One of the few philosophy channels not lead by a pseud. Very interesting video, thank you very much for the effort. I learnt a lot about German Whitehead 👍
look around for recordings of philosophy profs giving lectures or running through lecture slides. it's concise and it's a good alternative to looking through SEP if you want to into a certain topic
This is the best break down I’ve seen of “Being and time” here on YT…as clear and concise as it possibly could be for a book such as this one. Excellent work!!
This has served me as a good refresher. Thank you. I attended & recently reviewed Drefus' lectures and later worked w/ his student, Fred Doland, in a course called "Heigegger for Artists."
I found this yesterday night and fell asleep. I was dreaming about people I know which all could recite Heidegger which I was very impressed by.. 😂 Anyway. Excellent video - top notch!
Hi from Japan! This is the best video to someone like me who have little kowledge about philosophy, but feel like 10 mimutes summary video is not intellectually stimulating at all😂
While I absolutely disagree with the notion that we can separate the man from the thought, I do believe that his work - as well as that of others with questionable associations and decisions, a la Ezra Pound - is nonetheless invaluable and worthy of earnest study.
He may have seen himself as the potential "philosophical führer" who'd advise the Führer much like Plato tried to be the state philosopher to Dionysius II of Syracuse, Sicily. As for his non-disowning his pro-Naziism, I think he refrained from doing so in the spirit that "nothing serious happened in that direction, disown what?". A sad, sad affair anyway. Still, I believe that we can avail ourselves of his philosophical genius.
Thank you for this video since I struggled with some parts of the book, they seemed intentionally obscure at time. My husband keeps telling me Heidegger is so deep and out of our collective grasp of understanding. Imma rub his face with my newfound understanding of Heidegger 🤭
Awesome! But maybe it's better to use "eastern" rather than "Japanese" at 9:51? Both "Zen" (as a branch of Chinese Buddhism, influencing Japanese Zen a lot) and "Taoist" originated in China. Only "Shinto" is purely Japanese?
This is true. I meant to imply that he was very "Japanese" in thought, and that many have pointed out his similarity to "eastern" philosophies that have had significant influences on Japanese culture (including ones that originated in China). I should have been clearer in my language, but oh well. Live and learn :)
NEXT part: anticipatory resoluteness is unitary (equiprimordial). anticipatory - understanding our being as it truly is via being-towards-death resoluteness - having authentic awareness and ownership of our own guilt and responsibility to choose how we are these imply one another. hermeneutic circle. now going to look at temporality on a deeper ontological ground. Dasein's structure is care whether authentic of inauthentic (both have their own 3's) In authentic structure, dasein appears before itself as a whole. so now we can look at dasein not just existentially (what it means to me) but look at the actual structure, what that being means in and of itself.
dasein now reinterpreted on more fundamental basis. what makes it possibile for there to be care and thus anticipatory resoluteness? Temporality. ekstasis - standing out. future (being-towards-death, needs a future, look out and go towards, has meaning towards us, project possibilities into ) past (coming from a past, needed, certain possibilities as a range before me determined from the past, more complex than memory) present (current situations and acts, where things make themselves present) so the definition of the care structure as a definition includes these 3 temporalities. authentic time is finite (death/guilt as centred around ourselves) inauthentic time is infinite
temporality and everydayness: were going to review all the existentials of care and ground them temporally. thrownness as focussed on past (there already, anxiety and fear as authentic and inauthetnic. authentic repetition and inauthentic fear fear: fearing is actually past because our past and what we have been is threatened. fear is inauthentic because we are absorbed in the world. thereofre our past understanding is inauthentic as it is in relation to the world and things in it (forgetting) anxiety: authentic because revolving around dasein, not world or object. we see nowhere to take action (which is oriented to the future) but is also occasioned by having been. this is called Repetition. disposedness as focussed on future (always has understanding linked to future whether authentic or inauthentic. anticiiapton and expectation. falleness as focussed on present (always inauthentic, concerned with actual things going on around us.called making present. [there is moment of vision as authentic present but only in relation to throwness and disposedness, see possiiblities before us] Discourse also occurs in temporal beause language has grammar of past future and present.
dasein in time: ready to hand is in the present because its without self. there is an awaiting and retain (future and past) of the hammer but they still occur in the present. present at hand - comes hrough by resoluteness from ready to hand. and this only occurs as from the future when we attempt to discover the 'truth' the world - future - something for the sake of which (future possibilities) implied again has little presence (in order to) and past (thrown circumstances) in it too. temporality allows all three to come together into a unified structure. spatiality only occurs in falleness (that phone the person is closer to you) and therefore occurs in the present.
temporality and historicality dasien comes to an end, but it also has a beginning. no i before the world. historicising: work out what is most meaningful from a historical perspective. inauthetnic historicality (list of events) authentic historicality (in temporality): heritage: past events that affect one's comprehension of oneself. like america and american revolution, personaly signficiant. take it up as part of tradition (can strike out in different ways). can take it on vaguely. but can't step out of it fully. fate: awareness of possibilities in definite range. resolute towards own possibilities. accepting what may happen. resolutely accepting what may happen on basis of our own authentic choosing destiny: people/nations at once through fate. the future is most important ekstasis. the past becomes meaningful only through future actions. historical: lincoln's pipe is still there but its no longer ready to hand as equipment. the dasien itself is gone (the world is no longer there) and therefore the locus of historically is seen in dasein, not the object existing. history as worlds of daseins that came before. world-history: focussing on fate-destiny of set people and thus particular world (nexus of intelligibility that they exist in). authentically, we get access to what shaped their world of past daseins and we can make future choices more clearly and salient from this. history as a story.
clock-time is an abstraction of something more real. but experience ime as ekastsis which allows past and future meaningful. dasiens being is fully temporal. to be dasein is to be temporal
Thank you for making this video. On terminology, you don't mention translating Befindlichkeit as " attunement.". Stambough is not the only translator to use that tetm. See also Fundamental Concepts....translated by McNeill and Walker. I find the term "attunement" to be useful
Who cares about whether you like or dislike someone regardless, don't ideas make sense on their own? Additionally, I saw your video on the Tractatus. Perhaps you would be interested in doing thematic discussion on literature like VN's or other fiction you like?
How can we describe "being" from the inside of "being" itself. The meaning of existence can't be defined from within existence, and since there is nothing outside existence, then the question is absurd. Same happens with "being". Am I wrong? Wonderful video, although I sometimes woder if some of these definitions are a bit silly. Let's define and talk about the downside-downes of the world in which we dasin. The world is not upside-down and we always feel the gravity pull in one directikn. This allows us to experience, phenomenologically, the "downside-downess" of the world atevery moment. Existence or "being" is thus "being in the world, in a continuous time and with the proper "das dowsideness" 😉 That's how some of these things sound.
I‘m German and found it hilarious how much explaining needs to be done to understand Heidegger‘s terms, meanwhile they are intuitively understood in German. One would even get a different impression if one relied on the English translation at face value. Great video though, haven‘t seen another one that thoroughly explained him as well.
He lies in the first moments of the presentation. Absurd. Heidegger, on e, says of Aristotle he wants to say no more. Then the birth and place and death date. He doesn't say what this guy says. Boring.
1. control 2. deception 3. blame 4. furthering control 5. demoralisation 6. reasons to repair for the first five stages. 7. complete control for the good of all.
He really seemed to hold Nazism in high regard and helped implement it, and never disowned it. I just can’t decide if he was a real Nazi or not! He thought a lot about Nazism, but it’s impossible to say that it influenced his writing. I guess some people are too sensitive and just see Nazis everywhere!
The man wrote in his dairy "I'm still a Nazi" and there you are, looking for an out. And his bestiality expressed in his philosophy is not proof enough?
Easy but misleading expalantion as the notion things shows up in two ways is wrong cause it is only our subjective experience...the objective world was there in both cases in totality and conceptualizing....it is we who are changing our focus and orientation....the two ways to experience things are not actually world rather in one way we experience world in whole and in other way in particularly above that whole..the relational aspect of world was there in both experiences but its deviation of experiencing that was increased by disturbance....world is preconditioned and prerelated but its manifestation of particular relations that gets oriented by daseins...the ready to hand totality is a holistic understanding or state of mind above that our particular thoughts build up and present to hand is thinking or concepts that build upon on that experience.. Its a shifts from one kind of experience i.e, state of mind, understanding to thinking not from world to deworled...also for distance and closeness the physical things are close to me in my role in objective world but for the phenomenal world, they are far. so objectively physical relational space-time would be primary then this phenomenal would be secondary.......
I watched this a month ago and came back to marvel at this video a second time. Absolutely phenomenal work sir.
i believe you mean "absolutely _phenomenological_ work."
@GenteelCretin that'd be tautology, would it not? :)
>phenomenal work
hehe
One of the few philosophy channels not lead by a pseud.
Very interesting video, thank you very much for the effort.
I learnt a lot about German Whitehead 👍
Do you know any other channels like Jade's? This is basically the only channel I can find not lead by a pseud.
@@timeastwood2666 www.youtube.com/@eversbrothersproductions1476 is pretty good
@@timeastwood2666 Carefree wandering and victor gijsbers come to mind,hit me up if you found some too!
look around for recordings of philosophy profs giving lectures or running through lecture slides. it's concise and it's a good alternative to looking through SEP if you want to into a certain topic
If psued is stand-in for autodidact the only thing you’re doing is telling on yourself. 😂
Definitely one of the better commentaries on TH-cam. High quality, thoughtful, & close to the text. Thank you!
This is the best break down I’ve seen of “Being and time” here on YT…as clear and concise as it possibly could be for a book such as this one. Excellent work!!
Truly, truly amazing video ^_^ what a tremendous effort must have gone into this!
The greatest day of my year so far
I am so extremely thankful for this. I am finishing B&T and I really wanted a full reivew like this as I get to the conclusion. Thank you so much.
This has served me as a good refresher. Thank you. I attended & recently reviewed Drefus' lectures and later worked w/ his student, Fred Doland, in a course called "Heigegger for Artists."
INCREDIBLE video - wow! Maybe the best break down of S&Z online. Thanks so much for doing this
the best without a doubt
Being a self/taught philosophy student, a need for correspondence is a must. I'm wanting to find those who love philosophy as much as I.
I found this yesterday night and fell asleep. I was dreaming about people I know which all could recite Heidegger which I was very impressed by.. 😂 Anyway. Excellent video - top notch!
Amazing video, I hope you keep on posting more philosophy content
This video is breathtaking!
Early on the the photo of Blochmann is also a picture of Arendt, so you have two pictures of Arendt. The presentation is amazing.
Great Job Jade. Without your brilliant explainer I may have simply given up on reading B&T and gone straight to the G&T
You’re doing great stuff, sir. Thank you
Hi from Japan! This is the best video to someone like me who have little kowledge about philosophy, but feel like 10 mimutes summary video is not intellectually stimulating at all😂
youre better than university professors, like wtf man, how can it be?
While I absolutely disagree with the notion that we can separate the man from the thought, I do believe that his work - as well as that of others with questionable associations and decisions, a la Ezra Pound - is nonetheless invaluable and worthy of earnest study.
Do YOU think of a pink elephant just now?
He may have seen himself as the potential "philosophical führer" who'd advise the Führer much like Plato tried to be the state philosopher to Dionysius II of Syracuse, Sicily. As for his non-disowning his pro-Naziism, I think he refrained from doing so in the spirit that "nothing serious happened in that direction, disown what?". A sad, sad affair anyway. Still, I believe that we can avail ourselves of his philosophical genius.
subahibi into western philosophy pipeline?
Thanks for the content. There needs more complete Heidegger commentary on TH-cam.
Another Banger, Sir
Thank you for introducing him
this wasn't a pseud video! wow, you earned a sub
excellent upload. thanks for your work
This is excellent, thank you so much
Thank you, this is quite interesting
Amazing. Thanks.
Thank you for this video since I struggled with some parts of the book, they seemed intentionally obscure at time. My husband keeps telling me Heidegger is so deep and out of our collective grasp of understanding. Imma rub his face with my newfound understanding of Heidegger 🤭
Another W from Jade Vine
Sweet video
Are you a philosophy student? Do you have any socials? Would love to chat with you on some of this! Excellent work
thank you so so much
Thank you.
Any such commentary on critique of pure reason on yt?
Awesome! But maybe it's better to use "eastern" rather than "Japanese" at 9:51? Both "Zen" (as a branch of Chinese Buddhism, influencing Japanese Zen a lot) and "Taoist" originated in China. Only "Shinto" is purely Japanese?
This is true. I meant to imply that he was very "Japanese" in thought, and that many have pointed out his similarity to "eastern" philosophies that have had significant influences on Japanese culture (including ones that originated in China). I should have been clearer in my language, but oh well. Live and learn :)
@@DwellingInTheFourfold Yep, exactly. At least, "being-towards-death" is very Japanese, lol.
Wonderful video
NEXT part:
anticipatory resoluteness is unitary (equiprimordial).
anticipatory - understanding our being as it truly is via being-towards-death
resoluteness - having authentic awareness and ownership of our own guilt and responsibility to choose how we are
these imply one another. hermeneutic circle.
now going to look at temporality on a deeper ontological ground.
Dasein's structure is care whether authentic of inauthentic (both have their own 3's)
In authentic structure, dasein appears before itself as a whole. so now we can look at dasein not just existentially (what it means to me) but look at the actual structure, what that being means in and of itself.
dasein now reinterpreted on more fundamental basis.
what makes it possibile for there to be care and thus anticipatory resoluteness? Temporality.
ekstasis - standing out.
future (being-towards-death, needs a future, look out and go towards, has meaning towards us, project possibilities into )
past (coming from a past, needed, certain possibilities as a range before me determined from the past, more complex than memory)
present (current situations and acts, where things make themselves present)
so the definition of the care structure as a definition includes these 3 temporalities.
authentic time is finite (death/guilt as centred around ourselves)
inauthentic time is infinite
temporality and everydayness:
were going to review all the existentials of care and ground them temporally.
thrownness as focussed on past (there already, anxiety and fear as authentic and inauthetnic. authentic repetition and inauthentic fear
fear: fearing is actually past because our past and what we have been is threatened. fear is inauthentic because we are absorbed in the world. thereofre our past understanding is inauthentic as it is in relation to the world and things in it (forgetting)
anxiety: authentic because revolving around dasein, not world or object. we see nowhere to take action (which is oriented to the future) but is also occasioned by having been. this is called Repetition.
disposedness as focussed on future (always has understanding linked to future whether authentic or inauthentic. anticiiapton and expectation.
falleness as focussed on present (always inauthentic, concerned with actual things going on around us.called making present. [there is moment of vision as authentic present but only in relation to throwness and disposedness, see possiiblities before us]
Discourse also occurs in temporal beause language has grammar of past future and present.
dasein in time:
ready to hand is in the present because its without self. there is an awaiting and retain (future and past) of the hammer but they still occur in the present.
present at hand - comes hrough by resoluteness from ready to hand. and this only occurs as from the future when we attempt to discover the 'truth'
the world - future - something for the sake of which (future possibilities) implied again has little presence (in order to) and past (thrown circumstances) in it too. temporality allows all three to come together into a unified structure.
spatiality only occurs in falleness (that phone the person is closer to you) and therefore occurs in the present.
temporality and historicality
dasien comes to an end, but it also has a beginning.
no i before the world.
historicising: work out what is most meaningful from a historical perspective.
inauthetnic historicality (list of events)
authentic historicality (in temporality):
heritage: past events that affect one's comprehension of oneself. like america and american revolution, personaly signficiant. take it up as part of tradition (can strike out in different ways). can take it on vaguely. but can't step out of it fully.
fate: awareness of possibilities in definite range. resolute towards own possibilities. accepting what may happen. resolutely accepting what may happen on basis of our own authentic choosing
destiny: people/nations at once through fate.
the future is most important ekstasis. the past becomes meaningful only through future actions.
historical: lincoln's pipe is still there but its no longer ready to hand as equipment. the dasien itself is gone (the world is no longer there) and therefore the locus of historically is seen in dasein, not the object existing. history as worlds of daseins that came before.
world-history: focussing on fate-destiny of set people and thus particular world (nexus of intelligibility that they exist in). authentically, we get access to what shaped their world of past daseins and we can make future choices more clearly and salient from this.
history as a story.
clock-time is an abstraction of something more real. but experience ime as ekastsis which allows past and future meaningful.
dasiens being is fully temporal. to be dasein is to be temporal
1:26 mistake 2 hannah arendt's pictures
noted in the description, thanks for pointing it out
Didn't Wittgenstein write in english primarily?
I'm not a fan of Heidegger but I really enjoyed your video regardless, keep it up!
What do we mean when we say something exists?
Woooooow 🎉🎉🎉🎉
Holy shit this is amazing.
Thank you for making this video. On terminology, you don't mention translating Befindlichkeit as " attunement.". Stambough is not the only translator to use that tetm. See also Fundamental Concepts....translated by McNeill and Walker. I find the term "attunement" to be useful
What *is* the meaning of "is", anyway? 🤔🧠
Right & (of course) not for the last time, particularly in re to S&Z!
Would you ever make a Whitehead video?
Who cares about whether you like or dislike someone regardless, don't ideas make sense on their own?
Additionally, I saw your video on the Tractatus. Perhaps you would be interested in doing thematic discussion on literature like VN's or other fiction you like?
can you plz share the slides
gem
How can we describe "being" from the inside of "being" itself. The meaning of existence can't be defined from within existence, and since there is nothing outside existence, then the question is absurd. Same happens with "being". Am I wrong? Wonderful video, although I sometimes woder if some of these definitions are a bit silly. Let's define and talk about the downside-downes of the world in which we dasin. The world is not upside-down and we always feel the gravity pull in one directikn. This allows us to experience, phenomenologically, the "downside-downess" of the world atevery moment. Existence or "being" is thus "being in the world, in a continuous time and with the proper "das dowsideness" 😉 That's how some of these things sound.
I found “Being and Time” to be incomprehensible. Wittgenstein is easy to understand.
this is goated
Wow and still I understand nothing, enough to give me a headache. His essays actually make sense to me though.
Pretty sure that his rejection of modernity has been vindicated…
I‘m German and found it hilarious how much explaining needs to be done to understand Heidegger‘s terms, meanwhile they are intuitively understood in German. One would even get a different impression if one relied on the English translation at face value. Great video though, haven‘t seen another one that thoroughly explained him as well.
part 1: 4 hours is promising
1:34:05
He lies in the first moments of the presentation. Absurd. Heidegger, on e, says of Aristotle he wants to say no more. Then the birth and place and death date. He doesn't say what this guy says. Boring.
Amazing! Has inspired me to actually read this by 2027 😅
Heidegger explained? But, from where? From spiritualism? Or materialism? or idealism? Is it a doxa or a interpetation? Define it!
1. control
2. deception
3. blame
4. furthering control
5. demoralisation
6. reasons to repair for the first five stages.
7. complete control for the good of all.
He really seemed to hold Nazism in high regard and helped implement it, and never disowned it. I just can’t decide if he was a real Nazi or not! He thought a lot about Nazism, but it’s impossible to say that it influenced his writing. I guess some people are too sensitive and just see Nazis everywhere!
The man wrote in his dairy "I'm still a Nazi" and there you are, looking for an out.
And his bestiality expressed in his philosophy is not proof enough?
And what if he was?
gross
@@horsymandias-ur his philosophy is pure Nazi bestiality
If he was a nazi, would that make his philosophy any more or less correct?
Easy but misleading expalantion as the notion things shows up in two ways is wrong cause it is only our subjective experience...the objective world was there in both cases in totality and conceptualizing....it is we who are changing our focus and orientation....the two ways to experience things are not actually world rather in one way we experience world in whole and in other way in particularly above that whole..the relational aspect of world was there in both experiences but its deviation of experiencing that was increased by disturbance....world is preconditioned and prerelated but its manifestation of particular relations that gets oriented by daseins...the ready to hand totality is a holistic understanding or state of mind above that our particular thoughts build up and present to hand is thinking or concepts that build upon on that experience.. Its a shifts from one kind of experience i.e, state of mind, understanding to thinking not from world to deworled...also for distance and closeness the physical things are close to me in my role in objective world but for the phenomenal world, they are far. so objectively physical relational space-time would be primary then this phenomenal would be secondary.......
FINALLY
Utterly dizzying in its genius.
Wilson Elizabeth Davis Barbara White Richard
ow my brain
The real elephant in the room is that his analysis and conclusion about the nature of the Jews was wholly accurate.
I may be wrong but I think Heidegger is full of sh*t! And his writing style just adds to that.
Noice
Finally Heidegger is made intelligible on English TH-cam.
Martin Frank Johnson Gary Young Ronald
Allen Cynthia Brown Robert Jackson Amy
still the prime example of nonsense
How so?
you just don't understand it :P
@@laurencehulme173 if u get it u get it if u don't move on
@@Max-kv8uwlook up the guy in abductivereply's pfp. Particularly his infamous comment on "Das Nichts nichtet"
No, he's just a German obscurantist genius