. But NFS SE (1997), with ipx tech - it's cool! p.s.: sorry ma bad eng, i'm from Russia)
@@wieldylattice3015 3DO version is more of a simulation, the others are arcade. It runs just fine on my 3DO, and having a 240p FZ1 actually makes it run better with a higher FPS. For racing games, 24fps -30 is fine.
The PC version is undoubtedly the best version. Has smooth frame rate and graphics aren’t subject to pixelation. Of the consoles though, the winner is definitely PlayStation. Runs the game a lot smoother than the 3DO and Saturn
The kind of PC hardware available in 1995 (when DOS version of NFS was new) was not powerful enough to play in hi-res (640x480 pixels) at a smooth frame-rate, so it depends on the angle from which you view the PC version of NFS; from today’s perspective or in retrospect. That said, it’s still a good version of the game, but you needed an expensive computer (back when a good PC was even more expensive, and before GPUs or 3D cards were a thing) to get it looking and running nicely when new.
@@Banzeken That's wrong. The PC just required a VLB or a PCI videocard and VESA VBE 2.0 drivers to run in 640x480 high-res resolutions at acceptable frames. At that time you could buy a 486DX4 100 Mhz or a Pentium 75 MHz.
@@OpenGL4ever You could get a Pentium 133 by September 1995 (when NSF was new) and that still would not handle NFS smoothly outside of interlaced (as opposed to progressive) 640x480 or 320x200. Really, though, what is your definition of “acceptable frames” here? I think that has to be established before any further potential misunderstandings occur. I don’t know what OP means with “smooth frame rate” but let’s assume it’s in the neighborhood of 30 frames/second, give or take. Problems occur when we use your DX4/100 example as a subject for running NFS smoothly at 640x480 when we consider the video titled *Escom 486DX4 100 MHz, tons of games & benchmarks* by Nocito87. NFS can be observed running at 320x200 at an OK frame-rate with slowdown still occuring (particularly with an external camera perspective and when driving through woods) and that’s possibly with lower detail settings. Can’t imagine how much lower performance would get above that. Plenty of 1995 already stressed out a Pentium 90 (which is a system I own), including Hi-Octane, Slipstream 5000, Mechwarrior 2, Screamer (etc.) and that’s at 320x200. I don’t believe for a second that 640x480 NFS would do any better on that same system, let alone a Pentium 75 or - God forbid - a DX4, VESA 1.2 or 2.0 or otherwise. It’s only a shame that I don’t remember how my P90 handled NFS at 640x480 and I shouldn’t be required to dig it out and plug it in just to prove a point.
@@Banzeken Yes, in 1995 you could buy faster CPUs, this makes it even easier. I was referring to 1994, because another VESA 640x480x256 game was released in that year. In the DOS days everything above 20 fps was acceptable. 60 fps and more actually only became a thing at new games when the Voodoo 2 was released. And that was a powerful 3D accelerator that a game had to be written for or a supported 3d API had to be used in order to use its features. Vanilla NFS only had a software renderer as far as i know. You need VESA 2.0 to use linear frame buffer and stay in protected mode. VESA 1.2 was designed for real mode and thus comes with a speed penalty.
I only played the PC version. It's nice and great compared to its time, but the car's control is a bit hard in the narrow curves on a higher speed. For me it seems like the other version's control is more friendly. But the graphics are not so good in the consol versions. As far as I know, these contains only three courses in contrast, the PC version contains six! The best menu is also in the PC version. So in my opinion, the PC version is the best. DOS and Windows versions are exactly the same.
I played it on the VFX-1 at some event. The lenses were terrible, like looking into a microscope, and the framerate was below 30 But it was in full glorious 3D. I think. It was hard to see.
Do Cruis'n: Arcade Nintendo 64 Need for Speed: 3DO, MS-DOS, Windows, PlayStation, Saturn Twisted Metal: PlayStation Microsoft Windows Carmageddon: MS-DOS, Windows, Mac OS, iOS, Android Crazy Taxi: Arcade Dreamcast PlayStation 2 GameCube Windows PlayStation 3 Xbox 360 iOS Android
Playstation all the way. Dunno why the Viper was changed from the accurate V10 sound to something generic. Sounds absolutely horrible with all the cars in the PC version having this lol
ps1 usa dithering para los colores y posiblemente resolución entrelazada , siempre usa esos trucos que le funcionan bastante bien, ya que en consolas es la de mejor framerate
The 3DO original was almost a completely different game than its ports. It was much more of a driving simulator than a racing game as the traffic is much more inconsiderate of your existence. The Playstation port is the worst looking, worst controlling, and the fastest. The Saturn port is noticeably slower than the Playstation version but plays noticeably better and also looks much better. The SE version on the PC is the best as it does run at 60 frames in DOSBOX with the best graphics by far and also has the most additional content. For me the top are the PC and Saturn versions.
@@sebastiankulche They are really not the same. And the PC version handles fine for its time. Obviously it doesn't hold a candle for any decent racing game, that came out even just a few years later.
@@sebastiankulche Stunts was one of my favourite game, but for you to even compare it to NFS on PC is laughable. They are not even in the same universe handling wise.
Man, the 3DO's CPU really works against it here in a very noticeable manner. It's CPU only had 12.5MHz as opposed to the Playstation's 33.8 and the Saturn's 2X 28.6 When they weren't moving you could argue whether the 3DO or Saturn were better, but as soon as they started moving it became crystal clear that Saturn's version was vastly superior. Another interesting thing to note is how it seems (to me at least) that the Playstation's version is the best despite not quite having as high fidelity or frame rate as the MS-DOS and Windows versions. The speed is still really fast and the movements and music get me more pumped than the somewhat slower and toned down PC versions.
3do grafico interpolado e rodando a 15fps ainda que tenha uma boa trilha sonora e ecutscenes muito memoraveis, saturn não tem transparencia e parece rodar a uma resolução mais baixa, PS1 roda a 30fps constante mas é granulado e tem poligonos piscando, a versão de MSDOS roda a 256 cores apesar de ter um fps constante mas não tem trilha sonora, a versão de windows tem fps constante mas não tem trilha sonora, mas parece ter uma paleta de cores mais suave. Se não fosse a jogabilidade afetada pelo baixo frame rate a versão de 3do seria a melhor por fatores como trilha sonora, cutscenes e atmosfera.
The Special Edition on PC is the strongest as it essentially includes everything the others have plus two additional tracks! However, the PS1 version is great as well as it has features unavailable on other ports including: - Morning AND Evening on all tracks (besides Lost Vegas) - Arcade Mode - Machine Gun Cheat - very fun on the segmented tracks - Lunar Springs - AI cars are of different colours
Windows is the best one, Saturn best captures the 3D) original's vision while improving on certain aspects. DOS is more vivid, but the distant pop-in is a bit distracting. PlayStation is trying too hard to be different; different sky box, overly sharp visuals which aren't bad, but are trying too hard to make an unnecessary change. though it wins over the 3DO for the smoother and higher framerate. 1. Windows. 2. Saturn/DOS. 3. Playstation 4. 3DO 5. I imagine a JAVA version would go here if there was one.
One drawback to the PlayStation version is how, as much as I like the pixelated look, it makes it really hard to see distant objects. an Issue with many PlayStation, and some Saturn games compared to PC counterparts, like Tomb Raider, Need for Speed, Metal Gear Solid, etc.
I Like The PC Version, Which one is your favorite?
All of them, of course. 😉
Sega Saturn
PC & 3DO
In Windows version, cars have different sounds. And in some DOS versions too. Also, Windows version contains music during the race, and menu looks little different.
Me recomiendas un juego de ds?
honestly I think the original 3DO version looks the best for some reason
Could be that it looks unique compared to later versions.
I played it back in the day on DOS and 3DO. DOS version ran a lot faster and the graphics were cleaner, but the 3DO version had superior sound quality and it felt a little less arcade style and more like a simulator, which I preferred.
I had it on 3do and Saturn and the 3do version was by fat better
Well it depends on your hardware if you try and run it on a 386 your gonna have a bad time
4:3 please. No widescreen
Yeah, chanel calling itself pro, but can't even get the picture in correct aspect ratio
@@alienbishopmore than that...look at the pc version, that is not the default one. Framerate and resolution is off ( antialias etc).
I loved the 3d0 version best, somehow the handling felt more "real"
you could feel the car, on the others it was cardboard boxes.
That and the AI was way more fair, at least compared to the PS1 version.
3do had the most realistic color pallet too
Pfffft. 3D0 was unrealistically slow. Fuck outta here.
As there was only a select few great games for the 3DO back then , of coarse i bought it! Played the hell out it. Behind the drivers seat was a new experience for me. The crashes were hilarious because they defied physics especially on high speed wrecks. Another thing that impressed me, was actually going through the cities and country side. The older games, you were pretty much only going to see the city or mountains as a static background on the horizon never to get there. The 3DO was definitely ahead of it’s time that piss poor management killed …….again,again, and again! Makes sense that is was botched by a EA x-boss. Good to see the tradition continues today….
I’ll only have rose colored lenses for the 3DO version
The 3DO version was a simulator, was different, better quality.. o/
PlayStation was the superior copy of the game if not simply for sound alone as PS1’s had the best sound chip of all the platforms at the time.
3DO version only!
Seeing this on the 3do back when I was 12 was the greatest thing in the world!?
3do version without any doubt masterpiece
Me and my friends used to play split screen on the PS1 all the time. It was our go to vs game, since it was easier to pick up than fighting games.
I have the 3do copy. I truly love the first NFS
I played need for speed 2 on the playstation back in 99, I do remember having this game, it came in a big box on ps1, they always had it for sale at toys r us.
Judging by 3DO original the whole series entirely were designed as driving simulator, not racing.
First need for speed, was an excellent spiritual sequel of Test Drive 2 in my opinion... from Need for Speed 2 start to go on arcade...
That's why they collaborated with Road & Track magazine and used all of their test data and feedbacks, it's a sim for sure.
I would say the 3do version still feels very arcade though. Just a bit more "natural" compared to the other ports.
The pc version was one of the earlier games that supported force feedback
Are you sure it supports force feedback wheels? This is the first time I hear about this.
Wondering if emulators were used for the capture.
I know 3DO version of NFS is slower (but also the first, NFS came from 3DO) but I noticed 4DO emulator will perform like 30% slower if CPU is at 12.5mhz. You have to overclock at 15-18mhz to be closer to the original. So, depending on the emulator used, it might seem a bit slower than in real hardware. I was running code that was benchmarking the real machine CPU. Phoenix emulator is ok.
There needs to be a Mister core for the 3DO. If the Mister can do Saturn and PS1 it should be able to do the 3DO.
Plus the 3DO version was released in 1994 a year before the ps1 version.
The 3do was not slower at all. It was actually faster. The 3do had dual 25mhz GPUs running in tandem. It's 12.5 MHz was for background process and loading games and sound processes.
@@chelious1973 GPU was good, but you needed CPU for some of the processing in a 3D engine, like visibility, polygon sorting or preparing quads for the CEL.
Sega Saturn has a very particular atmosphere. .. Psx very good and solid, but i don't know what i miss there 3DO version also have that atmosphere of Saturn version, but i like Saturn more... MsDos version, seems being slightly better than Windows version...
The Saturn port was a triumph in coding. Not only does it look better than nearly everything else on the console, it gives the PS version a run for its money. Too bad the Japanese Nissan edition is the only version to support analog controls.
Fun fact, it took pirates 2 decades after the launch of the Saturn to get past its anti piracy systems. Sega did something right with the Saturn. Hell, Saturn even has two WipEout games (the first two WipEout games were ported to Saturn for some reason, despite WipEout being purpose made as a European launch title for the PlayStation. WipEout 3 was the first WipEout exclusively available on PS)
3DO was best, The physics and sensations of driving were much better than others.
Hey, "pro" channel, is it too hard to upload videos in correct aspect ratio? You are doing comparison video and didn't even get the picture right???
Thanks to 3do Panasonic because today we get more nfs games
More like NFG.
PlayStation definitely has the best aged menu
DOS AND 3DO VERSION
Another great comparison.
I like original 3do version)
PC ver like NFS 2, not had soul)
And i meet opinion from sim racers forum about the 3do ver. most real on physics of car.
But NFS SE (1997), with ipx tech - it's cool!
p.s.: sorry ma bad eng, i'm from Russia)
3DO version was more of a sim in physics and was the better of them all. Sega and Playstation were arcadish or childish..
3DO can barely run anything at a consistent framerate
So basically you pick your poison. 3DO version is better made, but rubs like dogshit. PS and Saturn run like a dream, but are made not so well
*runs not rubs
@@wieldylattice3015 3DO version is more of a simulation, the others are arcade. It runs just fine on my 3DO, and having a 240p FZ1 actually makes it run better with a higher FPS. For racing games, 24fps -30 is fine.
@@wieldylattice3015 Fortunately overclocking fixes it.
3DO MORE ORIGINAL!!!
The PC version is undoubtedly the best version. Has smooth frame rate and graphics aren’t subject to pixelation. Of the consoles though, the winner is definitely PlayStation. Runs the game a lot smoother than the 3DO and Saturn
The kind of PC hardware available in 1995 (when DOS version of NFS was new) was not powerful enough to play in hi-res (640x480 pixels) at a smooth frame-rate, so it depends on the angle from which you view the PC version of NFS; from today’s perspective or in retrospect. That said, it’s still a good version of the game, but you needed an expensive computer (back when a good PC was even more expensive, and before GPUs or 3D cards were a thing) to get it looking and running nicely when new.
I thought I was smoother on Saturn.
@@Banzeken That's wrong. The PC just required a VLB or a PCI videocard and VESA VBE 2.0 drivers to run in 640x480 high-res resolutions at acceptable frames. At that time you could buy a 486DX4 100 Mhz or a Pentium 75 MHz.
@@OpenGL4ever You could get a Pentium 133 by September 1995 (when NSF was new) and that still would not handle NFS smoothly outside of interlaced (as opposed to progressive) 640x480 or 320x200. Really, though, what is your definition of “acceptable frames” here? I think that has to be established before any further potential misunderstandings occur. I don’t know what OP means with “smooth frame rate” but let’s assume it’s in the neighborhood of 30 frames/second, give or take. Problems occur when we use your DX4/100 example as a subject for running NFS smoothly at 640x480 when we consider the video titled *Escom 486DX4 100 MHz, tons of games & benchmarks* by Nocito87. NFS can be observed running at 320x200 at an OK frame-rate with slowdown still occuring (particularly with an external camera perspective and when driving through woods) and that’s possibly with lower detail settings. Can’t imagine how much lower performance would get above that. Plenty of 1995 already stressed out a Pentium 90 (which is a system I own), including Hi-Octane, Slipstream 5000, Mechwarrior 2, Screamer (etc.) and that’s at 320x200. I don’t believe for a second that 640x480 NFS would do any better on that same system, let alone a Pentium 75 or - God forbid - a DX4, VESA 1.2 or 2.0 or otherwise. It’s only a shame that I don’t remember how my P90 handled NFS at 640x480 and I shouldn’t be required to dig it out and plug it in just to prove a point.
@@Banzeken Yes, in 1995 you could buy faster CPUs, this makes it even easier. I was referring to 1994, because another VESA 640x480x256 game was released in that year.
In the DOS days everything above 20 fps was acceptable.
60 fps and more actually only became a thing at new games when the Voodoo 2 was released. And that was a powerful 3D accelerator that a game had to be written for or a supported 3d API had to be used in order to use its features. Vanilla NFS only had a software renderer as far as i know.
You need VESA 2.0 to use linear frame buffer and stay in protected mode. VESA 1.2 was designed for real mode and thus comes with a speed penalty.
All versions beside 3DO feel more like arcade while 3DO is more simulator like. I played dos windows and have 3DO which i like the most.
Thank you, really interesting
That aspect ratio.... Just WHY??
MS-DOS is the best version as it supports graphics acceleration from the S3 cards S3Trio/Virge GX-GX2 etc. (not shown in this video)
this is the best part of all the parts that came out
3do all the way because it's the only version who had that annoying guy who heckled you after the race! lol
No difference between versions for DOS and for Windows.
I tested both on the same computer back in the days and the DOS version definitely ran faster and smoother.
The DOS version was easily the best
I only played the PC version. It's nice and great compared to its time, but the car's control is a bit hard in the narrow curves on a higher speed. For me it seems like the other version's control is more friendly. But the graphics are not so good in the consol versions. As far as I know, these contains only three courses in contrast, the PC version contains six! The best menu is also in the PC version. So in my opinion, the PC version is the best. DOS and Windows versions are exactly the same.
Saturn wins fps...Windows win resolution...PlayStation wins sound
On Windows and DOS if you get the Special Edition they get better car sound than the original
Best Need 4 Speed game ever ❤️
No.
@@MidnightApex-ml6jc yes
@@husamshaker9251 most wanted clears easily.
I played it on the VFX-1 at some event.
The lenses were terrible, like looking into a microscope, and the framerate was below 30
But it was in full glorious 3D. I think. It was hard to see.
Do Cruis'n: Arcade
Nintendo 64
Need for Speed:
3DO, MS-DOS, Windows, PlayStation, Saturn
Twisted Metal: PlayStation
Microsoft Windows
Carmageddon:
MS-DOS, Windows, Mac OS, iOS, Android
Crazy Taxi: Arcade
Dreamcast
PlayStation 2
GameCube
Windows
PlayStation 3
Xbox 360
iOS
Android
The 3DO port of NFS 1994 is the best along with PlayStation 1 port.
Playstation :33.8hmz
saturn:28.7hmz
3DO: 12,5 MHz
each of these versions is interesting in, its own way but the best part for me is nfs3 for ps1
Playstation all the way. Dunno why the Viper was changed from the accurate V10 sound to something generic. Sounds absolutely horrible with all the cars in the PC version having this lol
3DO is the best version. Street racing and more realism while the rest are track racing
Saturn and 3do
this game needs remastered to be♥️
на ps1 не графика ,а какая-то каша из пикселей. на всех остальных приемлемо.
Presented in SQUASH-O-VISION.
ps1 usa dithering para los colores y posiblemente resolución entrelazada , siempre usa esos trucos que le funcionan bastante bien, ya que en consolas es la de mejor framerate
No music on 3do😢
Sorry about that 😅
Why are you comparing stuff in different tracks and even different camera positions? That's a pretty bad comparison.
The "Windows" version is the same "MSDOS" version. Its the same CDROM =P
but ran smoother in DOS environment
The 3DO original was almost a completely different game than its ports. It was much more of a driving simulator than a racing game as the traffic is much more inconsiderate of your existence. The Playstation port is the worst looking, worst controlling, and the fastest. The Saturn port is noticeably slower than the Playstation version but plays noticeably better and also looks much better. The SE version on the PC is the best as it does run at 60 frames in DOSBOX with the best graphics by far and also has the most additional content. For me the top are the PC and Saturn versions.
Never played it on PC, I only have it for PS1, is the handling better on PC?
Much better, a lot less arcade like.
I feel like both are the same... Bad.
@@sebastiankulche They are really not the same. And the PC version handles fine for its time. Obviously it doesn't hold a candle for any decent racing game, that came out even just a few years later.
@@kosztaz87 Top Gear, F-zero and Stunts were released in 1990 and controls miles better.
@@sebastiankulche Stunts was one of my favourite game, but for you to even compare it to NFS on PC is laughable. They are not even in the same universe handling wise.
Man, the 3DO's CPU really works against it here in a very noticeable manner. It's CPU only had 12.5MHz as opposed to the Playstation's 33.8 and the Saturn's 2X 28.6
When they weren't moving you could argue whether the 3DO or Saturn were better, but as soon as they started moving it became crystal clear that Saturn's version was vastly superior.
Another interesting thing to note is how it seems (to me at least) that the Playstation's version is the best despite not quite having as high fidelity or frame rate as the MS-DOS and Windows versions. The speed is still really fast and the movements and music get me more pumped than the somewhat slower and toned down PC versions.
Except when you actually play them the 3DO version feels so much better.
@@dreamportstudios1057 Ahhh, of course it did love😉
Saturn wins by a very very slim margin with PlayStation second
3do grafico interpolado e rodando a 15fps ainda que tenha uma boa trilha sonora e ecutscenes muito memoraveis, saturn não tem transparencia e parece rodar a uma resolução mais baixa, PS1 roda a 30fps constante mas é granulado e tem poligonos piscando, a versão de MSDOS roda a 256 cores apesar de ter um fps constante mas não tem trilha sonora, a versão de windows tem fps constante mas não tem trilha sonora, mas parece ter uma paleta de cores mais suave. Se não fosse a jogabilidade afetada pelo baixo frame rate a versão de 3do seria a melhor por fatores como trilha sonora, cutscenes e atmosfera.
SEGA SATURN AND PS1 VERSION
1st: 3DO
2nd: Saturn
3: Windows & MS-DOS
Loser: PS1
The Special Edition on PC is the strongest as it essentially includes everything the others have plus two additional tracks!
However, the PS1 version is great as well as it has features unavailable on other ports including:
- Morning AND Evening on all tracks (besides Lost Vegas)
- Arcade Mode
- Machine Gun Cheat - very fun on the segmented tracks
- Lunar Springs
- AI cars are of different colours
Using emulators is such a waste of time,the ps1 does not look like that
3do sem duvida. o primeiro e o melhor. um verdadeiro simulador. logico que tem limitações de hardware mas é o melhor.
Plz do nfs 1997 comparison
I like the playstation version.
Ms dos and windows are by far the most graphically superior. I would say of the consoles Saturn wins.
3DO looks terrible
773
3do ver is best
3do good graphic
Playstation mais eficiente rodando a 60 cravado, Saturn/dos/ windows perto disso. 3d0 30fps
MSdos가 모든 면에서 제일 뛰어남
3 DO
nice
3DO best
😍😍👌
No contest - 3DO ruled every single version.
saturn
dos is winner
I prefer to play this on PlayStation and PC
Why would you even bother to compare PC to console in that era? PC always > than any console back then. No contest ever.
The point was to showcase what the game looked like on the different platforms it was available on. Also yeah, PC gaming was leagues ahead back then
Windows is the best one, Saturn best captures the 3D) original's vision while improving on certain aspects.
DOS is more vivid, but the distant pop-in is a bit distracting.
PlayStation is trying too hard to be different; different sky box, overly sharp visuals which aren't bad, but are trying too hard to make an unnecessary change. though it wins over the 3DO for the smoother and higher framerate.
1. Windows.
2. Saturn/DOS.
3. Playstation
4. 3DO
5. I imagine a JAVA version would go here if there was one.
One drawback to the PlayStation version is how, as much as I like the pixelated look, it makes it really hard to see distant objects. an Issue with many PlayStation, and some Saturn games compared to PC counterparts, like Tomb Raider, Need for Speed, Metal Gear Solid, etc.
pc win
Trick question? They all look like crap; nonetheless, I’ve played all versions except for the PC port.
Mate this game is older than Dasani and Pokémon I think it deserves a tad of slack
First coment
Im first
First 🏁
I 1