@Elton Joel Tim is a leftist he has said it a bunch of times. A billion dollar corporation is most definitely facist, it's to destroy dissenting views. Hitler was elected as a socialist...
@E. R. My ideas? You know of me and my ideas? I'm pretty sure that I have not posted any of my ideas, but me commenting was definitely not courage it was just a simple comment. Courage is something completely different.
Tim: Here's proof that you're enforcing an ideology Vijaya: *Yes, thank you for that feedback. We're always learning and trying to understand different people's perspectives. Our intent is not to police ideology but behaviour. I hear your point of view and I will discuss it with my team.* Did tim just get a default email response in real life?
@DH DG Very cool buddy. Here's your cookie for being a great internet warrior, now go bug someone else. I don't really copy comments and this is an old one so I can assure you I have literally no idea what you're talking about.
Reid Hoffman is still active with an account in good standing despite him spending $100,000 using Russian bots to spread disinformation and it was reported in the New York Times.
Lee Gee They addressed it, though rather quickly. Around 1:45:00, Tim brings it up in a larger rant and Joe verified that Alex posted the video to defend himself.
Tim Pool "during covington this guy told his followers to go and kill these kids" Jack Dorsey " we have to look at that and context" am I missing something THE CONTEXT WAS CLEAR
There is no doubt Jack Dorsey is an intelligent thoughtful and sincere person, so when considering Vijaya Gadde's role as an attorney and a heavy handed ideologue, her firing by Musk was justified. Dorsey openly supported free speech and Musk taking over Twitter, which in hindsight and looking at this podcast is an interesting look in retrospect, and seriously doubt that Dorsey had much involvement in the decisions to silence those that went against the enforced ideology that the Twitter a-holes like Gadde were trying to propagate.
Here, power of Joe Rogan. He has done more with this particular podcast to address this issue, then all US Congress, or EU parliament farthers and hearings together. Hat down Joe, hat down.
5% Joe Rogan explaining things 20% Tim asking good questions 75% "I dont know, we definitely have to look at that, im not aware of that, lets look at the context"
Having Tim on was the such a good choice, his continuous pressure was exactly what we needed. The difference between the first one and this podcast was drastic.
Yeah, we needed him there so he could get dismantled over and over and over, first defending Milo then losing, then defending Alex Jones and losing again....What exactly did Tim do other than make conservative cry babies look even fucking dumber?
I've been growing my account with 7k followers for 5 years and they decide to suddenly ban me for "evading suspension" They gave me no explanation but the only reason they could have banned me is because I logged into my friend's account which was suspended months after i logged in, just because I logged into his account they've removed my connection to thousands of my followers. They clearly don't care about the user's experience or people being harassed because then they would have a real support system instead of kicking everyone off their platform.
@@rudidl19 just discovered this video. One of the most satisfying videos I've ever seen. Tim Pool was the voice of the people and utterly called out these liars, specifically Vijaya. When Tim Pool straight up said that "there is no question about it, Twitter has a left-leaning bias," Vijaya basically said, "I don't know what you're talking about we just ban people who have a pattern of targeted harassment." Fast forward to December 2022 when internal documents of Twitter provided by Elon Musk revealed that, per Matt Taibi. "Because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation, there were more channels, more ways to complain, open to the left (well, Democrats) than the right." Obviosuly true.
Did you come back again after it came to light that Russia has been funding Tim Pool, and Tim was turning a blind eye to the obvious red flags involved?
I am VERY proud of the work Tim Pool pulled off today. May he sleep well tonight knowing he did a service to humanity and spoke FOR me and so many others. God bless Tim Pool.
Pushed around how? They clearly said that they're still learning about this process. When has there every been a company like Twitter? If you really think about it, its actually difficult to manage 100mill+ ppl who constantly stream their thoughts and (sometimes) inappropriate actions (tweets)
Tim was hard but it wasn't helpful. To reiterate over and over the same instance doesn't help. Plus, throwing names and cases at them shows he came prepared, but what did he expect the outcome would be other than deflection by the opposite side? Thanks it didn't turn into a shouting match but the only takeaway from it was: companies using algorithms don't even know how they work anymore. That is the scary shit. To the matter itsself: clicks mean cash, controversy means clicks. Social media need controversy. If you don't like it, free country.....build your own (then neutral ...lol, or right leaning) platform.
Coming back and watching this after Elon bought twitter is gold. It's wild how they tried so hard to avoid the blatant fact that the enforcement of twitters policies are so one-sided, politically. And now look at them, squirming and crying over their new owner.
Great job Tim on owning these condescending elitists and telling them things they never hear in their liberal bubbles. They are so bias it is just gross...and the fact they act like they are not is insulting to anyone with a brain.
Who did he own?? There was literally a moment where he paused after a false assertion of UN charter and they all laughed at his dumbass 😂. The twitter folk are cool calm and collected while grunge photography major is all worked up and emotional.
@@javierharo285 agreed. Seems like he tried to "gotcha" them over n over n got worked up when they didn't agree with him or had a logical response . Felt like a 3 hr live triggered meme
@@joelav91 With how much she utterly dodged and deflected everything with an attitude that bounced between condescension and near-crying, I'm surprised he stayed as composed.
Bob D Tim Pool is clown. Just shut he fuck. It’s a private platform, they can do what they want. Just get off social media in the first place. Corny as fuck.
Doesn’t even have to be a “criticism” for twitter to consider it as an attack. If you state something biologically correct, which goes against Twitter and the user’s ideology and their feelings get hurt, it will be seen as an attack lol
*Alex Jones bursts into the room and rips off his shirt while roaring everyone watches in silence until he leaves they calmly return to their conversation* Joe: "That happens sometimes."
Back then, leftists were the ones who were anti-vax. There were massive measles outbreaks in California from people not vaccinating. Jenny McCarthy, spokesperson for the popular theory that MMR vaccines caused autism, was a freakin Playboy model. Not exactly the most conservative lady. Memory holed.
@Jay Arre Doesn't stop em from trying though. Don Lemon and his disavowing of rioters purely for poll numbers. It's nice when you can have their motivations out in the light.
They suspended the @ArticlesOfUnity page on twitter bcus a bunch of Biden supporters mass reporting it as Russian bots. Articles of Unity is a perfectly legal project designed by Bret Weinstein, to overthrow the 2 parties election and draft in better candidates from both left/right to lead in consensus. We’ve (Eric Weinstein) contacted Jack about its suspension and he’s done nothing but blow smoke and now we’re going on 2 weeks. Smh Yeah, wait till the legislation hits.. literally part of the problem. (Like on fb where they’re deleting some 3rd party ticket ads smh)
I too came back to this episode because of the Twitter files release, big thanks Joe! To be slightly fair, Jack and Vijay made it sound as if the company and its ideals were aware of their shortcomings with intention to better the platform. Sadly they didn’t follow their own words as we all know intent isn’t reality. SO grateful to those that make efforts to bring the REAL to the masses!
tbf? Are you a bot? Fairness would have been what they didnt do. They were actively lying, not "not following their words". You are perhaps the reason why they get away with it, attempt to perform more critical thinking in the future. Stop acting like your on the same playing field as them, you aren't and they dont consider you a human for your political views.
Around 49:20 she says that when Meghan Murphy said "men aren't women though" that was her second strike. Both Joe and Tim ask why that deserves a strike. She pauses and then keeps talking without addressing how that counts as a strike. They know they are wrong but have no way of rationalizing it.
Exactly. They are patently aware of why their practices are unethical, and there's definitely an agenda at at work they actively tried to downplay with excessive deflection and being deliberately vague about black and white points. All this did was reinforce -- very effectively ar that -- everyone's suspicions about Twitter. Vijaya is wayyy too confident about regulations not coming their way, I wouldn't be so sure. They're drawing the gaze of metaphorical Eye of Sauron so to speak.
bballa124 just watched that part and noticed the same thing. She’s isn’t actually interested in actual discussion. She’s uses the typical therapist approach of sure that is the way you feel, I understand but....
For real @ 1:07:00 Tim Pool begins to crystal ball ...regulation will come. And then the government will regulate our speech on yt, twitter and the like. "Back in my day, we were allowed to be individuals."
How can she be wrong? All her positions and arguments are correct and inclusivity/positivity oriented, and she takes no "harmful" positions on anything. Therefore, anybody that has differing opinions/convictions are harmful. Duh!!! /s ofc
Fledgling Bodhisatva it was so funny they brought these tweets with them to try and justify the banning of people but the second they are even slight pushed they have no explanations.
"Antifa" - not centralized so nothing could be done "Learn to code" - totally bannable (I guess the center of this "targeted harassment" was at Obama's code.org)
She's a good dancer. She never answered questions directly when she knew she was wrong. She danced around and did that condescending smirk. You know, like a lawyer ;)
Man, 500 likes. I think you guys are confusing talking fast, getting heated, frequently changing the subject, interrupting everyone and machine gunning out questions for making good points. She's looking for help because he's a terrible communicator, not because his arguments are so good. I agree with some of his viewpoints but he did an awful job of having a productive conversation
Dude she really didn't get rolled She answered every question and took every criticism well , she even admitted at times that Dim Tool had a point about them having a liberal bias
@@SolarPlayer lmao dude literally just had to talk fast and everybody acting like he put everybody to shame with his reason and logic and amazing debate skills.
I guess lots of people knew who Tim was before he was on JRE but I didn't, and after this, he is now one of the top voices in media I'm paying attention to. I know I can't be the only one.
yeah youre totally right. For me i found him shortly before he blew up like this but yeah hes now one of main main sources of news analysis@@jessemcgrady
Not only that, but Jack wasn't confident enough in his own intellect that he required a helper be present during the "debate" so he wouldn't look too stupid.
Chunky Feathers she spoke a lot but didn't really answer anything. She spent this entire 3 1/2 hours gaslighting and excusing the anti American tyranny Twitter is engaged in.
Joe Rogan bringing back Jack along with Tim is a testament to how open and earnest he has been with this podcast. This episode happening itself is a big victory for new media.
True..ish. This was a direct results of an overwhelmingly amount of Rogans fan base blasting him for letting Jack off easy the last time. This podcast is a direct result the response from the fans. But still good on him for doing it.
The last minute of this podcast is why I love Tim. When the cameras were off she asked Tim to disclose his sources and he REFUSED. Journalistic integrity is alive, and it’s name is Tim Pool
I have watched Tim's channel before but not as much as Joe's channel. What was apparent to my simple uneducated mind is that this would have been a very different episode without Tim there. He came with facts and specifics and did an outstanding job holding their feet to the fire. Kudos to Tim.
Tim is a beast and he’s very much objective, calls it as he sees it.. which is why he is by far my favorite and highly underrated podcaster.. no offense mr. Rogan, your 2nd place😜
He whines and complains for 2 hours that he and his ilk should be able to be hateful asshats and not face any consequences. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences
@@pekachu9257 That doesn't actually invalidate everything he said. Joe Rogan is perfect at what he calls "being reasonable". Just because "he and his ilk" are asshats doesn't mean people can be asshats to him on the same platform without being subjected to the same consequences. Regardless of what he has done beforehand.
@@pekachu9257 "Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences" Depends on what consequences one is talking about. If stating a political opinion on twitter under your personal name, and then you are singled out harassed doxxed and lose your job, due to a hate mob, then yes, I do think you should be free from that. Whether left or right.
@@ubelperez476 This is true, but a professional takes classes of speaking of ideas for example, so that they can speak to any audience without their jargon. I am IT, and this is a very useful tool when working with my clients. Funny enough, some clients are unable to step down from their jargon and corporate language... and they are professionals too. It is a tool that needs to be polished - this matter of speaking to people. It really sets professionals aside from just corporate. As a note, speaking is not even my strongest suit, but I know how important communicating a concept with its intended meaning, is.
They understand that from a PR perspective these types of unfounded, emotional complaints have absolutely no impact on their bottom line. Their resulting unwillingness to debate made this one of the most boring podcast episodes ever
Funny thing. She's either lying (highly probable) OR she's incompetent and doesn't know how their own systems work. Either way, she looks like a complete fool.
Tim: "but he said he wanted to kill all the kids" Lady and Jack: Yea but the context Joe: What about Milo getting banned? Lady: He posted fake tweets about someone and we decided the context was to threaten and harass them. Ottaaayyyy👌
“It’s more than obvious you’re clearly left bias...” “I don’t understand why you say that Tim? I think you are saying this intentionally but I don’t think it’s true...” ...... a year later and how many times have they blocked Trump and his affiliates???
@@Daddy-ko2jn not really man, if Trump does something to earn a ban then that's on him not Twitter. Even though his cronies wouldn't care and would call foul like liberals do.
you're joking right? he's writing about a thousand tweets a day . i'm not sure ..but about every second one of them includes an insult or something you shouldn't say on twitter, the internet or in general. if he wasn't the president / famous, his account would be looooong gone
Seriously. The fact that they avoided a definitive answer says it all. It's as if they were children in that moment, lying because they were scared to tell the truth. That said, if you DM and don't know they can read them, you're not terribly aware. It doesn't excuse this situation but I am just playing devil's advocate.
Indeed. They can read EVERYTHING. It reminds me of when certain admins in certain chatrooms would insist that they cannot read the private messages of their members when in reality the opposite is true. Admins on Twitter have access to all the private messages. They're not supposed to read them, sure, but they can if they want to.
@@Grokfyr Evidence? Twitter owns their source code which of course includes private messages. Do you think they coded in a way to block themselves from control over their own information?
@@Grokfyr There's footage of a head Twitter Engineer saying so in front of a hidden camera. You can watch it here th-cam.com/video/ULYI1uhK8g4/w-d-xo.html&feature=share
She lied about being able to see the DM's. Anyone thats ever been in IT knows there are multiple people in any company that can read ANYTHING that is ever written on a platform. I cannot believe she agreed to be on this forum when it's her goal not to tell the truth. Amazing interview. Amazingly frightening. Sorry, for the use of pronouns, but I live in reality.
She didn't lie - she was hesitant to say they could . - she literally said if you report it - we will review it. So those in the IT field know - you can access the data. She basically wants to protect the companies interests - and she doesn't want to alarm users.
Digamber Pradhan no she went around the question. She didn’t want to lie because she knows people would call her out on her bullshit. But still acted like you couldn’t
TAProductions They bring in a minority woman, basically because with their view of intersectionality, she cannot be attacked. She plays Dumb and she's good at it. Way to go Jack you fraud.
I’ve never seen people be so incredibly EVASIVE of their banning of certain viewpoints. My God... It’s stunning how they actually believe they aren’t being biased...
''We dont know what intersectional feminism means'' says the CEO who is enforcing gender studies policies via their HR department. What a fucking soy based weasel.
I've watched this many times now. Joe absolutely needs to run this back with Tim and Twitter. I guarantee the conversation will be one of the most watched, with a very different atmosphere and outcome.
For the love of God if he has Dim Fool on for that it'll be a complete shit show. Tim is not a journalist nor is he a Serious person. Virtually everything he says can be debunked with 3 mins of reading.
they way this lady said "again" followed by just talking in circles was some real mental gymnastics.. Is this what they teach people in IV league colleges?? That was fukcin crazy
Jack Dorsey says in the first 5 min we are mainly focused on elections then fast forward ted cruz asks Jack can u or do you have any involvement in elections. Jack said no under oath
Some1 needs to tweet it to ted. I dont have any social media besides TH-cam. I deleted all mine 5 years ago and thankful I did but some1 should def. It that portion out and send it to him to add to evidence at the hearings
@@nomanashraf1973 he means that it doesn't look good, at all, for the twitter folk. it's still an excellent debate/discussion, more revelant today than ever before, in many ways. and it makes Tim look great. he's very bright in this debate, and he very clearly got things right.
@@nomanashraf1973 just because you hate trump. Twitter are in this podcast trying to argue they don't have political bias/agendas, which the trump ban clearly proves they do.
11:45 “I personally believe that everyone has a voice and should be able to use it” -except my boss the ceo of the company sitting next to me who talked 15 minutes of the 4 hours 😂
100k+ viewers during the LIVE stream! Now it's officially proven what people want to have explained to them. Free speech is in danger people and "some" people really want it to end. Good job Tim Pool for standing up against anti-free speech human beings!
@@stevechinz I know of Patreon's demons. I didn't say Patreon patron though. I said patron because I don't know of another word that means one who supports monetarily on a regular basis.
A private company can do what they want. It's a free market. Just don't use Twitter, problem solved. I don't think it's right, but you can't have it both ways. It's either a free market or you regulate. JUST STOP USING SOCIAL MEDIA YOU ADDICTS
@Darth Mercur Not really, I reported a conversation between 3 dudes wishing for a violence to death against the Covington kids and they said it didn't violate their rules. It was pretty egregious
Darth Mercur I want to know why people like you are so blind to conservative censorship unfairly. Do you just enjoy pretending what you already know is all you need to know. Or do you hate conservatives so much you turn a blind eye to their unfair treatment? Cause the latter is why the country is divided. And Trump is ALWAYS the scape goat
Yep! Their policing mechanism is neither fair nor consistent. They’re becoming a victim of their own nearsightedness. Conservatives need to move en masse to Gab. Perhaps the advertising losses would then motivate them to fix the problems that their ideology has blinded them to.
She has stated on at least two different cases that XYZ broke their rules and though there were multiple occurences she states she wants to focus on the three that "allowed" them to ban this person. Then Tim or Joe points out that one or two of those three reasons don't seem like a reportable offense so she (and Jack) say well there were multiple instances and context matters. I hope they wake up this morning knowing that they looked completely incompetent throughout this podcast and only proved without any doubt the amount of one sided censorship that has taken place. I absolutely do not want Twitter to be government regulated and would much rather see another platform compete with them now that they have publicly stated their bias and disdain for the First Amendment and the idea of freedom of speech.
@@joshuar9560 I don't think that's the case. He engages on their answers several times. He just didn't think it was the right answer or self-aware enough or frankly just good enough. Given how things have gone in social media over even the last week or two, I'd say he was right. This podcast from three months ago seems almost quaint in how much optimism could still be summoned by the end of the podcast -- even by Tim. Things have gone downhill since to say the least.
@@joshuar9560 i think if anything the lady would just act as if he interrupted her, and say "can i finish". Then they qould juat basically skip his actual question
@@MtnDewWarrior But he was interrupting her quite regularly. She wasn't there to defend Twitter, so much as to provide details about the different cases in which he might be interested. The kind of details which he could not possibly know, but in which you would think he'd be interested. Yet he didn't show any interest at all in gaining new information from her. He just wanted to lay out his case against Twitter, and every time she tried to bring his focus back to the reason she was there- to provide quite specific information- he would redirect to the larger debate over Twitter's bias.
@Nom Nom left leaning accounts with around 70k followers were shut down. Watch the news from both sides next time before commenting stuff that required knowing this.
@@mostpassiveuser8904 only after the 2020 election, pre election there was a huge bias against right leaning conservative voices. Pre election Antifa and BLM were running rampant, organizing riots, calling for violence, all unchecked. But to simply bring up the idea of a rigged election in 2020 and you’re done. After Biden Harris got in they dumped all those leftovers like a bad date.
@@mostpassiveuser8904 i assumes you are joking. The bias is incredibly obvious. Say you want to call a conservative a nazi, sexist, and a racist. That's no problem. Say someone calls a person born with a dick a man. Thats ban worth. Not to mention stock discussions being shut down and the hunter biden story being shut down. All evidence of voter fraud that gets posted to social media results in a ban. When parler went against the narrative and allowed free speech they had their servers removed and were booted off the internet. 1984 is literally happening now and I don't think your jokes are funny at all.
Back after watching this originally. Tim Pool was right and so were we. Tim Pool schooled a top lawyer at a Big Tech company in real time because he had facts and experience that we all knew before. I heard she cried when Elon bought Twitter.
Not to mention the bullshit Jack and the other girl said about protecting races/genders from harassment. Anyone can go on twitter right now and type in "White People" or "Straight males" and see the viscous one sided hate/media articles. I spent 25 minutes searching "Black People" results and literally couldn't find a single negative comment. Liberals have made our society completely obsessed with skin color/their differences in general and wont ever stop.
DaddynHay to be fair i think its more complicated than them simply waking up tomorow and saying this rule and that rule should be changed, its most likely a longer process and discussion to determine the effects of certain changes and it’s a process we don’t even know anything about and not to mention they also have alot of factors and sides they most likely have to listen too so they can keep the company at an all around balance,
That was one of the most asinine answers I’ve ever heard and I was appalled by it. She lost whatever legitimacy I could have given her when she said that.
29:00 Joe: "In general, things lean far more left, would you agree?" Lawyer woman: "I don't know what that means"... what a productive response, that perfectly sums up this entire conversation in a nutshell
@Leoanna Sun 2 months...if they're so "proactive" maybe they would have SOMETHING done...not till 2020 is there going to be any changes, and if Trump wins again, its not going to be anything good....honestly, it won't be good either way. Twitter has the devils cock down their throat. Theres no hope for them other than suicide probably.
But that's what Jordan Peterson does too in debates when he's not sure what the frame of reference is. Better than say something stupid based on misunderstanding, I'm sure you'll agree.
@@nimbydimby but then they go on to talk about the platform leaning left later on, it would be excusable if they were honest but they were trying to avoid answering
bringing tim to play the prosecutor vs team twitter was the best move joe has made in a long time.
holy shit how do you people remember how to breathe?
lmao joe knew they would crap if he did it so he brought in a guy who could do but just better.
Elton Joel. That's a weird thing to say given the fact that Tim is a self-proclaimed lefty. (well, center left)
@Elton Joel Tim is a leftist he has said it a bunch of times. A billion dollar corporation is most definitely facist, it's to destroy dissenting views. Hitler was elected as a socialist...
Only because JR is too big of pussy to do it himself. No possible backlash for Joe. Pussy
Joe is providing the kind of genuinely open debate forum that mainstram media gave up on. You are doing the world a valuable service, Joe.
To get the record straight. After massive pressure from people with courage to stand up to this.
@@absoluttchamp courage to stand up to this? Trolling in comments or just making comments period in social media is now concidered courage? 🤔 Uhhh OK.
WHAT?? YOU INVITE A LIAR VAGINA ON SAYING ALEX BEAT UP A KID... WTF??? YOU LYING SNOT!
@@mandakenz4411 That was never stated by her and we all know it because its not in the video above this comment section
@E. R. My ideas? You know of me and my ideas? I'm pretty sure that I have not posted any of my ideas, but me commenting was definitely not courage it was just a simple comment. Courage is something completely different.
Tim: Here's proof that you're enforcing an ideology
Vijaya: *Yes, thank you for that feedback. We're always learning and trying to understand different people's perspectives. Our intent is not to police ideology but behaviour. I hear your point of view and I will discuss it with my team.*
Did tim just get a default email response in real life?
He'll probably get better response from Indian/Pakistani scammers
How can anyone sit there with a straight face and say that. I'm surprised Joe didn't kick them out.
She would be terrible on SAS: who dares wins, they'd see straight through her.
Npc response
@DH DG Very cool buddy. Here's your cookie for being a great internet warrior, now go bug someone else.
I don't really copy comments and this is an old one so I can assure you I have literally no idea what you're talking about.
I can't take enough satisfaction in the fact that Vijaya was fired and everyone sees the hypocrite she is.
It was a beautiful moment!
You are so right!
was she fired? why? because if she ...kind of questioned company's lack of attention toward anti left ideals... then maybe she wasn't aware of it.
if she was fired for admitting right views were always dismissed... then maybe she was fired wrongfully...
And then Trump won. Mic drop.
MSM said Alex Jones pushed the kid down. Alex posted the video to show it was not him. Context not valid here?
Surprised no-one really picked up on that in the studio.
Reid Hoffman is still active with an account in good standing despite him spending $100,000 using Russian bots to spread disinformation and it was reported in the New York Times.
Jack: "but you've got to look at THA CONTACST"
Good point.
Lee Gee They addressed it, though rather quickly. Around 1:45:00, Tim brings it up in a larger rant and Joe verified that Alex posted the video to defend himself.
Tim Pool "during covington this guy told his followers to go and kill these kids" Jack Dorsey " we have to look at that and context" am I missing something THE CONTEXT WAS CLEAR
Wait that's Jack on the podcast?!?!?!
@@joemcnulty6814 Yes, it is
@@joemcnulty6814 Yeah... I guess you missed the title.
@@joemcnulty6814 he was the one saying the word CONTEXT every sentance.
Man did they think they were really convincing everyone how fair they are lmao. Womp womp
Glad to see Jack Dorsey was invited to watch this debate
Theybare lying. They deleted my twitter account with no warning and no second chance. They are flat out lying.
Haha seriously
Promotionit Perhaps you’re just not looking at the entire context.
why would you say anything when you have counsel to say it for you
The psycho face they both have is really frightening. They are millionaires with the media power on their hands. Holly shit.
I'd like to see Tim, Jack and Joe back in the studio soon
There is no doubt Jack Dorsey is an intelligent thoughtful and sincere person, so when considering Vijaya Gadde's role as an attorney and a heavy handed ideologue, her firing by Musk was justified. Dorsey openly supported free speech and Musk taking over Twitter, which in hindsight and looking at this podcast is an interesting look in retrospect, and seriously doubt that Dorsey had much involvement in the decisions to silence those that went against the enforced ideology that the Twitter a-holes like Gadde were trying to propagate.
Jack, Joe and Elon
@@lykn6929 David Icke and Elon would be great. Will never happen.
Joe laughing at Alex Jones third tweet was classic
Brandon White time?
"That's hilarious"
@@rexislv6025 30 minutes or so and you get the full setup
@@rexislv6025 35:00
35:07
Here, power of Joe Rogan. He has done more with this particular podcast to address this issue, then all US Congress, or EU parliament farthers and hearings together. Hat down Joe, hat down.
Tss tss why not hats up tss tss
@@tonytomei1175 thats graduation
5% Joe Rogan explaining things
20% Tim asking good questions
75% "I dont know, we definitely have to look at that, im not aware of that, lets look at the context"
Or Joe making excuses...
Agreed, and typical lawyer BS
This 👍
lmao if i would have red your comment earlier it would of saved me 3 hours
And 100% to remember the name!
Tim Pool's I mean xD
this should have been two podcast one with tim pool and vijaya bickering and one where joe picks jack dorsey brain.
Just try to imagine this conversation taking place on CNN or Fox News in a 6 minute panel. Good riddance to the traditional media.
Bofa Deez lmao forreal
They should do the debates online. Kill the legacy media!
YESSS!
Until they find a reason to get Joe. The reason Joe works is because people are sick of CNN.
Big facts!
Vijaya : Context is everything
Jo: why did you ban Sargon?
Vijaya : He wanted to throw someone out of a helicopter
It really does seem to have shades of the Dankula situation mixed in, to me.
hahaha, I was saying we should throw people out of C-130s on FB, got multiple bans
@@zeikerd But we do it everyday and often into combat zones, wtf!
Jo
This better lead to a reversal of that obviously biased bigoted decision.
Having Tim on was the such a good choice, his continuous pressure was exactly what we needed. The difference between the first one and this podcast was drastic.
Yeah, we needed him there so he could get dismantled over and over and over, first defending Milo then losing, then defending Alex Jones and losing again....What exactly did Tim do other than make conservative cry babies look even fucking dumber?
I've been growing my account with 7k followers for 5 years and they decide to suddenly ban me for "evading suspension" They gave me no explanation but the only reason they could have banned me is because I logged into my friend's account which was suspended months after i logged in, just because I logged into his account they've removed my connection to thousands of my followers. They clearly don't care about the user's experience or people being harassed because then they would have a real support system instead of kicking everyone off their platform.
The biggest difference is that this video had a agenda, the last one was more of a free talk with Joe like he normally does with all his podcasts.
Agreed!
@@Audi007 3 against 1? What do you mean? In this podcast? Is math not your strong suit?
Fun to go back and listen to the lies, now uncovered in congressional testimony. Good job Tim Pool!
Example please :)
@@rudidl19 just discovered this video. One of the most satisfying videos I've ever seen. Tim Pool was the voice of the people and utterly called out these liars, specifically Vijaya.
When Tim Pool straight up said that "there is no question about it, Twitter has a left-leaning bias," Vijaya basically said, "I don't know what you're talking about we just ban people who have a pattern of targeted harassment."
Fast forward to December 2022 when internal documents of Twitter provided by Elon Musk revealed that, per Matt Taibi. "Because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation, there were more channels, more ways to complain, open to the left (well, Democrats) than the right."
Obviosuly true.
That's why I came back 😂
@@Jaji_35fast forward to now and old Timmy pool has been taking Russian money to spread lies and misinformation…
Did you come back again after it came to light that Russia has been funding Tim Pool, and Tim was turning a blind eye to the obvious red flags involved?
Got Damn Tim is not disappointing. We expected them to go hard, and dear lord, Tim went even harder! Major kudos for not being pushed around!
Tim was so fucking hard
I am VERY proud of the work Tim Pool pulled off today. May he sleep well tonight knowing he did a service to humanity and spoke FOR me and so many others. God bless Tim Pool.
Pushed around how? They clearly said that they're still learning about this process. When has there every been a company like Twitter? If you really think about it, its actually difficult to manage 100mill+ ppl who constantly stream their thoughts and (sometimes) inappropriate actions (tweets)
@@thephilosopher7173 Keep making excuses for bias and censorship
Tim was hard but it wasn't helpful. To reiterate over and over the same instance doesn't help. Plus, throwing names and cases at them shows he came prepared, but what did he expect the outcome would be other than deflection by the opposite side?
Thanks it didn't turn into a shouting match but the only takeaway from it was: companies using algorithms don't even know how they work anymore. That is the scary shit.
To the matter itsself: clicks mean cash, controversy means clicks. Social media need controversy. If you don't like it, free country.....build your own (then neutral ...lol, or right leaning) platform.
Coming back and watching this after Elon bought twitter is gold. It's wild how they tried so hard to avoid the blatant fact that the enforcement of twitters policies are so one-sided, politically. And now look at them, squirming and crying over their new owner.
Yeah lol...i just watched it again to relive it.. crazy right
Watch the project veritas leak of their call with her on it. These people are ideologs running a real business. They know it's all over now.
Was thinking the exact same thing
I know in watching it again now and like omg these people man.. peaceful protest had violence yet videos all over Twitter..
Sunlight Is the Best Disinfectant
"We found stuff from Alex Jones dating back to 2014 and took action based on that."
"Sarah Jeong had tweets from prior to 2015 so we ignored those".
Great catch! I didn't even make that connection the first listen. Thanks
Please time stamp that
I noticed this as well. The video is full of contradictions like this.
Devils advocate, "But looking at the latest 3 violations of the 3 strikes rule" idk how long those were spread out.
Aaaand...Lookie here: Body Language ghost weighed in, too!
Body Language: Joe Rogan, Timcast, Jack Dorsey of Twitter
Boy, this aged well!
It will be in the history books some day.
Great job Tim on owning these condescending elitists and telling them things they never hear in their liberal bubbles. They are so bias it is just gross...and the fact they act like they are not is insulting to anyone with a brain.
That's the spooky part. They're biased and can't see it.
Who did he own?? There was literally a moment where he paused after a false assertion of UN charter and they all laughed at his dumbass 😂. The twitter folk are cool calm and collected while grunge photography major is all worked up and emotional.
@@javierharo285 agreed. Seems like he tried to "gotcha" them over n over n got worked up when they didn't agree with him or had a logical response .
Felt like a 3 hr live triggered meme
Please, their bubble is anything but liberal.
@@joelav91 With how much she utterly dodged and deflected everything with an attitude that bounced between condescension and near-crying, I'm surprised he stayed as composed.
Jack: I brought my “specialist”
Jo: Me too
😂👏
#GOLD!!!
Im dying😂
Sargon would be better. Or Milo. Tim is scattershot and shallow.
Martin Macdonald give me a single reason why that’s true.
Joe and Tim just pulled the “good cop/bad cop” of the century💯
Bro I thought I was the only one that peeped it
💀💀💀
Best comment on this video and absolutely accurate!
Bob D Tim Pool is clown. Just shut he fuck. It’s a private platform, they can do what they want. Just get off social media in the first place. Corny as fuck.
bishes be mad blood clot pussiole
This podcast never gets old
Back in the day if you got offended first you lost
Yes!
John Demchuk
The good ol troll games lol!
This offends me
Ahh good ol Gay Chicken🐔🐔🐔
All while the right becomes hyper victims, crying about the plight of the straight white male..
Criticism which hurts feelings is not violence and is not an attack.
Doesn’t even have to be a “criticism” for twitter to consider it as an attack. If you state something biologically correct, which goes against Twitter and the user’s ideology and their feelings get hurt, it will be seen as an attack lol
@@RainSunRain gender isn't biological. Sex is.
@@rogueantful what?
@ what?
*Alex Jones bursts into the room and rips off his shirt while roaring
everyone watches in silence until he leaves
they calmly return to their conversation*
Joe: "That happens sometimes."
You should write for family guy.
The is actually made me burst out laughing! 😆
@@christopherdickinson4291 whaat? And make family guy funny again? Impossible!
XD
Absolute Gold! ✌
😂😂😂😂 top comment!!
Joe should try to get them back on and ask them to account for their lies. It would be Joe's best ever!!
It would be amazing!
A true warrior never visits the graves of slain enemies, he takes their memories to his.
@@mikedeni4512 But Twitter was alive and continued to discriminate politically for years until Elon bought the company
"Would you guys restrict someone for sharing false information about vaccines."
"That is not a violation of Twitter's rules."
Lmao. Holy shit.
Aged like milk in the Sahara
Back then, leftists were the ones who were anti-vax. There were massive measles outbreaks in California from people not vaccinating. Jenny McCarthy, spokesperson for the popular theory that MMR vaccines caused autism, was a freakin Playboy model. Not exactly the most conservative lady.
Memory holed.
I about shit myself when I heard those hacks say that.
Would you guys ban the literal president of the United States...? Lol
Lol
Tim: If you don't face this problem you are facing legislation.
He called it.
@Jay Arre Doesn't stop em from trying though. Don Lemon and his disavowing of rioters purely for poll numbers. It's nice when you can have their motivations out in the light.
@@NaptownSubaru And still they're blaming all of this on Trump though
They suspended the @ArticlesOfUnity page on twitter bcus a bunch of Biden supporters mass reporting it as Russian bots.
Articles of Unity is a perfectly legal project designed by Bret Weinstein, to overthrow the 2 parties election and draft in better candidates from both left/right to lead in consensus.
We’ve (Eric Weinstein) contacted Jack about its suspension and he’s done nothing but blow smoke and now we’re going on 2 weeks. Smh
Yeah, wait till the legislation hits.. literally part of the problem.
(Like on fb where they’re deleting some 3rd party ticket ads smh)
Was really hoping Alex would jump outta 11th dimension and savage these fools.
M A LMAO 🤣 🤣🤣
This comment killed me omg. The mental picture of alex jones hiding in the next dimension waiting for his time to strike... Hahhahahaa
I haven’t actually laughed out loud for a while.
We keep baby comfortable, Jack.
Bahahaha
I too came back to this episode because of the Twitter files release, big thanks Joe! To be slightly fair, Jack and Vijay made it sound as if the company and its ideals were aware of their shortcomings with intention to better the platform. Sadly they didn’t follow their own words as we all know intent isn’t reality. SO grateful to those that make efforts to bring the REAL to the masses!
tbf? Are you a bot? Fairness would have been what they didnt do. They were actively lying, not "not following their words". You are perhaps the reason why they get away with it, attempt to perform more critical thinking in the future. Stop acting like your on the same playing field as them, you aren't and they dont consider you a human for your political views.
Around 49:20 she says that when Meghan Murphy said "men aren't women though" that was her second strike. Both Joe and Tim ask why that deserves a strike. She pauses and then keeps talking without addressing how that counts as a strike. They know they are wrong but have no way of rationalizing it.
cowards
Exactly. They are patently aware of why their practices are unethical, and there's definitely an agenda at at work they actively tried to downplay with excessive deflection and being deliberately vague about black and white points. All this did was reinforce -- very effectively ar that -- everyone's suspicions about Twitter. Vijaya is wayyy too confident about regulations not coming their way, I wouldn't be so sure. They're drawing the gaze of metaphorical Eye of Sauron so to speak.
bballa124 just watched that part and noticed the same thing. She’s isn’t actually interested in actual discussion. She’s uses the typical therapist approach of sure that is the way you feel, I understand but....
@leah rose You lasted that long? I detested her after half an hour. :-)
This lady reminds me of a customer service rep that can’t do anything for you
I'd like to cancel my AOL account.
th-cam.com/video/v6_p5V4EGXI/w-d-xo.html
reminds me of ubisoft support. they make good games, but there a shitty company
brunojake099 ... that would be like handing over the asylum to the inmates ... 😏
brunojake099 YEEEEEEEEES!! That’s the best way to put it! She’s so non-helpful and doesn’t hear a single thing you say!
“Yes sir, I understand, I’d be upset too! I totally understand and there’s nothing I can do....”
This didn't age well for Twitter.
@Babu Dahkl as in, Twitter has showed that they are in fact fascists with their own agenda and give no fucks about being a platform? I agree.
Can you explain pls?
For real @ 1:07:00 Tim Pool begins to crystal ball ...regulation will come. And then the government will regulate our speech on yt, twitter and the like.
"Back in my day, we were allowed to be individuals."
Hahah look at the Chinese photoshopped photo ahah
Lying doesn’t ever age well
Vijaya with the calm arrogance..
How can she be wrong? All her positions and arguments are correct and inclusivity/positivity oriented, and she takes no "harmful" positions on anything. Therefore, anybody that has differing opinions/convictions are harmful. Duh!!!
/s ofc
Twitter is contentious because tweets of opposition political parties are highly filtered.
Company Man to the fullest.
‘Learn to Code’ = targeted harassment
‘Covington Kids’ = meh
Fledgling Bodhisatva it was so funny they brought these tweets with them to try and justify the banning of people but the second they are even slight pushed they have no explanations.
@@chrisg4908I guess they are like the ppl in school who half-assed a presentation
"Antifa" - not centralized so nothing could be done
"Learn to code" - totally bannable (I guess the center of this "targeted harassment" was at Obama's code.org)
Tim pool drilled these clowns the way joe should have to begin with.
Thank you for your feedback.
She's a good dancer. She never answered questions directly when she knew she was wrong. She danced around and did that condescending smirk. You know, like a lawyer ;)
That’s what any demoncrat does best!
I thought it was a woman thing...🤔
Guaranteed she has a law degree. I could tell right off the bat how she was gonna be.
It’s not a democrat thing, it’s not a woman thing… it’s a piece of shit thing.
@@charlesincharge1245 you are beyond based my friend
I like how when she talks she looks at joe like “please chime in and help” and joe is just like “nope imma let Tim keep rolling you”
A whole speech to beat right back to the starting point without saying anything lmaoo but she can get it though for sure
Haha I noticed that. She knows not to even look Tim’s way
Man, 500 likes. I think you guys are confusing talking fast, getting heated, frequently changing the subject, interrupting everyone and machine gunning out questions for making good points. She's looking for help because he's a terrible communicator, not because his arguments are so good. I agree with some of his viewpoints but he did an awful job of having a productive conversation
Dude she really didn't get rolled
She answered every question and took every criticism well , she even admitted at times that Dim Tool had a point about them having a liberal bias
@@SolarPlayer lmao dude literally just had to talk fast and everybody acting like he put everybody to shame with his reason and logic and amazing debate skills.
How Jack Dorsey evaded going to jail is a miracle. He should be thankful every day. He’s not in jail cell.
Only 14 minutes in and Tim is not having it. I'm loving this
Even 9 minutes in he does it
@Danny D hahahaha that's the funniest joke I have heard all day bro
I guess lots of people knew who Tim was before he was on JRE but I didn't, and after this, he is now one of the top voices in media I'm paying attention to. I know I can't be the only one.
Its because he's a snowflake.
yeah youre totally right. For me i found him shortly before he blew up like this but yeah hes now one of main main sources of news analysis@@jessemcgrady
Joe: "Do you guys have access to people's DM's"?
Vejina: "I don't know, I don't think so"
biggest lie right there
There is no possible way that they don't
“It was an accident” this might be a bigger lie
Her name is Vijaya though.
I read that as "Do you guys have access to people's DMT?", it sounded like something Joe Mama would say.
😂😂😂😂vejina wtf
So basically in the first one he argued that Twitter isn't biased, and in this one they defended the reasons why they are biased
He had his foreign lawyer with him this time.
Not only that, but Jack wasn't confident enough in his own intellect that he required a helper be present during the "debate" so he wouldn't look too stupid.
@Chunky Feathers "You disagree with me?!?! You're an incel and LITERALLY Hitler." 😂😂😂 you're so cute bud
Chunky Feathers she spoke a lot but didn't really answer anything. She spent this entire 3 1/2 hours gaslighting and excusing the anti American tyranny Twitter is engaged in.
@@djhenyo
Consumers are stupid and continue to fail over and over again to understand that a company will do what makes the most money.
I bet this lady enjoyed the power of being able to ban a united states president glad she was fired justice was served
Yep, now she can go back to phone scams and sh1tt1ng on the street.
There as no justice served, she did election interference and nothing happened to her.
thank you for reminding me that Twitter tried to ban a presidential nominee. So crazy
Joe Rogan bringing back Jack along with Tim is a testament to how open and earnest he has been with this podcast.
This episode happening itself is a big victory for new media.
True..ish. This was a direct results of an overwhelmingly amount of Rogans fan base blasting him for letting Jack off easy the last time. This podcast is a direct result the response from the fans. But still good on him for doing it.
All American Jedi you’re completely right my friend, he’s still had to do more damage control with him from the first interview.
are you kidding me he hid behind his fucking lawyer.... pathetic
They came in so hard. Jack had to bring the legal dept
Correction, he had Jack back WITH a lawyer to cover his ass.
This aged like fine wine 🍷.
Modern day book burning
Ooh California just banned To Kill A Mockingbird, Huck Finn, and more. Book burnings coming soon.
yup
You should come up with more original comments
Came to say the same thing, especially after the elections.
No need to burn the books when you can just harass the author into not writing it in the first place.
The last minute of this podcast is why I love Tim. When the cameras were off she asked Tim to disclose his sources and he REFUSED. Journalistic integrity is alive, and it’s name is Tim Pool
That part at the end was pure gold
I have watched Tim's channel before but not as much as Joe's channel. What was apparent to my simple uneducated mind is that this would have been a very different episode without Tim there. He came with facts and specifics and did an outstanding job holding their feet to the fire. Kudos to Tim.
Tim is a beast and he’s very much objective, calls it as he sees it.. which is why he is by far my favorite and highly underrated podcaster.. no offense mr. Rogan, your 2nd place😜
Damn, thanks for pointing that out.
I respect him on a different level
Integrity w Tim pool bull shit.bring the facts
Bye Vijaya. No one else is confused about why you were fired. Let that sink in.
This podcast was made so much better with Tim.
was it dough
For sure
Nahh he’s an idiot
They should do this same podcast again now…
Tim would stare kill Jack 😆
They wouldn't dare now.
Who wold even belive Jack now? He is a Hypokrit
They would NEVER do this again. They lied over and over. Now we know, and Tim was just too kind. Joe definitely asked him to 'be cool'.
@@barttcounts8456 3:18:39 watch these last 6 minutes on repeat, as many times as it takes to bring you back to reality
Tim Pool makes some VERY good points. I'm glad he was on there to express his point.
He whines and complains for 2 hours that he and his ilk should be able to be hateful asshats and not face any consequences.
Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences
@@pekachu9257 That doesn't actually invalidate everything he said. Joe Rogan is perfect at what he calls "being reasonable". Just because "he and his ilk" are asshats doesn't mean people can be asshats to him on the same platform without being subjected to the same consequences. Regardless of what he has done beforehand.
He’s the only one making points, the Twitter filth just deflected & obfuscated everything, they are a Globalist gate keeper.
@@pekachu9257 "Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences"
Depends on what consequences one is talking about. If stating a political opinion on twitter under your personal name, and then you are singled out harassed doxxed and lose your job, due to a hate mob, then yes, I do think you should be free from that. Whether left or right.
Peka chu and his ilk should face consequences for his inflammatory, hateful rhetoric.
This whole podcast turned into a “professional lying tutorial” since the twitter files!
I appreciate Jack and Vijaya coming on to shed some light on these issues, but I swear the level of corporate-speak drivel is almost too much to bear.
They’re just professional unlike Tim Pool
@@ubelperez476 So professional to you is corporate speak drivel that doesn't answer any questions?
@@ubelperez476 This is true, but a professional takes classes of speaking of ideas for example, so that they can speak to any audience without their jargon. I am IT, and this is a very useful tool when working with my clients. Funny enough, some clients are unable to step down from their jargon and corporate language... and they are professionals too. It is a tool that needs to be polished - this matter of speaking to people. It really sets professionals aside from just corporate.
As a note, speaking is not even my strongest suit, but I know how important communicating a concept with its intended meaning, is.
Jeffrey Herring they didn’t say anything besides they are a biased platform
They understand that from a PR perspective these types of unfounded, emotional complaints have absolutely no impact on their bottom line. Their resulting unwillingness to debate made this one of the most boring podcast episodes ever
"Can private dms be read?"
"I... don't think so."
Yeaaaah. So convincing.
Lied through their teeth!
There's a reason they call them DMs and not PMs, they wanted them to seem like PMs but not actually have the P
SYSTEM ERROR
Nailed it. Loop holed that bitch with a play on words.
@@system-error They took away the P and gave everyone the D pretty much.
Funny thing. She's either lying (highly probable) OR she's incompetent and doesn't know how their own systems work. Either way, she looks like a complete fool.
Tim has courage, and isn’t afraid of these powerful fools. Thanks for standing up to them, sincerely an average person.
@Captain Obvious No u
This episode, 1, 2 or 5 years later, is just art.
Tim: "but he said he wanted to kill all the kids"
Lady and Jack: Yea but the context
Joe: What about Milo getting banned?
Lady: He posted fake tweets about someone and we decided the context was to threaten and harass them.
Ottaaayyyy👌
Lmao
Milo was a spokesman for many racists
@@hmmm2357 are you jewish?
Exactly!
“It’s more than obvious you’re clearly left bias...”
“I don’t understand why you say that Tim? I think you are saying this intentionally but I don’t think it’s true...”
...... a year later and how many times have they blocked Trump and his affiliates???
trumps still on twitter
@zorth42 probably because it’d be the most blatant form of twitter being biased, when they try to say they’re not. They censor some of his tweets tho
@@Daddy-ko2jn not really man, if Trump does something to earn a ban then that's on him not Twitter. Even though his cronies wouldn't care and would call foul like liberals do.
Trump can still brake the rules though.
you're joking right? he's writing about a thousand tweets a day . i'm not sure ..but about every second one of them includes an insult or something you shouldn't say on twitter, the internet or in general. if he wasn't the president / famous, his account would be looooong gone
Tim you an amazing young man. Thank you for not dropping the ball.
@Craft9841 proof?
Source? Your ass?
hes also like 32
@@Sandstonequartz32 is a young man.
It's so satisfying to watch how perfect those headphones fit Tim's head.😂
"I am not sure if we can read private messages"
Seriously. The fact that they avoided a definitive answer says it all. It's as if they were children in that moment, lying because they were scared to tell the truth. That said, if you DM and don't know they can read them, you're not terribly aware. It doesn't excuse this situation but I am just playing devil's advocate.
Indeed. They can read EVERYTHING. It reminds me of when certain admins in certain chatrooms would insist that they cannot read the private messages of their members when in reality the opposite is true. Admins on Twitter have access to all the private messages. They're not supposed to read them, sure, but they can if they want to.
@@billroasts6701 If this is a fact, you surely could provide evidence to back up that claim ?
@@Grokfyr Evidence? Twitter owns their source code which of course includes private messages. Do you think they coded in a way to block themselves from control over their own information?
@@Grokfyr There's footage of a head Twitter Engineer saying so in front of a hidden camera. You can watch it here th-cam.com/video/ULYI1uhK8g4/w-d-xo.html&feature=share
She lied about being able to see the DM's. Anyone thats ever been in IT knows there are multiple people in any company that can read ANYTHING that is ever written on a platform. I cannot believe she agreed to be on this forum when it's her goal not to tell the truth. Amazing interview. Amazingly frightening. Sorry, for the use of pronouns, but I live in reality.
Bingo... My jaw dropped a little at that moment... Bitch You expect people to believe what you're saying?
She didn't lie - she was hesitant to say they could . - she literally said if you report it - we will review it.
So those in the IT field know - you can access the data.
She basically wants to protect the companies interests - and she doesn't want to alarm users.
Digamber Pradhan no she went around the question. She didn’t want to lie because she knows people would call her out on her bullshit. But still acted like you couldn’t
@Bishop GrandFoo yeah except for iMessage everything can be reviewed really. Instagram, Facebook all.of it.
A year later, the truth was revealed and Tim was completely right.
More than we could ever imagine
It was obvious back then too.
Tim is ahead of the curve!
@@PicassoPP too ahead. The curve went down to zero just like his brain.
230 needs to go and these creeps need to be taken to the cleaners...only thing that takes is money
2024... This is the best time to watch this 😂🤣😂😅
After Trump wins is just insane.
Joe: "Would you in general say Twitter leans more left?"
Lawyer lady: "i dont know what that means"
HAHHAHA
It's the equivalent of "Wipe them? Like with a cloth?"
@@Arcantropolo Or CNN saying the servers weren't actually washed with acid. (In reference to bleachbit and "acid-washing")
😆
TAProductions
They bring in a minority woman, basically because with their view of intersectionality, she cannot be attacked. She plays Dumb and she's good at it. Way to go Jack you fraud.
What DOES it mean? The American definition of Left and Right is utterly warped compared to other countries view. It doesn't really make sense...
I’ve never seen people be so incredibly EVASIVE of their banning of certain viewpoints. My God... It’s stunning how they actually believe they aren’t being biased...
That's what narcissism does to a global social media powerhouse.
''We dont know what intersectional feminism means'' says the CEO who is enforcing gender studies policies via their HR department. What a fucking soy based weasel.
Jonathan Baumler they know, you can tell by their answers. People have been shouting the alarm for years.
We honestly need this same type of interview/podcast with youtube executives.
CozmicSaber's Opinions #TH-cam That would be a very interesting podcast. 👍🏼
They'd probably demonetize it.
DEFINITELY
every politician!
You about to get banned yo
much needed mr. Joe
Trump won you can rest easy now
I've watched this many times now. Joe absolutely needs to run this back with Tim and Twitter. I guarantee the conversation will be one of the most watched, with a very different atmosphere and outcome.
For the love of God if he has Dim Fool on for that it'll be a complete shit show. Tim is not a journalist nor is he a Serious person. Virtually everything he says can be debunked with 3 mins of reading.
The conversation today would not be the same
@@bearcudlybear He's no Brian Stelter or Rachel Maddow that's for sure.
they way this lady said "again" followed by just talking in circles was some real mental gymnastics..
Is this what they teach people in IV league colleges??
That was fukcin crazy
They wouldn’t come back again I don’t think. They’ve elected to go that way and show no remorse.
Jack Dorsey says in the first 5 min we are mainly focused on elections then fast forward ted cruz asks Jack can u or do you have any involvement in elections. Jack said no under oath
This is fucking scary man
Tweet it out to Ted
oh thats a solid point! I had not watched this episode until after the hearings. Ted Cruz brought the thunder in his questioning.
Some1 needs to tweet it to ted. I dont have any social media besides TH-cam. I deleted all mine 5 years ago and thankful I did but some1 should def. It that portion out and send it to him to add to evidence at the hearings
8:42 just in case you want to keep it handy 😂
Going into 2021, this interview really is not aging well for those two.
It Actually is
@@nomanashraf1973 he means that it doesn't look good, at all, for the twitter folk. it's still an excellent debate/discussion, more revelant today than ever before, in many ways.
and it makes Tim look great. he's very bright in this debate, and he very clearly got things right.
Like I said...holy foreshadowing!!!
@@jillybeangaming He also provided facts and supported them which the twitter exec could not.
@@nomanashraf1973 just because you hate trump. Twitter are in this podcast trying to argue they don't have political bias/agendas, which the trump ban clearly proves they do.
knowing everything we know about social media companies now this is basically satire
quote from jack -- "CNN reported Alex Jones tweets to us."
The account cnn. Doesnt matter. He and she both said. Its about reporting.
It wasnt cnn called him..
Timestamp pls
Great
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your RIGHT to say it. Democracy used to be about that...
FREEDOM!
As it should always be about that.
That’s so important
@Hyrum Wood its a republican democracy, there
*used
keyword
EPIC! Tim made sure to keep the heat turned on the whole time!
@Chunky Feathers Yeah I agree. I like Tim but he talks WAYY too much and says the same shit.
@Chunky Feathers L E A R N T O C O D E
Being a fucken HUGE ASSHOLE isn't putting the heat
Learn to code puss
Chunky Feathers is so triggered...haha you are everything that’s wrong with America and you’re gonna lose.
11:45 “I personally believe that everyone has a voice and should be able to use it” -except my boss the ceo of the company sitting next to me who talked 15 minutes of the 4 hours 😂
100k+ viewers during the LIVE stream! Now it's officially proven what people want to have explained to them. Free speech is in danger people and "some" people really want it to end. Good job Tim Pool for standing up against anti-free speech human beings!
Yes, there's a lot of alt right conservative morons that use TH-cam, its good that you pointed it out.
@@systematik fuck off of youtube and go back to reddit then
@JessicaG you should be banned from twitter for this. Hahahah
Thank you SO goddamn much for your huge balls Joe!!!
Tim...I was already a fan but you damn sure earned a patron today!
Honestly
Patreon is part of the problem, they banned alot of people like Sargon. use subscibestar
@@stevechinz I know of Patreon's demons. I didn't say Patreon patron though. I said patron because I don't know of another word that means one who supports monetarily on a regular basis.
Tim Pool is brutally blunt. A real journalist!
Dorsey and VIJAY aren't actually having a conversation . They are stone walling.
Didn't get his point through.
@@thatsrandom737 yea thats what you do to a talkative bitch
@@mostpassiveuser8904 @MostPassiveUser
@@swesleyc7 wow you're running a disinformation campaign against me.
This is a really good episode, and an excellent example of why long form format debate is much better than the old short format.❤
The way she's smirking through all of these serious accusations is kind of disrespectful IMO. Censorship is not a light topic.
She thinks Joe and Tim are dumber than her and yes her body language is extremely passive aggressive
Reminds me of Kamala
@@JohntehGman got those vibes too lmao
She's a fake bitch.
A private company can do what they want. It's a free market. Just don't use Twitter, problem solved. I don't think it's right, but you can't have it both ways. It's either a free market or you regulate. JUST STOP USING SOCIAL MEDIA YOU ADDICTS
"I'm happy to talk about all these details"
Translation: "I'm not going to address any of your concerns, let's talk about something else"
It was so frustrating
Hahahahahaha!!!!! Yes good point
They argue Tim is cherry picking examples, while openly cherry picking reasons to ban people
@Darth Mercur Not really, I reported a conversation between 3 dudes wishing for a violence to death against the Covington kids and they said it didn't violate their rules. It was pretty egregious
Darth Mercur I want to know why people like you are so blind to conservative censorship unfairly. Do you just enjoy pretending what you already know is all you need to know. Or do you hate conservatives so much you turn a blind eye to their unfair treatment? Cause the latter is why the country is divided. And Trump is ALWAYS the scape goat
Yep! Their policing mechanism is neither fair nor consistent. They’re becoming a victim of their own nearsightedness. Conservatives need to move en masse to Gab. Perhaps the advertising losses would then motivate them to fix the problems that their ideology has blinded them to.
Christian Baker exactly!
She has stated on at least two different cases that XYZ broke their rules and though there were multiple occurences she states she wants to focus on the three that "allowed" them to ban this person. Then Tim or Joe points out that one or two of those three reasons don't seem like a reportable offense so she (and Jack) say well there were multiple instances and context matters. I hope they wake up this morning knowing that they looked completely incompetent throughout this podcast and only proved without any doubt the amount of one sided censorship that has taken place. I absolutely do not want Twitter to be government regulated and would much rather see another platform compete with them now that they have publicly stated their bias and disdain for the First Amendment and the idea of freedom of speech.
Elon Musk while watching this:
"I'm gonna ruin this woman's whole career"
i applaud TIM POOL for not going easy on them!!!! this is a MUCH better podcast!!
yeah this is one of the best podcasts ive ever seen
But he never actually listened to them. He'd ask them a question, and then just wouldn't care about the answer.
@@joshuar9560 I don't think that's the case. He engages on their answers several times. He just didn't think it was the right answer or self-aware enough or frankly just good enough. Given how things have gone in social media over even the last week or two, I'd say he was right. This podcast from three months ago seems almost quaint in how much optimism could still be summoned by the end of the podcast -- even by Tim. Things have gone downhill since to say the least.
@@joshuar9560 i think if anything the lady would just act as if he interrupted her, and say "can i finish". Then they qould juat basically skip his actual question
@@MtnDewWarrior But he was interrupting her quite regularly.
She wasn't there to defend Twitter, so much as to provide details about the different cases in which he might be interested. The kind of details which he could not possibly know, but in which you would think he'd be interested.
Yet he didn't show any interest at all in gaining new information from her. He just wanted to lay out his case against Twitter, and every time she tried to bring his focus back to the reason she was there- to provide quite specific information- he would redirect to the larger debate over Twitter's bias.
This didn’t age well. Fast forward and they are silencing a lot of people.
Left and right. So what's your point?
@Nom Nom left leaning accounts with around 70k followers were shut down. Watch the news from both sides next time before commenting stuff that required knowing this.
@@mostpassiveuser8904 only after the 2020 election, pre election there was a huge bias against right leaning conservative voices. Pre election Antifa and BLM were running rampant, organizing riots, calling for violence, all unchecked. But to simply bring up the idea of a rigged election in 2020 and you’re done.
After Biden Harris got in they dumped all those leftovers like a bad date.
@@mostpassiveuser8904 i assumes you are joking. The bias is incredibly obvious. Say you want to call a conservative a nazi, sexist, and a racist. That's no problem. Say someone calls a person born with a dick a man. Thats ban worth. Not to mention stock discussions being shut down and the hunter biden story being shut down. All evidence of voter fraud that gets posted to social media results in a ban. When parler went against the narrative and allowed free speech they had their servers removed and were booted off the internet. 1984 is literally happening now and I don't think your jokes are funny at all.
@@mostpassiveuser8904 you are not the most ignorant person alive- but you better hope they do not die
Back after watching this originally. Tim Pool was right and so were we.
Tim Pool schooled a top lawyer at a Big Tech company in real time because he had facts and experience that we all knew before.
I heard she cried when Elon bought Twitter.
I hope she put in her notice too
She cried because she got bought and caught
We need to look at ‘top lawyer’ education with suspicion.
Lies. They were just lying. Hail Elon
Society puts lawyers at the top of the intellectual class.
Crazy too see how far this has come
‘Context and scale’ is my new excuse for everything.
This.
Half Code you run a massive social platform?
That’s exactly what their lawyers told them to do lol
You forgot "curated."
😂😂😂😂😂
Anyone that uses twitter regularly can tell they’re biased just pay attention to their promoted tweets and Moments
Not to mention the bullshit Jack and the other girl said about protecting races/genders from harassment. Anyone can go on twitter right now and type in "White People" or "Straight males" and see the viscous one sided hate/media articles. I spent 25 minutes searching "Black People" results and literally couldn't find a single negative comment. Liberals have made our society completely obsessed with skin color/their differences in general and wont ever stop.
exactly....
Lol that’s what I was thinking. I was like If I were there I’d say “Bitch, open twitter right now and tell me the first thing you see!”
The featured news when you hit the search button is far to the left of cnn home page
DaddynHay to be fair i think its more complicated than them simply waking up tomorow and saying this rule and that rule should be changed, its most likely a longer process and discussion to determine the effects of certain changes and it’s a process we don’t even know anything about and not to mention they also have alot of factors and sides they most likely have to listen too so they can keep the company at an all around balance,
Tim proves Vijaya is silencing people who quote facts she dislikes and shes like "thank you for the feedback" then continues to silence people.......
For the horde!!!
it was like zuckercuck in congress.
"ahhh congressman, i'll have to get back to you on that."..........
I watched some other interviews with her and you can tell she is a total leftie
It's ridiculous that episodes like this are just erased from Spotify. But thank you, Baby Jesus, for TH-cam keeping it up.
“In general things lean far more left, would you agree to that?” ....
...
“I don’t know what that means”
I was thinking the same thing. They know exactly what it means.
I abandoned that label because these days it has too much feel-good virtue signalling attached to it.
😂
That was one of the most asinine answers I’ve ever heard and I was appalled by it. She lost whatever legitimacy I could have given her when she said that.
They did admit to being leftist.
29:00 Joe: "In general, things lean far more left, would you agree?" Lawyer woman: "I don't know what that means"... what a productive response, that perfectly sums up this entire conversation in a nutshell
The question is too stupid to comprehend.
@@KipVaughan yet you understood it.
@@lornemalvo4492 ha pwnd
Kip Vaughan how is it a stupid question?
Holdem Agroin The definition of NPC.
Btw, to this date, nothing has changed at Twitter.
@Leoanna Sun 2 months...if they're so "proactive" maybe they would have SOMETHING done...not till 2020 is there going to be any changes, and if Trump wins again, its not going to be anything good....honestly, it won't be good either way. Twitter has the devils cock down their throat. Theres no hope for them other than suicide probably.
It's actually getting worse.
LIES! They started banning more conservatives.
It's a actually gotten worse.
I dare say its worse
Knowing what we know now, this podcast hits a little different.
29:05
Joe: “In general things lean far more left, would you agree with that?”
Vijaya: “I don’t know what that means”
Classic!
Matthew Chandler classic ult left “I’m confused” deflection because the truth is so acid to them.
Later they talk about it like they understand
But that's what Jordan Peterson does too in debates when he's not sure what the frame of reference is. Better than say something stupid based on misunderstanding, I'm sure you'll agree.
@@nimbydimby but then they go on to talk about the platform leaning left later on, it would be excusable if they were honest but they were trying to avoid answering
Twitter: We take Doxxing very seriously.
Skai Jackson: Doxes multiple people Twitter:😴
I was just gonna comment that 😂
Are you reporting her posts?
Kathy Griffin called for the doxxing of kids. Still not banned.
Doxes the wrong people
But remember, double standards are very popular among the left leaning. I.E. you can be hateful and racist as long as it's toward white dudes.
Watching again in 2022. The lies these people told are insane. Carry on.
Never expected to get caught. Truly astounding....
Man I watch this all the time
every time I watch this it makes me so happy to be reminded that she is now crying, as this will only get worse for her
Lies lies lies
@@WUILBERTOGO no its very very very true
Watching this in 2024, the amount of lies from these Twitter execs was incredible.