Martin Heidegger Being And Time Part 1/9

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 49

  • @kzazazazk
    @kzazazazk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This makes reading Foucault sound like a walk in the park 😅

  • @stevenwillbethere
    @stevenwillbethere หลายเดือนก่อน

    A Brilliant poet in thought

  • @anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858
    @anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    14:12 starts

    • @myinfo9406
      @myinfo9406 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thank you! 🙏

  • @host228
    @host228 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ignore the introduction by whomever, amd listen to the translated words of a genius Heidegger. Rule 1 in philosophy is do the best you can at reading the original and avoid interpretation until after you have spent significant time with the original.

  • @moviechilltime123
    @moviechilltime123 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ok wait…………….. I’’M LOSST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😅😅😅😅😂

  • @moviechilltime123
    @moviechilltime123 หลายเดือนก่อน

    OK….. I’M LOST!!!!!!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @moviechilltime123
    @moviechilltime123 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    OK. I am so lost! 😅

  • @holgerjrgensen2166
    @holgerjrgensen2166 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Being, is the Sready Point,
    Time is the 'shadow' of Motion.

  • @arlieferguson7442
    @arlieferguson7442 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Begins at 14:16.

  • @almightylovelord
    @almightylovelord วันที่ผ่านมา

    §1 - 15:40
    §2 - 23:50
    §3 - 35:50
    §4 - 45:25
    §5 - 56:30
    §6 - 1:11:10

  • @BrettonFerguson
    @BrettonFerguson ปีที่แล้ว +10

    “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If the-if he-if ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not-that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement. … Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true.” -Bill Clinton 1998

    • @user-cs6ze7ve2j
      @user-cs6ze7ve2j 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      bill clinton must have read the tractatus by Ludwig Wittgenstein to use metaphysical assertion to get out of trouble lol

    • @thenowchurch6419
      @thenowchurch6419 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Heidegger is small potatoes.
      You need to read Hegel.

    • @user-cs6ze7ve2j
      @user-cs6ze7ve2j 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      hegel is small potatoes you need to read schaupenhauers roasting hegel. In pretty much every book of his.@@thenowchurch6419

    • @doclime4792
      @doclime4792 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@thenowchurch6419small potatoes? 🥔 let me make one thing to you clear my obviously infirmed friend, you have potato and then you have pototo. There can be not one without the other! One side of potato is hot and otherside of pototo is freezing cold. It must be cooked and cooked to perfection to be a 🥔 and even then without the right ingredients it's but a simple thing. But go on enjoy simple things, only life is simple.

    • @thenowchurch6419
      @thenowchurch6419 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@doclime4792 Nice. I see what you did there.

  • @IAmSplate
    @IAmSplate 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I don’t know what that monologue at the start is for but I gotta tell ya, I don’t care for it one bit

  •  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Reading the first sentence in ancient Greek I already started questioning my being

  • @mustyHead6
    @mustyHead6 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    idk if this is the most profound thing or the most stupid but im all for it

  • @moviechilltime123
    @moviechilltime123 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I know they can be helpful but I am annoyed to hell by introductions. Time stamps please, for the love of god

  • @Flammenhagel
    @Flammenhagel 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    45:00 timestamp

  • @keegster7167
    @keegster7167 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    1:18 “Aristotle and lived and died and that’s all you need to know about him.” What’s important is not the man than the work.

  • @hodgeyhodge8414
    @hodgeyhodge8414 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    OK. I'm lost. 😅

    • @benjaminseng4271
      @benjaminseng4271 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Ive listened to about 90 hrs of courses prior to tackling this as its considered the most difficult read in philosophy. Sartre first then Hiedegger.

    • @ixutiini5793
      @ixutiini5793 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@benjaminseng4271 Could you provide some reference to a few of them which you considered to be most helpful?

    • @MrJamesdryable
      @MrJamesdryable 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Who's lost?

    • @user-ep6sq6kc5p
      @user-ep6sq6kc5p 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hah

    • @user-ep6sq6kc5p
      @user-ep6sq6kc5p 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@benjaminseng4271 hah

  • @yp77738yp77739
    @yp77738yp77739 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don’t understand the purpose or the value of trying to describe the human condition as something special or unique. For me it is all very simple, we are just another living organism whose particular evolution has provided us with certain pattern solving functionality. But beyond the hormonal drivers of survival through to the point of transferring our genetics through to subsequent generations, there isn’t anything more of actual significance to say about us beyond that of the trees or insects.

    • @sholoms
      @sholoms 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In a larger sense &/or put into a visual metaphor, & not I think irrelevantly as a part of my overall intelectual framework, I agree with u. None the less; as well as more comfortably, I often find it valuable to explore invitingly different points of view than my own, & in this instance (& potential case) maybe important to explore those quite connected differences among, yet specific to my species, from the inside, while surveying & acknowledging the other differences from outside them in order to try getting a bette, generalr grasp of Consciousness. In brief, please keep talking -- cuz I'm listening & (may even) get it...

  • @sabrisaad8858
    @sabrisaad8858 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    56:24

  • @joshua_finch
    @joshua_finch 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Reader is not so bad at Greek pronunciation. It could use some work, though.

  • @multiplescrotums774
    @multiplescrotums774 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Skip the first 14 minutes. It's not the book, just some inconsiderate persons opinion. Waste of time

  • @skiphoffenflaven8004
    @skiphoffenflaven8004 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is pathetic thinking.

  • @jamesgorman7846
    @jamesgorman7846 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lies told by a Nazi full of rebarbative prose signifying 'the Nothjing that Nothings' ( best self reference)

    • @user-cs6ze7ve2j
      @user-cs6ze7ve2j 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      engage with the material not the philosopher