Taken from a 3 hour Lecture on the Socio-Political, Economic, Military and Ideological world of the Muslim world in the 1st century (AH) as part of the Umayyad Kingdom annual course. Find out more about programs via our official website. ➤ Courses & Programs www.historyun.com/ ➤ Access the full lecture series via Patreon www.patreon.com/HISTORYUN
I prefer the Maliki Madhab because of the distinction between Hadith and Sunnah. It makes more sense that the Sunnah would be a living tradition in the city of the Prophet (AS) and that it would survive for at least a few generations. We naturally learn how to practice by watching and learning from others. Not by combing through volumes of Hadith books.
@@kamlasayeen wa Aleikum Salam. Great question. As a matter of fact, there is one that the Malikiyyah holds onto very dearly, it is the following narration “Very soon, people will beat the flanks of camels in search of knowledge, and they shall find no-one more knowledgeable than the knowledgeable scholar of Madinah” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi Grade: Hhasan Saheeh Al-Tirmidhi, al-Qadi `Iyad, Dhahabi and others relate from Sufyan ibn `Uyayna, `Abd al-Razzaq, Ibn Mahdi, Ibn Ma`in, Dhu’ayb ibn `Imama, Ibn al-Madini, and others that they considered that scholar to be Malik ibn Anas. On this topic, some of the more zealous students of Imam Malik later on fabricated Hadith against Imam Shafi' forewarning of "a man whose heart is that of a devil, he will be worse than Dajjal" Ironically, Imam Shafi' was severely opposed by some of these zealous Maliki disciples and they physically assaulted him. He was himself a student and companion of Imam Maalik for 16 years in Madinah however the jealousy of his fellow peers blinded them to his brilliance. It's a long and interesting topic that we may delve into one day
@@Historyun jazakallah khairan for the clarification. That's very sad to hear about imam Al shafi. May Allah swt help us guard our nafs and protect us from being jealous of own brothers.
Love seeing young muslim start thinking about madhabism. I am Sunni because I believe companions and wives of prophet were all good people, then I am Shafii and Ashari since I was taught this way, the teachers that sorround me were and are Shafiis, and being a Shafii is just to follow the footstep of those teachers. I believe any school are equal in applying Sunna, I think you should feel free to practice any madhhabs, picking any of them is just all about pursuing baraka, what are the school you can experience the most of mercy of God for you. Just make sure you are considerate while ‘using’ madhhabs as vehicle for your endless spiritual journey. People will have different thought though.
🏴1️⃣ The Noble AHL’AL’BAYT/12 IMÂMS OF ISLÂM were persecuted by the NON-real-Arabs(Ummayads/Abbassid, najdi etc) ALSO for being PURE-ARABS/BLACKS. 🏴2️⃣ The enemies of Truth, Ahl Al Bayt and The Blacks announced: « Anyone who say that the Prophet is Black should be killed”. 🏴3️⃣ The renowned poet ibn ar-Rumi composed a famous poem - Jiymiyyah - to address the Abbasid criminal and deceiver al-Mutawakkil: 🏴4️⃣ Ibn Rumi say : « You [misrespect] The Ahl’Al Bayt ( Rass’ul’Allah and Family ) for their BLACKNESS While they are PURE ARABS OF BLACK SKIN. » 🏴5️⃣ « …However, you ( Ummayads and Abbassids ) are blue-eyed. The Romans have decorated your faces with their color." end of quote of Ibn Rûmi. 🚫 The BEDUINO-"White-BERBERIZED" (NOT ARABO-ISLÂMIC as western propaganda say) slavery have the SAME indra-hanumanist origin AS THE EUROPEAN. 🏴 Mohammad Al Naf Azzakiyah, direct descendant of The Noble Shiloh Muhammad Rassul’Allah and relative the Noble Tents of Shiloh - Twelve Stars of The Desert Woman - was knowed as «CHARCOAL» and PURE Arab/Ismaelite. ⚡️🏴 REAL ARABS / ISMAELITES ( LIKE ISRAELITES ) are ULTRA-BLACK ( MORE BLACK and BETTER ALKEBULANS than many Blacks) and NOT to be confused with BEDUINS and “White BERBERS”. 🏴1️⃣ Hadith of the BLACK sheeps ( REAL ARABS) and White Sheeps Al Mustadrik Ala AlSaheehain Chapter 4 Page 437 🏴2️⃣ On the authority of Umar Ibn Sharaheel ” The Prophet Mohammed - Sallalahu Alayhi Wa Âlihi Wa Salam - say: 🏴3️⃣ ” I perceived a vision of myself leading BLACK Sheeps then WHITE Sheeps arrived in their midst until he could not see the Black Sheeps . 🏴4️⃣ "…So Abu Bakr say: Messenger of Allah, As for THE BLACK SHEEPS ARE THE ARABS and will become Muslims in mass numbers. 🏴4️⃣ "..THE WHITE SHEEPS ARE THE NON-ARABS and will become so numerous that there will be no Arabs amongst them . 🏴5️⃣ "Then Rassul’Allah - Sallalahu Alayhi Wa Âlihi Wa Salâm say that is the way the Malayka ( "Angel") interpreted the dream.”
He SKIP THE BEST >< MOST . iMPORTANT. There were SHIAS ( PARTISANS ) of 🏴 THE FIRST IMÂM OF ISLÂM ‘ALI - Alayhi Salâm - EVEN WHEN Muhammad Rassul’Allah was physically with Muslims. IT STARTED AT The Clear Orders from Rassul’Allah at GHADÎR.
ﷲ command us to no not be divided into sects. I am just a Muslim, a mu’min, a worshipper of ﷲ. And ﷲ knows better. As salamou alaykoum wa rahmatoullah.
al-Imam al-Nasa'i, the Muhaddith, was killed in Demascus by the Nasibees, who killed him for his love and attachment to the Ahl ul-Bayt (رضي الله عنهم).
If we look at how innovations creep into people’s Deen by influence, customs, and cultural ways, the Sunnah can’t be reliable. Also, it’s as if Imaam Malik is saying the practice of the people is the Sunnah. The haddithe are reports from reliable individuals back to the Prophet peace be upon him.
The Madhab itself is derived from the Sunnah, so I don't know what you mean by saying the sunnah is greater than madhab. All the 4 madzaahibs were derived from the Sunnah of the prophet SAW, it's only interpreted differently.
Salam alykom brother abu zakaria! Masha Allah love your video's and love your soothing voice and love the oud at the beginning of some of your videos 😊
5:50 Kuffah didn’t even existed before umar ibn alkhattab ordered to build a camp there for the army , so it’s a very strategic move by Ali to movie the capital
Sunni, Shia, Kharijite, Ibadi are sects NOT madhabs. The confusion comes from the fact Persian and Turkish use madhab for sect, madhabs are purely fiqh schools
Ypu are 100000% correct. All in here Who is writting madhab etc they eather Dont speak arabic or Dont understand it like The prophet peace be upon him did. 73 sect The prophet said peace be upon him. All in hell exept one. Sunna means straight path. If you say a am sunni then you are a straght path and that is incorrect. Wake up from The 73 sects its The best time now
Informative video. However, I think it'd be worthy to make mention of the madhab of the Ahl al-Dhahir/Ahl al-Wahy as well, especially since we still exist in lands such as Egypt, Morroco, Europe, the subcontinent, and even Arabia.
Main differences between Ibadi and Sunni. 1) The Ibadi believe that we have the Qur'an Allah intended for us to have as well as the entire Qur'an. Where as the Sunni believe that in many cases there are whole chapters and verses of the Qur'an lost via mass amnesia. 2) The Sunni believe in a Prophet will come after Muhammed (saw) named Jesus (as) who will defeat some Dajjal but than Jesus (as) and his army are overcome by insects. The Ibadi believe that Muhammed (saw) actually is the last and final Prophet. That Jesus (as) was sent only to the children of Israel. He is not a universal prophet. He (Jesus) died and is not coming back. 3) The Sunni believe in the hadith of the card and that a any person who says la ilaha il law lah will eventually go to heaven regardless of their sins (murder, rape, molestation) -one does not need to repent. The Ibadi believe that any individual who does not repent of major sins is going to the hellfire. Repentance and transformation of the heart is essential for salvation. 4) The Sunni over all believe that a believing Muslim can go to hell fire (for a period of time maybe billions of years) but will eventually enter paradise. The Ibadi have searched the Qur'an have not found a single verse about believers going into the hellfire. This is a Jewish belief. 5) The Sunni have cursed some companions calling them 'dogs of the hellfire'. For example Hurqus ibn Zuhair (ra) Though this information they kept on the DL. The Ibadi have pointed out that the companions had differences among each other and calling someone a sinner or stating that such and such a companion sinned is a statement of fact not an insult. 6) The Sunni are spilt on the issue of rather or not the Qur'an is created or not. Some of them say the mushaf (the text) is and that the Qur'an is eternal in lawhul mahfuz. Many, Sunni Muslims will not point to the Qur'an and say it (the mushaf) is created. In fact ask they them to do so. Ask them if the Arabic text in the pages is created. Should be very easy to do. 7) The Ibadi believe that this issue relates to rather or not Jesus (as) is created or eternal and uncreated. “When the angels said, “O Mary, indeed Allah gives you good tidings of a word (bikalimatin)from Him, whose name will be the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary - distinguished in this world and the Hereafter and among those brought near [to Allah]. (Qur’an 3:45) Is Jesus as the word of Allah created or uncreated? Mohammed Hijab said: “And than then you have another set of sifat or attributes of Allah called Sifat Al Ikhtiyariyah or Sifāt Fi’liyyah -which are the verbal attributes.” “So some of the uh some of the examples of those is like speech Allah wills to speak he shall speak if he wills not to he will not. If Allah wills to create he will create. If he wills not to he will not.” Excellent! So if Allah (swt) wants to speak he will speak. If he wants to create he will create. Just as what he creates is not eternal neither is that which he speaks. He has the ability to do both. This is exactly the position of the Ibadi school. 8) The Sunni say that Allah has attributes that are neither identical to his essence nor other than his essence. A type of static relationship between the essence of Allah and his attributes. 9)The Ibadi do not make this distinction. Nor wrestle with this. The Ibadi position is most sound historically, and in matters of doctrine.
I get what you mean when stating the Khārijites came out of Kufa, but I believe using the term 'Khārijite' for that group is imprecise. Very informative video nonetheless
If you look at the subcategories you will find precise names and historical references for the various factions who collectively come under the umbrella of Kharijites. We get into far more detail during the full session however you can see the texts on screen towards the final minute Barakallahu Feekum
@@Historyunthank you for responding to my comment. Let me clarify: when you say the Kharijites came out of Kufa, I'm guessing you mean the group of Muslims who departed from Ali's (r) army and gathered outside of Kufa in Harura. Calling them Kharijites is imprecise.
Ya Ikhwani if there is a follow up video, kindly highlight the event of Ghadeer where the Prophet renders his last sermon and all the highlights connected to the event.
The tribe from the Sindh is called Jaat which span across northern India in current day province of Haryana and Punjab mostly and current day Pakistan.
Alhusain left Mecca because the amsar invited him to be the ruler, even the Shia narrative say that "اللهم إن متعتهم إلى حين ففرقهم فرقاً واجعلهم طرائق قددا ، و لا ترض الولاة عنهم أبدا ، فإنهم دعونا لينصرونا ، ثم عدوا علينا فقتلونا " { الإرشاد للمفيد 241 ، إعلام الورى للطبرسي 949، كشف الغمة 18:2و38 } .
This is not disputed. If you listen carefully and attentively to how the sentence was worded 11:45 "ONE of the (many) reasons why Hussain left...." Barakallahu Feekum
If we look at how innovations creep into people’s Deen by influence, customs, and cultural ways, the Sunnah can’t be reliable. Also, it’s as if Imaam Malik is saying the practice of the people is the Sunnah. The haddithe are reports from reliable individuals back to the Prophet peace be upon him.
@@Ashish447 I will give u full explanation on khilafah In term of power authority Please read it well #### According to common knowledge People who control haramain (Hejaz) have the tittle of Khalifa It mean Controling All Syarif (ruler of haramain from descendant of our holy prpphet saww) It start when al Mansour (2nd king of abbasid) apointed Syarif Hasan Al anwar ibn zayd al ablaj in hasan al mujtaba ibn ali Al murhtada ibn abi Thalib was 1st Syarif of Hejaz So when Sultan yavuz salim annex memeluk in Egypt Abbasid Dinasti who control Syarif of haramain under memeluk protection not give another chance to control it So Sultan Selim took it direct under Ottoman rules to the Syarif of hejaz (Even under Egypt vassal) Before that Abbasid have full authority for haramain under the syarif Untuk wahabi ibn saud took kontrol of hejaz And abolised the syarif And take control directly It is why Ottoman was called Kalifah (protector of haramain) #### But under quran rules Khalifah mean It representative of God and His messenger (saww) So... Not system But leader who qualified for that
Development of Madhab is a natural progression as without the development, a large and complex life of muslim in cosmopolitan setting could not be addressed. Hadith is repository where as fiqh or madhab is jnderstanding of it. To follow hadith blindly is akeen to reading without understanding and wisdom. Anybody can bd literate but not everyone can be learned. To know how to apply hadith and Sunnah can not be achieved without fiqh or madhab.
Salafism is the ideological secular opposition to Fiqh. Not sure why you call it "Madhabism". However as you well know, it was championed by the Sauds and Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab. Salafists have liked to strategically rubbish fiqh since their inception not too long ago, taking aim at Hanafi's and Ashari/Maturidi's due to the Ottomans using this fiqh for their state laws. It is pitiful that many people dont see the correlation here and the trend of Arab nationalism started by the British to achieve their own aims. They belittle Imam Abu Hanifa in their quest to justify their positions at worst and at best, try to make him out to be something he was not, again to justify their own ridiculous stances. He was a Tabi'een afterall and not a person to be taken lightly, eschewing righteousness against oppressors and championing the cause of Islam while being a genius. All Madhabs have their interprerations and it is valid to interpret from the Quran and Hadith. The Prophet Muhammad SAWS encouraged this, which is why it is done. To act like the Salafi scholars are the only valid scholars is laughable but exactly what Salafists are happy to say. In effect, Salafism is a 5th branch of fiqh with rulings from Saudi scholars within the last 100 or so years.
Barakallahu Feekum for the correction Sheikhna. Indeed, there was one degree of separation between the two men cited since Abu Hanifa's Sheikh in Kufa was Hammad who himself was a direct student of Ibrahim al-Nakha'i, according to Imam Adh-Dhababi's Siyar...
Bro you didn't mention Imam as title of Imam Abu Hanifah who was effectively the first of four agreed upon Madhahib and please mention who's fiqh was followed by the khilafah of Banu Umayyah, Abbasi khilafah, Ottoman khilafah and in Mughlia saltanat of India? By the way I doubt Imam Abu Hanifah being student of Imam Jafar Assadiq as Imam Abu Hanifah was older then Imam Jafar Assadiq and I read an incident of talk between Imam Baqir and Imam Abu Hanifah regarding Fiqh and Imam Baqir kissed Imam Abu Hanifah's forehead after getting his brilliant response... Also check Imam Bukharis teachers, some of them are students of students of Imam Abu Hanifah and both Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Malik have consensus that there is only one Rafaul Yadain in the beginning of Salaat.. and by far followers of Hanafi mazhab is greatest in number... So it is requested to give full respect to all the Imams and specifically the Imam Al Azam Rahmatullahi Alaihim Ajmaeen
Being older than someone doesn't prevent a person from taking knowledge from a younger teacher. Imam Ahmed talks of this when he and his peers joined the circles of the young Imam as-Shaafi' in Makkah. You are using your logic rather than relying on the textual evidences. It is an established and undisputable fact that both Malik and Abu Hanifa were students of the great Imam Jaa'far as-Sadiq. You appear to be championing the Hanafite school over the others whereas the entire premise of this presentation is to highlight the fact that there is greater benefit in understanding and appreciating the complexity and connections between all those schools in the first century. Sectarian divide comes about from blind following and needless argumentativeness. To each his path, no need to put one Imam down at the expense of the other (the term Imam wasn't used for other figures too, but you are only concerned about Abu Hanifa being 'respected') Let us rise above these petty and useless squabbles. Barakallahu Feekum
@@Historyun Bro you take me wrong, I didnt single out Imam Abu Hanifah, whereas whenever I wrote the name if any Imam I used this suffice with all the Imams, however I saw an intrinsic bias in your commentary against Imam Azam Abu Hanifah and in your reply you again deliberately didn't mention the due title for the imam of salaf us Saliheen - moreover Imam Jafar As Sadiq is a great scholar and Imam and we have great love for him and his family and his ancestors and his descendants may Allah increase their place in Jannah, yes this can happen this is a possibility it happens that some seniors some times study from their junior in age but I didn't have this knowledge from an authentic source and I acknowledge limitations on my part again I request you to please give due respect to elders and don't be discriminative against any of Salaf us Saliheen - I respect Imam Malik very much and never call him just by his first name may Allah guide us all Aameen
@@aqoonqaate8109 He was certainly behind some assassinations of major Sahaba, most notably Abdullah Ibn Zubayr. He made a name for himself after that and was later reported to have called a hit on Abdullah Ibn Umar and a few other major companions, so you were not mistaken in that respect. He was appointed by Abdulmalik and went on to serve during the reign of Al-Walid too Barakallahu Feekum
Sunni Muslims, Shia Muslims and whatever. it doesn't matter. the point is we have to believe in one God, and all his Angels and all Prophets and ths last day. that's it. we are believers then. then we are Muslims (Submitted to God).
@HISTORYUN, can you please give a lecture on why and how so many Ahlul Bayts became shia? What was Shia school of thought like in the earlier times and the golden age? From what you've said, some Shia imams and schools of thought seem legit.
They are legit,. All the d Four imams of Sunni schools trace back to imam Muhammad Al Baqir (as) or imam Sadiq (as) you naturally have to ask yourself why,. Then do these imams (as) have almost zero representation in the general Sunni corpus yet they claim them as Sunni Muslims,. The easy explanation was many alids were heavily persecuted,.
@@ahmedlabeeb7518 I am Shia but I am kinda politically Sunni,. Not that I co-sign any Sunni leader,. But we are all Muslims,. People who hate Shia are usually infected by modern or old repackaged hate from power structures,. If all the Shia were gone soon the majority would zero in on Maliki say cuz “they pray kinda like Shia” There is extremism in Shia too the imams (as) warned us of them and said they are worse than nasibis,. Side note ,. When new converts come to the Shia mosque (we are open to all Muslims) I usually tell them to learn the mainstream Islam first,. Then explore the Shia argument,. Cuz to be a Shia or lover of ahlul bayt (as) ,. It is required to be knowledge and seek all knowledge,. I hope this helps Read every thing you ,. Can no matter what conclusion you come to,. If you stay in that mode of learning and striving for Allah’s knowledge,. You will have a station close to the martyrs ,. Wa Salam 😎🥰😇
It is possible but very unlikely. In the balance it probabilities, it's far more reliable than a written report attributed to a handful of people And it's 1000 for a 1000, meaning 1000 people who learn or witnessed something identical from 1000 relatives and neighbours through an unbroken chain of transmission
Not to cause conflict but to state evidence backed stances, the Sunni view is that all great Imams of Ahlul Bayt did not have the views the Shias do today. They will deny this but there are plenty of evidences for the Imams having love for all sahaba especially Abu Bakr and Umar. In fact Zayd was deserted by many of his so called followers after showing unwavering support for them, to which he called them the ‘Rafidah’. That’s why traditional Sunnis love and accept them all and it’s a fact they taught the Imams. Shafi’i took from Sayyida Nafisa. Malik and Abu Hanifa took from Jafar and Abu Hanifa is famous for saying “If it wasn’t for the 2 years I spent with Jafar as Sadiq I would have perished”. Sayyidina Zayd also taught Imam Abu Hanifa and Abu Hanifa even gave financial support for Zayds uprising. Sayyidina Jafar as Sadiq’s mother was Sayyida Umm Farwā Fātimā bint Imam Qāsim bin Muhammad. His maternal grandfather was Imam Qāsim bin Muhammad bin Abū Bakr, the grandson of Sayyidina Abū Bakr as-Siddīq raziyallahu anhum. His maternal grandmother was Asmā bint Abdur-Rahmān bin Abū Bakr, also a granddaughter of Sayyidina Abū Bakr. Thus he is reported to have said that “I was born by Abu Bakr twice”, referring to his maternal grandparents who were cousins and grandchildren of Sayyidina Abu Bakr. Imam Rabbani Shaykh Ahmed Sirhindi says in his Maktūbat that this may also refer to the fact that he was born in the noble family of Abū Bakr both physically and spiritually, as he received the spiritual secret of Sayyidina Abū Bakr as-Siddīq from his grandfather Imam Qāsim bin Muhammad. (This inheritance would become the spiritual Path of the Naqshbandis)
Keep in mind Zayd RH did fight and do Khrooj against the ummayds, which many modern Sunnis would reject as fighting the ruler. So on this he would be quite different.
@@Al_Sirat_Al_Mustaqeem It’s not to do with Sunni/Shia split thought, as his own brother Sayyidina Muhammad al Baqir did not join the revolt. The fact that’s Imam Abu Hanifa gave financial support (he was very wealthy) for the revolt against tyranny/corruption is enough said. Of course Ulema will have differing opinions but without doubt all traditional Sunnis love Sayyidina Zayd bin Ali. There are many examples of Imams of Ahlul Bayt turning away from war and fitna like that of Moulay Idris of Morocco and Ahmad bin Isa al Muhajir the grandfather of the Ba Alawis of Yemen both families of which are strong Sunnis. And as for not fighting or even criticising tyranny as they are the ‘rulers’ is only a position of the Wahabi/Saudi influenced scholars due to misunderstanding of a certain hadith. The original one who stood against tyranny was Sayyidinal Hussayn, and who could ever question him (apart from Wahabis who praise Yazeed nauzubillah)
This has been discussed in the private lessons and explained in detail. Tashayyu' was more or a fringe political party in the early days and later developed into a set of theological precepts and principles that remain irreconcilable with core Sunni teachings and tenets. We cover topics in depth and with evidences on this program. Barakallahu Feekum
Muhammad s.a.w. has nothing to do with you! 6:159 Indeed, those who have divided their religion and become sects - you, [O Muhammad], are not [associated] with them in anything. Their affair is only [left] to Allah ; then He will inform them about what they used to do. 30:31 [Adhere to it], turning in repentance to Him, and fear Him and establish prayer and do not be of those who associate others with Allah. 30:32 [Or] of those who have divided their religion and become sects, every faction rejoicing in what it has.
Indeed ~ Not everything that is worshipped instead of Allaah can be considered to be taaghoot. The most correct scholarly view concerning the meaning of the word Taaghoot is that of Ibn Jareer al-Tabari, who said in his Tafseer (3/21): The correct opinion concerning Taaghoot, in my view, is that it refers to everyone who arrogates to himself a position that is befitting only for Allaah, and so is worshipped instead of Him, either by forcing others to worship him or by accepting their willing worship. The one that is thus worshipped may be a human being, or a shaytaan (devil), or an idol, or a statue, or some other being. He also said that the root of Taaghoot implies putting oneself in a higher position and overstepping the mark. The Prophets, scholars, righteous people and awliyaa’ (those who are close to Allaah) did not force people to worship them or obey them in such a thing. On the contrary, they issued the sternest warning against it. The purpose behind Allaah’s sending Messengers to mankind was to call them to believe in Allaah alone and to disbelieve in other gods besides Him. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And verily, We have sent among every Ummah (community, nation) a Messenger (proclaiming): ‘Worship Allaah (Alone), and avoid (or keep away from) Taaghoot (all false deities, etc. i.e., do not worship Taaghoot besides Allaah)…” [al-Nahl 16:36] And Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And (remember) when Allaah will say (on the Day of Resurrection): “O ‘Eesaa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)! Did you say unto men: ‘Worship me and my mother as two gods besides Allaah?’ ” He will say: “Glory be to You! It was not for me to say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, You would surely have known it. You know what is in my inner‑self though I do not know what is in Yours; truly, You, only You, are the All‑Knower of all that is hidden (and unseen). “Never did I say to them aught except what You (Allaah) did command me to say: ‘Worship Allaah, my Lord and your Lord.’ And I was a witness over them while I dwelt amongst them, but when You took me up, You were the Watcher over them; and You are a Witness to all things” [al-Maa’idah 5:116-117] If people worship Prophets or scholars instead of Allaah, we should not apply the word Taaghoot to the object of their worship. If people exaggerate about al-Shaafa’i or any other scholar (may Allaah have mercy on them), and call upon them for help instead of Allaah, or worships their graves, there is no sin on those scholars; on the contrary, the burden of sin is on the one who associates others in worship with Allaah (Shirk). The same is true in the case of the Christians who worship ‘Eesaa (Jesus - peace be upon him) alongside Allaah. ‘Eesaa (peace be upon him) will not bear any part of their burden of sin. A brief definition of Taaghoot is: whoever is worshipped instead of Allaah and accepts that. It is well known that ‘Eesaa (peace be upon him) and other Prophets, and also al-Shaafa’i and other scholars who believed in Allaah alone (Tawheed) would never accept to be worshipped instead of Allaah. On the contrary, they forbade that and preached the message of Tawheed. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And (remember) when Allaah will say (on the Day of Resurrection): “O ‘Eesaa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)! Did you say unto men: ‘Worship me and my mother as two gods besides Allaah?’ ” He will say: “Glory be to You! It was not for me to say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, You would surely have known it. You know what is in my inner self though I do not know what is in Yours; truly, You, only You, are the All Knower of all that is hidden (and unseen). “Never did I say to them aught except what You (Allaah) did command me to say: ‘Worship Allaah, my Lord and your Lord.’ And I was a witness over them while I dwelt amongst them, but when You took me up, You were the Watcher over them; and You are a Witness to all things” [al-Maa’idah 5:116-117].
@@Historyun zaidi might be their origins but they are now days Raffadi Shia that curse the sahabah and Ahlu Sunnah. There are regular zaydis in Yemen that are not like the Hothies.
@@Historyun I have lived with the Hothies in their strong hold in the North of Yemen. I have seen and experienced their ways and beliefs. I have friends from Ahlu Sunnah that were under siege by them, and were killed by the Hothies. They sometimes bury a dog up to the neck and throw rocks at it while calling it Aisha.
@@Historyun yes in Saddah. I lived there for 2 1/2 years and experienced one short war there between the government and the Hothies. They mutilated the bodies of some of the students they killed. I have prayed with regular Zaydis in Sanaa before the Hothies took over.
it is your kaffir progenitors who betrayed Hadhrat Hussein Radiallahu Anhu i.e. shia majoosi rafidhis and not Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamaah, shias are not muslims
The possibility of Imam abu hanifa to be student of imam jafar sadiq could not be correct, because imam abu hanifa rahmatullah aley lived and grew in a different city Kufa and their teachers were mainly from there. This is a great lie have been spread by 12 shis
Abu Hanifa was known to visit Imam Maalik in Madinah, this is very common knowledge. When he died, his student About Yusuf would visit Imam Maalik and he would even tease Imam Maalik about the Adhan of Madinah only having 2 Takbiraat.
When it comes to balad al Kufa Sufyan Ath Thawri رحيم الله has more rights in terms of being from the Ulemah of Kufa than Abu Hanifa. The Salaf made Jarh of Abu Hanifa when it came to the matter of Irja and choosing qiyas over the Hadith when it came to him.
However nobody today is following the Madhab of Sufyan and Abu Hanifa has influenced the greatest number of Muslims in the history of Islam (in terms of Madhahib). There was no greater scholar than Abu Hanifa coming out of Kufa. It is enough that the likes of Imam as-Shaafi' are students of his students and Imam Ahmad a student of his student of his student
@@HistoryunI see where you were going with this. But I’m pointing out when it comes to the matter of Abu Hanifa the Jarh still remains upon him between him and Sufyan likewise the jarh of other imams like Imam Al Awzai criticized him as well as Sufyan Ibn Uyanah and Imam Ash Shafii also Imam Ahmad and Ibnul Mubarak. Ahlul Sunnah affirms Abu Hanifa as a scholar but Qadhi Abu Yusuf had to correct a lot of mistakes from his Madhab due to disagreements in Hadith application and too much opinion being put over the text. Too be fair the Ahnaf of old aren’t like those today from the likes of the maturidiyah which ascribe a false aqeedah which they promote between the brelivis and deobandiyyah. Almost in comparison with the ashirah and the shafiiyah of Azhar. My main point is though that people over praise Abu Hanifa ascribing to him which is not befitting for him a lot of it is ghuluw. But they completely dismiss the Jarh and throw Sufyan being an imam from Kufa out the window or defame the likes of the madhab of Al Imam Ahmad for putting the Hadith and the Ijma of the Sahabah above qiyas.
@@Abuhafsahalsalafithat would lead to the logical conclusion that the vast majority of Muslim in history were followers of an Imam who didn't quite understand Islam properly. Not willing to accept that narrative. Abu Hanifa is one of the greatest Imams in Islam, perfection belongs only to the Anbiya and Rusul, those who criticised him also had their own critics, where do we draw the line?
@@Historyun Of course perfection belongs with Anbiya Wa Rasoul Alaihum As Salaatul Wa Salaam without a doubt. The notion that I was pointing to is the ghuluw of today’s followers of Abu Hanifa. Calling him Imam Al A’zam is going way too far in my view because of the valid Jarh that is made by the Salaf against him. As stated previously he’s still accepted as an imam but the people today may be in large number followers of the madhab of Ahnaf. But Ahlul Sunnah doesn’t use numbers as proofs that’s why the status of Imams like Imam Ahmad and Ishaq Ibn Rahwayh are noted and respected for their efforts. But in todays time people throw away the Jarh based off their emotions and go into another extreme with being oh Abu Hanifa is the only one who has a valid Madhab so they believe they can revile Imam Ash Shafii, Ahmad, Al Baani even the Sheikhayn “two sheikhs” Sheikh ul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah and Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab. Today’s Ahnaf almost raise Abu Hanifa to the status of The Prophet Alayhi Salaatul WaSalaam Wa Iyadhu Billah. Meaning the Hadith would say one thing but they take the opinion of Numan Ibn thabibt.
No sugar-coating is enough to give blind eyes to corruption !!! Birth place of blind-following & all fall form of corrupt beliefs...kufa No justification... Changing/modifying sunnah according to Akl ...
Audhubillah. The Ibadi madhhab arose out of the khawarij! They are merely a diluted version of that. Khawarij are the same people who put the Sahaba against each other and killed Uthman and Ali. The ibadis to this day disparage two of our beloved khulafa.
@@bigmanrayray. you say you love sahaba who killed other sahaba. Some of the sahaba were “khawarijj” according to your scholars, but you accept the ummayds and alids who killed each other. According to your own hadith to curse a Muslim is fisq, and to kill a Muslim is kufr.
@@bigmanrayray. you say you love sahaba who killed other sahaba. Some of the sahaba were “khawarijj” according to your scholars, but you accept the ummayds and alids who killed each other. According to your own hadith to curse a Muslim is fisq, and to kill a Muslim is kufr.
Wrong. It's the arrogance of Sunnis that is the result of all this. Every relgion have sects but they are united. Why not Islam? Because Sunnis dont want to. They hate other sects while we Shias are strong and still fighting Ezrahell.
@MustafaAli-lb8dq Wrong. Go read and understand the Quran if you can, you will then understand. You think if the Prophet (SAW) was around now, he would be congratulating the 'Mathhabs. Stick to your Shiaism, I'll stick to my Islam.
@@BigOmes1 Quran says don'take sects among yourself. But sects will still be made a cording to Hadith and only one will go to heaven. That sect is not stated. Sunni's arrogance says only they will go to heaven
Call to Islam you are 100 Right Ibadi are very carefullwhen they speak about Islam Quran and Our Prophet SAW The soccaled Sunni and Shia became more an ideology
The Shi ites believe that Ali ibnou Abu Talib was perfect but he made also mistakes in the battle of the Camel the Khawarij chose the side of Oum Aysha 3alayha salam our Prophets Beloved wife may ALLAH grand her with peace and blessing
What a nice way to divide islam like hinduism. There is no classification of islam. Black belal was muslim, white arabs were muslim. Sunni sushi shia pizza is just to distract muslim from islam.
![ILLSLICK X YOUNGOHM - We're The same [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yUJNkobYR0E/mqdefault.jpg)
Taken from a 3 hour Lecture on the Socio-Political, Economic, Military and Ideological world of the Muslim world in the 1st century (AH) as part of the Umayyad Kingdom annual course.
Find out more about programs via our official website.
➤ Courses & Programs www.historyun.com/
➤ Access the full lecture series via Patreon www.patreon.com/HISTORYUN
I prefer the Maliki Madhab because of the distinction between Hadith and Sunnah. It makes more sense that the Sunnah would be a living tradition in the city of the Prophet (AS) and that it would survive for at least a few generations. We naturally learn how to practice by watching and learning from others. Not by combing through volumes of Hadith books.
Right on 💎
A living tradition, not a literal interpretation
@@Historyun Assalamualaikum brother, isn’t there a Hadith from the Prophet SAW lauding the future scholar of Madinah?
@@kamlasayeen wa Aleikum Salam.
Great question. As a matter of fact, there is one that the Malikiyyah holds onto very dearly, it is the following narration
“Very soon, people will beat the flanks of camels in search of knowledge, and they shall find no-one more knowledgeable than the knowledgeable scholar of Madinah”
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi
Grade: Hhasan Saheeh
Al-Tirmidhi, al-Qadi `Iyad, Dhahabi and others relate from Sufyan ibn `Uyayna, `Abd al-Razzaq, Ibn Mahdi, Ibn Ma`in, Dhu’ayb ibn `Imama, Ibn al-Madini, and others that they considered that scholar to be Malik ibn Anas.
On this topic, some of the more zealous students of Imam Malik later on fabricated Hadith against Imam Shafi' forewarning of "a man whose heart is that of a devil, he will be worse than Dajjal"
Ironically, Imam Shafi' was severely opposed by some of these zealous Maliki disciples and they physically assaulted him. He was himself a student and companion of Imam Maalik for 16 years in Madinah however the jealousy of his fellow peers blinded them to his brilliance.
It's a long and interesting topic that we may delve into one day
school of shafi'i. a lil bit of everything. nothing too deep and keep it simple
@@Historyun jazakallah khairan for the clarification. That's very sad to hear about imam Al shafi. May Allah swt help us guard our nafs and protect us from being jealous of own brothers.
Need part 2 asap my Brother, Brilliant video!!
I was thinking, this is a blessing Allah has blessed us with for bringing us to this channel
Love seeing young muslim start thinking about madhabism. I am Sunni because I believe companions and wives of prophet were all good people, then I am Shafii and Ashari since I was taught this way, the teachers that sorround me were and are Shafiis, and being a Shafii is just to follow the footstep of those teachers. I believe any school are equal in applying Sunna, I think you should feel free to practice any madhhabs, picking any of them is just all about pursuing baraka, what are the school you can experience the most of mercy of God for you. Just make sure you are considerate while ‘using’ madhhabs as vehicle for your endless spiritual journey. People will have different thought though.
🏴1️⃣ The Noble AHL’AL’BAYT/12 IMÂMS OF ISLÂM were persecuted by the NON-real-Arabs(Ummayads/Abbassid, najdi etc) ALSO for being PURE-ARABS/BLACKS.
🏴2️⃣ The enemies of Truth, Ahl Al Bayt and The Blacks announced: « Anyone who say that the Prophet is Black should be killed”.
🏴3️⃣ The renowned poet ibn ar-Rumi composed a famous poem - Jiymiyyah - to address the Abbasid criminal and deceiver al-Mutawakkil:
🏴4️⃣ Ibn Rumi say : « You [misrespect] The Ahl’Al Bayt ( Rass’ul’Allah and Family ) for their BLACKNESS While they are PURE ARABS OF BLACK SKIN. »
🏴5️⃣ « …However, you ( Ummayads and Abbassids ) are blue-eyed. The Romans have decorated your faces with their color." end of quote of Ibn Rûmi.
🚫 The BEDUINO-"White-BERBERIZED" (NOT ARABO-ISLÂMIC as western propaganda say) slavery have the SAME indra-hanumanist origin AS THE EUROPEAN.
🏴 Mohammad Al Naf Azzakiyah, direct descendant of The Noble Shiloh Muhammad Rassul’Allah and relative the Noble Tents of Shiloh - Twelve Stars of The Desert Woman - was knowed as «CHARCOAL» and PURE Arab/Ismaelite.
⚡️🏴 REAL ARABS / ISMAELITES ( LIKE ISRAELITES ) are ULTRA-BLACK ( MORE BLACK and BETTER ALKEBULANS than many Blacks) and NOT to be confused with BEDUINS and “White BERBERS”.
🏴1️⃣ Hadith of the BLACK sheeps ( REAL ARABS) and White Sheeps
Al Mustadrik Ala AlSaheehain Chapter 4 Page 437
🏴2️⃣ On the authority of Umar Ibn Sharaheel ” The Prophet Mohammed - Sallalahu Alayhi Wa Âlihi Wa Salam - say:
🏴3️⃣ ” I perceived a vision of myself leading BLACK Sheeps then WHITE Sheeps arrived in their midst until he could not see the Black Sheeps .
🏴4️⃣ "…So Abu Bakr say: Messenger of Allah, As for THE BLACK SHEEPS ARE THE ARABS and will become Muslims in mass numbers.
🏴4️⃣ "..THE WHITE SHEEPS ARE THE NON-ARABS and will become so numerous that there will be no Arabs amongst them .
🏴5️⃣ "Then Rassul’Allah - Sallalahu Alayhi Wa Âlihi Wa Salâm say that is the way the Malayka ( "Angel") interpreted the dream.”
He SKIP THE BEST >< MOST . iMPORTANT. There were SHIAS ( PARTISANS ) of 🏴 THE FIRST IMÂM OF ISLÂM ‘ALI - Alayhi Salâm - EVEN WHEN Muhammad Rassul’Allah was physically with Muslims. IT STARTED AT The Clear Orders from Rassul’Allah at GHADÎR.
Incredible piece of information. May Allah reward your efforts
Ameen. Barakallahu Feekum
ﷲ command us to no not be divided into sects.
I am just a Muslim, a mu’min, a worshipper of ﷲ.
And ﷲ knows better.
As salamou alaykoum wa rahmatoullah.
Thanks
Thank you for your support, you are appreciated 💎
al-Imam al-Nasa'i, the Muhaddith, was killed in Demascus by the Nasibees, who killed him for his love and attachment to the Ahl ul-Bayt (رضي الله عنهم).
They are still amongst us today brother
@HISTORYUN Allah protect us from their harm. BTW, Very good and insightful work brother. Greatly appreciated.
@@kashmirirose3733 Barakallahu Feekum
very interesting. its even more interesting to see people living with all those ancient ideologies today.
I got at least two things out of the video:
1) succession of capitals
2) sunnah is greater than madhab
Sunnah is greater then madhab meaning daleel of greater
If we look at how innovations creep into people’s Deen by influence, customs, and cultural ways, the Sunnah can’t be reliable. Also, it’s as if Imaam Malik is saying the practice of the people is the Sunnah. The haddithe are reports from reliable individuals back to the Prophet peace be upon him.
The Madhab itself is derived from the Sunnah, so I don't know what you mean by saying the sunnah is greater than madhab. All the 4 madzaahibs were derived from the Sunnah of the prophet SAW, it's only interpreted differently.
@@bash10101 This question should be for HISTORYUN. A madhab possibly is based on things other than sunnah?
@@bash10101 madhab is man made
Salam alykom brother abu zakaria! Masha Allah love your video's and love your soothing voice and love the oud at the beginning of some of your videos 😊
Wa Aleikum Salam dear brother. Barakallahu Feekum for the wonderful words and for your support. It's very much appreciated
May we be united under the flag of Islam once again bring justice to the whole world
5:50 Kuffah didn’t even existed before umar ibn alkhattab ordered to build a camp there for the army , so it’s a very strategic move by Ali to movie the capital
Sunni, Shia, Kharijite, Ibadi are sects NOT madhabs.
The confusion comes from the fact Persian and Turkish use madhab for sect, madhabs are purely fiqh schools
Ypu are 100000% correct. All in here Who is writting madhab etc they eather Dont speak arabic or Dont understand it like The prophet peace be upon him did. 73 sect The prophet said peace be upon him. All in hell exept one. Sunna means straight path. If you say a am sunni then you are a straght path and that is incorrect. Wake up from The 73 sects its The best time now
@@TonySvennesson-bq4ehThank you! Exactly.
I love this channel ❤
The channel loves you back ♥️♥️
JazakAllah for this part of history, akhi
Barakallahu Feekum
Informative video. However, I think it'd be worthy to make mention of the madhab of the Ahl al-Dhahir/Ahl al-Wahy as well, especially since we still exist in lands such as Egypt, Morroco, Europe, the subcontinent, and even Arabia.
I ALSO ADHERE CLOSELY TO THIS SCHOOL
Main differences between Ibadi and Sunni.
1) The Ibadi believe that we have the Qur'an Allah intended for us to have as well as the entire Qur'an.
Where as the Sunni believe that in many cases there are whole chapters and verses of the Qur'an lost via mass amnesia.
2) The Sunni believe in a Prophet will come after Muhammed (saw) named Jesus (as) who will defeat some Dajjal but than Jesus (as) and his army are overcome by insects.
The Ibadi believe that Muhammed (saw) actually is the last and final Prophet. That Jesus (as) was sent only to the children of Israel. He is not a universal prophet. He (Jesus) died and is not coming back.
3) The Sunni believe in the hadith of the card and that a any person who says la ilaha il law lah will eventually go to heaven regardless of their sins (murder, rape, molestation) -one does not need to repent.
The Ibadi believe that any individual who does not repent of major sins is going to the hellfire. Repentance and transformation of the heart is essential for salvation.
4) The Sunni over all believe that a believing Muslim can go to hell fire (for a period of time maybe billions of years) but will eventually enter paradise.
The Ibadi have searched the Qur'an have not found a single verse about believers going into the hellfire. This is a Jewish belief.
5) The Sunni have cursed some companions calling them 'dogs of the hellfire'. For example Hurqus ibn Zuhair (ra) Though this information they kept on the DL.
The Ibadi have pointed out that the companions had differences among each other and calling someone a sinner or stating that such and such a companion sinned is a statement of fact not an insult.
6) The Sunni are spilt on the issue of rather or not the Qur'an is created or not. Some of them say the mushaf (the text) is and that the Qur'an is eternal in lawhul mahfuz. Many, Sunni Muslims will not point to the Qur'an and say it (the mushaf) is created. In fact ask they them to do so. Ask them if the Arabic text in the pages is created. Should be very easy to do.
7) The Ibadi believe that this issue relates to rather or not Jesus (as) is created or eternal and uncreated.
“When the angels said, “O Mary, indeed Allah gives you good tidings of a word (bikalimatin)from Him, whose name will be the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary - distinguished in this world and the Hereafter and among those brought near [to Allah]. (Qur’an 3:45)
Is Jesus as the word of Allah created or uncreated?
Mohammed Hijab said:
“And than then you have another set of sifat or attributes of Allah called Sifat Al Ikhtiyariyah or Sifāt Fi’liyyah -which are the verbal attributes.”
“So some of the uh some of the examples of those is like speech Allah wills to speak he shall speak if he wills not to he will not. If Allah wills to create he will create. If he wills not to he will not.”
Excellent! So if Allah (swt) wants to speak he will speak. If he wants to create he will create. Just as what he creates is not eternal neither is that which he speaks. He has the ability to do both. This is exactly the position of the Ibadi school.
8) The Sunni say that Allah has attributes that are neither identical to his essence nor other than his essence. A type of static relationship between the essence of Allah and his attributes.
9)The Ibadi do not make this distinction. Nor wrestle with this.
The Ibadi position is most sound historically, and in matters of doctrine.
im searching for real islam, any help would be good
I get what you mean when stating the Khārijites came out of Kufa, but I believe using the term 'Khārijite' for that group is imprecise. Very informative video nonetheless
If you look at the subcategories you will find precise names and historical references for the various factions who collectively come under the umbrella of Kharijites. We get into far more detail during the full session however you can see the texts on screen towards the final minute
Barakallahu Feekum
@@Historyunthank you for responding to my comment. Let me clarify: when you say the Kharijites came out of Kufa, I'm guessing you mean the group of Muslims who departed from Ali's (r) army and gathered outside of Kufa in Harura. Calling them Kharijites is imprecise.
Banging lecture Masha Allah.
Barakallahu Feekum
Ya Ikhwani if there is a follow up video, kindly highlight the event of Ghadeer where the Prophet renders his last sermon and all the highlights connected to the event.
Need the entire lecture.
What is the need for music?
The tribe from the Sindh is called Jaat which span across northern India in current day province of Haryana and Punjab mostly and current day Pakistan.
When was the first instance of the term rashidun used,. Classically ?,.
Brilliant
Alhusain left Mecca because the amsar invited him to be the ruler, even the Shia narrative say that
"اللهم إن متعتهم إلى حين ففرقهم فرقاً واجعلهم طرائق قددا ، و لا ترض الولاة عنهم أبدا ، فإنهم دعونا لينصرونا ، ثم عدوا علينا فقتلونا "
{ الإرشاد للمفيد 241 ، إعلام الورى للطبرسي 949، كشف الغمة 18:2و38 } .
how does this hadith prove your claim?
This is not disputed. If you listen carefully and attentively to how the sentence was worded 11:45
"ONE of the (many) reasons why Hussain left...."
Barakallahu Feekum
If we look at how innovations creep into people’s Deen by influence, customs, and cultural ways, the Sunnah can’t be reliable. Also, it’s as if Imaam Malik is saying the practice of the people is the Sunnah. The haddithe are reports from reliable individuals back to the Prophet peace be upon him.
Nice...
When u said
Umayad dinasty was form of kingdom
(Not khilafah)
even ottomans are caliphates. In Urdu we call it khilafat e uthamniya
@@TupacMakaveli1996
Do you know what term khilafah for power authority??
Mu’awiya was the first king in Islam,…
And we should all know what the prophet (saws) said about kings 😮
@@TupacMakaveli1996 the Ottomans themselves called it Devlat i Aliyye, using khilafat for anything post Rashidun is not a traditional position
@@Ashish447
I will give u full explanation on khilafah
In term of power authority
Please read it well
####
According to common knowledge
People who control haramain (Hejaz) have the tittle of Khalifa
It mean
Controling All Syarif (ruler of haramain from descendant of our holy prpphet saww)
It start when al Mansour (2nd king of abbasid) apointed Syarif Hasan Al anwar ibn zayd al ablaj in hasan al mujtaba ibn ali Al murhtada ibn abi Thalib was 1st Syarif of Hejaz
So when Sultan yavuz salim annex memeluk in Egypt
Abbasid Dinasti who control Syarif of haramain under memeluk protection not give another chance to control it
So Sultan Selim took it direct under Ottoman rules to the Syarif of hejaz
(Even under Egypt vassal)
Before that
Abbasid have full authority for haramain under the syarif
Untuk wahabi ibn saud took kontrol of hejaz
And abolised the syarif
And take control directly
It is why
Ottoman was called Kalifah (protector of haramain)
####
But under quran rules
Khalifah mean
It representative of God and His messenger (saww)
So... Not system
But leader who qualified for that
Allahhumma barik
Development of Madhab is a natural progression as without the development, a large and complex life of muslim in cosmopolitan setting could not be addressed. Hadith is repository where as fiqh or madhab is jnderstanding of it. To follow hadith blindly is akeen to reading without understanding and wisdom. Anybody can bd literate but not everyone can be learned. To know how to apply hadith and Sunnah can not be achieved without fiqh or madhab.
Salafism is the ideological secular opposition to Fiqh. Not sure why you call it "Madhabism". However as you well know, it was championed by the Sauds and Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab.
Salafists have liked to strategically rubbish fiqh since their inception not too long ago, taking aim at Hanafi's and Ashari/Maturidi's due to the Ottomans using this fiqh for their state laws. It is pitiful that many people dont see the correlation here and the trend of Arab nationalism started by the British to achieve their own aims. They belittle Imam Abu Hanifa in their quest to justify their positions at worst and at best, try to make him out to be something he was not, again to justify their own ridiculous stances. He was a Tabi'een afterall and not a person to be taken lightly, eschewing righteousness against oppressors and championing the cause of Islam while being a genius.
All Madhabs have their interprerations and it is valid to interpret from the Quran and Hadith. The Prophet Muhammad SAWS encouraged this, which is why it is done. To act like the Salafi scholars are the only valid scholars is laughable but exactly what Salafists are happy to say. In effect, Salafism is a 5th branch of fiqh with rulings from Saudi scholars within the last 100 or so years.
Uthman was murdered on 18th of dhul hijjah,… fascinating 😮🧐
There is an error in the presentation. Ibrahim Al Nakh'ī did not teach Imam Abū Hanīfah. Mā shā Allāh. Great work
Barakallahu Feekum for the correction Sheikhna.
Indeed, there was one degree of separation between the two men cited since Abu Hanifa's Sheikh in Kufa was Hammad who himself was a direct student of Ibrahim al-Nakha'i, according to Imam Adh-Dhababi's Siyar...
Who was Imam Abu Hanifah’s teacher?
@4 mins,.. thank you,.. many a person called me a liar for talking about Omar’s martial law,. And sealing off of the city,.
Bro you didn't mention Imam as title of Imam Abu Hanifah who was effectively the first of four agreed upon Madhahib and please mention who's fiqh was followed by the khilafah of Banu Umayyah, Abbasi khilafah, Ottoman khilafah and in Mughlia saltanat of India? By the way I doubt Imam Abu Hanifah being student of Imam Jafar Assadiq as Imam Abu Hanifah was older then Imam Jafar Assadiq and I read an incident of talk between Imam Baqir and Imam Abu Hanifah regarding Fiqh and Imam Baqir kissed Imam Abu Hanifah's forehead after getting his brilliant response... Also check Imam Bukharis teachers, some of them are students of students of Imam Abu Hanifah and both Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Malik have consensus that there is only one Rafaul Yadain in the beginning of Salaat.. and by far followers of Hanafi mazhab is greatest in number... So it is requested to give full respect to all the Imams and specifically the Imam Al Azam Rahmatullahi Alaihim Ajmaeen
Being older than someone doesn't prevent a person from taking knowledge from a younger teacher. Imam Ahmed talks of this when he and his peers joined the circles of the young Imam as-Shaafi' in Makkah.
You are using your logic rather than relying on the textual evidences. It is an established and undisputable fact that both Malik and Abu Hanifa were students of the great Imam Jaa'far as-Sadiq.
You appear to be championing the Hanafite school over the others whereas the entire premise of this presentation is to highlight the fact that there is greater benefit in understanding and appreciating the complexity and connections between all those schools in the first century.
Sectarian divide comes about from blind following and needless argumentativeness.
To each his path, no need to put one Imam down at the expense of the other (the term Imam wasn't used for other figures too, but you are only concerned about Abu Hanifa being 'respected')
Let us rise above these petty and useless squabbles.
Barakallahu Feekum
@@Historyun Bro you take me wrong, I didnt single out Imam Abu Hanifah, whereas whenever I wrote the name if any Imam I used this suffice with all the Imams, however I saw an intrinsic bias in your commentary against Imam Azam Abu Hanifah and in your reply you again deliberately didn't mention the due title for the imam of salaf us Saliheen -
moreover Imam Jafar As Sadiq is a great scholar and Imam and we have great love for him and his family and his ancestors and his descendants may Allah increase their place in Jannah, yes this can happen this is a possibility it happens that some seniors some times study from their junior in age but I didn't have this knowledge from an authentic source and I acknowledge limitations on my part
again I request you to please give due respect to elders and don't be discriminative against any of Salaf us Saliheen - I respect Imam Malik very much and never call him just by his first name
may Allah guide us all Aameen
@@MK-dd7lj Barakallahu Feekum
Hajaj ibn yusuf was under the rule of abdulmalik
Nothing to the contrary of this has been mentioned
@@Historyun ok i thought he even unalived some of the sahaba, but i take it back, thank you for correcting me brother
@@aqoonqaate8109 He was certainly behind some assassinations of major Sahaba, most notably Abdullah Ibn Zubayr. He made a name for himself after that and was later reported to have called a hit on Abdullah Ibn Umar and a few other major companions, so you were not mistaken in that respect.
He was appointed by Abdulmalik and went on to serve during the reign of Al-Walid too
Barakallahu Feekum
Sunni Muslims, Shia Muslims and whatever. it doesn't matter. the point is we have to believe in one God, and all his Angels and all Prophets and ths last day. that's it. we are believers then. then we are Muslims (Submitted to God).
Its all about your niya (intention). The prophet left behind the quran and ahulbait for the wise ones to follow
@HISTORYUN, can you please give a lecture on why and how so many Ahlul Bayts became shia? What was Shia school of thought like in the earlier times and the golden age? From what you've said, some Shia imams and schools of thought seem legit.
They are legit,. All the d
Four imams of Sunni schools trace back to imam Muhammad Al Baqir (as) or imam Sadiq (as) you naturally have to ask yourself why,. Then do these imams (as) have almost zero representation in the general Sunni corpus yet they claim them as Sunni Muslims,.
The easy explanation was many alids were heavily persecuted,.
@@jaleel42 That makes sense. Thank you. This means a lot to me.
@@ahmedlabeeb7518 I am Shia but I am kinda politically Sunni,. Not that I co-sign any Sunni leader,. But we are all Muslims,. People who hate Shia are usually infected by modern or old repackaged hate from power structures,. If all the Shia were gone soon the majority would zero in on Maliki say cuz “they pray kinda like Shia”
There is extremism in Shia too the imams (as) warned us of them and said they are worse than nasibis,.
Side note ,. When new converts come to the Shia mosque (we are open to all Muslims) I usually tell them to learn the mainstream Islam first,. Then explore the Shia argument,. Cuz to be a Shia or lover of ahlul bayt (as) ,. It is required to be knowledge and seek all knowledge,.
I hope this helps
Read every thing you ,. Can no matter what conclusion you come to,. If you stay in that mode of learning and striving for Allah’s knowledge,. You will have a station close to the martyrs ,.
Wa Salam 😎🥰😇
Is it possible for a 1000 people to do something that was originally copied from someone that was wrong?
It is possible but very unlikely. In the balance it probabilities, it's far more reliable than a written report attributed to a handful of people
And it's 1000 for a 1000, meaning 1000 people who learn or witnessed something identical from 1000 relatives and neighbours through an unbroken chain of transmission
Not to cause conflict but to state evidence backed stances, the Sunni view is that all great Imams of Ahlul Bayt did not have the views the Shias do today. They will deny this but there are plenty of evidences for the Imams having love for all sahaba especially Abu Bakr and Umar. In fact Zayd was deserted by many of his so called followers after showing unwavering support for them, to which he called them the ‘Rafidah’. That’s why traditional Sunnis love and accept them all and it’s a fact they taught the Imams. Shafi’i took from Sayyida Nafisa. Malik and Abu Hanifa took from Jafar and Abu Hanifa is famous for saying “If it wasn’t for the 2 years I spent with Jafar as Sadiq I would have perished”. Sayyidina Zayd also taught Imam Abu Hanifa and Abu Hanifa even gave financial support for Zayds uprising.
Sayyidina Jafar as Sadiq’s mother was Sayyida Umm Farwā Fātimā bint Imam Qāsim bin Muhammad. His maternal grandfather was Imam Qāsim bin Muhammad bin Abū Bakr, the grandson of Sayyidina Abū Bakr as-Siddīq raziyallahu anhum. His maternal grandmother was Asmā bint Abdur-Rahmān bin Abū Bakr, also a granddaughter of Sayyidina Abū Bakr. Thus he is reported to have said that “I was born by Abu Bakr twice”, referring to his maternal grandparents who were cousins and grandchildren of Sayyidina Abu Bakr. Imam Rabbani Shaykh Ahmed Sirhindi says in his Maktūbat that this may also refer to the fact that he was born in the noble family of Abū Bakr both physically and spiritually, as he received the spiritual secret of Sayyidina Abū Bakr as-Siddīq from his grandfather Imam Qāsim bin Muhammad. (This inheritance would become the spiritual Path of the Naqshbandis)
Keep in mind Zayd RH did fight and do Khrooj against the ummayds, which many modern Sunnis would reject as fighting the ruler. So on this he would be quite different.
@@Al_Sirat_Al_Mustaqeem It’s not to do with Sunni/Shia split thought, as his own brother Sayyidina Muhammad al Baqir did not join the revolt. The fact that’s Imam Abu Hanifa gave financial support (he was very wealthy) for the revolt against tyranny/corruption is enough said. Of course Ulema will have differing opinions but without doubt all traditional Sunnis love Sayyidina Zayd bin Ali. There are many examples of Imams of Ahlul Bayt turning away from war and fitna like that of Moulay Idris of Morocco and Ahmad bin Isa al Muhajir the grandfather of the Ba Alawis of Yemen both families of which are strong Sunnis. And as for not fighting or even criticising tyranny as they are the ‘rulers’ is only a position of the Wahabi/Saudi influenced scholars due to misunderstanding of a certain hadith. The original one who stood against tyranny was Sayyidinal Hussayn, and who could ever question him (apart from Wahabis who praise Yazeed nauzubillah)
This has been discussed in the private lessons and explained in detail. Tashayyu' was more or a fringe political party in the early days and later developed into a set of theological precepts and principles that remain irreconcilable with core Sunni teachings and tenets.
We cover topics in depth and with evidences on this program.
Barakallahu Feekum
@@Historyunlovely stuff thank you for your great an insightful work, السلام عليكم
Muhammad s.a.w. has nothing to do with you!
6:159 Indeed, those who have divided their religion and become sects - you, [O Muhammad], are not [associated] with them in anything. Their affair is only [left] to Allah ; then He will inform them about what they used to do.
30:31 [Adhere to it], turning in repentance to Him, and fear Him and establish prayer and do not be of those who associate others with Allah.
30:32 [Or] of those who have divided their religion and become sects, every faction rejoicing in what it has.
yes they are mushrikeen!!.. they have taken there scholars as lords beside allah!!
💯 accurate. Muhammad a.s. was a Muslim just like İbrahim a.s. not sunni, shia, ibadi
Indeed
~
Not everything that is worshipped instead of Allaah can be considered to be taaghoot. The most correct scholarly view concerning the meaning of the word Taaghoot is that of Ibn Jareer al-Tabari, who said in his Tafseer (3/21):
The correct opinion concerning Taaghoot, in my view, is that it refers to everyone who arrogates to himself a position that is befitting only for Allaah, and so is worshipped instead of Him, either by forcing others to worship him or by accepting their willing worship. The one that is thus worshipped may be a human being, or a shaytaan (devil), or an idol, or a statue, or some other being.
He also said that the root of Taaghoot implies putting oneself in a higher position and overstepping the mark.
The Prophets, scholars, righteous people and awliyaa’ (those who are close to Allaah) did not force people to worship them or obey them in such a thing. On the contrary, they issued the sternest warning against it. The purpose behind Allaah’s sending Messengers to mankind was to call them to believe in Allaah alone and to disbelieve in other gods besides Him. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And verily, We have sent among every Ummah (community, nation) a Messenger (proclaiming): ‘Worship Allaah (Alone), and avoid (or keep away from) Taaghoot (all false deities, etc. i.e., do not worship Taaghoot besides Allaah)…” [al-Nahl 16:36]
And Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And (remember) when Allaah will say (on the Day of Resurrection): “O ‘Eesaa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)! Did you say unto men: ‘Worship me and my mother as two gods besides Allaah?’ ” He will say: “Glory be to You! It was not for me to say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, You would surely have known it. You know what is in my inner‑self though I do not know what is in Yours; truly, You, only You, are the All‑Knower of all that is hidden (and unseen). “Never did I say to them aught except what You (Allaah) did command me to say: ‘Worship Allaah, my Lord and your Lord.’ And I was a witness over them while I dwelt amongst them, but when You took me up, You were the Watcher over them; and You are a Witness to all things” [al-Maa’idah 5:116-117]
If people worship Prophets or scholars instead of Allaah, we should not apply the word Taaghoot to the object of their worship.
If people exaggerate about al-Shaafa’i or any other scholar (may Allaah have mercy on them), and call upon them for help instead of Allaah, or worships their graves, there is no sin on those scholars; on the contrary, the burden of sin is on the one who associates others in worship with Allaah (Shirk). The same is true in the case of the Christians who worship ‘Eesaa (Jesus - peace be upon him) alongside Allaah. ‘Eesaa (peace be upon him) will not bear any part of their burden of sin. A brief definition of Taaghoot is: whoever is worshipped instead of Allaah and accepts that. It is well known that ‘Eesaa (peace be upon him) and other Prophets, and also al-Shaafa’i and other scholars who believed in Allaah alone (Tawheed) would never accept to be worshipped instead of Allaah. On the contrary, they forbade that and preached the message of Tawheed. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And (remember) when Allaah will say (on the Day of Resurrection): “O ‘Eesaa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)! Did you say unto men: ‘Worship me and my mother as two gods besides Allaah?’ ” He will say: “Glory be to You! It was not for me to say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, You would surely have known it. You know what is in my inner self though I do not know what is in Yours; truly, You, only You, are the All Knower of all that is hidden (and unseen). “Never did I say to them aught except what You (Allaah) did command me to say: ‘Worship Allaah, my Lord and your Lord.’ And I was a witness over them while I dwelt amongst them, but when You took me up, You were the Watcher over them; and You are a Witness to all things” [al-Maa’idah 5:116-117].
@@losrajvosa0078
QS 12:106, Warning from Allah, "..... majority who are in the state of "yuk min billah, are musyrikun....."
why did it end at the Khwarij section? MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN. You did us dirty
I know.. i hate it when I'm so getting into the talk and then the video finishes.. SMH.. it's such a tease.
You should check the link in the desciption for the full 3 hour course :)
I am a muslim on the ibrahamic way he is our father and names us muslims ☪️ 😉 😄
Then you are literally Hanafi 😉
ما شاالله
@23:23 be careful ahk 😅😭😭😭
Jazak Allah
Barakallahu Feekum
The Hothies are Raffadi and they do curse the sahabah and Aisha
They are predominantly Zaydi, just like Saudi Arabia is predominantly Hanbali.
@@Historyun zaidi might be their origins but they are now days Raffadi Shia that curse the sahabah and Ahlu Sunnah. There are regular zaydis in Yemen that are not like the Hothies.
@@Historyun I have lived with the Hothies in their strong hold in the North of Yemen. I have seen and experienced their ways and beliefs. I have friends from Ahlu Sunnah that were under siege by them, and were killed by the Hothies. They sometimes bury a dog up to the neck and throw rocks at it while calling it Aisha.
@@abuhijjra Dammaj?
@@Historyun yes in Saddah. I lived there for 2 1/2 years and experienced one short war there between the government and the Hothies. They mutilated the bodies of some of the students they killed. I have prayed with regular Zaydis in Sanaa before the Hothies took over.
Imam Hussain didn't go to war against the Ummayad criminals, Yazeed laanati declared war upon the Ahlulbayt like his father and grandfather before him
it is your kaffir progenitors who betrayed Hadhrat Hussein Radiallahu Anhu i.e. shia majoosi rafidhis and not Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamaah, shias are not muslims
The possibility of Imam abu hanifa to be student of imam jafar sadiq could not be correct, because imam abu hanifa rahmatullah aley lived and grew in a different city Kufa and their teachers were mainly from there.
This is a great lie have been spread by 12 shis
Abu Hanifa was known to visit Imam Maalik in Madinah, this is very common knowledge. When he died, his student About Yusuf would visit Imam Maalik and he would even tease Imam Maalik about the Adhan of Madinah only having 2 Takbiraat.
Qibla has changed so many times!
When it comes to balad al Kufa Sufyan Ath Thawri رحيم الله has more rights in terms of being from the Ulemah of Kufa than Abu Hanifa. The Salaf made Jarh of Abu Hanifa when it came to the matter of Irja and choosing qiyas over the Hadith when it came to him.
However nobody today is following the Madhab of Sufyan and Abu Hanifa has influenced the greatest number of Muslims in the history of Islam (in terms of Madhahib). There was no greater scholar than Abu Hanifa coming out of Kufa. It is enough that the likes of Imam as-Shaafi' are students of his students and Imam Ahmad a student of his student of his student
@@HistoryunI see where you were going with this. But I’m pointing out when it comes to the matter of Abu Hanifa the Jarh still remains upon him between him and Sufyan likewise the jarh of other imams like Imam Al Awzai criticized him as well as Sufyan Ibn Uyanah and Imam Ash Shafii also Imam Ahmad and Ibnul Mubarak. Ahlul Sunnah affirms Abu Hanifa as a scholar but Qadhi Abu Yusuf had to correct a lot of mistakes from his Madhab due to disagreements in Hadith application and too much opinion being put over the text. Too be fair the Ahnaf of old aren’t like those today from the likes of the maturidiyah which ascribe a false aqeedah which they promote between the brelivis and deobandiyyah. Almost in comparison with the ashirah and the shafiiyah of Azhar. My main point is though that people over praise Abu Hanifa ascribing to him which is not befitting for him a lot of it is ghuluw. But they completely dismiss the Jarh and throw Sufyan being an imam from Kufa out the window or defame the likes of the madhab of Al Imam Ahmad for putting the Hadith and the Ijma of the Sahabah above qiyas.
@@Abuhafsahalsalafithat would lead to the logical conclusion that the vast majority of Muslim in history were followers of an Imam who didn't quite understand Islam properly. Not willing to accept that narrative. Abu Hanifa is one of the greatest Imams in Islam, perfection belongs only to the Anbiya and Rusul, those who criticised him also had their own critics, where do we draw the line?
@@Historyun Of course perfection belongs with Anbiya Wa Rasoul Alaihum As Salaatul Wa Salaam without a doubt. The notion that I was pointing to is the ghuluw of today’s followers of Abu Hanifa. Calling him Imam Al A’zam is going way too far in my view because of the valid Jarh that is made by the Salaf against him. As stated previously he’s still accepted as an imam but the people today may be in large number followers of the madhab of Ahnaf. But Ahlul Sunnah doesn’t use numbers as proofs that’s why the status of Imams like Imam Ahmad and Ishaq Ibn Rahwayh are noted and respected for their efforts. But in todays time people throw away the Jarh based off their emotions and go into another extreme with being oh Abu Hanifa is the only one who has a valid Madhab so they believe they can revile Imam Ash Shafii, Ahmad, Al Baani even the Sheikhayn “two sheikhs” Sheikh ul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah and Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab. Today’s Ahnaf almost raise Abu Hanifa to the status of The Prophet Alayhi Salaatul WaSalaam Wa Iyadhu Billah. Meaning the Hadith would say one thing but they take the opinion of Numan Ibn thabibt.
No sugar-coating is enough to give blind eyes to corruption !!!
Birth place of blind-following & all fall form of corrupt beliefs...kufa
No justification... Changing/modifying sunnah according to Akl ...
Only Ali A.S. Was chosen by the people.
Shut up.
@@adnanabdull4h you shut up nasibi. Lanatullah on Nasibi's.
I’m just a Muslim but i prefer the ibadi madhab, they seem the most trustworthy.
@Adonis300 The closest to him was ahl albait
Audhubillah. The Ibadi madhhab arose out of the khawarij! They are merely a diluted version of that. Khawarij are the same people who put the Sahaba against each other and killed Uthman and Ali. The ibadis to this day disparage two of our beloved khulafa.
@@bigmanrayray. you say you love sahaba who killed other sahaba. Some of the sahaba were “khawarijj” according to your scholars, but you accept the ummayds and alids who killed each other. According to your own hadith to curse a Muslim is fisq, and to kill a Muslim is kufr.
@@bigmanrayray. you say you love sahaba who killed other sahaba. Some of the sahaba were “khawarijj” according to your scholars, but you accept the ummayds and alids who killed each other. According to your own hadith to curse a Muslim is fisq, and to kill a Muslim is kufr.
@@bigmanrayray. you say you love men, the scholars of Oman love principles of Religion.
Mathabism is the Main reason the Ummah is in the pitiful state it's in.
Wrong.
It's the arrogance of Sunnis that is the result of all this. Every relgion have sects but they are united. Why not Islam? Because Sunnis dont want to. They hate other sects while we Shias are strong and still fighting Ezrahell.
@MustafaAli-lb8dq Wrong. Go read and understand the Quran if you can, you will then understand. You think if the Prophet (SAW) was around now, he would be congratulating the 'Mathhabs. Stick to your Shiaism, I'll stick to my Islam.
@@BigOmes1 Quran says don'take sects among yourself. But sects will still be made a cording to Hadith and only one will go to heaven. That sect is not stated. Sunni's arrogance says only they will go to heaven
@MustafaAli-lb8dq Listen to me very carefully brother, if a certain hadith, contradicts the Quran, it's not genuine.
Call to Islam you are 100 Right Ibadi are very carefullwhen they speak about Islam Quran and Our Prophet SAW
The soccaled Sunni and Shia became more an ideology
Loving the new haircut Mashallah; you should make a video about Tariq Tijanniyah of West Africa
Barakallahu Feekum 💎
The Shi ites believe that Ali ibnou Abu Talib was perfect but he made also mistakes in the battle of the Camel the Khawarij chose the side of Oum Aysha 3alayha salam our Prophets Beloved wife may ALLAH grand her with peace and blessing
What a nice way to divide islam like hinduism. There is no classification of islam. Black belal was muslim, white arabs were muslim. Sunni sushi shia pizza is just to distract muslim from islam.