So wearing it slightly higher (although it seemed to be in a standard position) is a violation, but if he had taken it off all together it isn't? What the hell kinda rule is that!
You can see the helmet at 0:20 onward... Looks perfectly fine to me! I kinda feel like the ref just had something against Komarov... That or they simply wanted to make a statement that "this rule will now be enforced"...
I dont get this rule. There are players who dont wear visors. If that is deemed unsafe then every nhl player should wear a visor. Is it an equipment violation for not having ear guards? Is it an equipment violation if your chin strap is too low? Cause thats unsafe. You know what，visors are unsafe too. That means the whole nhl should wear cages too. i understand player safety but this is a joke. You ever keep it consistent or let them do what they prefer.
What's more, Komarov is grandfathered and is eligible to play without a visor! So no visor would be perfectly good, but some visor is bad bad bad for some reason.
Is it an equipment violation for not having ear guards? hmmm yes.many industries you need to have the right protection equipment, if you dont, the insurance company can lawsuit your boss and you boss gonna have to pay instead of the insurance company. In this case, if he gets a puck to the eye, the ref or the NHL or I don't know who, could be in trouble for not applying the rule. Welcome to the adult world ;) Does the rule need to be change? Maybe, I don't know. That an other question really, but I think you see my point.
From how it looks on the replay, Komarov seemed to be wearing his visor and helmet correctly when the penalty was called. Therefore, the penalty was called to make up for previous infractions and to send a message, making an example out of Komarov. In the future, Komarov should wear his helmet and visor positioned properly at all times, or get rid of the visor altogether if it bothers him that much. The Bauer 4500 helmet model he wears is one of the lowest profile helmets available and fits very close on the head. Pushing that helmet up his forehead would effectively negate most of the protection that would be needed in the event of any kind of frontal impact.
I think the whole point was along the lines of, "If you're gonna wear a visor, you gotta wear it according to the rules.", because they even said that Komarov had been grandfathered in, which meant he didn't *have to* wear a visor in the first place, so either wear it right, or don't wear it at all. That's what I got out of that.
This rule is insane. He’s grandfathered in. How does hagelin get away with it then?? This, the jersey tuck rule. These rules are so stupid turning the NHL into the NFL.
Rule 9.7 states that IF you wear a visor it needs to cover your eyes. Komarov has done this all preseason and the league has told him MULTIPLE times to fix it, but never did.
That was then but last night TB scored a goal in an important game 6 and had no chin strap on . So that’s either an old rule or their different rules for different players
Some players are grandfathered in to older rules like Komarov was here. The problem in this video was that Komarov wasn't following the grandfather clause nor the new rule, so it was a penalty. In your example, if there is a grandfather clause, then following it would be enough.
Everyone is commenting about the visor...this has nothing to do with the visor. He is wearing his helmet too high, it's not seated on his head. It's ready to fall off. This is what the penalty is for. Now of course we know he does this get the visor out of his own eyes sight. But he keeps the visor on for high sticks to touch it and draw more penalties (vs sticks that wouldn't have touched his face, but were close with no visor at all). Might as well get a few errand sticks to bump off the visor that isn't doing anything for/against you. Except until now. You don't see guys wearing their helmets like that without visors. Only guys with visors will let it sit high like that. All together, this is dumb on both sides.
The visor he is using is legal looking at the angle on replay the refs just wanna screw leafs over... Not gonna happen leafs be screwing teams over 7-2 often this year
Love seeing all the butthurt leafs fans. Its a rule in the NHL. I dont understand why Komarov gets rid of the visor anyway if he is going to wear it like that. Multiple times during the preseason the officials and the league warned him about this. Get over yourselves.
So wearing it slightly higher (although it seemed to be in a standard position) is a violation, but if he had taken it off all together it isn't? What the hell kinda rule is that!
Dinosaur NHL logic
So, he’s aloud to have no visor on, but he can’t have a visor on that isn’t fully protecting his face? What?
MajesticalMoose127 the way she goes.
learn to spell
Drew Walter i tryd too butt i forgote
like DDR before; 50 % of people watching the other half..
@@nos5822 i
Visornet
LOL
SPORTSNET Failed.
SPORTSNET This has got to end.
SPORTSNET LMFAO!!!!!!!!
They finally caught on.
dumbest penalty call I've ever seen
Its NHL rule, they were simply following it
Blame the league not the ref
You can see the helmet at 0:20 onward... Looks perfectly fine to me! I kinda feel like the ref just had something against Komarov... That or they simply wanted to make a statement that "this rule will now be enforced"...
BS the visor was up above his eyes. HE was TOLD/warned and went ahead and wore it that way. Damn homer.
@@nealm6764 ur probably a broke ass ref too
Isnt it funny that he is old enough to not have to even use a visor.
I dont get this rule. There are players who dont wear visors. If that is deemed unsafe then every nhl player should wear a visor. Is it an equipment violation for not having ear guards? Is it an equipment violation if your chin strap is too low? Cause thats unsafe. You know what，visors are unsafe too. That means the whole nhl should wear cages too. i understand player safety but this is a joke. You ever keep it consistent or let them do what they prefer.
What's more, Komarov is grandfathered and is eligible to play without a visor! So no visor would be perfectly good, but some visor is bad bad bad for some reason.
Is it an equipment violation for not having ear guards? hmmm yes.many industries you need to have the right protection equipment, if you dont, the insurance company can lawsuit your boss and you boss gonna have to pay instead of the insurance company.
In this case, if he gets a puck to the eye, the ref or the NHL or I don't know who, could be in trouble for not applying the rule. Welcome to the adult world ;)
Does the rule need to be change? Maybe, I don't know. That an other question really, but I think you see my point.
sam93931 You don't have to wear ear guards. There's been talks to remove cages from college because of concussions.
There's a rule that states that if a player wears a visor, it must cover his eyes
Cody McLeod doesn't wear a visor..
Komarov gets called for rare "illegal equipment" penaltynet
The worst rule I have seen in 10 years
ESPOSITO What was the one 10 years ago ?
From how it looks on the replay, Komarov seemed to be wearing his visor and helmet correctly when the penalty was called. Therefore, the penalty was called to make up for previous infractions and to send a message, making an example out of Komarov.
In the future, Komarov should wear his helmet and visor positioned properly at all times, or get rid of the visor altogether if it bothers him that much. The Bauer 4500 helmet model he wears is one of the lowest profile helmets available and fits very close on the head. Pushing that helmet up his forehead would effectively negate most of the protection that would be needed in the event of any kind of frontal impact.
but he doesnt even need to wear a helmet they even said so
I think the whole point was along the lines of, "If you're gonna wear a visor, you gotta wear it according to the rules.", because they even said that Komarov had been grandfathered in, which meant he didn't *have to* wear a visor in the first place, so either wear it right, or don't wear it at all. That's what I got out of that.
i didnt know there were any grandfathered players left
That's just bullshit, a player and a team shouldn't be penalised for that.
You should be penalized for your spelling.
max McKiernan You should be penalized for trying to be a grammar nazi and failing at it. "Penalized" and "penalised" are both correct.
I love that even the Jet's coach was confused, and Lou Lamoriello looked like he was about to murder someone
I'm confused? What's the violation? I thought visors were optional
Can't fathom having to see my boy Tyler Bertuzzi without a tilted visor
So Tim Peele aged pretty poorly huh? Anyone here after the "hot mic" incident?
This rule is insane. He’s grandfathered in. How does hagelin get away with it then?? This, the jersey tuck rule. These rules are so stupid turning the NHL into the NFL.
What’s wrong with his lid
Is it just or does it look very foggy?
You are better than Liane.
This is really an oddball call...
LEAVE LEO ALONE
uh, what just happened here? what's wrong with his helmet and visor?
Rule 9.7 states that IF you wear a visor it needs to cover your eyes. Komarov has done this all preseason and the league has told him MULTIPLE times to fix it, but never did.
That was then but last night TB scored a goal in an important game 6 and had no chin strap on . So that’s either an old rule or their different rules for different players
Some players are grandfathered in to older rules like Komarov was here. The problem in this video was that Komarov wasn't following the grandfather clause nor the new rule, so it was a penalty. In your example, if there is a grandfather clause, then following it would be enough.
Whatta hell?!
Jesse Puljujärvi says hold my beer
Everyone is commenting about the visor...this has nothing to do with the visor. He is wearing his helmet too high, it's not seated on his head. It's ready to fall off. This is what the penalty is for. Now of course we know he does this get the visor out of his own eyes sight. But he keeps the visor on for high sticks to touch it and draw more penalties (vs sticks that wouldn't have touched his face, but were close with no visor at all). Might as well get a few errand sticks to bump off the visor that isn't doing anything for/against you. Except until now.
You don't see guys wearing their helmets like that without visors. Only guys with visors will let it sit high like that. All together, this is dumb on both sides.
they said he doesnt even need to wear it because he was grandfathered in, so its even more dumb
0:40 i like how The coach got mad at Referee Tim Peel
The whole point is if you're going to wear the equipment use it how its intended. Its like cutting the thighs of your pants thats a violation.
The NHL is too damn technical nowadays.
If it's in the rulebook , then I guess it's a good call.... I mean even Babcock doesn't seem to argue , he's just like "oh ffs..."
What next, JVR gets a penalty for mouth guard hanging out?
what, it looks completely normal. wtf
Look at the face of the guy in the middle haha 0:18
The visor he is using is legal looking at the angle on replay the refs just wanna screw leafs over... Not gonna happen leafs be screwing teams over 7-2 often this year
The league showed GMs about this, and used Komarov as the example in the off-season. Ya big dummy!
RefNET
Just Tim Peel things.
Such a stupid call
I think they should all wear those bubble masks like in the mighty ducks :)
The nhl is gonna be ruined with these types of penalties
since hes allowed to, why doesnt he just take it off
Now 3 years later an answer. In finnish interview he said that he uses it for protection from sticks in corner scrambles.
Yea absolutely horrible call
That's petty...
🦓
Okay it's kind of funny.... Hard not to laugh
Wow that's just a dumb penalty call
Love seeing all the butthurt leafs fans. Its a rule in the NHL. I dont understand why Komarov gets rid of the visor anyway if he is going to wear it like that. Multiple times during the preseason the officials and the league warned him about this. Get over yourselves.
James Marcino Didn't know emo was still a thing. (You proved me wrong).
Mentalillnessnet
loh
Never to be called again......funny.......NOT!!!
Wtf?
stupid rule