I was a geology major and the Lord had different plans. I now only see the evidence for creation even with my naturalistic knowledge. It’s crazy. But it’s GOD!
Well the issue is that everyone uses the same word to describe different aspects of the word. So naturally people will get confused and agitated over it. There is purpose and intent in our world that is evident on every scale but humans claiming that they understand it or in some how know what its intent is.... Just the height of ignorance and blasphemy. As far as creation theory that is very simple as we are currently powerful and knowledgeable enough to create life as well both silicon and carbon. And even that we are too the result of the intent of the universe mere 60 years ago AI was nothing more than a crazy sci-fi idea yet today you can converse seek advice be driven by assisted at work and so many more real life implications where AI is functioning for years. So if we can bring from a dream to reality in 60 years. Why do you think that cells can't diversify to such extent in a few million years also a cell life time is not equal human life time either not sure where is the surprising part... And about god not being acknowledged enough. Isn't religion the issue not god? lol
Lol, what the fuck? Let's review what's happened. After being thoroughly ridiculed and accurately dismissed as wackos and simpletons, the Christians did what every committed political group will do, which, mind you, is not to give up, but to double down and go philosophical or literal, whatever it takes, in order to save face and eke out a dignified existence. In this video, we have a case of them battling the bane of their existence: the indictment against the god of the gaps. How do Christians respond? Easy. (1) Insist the gaps are real, and (2) upon realizing that this insistence is both futile and irrelevant, insist that gaps have no bearing on their god one way or another, and (3) insert their god into an untouchable philosophical gap of all gaps. So my dear "engineer", how exactly were you swayed by the stuff of step (1)????? Was it the graphics? The citing of scientific findings? The Christians have provided nothing but age-old rebuttals against age-old indictments. Nothing's changed. You just didn't know that christians have always had a department of philosophy, which the christians are now leaning into as defense to justify their existence.
I had a cancerous brain tumor literally melt inside my head before the brain surgery, which then took 4x as long as they planned because they simply did not know what they were even looking at. The MRI showed very clearly a solid white tumor, however, when they cut me open they found something competely different from what they had planned for. I received pre surgery counseling with the doctors and my parents, discussing my upcoming radiation schedule and also the possibility of partial paralyzation or other neurological impairments. They even counseled us for the chance that I would not make it out. Lots of things happened to encourage me during the whole process, like what seemd to be an angel in the cafeteria giving me Bible verses on little ripped pieces of paper(it was 1 Corinthians 6:19-20, that blew my mind) However, when they opened my head (with what looked like a pizza cutter with a saw blade on it) they found only an entagled lump of soft tissue. My neurologist at the time, Dr. Edward Zampella (I'll never forget him), the most renowned and successful in NJ for my kind of surgery, suggested that it was possible our prayer and annointing with oil was the catalyst. He also encouraged the prayer pre surgery, stating that the evidence suggests it is helpful. I left the hospital (Summit Overlook) 3 days later without a drop of radiation but 27 staples in my head, and I think my Dad is still paying the bill! I have told my story ever since. Thank you, Jesus The fact that people would bash my real life story is just sad. I already have to suffer the rest of my life with headaches and a partially synthetic skull, never mind a bunch of other stuff. I've also, with God's help, overcome homelessness, drug addiction, criminal lifestyle, and child abuse as well as a 5day coma from a botched hernia operation. To now be married to an amazing godly woman and own a home. The devil tried extra hard to take me out and FAILED! It's all because God is good. Grace is abounding, and he works all things for good for those who love the Lord!
To the trolls out there, many of which are my friends irl, how depraved and angry at God can you get? It's getting you nowhere. Stop and reflect. Live your life bigger than the world, love and lift up each other, encourage good behavior and positive messages. Stop letting ideologies divide us. Instead, they should bring us together (if they prove good). Stop giving the system what it wants in having us war amongst ourselves and lift each other up. Some people who may have called themselves Christians maybe once made you feel like they were saying its Gods way or the highway. It's not like that. He wants to meet us all where we are, and those people were probably just a little confused and bugged out a bit, probably out of concern and love. Some have used the truth to promote evil, but that should come as no surprise to you, and you should still be able to discern that, regardless of belief. The prophets and teachers of this age have been misled. You may be misunderstanding vast aspects of the Bible. I've studied pretty hard for many years and am still learning, you cant just take other peoples words and understand everything in this life. But you can also just come plain and simple with no research if your heart allows you. And for you demons, just live with the mistakes you've made. And leave others alone. Your mission is futile in its current form. You are getting double and triple scammed and it's truly pathetic
You omitted a wonderful thing in itself. The route they follow doesn't exist until they need it. The roadway is constructed and once it's not needed anymore, it's taken apart and stored until they need another one built. It's building blocks and recycled. This keeps the interior clear and lessens the amount of "construction material" needed. The ultimate use of space and materials. It's like if you need to go to the store, the road doesn't exist until you need it and once you get to the store it is deconstructed and stored until you need a road to go somewhere else.
It was apparent that there were many more details that some had to be cut in order to limit the length of the video. People have studied cells for years and continue to learn more.
Yes. To think that this wasn't designed, or came about by mutation and natural selection is just sheer dishonesty or cognitive dissonance in the extreme. I am astonished when I see the type of people who defend evolution.
I'm not surprised that evolutionists have avoided responding. Design is evident in all life forms. You would have to put your mind in a black box to ignore the facts. Looks like Cal was successful. There are so many molecular machines in living cells that even Richard Dawkins is confused. "We are fearfully and wonderfully made".
This is a video that shows that religious beliefs and science are NOT meant to be totally different sides of a coin. It's all in one! The more I learn about scientific studies the more my belief/faith/trust in this great creation grows. ❤❤❤
We sure are and let that person laugh all day. Want it just helps prove prophecy more and more. The scoffers will realize when they're on their knees. Bowing wagging their tongue, declaring the Lord Jesus Christ and very soon, too.
Amen! In John 14:6 Jesus says, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” The truth never changes! There will be no atheists in hell, only foolish people who will know for all eternity that they chose to reject Jesus’ free gift of salvation. There is nothing funny about an eternity without Jesus.
fearfully? is that why you believe, because you're afraid of your sky daddy? do you need that fear to have morals and be a good person? if so , you sure are not a good person !
@@cliftongaither6642 You obviously don't know the Bible. If you knew the scriptures, you don't understand what fearfully and wonderfully made meant. It means respect in a beautiful way. It doesn't mean fear meaning to be afraid of means to be in awe of to respect.
But he lived a very long time before even a slight grasp of genetics! I don't understand why people take quotations from a Bible written a very long time ago, that only proves what people knew then! Historically fascinating. Proof of the non-existence of evolution - not helpful at all.
@@catherinetownshend6613 I find it quite odd that people think they are smarter today, then those of the past. They have technology from the past that we have no idea how to recreate. But the craziest thing is that people want to think that all this came from nothing.
This is really fascinating stuff. The first college I went to for my associate's degree was no Christian college. But I remember being in biology class and reading about cells, DNA, RNA, proteins, etc., I was astonished at how complex our bodies are. I never once thought to myself, "Yeah, these processes could have formed by themselves." Absolutely not, this looks like intricate and intelligent design to me. What it looks like to someone else, I can't say, but as a person who is very creative, I see divine creativity.
That's all very well, but "looks like to me" is not a valid scientific argument. I don't care what people choose to believe, as long as they don't claim that science supports something when it does not
@@jockyoung4491You don't need science for everything. For example, look at a picture of a chimp. Then look at yourself in the mirror. I don't need "science" to lie to me and say we are 98% genetically built the same.
@@nathanielalderson9111 I think not. I have never seen anybody present data that could refute evolution, despite endlessly trying. Likewise there is no single piece of data that can prove evolution. Biological evolution is so widely accepted because it is the only theory that can fit ALL of the available evidence taken together. And it is both observable and testable.
Excellent video! After reading some of the scoffers comments who clearly never even watched this, Sometimes it seems it would be better if comments were just turned off.
In my own life, I not only saw His wonders in nature, but also in answer to my prayers. I experienced God in so many ways and no one can argue that 50 years with God is my imagination. It is the most fullfilling life anyone can live!!❤
@@MrRandomRamblings Jesus Christ, the King of kings. My imagination is not that good. Try a relationship with Him and you will experience it for yourself. You do not have to believe me. Blessings dear friend.
Kinesin is only one molecular machine. There are others that turn oxygen and other materials into ATP, mentioned in this video. Others spin like motors that make flangellae flail around. Other replicate strands of DNA for cellular division. Those microtubules that kinesin walk on are another marvel in and of itself!
@@globalcoupledanceskinesin allows transport of molecule or protein in cells, kinases are enzymes that allow the addition of phosphate groups to molecules
This video is completely ridiculous. One of the worst arguments I've ever heard... seriously! And fortunately only a minority of Christians believe this creationist crap.
it's interesting that these proteins don't move by themselves but have a bias towards moving in a certain direction and they do this when they are bumped by molecules of water. That's why hydration is important in general
Those animations were intentionally created (by actual scientists) to be super-simplified. What's missing for clarity is a total jam-packed stew of proteins and enzymes and other molecules that either randomly bash about or directly interact with those relatively simple molecular machines. What's shown are far from programmed robots. Ignore the narrator, he's afraid of something he refuses to believe but more likely he suffers from a ridiculous evangelical confirmation bias.
Let me ask adult theists the following: If god is an intelligent creator of the universe then he must have designed you to crap out dirty filthy stinking turds, to have stinking farts, and sometime have stinking wet farts in public. Now after you have a crap have a good look down the toilet at your excrement and think to yourself the intelligent designer designed you to do that. Now evolution doesn't have such a problem, it is simply a product of nature not a designer. Further if Jesus had healing powers why didn't the people find out where he crapped, collect his turds and use them to cure people? Holy crap they would have coined it in. Did Jesus ever say : I have a parable to tell you but I must go for a crap first? Did he fart in front of his disciples?Jesus supposedly fed the five thousand,where did the five thousand crap and pee? Did it not occur to Jesus to miraculously create toilet blocks with flush toilets, hand wash basins, electric hot air hand driers, showers, towels, soft toilet paper etc. No, You want a fairy tale Jesus who didn't crap, fart, have wet farts or go for a pee. You are all deluded!
AiG's TH-cam has a treasure-trove of videos like this. If you want even more AiG TV has even more still and has a very inexpensive subscription price and if you choose the yearly subscription it's lower even still. Last I subscribed it was if I'm not mistaken I believe $39 for a whole year.
you should learn more and read more science not stupid religion creation stuff, that is Harry Potter style and so outdatet, god is not real and magic is not real, science is real and our knowledge is growing, the paradigma is updating every day, not religion, that was human first and worst attempt to understand reality. Science is our best tool!
@@frankytheman6665 evolutionists, so determined to deny God despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It's not a "You believe in Harry Potter style outdated nonsense" it's a heart issue on your part. You believe you know better. Sadly you don't and one day you'll figure it out. I only pray you do before it's too late.
@@DarrenCorleybuddy research Svante Paabo awarded The Nobel Peace Prize 2022 for DNA extraction from Neanderthal bones, that's NEANDERTHAL human species not us Sapiens human species. Fact check me please
Very interesting video. My only recommendation is to turn down the background music. I suggested my wife watch it and she found it overwhelmingly loud and difficult to hear the narration. Keep up the great content.
Absolutely love your content - it's sophisticated, honest, powerful and beautifully presented. Superb information for those times when we have opportunity to speak to friends, colleagues, family, neighbours etc. about our origins and design. Thank you so much.
I remember in my undergrad pre-meds so many of my atheist classmates were so snarky towards Answers in Genesis and other scientist who believe in creation. Later I noticed in med school not as many of them are left or at least they are less vocal and confident in their humanist world view. It does start to get ridiculous after a while listening to them try and 😅😊contribute all the complexity of life to chance and time. There is no such thing as simple life. The most “primitive” life we know of is mind blowingly complex. As we learn more and more about how cells work, we keep uncovering more and more levels of complexity, and we learn more and more about how much we don’t understand. In these cool little computer graphics that we find so impressive, it shows amino acids and other cellular “raw material” just floating around. Well, nothing in the cell just floats around. Everything is controlled and transported intentionally . Our computer graphic designers are simply not talented enough to display the full detail of what we know so far of how a cell works. And we are just scratching the surface of understanding cellular biology. There is FAR more we don’t know than what we do. Gods signature is all over creation. In my eyes, I can see how perfect Gods creation is in its design, but also that life is decaying, not improving. Our genetic code is breaking down. All of life’s genetic codes are rapidly being corrupted. Sin did this. Of course I can only see the truth because I know the Lord who created me and everything in creation. God has even blessed me with and experience where I was able to glimpse behind the veil but only for a moment. From that time forward it is apparent to me that death isn’t natural. It was never part of Gods design. Evolutionist always talk about the “endless natural cycle of life and death” well, NO! God is Life! He gives us everlasting Life! Sin is death.
Wow! What incredible insight and what a beautiful and encouraging message at the end. Clearly you are well studied and gifted in your field. The more I look at life and our environment the more fascinated and in awe of GOD I become and the more zi despise satan for his lies, deceit and corruption in the world. I am looking forward to the Day Jesus smashes satan and his minions and condemns them to ever enduring fire. God be PRAISED🙏🏆🏆
@@jockyoung4491you are correct on a micro evolution level. Eg, Darwin’s finches developing different beaks on different islands with different habitats and food types over hundreds of years but evolution on a macro level as in monkeys becoming human there is absolutely no evidence neither archeologically or by fossils not to mention chromosomes. If you look at the state of humanity today in general in fact I believe we are DEvolving. Sun is the great corruptor and the more we commit it the worse it will become. Repentance is the only way.
@@jockyoung4491 That is a lie. Darwin himself suggested it with his idea of pangenes. For him, evolution had to be completely random using natural selection (survival of the fittest). He also believed that the fossil record was a challenge to his theory of Evolution (because of all the gaps in the fossil record), go figure! So you think the main founder of the theory of Evolution is silly? You are full of contradictions. The original definition of Evolution included randomness and that was held almost right through the 19th and 20th centuries.
My question then becomes, how did God create these complex structures? Did he design each nitty gritty aspect at a time? Did he sit down at a computer and write the code that drives them? Did he get it right on the first try or was it iterative? Was he working alone or with a team? My point is that this raises way more questions than it answers, and saying Goddidit is not a useful explanation.
God does not operate within the natural boundaries of our universe. He does not even operate within the confines of time. He created time and he designed every scientific law that sustains his creation. So no, he did not sit down and write up endless blueprints of the universe before finally coming up with a good design. He is not a physical being. Our minds can only understand so much. Fully understanding the nature and being of God is not something we are capable of, given that we are natural beings and he is "supernatural". Does that make sense? Please keep asking questions though
@@forrest7050 Everything you need to know about who God is can be found in the Bible. His own book. I'm not gonna have another endless online debate about the validity of the Bible since that is undoubtedly what your next question will address but give the book of Luke a read and you can see exactly what God is like because he actually came to earth as a human for 33 years and Luke has kindly gathered the testimony of several eye-witnesses and written it down for you.
@@forrest7050 This is my answer for other guy. He asked me z same kind of question. So, u'll find z answer within The topic at hand is the identification of a supernatural being responsible for creation. Through the act of questioning and reasoning, one endeavors to determine if there exists an entity who intentionally orchestrates events rather than things occurred by chance. Furthermore, the aspect of culture and gods serves as a compelling reason to consider the existence of a supernatural being. Why do people all over the world across generation believe in supernatural being? Do you think all people are dumb and didn't know anything? You may wonder, who is the true God? Why are there so many gods? For discussion let us take the Bible narrative and I will show you why it is true. There is only one God, and alongside Him, there exist demons. These demons have been revered as gods in various regions throughout history, and even today, in countries like the United States. It is quite evident that even governments themselves engage in the worship of Satan through secret societies like the Illuminati. In ancient times, kings were well aware of the existence of these supernatural entities, as they possessed knowledge of witchcraft. As a result, they would go to the extreme of sacrificing their own children. Such actions were not taken lightly; they were driven by compelling evidence. These rulers had witnessed miracles and experienced the power of witchcraft firsthand. Across the globe, people have encountered diverse forms of supernatural power, leading them to worship these entities. In the present day, individuals seek evidence of a supernatural being through the study of creation. It is important to note that most scientists acknowledge that things do not occur randomly. For instance, between 1990-2000 most Nobel prize winner scientists were Christians (65% of Physics, 72% from Chemistry, 62% from Physiology or Medicine) How does one discern the true God? The true God is the one who has created everything, existing before creation and he is separate from his creation. He is the creator of space, time, and matter, thus existing outside of these realms. This definition unequivocally reveals the nature of the Christian God. Now, how can we be certain that the Bible is his divine word? Numerous archaeologists have discovered evidence that aligns precisely with the accounts written in the Bible. Furthermore, the Bible contains prophecies that accurately predict future events, which have come to pass. The most profound testament and prophecy within the Bible is the arrival of God's Son, Jesus Christ, who took on human form. He fulfilled approximately 314 prophecies from the Old Testament, including His resurrection from the dead, which he did and witnessed by over 500 of his disciples who were willing to sacrifice their lives for what they had seen. Remarkably, this book has been preserved throughout the ages, a testament to how God ensures the longevity of His message even in the present day. You may be wondering about other religions. Well, let me tell you, the top 6 religions that you can find with a simple Google search are Christian, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, folk religion, and irreligious people. Now, let's talk about Buddha. He was a remarkable philosopher who never claimed to be a god. Moving on to Hinduism, it emerged as a result of a collection of philosophies from various ideologies, including Theology. And then there's Islam. This religion, which came about 600 years after Christ, is based on the beliefs of one person who claimed to have never had a direct conversation with God (according to the Qur'an). Interestingly, this individual repeatedly affirms the teachings of the Bible, despite never having performed any miracles, as stated in the Qur'an. Christianity is centered around the belief in one God, who was worshipped by the Jewish people. According to the Bible, this God revealed Himself in the form of a person, Jesus Christ, who proved His divinity by dying and then rising from the dead. In Hinduism, Christ is regarded as an acharya, and it is acknowledged that He is the light of the world. Islam not only acknowledges the existence of Christ, but also affirms that He is the perfect person and the only righteous individual. However, Christ Himself never confirmed these beliefs. Instead, He explained that He is the only way to God, demonstrating how He embodies the truth, the life, and the sole path to the Father. He solidified His authority by casting out demons, who were worshipped as gods, thereby affirming their acknowledgment of Him. The list of examples supporting these claims could go on and on. It is worth noting that the majority of American presidents have believed in the Bible. Additionally, many renowned scientists throughout history, including Newton, Einstein, and Galileo, have professed their belief in God. Furthermore, there are numerous contemporary scientists who share this belief.
Since being led into apologetics due to the impossibility of abiogenesis, I've seen insects as the perfect combination of mechanical, structural, material, electrical and chemical engineering. This video opens a new, nearly infinite depth, to this complexity.
@@bipslone8880 because I'm reality we continue to grow and advance in knowledge and understanding, but the religious community doesn't. They have no other tools, so they have no choice but to repackage and resell the old broken crap.
@@mrhyde7600 How ironic when we consider that the founders of modern science, such as Newton, Galileo and Einstein, were actually theists. Additionally, the Church was the first organization to establish a university. With these facts in mind, it seems rather bold to claim that religious people don't strive for truth. * Even between 1990-2000 most Nobel prize winner scientists were Christians (65% of Physics, 72 from Chemistry, 62% from Physiology or Medicine) If we consider the possibility that religion is true, it would be the ultimate truth. Therefore, it's only natural for individuals to grow and develop their understanding towards this truth through nature. I must say, it brings me great joy to see that there are thousands of literate individuals who have become theists after honestly observing the world and making scientific discoveries. As for you let me ask you something. I'm curious, can you think of any observable examples, or perhaps even reasonable ones, where an explosion has resulted in extreme order, or at least some form of order? Is there any concrete evidence out there that shows a non-living object becoming viable, rather than simply decaying over time? I mean, if we take a look at our own planet, it seems to be the complete opposite of what the big bang theory suggests.
“The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.” Werner Heisenberg, a 1932
I was looking for this for a long time, documentaries that can explain what kinesin were?. Thank you for your video. Continue to share the greatness of our Creator. To God be all the glory
Let me ask adult theists the following: If god is an intelligent creator of the universe then he must have designed you to crap out dirty filthy stinking turds, to have stinking farts, and sometime have stinking wet farts in public. Now after you have a crap have a good look down the toilet at your excrement and think to yourself the intelligent designer designed you to do that. Now evolution doesn't have such a problem, it is simply a product of nature not a designer. Further if Jesus had healing powers why didn't the people find out where he crapped, collect his turds and use them to cure people? Holy crap they would have coined it in. Did Jesus ever say : I have a parable to tell you but I must go for a crap first? Did he fart in front of his disciples?Jesus supposedly fed the five thousand,where did the five thousand crap and pee? Did it not occur to Jesus to miraculously create toilet blocks with flush toilets, hand wash basins, electric hot air hand driers, showers, towels, soft toilet paper etc. No, You want a fairy tale Jesus who didn't crap, fart, have wet farts or go for a pee. You are all deluded!
Proteins are formed from amino acids using enzymes (huge proteins) according to information embedded in DNA... All cellular life has information regarding protein synthesis in their DNA... DNA is formed using numerous protein enzymes working together... according to directions found and utilized by other complex proteins... So... This just worked itself out? We haven't discussed the lipid bolster or the complex carbohydrate synthesis involved in cellular function..
What happens when there is no answer? Does that mean you can fill in your lack of understanding with a non-demonstrable god? GOD OF THE GAPS....... Yawn
@@bipslone8880 * knowing to say you shouldn't fill the gap with God simply doesn't mean we shouldn't. It's not a disprove * We don't believe in the bible just because there is no other explanation. If you think that way, it means you don't know the bible.
@@samuelg1013 why do you believe in god then? What's the underlying process in your brain that makes you believe in god? And not any god, I would presume that you believe in the christian god. Why that one and not others? Its completely arbitrarial and cultural, not a fact or anything that you can proove. And that's fine, but don't conclude that who doesn't believe in god is because he/she does'nt understand the bible.
@@iCaTPSA The topic at hand is the identification of a supernatural being responsible for creation. Through the act of questioning and reasoning, one endeavors to determine if there exists an entity who intentionally orchestrates events rather than things occurred by chance. Furthermore, the aspect of culture and gods serves as a compelling reason to consider the existence of a supernatural being. Why do people all over the world across generation believe in supernatural being? Do you think all people are dumb and didn't know anything? You may wonder, who is the true God? Why are there so many gods? For discussion let us take the Bible narrative and I will show you why it is true. There is only one God, and alongside Him, there exist demons. These demons have been revered as gods in various regions throughout history, and even today, in countries like the United States. It is quite evident that even governments themselves engage in the worship of Satan through secret societies like the Illuminati. In ancient times, kings were well aware of the existence of these supernatural entities, as they possessed knowledge of witchcraft. As a result, they would go to the extreme of sacrificing their own children. Such actions were not taken lightly; they were driven by compelling evidence. These rulers had witnessed miracles and experienced the power of witchcraft firsthand. Across the globe, people have encountered diverse forms of supernatural power, leading them to worship these entities. In the present day, individuals seek evidence of a supernatural being through the study of creation. It is important to note that most scientists acknowledge that things do not occur randomly. For instance, between 1990-2000 most Nobel prize winner scientists were Christians (65% of Physics, 72% from Chemistry, 62% from Physiology or Medicine) How does one discern the true God? The true God is the one who has created everything, existing before creation and he is separate from his creation. He is the creator of space, time, and matter, thus existing outside of these realms. This definition unequivocally reveals the nature of the Christian God. Now, how can we be certain that the Bible is his divine word? Numerous archaeologists have discovered evidence that aligns precisely with the accounts written in the Bible. Furthermore, the Bible contains prophecies that accurately predict future events, which have come to pass. The most profound testament and prophecy within the Bible is the arrival of God's Son, Jesus Christ, who took on human form. He fulfilled approximately 314 prophecies from the Old Testament, including His resurrection from the dead, which he did and witnessed by over 500 of his disciples who were willing to sacrifice their lives for what they had seen. Remarkably, this book has been preserved throughout the ages, a testament to how God ensures the longevity of His message even in the present day. You may be wondering about other religions. Well, let me tell you, the top 6 religions that you can find with a simple Google search are Christian, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, folk religion, and irreligious people. Now, let's talk about Buddha. He was a remarkable philosopher who never claimed to be a god. Moving on to Hinduism, it emerged as a result of a collection of philosophies from various ideologies, including Theology. And then there's Islam. This religion, which came about 600 years after Christ, is based on the beliefs of one person who claimed to have never had a direct conversation with God (according to the Qur'an). Interestingly, this individual repeatedly affirms the teachings of the Bible, despite never having performed any miracles, as stated in the Qur'an. Christianity is centered around the belief in one God, who was worshipped by the Jewish people. According to the Bible, this God revealed Himself in the form of a person, Jesus Christ, who proved His divinity by dying and then rising from the dead. In Hinduism, Christ is regarded as an acharya, and it is acknowledged that He is the light of the world. Islam not only acknowledges the existence of Christ, but also affirms that He is the perfect person and the only righteous individual. However, Christ Himself never confirmed these beliefs. Instead, He explained that He is the only way to God, demonstrating how He embodies the truth, the life, and the sole path to the Father. He solidified His authority by casting out demons, who were worshipped as gods, thereby affirming their acknowledgment of Him. The list of examples supporting these claims could go on and on. It is worth noting that the majority of American presidents have believed in the Bible. Additionally, many renowned scientists throughout history, including Newton, Einstein, and Galileo, have professed their belief in God. Furthermore, there are numerous contemporary scientists who share this belief.
@@Gamer7z7 Yeap nothing new. Religious fanatics denying truth. Seriously if you watch other of his videos, this guy is clearly a Bible fanatic. Probably hurting more Christians than anything else.
Alright!!! I've been looking for this information for so long, I read an article (by Answers in Genesis, no less!) years ago about kinesin and their complexity, but I couldn't find it. I tried bringing it up to an atheist acquaintance, but I couldn't remember what they were called and he just shrugged it off. I literally just prayed that I would find this info for the next time I see him, and here it is! Our Creator is amazing.
@@Bomtombadi1I posted a microbiology vid 3x and 3x that was deleted. I've had over 3,000 posts deleted. Some key words trigger them for me and I've had to get smarter than the algorithm. My background is computer science, biology, genetics and forensics. It got deleted because it's a science link. Happens all the time. That's not a conspiracy theory, that's a tragedy of information locking by YT.
Amen, God is the Almighty. He is the only one worshipped in heaven. (See Revelation 4&5) Though Christ our Redeemer was present, only the one on the throne "who lives forever and ever" was worshipped. Like the frog in the pot of water that is slowly heated until it is too late for the frog, the belief that Hod and Jesus were one began yo be taught around the beginning of the 4th century. Then later in the century it went from worshipping a "binity" (2) to a trinity (3). Previous to the mid yo late 4th century, the Holy Spirit wasn't considered God. This is all in Scripture. We have been slowly lead to believing that there a three-in-one hod, when no where the Bible is this taught. Repeatedly Paul states "God and the Lord Jesus Christ," or a similar reference, showing the two as distinct individuals. In the KJV, 1 John 3:16 states: Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren." The wird God isn't in the oldest manuscripts. It was added. Looking at the context of the chapter, it is talking about Jesus, not God. Slowly, like the water, Scripture is changed until we'remisled by the enemy. This verse, 1 John 5:7-8, was not originally found in the Codex except in margin by a different handwriting. "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one". This isn't found in any manuscript before the 15th century. But at some point around this time period, it began showing up as a verse in Scripture. Again, slight changes that aren't corrected lead to a perception that is far off base, missing the mark of truth. Pray, study, and ask for wisdom. 2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
O Lord, my God, When I, in awesome wonder, consider all the works Thy hands have made, I see the stars, I hear the rolling thunder, Thy power throughout the universe displayed, Then sings my soul, my Savior God, to Thee, How great Thou art! How great Thou art!
Evolved?! The Laws of Thermodynamics pretty much put the kibosh on the whole "evolutionary" fairytale. Any scientist worth his salt knows that only intelligence can create data. Data simply and intrinsically CANNOT originate from any fantastical primordial soup. 😂
@@redleaf2383then how did god come into existence? You claim god must have created this world and humans because we are so complex, but god is a million times more complex, so how does he exist without a creator?
What is man, that you are mindful of him? The son of man that you visit him? In otherwords, we were on God's mind to the degree that he booked a trip to visit us.❤ 🤯
On the galactic level, to the molecular level, the more we find out, the less we know. Gaining human knowledge is like the Mandelbrot set. It is never ending.
1:46: 🤖 Robots inside cells? The incredible motor protein kinesin operates like tiny biological robots. 4:17: 🧬 Kinesin proteins are miniature motor proteins inside living things that transport cargo within cells and operate at a complex level of micro-biotechnology. 9:34: 🔧 The complexity of cellular processes, such as the assembly and delivery of a needed part, is impressive and requires sophisticated systems and intelligence. 10:44: 💡 Kinesin proteins are incredibly efficient, powerful, and fast, with the ability to navigate around obstructions and coordinate their efforts. They play a crucial role in cell division and neurotransmitter transportation. 14:04: 🔬 Cells, specifically kinesin, exhibit remarkable efficiency and complex functions that surpass modern nanotechnology, suggesting a creator. 17:31: 🧬 The existence of complex features like kinesin challenges the idea of evolution and supports the biblical account of creation. 21:01: 🤔 The author argues that the complexity of technology and living organisms points to the existence of a Creator God. Recap by Tammy AI
@sarahhales8728 This is because you're only examining things which you know are explicitly designed. You're arguing that everything that we know is designed, which consequently appears designed, means EVERYTHING that appears designed is designed. This is like saying that every snake we have ever seen slithers, therefore confirming that everything that slithers is a snake, which is false. Do you see your error?
But that is exactly what you are saying when you claim that God created the world even though you can't understand how. But it must have "happened" because the world exists. The difference is that the science of evolution actually does show how it happens.
Science agrees. In no way did anything in the universe just get ''poofed into existence by an incantation spell''. At least there's zero evidence to suggest that.
@@jockyoung4491 why do i have to understand “how?” And my God actually gave me (you I’m not so sure about) a brain to think, reason and yes even Question him, and the word of God. “Come let us reason together” it says. And if you think I’m some ignorant fop that never questions the existence of God you’d be dead wrong. If you believe this all just happened then you’re exercising more Faith than i have 😂 Your “god” is a dead, hopeless ideology, that promotes intolerance and bigotry.
@@jockyoung4491 evolution is not science… science must be observable and provable of which it is neither. That’s why it’s a “ theory”. If it was probable as you say, then why haven’t they found the “missing” link ? You’re statement that it shows how it happened is false… it’s one man who hated God after his child died and decided to spend his life disproving God. You’re more ignorant than I am. 😂
It is impossible for the molecular interacting and inter working complexities and coordination of even the simplest cell to have developed incrementally. Without all working together the cell would die.
I've studied biology in high school. I've studies Anatomy and Physiology in college. No matter how I try, I can't reconcile life from non-life; even when I consider environmental conditions that may be involved. I can't even describe the process of protein synthesis.
Nobody knows how it happened, but that doesn't mean it couldn't, and scientists are trying to find out all the time. But regardless of how life begain, we know that it then evolved.
@@jockyoung4491 We don't "know" that. It is assumed. To go from even a simple protocell to a cell as we know it in all lifeforms would be like comparing a wheel to a bus. The unit of evolution is the cell. Yet the cell exhibits all the hallmarks of exquisite design. Kinesin, marvelous as it is, is just one protein among hundreds or thousands that must have been present in the hypothetical "last universal common ancestor." Design is just a much better explanation, even if it deflates the egos and funding of certain scientists and branches of science.
@@onedirection2301 Of course it is assumed. Everything about abiogenesis is assumed. We don't know how it happened so people are free to believe whatever they want to. I'm usually content with "I don't know". But abiogenesis is an independent question.. However life got started, we can all agree that it DID get started. And then it evolved. THAT we do know for sure.
Excellent video. First rate graphics and animations, and Calvin is a fine narrator - he has natural modulation in his voice that make the information presented interesting and easy to follow.
@@paulspence7600 If you aren't ignorant of science you'd already know evolution is in the dumps and the weakest the theory has ever been. Biologists have flat out been trying to replace it for awhile. It doesn't work. Whether this video conveyed it or not no clue I just started it.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Well, I do have a doctorate in virology and have been an active researcher in several fields of biological science for about 30 years. I can tell you for a fact that evolutionary theory is fine and healthy and I don't know any scientist who disputes that. As for working, there have been many books written about its ability to predict (which is necessary for a scientific theory). I guess you are the scientifically ignorant one.
@@paulspence7600 Maybe 1980 you kept up with the state of evolution in academia but clearly no more given how ignorant your position is. It doesn't work, it has countless foundational critical issues, and biologists have been trying to wholly replace the model for awhile now. There was a big conference on it back in 2016. I'll help you out further. Renowned biologist Denis Noble has given the explicit statement and given evidence for it "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate. Why because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like epigenetic complexity." Genomes don't improve over time they degrade. Virus data like John Sanford on H1N1 the spanish flu shows this. Human genome from encode has shown every generation humans have 100 mutations. The only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller said just 1 mutation per generation in humans means there is no evolution explanation humanity is progressing in the opposite direction 1 per generation is deadly, yet we find out the number is 100. The human genome is degrading not progressing to a better state. This shouldn't be a shock, as information theory states information degrades, and information is the basis of life. All the beneficial mutations in biology like the famous citrate metabolism in ecoli or antibiotic resistance are not from gain or improvement in genetic information, but reductive evolution. A degrading or loss of information crippling a function in the organism that produces a beneficial effect while still being a loss of genetic function. As the famous Lenski experiment showed. There is no evolutionary pressure to create building blocks of mechanisms that don't yet exist. Evolution does not have foresight. Mindless matter and mutation can't manifest code. That's rationality from irrationality. That's a reality breaking concept. If you can get such a deus ex machina mechanism that does that it invalidates all human achievement and personhood because then the universe did it all. This is why the multiverse theory is so absurd. This is why all of naturalism is absurd because it's predicated on such a deus ex machina mechanism that does not exist. Darwin's Origin never explains the origin of species -- and this is stated by David Berlinski no less. How does chance determine when to stop at the "desired" outcome? The concept of evolution is nonsense. It's not even falsifiable(all results explainable and not reproducible) so really shouldn't even be called a scientific theory. It fits the criteria for being defined as mythology ironically. Could also point out y chromosome adam and mitochondrial eve data shows humans had two ancestors and did not evolve. Shocker the dating is roughly 6000-7500 years just like the biblical genealogy dating going back to Eden, and the dating is quite accurate in a general sense as it's just averaging mutations per generation then counting back to when they stop appearing. The list goes on and on and on. We could go into the Cambrian explosion evidence of countless biological structures such as virtually every eye design and body plan allowed by physics showing up in a geological instant no evolution, we could show random number generator studies for probability of words/language manifesting, or a study on evolutionary probability of extinction of over 5000 mammal species related to size increases showing mammals can't evolutionary evolve over 3kg. Darwinian evolution is a mythology of magic(rationality from irrationality), it's pseudo science and also invokes time of the gaps and god of the gaps along with all the other issues no less.
I am an evolutionist while maintaining a belief that extends beyond atheism. The magnificence of the universe is truly awe-inspiring, surpassing the limited capacity of our minds to comprehend. Often theistic folks think that science is inherently atheistic. However, science is a systematic study of the world through observation, experimentation, and the development of testable theories. Through scientific studies, we have gained a comprehensive understanding of evolution-how it has occurred, is occurring, and will continue to occur. It would be unwise to confine our thoughts within rigid boundaries and cling to pre-established beliefs. Scientists are not opposed to religion; in fact, great scientists are open-minded, philosophical thinking, and have ability to appreciate diverse perspectives. While Kinesin is indeed fascinating, there exist countless other intricate systems , harmoniously interplaying the building blocks of the universe. A symphony we humans can't begin to comprehend. Happy to have a healthy conversation in the thread.
Since the Creator exists outside of the Universe, there is no time and space, no past, present or future. The Bible was written for the Hebrews in terms they could understand. Why would God need to “rest” on the seventh day? There ARE no days in God’s existence, no time or space because the Creator was outside of the universe when it was created with all the laws of gravity, physics and so on that make it run in an orderly fashion. So eternity is basically a state of non time: no past, no present, no future. The “days” in the Bible were a way of relating to a very uneducated, superstitious people how they could relate to how the world came into existence. If someone came along now and told this story, does anyone think anybody would take them seriously?
@@kerrythomas6220 Hello, that's a good question but you would need to read in context. You see the Bible already states he created time before he even rested which is why he stated in the beginning take into account this is not God's beginning but the beginning of Creation "In the beginning (time) God created the heaven (space) and the earth (matter)." Taking this passage into account God created time first which is why he does mention rest, now you may ask but if God is outside how could he rest you have to also take into account that God can enter time one example of this is Jesus even do God can be outside he can also be inside by his own will. Hope this clears things out a bit more, God bless good sir!
@@calvinsmith7575 Let's eat kids. Let's eat, kids. Comma's are important. But thanks for confirming you ignorance all while trying to be condescending.
@@nathancook2852 Comma's are important? So are apostrophes. What about "confirming you ignorance?" Missing a character is not a sin. Failing to develop one IS. Apparently some people really do live in glass houses. lol
My own reconstruction: a micelle containing rRNA, all 61 tRNA, two mRNAs coding for reverse transcriptase and DNA polymerase and all 20 amino acids. Result is a cell with DNA. Possible it can multiply
Amazingly well done, apparently true, and easy to understand! I could watch this sort of content for hours on end! This is just wonderful, I appreciate you so very much!
The video is not intellectually honest, misrepresents the scientific consensus, shows a clear lack of understanding of the theory of evolution, and argues from personal incredulity. That's the summary at least.
@@Yamyatosregarding "Scientific Consensus", Science is not based on concensus. That said, if you find errors in what he is saying, I would love to hear the specific error you believe was stated, and what the evidence is for it being wrong. Those are great discussions to have. Just throwing out statements like they show "a clear lack of understanding of the theory of evolution" whith out bothering to give examples is not helpful.
@@modernarcheology2868 Science is not about voting what you want to be true, no. However, there is an intellectual discussion going on, where scientists do research based on previous publications, to correct and/or improve them, and thus generally advance the understanding of the scientific community. The "scientific consensus" is a description of the knowledge agreed upon by the supermajority of scientists. Dont take it too literally. It basically means "our current scientific knowledge". Yet, even honest scientists wont always agree on some small details that are currently being researched, and there will always be some people who got their degree by normal means, to then use it and represent opinions they cant support. Ironically this is decently often done by creationists. They usually dont even write publications. If they do they are useless (measured in citations) to the discussion, and if they represent the opinion they hold openly about the topic in their publications these papers wouldnt even make it through peer review, since they are demonstrably wrong - or if they are lucky they get reviewed by another creationists. That's why the "scientific consensus" is indeed important. It is the only thing a layman of any given topic can rely on to tell apart the opinions from the science. If you want my response on the things wrong with this video, i wrote one as a standalone comment. You should find it if you scroll down a bit. This was one of those days where i felt like debunking some bullshit, but quite frankly there isnt even an argument being made here. It's literally all personal incredility, mixed with a couple arguments from ignorance.
@@Yamyatos Completely disagree with you and you offer nothing to rebut or refute what was explained in this video. It completely defies ration and logic to believe or think that lifeforms randomly developed from base matter and elements into such complex organisms. Also having a lifeforce that no one can explain or duplicate. Evolution says no reason to the start of "life" to happen, no sentient factors, or impetus.
@@BuckJackson-kc8pb Did you read my comment? I guess ill just quote myself to answer your first sentence..: "If you want my response on the things wrong with this video, i wrote one as a standalone comment. You should find it if you scroll down a bit. This was one of those days where i felt like debunking some bullshit, but quite frankly there isnt even an argument being made here. It's literally all personal incredility, mixed with a couple arguments from ignorance." The above video is directed at people who simply seek to reinforce their already existing bias. *You* the other hand argue about yet another topic. The theory of evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life. Evolution explains speciation, ie diversity of life. It makes no statement about or presupposed any specific origin of life, whatsoever. Abiogenesis is our current attempt at explaining the origin of life, and unlike evolution, it is not a scientific theory, but a hypothesis. These are two entirely separate topics. If you have an issue with evolution, i would start by arguing against .. evolution. Yet even on abiogenesis, the only argument you brought forth is personal incredulity. Just because you cannot comprehend how something could be true, doesnt make it false. Also what on earth is a "lifeforce"?
When I studied Physiology and Anatomy I would be absolutely stunned at how our bodies work down to the tiniest signals and molecules, and I knew right then that only God has made us in his infinite wisdom and detail.
@paulspence7600 zyes evolution of many species does play a very slow part in it all, but we are definately created with huge genetic upgrades at least every 1000 yrs or so. By someone, and the incredible workmanship of a human body did not form by chance!
There's more evidence of the Bible telling the truth and God existing than all of the names you typed there. The reliability of the Bible being true can be proven by how much the prophecies in the Bible are accurate. There are 2,500 prophecies in the whole Bible. 2,000 of them have already been fulfilled, leaving 500 that are still to be fulfilled. This alone proves that the Bible can be trusted and be true.
@@mirandahotspring4019 , There is only One God. Seek him. He says that those who truly seek him, will find him: "But if from there you seek the LORD your God, you will find him if you seek him with all your heart and with all your soul." DT 4:29. To your point about all the different gods people have described, just because someone says something is a God, doesn't make it a God. But, it is rational to state we are created and therefore seeking our creator is a worthy task. Cliff notes: start with the bible, book of Genesis, chapter 1. Absolutely incredible.
@@modernarcheology2868 Genesis is absolute nonsense! Let there be light and there was light, but the sun and stars weren't created until day 4! Did god have a flashlight sticking out his arse or something? A day is defined as one rotation of the earth as it orbits the sun, but if the sun wasn't created until day four, how did we have day 1, 2 and 3? God creates all the plants on day three but doesn't create the sun until day four. I guess he flunked photosynthesis while he was at god school! Genesis is nothing but the myths of middle eastern iron age goatherders who didn't know where the sun went at nighttime! Its not real!
Looks like a fantastic video, & am super keen to carry on watching it (I've gotten to the 4th minute). Could I kindly request that you re-produce it, & drop the music track by half? The music is usually there to support the main monologue, not equal it or overbear it. Thanks so much, look forward to watching the rest of it when it's re-mixed!! Jon
23:20 sheer diversity and interdependence of millions of living creatures to exist is a simple and obvious reason to believe in creation not in evolution. bless you for your work that brings honor and glory to our creator.
Interesting to learn about, thank you! "Even the foolishness of God is beyond the wisdom of man." If the Lord God were to give us even a glimpse into what it meant when He simply said "let there be light...", It would melt our brain.
1 Corinthians CH 1 verse 25 and CH 2 verse14 &15 shows that he's knows much more than man and that people looking at the physical plane only can't understand much at all
Look all you so called TH-camrs, this is how you tell a story, to keep people interested in what message that you are trying to deliver. Not that trendy way, where you just ramble away at the speed of sound, making everyone else listening, just zone out.
2:06 When you say “everything makes itself” it makes me laugh. I hadnt thought of it like that before, as i like to say, where there is design there are rules, rules/laws require what to function? Either conscious effort on the ruled, or some sort of “police/lawyer/jury” situation to enforce them. Tell me, who enforces that a frequency of light shall be a certain color? Who enforces gravity? Who tells the copper atom to be inclined to let electrons pass through it? And if the thing itself enforces its own rules and regulations, what gives it the power to choose how it will be?
I recently was a naturalist. I never denied God or a great creator but Ive recently had a spiritual awakening. I thought as a naturalist that I had a very open mind but have realized very recently that I was not as open minded as I thought I was.
I have a degree in biology with lots of chemistry. I grew up with religion, but curiosity about my life remained in my genes! Intelligence grows with Improved technology and dynamics of information reflected in the tree of life, etc., plus added info reflected in this film. The dynamics of life deserves attention as revealed here and deserves attention and views.
@@stephenmason5682That’s the result of marxists taking over the education system and infiltrating the bureaucracies. An ignorant populace is more easily controlled.
There's nothing informative about this video, especially if you're Really a biologist. All it does is try to abuse scientific data to prove to anti scientific assumption. Maliciously so, even.
But wait, it gets even better: the history of life on Earth shows not the gradual incremental evolution of Darwin, but quite the opposite, a punctuated sequence of ever more advanced life forms that spring into existence fully formed and then remain essentially unchanged with only minor variations from then on. Which just so happens to correspond to the order given in Genesis. Simply to get the sequence of events in the right order alone is extremely unlikely. How many miraculous coincidences do we need?
Just because we can't find fossils of a specie's early development does not mean it "sprang into existence fully formed". Almost NO individual animals ever turned into fossils. We're trying to read a book using a few fragments found in the shredder. And you're ASSUMING the content of the missing pages.
@@DavidByrden1 Young earthers make the silliest assumptions. It's so funny. I've debated many of them. They even have to make some crazy assumptions that the laws of physics were vastly different in the past (without any evidence of this) in order to argue that the universe is young. It's the only way they can attempt to argue for such a position.
Adding time just makes it more impossible. Why do people keep saying more time should help? With biological systems, things must happen in a fraction of a second, and all the parts need to be in place. If you have one protein formed, and you wait a year for the second, by then the first one has decomposed! Unless all the proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and DNA are there simultaneously are there fully developed at the very beginning, the first cell could never survive one second! Moreover you need many copies of the same proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, etc to exist in the very first cell right from the beginning, and in the right places, fully functional and somehow knowing what they have to do, and marvel of marvels, the DNA that they tell us also appeared by chance at the same time in the same cell just HAPPENS to encode exactly those very proteins in that cell! And it must have had the ability to duplicate itself and the desire to do so for the very first cell not to just die, but to produce more cells like it. Like, really??? Do they think we are total idiots to actually believe this happened by chance???
I’m agree there’s two different modes of reasoning here, and they need to be more explicit. Disproving material process doesn’t necessarily lead right to orthodox Christian belief, just that there’s a mind at the heart of reality.
Thank you for this video! God is so awesome! There is no way this evolved from nothing that is nonsense. God created everything and in such a marvelous way! It cannot be duplicated. Praise our God! I pray this video will open evolutionist eyes to the truth
You're right - the idea that everything evolved from nothing _is_ nonsense, and that's why evolutionists don't assert it. Yet creationists keep trying to insist that they do.
@@MrReasonabubbleI'm a creationist and I didn't realize evolutionists don't believe everything evolved out of nothing. I think we say that because of the "and where did that come from, and before that, and before that," line of questioning until we get back to the very beginning. What do you believe everything came from in the very beginning, if you don't mind my asking? I'd like to understand your perspective.
@@bipslone8880 The only "gap" is in your education and upbringing. You must be unstudied, and woefully undereducated. I've spent my life in studying history, philosophy, major religions, and my university education was in biology and biomedical science. I have multiple degrees, and I actually understand what I'm seeing in the cellular components. If you had any higher mathematics or real biology, or astronomy, you would be a Christian. The fool says in his heart there is no God. Fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.
@@globalcoupledances You don't understand the problem. You have heard the word Evolution, and you believe it can explain things it could never be applied to. I detect in your writing the hint that English is a second language for you. It might interest you to know that Darwin and Lyell were collaborating to propose an argument to justify the extermination of "primitive " people, meaning people who are not Anglo European. Read Darwin's "Descent of Man", and you'll get the idea. You are defending the idea that certain people can be killed off without any cosmic consequences, to "save the world ", of course. You want to be careful who you believe. Some elitist oligarchs who believe in Evolution want to reduce the population of the world to only 500 million people. Coincidentally, that's about the number of Anglo European people in the world. We are all one blood, descended from Adam and Eve and Noah. There are no "primitive people ". Neo-Darwinists are really Neo-Nazis. They don't like religion, because Christians oppose their murderous plans.
I believe it takes a lot more blind faith to be an atheist and believe in evolution than it does to believe an Omnipotent being created all this, gave us instructions, which we didn't follow, then came down, lived among us and rose to life after we murdered him on trumpted charges. Or maybe most atheists are just pi$$ed off at God and feel ignoring him and leading others to ignore him is the best they can do for revenge. I'm open to hearing any athesist's argument.
THANK YOU so much for this. I am a little apprehensive to say what I am thinking, because I have loved AIG for so very many years, and I do not want to appear to be a skeptic or even a critic. I love you all! I am grateful. Most of my grandchildren and many friends were educated with AIG Home School material. ******* So, if you can receive this in the meekness that I hope to deliver it, I must say AIG is getting much better at producing general consumption videos. You have always had the wonder-filled truth, but have not always presented it with the caliber of skill seen here. (ouch, I’m so sorry) This is very encouraging to me, because even though I have watched many AIG videos for years, I have never been so excited to share them as now. This is WELL DONE! I’m sending it out! Thank you for the upgrade!
Sorry drhompson they stole this from a much older animation released on TH-cam years ago. This takes skill and understanding of complex processes to create; way beyond the capabilities of aig I'm sorry to say.
@@taylorbullard2118 Thank you for sharing that. Perhaps even our mentioning and discussing this will reach the right decision makers. I know it takes hard-to-come-by money to produce high quality videos, so I harbor no ill will. AIG has been very wise in concentrating on important matters, so I mean no disparagement at all.
@guitarszen I do not think of myself as "religious," but I do believe that Jesus Christ is exactly who he said he is and will always do exactly what He said he will do. I am a very flawed follower of him. Therefore, I try to be open to legitimate criticism. A salient feature of wisdom is gratefully accepting legitimate correction. I'm not claiming to be wise, but it is an ideal. So, (A) it would be helpful if you could be specific with examples of what you, yourself, have witnessed in your own lifetime in your specific circumstance. That is, "terrible things to people (or you) that do not believe as they do." And, (B) have you also witnessed the oppostie of what you are pointing out? Thank you. I appriciate your frankness.
Brilliant! Thank you. No-Mind Process (evolution)- succinct way of exposing the Great Flaw for critical thinkers & support for those who are learning to think critically- not to mention "we have no excuse" being His handiwork, within & without.❤
@@LordMathious Sorry but to put it nicely you haven't the vaguest clue about the state of evolutionary theory in the academic field. It doesn't work, it has countless foundational critical issues, and biologists have been trying to wholly replace the model for awhile now. There was a big conference on it back in 2016. I'll help you out further. You can believe your mythology of magic but don't pretend that pseudo science is real, thanks. Renowned biologist Denis Noble has given the explicit statement and given evidence for it "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate. Why because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like epigenetic complexity." Genomes don't improve over time they degrade. Virus data like John Sanford on H1N1 the spanish flu shows this. Human genome from encode has shown every generation humans have 100 mutations. The only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller said just 1 mutation per generation in humans means there is no evolution explanation humanity is progressing in the opposite direction 1 per generation is deadly, yet we find out the number is 100. The human genome is degrading not progressing to a better state. This shouldn't be a shock, as information theory states information degrades, and information is the basis of life. All the beneficial mutations in biology like the famous citrate metabolism in ecoli or antibiotic resistance are not from gain or improvement in genetic information, but reductive evolution. A degrading or loss of information crippling a function in the organism that produces a beneficial effect while still being a loss of genetic function. As the famous Lenski experiment showed. There is no evolutionary pressure to create building blocks of mechanisms that don't yet exist. Evolution does not have foresight. Mindless matter and mutation can't manifest code. That's rationality from irrationality. That's a reality breaking concept. If you can get such a deus ex machina mechanism that does that it invalidates all human achievement and personhood because then the universe did it all. This is why the multiverse theory is so absurd. This is why all of naturalism is absurd because it's predicated on such a deus ex machina mechanism that does not exist. Darwin's Origin never explains the origin of species -- and this is stated by David Berlinski no less. How does chance determine when to stop at the "desired" outcome? The concept of evolution is nonsense. Could also point out y chromosome adam and mitochondrial eve data shows humans had two ancestors and did not evolve. Shocker the dating is roughly 6000-7500 years just like the biblical genealogy dating going back to Eden, and the dating is quite accurate in a general sense as it's just averaging mutations per generation then counting back to when they stop appearing. The list goes on and on and on. We could go into the Cambrian explosion, we could show random number generator studies for probability, or studies on evolutionary probability of mammals as size increases and so on. Darwinian evolution is a mythology of magic(rationality from irrationality), it's pseudo science and also invokes time of the gaps and god of the gaps along with all the other issues no less.
@gregpeterson3144 Yes, that everything occurred by chance, even though it's virtually impossible, that life came from non-life and no one can prove it or reproduce it, or that the laws of physics and mathematics were a random occurrence, and that structure and order, such as DNA came from chaos and disorder - because who cares about the 2nd law of thermodynamics. 😂
Because this video was specifically created to give you tidbits of complex topics, served as simple with simple answers. It uses design features which are known to push the human mind towards an audiovisual pleasure. Does your class have music in the background and the teacher speaking from a script to fit the background music? No, for it isn't engineered like that.
"Thank you for shedding light on the fascinating connection between science and the Bible. It's incredible to realize that the Bible holds the wisdom of creation, and as humans, we're only beginning to grasp the profound intricacies of nature's complex system. May this video reach skeptics and lead them towards discovering the truth. In Jesus' name, may knowledge and understanding flourish." 🙏📖🔬
Not only by chance. First, order had to come from an explosion. Then, life had to appear somehow as a single cell. Next, the single cell skipped the two cell and jumped into male and female, then created lungs and a nose at the same time. Impossible is an understatement.
@@MastaE2288 Nothing in that comment is scientifically accurate. All scientific claims abotu evolution have to be logical and believable, or they wouldn't be accepted. Scientists are not stupid.
@@jockyoung4491 Why do you keep talking about science? I am not a scientist and don't have any test labs at home. What I do have is a brain. Now when I said there was an explosion, are you saying there wasn't an explosion? When I said it is claimed that life began as a single cell, is that wrong? Is it claimed that all life came from a single cell?
Only an author can tell you the ending from the beginning, which is exactly what father God almighty has done, giving mankind his word, the Holy Bible and our Christ Jesus. The proof is there, one must only look and acknowledge it. The "Theory" of Evolution cannot offer such proof.
This argument against evolution goes back to a time before Charles Darwin. It was first proposed by William Paley in 1802. It was dealt with by Richard Dawkins in his book "The Blind Watchmaker". Complexity can arise by completely natural means. Random changes pushed along by selection pressure is all that is necessary.
@peskyfervid6515 Richard Dawkins in his book "Climbing Mount Improbable" claims to explain the accumulation of "random changes" by which life 'arose'. He puts it like this: "begins in what has been called the primeval soup, a weak broth of simple organic chemicals in the sea. Nobody knows how it happened but, somehow, without violating the laws of physics and chemistry, a molecule arose that just happened to have the property of self-copying-a replicator." Just like that a self replicating molecule 'arose'. Simultaneously the replication mechanism described in this post had already arisen and was present with a supply of building materials and available energy to replicate this 'self-replicating molecule'. We are required to believe that all this and much more complexity happend in one jump.
@@helpmaboab7 Again, that is just the argument from personal incredulity. However, even if we accept that life began in a miraculous event. it is quite clear that once it began, it progressed by random mutation and selective pressure. Worthwhile to remember that almost all life that has existed on earth is extinct. What would be the point of that from a creative designer perspective? Would it be god failing over and over again? Remember also that for near 3 billion years life on earth consisted of microbes. Then, with some event that happens very seldom, a more complex organism emerged. Who knows what event that was. From this remove it's difficult to say. Yet there is the evidence. Microbial life existed for billions of years. Then, about 500 million years ago (or so) more complex forms emerged.
evolution is disproven by every scientific study and paper since Darwin gave his opinion of his observations. we all know there is a Creator. it's inherent.
@@mikerussell2590 Just saying doesn't make it true. In fact, all of the discoveries since the days of Darwin confirm evolution. From the studies of Mendel to the discovery of DNA in genetics. From the geology of Charles Lyell to the modern understanding of how the earth's crust works. From Isaac Newton to Einstein, to quantum physics. All of these confirm, time and again, the framework of evolution. If evolution is not happening, nothing in the natural world makes any sense. If you can't accept that, that's too bad.
@@peskyfervid6515 we don't have an accurate dating method to prove the age of this planet, it is honestly a stack of presupposition stacked on top of presuppositions... and a curricula that openly mocks and derides creationism, likening it to a chain holding humanity's progress back. The authors always speak as though they where there when it all happened. evolution operates on blind faith.
Jesus revised much of the Old Testament. Connecting with nature for the truth does not give us truth. John 7:24 KJV "Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment". How do we get righteous judgment? "That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." Prayer
What just popped into my mind is that the microtubule walkway the kinesin uses has a definite *address* to which it leads that cargo carried by the kinesin. How does that address get set? What triggers the setting of that address? Also - so far no one seems to have figured out just how all the ingredients, i.e. packages magically gets retrieved and loaded - where is it stored and how it it retrieved?
@@globalcoupledances That's like saying just load my Amazon package in a truck on a road. It will get to my house eventually.... no need for an address.
Calvin Smith: "evolutionists will claim that this protein is the result of chance". Yes 1/64 of all mutations creates a new protein coding gene. Kinesin is an example
This is a brilliant video, clearly illuminating the complexity of a cell. And imagine, our bodies have over 50 trillion cells!!! Amazing example of intelligent design.
@@kevinkelly2162 If we knew that we would be gods too. We can’t know how He did it because we live within finite limits and our lives are governed by time, whereas God exists as an infinite being, outside of time altogether. How can we possibly comprehend such a thing.
@@jockyoung4491not sure about that. My latest read “Genetic entropy” seems to make a solid case against evolutionary biology, like essentially everything else I have been reading, from both sides.
@@jean-jacqueslavigne3109 Except there is a great deal of evidence for INCREASED genetic information over time. Don't get your science from Christian apologists. they obviously have an agenda.
With respect, It's normal to interperate biological systems as some kind of miniature technology. We didn't really appreciate cells and their organelles until Ford developed the industrial process line. In that way, we realised that the cell actually works like a microscopic factory. So it is not necessarily proof of a creater that biological systems appear to be designed, rather we can use our own technology to understand them in an analogous way.
Wow, it’s phenomenal envisaging these micro-processes and the programming required. I have always marvelled at the complexity and wonders of space but this blew me away even more. “For in a fear inspiring way I am wonderfully made” Thank you YeHoVaH and praise Yehoshua
@@darrylwolfe7359 Why would God require a creator? God is independent of space time he has mastery over it as proven by the creation of this space time as the space time theorems show the universe had a finite start. That argument is only relevant in the reverse, who creator your creator the universe since you hold to the argument created needs creator, and you clearly are created. I'll be waiting for the answer.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Why would god require a creator? Thats not up to you bro. You can pretend that you know everything but at the end of the day, you are just guessing. You say that because its convenient for you. You say otherwise, youd be doubting your god in the process. Reality is, you can never prove it because you are just a simple man with simple capabilities. You obviously dont get the point im trying to make here. Religious people always say that the DNA of human is so complex that they concluded there had to be a creator. But with God, whos like a BILLION times more complex, suddenly he can exist on his own. THat doesnt make sense. Its like saying you saw a TOY HOUSE made out of legos and concluded that there had to be a builder. But then he is asked about the Eiffel tower and he says it has always been there and nobody had built it.
@@darrylwolfe7359 No no I do know. Upgrade your reading comprehension I presented the clear logic demonstrating why God does not need a creator. I'll spoon fed it to you again read closely. This is exactly the response given by Oxford Mathematician John Lennox and Astrophysicist Hugh Ross and many other academics in this exact field just fyi. God logically doesn't need a creator. That argument redefines God, nor is it the God described in this conversation or described by cosmology. The spacetime theorems prove that the cosmic spacetime dimensions were created at the beginning of the universe. These theorems imply that the cosmic spacetime dimensions came from One who has the power to create spacetime dimensions. Clearly, that One is not subject to the spacetime dimensions he created. It's a poor argument that is redefining God to be constrained by their own space time creation which is never the claim at least the Christian one or one from a scientific perspective, so that would be a good argument against Hinduism for example. But not the Christian God, the first cause of the big bang. It's only a valid argument in reverse, who created your creator the universe and biology who created you? Since you hold to the argument of created needing a creator.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep God does not need a creator. Thats just an opinion. Just because you believe, it doesnt mean it is. Does mentioning Mathematicians and Astrophysicists prove your point? Are you telling me no scientist out there will disagree with you? Are you telling me that one day god just woke up and believed he had always existed and never wondered how he got his powers?? Really? YOu said that the cosmic spacetime dimensions came from One who has the power to create spacetime dimensions. Based on that, how do you know it was a god who did it? Maybe it was aliens who did it. With your limited knowledge and capabilities, how could you know. You havent even been to space and you make this HUGE claim. What steps or study do you do to prove that it was a god who did it? Do you see where Im getting at? We can pretend that we know everything but in reality, we are just in our comfortable seats at home making guesses, you and I. Dont get me wrong. Im not claiming that god had a creator. I dont even believe in a god. I said that statement based on what religious people say. Again, they believe that HUMANS are just TOO COMPLEX, and they concluded that there had to be a creator. They even use the word "IMPOSSIBLE" for humans to exist on their own. But if we are talking about god, suddenly its possible. A SUPER POWERFUL OMNISCIENT GOD with SUPER POWERS who is a BILLION times MORE COMPLEX than humans can exist on his own. Really? Please Dont pretend that what im saying is an unreasonable statement to make because it is very reasonable.
And as Ray Comfort likes to ask people, (approximately) "Which evolved first? The eyes or the brain?" In other words, the micro changes we see within kinds (e.g., leaf shapes, fruit color, leaf color) aren't big enough to create whole new body parts or systems like a respiratory system nor quickly enough for a new creature with a new feature let alone a fully functioning creature with multiple complex systems. The Bible also tells us that God created male and female in the beginning. And that's the only way it could have happened because two new kinds of the same type and of opposite genders (with male and female complementary reproductive systems) could never have evolved simultaneously. Evolution is a VERY SLOW process, they say (and we sort of witness through tiny changes that never change kinds).
No truths were actually reveled here, except for a fantastic biology lesson. Calvin has no idea how the universe was created. His faith forces him to insist upon a god rather than accept the fact that he doesn't know how life started. Everything he said is his opinion. The wisest man is the first to admit that he doesn't know the answer.
Love this. It has logic holes but it is way ahead of most thinkers. First question to ask an evolutionist: Please show us a simple life form.... Give them a month to come to terms with their complete failure to find a truly simple life form. Then tell them that if they want to be scientific they have to give up evolution and find something else (and stop pushing that evolutionist rubbish on the kids). Thank you Calvin Smith.
Thank you for this. Such perspectives and scientific findings are so fascinating. The human being optimally healthy on a hypercarnivorous diet in my mind significantly indicates evolution to one extent or another. We are meant to eat meat and have vestigial organs and developed a complex system to digest proteins and fats and lost the ability to break down plant matter like other primates. As a Christian I believe in guided evolution. I love how we can discuss this openly and wonder about this beautiful universe.
That is a very tenuous argument - our bodies are the most adaptive of any life forms. To say human bodies are optimally healthy on a hypercarnivorous diet is purely a self-fulfilling statement and only a recent modern claim. Human brains change over time depending on a range of different stimulii - to such a great degree that atheist evolutionists use this to claim that some people are born gay or trans or whatever. However that also is a self-fulfilling statement which is untrue. We are born with a huge range of DNA which our bodies will use to adapt according to our circumstances. There have been many examples of enormous variance throughout history of fundamental changes to our systems (mental and physical) from persistent circumstance and environment (children who lived in the jungle like dogs, children brought up in cages in China, etc. etc.)
@@c0ugar43 it is not highly tenuous, not at all. Not even in the slightest, when you realise that we're not the miraculously short-term-adaptive master machines you're imagining. 13K years of agriculture has led to VERY small genetic changes and DRASTIC health degeneration. It's very clear should only you decide to look with your own eyes into the archaeology, paleoanthropology, and health sciences. And that gay claim etc. is a whole other matter... Did I say "all evolutionists have correct ideologies"? No. And about this being a modern claim?? Not really. As far back as we have written records of cross-cultural references, we have testament that the carnivore populations are always more fit, longer lived, tougher warriors, stronger, even more advanced in cases. I'm not pointing this at you, but it takes immense ignorance (perhaps not due to one's own fault) to deny these facts. But guess what? Writing is fairly modern as a whole, and the study of nutrition even more so! Do you want to find me a scientific assessment of different sciences from thousands of years ago? That would be incredible, truly.
@jamesm.9285 scientifically speaking, evolution is *impossible* from any point of view. Mathematics, chemistry, physics, biology, information science, just to name a few, all show that evolution is impossible. Not to mention that wedging evolution into the Bible would lead to creating contradictions and inconsistencies in the Word of God.
Guided evolution????? Totally impossible because each KIND has its own unique a large number of unique genes and proteins that no other kind has and which forms its own interactome that connects the network of all of its proteins together in an unchangeable unique network. Each KIND had to originate with a 100% complete unique DNA.
As an engineer and Coder I ponder more and more on God and can only surrender to reality that we are made by him.
The miracles were my tip off
I was a geology major and the Lord had different plans. I now only see the evidence for creation even with my naturalistic knowledge. It’s crazy. But it’s GOD!
Well the issue is that everyone uses the same word to describe different aspects of the word. So naturally people will get confused and agitated over it.
There is purpose and intent in our world that is evident on every scale but humans claiming that they understand it or in some how know what its intent is....
Just the height of ignorance and blasphemy. As far as creation theory that is very simple as we are currently powerful and knowledgeable enough to create life as well both silicon and carbon. And even that we are too the result of the intent of the universe mere 60 years ago AI was nothing more than a crazy sci-fi idea
yet today you can converse seek advice be driven by assisted at work and so many more real life implications where AI is functioning for years. So if we can bring from a dream to reality in 60 years. Why do you think that cells can't diversify to such extent in a few million years also a cell life time is not equal human life time either not sure where is the surprising part... And about god not being acknowledged enough.
Isn't religion the issue not god? lol
Lol, what the fuck? Let's review what's happened. After being thoroughly ridiculed and accurately dismissed as wackos and simpletons, the Christians did what every committed political group will do, which, mind you, is not to give up, but to double down and go philosophical or literal, whatever it takes, in order to save face and eke out a dignified existence. In this video, we have a case of them battling the bane of their existence: the indictment against the god of the gaps. How do Christians respond? Easy. (1) Insist the gaps are real, and (2) upon realizing that this insistence is both futile and irrelevant, insist that gaps have no bearing on their god one way or another, and (3) insert their god into an untouchable philosophical gap of all gaps. So my dear "engineer", how exactly were you swayed by the stuff of step (1)????? Was it the graphics? The citing of scientific findings? The Christians have provided nothing but age-old rebuttals against age-old indictments. Nothing's changed. You just didn't know that christians have always had a department of philosophy, which the christians are now leaning into as defense to justify their existence.
This doesn’t prove anything about evolution though
I had a cancerous brain tumor literally melt inside my head before the brain surgery, which then took 4x as long as they planned because they simply did not know what they were even looking at. The MRI showed very clearly a solid white tumor, however, when they cut me open they found something competely different from what they had planned for.
I received pre surgery counseling with the doctors and my parents, discussing my upcoming radiation schedule and also the possibility of partial paralyzation or other neurological impairments. They even counseled us for the chance that I would not make it out. Lots of things happened to encourage me during the whole process, like what seemd to be an angel in the cafeteria giving me Bible verses on little ripped pieces of paper(it was 1 Corinthians 6:19-20, that blew my mind) However, when they opened my head (with what looked like a pizza cutter with a saw blade on it) they found only an entagled lump of soft tissue. My neurologist at the time, Dr. Edward Zampella (I'll never forget him), the most renowned and successful in NJ for my kind of surgery, suggested that it was possible our prayer and annointing with oil was the catalyst. He also encouraged the prayer pre surgery, stating that the evidence suggests it is helpful. I left the hospital (Summit Overlook) 3 days later without a drop of radiation but 27 staples in my head, and I think my Dad is still paying the bill! I have told my story ever since. Thank you, Jesus
The fact that people would bash my real life story is just sad. I already have to suffer the rest of my life with headaches and a partially synthetic skull, never mind a bunch of other stuff. I've also, with God's help, overcome homelessness, drug addiction, criminal lifestyle, and child abuse as well as a 5day coma from a botched hernia operation. To now be married to an amazing godly woman and own a home. The devil tried extra hard to take me out and FAILED! It's all because God is good. Grace is abounding, and he works all things for good for those who love the Lord!
To the trolls out there, many of which are my friends irl, how depraved and angry at God can you get? It's getting you nowhere. Stop and reflect. Live your life bigger than the world, love and lift up each other, encourage good behavior and positive messages. Stop letting ideologies divide us. Instead, they should bring us together (if they prove good). Stop giving the system what it wants in having us war amongst ourselves and lift each other up. Some people who may have called themselves Christians maybe once made you feel like they were saying its Gods way or the highway. It's not like that. He wants to meet us all where we are, and those people were probably just a little confused and bugged out a bit, probably out of concern and love. Some have used the truth to promote evil, but that should come as no surprise to you, and you should still be able to discern that, regardless of belief. The prophets and teachers of this age have been misled. You may be misunderstanding vast aspects of the Bible. I've studied pretty hard for many years and am still learning, you cant just take other peoples words and understand everything in this life. But you can also just come plain and simple with no research if your heart allows you. And for you demons, just live with the mistakes you've made. And leave others alone. Your mission is futile in its current form. You are getting double and triple scammed and it's truly pathetic
@@rogerphelps9939 pretty sure he is saying it wasn't "luck"...
Its the only one God merciful..
God bless u...
I don’t see how this disproves evolution.
Hallelujah.
You omitted a wonderful thing in itself. The route they follow doesn't exist until they need it. The roadway is constructed and once it's not needed anymore, it's taken apart and stored until they need another one built. It's building blocks and recycled. This keeps the interior clear and lessens the amount of "construction material" needed. The ultimate use of space and materials.
It's like if you need to go to the store, the road doesn't exist until you need it and once you get to the store it is deconstructed and stored until you need a road to go somewhere else.
This was shown in the animation.
It was apparent that there were many more details that some had to be cut in order to limit the length of the video.
People have studied cells for years and continue to learn more.
Yes. To think that this wasn't designed, or came about by mutation and natural selection is just sheer dishonesty or cognitive dissonance in the extreme. I am astonished when I see the type of people who defend evolution.
@@rcschmidt668 That's right. And it's in all kinds of creatures, not just humans that 'impossible' things have been found.
I'm not surprised that evolutionists have avoided responding. Design is evident in all life forms. You would have to put your mind in a black box to ignore the facts. Looks like Cal was successful. There are so many molecular machines in living cells that even Richard Dawkins is confused. "We are fearfully and wonderfully made".
This is a video that shows that religious beliefs and science are NOT meant to be totally different sides of a coin. It's all in one!
The more I learn about scientific studies the more my belief/faith/trust in this great creation grows.
❤❤❤
If this isn't considered proof of creation, then I have officially lost faith in humanity.
@MastaE2288 - 1/64 of all mutations creates a new protein coding gene. Mutation is the creator
@@globalcoupledances blind
@MastaE2288 - observed! Even creationist Dr Robert Carter saw that every new generation has 100-200 mutations
@@globalcoupledances I observe too. I observe 100% human when I look in the mirror. You observe 99% chimp.
Mind boggling wonder and awe. Such intricate precision and care. Thank you for developing this doco.
We are fearfully and wonderfully made 💓
We sure are and let that person laugh all day. Want it just helps prove prophecy more and more. The scoffers will realize when they're on their knees. Bowing wagging their tongue, declaring the Lord Jesus Christ and very soon, too.
Amen! In John 14:6 Jesus says, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” The truth never changes! There will be no atheists in hell, only foolish people who will know for all eternity that they chose to reject Jesus’ free gift of salvation. There is nothing funny about an eternity without Jesus.
fearfully? is that why you believe, because you're afraid of your sky daddy? do you need that fear to have morals and be a good person? if so , you sure are not a good person !
@@cliftongaither6642 You obviously don't know the Bible. If you knew the scriptures, you don't understand what fearfully and wonderfully made meant. It means respect in a beautiful way. It doesn't mean fear meaning to be afraid of means to be in awe of to respect.
@@OurSavior-xr3yc ive read the bible a couple times and i didn't get that from it at all .
No small wonder King David said " I am fearfully and wondrously made"
To which of his 1,431 concubines did he say this before bedding her?
@@JPs-q1ohe said it to God rookie.
@@JPs-q1owhat's your point?
But he lived a very long time before even a slight grasp of genetics! I don't understand why people take quotations from a Bible written a very long time ago, that only proves what people knew then! Historically fascinating. Proof of the non-existence of evolution - not helpful at all.
@@catherinetownshend6613 I find it quite odd that people think they are smarter today, then those of the past. They have technology from the past that we have no idea how to recreate. But the craziest thing is that people want to think that all this came from nothing.
This is really fascinating stuff. The first college I went to for my associate's degree was no Christian college. But I remember being in biology class and reading about cells, DNA, RNA, proteins, etc., I was astonished at how complex our bodies are. I never once thought to myself, "Yeah, these processes could have formed by themselves." Absolutely not, this looks like intricate and intelligent design to me. What it looks like to someone else, I can't say, but as a person who is very creative, I see divine creativity.
That's all very well, but "looks like to me" is not a valid scientific argument. I don't care what people choose to believe, as long as they don't claim that science supports something when it does not
@@jockyoung4491You don't need science for everything. For example, look at a picture of a chimp. Then look at yourself in the mirror. I don't need "science" to lie to me and say we are 98% genetically built the same.
@@jockyoung4491
The problem with your stance is you are ignoring observable and testable data.
@@nathanielalderson9111
I think not. I have never seen anybody present data that could refute evolution, despite endlessly trying. Likewise there is no single piece of data that can prove evolution. Biological evolution is so widely accepted because it is the only theory that can fit ALL of the available evidence taken together. And it is both observable and testable.
Good thing that's not at all how science works.
your ability to keep things interesting never ceases to amaze me!
Excellent video! After reading some of the scoffers comments who clearly never even watched this, Sometimes it seems it would be better if comments were just turned off.
They scoff cause they can't even grasp intellectual material. Mostly college grads?
indeed...as it also applies to those who blindly praised it
In my own life, I not only saw His wonders in nature, but also in answer to my prayers. I experienced God in so many ways and no one can argue that 50 years with God is my imagination. It is the most fullfilling life anyone can live!!❤
Amen
Any Muslim or Hindu of course can say exactly the same. God or Gods are exactly as wonderful as our imaginations allow.
Which God?
Whose God is the right god...or Why uis your God the right God but Hindus are going to hell...
@@MrRandomRamblings Jesus Christ, the King of kings. My imagination is not that good. Try a relationship with Him and you will experience it for yourself. You do not have to believe me. Blessings dear friend.
Kinesin is only one molecular machine. There are others that turn oxygen and other materials into ATP, mentioned in this video. Others spin like motors that make flangellae flail around. Other replicate strands of DNA for cellular division. Those microtubules that kinesin walk on are another marvel in and of itself!
And?
"into ATP" is kinase, not kinesin
@@globalcoupledanceskinesin allows transport of molecule or protein in cells, kinases are enzymes that allow the addition of phosphate groups to molecules
@harrisonbarber5070 - Isn't adding phosphate to ADP not a kinase? Or is it ATP synthetase? Disclaimer: my knowledge of biochemistry is basic
@@globalcoupledances You don’t grasp what is being said, ATP powers the motor protein system called Kinesin which walks across a micro tubule
This is honestly one of the best videos I've ever seen showing the complexity of life. Thank you for making it!
This video is completely ridiculous. One of the worst arguments I've ever heard... seriously! And fortunately only a minority of Christians believe this creationist crap.
You should see what real science looks like. This is just sad
it's interesting that these proteins don't move by themselves but have a bias towards moving in a certain direction and they do this when they are bumped by molecules of water. That's why hydration is important in general
They go zoom zoom when you drink redbull 🤪
Those animations were intentionally created (by actual scientists) to be super-simplified. What's missing for clarity is a total jam-packed stew of proteins and enzymes and other molecules that either randomly bash about or directly interact with those relatively simple molecular machines. What's shown are far from programmed robots. Ignore the narrator, he's afraid of something he refuses to believe but more likely he suffers from a ridiculous evangelical confirmation bias.
Thank you. I didn't know that.
Interesting to know about this info
Let me ask adult theists the following: If god is an intelligent creator of the universe then he must have designed you to crap out dirty filthy stinking turds, to have stinking farts, and sometime have stinking wet farts in public. Now after you have a crap have a good look down the toilet at your excrement and think to yourself the intelligent designer designed you to do that. Now evolution doesn't have such a problem, it is simply a product of nature not a designer. Further if Jesus had healing powers why didn't the people find out where he crapped, collect his turds and use them to cure people? Holy crap they would have coined it in. Did Jesus ever say : I have a parable to tell you but I must go for a crap first? Did he fart in front of his disciples?Jesus supposedly fed the five thousand,where did the five thousand crap and pee? Did it not occur to Jesus to miraculously create toilet blocks with flush toilets, hand wash basins, electric hot air hand driers, showers, towels, soft toilet paper etc. No, You want a fairy tale Jesus who didn't crap, fart, have wet farts or go for a pee. You are all deluded!
I would love to see more videos like this. This was a fabulous production.
AiG's TH-cam has a treasure-trove of videos like this. If you want even more AiG TV has even more still and has a very inexpensive subscription price and if you choose the yearly subscription it's lower even still. Last I subscribed it was if I'm not mistaken I believe $39 for a whole year.
you should learn more and read more science not stupid religion creation stuff, that is Harry Potter style and so outdatet, god is not real and magic is not real, science is real and our knowledge is growing, the paradigma is updating every day, not religion, that was human first and worst attempt to understand reality. Science is our best tool!
@@frankytheman6665 evolutionists, so determined to deny God despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It's not a "You believe in Harry Potter style outdated nonsense" it's a heart issue on your part. You believe you know better. Sadly you don't and one day you'll figure it out. I only pray you do before it's too late.
@@DarrenCorleybuddy research Svante Paabo awarded The Nobel Peace Prize 2022 for DNA extraction from Neanderthal bones, that's NEANDERTHAL human species not us Sapiens human species. Fact check me please
I wish it stuck to the point. They didn’t really talk about evolution just how cells work
Very interesting video. My only recommendation is to turn down the background music. I suggested my wife watch it and she found it overwhelmingly loud and difficult to hear the narration. Keep up the great content.
Absolutely love your content - it's sophisticated, honest, powerful and beautifully presented. Superb information for those times when we have opportunity to speak to friends, colleagues, family, neighbours etc. about our origins and design. Thank you so much.
Appeal to popularism and appeal to authority. Both logical facilities.
And above all, it confirms your bias.
@@karlschmied6218 As does yours actually
You are so welcome! : ). Please consider becoming a channel member- we appreciate the support : )
I remember in my undergrad pre-meds so many of my atheist classmates were so snarky towards Answers in Genesis and other scientist who believe in creation. Later I noticed in med school not as many of them are left or at least they are less vocal and confident in their humanist world view. It does start to get ridiculous after a while listening to them try and 😅😊contribute all the complexity of life to chance and time.
There is no such thing as simple life. The most “primitive” life we know of is mind blowingly complex. As we learn more and more about how cells work, we keep uncovering more and more levels of complexity, and we learn more and more about how much we don’t understand. In these cool little computer graphics that we find so impressive, it shows amino acids and other cellular “raw material” just floating around. Well, nothing in the cell just floats around. Everything is controlled and transported intentionally . Our computer graphic designers are simply not talented enough to display the full detail of what we know so far of how a cell works. And we are just scratching the surface of understanding cellular biology. There is FAR more we don’t know than what we do. Gods signature is all over creation.
In my eyes, I can see how perfect Gods creation is in its design, but also that life is decaying, not improving. Our genetic code is breaking down. All of life’s genetic codes are rapidly being corrupted. Sin did this. Of course I can only see the truth because I know the Lord who created me and everything in creation. God has even blessed me with and experience where I was able to glimpse behind the veil but only for a moment. From that time forward it is apparent to me that death isn’t natural. It was never part of Gods design. Evolutionist always talk about the “endless natural cycle of life and death” well, NO! God is Life! He gives us everlasting Life! Sin is death.
No scientist has ever suggested that the complexity of life was due to chance. That would be silly. Evolution is by definition NOT random.
Amen
Wow! What incredible insight and what a beautiful and encouraging message at the end. Clearly you are well studied and gifted in your field. The more I look at life and our environment the more fascinated and in awe of GOD I become and the more zi despise satan for his lies, deceit and corruption in the world. I am looking forward to the Day Jesus smashes satan and his minions and condemns them to ever enduring fire. God be PRAISED🙏🏆🏆
@@jockyoung4491you are correct on a micro evolution level. Eg, Darwin’s finches developing different beaks on different islands with different habitats and food types over hundreds of years but evolution on a macro level as in monkeys becoming human there is absolutely no evidence neither archeologically or by fossils not to mention chromosomes. If you look at the state of humanity today in general in fact I believe we are DEvolving. Sun is the great corruptor and the more we commit it the worse it will become. Repentance is the only way.
@@jockyoung4491 That is a lie. Darwin himself suggested it with his idea of pangenes. For him, evolution had to be completely random using natural selection (survival of the fittest). He also believed that the fossil record was a challenge to his theory of Evolution (because of all the gaps in the fossil record), go figure! So you think the main founder of the theory of Evolution is silly? You are full of contradictions. The original definition of Evolution included randomness and that was held almost right through the 19th and 20th centuries.
My question then becomes, how did God create these complex structures? Did he design each nitty gritty aspect at a time? Did he sit down at a computer and write the code that drives them? Did he get it right on the first try or was it iterative? Was he working alone or with a team? My point is that this raises way more questions than it answers, and saying Goddidit is not a useful explanation.
😄 God is not a human.
He don't need to sit a put info in a memory.
@@samuelg1013 Then what is god, and what is your evidence for your explanation. How do you know that god is not human?
God does not operate within the natural boundaries of our universe. He does not even operate within the confines of time. He created time and he designed every scientific law that sustains his creation. So no, he did not sit down and write up endless blueprints of the universe before finally coming up with a good design. He is not a physical being. Our minds can only understand so much. Fully understanding the nature and being of God is not something we are capable of, given that we are natural beings and he is "supernatural". Does that make sense? Please keep asking questions though
@@forrest7050 Everything you need to know about who God is can be found in the Bible. His own book. I'm not gonna have another endless online debate about the validity of the Bible since that is undoubtedly what your next question will address but give the book of Luke a read and you can see exactly what God is like because he actually came to earth as a human for 33 years and Luke has kindly gathered the testimony of several eye-witnesses and written it down for you.
@@forrest7050
This is my answer for other guy. He asked me z same kind of question. So, u'll find z answer within
The topic at hand is the identification of a supernatural being responsible for creation. Through the act of questioning and reasoning, one endeavors to determine if there exists an entity who intentionally orchestrates events rather than things occurred by chance.
Furthermore, the aspect of culture and gods serves as a compelling reason to consider the existence of a supernatural being. Why do people all over the world across generation believe in supernatural being? Do you think all people are dumb and didn't know anything?
You may wonder, who is the true God? Why are there so many gods? For discussion let us take the Bible narrative and I will show you why it is true. There is only one God, and alongside Him, there exist demons. These demons have been revered as gods in various regions throughout history, and even today, in countries like the United States. It is quite evident that even governments themselves engage in the worship of Satan through secret societies like the Illuminati. In ancient times, kings were well aware of the existence of these supernatural entities, as they possessed knowledge of witchcraft. As a result, they would go to the extreme of sacrificing their own children. Such actions were not taken lightly; they were driven by compelling evidence. These rulers had witnessed miracles and experienced the power of witchcraft firsthand. Across the globe, people have encountered diverse forms of supernatural power, leading them to worship these entities.
In the present day, individuals seek evidence of a supernatural being through the study of creation. It is important to note that most scientists acknowledge that things do not occur randomly.
For instance, between 1990-2000 most Nobel prize winner scientists were Christians (65% of Physics, 72% from Chemistry, 62% from Physiology or Medicine)
How does one discern the true God?
The true God is the one who has created everything, existing before creation and he is separate from his creation. He is the creator of space, time, and matter, thus existing outside of these realms. This definition unequivocally reveals the nature of the Christian God.
Now, how can we be certain that the Bible is his divine word?
Numerous archaeologists have discovered evidence that aligns precisely with the accounts written in the Bible. Furthermore, the Bible contains prophecies that accurately predict future events, which have come to pass. The most profound testament and prophecy within the Bible is the arrival of God's Son, Jesus Christ, who took on human form. He fulfilled approximately 314 prophecies from the Old Testament, including His resurrection from the dead, which he did and witnessed by over 500 of his disciples who were willing to sacrifice their lives for what they had seen.
Remarkably, this book has been preserved throughout the ages, a testament to how God ensures the longevity of His message even in the present day.
You may be wondering about other religions. Well, let me tell you, the top 6 religions that you can find with a simple Google search are Christian, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, folk religion, and irreligious people.
Now, let's talk about Buddha. He was a remarkable philosopher who never claimed to be a god. Moving on to Hinduism, it emerged as a result of a collection of philosophies from various ideologies, including Theology.
And then there's Islam. This religion, which came about 600 years after Christ, is based on the beliefs of one person who claimed to have never had a direct conversation with God (according to the Qur'an). Interestingly, this individual repeatedly affirms the teachings of the Bible, despite never having performed any miracles, as stated in the Qur'an.
Christianity is centered around the belief in one God, who was worshipped by the Jewish people. According to the Bible, this God revealed Himself in the form of a person, Jesus Christ, who proved His divinity by dying and then rising from the dead.
In Hinduism, Christ is regarded as an acharya, and it is acknowledged that He is the light of the world.
Islam not only acknowledges the existence of Christ, but also affirms that He is the perfect person and the only righteous individual.
However, Christ Himself never confirmed these beliefs. Instead, He explained that He is the only way to God, demonstrating how He embodies the truth, the life, and the sole path to the Father. He solidified His authority by casting out demons, who were worshipped as gods, thereby affirming their acknowledgment of Him.
The list of examples supporting these claims could go on and on.
It is worth noting that the majority of American presidents have believed in the Bible. Additionally, many renowned scientists throughout history, including Newton, Einstein, and Galileo, have professed their belief in God. Furthermore, there are numerous contemporary scientists who share this belief.
Since being led into apologetics due to the impossibility of abiogenesis, I've seen insects as the perfect combination of mechanical, structural, material, electrical and chemical engineering. This video opens a new, nearly infinite depth, to this complexity.
Prove it's impossible. That's how HONEST people handle claims - they JUSTIFY them when challenged.
It's ok to not know or understand things. Why do apologetics go over the same BS over and over?
Dirt to Adam was abiogenesis. That is proof that it is possible. Prometheus created the first man from clay. Abiogenesis looks very common
@@bipslone8880 because I'm reality we continue to grow and advance in knowledge and understanding, but the religious community doesn't. They have no other tools, so they have no choice but to repackage and resell the old broken crap.
@@mrhyde7600
How ironic when we consider that the founders of modern science, such as Newton, Galileo and Einstein, were actually theists. Additionally, the Church was the first organization to establish a university. With these facts in mind, it seems rather bold to claim that religious people don't strive for truth.
* Even between 1990-2000 most Nobel prize winner scientists were Christians (65% of Physics, 72 from Chemistry, 62% from Physiology or Medicine)
If we consider the possibility that religion is true, it would be the ultimate truth. Therefore, it's only natural for individuals to grow and develop their understanding towards this truth through nature. I must say, it brings me great joy to see that there are thousands of literate individuals who have become theists after honestly observing the world and making scientific discoveries.
As for you let me ask you something. I'm curious, can you think of any observable examples, or perhaps even reasonable ones, where an explosion has resulted in extreme order, or at least some form of order? Is there any concrete evidence out there that shows a non-living object becoming viable, rather than simply decaying over time? I mean, if we take a look at our own planet, it seems to be the complete opposite of what the big bang theory suggests.
“The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.” Werner Heisenberg, a 1932
Ha ha ha. FFS are you 6 ?
Perhaps, in 1932, Heisenberg hadn't realised he hadn't reached the bottom of the glass?
Perhaps he also didn't watch this video
@@badpenny7820The only child in this room is you, kiddo. Did your mom lock up your legos again? 😂
@@badpenny7820 I don't think you should brush off one of the greatest minds of humanity. Just because you don't like the implications of his thinking.
Praise the Lord.
Amen.
Amen 🙏🙏🙏
Amen 🙌
Which one?
Just kidding. That's how they think, tho.
There is ONLY ONE LORD... the Lord Jesus Christ, Creator of all. And we praise & adore Him! 💕
This is incredible! Thank you so much for making this video!
@shemnetto4128 Thank you for that. Does anybody else wish to comment?
This is some of the coolest imaging that I've seen for cell biology.
I was looking for this for a long time, documentaries that can explain what kinesin were?. Thank you for your video. Continue to share the greatness of our Creator. To God be all the glory
Let me ask adult theists the following: If god is an intelligent creator of the universe then he must have designed you to crap out dirty filthy stinking turds, to have stinking farts, and sometime have stinking wet farts in public. Now after you have a crap have a good look down the toilet at your excrement and think to yourself the intelligent designer designed you to do that. Now evolution doesn't have such a problem, it is simply a product of nature not a designer. Further if Jesus had healing powers why didn't the people find out where he crapped, collect his turds and use them to cure people? Holy crap they would have coined it in. Did Jesus ever say : I have a parable to tell you but I must go for a crap first? Did he fart in front of his disciples?Jesus supposedly fed the five thousand,where did the five thousand crap and pee? Did it not occur to Jesus to miraculously create toilet blocks with flush toilets, hand wash basins, electric hot air hand driers, showers, towels, soft toilet paper etc. No, You want a fairy tale Jesus who didn't crap, fart, have wet farts or go for a pee. You are all deluded!
Proteins are formed from amino acids using enzymes (huge proteins) according to information embedded in DNA... All cellular life has information regarding protein synthesis in their DNA... DNA is formed using numerous protein enzymes working together... according to directions found and utilized by other complex proteins... So...
This just worked itself out? We haven't discussed the lipid bolster or the complex carbohydrate synthesis involved in cellular function..
What happens when there is no answer? Does that mean you can fill in your lack of understanding with a non-demonstrable god? GOD OF THE GAPS....... Yawn
@@bipslone8880
* knowing to say you shouldn't fill the gap with God simply doesn't mean we shouldn't. It's not a disprove
* We don't believe in the bible just because there is no other explanation. If you think that way, it means you don't know the bible.
@pharmagator - Proteins are *not* formed using enzymes, instead formed using ribosomes
@@samuelg1013 why do you believe in god then? What's the underlying process in your brain that makes you believe in god? And not any god, I would presume that you believe in the christian god. Why that one and not others? Its completely arbitrarial and cultural, not a fact or anything that you can proove. And that's fine, but don't conclude that who doesn't believe in god is because he/she does'nt understand the bible.
@@iCaTPSA
The topic at hand is the identification of a supernatural being responsible for creation. Through the act of questioning and reasoning, one endeavors to determine if there exists an entity who intentionally orchestrates events rather than things occurred by chance.
Furthermore, the aspect of culture and gods serves as a compelling reason to consider the existence of a supernatural being. Why do people all over the world across generation believe in supernatural being? Do you think all people are dumb and didn't know anything?
You may wonder, who is the true God? Why are there so many gods? For discussion let us take the Bible narrative and I will show you why it is true. There is only one God, and alongside Him, there exist demons. These demons have been revered as gods in various regions throughout history, and even today, in countries like the United States. It is quite evident that even governments themselves engage in the worship of Satan through secret societies like the Illuminati. In ancient times, kings were well aware of the existence of these supernatural entities, as they possessed knowledge of witchcraft. As a result, they would go to the extreme of sacrificing their own children. Such actions were not taken lightly; they were driven by compelling evidence. These rulers had witnessed miracles and experienced the power of witchcraft firsthand. Across the globe, people have encountered diverse forms of supernatural power, leading them to worship these entities.
In the present day, individuals seek evidence of a supernatural being through the study of creation. It is important to note that most scientists acknowledge that things do not occur randomly.
For instance, between 1990-2000 most Nobel prize winner scientists were Christians (65% of Physics, 72% from Chemistry, 62% from Physiology or Medicine)
How does one discern the true God?
The true God is the one who has created everything, existing before creation and he is separate from his creation. He is the creator of space, time, and matter, thus existing outside of these realms. This definition unequivocally reveals the nature of the Christian God.
Now, how can we be certain that the Bible is his divine word?
Numerous archaeologists have discovered evidence that aligns precisely with the accounts written in the Bible. Furthermore, the Bible contains prophecies that accurately predict future events, which have come to pass. The most profound testament and prophecy within the Bible is the arrival of God's Son, Jesus Christ, who took on human form. He fulfilled approximately 314 prophecies from the Old Testament, including His resurrection from the dead, which he did and witnessed by over 500 of his disciples who were willing to sacrifice their lives for what they had seen.
Remarkably, this book has been preserved throughout the ages, a testament to how God ensures the longevity of His message even in the present day.
You may be wondering about other religions. Well, let me tell you, the top 6 religions that you can find with a simple Google search are Christian, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, folk religion, and irreligious people.
Now, let's talk about Buddha. He was a remarkable philosopher who never claimed to be a god. Moving on to Hinduism, it emerged as a result of a collection of philosophies from various ideologies, including Theology.
And then there's Islam. This religion, which came about 600 years after Christ, is based on the beliefs of one person who claimed to have never had a direct conversation with God (according to the Qur'an). Interestingly, this individual repeatedly affirms the teachings of the Bible, despite never having performed any miracles, as stated in the Qur'an.
Christianity is centered around the belief in one God, who was worshipped by the Jewish people. According to the Bible, this God revealed Himself in the form of a person, Jesus Christ, who proved His divinity by dying and then rising from the dead.
In Hinduism, Christ is regarded as an acharya, and it is acknowledged that He is the light of the world.
Islam not only acknowledges the existence of Christ, but also affirms that He is the perfect person and the only righteous individual.
However, Christ Himself never confirmed these beliefs. Instead, He explained that He is the only way to God, demonstrating how He embodies the truth, the life, and the sole path to the Father. He solidified His authority by casting out demons, who were worshipped as gods, thereby affirming their acknowledgment of Him.
The list of examples supporting these claims could go on and on.
It is worth noting that the majority of American presidents have believed in the Bible. Additionally, many renowned scientists throughout history, including Newton, Einstein, and Galileo, have professed their belief in God. Furthermore, there are numerous contemporary scientists who share this belief.
“There is nothing new under the sun” has a greater meaning to me now
Ecclesiastes 1
There are new bacteria and viruses under the sun ever hour. They evolve quickly because they reproduce quickly.
Indeed. Human stupidity to keep believing creationist crap didn't change among Americans.
yet if you truly opened your eyes to now, there are always things new under the sun.
@@Gamer7z7 Yeap nothing new. Religious fanatics denying truth. Seriously if you watch other of his videos, this guy is clearly a Bible fanatic. Probably hurting more Christians than anything else.
Epic video, great analogies and I find you way of speaking inspirational and nice to listen to.
I love our God the more I know about his "art." What a Creator!
Bullshit
About 15 minutes in there you have one of the best answers I've ever heard🙏🏻🙏🏻
Except they don't. I'm sorry that evolution confuses you and perhaps get you but evolution remains a fact in creation remains BS and nothing more
How does any one even know , be serious. We as a species know jack .
This is so well explained.
Alright!!! I've been looking for this information for so long, I read an article (by Answers in Genesis, no less!) years ago about kinesin and their complexity, but I couldn't find it. I tried bringing it up to an atheist acquaintance, but I couldn't remember what they were called and he just shrugged it off.
I literally just prayed that I would find this info for the next time I see him, and here it is!
Our Creator is amazing.
YT keeps deleting the link. In my About, first video, is the original referenced here by AIG.
@@voiceofreason162
When we read answers in Genesis website it’s nothing but misinformation.
You’ll find no real answers from these clowns.
You read an article by AiG and think that’s the smoking gun?
And the voice for stupid thinks there’s a conspiracy?
@@Bomtombadi1I posted a microbiology vid 3x and 3x that was deleted. I've had over 3,000 posts deleted. Some key words trigger them for me and I've had to get smarter than the algorithm. My background is computer science, biology, genetics and forensics. It got deleted because it's a science link. Happens all the time. That's not a conspiracy theory, that's a tragedy of information locking by YT.
There are several good scientific papers on the evolution of kinesins.
Praise and Glory to the Almighty God Jehovah, and his Son, Jesus Christ our Redeemer! 🙏❤🙏❤🙏
Amen, God is the Almighty. He is the only one worshipped in heaven. (See Revelation 4&5) Though Christ our Redeemer was present, only the one on the throne "who lives forever and ever" was worshipped.
Like the frog in the pot of water that is slowly heated until it is too late for the frog, the belief that Hod and Jesus were one began yo be taught around the beginning of the 4th century. Then later in the century it went from worshipping a "binity" (2) to a trinity (3). Previous to the mid yo late 4th century, the Holy Spirit wasn't considered God.
This is all in Scripture. We have been slowly lead to believing that there a three-in-one hod, when no where the Bible is this taught.
Repeatedly Paul states "God and the Lord Jesus Christ," or a similar reference, showing the two as distinct individuals.
In the KJV, 1 John 3:16 states: Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren."
The wird God isn't in the oldest manuscripts. It was added. Looking at the context of the chapter, it is talking about Jesus, not God. Slowly, like the water, Scripture is changed until we'remisled by the enemy.
This verse, 1 John 5:7-8, was not originally found in the Codex except in margin by a different handwriting. "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one". This isn't found in any manuscript before the 15th century. But at some point around this time period, it began showing up as a verse in Scripture. Again, slight changes that aren't corrected lead to a perception that is far off base, missing the mark of truth.
Pray, study, and ask for wisdom.
2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
O Lord, my God,
When I, in awesome wonder, consider all the works Thy hands have made,
I see the stars, I hear the rolling thunder,
Thy power throughout the universe displayed,
Then sings my soul, my Savior God, to Thee,
How great Thou art! How great Thou art!
Oh GAD...you trot out that sappy hymn to make your point?
Please tell us about the Tapeworm and what a wonderful design that is to eat their host from the inside until they die?
Allah Teâlâ yoxdan var edendir
@@salehshukurov2991 Omg the more and more I scroll down the more it's religious fanatics
@@Peekaboo-Kitty They will not answer because religious fanatics only do Cherry Peaking.
Habakkuk 2.14
For the earth will be filled
With the knowledge of the glory of the Lord,
As the waters cover the sea.
Thanks for your video. It's amazing how such complex life has evolved in 4.3 billion years.
Evolved?!
The Laws of Thermodynamics pretty much put the kibosh on the whole "evolutionary" fairytale.
Any scientist worth his salt knows that only intelligence can create data.
Data simply and intrinsically CANNOT originate from any fantastical primordial soup.
😂
@redleaf2383 why can't such complexity be designed by God and used in the process of evolution
@@redleaf2383 You don't even know what the Laws of Thermodynamics are, and no, they do not put the kibosh on evolution.
@@redleaf2383what?
@@redleaf2383then how did god come into existence? You claim god must have created this world and humans because we are so complex, but god is a million times more complex, so how does he exist without a creator?
What is man, that you are mindful of him? The son of man that you visit him?
In otherwords, we were on God's mind to the degree that he booked a trip to visit us.❤ 🤯
On the galactic level, to the molecular level, the more we find out, the less we know. Gaining human knowledge is like the Mandelbrot set. It is never ending.
1:46: 🤖 Robots inside cells? The incredible motor protein kinesin operates like tiny biological robots.
4:17: 🧬 Kinesin proteins are miniature motor proteins inside living things that transport cargo within cells and operate at a complex level of micro-biotechnology.
9:34: 🔧 The complexity of cellular processes, such as the assembly and delivery of a needed part, is impressive and requires sophisticated systems and intelligence.
10:44: 💡 Kinesin proteins are incredibly efficient, powerful, and fast, with the ability to navigate around obstructions and coordinate their efforts. They play a crucial role in cell division and neurotransmitter transportation.
14:04: 🔬 Cells, specifically kinesin, exhibit remarkable efficiency and complex functions that surpass modern nanotechnology, suggesting a creator.
17:31: 🧬 The existence of complex features like kinesin challenges the idea of evolution and supports the biblical account of creation.
21:01: 🤔 The author argues that the complexity of technology and living organisms points to the existence of a Creator God.
Recap by Tammy AI
@guitarszen it said requires intelligence, so you probably won't get it
The evidence is in the complex design. Our experience says anything that requires specific information comes from an intelligent source.
@sarahhales8728 This is because you're only examining things which you know are explicitly designed.
You're arguing that everything that we know is designed, which consequently appears designed, means EVERYTHING that appears designed is designed.
This is like saying that every snake we have ever seen slithers, therefore confirming that everything that slithers is a snake, which is false.
Do you see your error?
Interesting comment, I will look at that more closely and comment later...
@@LordMathious this is not an error. It's science. All observable evidence supports it. You are promoting a religion.
So awesome and amazing❤ Our LORD is indescribable!
Google "recurrent laryngeal nerve".. The human body is so riddled with imperfection.. it is a joke to claim it was built by a perfect God who loves it
Absolutely amazing, beautiful and educational! No way did this just “happen”. ✝️😎
But that is exactly what you are saying when you claim that God created the world even though you can't understand how. But it must have "happened" because the world exists. The difference is that the science of evolution actually does show how it happens.
Science agrees. In no way did anything in the universe just get ''poofed into existence by an incantation spell''. At least there's zero evidence to suggest that.
@@jockyoung4491 why do i have to understand “how?” And my God actually gave me (you I’m not so sure about) a brain to think, reason and yes even Question him, and the word of God. “Come let us reason together” it says. And if you think I’m some ignorant fop that never questions the existence of God you’d be dead wrong. If you believe this all just happened then you’re exercising more Faith than i have 😂
Your “god” is a dead, hopeless ideology, that promotes intolerance and bigotry.
@@jockyoung4491 evolution is not science… science must be observable and provable of which it is neither. That’s why it’s a “ theory”. If it was probable as you say, then why haven’t they found the “missing” link ? You’re statement that it shows how it happened is false… it’s one man who hated God after his child died and decided to spend his life disproving God. You’re more ignorant than I am. 😂
@@jockyoung4491we have never observed macroevolution, it is pure human imagination. Also, there are numerous ways to prove it wrong.
Please bring more of such videos. Thank you so much Answers in Genesis. ❤
This is so beautiful! Thank you.
It is impossible for the molecular interacting and inter working complexities and coordination of even the simplest cell to have developed incrementally. Without all working together the cell would die.
Prove it, oh you can't, never mind then.
@@colinjava8447 can you prove hes wrong
@@johnmeredith6890 Nope, but I'm not making a claim here, he is, so has the burden of proof.
I've studied biology in high school. I've studies Anatomy and Physiology in college. No matter how I try, I can't reconcile life from non-life; even when I consider environmental conditions that may be involved. I can't even describe the process of protein synthesis.
Nobody knows how it happened, but that doesn't mean it couldn't, and scientists are trying to find out all the time. But regardless of how life begain, we know that it then evolved.
@@jockyoung4491 We don't "know" that. It is assumed. To go from even a simple protocell to a cell as we know it in all lifeforms would be like comparing a wheel to a bus.
The unit of evolution is the cell. Yet the cell exhibits all the hallmarks of exquisite design. Kinesin, marvelous as it is, is just one protein among hundreds or thousands that must have been present in the hypothetical "last universal common ancestor."
Design is just a much better explanation, even if it deflates the egos and funding of certain scientists and branches of science.
@@onedirection2301
Of course it is assumed. Everything about abiogenesis is assumed. We don't know how it happened so people are free to believe whatever they want to. I'm usually content with "I don't know". But abiogenesis is an independent question.. However life got started, we can all agree that it DID get started. And then it evolved. THAT we do know for sure.
Excellent video. First rate graphics and animations, and Calvin is a fine narrator - he has natural modulation in his voice that make the information presented interesting and easy to follow.
Pity he's such a compulsive liar.
All that stuff has no bearing on whether it is correct.
@@paulspence7600 If you aren't ignorant of science you'd already know evolution is in the dumps and the weakest the theory has ever been. Biologists have flat out been trying to replace it for awhile. It doesn't work. Whether this video conveyed it or not no clue I just started it.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Well, I do have a doctorate in virology and have been an active researcher in several fields of biological science for about 30 years. I can tell you for a fact that evolutionary theory is fine and healthy and I don't know any scientist who disputes that. As for working, there have been many books written about its ability to predict (which is necessary for a scientific theory). I guess you are the scientifically ignorant one.
@@paulspence7600 Maybe 1980 you kept up with the state of evolution in academia but clearly no more given how ignorant your position is. It doesn't work, it has countless foundational critical issues, and biologists have been trying to wholly replace the model for awhile now. There was a big conference on it back in 2016. I'll help you out further.
Renowned biologist Denis Noble has given the explicit statement and given evidence for it "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate. Why because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like epigenetic complexity."
Genomes don't improve over time they degrade. Virus data like John Sanford on H1N1 the spanish flu shows this. Human genome from encode has shown every generation humans have 100 mutations. The only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller said just 1 mutation per generation in humans means there is no evolution explanation humanity is progressing in the opposite direction 1 per generation is deadly, yet we find out the number is 100. The human genome is degrading not progressing to a better state. This shouldn't be a shock, as information theory states information degrades, and information is the basis of life.
All the beneficial mutations in biology like the famous citrate metabolism in ecoli or antibiotic resistance are not from gain or improvement in genetic information, but reductive evolution. A degrading or loss of information crippling a function in the organism that produces a beneficial effect while still being a loss of genetic function. As the famous Lenski experiment showed.
There is no evolutionary pressure to create building blocks of mechanisms that don't yet exist. Evolution does not have foresight.
Mindless matter and mutation can't manifest code. That's rationality from irrationality. That's a reality breaking concept. If you can get such a deus ex machina mechanism that does that it invalidates all human achievement and personhood because then the universe did it all. This is why the multiverse theory is so absurd. This is why all of naturalism is absurd because it's predicated on such a deus ex machina mechanism that does not exist.
Darwin's Origin never explains the origin of species -- and this is stated by David Berlinski no less.
How does chance determine when to stop at the "desired" outcome? The concept of evolution is nonsense.
It's not even falsifiable(all results explainable and not reproducible) so really shouldn't even be called a scientific theory. It fits the criteria for being defined as mythology ironically.
Could also point out y chromosome adam and mitochondrial eve data shows humans had two ancestors and did not evolve. Shocker the dating is roughly 6000-7500 years just like the biblical genealogy dating going back to Eden, and the dating is quite accurate in a general sense as it's just averaging mutations per generation then counting back to when they stop appearing.
The list goes on and on and on. We could go into the Cambrian explosion evidence of countless biological structures such as virtually every eye design and body plan allowed by physics showing up in a geological instant no evolution, we could show random number generator studies for probability of words/language manifesting, or a study on evolutionary probability of extinction of over 5000 mammal species related to size increases showing mammals can't evolutionary evolve over 3kg. Darwinian evolution is a mythology of magic(rationality from irrationality), it's pseudo science and also invokes time of the gaps and god of the gaps along with all the other issues no less.
I am an evolutionist while maintaining a belief that extends beyond atheism. The magnificence of the universe is truly awe-inspiring, surpassing the limited capacity of our minds to comprehend.
Often theistic folks think that science is inherently atheistic. However, science is a systematic study of the world through observation, experimentation, and the development of testable theories. Through scientific studies, we have gained a comprehensive understanding of evolution-how it has occurred, is occurring, and will continue to occur.
It would be unwise to confine our thoughts within rigid boundaries and cling to pre-established beliefs. Scientists are not opposed to religion; in fact, great scientists are open-minded, philosophical thinking, and have ability to appreciate diverse perspectives.
While Kinesin is indeed fascinating, there exist countless other intricate systems , harmoniously interplaying the building blocks of the universe. A symphony we humans can't begin to comprehend.
Happy to have a healthy conversation in the thread.
@@luis-sophus-8227I imagine that deism is a comfy resting spot on the journey to atheism.
Since the Creator exists outside of the Universe, there is no time and space, no past, present or future. The Bible was written for the Hebrews in terms they could understand. Why would God need to “rest” on the seventh day? There ARE no days in God’s existence, no time or space because the Creator was outside of the universe when it was created with all the laws of gravity, physics and so on that make it run in an orderly fashion. So eternity is basically a state of non time: no past, no present, no future. The “days” in the Bible were a way of relating to a very uneducated, superstitious people how they could relate to how the world came into existence. If someone came along now and told this story, does anyone think anybody would take them seriously?
There's proof against evolution
@@kell9574 Waiting requires the existence of time. Did you not understand what I wrote?
@@kerrythomas6220 Hello, that's a good question but you would need to read in context. You see the Bible already states he created time before he even rested which is why he stated in the beginning take into account this is not God's beginning but the beginning of Creation "In the beginning (time) God created the heaven (space) and the earth (matter)." Taking this passage into account God created time first which is why he does mention rest, now you may ask but if God is outside how could he rest you have to also take into account that God can enter time one example of this is Jesus even do God can be outside he can also be inside by his own will.
Hope this clears things out a bit more, God bless good sir!
The title saved me a lot of time.
I have nothing to gain from listening to people who use the word "evolutionist".
Thanks for commenting evolutionist...
@@calvinsmith7575 Let's eat kids. Let's eat, kids. Comma's are important. But thanks for confirming you ignorance all while trying to be condescending.
@@nathancook2852 Comma's are important? So are apostrophes. What about "confirming you ignorance?" Missing a character is not a sin. Failing to develop one IS. Apparently some people really do live in glass houses. lol
Excellent deflection away from the arguments made by the video. No one noticed it at all.
ALL glory to GOD ! I am close to tears seeing how incredible our God is . Hallelujah!
I just don’t understand how anyone could believe that life “just happened”.
Read more!
My own reconstruction: a micelle containing rRNA, all 61 tRNA, two mRNAs coding for reverse transcriptase and DNA polymerase and all 20 amino acids. Result is a cell with DNA. Possible it can multiply
And i just don't understand how people can just believe inconsistent stories taken from multiple sources.
@@Peter_Trevor
Read what- which evolutionary theory explains the origin of life?
@@globalcoupledances Who created rRNA and gave it meaning?
Amazingly well done, apparently true, and easy to understand! I could watch this sort of content for hours on end! This is just wonderful, I appreciate you so very much!
The video is not intellectually honest, misrepresents the scientific consensus, shows a clear lack of understanding of the theory of evolution, and argues from personal incredulity.
That's the summary at least.
@@Yamyatosregarding "Scientific Consensus", Science is not based on concensus. That said, if you find errors in what he is saying, I would love to hear the specific error you believe was stated, and what the evidence is for it being wrong. Those are great discussions to have. Just throwing out statements like they show "a clear lack of understanding of the theory of evolution" whith out bothering to give examples is not helpful.
@@modernarcheology2868 Science is not about voting what you want to be true, no. However, there is an intellectual discussion going on, where scientists do research based on previous publications, to correct and/or improve them, and thus generally advance the understanding of the scientific community. The "scientific consensus" is a description of the knowledge agreed upon by the supermajority of scientists. Dont take it too literally. It basically means "our current scientific knowledge". Yet, even honest scientists wont always agree on some small details that are currently being researched, and there will always be some people who got their degree by normal means, to then use it and represent opinions they cant support. Ironically this is decently often done by creationists. They usually dont even write publications. If they do they are useless (measured in citations) to the discussion, and if they represent the opinion they hold openly about the topic in their publications these papers wouldnt even make it through peer review, since they are demonstrably wrong - or if they are lucky they get reviewed by another creationists.
That's why the "scientific consensus" is indeed important. It is the only thing a layman of any given topic can rely on to tell apart the opinions from the science.
If you want my response on the things wrong with this video, i wrote one as a standalone comment. You should find it if you scroll down a bit. This was one of those days where i felt like debunking some bullshit, but quite frankly there isnt even an argument being made here. It's literally all personal incredility, mixed with a couple arguments from ignorance.
@@Yamyatos
Completely disagree with you and you offer nothing to rebut or refute what was explained in this video.
It completely defies ration and logic to believe or think that lifeforms randomly developed from base matter and elements into such complex organisms. Also having a lifeforce that no one can explain or duplicate. Evolution says no reason to the start of "life" to happen, no sentient factors, or impetus.
@@BuckJackson-kc8pb Did you read my comment? I guess ill just quote myself to answer your first sentence..:
"If you want my response on the things wrong with this video, i wrote one as a standalone comment. You should find it if you scroll down a bit. This was one of those days where i felt like debunking some bullshit, but quite frankly there isnt even an argument being made here. It's literally all personal incredility, mixed with a couple arguments from ignorance."
The above video is directed at people who simply seek to reinforce their already existing bias.
*You* the other hand argue about yet another topic. The theory of evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life. Evolution explains speciation, ie diversity of life. It makes no statement about or presupposed any specific origin of life, whatsoever. Abiogenesis is our current attempt at explaining the origin of life, and unlike evolution, it is not a scientific theory, but a hypothesis. These are two entirely separate topics. If you have an issue with evolution, i would start by arguing against .. evolution.
Yet even on abiogenesis, the only argument you brought forth is personal incredulity. Just because you cannot comprehend how something could be true, doesnt make it false.
Also what on earth is a "lifeforce"?
Thank you for doing this. AMEN
When I studied Physiology and Anatomy I would be absolutely stunned at how our bodies work down to the tiniest signals and molecules, and I knew right then that only God has made us in his infinite wisdom and detail.
No. It's a result of evolution.
@paulspence7600 zyes evolution of many species does play a very slow part in it all, but we are definately created with huge genetic upgrades at least every 1000 yrs or so. By someone, and the incredible workmanship of a human body did not form by chance!
@@Aangel452 There is absolutely no data to support that assertion.
I second that. Pretty sure a thousand years ago, we were probably the same. According to the data.
@@paulspence7600there is absolutely no data to support abiogenesis either yet you scoff at intelligent design
Absolutely marvelous, thank you so much, God bless all.
Any god in particular? Zeus? Odin? Vishnu? Horus? Huitzilopochtli? The Great Pumpkin? There are so many...
There's more evidence of the Bible telling the truth and God existing than all of the names you typed there.
The reliability of the Bible being true can be proven by how much the prophecies in the Bible are accurate.
There are 2,500 prophecies in the whole Bible. 2,000 of them have already been fulfilled, leaving 500 that are still to be fulfilled.
This alone proves that the Bible can be trusted and be true.
@@mirandahotspring4019 😂😂
@@mirandahotspring4019 , There is only One God. Seek him. He says that those who truly seek him, will find him: "But if from there you seek the LORD your God, you will find him if you seek him with all your heart and with all your soul." DT 4:29. To your point about all the different gods people have described, just because someone says something is a God, doesn't make it a God. But, it is rational to state we are created and therefore seeking our creator is a worthy task. Cliff notes: start with the bible, book of Genesis, chapter 1. Absolutely incredible.
@@modernarcheology2868 Genesis is absolute nonsense! Let there be light and there was light, but the sun and stars weren't created until day 4! Did god have a flashlight sticking out his arse or something?
A day is defined as one rotation of the earth as it orbits the sun, but if the sun wasn't created until day four, how did we have day 1, 2 and 3?
God creates all the plants on day three but doesn't create the sun until day four. I guess he flunked photosynthesis while he was at god school!
Genesis is nothing but the myths of middle eastern iron age goatherders who didn't know where the sun went at nighttime!
Its not real!
Looks like a fantastic video, & am super keen to carry on watching it (I've gotten to the 4th minute). Could I kindly request that you re-produce it, & drop the music track by half? The music is usually there to support the main monologue, not equal it or overbear it. Thanks so much, look forward to watching the rest of it when it's re-mixed!! Jon
Maybe try watching on a different device. I honestly didn't even notice the music
@@horpauls good point; I was watching it on TV at the time, so will try phone or laptop.
23:20 sheer diversity and interdependence of millions of living creatures to exist is a simple and obvious reason to believe in creation not in evolution. bless you for your work that brings honor and glory to our creator.
Interesting to learn about, thank you!
"Even the foolishness of God is beyond the wisdom of man."
If the Lord God were to give us even a glimpse into what it meant when He simply said "let there be light...", It would melt our brain.
Best comment.
1 Corinthians CH 1 verse 25 and CH 2 verse14 &15 shows that he's knows much more than man and that people looking at the physical plane only can't understand much at all
Well done. Thank you all
Look all you so called TH-camrs, this is how you tell a story, to keep people interested in what message that you are trying to deliver. Not that trendy way, where you just ramble away at the speed of sound, making everyone else listening, just zone out.
I think this is more of a ‚you’ problem than you would like to have it be
2:06 When you say “everything makes itself” it makes me laugh. I hadnt thought of it like that before, as i like to say, where there is design there are rules, rules/laws require what to function? Either conscious effort on the ruled, or some sort of “police/lawyer/jury” situation to enforce them. Tell me, who enforces that a frequency of light shall be a certain color? Who enforces gravity? Who tells the copper atom to be inclined to let electrons pass through it? And if the thing itself enforces its own rules and regulations, what gives it the power to choose how it will be?
There are no words to describe God’s majesty.
Thank you! Wonderful video!!
I recently was a naturalist. I never denied God or a great creator but Ive recently had a spiritual awakening. I thought as a naturalist that I had a very open mind but have realized very recently that I was not as open minded as I thought I was.
👏💥 Mind blowing. Awesome! Thank you for this powerful video. TGBATG
I have a degree in biology with lots of chemistry. I grew up with religion, but curiosity about my life remained in my genes! Intelligence grows with Improved technology and dynamics of information reflected in the tree of life, etc., plus added info reflected in this film. The dynamics of life deserves attention as revealed here and deserves attention and views.
Slight problem there? Average IQ scores have steadily dropped C 1.3% points per decade since the mid 1970s?
@@stephenmason5682That’s the result of marxists taking over the education system and infiltrating the bureaucracies. An ignorant populace is more easily controlled.
@@stephenmason5682 yes and most of them are here in awe of the BS they're being spoon fed.
There's nothing informative about this video, especially if you're Really a biologist.
All it does is try to abuse scientific data to prove to anti scientific assumption.
Maliciously so, even.
@@stephenmason5682 Yes, and yet according to the theory of evolution, we should be getting more intelligent, not less...
But wait, it gets even better: the history of life on Earth shows not the gradual incremental evolution of Darwin, but quite the opposite, a punctuated sequence of ever more advanced life forms that spring into existence fully formed and then remain essentially unchanged with only minor variations from then on. Which just so happens to correspond to the order given in Genesis. Simply to get the sequence of events in the right order alone is extremely unlikely. How many miraculous coincidences do we need?
Miracles can not proof God by definition. Miracles can be base for faith in, not proof of.
🤣🤣🤣
Just because we can't find fossils of a specie's early development does not mean it "sprang into existence fully formed".
Almost NO individual animals ever turned into fossils. We're trying to read a book using a few fragments found in the shredder. And you're ASSUMING the content of the missing pages.
@@DavidByrden1 Young earthers make the silliest assumptions. It's so funny. I've debated many of them. They even have to make some crazy assumptions that the laws of physics were vastly different in the past (without any evidence of this) in order to argue that the universe is young. It's the only way they can attempt to argue for such a position.
No, it does not.
Where on earth did you get such BS from.
Excellent video, very well done!!
Adding time just makes it more impossible. Why do people keep saying more time should help? With biological systems, things must happen in a fraction of a second, and all the parts need to be in place. If you have one protein formed, and you wait a year for the second, by then the first one has decomposed! Unless all the proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and DNA are there simultaneously are there fully developed at the very beginning, the first cell could never survive one second! Moreover you need many copies of the same proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, etc to exist in the very first cell right from the beginning, and in the right places, fully functional and somehow knowing what they have to do, and marvel of marvels, the DNA that they tell us also appeared by chance at the same time in the same cell just HAPPENS to encode exactly those very proteins in that cell! And it must have had the ability to duplicate itself and the desire to do so for the very first cell not to just die, but to produce more cells like it. Like, really??? Do they think we are total idiots to actually believe this happened by chance???
I was fascinated by the video until he made the argument that "kinesin is mindblowing therefore the Bible is true".
Welcome to one of the many cognitive failures of theists.
You have that statement in quotes... What timestamp was that said?
Yer I don’t see the connection either 🤔
I’m agree there’s two different modes of reasoning here, and they need to be more explicit. Disproving material process doesn’t necessarily lead right to orthodox Christian belief, just that there’s a mind at the heart of reality.
@@ironwilltattooclub6116 Whose reality?
Thank you for this video! God is so awesome! There is no way this evolved from nothing that is nonsense. God created everything and in such a marvelous way! It cannot be duplicated. Praise our God! I pray this video will open evolutionist eyes to the truth
My brown eye is open, Laura!
@@Bomtombadi1 Good! You'll finally recognize the truth as you stalk AIG you'll keep learning!
@@lauracaskey2753 lol not the eye you’re thinking of.
You're right - the idea that everything evolved from nothing _is_ nonsense, and that's why evolutionists don't assert it. Yet creationists keep trying to insist that they do.
@@MrReasonabubbleI'm a creationist and I didn't realize evolutionists don't believe everything evolved out of nothing. I think we say that because of the "and where did that come from, and before that, and before that," line of questioning until we get back to the very beginning. What do you believe everything came from in the very beginning, if you don't mind my asking? I'd like to understand your perspective.
Thank you so much a God bless you for this video! It's the first one I was able to show my adult son to try to undo the damage. ❤
This video should be called, Just another useless "God of the Gaps" logical fallacy.
@@bipslone8880 The only "gap" is in your education and upbringing. You must be unstudied, and woefully undereducated. I've spent my life in studying history, philosophy, major religions, and my university education was in biology and biomedical science. I have multiple degrees, and I actually understand what I'm seeing in the cellular components. If you had any higher mathematics or real biology, or astronomy, you would be a Christian. The fool says in his heart there is no God. Fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.
@valerieprice1745 - Don't you see the evolution? Organisms without this mechanism went extinct
@@globalcoupledances You don't understand the problem. You have heard the word Evolution, and you believe it can explain things it could never be applied to. I detect in your writing the hint that English is a second language for you. It might interest you to know that Darwin and Lyell were collaborating to propose an argument to justify the extermination of "primitive " people, meaning people who are not Anglo European. Read Darwin's "Descent of Man", and you'll get the idea. You are defending the idea that certain people can be killed off without any cosmic consequences, to "save the world ", of course. You want to be careful who you believe. Some elitist oligarchs who believe in Evolution want to reduce the population of the world to only 500 million people. Coincidentally, that's about the number of Anglo European people in the world. We are all one blood, descended from Adam and Eve and Noah. There are no "primitive people ". Neo-Darwinists are really Neo-Nazis. They don't like religion, because Christians oppose their murderous plans.
The damage ?
I think you mean "education".
I believe it takes a lot more blind faith to be an atheist and believe in evolution than it does to believe an Omnipotent being created all this, gave us instructions, which we didn't follow, then came down, lived among us and rose to life after we murdered him on trumpted charges.
Or maybe most atheists are just pi$$ed off at God and feel ignoring him and leading others to ignore him is the best they can do for revenge.
I'm open to hearing any athesist's argument.
THANK YOU so much for this. I am a little apprehensive to say what I am thinking, because I have loved AIG for so very many years, and I do not want to appear to be a skeptic or even a critic. I love you all! I am grateful. Most of my grandchildren and many friends were educated with AIG Home School material.
*******
So, if you can receive this in the meekness that I hope to deliver it, I must say AIG is getting much better at producing general consumption videos. You have always had the wonder-filled truth, but have not always presented it with the caliber of skill seen here. (ouch, I’m so sorry) This is very encouraging to me, because even though I have watched many AIG videos for years, I have never been so excited to share them as now. This is WELL DONE! I’m sending it out! Thank you for the upgrade!
Sorry drhompson they stole this from a much older animation released on TH-cam years ago. This takes skill and understanding of complex processes to create; way beyond the capabilities of aig I'm sorry to say.
That means your children are educationally crippled!
@@taylorbullard2118 Thank you for sharing that. Perhaps even our mentioning and discussing this will reach the right decision makers. I know it takes hard-to-come-by money to produce high quality videos, so I harbor no ill will. AIG has been very wise in concentrating on important matters, so I mean no disparagement at all.
@guitarszen I do not think of myself as "religious," but I do believe that Jesus Christ is exactly who he said he is and will always do exactly what He said he will do. I am a very flawed follower of him. Therefore, I try to be open to legitimate criticism. A salient feature of wisdom is gratefully accepting legitimate correction. I'm not claiming to be wise, but it is an ideal. So, (A) it would be helpful if you could be specific with examples of what you, yourself, have witnessed in your own lifetime in your specific circumstance. That is, "terrible things to people (or you) that do not believe as they do." And, (B) have you also witnessed the oppostie of what you are pointing out? Thank you. I appriciate your frankness.
those poor children, which one is going to therapy first.
4:47 This is so amazing I cried.. O the wisdom and knowledge of God, who can comprehend it?
So, I'm still wrapping my head around this, the kinesin are literally walking around looking like this: >---< ?
How can a human being claim that he owns his body?
We are just a visitor in our bodies which we are not fully capable of understanding how it works!!
Brilliant! Thank you. No-Mind Process (evolution)- succinct way of exposing the Great Flaw for critical thinkers & support for those who are learning to think critically- not to mention "we have no excuse" being His handiwork, within & without.❤
I'm sorry you don't understand evolution. It's really quite amazing.
@@LordMathious Sorry but to put it nicely you haven't the vaguest clue about the state of evolutionary theory in the academic field. It doesn't work, it has countless foundational critical issues, and biologists have been trying to wholly replace the model for awhile now. There was a big conference on it back in 2016. I'll help you out further. You can believe your mythology of magic but don't pretend that pseudo science is real, thanks.
Renowned biologist Denis Noble has given the explicit statement and given evidence for it "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate. Why because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like epigenetic complexity."
Genomes don't improve over time they degrade. Virus data like John Sanford on H1N1 the spanish flu shows this. Human genome from encode has shown every generation humans have 100 mutations. The only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller said just 1 mutation per generation in humans means there is no evolution explanation humanity is progressing in the opposite direction 1 per generation is deadly, yet we find out the number is 100. The human genome is degrading not progressing to a better state. This shouldn't be a shock, as information theory states information degrades, and information is the basis of life.
All the beneficial mutations in biology like the famous citrate metabolism in ecoli or antibiotic resistance are not from gain or improvement in genetic information, but reductive evolution. A degrading or loss of information crippling a function in the organism that produces a beneficial effect while still being a loss of genetic function. As the famous Lenski experiment showed.
There is no evolutionary pressure to create building blocks of mechanisms that don't yet exist. Evolution does not have foresight.
Mindless matter and mutation can't manifest code. That's rationality from irrationality. That's a reality breaking concept. If you can get such a deus ex machina mechanism that does that it invalidates all human achievement and personhood because then the universe did it all. This is why the multiverse theory is so absurd. This is why all of naturalism is absurd because it's predicated on such a deus ex machina mechanism that does not exist.
Darwin's Origin never explains the origin of species -- and this is stated by David Berlinski no less.
How does chance determine when to stop at the "desired" outcome? The concept of evolution is nonsense.
Could also point out y chromosome adam and mitochondrial eve data shows humans had two ancestors and did not evolve. Shocker the dating is roughly 6000-7500 years just like the biblical genealogy dating going back to Eden, and the dating is quite accurate in a general sense as it's just averaging mutations per generation then counting back to when they stop appearing.
The list goes on and on and on. We could go into the Cambrian explosion, we could show random number generator studies for probability, or studies on evolutionary probability of mammals as size increases and so on. Darwinian evolution is a mythology of magic(rationality from irrationality), it's pseudo science and also invokes time of the gaps and god of the gaps along with all the other issues no less.
Thank you... Keep doing the wonderful job in these challenging days.
Why was this more illuminating than my BIOL 1500 class in college?
Cause that's school and this is science revealed.
@gregpeterson3144 Yes, that everything occurred by chance, even though it's virtually impossible, that life came from non-life and no one can prove it or reproduce it, or that the laws of physics and mathematics were a random occurrence, and that structure and order, such as DNA came from chaos and disorder - because who cares about the 2nd law of thermodynamics. 😂
Because that would require a much higher IQ than this..
Simple answers for simple people.
Probably because you didn't pay attention in class.
Because this video was specifically created to give you tidbits of complex topics, served as simple with simple answers.
It uses design features which are known to push the human mind towards an audiovisual pleasure. Does your class have music in the background and the teacher speaking from a script to fit the background music? No, for it isn't engineered like that.
Forrest Valkai is an amazing science educator who explains all of this with clarity and precision and correctness.
"Thank you for shedding light on the fascinating connection between science and the Bible. It's incredible to realize that the Bible holds the wisdom of creation, and as humans, we're only beginning to grasp the profound intricacies of nature's complex system. May this video reach skeptics and lead them towards discovering the truth. In Jesus' name, may knowledge and understanding flourish." 🙏📖🔬
Molecular biology and the Bible have nothing to do with one another.
@@azure-2837Let the Holy Spirit enlighten your mind 💫
This is very complex but just amazing. To believe this extreme complexity happened by chance requires enormous faith in the impossible.
Which is why no scientist claims that
Not only by chance. First, order had to come from an explosion. Then, life had to appear somehow as a single cell. Next, the single cell skipped the two cell and jumped into male and female, then created lungs and a nose at the same time. Impossible is an understatement.
@@MastaE2288
Nothing in that comment is scientifically accurate. All scientific claims abotu evolution have to be logical and believable, or they wouldn't be accepted. Scientists are not stupid.
No, it requires knowledge!
@@jockyoung4491 Why do you keep talking about science? I am not a scientist and don't have any test labs at home. What I do have is a brain. Now when I said there was an explosion, are you saying there wasn't an explosion? When I said it is claimed that life began as a single cell, is that wrong? Is it claimed that all life came from a single cell?
Only an author can tell you the ending from the beginning, which is exactly what father God almighty has done, giving mankind his word, the Holy Bible and our Christ Jesus. The proof is there, one must only look and acknowledge it. The "Theory" of Evolution cannot offer such proof.
_"Proof"_ you say? What is the _"proof"_ that life was conjured into existence?
BEST VIDEO OF ALL VIDEOS! God Bless!
This argument against evolution goes back to a time before Charles Darwin. It was first proposed by William Paley in 1802. It was dealt with by Richard Dawkins in his book "The Blind Watchmaker". Complexity can arise by completely natural means. Random changes pushed along by selection pressure is all that is necessary.
@peskyfervid6515 Richard Dawkins in his book "Climbing Mount Improbable" claims to explain the accumulation of "random changes" by which life 'arose'. He puts it like this: "begins in what has been called the primeval soup, a weak broth of simple organic chemicals in the sea. Nobody knows how it happened but,
somehow, without violating the laws of physics and chemistry, a molecule
arose that just happened to have the property of self-copying-a replicator." Just like that a self replicating molecule 'arose'. Simultaneously the replication mechanism described in this post had already arisen and was present with a supply of building materials and available energy to replicate this 'self-replicating molecule'. We are required to believe that all this and much more complexity happend in one jump.
@@helpmaboab7 Again, that is just the argument from personal incredulity. However, even if we accept that life began in a miraculous event. it is quite clear that once it began, it progressed by random mutation and selective pressure. Worthwhile to remember that almost all life that has existed on earth is extinct. What would be the point of that from a creative designer perspective? Would it be god failing over and over again? Remember also that for near 3 billion years life on earth consisted of microbes. Then, with some event that happens very seldom, a more complex organism emerged. Who knows what event that was. From this remove it's difficult to say. Yet there is the evidence. Microbial life existed for billions of years. Then, about 500 million years ago (or so) more complex forms emerged.
evolution is disproven by every scientific study and paper since Darwin gave his opinion of his observations. we all know there is a Creator. it's inherent.
@@mikerussell2590
Just saying doesn't make it true. In fact, all of the discoveries since the days of Darwin confirm evolution. From the studies of Mendel to the discovery of DNA in genetics. From the geology of Charles Lyell to the modern understanding of how the earth's crust works. From Isaac Newton to Einstein, to quantum physics. All of these confirm, time and again, the framework of evolution. If evolution is not happening, nothing in the natural world makes any sense. If you can't accept that, that's too bad.
@@peskyfervid6515 we don't have an accurate dating method to prove the age of this planet, it is honestly a stack of presupposition stacked on top of presuppositions... and a curricula that openly mocks and derides creationism, likening it to a chain holding humanity's progress back. The authors always speak as though they where there when it all happened. evolution operates on blind faith.
Privilege to be in your presence contemplating your wonderful works. If it has excellence and perfection it has your signature.
Jesus revised much of the Old Testament.
Connecting with nature for the truth does not give us truth.
John 7:24 KJV
"Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment".
How do we get righteous judgment?
"That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit."
Prayer
No perfection here when he states that evolution is described as fact and not the theory that it is. At best he is incompetent at worst a liar.
What just popped into my mind is that the microtubule walkway the kinesin uses has a definite *address* to which it leads that cargo carried by the kinesin. How does that address get set? What triggers the setting of that address?
Also - so far no one seems to have figured out just how all the ingredients, i.e. packages magically gets retrieved and loaded - where is it stored and how it it retrieved?
No address needed. Just transport over the microtubuli
@@globalcoupledances That's like saying just load my Amazon package in a truck on a road. It will get to my house eventually.... no need for an address.
@Vorm17 - kinesin is not a postman
Does the water in water pipes have your home address?
Calvin Smith: "evolutionists will claim that this protein is the result of chance". Yes 1/64 of all mutations creates a new protein coding gene. Kinesin is an example
This is a brilliant video, clearly illuminating the complexity of a cell. And imagine, our bodies have over 50 trillion cells!!! Amazing example of intelligent design.
A pack of lies and pseudoscience is not brilliant.
Amen…. God create everything wonderful is His works❣️
Which god? There are so many it's ridiculous. You theists can't even decide which god is the one true god. Lol pathetic
How did he do that?
@@kevinkelly2162
God spoke it into existence.
@@kevinkelly2162 If we knew that we would be gods too. We can’t know how He did it because we live within finite limits and our lives are governed by time, whereas God exists as an infinite being, outside of time altogether. How can we possibly comprehend such a thing.
@@iancanty9875 Excuses excuses. Give it up. Your god is a myth.
I love the boldness. "We challenge all ....."
It makes it sound more dramatic. They know that any real evolutionary biologist can blow them out of the water easily.
Creationists are always impressed by pageantry
@@jockyoung4491not sure about that. My latest read “Genetic entropy” seems to make a solid case against evolutionary biology, like essentially everything else I have been reading, from both sides.
@@jean-jacqueslavigne3109
Except there is a great deal of evidence for INCREASED genetic information over time. Don't get your science from Christian apologists. they obviously have an agenda.
@@Bomtombadi1
160 years and still no life from non life, think about that.
With respect, It's normal to interperate biological systems as some kind of miniature technology. We didn't really appreciate cells and their organelles until Ford developed the industrial process line. In that way, we realised that the cell actually works like a microscopic factory. So it is not necessarily proof of a creater that biological systems appear to be designed, rather we can use our own technology to understand them in an analogous way.
Please tell us about the Tapeworm and what a wonderful design that is to eat their host from the inside until they die?
Mind boggling! 🙌
Wow, it’s phenomenal envisaging these micro-processes and the programming required. I have always marvelled at the complexity and wonders of space but this blew me away even more.
“For in a fear inspiring way I am wonderfully made”
Thank you YeHoVaH and praise Yehoshua
Oh its complex, therefore god.. God is a billion times more complex, does that mean he also has a creator?
@@darrylwolfe7359 Why would God require a creator? God is independent of space time he has mastery over it as proven by the creation of this space time as the space time theorems show the universe had a finite start. That argument is only relevant in the reverse, who creator your creator the universe since you hold to the argument created needs creator, and you clearly are created. I'll be waiting for the answer.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Why would god require a creator? Thats not up to you bro. You can pretend that you know everything but at the end of the day, you are just guessing. You say that because its convenient for you. You say otherwise, youd be doubting your god in the process. Reality is, you can never prove it because you are just a simple man with simple capabilities. You obviously dont get the point im trying to make here. Religious people always say that the DNA of human is so complex that they concluded there had to be a creator. But with God, whos like a BILLION times more complex, suddenly he can exist on his own. THat doesnt make sense. Its like saying you saw a TOY HOUSE made out of legos and concluded that there had to be a builder. But then he is asked about the Eiffel tower and he says it has always been there and nobody had built it.
@@darrylwolfe7359 No no I do know. Upgrade your reading comprehension I presented the clear logic demonstrating why God does not need a creator. I'll spoon fed it to you again read closely. This is exactly the response given by Oxford Mathematician John Lennox and Astrophysicist Hugh Ross and many other academics in this exact field just fyi.
God logically doesn't need a creator. That argument redefines God, nor is it the God described in this conversation or described by cosmology. The spacetime theorems prove that the cosmic spacetime dimensions were created at the beginning of the universe. These theorems imply that the cosmic spacetime dimensions came from One who has the power to create spacetime dimensions. Clearly, that One is not subject to the spacetime dimensions he created. It's a poor argument that is redefining God to be constrained by their own space time creation which is never the claim at least the Christian one or one from a scientific perspective, so that would be a good argument against Hinduism for example. But not the Christian God, the first cause of the big bang. It's only a valid argument in reverse, who created your creator the universe and biology who created you? Since you hold to the argument of created needing a creator.
@@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep God does not need a creator. Thats just an opinion. Just because you believe, it doesnt mean it is. Does mentioning Mathematicians and Astrophysicists prove your point? Are you telling me no scientist out there will disagree with you? Are you telling me that one day god just woke up and believed he had always existed and never wondered how he got his powers?? Really?
YOu said that the cosmic spacetime dimensions came from One who has the power to create spacetime dimensions. Based on that, how do you know it was a god who did it? Maybe it was aliens who did it. With your limited knowledge and capabilities, how could you know. You havent even been to space and you make this HUGE claim. What steps or study do you do to prove that it was a god who did it? Do you see where Im getting at? We can pretend that we know everything but in reality, we are just in our comfortable seats at home making guesses, you and I.
Dont get me wrong. Im not claiming that god had a creator. I dont even believe in a god. I said that statement based on what religious people say. Again, they believe that HUMANS are just TOO COMPLEX, and they concluded that there had to be a creator. They even use the word "IMPOSSIBLE" for humans to exist on their own. But if we are talking about god, suddenly its possible. A SUPER POWERFUL OMNISCIENT GOD with SUPER POWERS who is a BILLION times MORE COMPLEX than humans can exist on his own. Really? Please Dont pretend that what im saying is an unreasonable statement to make because it is very reasonable.
And as Ray Comfort likes to ask people, (approximately) "Which evolved first? The eyes or the brain?" In other words, the micro changes we see within kinds (e.g., leaf shapes, fruit color, leaf color) aren't big enough to create whole new body parts or systems like a respiratory system nor quickly enough for a new creature with a new feature let alone a fully functioning creature with multiple complex systems. The Bible also tells us that God created male and female in the beginning. And that's the only way it could have happened because two new kinds of the same type and of opposite genders (with male and female complementary reproductive systems) could never have evolved simultaneously. Evolution is a VERY SLOW process, they say (and we sort of witness through tiny changes that never change kinds).
Beautiful Wonderful Creator Father Yah-Yeshua Thanks be to God now & Forever More 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
Thanks so much Calvin, such truths being meticulously revealed is the need of the hour. God bless
No truths were actually reveled here, except for a fantastic biology lesson. Calvin has no idea how the universe was created. His faith forces him to insist upon a god rather than accept the fact that he doesn't know how life started. Everything he said is his opinion. The wisest man is the first to admit that he doesn't know the answer.
What a wonderful video. Thank you❤
Love this. It has logic holes but it is way ahead of most thinkers.
First question to ask an evolutionist: Please show us a simple life form.... Give them a month to come to terms with their complete failure to find a truly simple life form. Then tell them that if they want to be scientific they have to give up evolution and find something else (and stop pushing that evolutionist rubbish on the kids).
Thank you Calvin Smith.
Viruses, prions, small-genome bacteria. If you have children I feel sorry for their eduction being damaged by your ignorance.
I pray daily that my faith be increased. Your videos do that. God bless your ministry.
Thank you for this. Such perspectives and scientific findings are so fascinating. The human being optimally healthy on a hypercarnivorous diet in my mind significantly indicates evolution to one extent or another. We are meant to eat meat and have vestigial organs and developed a complex system to digest proteins and fats and lost the ability to break down plant matter like other primates. As a Christian I believe in guided evolution. I love how we can discuss this openly and wonder about this beautiful universe.
That is a very tenuous argument - our bodies are the most adaptive of any life forms. To say human bodies are optimally healthy on a hypercarnivorous diet is purely a self-fulfilling statement and only a recent modern claim. Human brains change over time depending on a range of different stimulii - to such a great degree that atheist evolutionists use this to claim that some people are born gay or trans or whatever. However that also is a self-fulfilling statement which is untrue. We are born with a huge range of DNA which our bodies will use to adapt according to our circumstances. There have been many examples of enormous variance throughout history of fundamental changes to our systems (mental and physical) from persistent circumstance and environment (children who lived in the jungle like dogs, children brought up in cages in China, etc. etc.)
@@c0ugar43 it is not highly tenuous, not at all. Not even in the slightest, when you realise that we're not the miraculously short-term-adaptive master machines you're imagining. 13K years of agriculture has led to VERY small genetic changes and DRASTIC health degeneration. It's very clear should only you decide to look with your own eyes into the archaeology, paleoanthropology, and health sciences. And that gay claim etc. is a whole other matter... Did I say "all evolutionists have correct ideologies"? No. And about this being a modern claim?? Not really. As far back as we have written records of cross-cultural references, we have testament that the carnivore populations are always more fit, longer lived, tougher warriors, stronger, even more advanced in cases. I'm not pointing this at you, but it takes immense ignorance (perhaps not due to one's own fault) to deny these facts. But guess what? Writing is fairly modern as a whole, and the study of nutrition even more so! Do you want to find me a scientific assessment of different sciences from thousands of years ago? That would be incredible, truly.
@jamesm.9285 scientifically speaking, evolution is *impossible* from any point of view. Mathematics, chemistry, physics, biology, information science, just to name a few, all show that evolution is impossible.
Not to mention that wedging evolution into the Bible would lead to creating contradictions and inconsistencies in the Word of God.
Guided evolution????? Totally impossible because each KIND has its own unique a large number of unique genes and proteins that no other kind has and which forms its own interactome that connects the network of all of its proteins together in an unchangeable unique network. Each KIND had to originate with a 100% complete unique DNA.
Anyone who uses the words darwinist, evolutionist or evidences can immediately be dismissed as deluded or insane.
Finally, a normal person!
Yes those people have some serious macro-evolving to do.
Take a biology class