@@MonicaLabbao_littlemonicat Yeah! Long before the Reformers showed up, the Catholic Church was already being called “the devil’s harlot,” and Catholics, “servants of Antichrist”: Accordingly, by Montanists, Catholics were called “the carnal;” by Novatians, “the apostates;” by Valentinians, “the worldly;” by Manichees, “the simple;” by Aërians, “the ancient;” by Apollinarians, “the man-worshippers;” by Origenists, “the flesh-lovers,” and “the slimy;” by the Nestorians, “Egyptians;” by Monophysites, the “Chalcedonians;” by Donatists, “the traitors,” and “the sinners,” and “servants of Antichrist;” and St. Peter’s chair, “the seat of pestilence;” and by the Luciferians, the Church was called “a brothel,” “the devil’s harlot,” and “synagogue of Satan.” These groups were the opponents of the Church Fathers and councils who gave us the Nicene, Apostles’, and Athanasian Creeds. Some of these movements existed for centuries, but they finally dissolved.
@MonicaLabbao_littlemonicat The roman catholic cult may try to exterminate true christianity, but Christ will one day come back and the catholic church will not accept Him...just like the Pharisees did not accept Christ.
Well, sorry. The Gates of Hell DID prevail against the Catholic church. Like Martin Luther said, "I am much afraid that the universities will prove to be the very gates of hell unless they diligently labor in explaining the Holy Scriptures, and engraving them in the hearts of youth. I advise no one to place his child where the Scriptures do not reign paramount. Every institution in which men are not unceasingly occupied with the word of God must become corrupt." That discribes the Catholic church. He also said,"If there is a hell, Rome is built over it: it is an abyss whence issues every kind of sin."
They almost converted all of Japan to Christianity but then Queen Elizabeth I of England lied to the Shogun and told him that the Catholics are a threat. All Christians were brutally persecuted and murdered in Japan because of the corrupt and egoistic protestants
So, what is that supposed to mean? That the Papacy is fine now with Protestants? Nonsense!! How many times throughout the centuries has the Papacy lied to and deceived the Protestants into believing such garbage. Example: The Saint Bartholomew Massacre.
@@JewelsofTruthfake news didn't start with CNN and MSNBC. It started with Dutch Protestants and the Black Legend. Much of what you have been taught about Catholicism and protestantism is false. But what we can ignore is the evidence of historical facts that remain today. For instance, All of the Protestant countries founded in the Americas are nearly entirely white and black, with very few natives left. Yet almost all of the Catholic countries are now majority natives, with very few white or black people. So how did this happen if the Catholics were the genocidal ones ? After all, Protestants claim Catholics came and committed mass genocide, yet the only ones that seem to have wiped out the natives or the Protestants, while the Catholic countries have a vast native majority now. Protestant propaganda claimed Catholics were the genocide to once, but in reality it was actually the Protestants. Much of Catholic va Protestant history was actually twisted in this same fashion. For instance, Protestants killed far more Catholics than vice versa, but the Black Legend propaganda twisted it into reverse. Likewise, Protestants had far more military involvement in spreading their beliefs than Catholics had.
@@JewelsofTruthFake news didn't start with CNN and MSNBC. It started with Protestants and the Black Legend. Much of what you have been taught about Catholicism vs Protestantism is historically false. But what we can't ignore is the evidence of historical facts that remain today. For instance, all of the Protestant countries founded in the Americas are nearly entirely white and black, with very few natives left. Yet almost all of the Catholic countries are now majority natives, with very few white or black people. So how did this happen if the Catholics were the genocidal ones? After all, Protestants claim Catholics came and committed mass genocide, yet the only ones that seem to have wiped out the natives are the Protestants, while the Catholic countries have always had a vast native majority. Protestant propaganda claimed Catholics were the genocidal ones, but in reality it was actually the Protestants. Much of Catholic vs Protestant history was actually twisted in this same fashion. For instance, Protestants killed far more Catholics than vice versa, but the Black Legend propaganda twisted it into reverse. Likewise, Protestants had far more military involvement in spreading their beliefs than Catholics had.
@@deutschermichel5807 Not nowadays , they are more devious the RC Church infiltrates through ecumenism, thats how the mainstream denominations have fallen. Only separated evangelical denominations stand firm against ERROR.
Alot more than you think. They got you believing what is false. So they are doing their job. Daniel 7:25 The Most High is speaking about the Roman Catholic church and the Papacy.
@@kuntekinte6246after studying scriptures without biases, I found that it is more logical to self-delete myself than to be protestant. Remove your biases, and you'll become Catholic or at least Eastern Orthodox.
@@rouxmain934 You have to excuse my ignorance what exactly do you mean? Also you don't have to he any denomination only a follower of Yahweh's word. (God)
Brother you have it confused, Christ himself started the Catholic Church. it is his very body. That is why we hope for an end to Protestantism because it is the separation and tearing apart of Christ’s body. God doesn’t sow division but gathers his people into his body. The church is not the enemy. God bless you and please pray God with as open a heart as possible, I’m confident if you do he will show you the purpose and role God intends for his church.
Jesus said in Matthew 10:34, "Think not that l am come to send peace on earth: l came not to send peace, but a sword." The Catholic church is NOT the body of Christ, never was, and never will be. It is nothing but baptized paganism.
Yeshua did not create the Catholic church. Daniel 7:25 is speaking about the Papacy and the Catholic church. It is filled with paganism and idolatry. It was the Constantine who changed the Sabbath day in 321AD, then the council of Nicaea two years began enforcing it.
Where is transubstantiation (or whatever it's called) in the Bible, and where does it say that priests have the power to transform wine and bread? And when Jesus said of the bread and wine (at the Passover meal), "This is my flesh... This is my blood," do you also take that literally? If not, then you are inconsistent. Also, in John 6, Jesus said that his words were "spirit... and life." He didn't say that they were literal. He made many statements that you cannot take literally, like "I am the gate," "the door," etc.
@@FrankCostanza-u4b "For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed." (John6:55) Yes, I do take "This is my flesh... This is my blood." literally. As did all Christians, before protestantism. "But there are some of you that do not believe." For Jesus knew from the first who those were that did not believe, and who it was that would betray him. (John6:64) I think it's funny how "Christians" for the past 500yrs think everything needs to be in the Bible in order for it to be true. But there are also many other things which Jesus did; were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written. (John21:25) How would anyone know the TRUTH, if it weren't for the Bible, like Christians for the first 300+ years after Jesus ascended? That's why He gave us a CHURCH.
@GodEater82 I take it that you cannot demonstrate transubstantiation from the Bible. You also ignore Christ's words when he says, "Do this in remembrance of me." He does not say, "Do this to remain saved," or "Do this or you will die spiritually," or whatever else your doctrine teaches. Also, if the bread and wine he gave them to eat and drink were literally his flesh and blood, then the Apostles ate it and pooped it out somewhere in Judea long ago. Therefor, no one can eat Jesus' flesh or drink his blood since they are in urine and feces somewhere in Judea. But also, since parts of the bread and wine became part of the bodies of the Apostles, then we'd have to eat their bodies, too. Thomas is buried in India; maybe we could remove his body from his tomb there. But the truth is that you don't actually take Jesus' words literally. Otherwise, you'd have to admit that the bread they ate was Jesus' body, which it wasn't. But if you think it was, you aren't thinking that from the Bible. You cannot appeal to John's statement about unlisted miracles to teach a doctrine nowhere expressed in the Bible. What's really sad is that one of the supposedly most important Christian doctrines was never recorded by the Gospel writers, nor is it recorded in any of the epistles. If you literally believe that you must eat Jesus, then you must bring him down from heaven in order to do so. But you cannot. Therefor, you must make up the ritual of the Mass. But I asked for evidence that this ritual originates in Jesus' teachings recorded in the Bible. You have refused to provide this evidence. The reason can only be because you cannot do so since it isn't there. Jesus said that he is the bread from heaven. But Jesus is not bread at all; he's a human being - a man. But you must believe that Jesus was a literal loaf of bread. Jesus said, "It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." If the flesh profits nothing, then eating Jesus' flesh profits nothing. That's what you must believe if you take his words literally. Jesus said that he was the good shepherd. But there is no record that he ever shepherded sheep. He was a carpenter for all we know. So you must believe that either Jesus was lying or that he was a shepherd during those unrecorded years between Luke 2 and the coming of John the Baptist. But then he wouldn't be a shepherd anymore. Jesus said that he is the true vine. Therefor, you must believe that Jesus was a plant growing from the ground. But you know that he wasn't. So, why do you not believe your own reason? How can you deceive yourself thusly? The Early Church did not believe what Catholics now teach. The Catholic leaders are lying to you, as far as I can tell. Tertullian wrote: “Having taken the bread and given it to His disciples, Jesus made it His own body, by saying, ‘This is My body,’ that is, the symbol of My body. There could not have been a symbol, however, unless there was first a true body. An empty thing or phantom is incapable of a symbol. He likewise, when mentioning the cup and making the new covenant to be sealed ‘in His blood,’ affirms the reality of His body. For no blood can belong to a body that is not a body of flesh” (Against Marcion, 4.40)." Justin Martyr wrote: Dialogue with Trypho, Chapter 70 "Now it is evident, that in this prophecy [allusion is made] to the bread which our Christ gave us to eat, in remembrance of His being made flesh for the sake of His believers, for whom also He suffered; and to the cup which He gave us to drink, in remembrance of His own blood, with giving of thanks." Didache 9 (on the Eucharist) says nothing about transubstantiation. Origen: "And we have a symbol of gratitude to God in the bread which we call the Eucharist." Against Celsus 8:57 Eusebius: Proof of the Gospel, 7 "This (μνημη is “celebrated on a table by means of the symbols of His Body and His saving Blood (επι τραπεζης δια συμβολων του τε σωματος αυτου και του σωτηριου αιματος).” It fulfils Ps. xxiii. 5. “Thus in our rites we have been taught to offer through our whole lives bloodless and reasonable and acceptable sacrifices through His Supreme High Priest.”" "(iii) 380 d. - The expressions in Zech. ix. 9 and 15, are allusions to the Eucharist, and point to the joy given by the mystic wine, and the glory and purity of the mystic food. “For He delivered the symbols (συμβολα) of His divine dispensation to his disciples, bidding them make the image of His own Body (την εικονα του ιδιου σωματος ποιεσθαι).” Rejecting the Mosaic sacrifices, He delivered them bread to use as a symbol of His Body (αρτω χρησθαι συμβολω του ιδιου σωματος). This further illustrates the use of συμβολον. We gather from these passages: - (i) That the Mosaic Sacrifice, the Sacrifice on the Cross, and the Eucharistic Sacrifice are intimately related. The latter is a Memorial of the Sacrifice of the Cross in a far higher sense than the Jewish sacrifices were foreshadowings uf it. They were but symbols that were unreal, the Eucharist is a symbol but it “embraces reality,” i.e. it includes what it represents. It is the archetype of which they were symbols." There are many others. Now, Ignatius (or Ireneus?) did make statements that sound like Catholic doctrine. But with so many other witnesses quoted above (and there are others), one can either interpret Ignatius as speaking symbolically as Jesus did, or one can think Ignatius took a different view from others. That's your choice. But since you have no biblical warrant to do so, then you are acting like the Pharisees did with the Old Testament. You need to read Hebrews 10. The author of Hebrews says, "But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool. For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified." Therefor, the Sacrifice of the Mass is heresy.
Keep reading: "It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." (John 6.63)
The Catholic church is not the body of Christ. It never was and never will be. The churches who unite with her are her daughters, and together, they form Mystic Babylon.
@@JewelsofTruth So do you think all Christians prior to the protestant reformation weren't "real Christians" since they were part of the Catholic Church?
Wow. Just wow. Ain’t no jewels or truth from this guy. It’s funny how anyone can claim to be a Protestant and suddenly becomes an expert on Catholicism and are singularly fixated on attacking The Catholic Church rather than focus on their own salvation😎✝️🙏🏼
So, according to your reasoning, a person would have to be a homosexual in order to have the right to criticize homosexuals. Any person who is not a homosexual has no right to condemn homosexuals.
@@JewelsofTruth Dude you’re full of hate. And you really hate Catholics for some reason. I’ll pray for you, brother. I pray for Blessed Mother Mary’s intercession on your behalf that The Holy Spirit will descend on you and for your Guardian Angel and Archangel Michael to protect you from the demons that plague you. Peace, brother 🙏🏼✝️
@@JewelsofTruth Dude you’re full of hate. And you really hate Catholics for some reason. I’ll pray for you, brother. I pray for Blessed Mother Mary’s intercession on your behalf that The Holy Spirit will descend on you and for your Guardian Angel and Archangel Michael to protect you from the demons that plague you. Peace, brother 🙏🏼✝️
On the contrary, you are the ignorant one here. God led the British Monarchy to approve this work. The King James Bible is the ONLY transliteration of the Scriptures. No other version can make that claim. All of the modern versions to one degree or another are corrupted.
@@JewelsofTruth No, the KJV is not the only transliteration of the scripture. That is an incredibly ignorant take. All others are corrupt? How? Were they not “authorized” enough?
The Papacy and the Catholic Church is absurd. If anyone would read the Most Highs word, they would come to realize that they are false prophets and engage in paganism and idolatry.
@kuntekinte6246 The self own you wrote here is just incredible. Since you apparently have read the Most High's book, please enlighten us on what paganism and idolatry even is. I don't expect much from you, but you should at least make new laugh.
@@thepalegalilean Mark 7:8 For laying aside the commandment of God , ye hold the tradition of men ,as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do."
@@thepalegalilean Just look inside these churches or just about all churches. They have statues of Mary and crosses every where then every Christmas the Pope walks around with a wooden doll. Second commandment, make no graven images. Yeshua was never crucified on a cross. The cross is a Pagen symbol used in the Assyrian, Egyptian, Babylonian, Greek, and now Roman Empire. It is the symbol of the Sun god. Hence Constantine changed the Sabbath day to Sunday, Daniel 7:25. Then Christmas is the celebration of Mythra. Yeshua never was born in December.
So is Luther, Calvin and the rest all considered to be profits? Many Lutheran churches I’ve been to barely have visible crosses but have GIANT portraits of Luther
Growing up in central Illinois as a kid I do remember seeing that at many of the Lutheran churches I was in (that was a long time ago LOL) part of my family on my dad’s side was Lutheran. I remember thinking it seemed pretty odd even that young and I doubt that is the norm. Sometimes when having minor theology conversations with Protestant brothers and sisters if I say; quote St Cathrine of sienna they might scaf and say they were just a person (I certainly don’t argue with that) but then reply with something Luther or Calvin said. (Which to me implies that they are greater than an average human?) I honestly don’t know how the ideology works in various Lutheran and Calvin congregations, (since I am neither of them) I was just genuinely curious. I didn’t mean to upset or sound rude or uncharitable towards anyone, and I apologize if my comment came off as such.
@@yuricomrade563 Many of those in the radical reformation movement see Lutherans as “Catholic light” and think Luther stands as some kind of “Lutheran Pope”. This merely demonstrates their ignorance. While one would find picture of popes in Roman churches, generally one does not see pictures of Luther in Lutheran churches, especially in the chapel. Maybe one could be found in the narthex or the pastor’s office. Regardless, “large ones” is a ridiculous notion. And incidentally, Lutherans are not “Catholic light.” Rather they are “Catholic right”.
@@Qwerty-jy9mj Of course, the RC Church slaugtered more Christians than the Roman Empire ever did. Time wouldn t allow to tell of the deposings, corruption, bloodshed and immorality (e g the Borgias ) over centuries that this "church" has been responsible for. Counterfeit Christianity.
Well, I already know who will be on the inside of the pearly gates. It won’t be you and the others that gave a 👍. Your character is that of the master deceiver.
It was written in Greek. No one would use an Aramaic translation. Granted, I know why you would like the Aramaic to be used. This is because “rock” in the Greek is feminine, and cannot refer directly to Peter, a male. But it most definitely refers to that which Peter demonstrated, his faith, which is feminine. (Aramaic doesn’t have this problem.) But since Matthew was originally written in Greek, that makes it the authoritative text.
In Johns day when writing the Revelation, the angel said, "And the woman which thou sawest 👉is👈 that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth. Revelation 17:18 Obviously pointing to Rome, since at the time it was the worlds ruling power. Let me mention the fact that a woman in the Revelation of Christ, represents a church; and in this case that church is the Catholic one (specifically the Vatican headquarters, where her ruling figures of authority reside). Mystery Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth. That is why she hates the Bible in it's purest form. It points her out as plain as day. They claim their authority is above that of the Bible; But the Bible says, "To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them." Isaiah 8:20. Obviously there's a problem when you got leaders claiming their authority is above the Bible.
@@JewelsofTruth I didn't watch the full video really, as its probably nonesense... but I wish there was truly a plan to destroy the protestant heresy once and for all
How do they even come up with this stuff? wouldn't it be far easier to learn actual history? Also, is the kingdom of England necessary for salvation? I've never understood KJV onlyist people
I understand why Catholics became Protestants. They were right to protest the wrongdoing in the hierarchy of Rome. It is now time to reunite for the sake of Christianity worldwide.
It's fine to protest corruption and call for reform, however Luther breaking away entirely to start his own church is where the issue lies. Not to mention him changing core Christian doctrines and removing 7 books from the Bible, simply because he didn't like what was taught in them...
Revelation 18:4 says, "Come out of her My people. . . " That means we should SEPARATE ourselves from that apostate church. The Catholic church is a fallen church. It is Babylon.
They did it in Zimbabwe in 1963 Mugabes champion was Jerome O Hara Jesuits came from all over the world to stir people up against each other it was prophesied that he would die in three years and he did now all his educated people is in Southern Africa
Yes and though they cover their tracks, you ll find they were the instigators behind the 2 world wars and even the American Civil War, and also they were responsible for Abraham Lincolns assassination.
I'm Protestant. Catholic and Protestant relationships were not great back in the 19th century. But many things have changed since then. The Holy Spirit leads us to unite - not dividing more and more. The Catholic Church has seen many reforms and had some serious changes. Francis is doing a great job leading the Church back to synodal leadership like the Orthodox and the early church had. Vatican 2 was a watershed moment and Francis is currently looking at a "new expression" of papal primacy. Regarding faith alone - the Regensburg Colloquy proves that justification can be resolved. This was kind of achieved in the Catholic-Lutheran Joint Declaration of Justification.
Jesus said in Matthew 10:34, "Think not that l am come to send peace on earth: l came not to send peace, but a sword." Catholics need to repent and leave the Catholic church.
@@JewelsofTruth I disagree. God wants Protestants and Catholics to heal the wounds of the past. The Catholic Church was our mother. God didn’t abandon her. I know you think He did, but He didn’t. God is doing a great work with Catholics today. Besides, parts of the Protestant church are a mess today.
I was a KJV onlyist for a long long time uggggg what a mistake secondly concerning the claims within Catholicism are not without merit. This is after I left the conservative church I looked at all the uncanonized works and the saints works and found our commentaries inferior to theirs...theirs was way further ahead
You were duped by the Man of Sin in the same way that the disobedient prophet was duped by the false prophet in 1Kings 13. Look it up. If you don't repent you will end up being destroyed.
@@JewelsofTruth Sigh i hope you realized what you said. What you said is not the Truth. If you look at your own commentaries they are quoting the uncanonized works as well. I know because i own them. Coupled with the fact is if you contact your local seminary they already have these works studied and worked on, they just haven't brought them ahead for the churches to know.
I really couldn't care less and don't have those so-called Protestant commentaries. The fact is, most of the things that come from the "Protestants" is garbage. Protestants no longer recognize who the Antichrist is, like the old Protestants did. They really have rejected Protestantism. To be a true Protestant means to protest Rome.
Well ya any education on Protestantism is wrong, you have to argue from ignorance and not be educated. Martin Luther was a Marian. One of the Main Authors of the KJV is buried like a saint and receives yearly visits like a catholic saint. Even if your a 66 book believer you have major problems because Jesus Quoted the Apocryah, The OT refereces people in the Apocrypha. The Apocrypha Claims it is inspired. The KJV included the Apocrypha 275 years. The book of Enoch is the backbone of the Bible is so many ways because the Apostles kept quoting it. And the list keeps going.......
It's like drinking poison. The King James Bible is of the pure line of Bibles. The modern versions have poison mixed in them. It's up to you to weigh the evidence. If you want to drink the one that is polluted, go ahead, but l have warned you.
The Catholic Church is growing, not shrinking. Catholicism in Africa and Asia has exploded in recent decades. And protestant denominations are, by definition, already broken up. There's literally thousands of protestant churches already. What difference would it make if there are a thousand more?
@@SanctusPaulus1962 I can hand pick shrinking areas as much as you can pick growing ones. A couple of large protestant denominations have broken up lately to accept sin. Christianity has been shrinking overall for a while. The baby boomers are going to be with Jesus and they are a large part of congregations here in the U.S.
Touching 08:33, "The following instructions were sent, in 1551, from the Council of Trent to the Jesuits of Paris, through Casa, Archbishop of Benevento. ... _"Ye are not to preach all after one method, but to observe the place wherein you come. If Lutheranism be prevalent, then preach Calvinism ; if Calvinism, then Lutheranism ; if in England, then either of them, or John Huss's opinions, Anabaptism, or any that are contrary to the Holy See of St. Peter, by which your function will not be suspected, and yet you may still act on the interest of the Mother-Church ; there being, as the Council are agreed on, no better way to demolish that Church of heresy, but by mixtures of doctrines, and by adding ceremonies more than be at present permitted. Some of you who undertook to be of this sort of heretical Episcopal Society, bring it as near to the Mother-Church as you can ; for then the Lutheran party, the Calvinists, the Anabaptists, and other heretics will be averse thereunto, and thereby make that Episcopal heresy odious to all these, and be a means to reduce all in time to the Mother Church."_ ~Wm. Goode (Dean of Ripon), "Rome's Tactics," p. 6, 1868. Blessings to you and yours @Jewels of Truth!
Thank you very much for that comment. It is very much appreciated in light of the fact that most of the comments on these videos are negative--by Catholics of course. We need more of these comments, but unfortunately most Protestants and Seventh-day Adventists are asleep.
GOOD morning to all brother's And SISTER'S from the seat of the little horn. That is what we see and live TODAY🙏 OUR SDA CHURCH FOR THE MOST PART GONE TO THE DOG'S 😢😢😢
@@ՆաթանիելՄաշ Peter was a hebrew, not a canaanite. Regardless, do you then think that Jesus was wrong to give the keys of heaven to Saint Peter? Are you accusing the son of God of being incompetent? Are you claiming to know better than God himself?
@@SanctusPaulus1962 Christ gave him these keys to keep the Canaanites out. He sits directly outside the gates for this purpose. Christianity is older than you are aware. The Vatican is an imposter Christianity distorting the truth ad predicted.
I dont subscribe to the pagan catholicism nor to the infiltrated protestant business organizations of church. My faith is in Jesus alone no rituals only the apostles teachings in scripture. I dont earn my salvation with good works yet, i follow Acts2: 38 they all heard abiut Jesus crucified buried and arose from the dead. They repented were baptised in Jesus name for the remission of sins and received the Holy Spirit. The began a life of obedience to Jesus. No one is perfect but a true believer repents and attempts to " go and sin no more" not living our lives unto DEATH. Martyrdom is scary but well worth it.
Sorry, but there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church. Christ did not establish his Church on the rock of Saint Peter just to have people like you spit upon it and call it "pagan". Not all who proclaim "Lord, Lord' will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. That verse is referring to you.
@SanctusPaulus1962 Hogwash Daniel 7:25 is speaking about the Papacy and the Catholic church. In 321AD, Constantine changed the Sabbath day, and then two years later the Council of Nicaea enforced it. Nothing but Idolatry and Paganism in those churches. They go again the Most High and his word. Oh and by the way all the deciples including Peter were Isrealites not some white man who was Catholic.
@SanctusPaulus1962 you are so indoctrinated!! Constantines' creation of the pagan universal ritual organization has NOTHING to do with true salvation. As much as I love the dead Peter, he is not THE ROCK Jesus is!! The catholic system is more aligned with satanic belief than simple basic true faith in Jesus beliefs!! The whole idea of praying to dead people is satanic. Bowing down to graven images is satanic. Claiming Mary is God is satanic. Praying to Angels is satanic. Paying for sun's to be forgiven is satanic. Claiming to be above scriptures is satanic. Murdering true followers of Jesus is satanic. The creation of the Jesuit order was satanic. Claiming one leader is God on earth is satanic. Ect... ect... repent!! And follow the true gospel of Jesus!!
@@77saint77posttrib I just try to do what our Most High has asked of us. I have spoken to many Catholics and have challenged them with the word. If they accept that is on them. I just do like it says in Matthew 10:14 , Mark 6:11 & Luke 9:5 . Shake the dust off my feet. Thankyou and Shalom.
Protestantism destroys itself, it is its fate.
Heard that in Jame Cage White's voice and I giggled. Indeed. It is fate. The gates of Hell will not prevail against the Catholic Church!
@@MonicaLabbao_littlemonicat Yeah! Long before the Reformers showed up, the Catholic Church was already being called “the devil’s harlot,” and Catholics, “servants of Antichrist”: Accordingly, by Montanists, Catholics were called “the carnal;” by Novatians, “the apostates;” by Valentinians, “the worldly;” by Manichees, “the simple;” by Aërians, “the ancient;” by Apollinarians, “the man-worshippers;” by Origenists, “the flesh-lovers,” and “the slimy;” by the Nestorians, “Egyptians;” by Monophysites, the “Chalcedonians;” by Donatists, “the traitors,” and “the sinners,” and “servants of Antichrist;” and St. Peter’s chair, “the seat of pestilence;” and by the Luciferians, the Church was called “a brothel,” “the devil’s harlot,” and “synagogue of Satan.” These groups were the opponents of the Church Fathers and councils who gave us the Nicene, Apostles’, and Athanasian Creeds.
Some of these movements existed for centuries, but they finally dissolved.
Popery is not Christianity.
@MonicaLabbao_littlemonicat
The roman catholic cult may try to exterminate true christianity, but Christ will one day come back and the catholic church will not accept Him...just like the Pharisees did not accept Christ.
Well, sorry. The Gates of Hell DID prevail against the Catholic church. Like Martin Luther said, "I am much afraid that the universities will prove to be the very gates of hell unless they diligently labor in explaining the Holy Scriptures, and engraving them in the hearts of youth. I advise no one to place his child where the Scriptures do not reign paramount. Every institution in which men are not unceasingly occupied with the word of God must become corrupt." That discribes the Catholic church. He also said,"If there is a hell, Rome is built over it: it is an abyss whence issues every kind of sin."
Let’s pray to God it succeeds and Christendom is reunited under Christ’s one and only visible Church once again.
Amen Brother. A muscular Christianity is what we need. We believe in ONE HOLY, CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC CHURCH?
These comments and attitudes will result in the persecution of those who disagree with your false theology.
All Trinitarians are now on @jewelsoftruth shite list
I feel like I'm going to regret watching this...
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
Why?
Man I wish the Jesuits were still that conservative. Great job reading that chapter!
Wow the Jesuits were cool.
They almost converted all of Japan to Christianity but then Queen Elizabeth I of England lied to the Shogun and told him that the Catholics are a threat. All Christians were brutally persecuted and murdered in Japan because of the corrupt and egoistic protestants
They were the most wicked "religious" order that ever walked this earth. There s a special place in Hell waiting for them.
The King Jimmy Bible now was 7 missing books and over 400 errors.
We literally just had a Vatican Council that recognized Protestants officially as members of Christ.
So, what is that supposed to mean? That the Papacy is fine now with Protestants? Nonsense!! How many times throughout the centuries has the Papacy lied to and deceived the Protestants into believing such garbage. Example: The Saint Bartholomew Massacre.
@@JewelsofTruthfake news didn't start with CNN and MSNBC. It started with Dutch Protestants and the Black Legend.
Much of what you have been taught about Catholicism and protestantism is false.
But what we can ignore is the evidence of historical facts that remain today. For instance, All of the Protestant countries founded in the Americas are nearly entirely white and black, with very few natives left. Yet almost all of the Catholic countries are now majority natives, with very few white or black people. So how did this happen if the Catholics were the genocidal ones ? After all, Protestants claim Catholics came and committed mass genocide, yet the only ones that seem to have wiped out the natives or the Protestants, while the Catholic countries have a vast native majority now.
Protestant propaganda claimed Catholics were the genocide to once, but in reality it was actually the Protestants.
Much of Catholic va Protestant history was actually twisted in this same fashion. For instance, Protestants killed far more Catholics than vice versa, but the Black Legend propaganda twisted it into reverse. Likewise, Protestants had far more military involvement in spreading their beliefs than Catholics had.
@@JewelsofTruthFake news didn't start with CNN and MSNBC. It started with Protestants and the Black Legend.
Much of what you have been taught about Catholicism vs Protestantism is historically false.
But what we can't ignore is the evidence of historical facts that remain today. For instance, all of the Protestant countries founded in the Americas are nearly entirely white and black, with very few natives left. Yet almost all of the Catholic countries are now majority natives, with very few white or black people. So how did this happen if the Catholics were the genocidal ones? After all, Protestants claim Catholics came and committed mass genocide, yet the only ones that seem to have wiped out the natives are the Protestants, while the Catholic countries have always had a vast native majority.
Protestant propaganda claimed Catholics were the genocidal ones, but in reality it was actually the Protestants.
Much of Catholic vs Protestant history was actually twisted in this same fashion. For instance, Protestants killed far more Catholics than vice versa, but the Black Legend propaganda twisted it into reverse. Likewise, Protestants had far more military involvement in spreading their beliefs than Catholics had.
@@JewelsofTruth do you really think the Church massacres protestants?
@@deutschermichel5807 Not nowadays , they are more devious the RC Church infiltrates through ecumenism, thats how the mainstream denominations have fallen. Only separated evangelical denominations stand firm against ERROR.
This is so funny watching this as a Catholic. They're not nearly as uh, organized or efficient as you believe.
Alot more than you think. They got you believing what is false. So they are doing their job. Daniel 7:25 The Most High is speaking about the Roman Catholic church and the Papacy.
@@kuntekinte6246after studying scriptures without biases, I found that it is more logical to self-delete myself than to be protestant.
Remove your biases, and you'll become Catholic or at least Eastern Orthodox.
@@rouxmain934 You have to excuse my ignorance what exactly do you mean? Also you don't have to he any denomination only a follower of Yahweh's word. (God)
@@kuntekinte6246 okay, put the verse and explain it, buster
@@Schrodj1 Explain what? Be specific.
Brother you have it confused, Christ himself started the Catholic Church. it is his very body. That is why we hope for an end to Protestantism because it is the separation and tearing apart of Christ’s body.
God doesn’t sow division but gathers his people into his body. The church is not the enemy.
God bless you and please pray God with as open a heart as possible, I’m confident if you do he will show you the purpose and role God intends for his church.
Jesus said in Matthew 10:34, "Think not that l am come to send peace on earth: l came not to send peace, but a sword." The Catholic church is NOT the body of Christ, never was, and never will be. It is nothing but baptized paganism.
Yeshua did not create the Catholic church. Daniel 7:25 is speaking about the Papacy and the Catholic church. It is filled with paganism and idolatry. It was the Constantine
who changed the Sabbath day in 321AD, then the council of Nicaea two years began enforcing it.
"Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you…”
John 6:53
Where is transubstantiation (or whatever it's called) in the Bible, and where does it say that priests have the power to transform wine and bread? And when Jesus said of the bread and wine (at the Passover meal), "This is my flesh... This is my blood," do you also take that literally? If not, then you are inconsistent. Also, in John 6, Jesus said that his words were "spirit... and life." He didn't say that they were literal. He made many statements that you cannot take literally, like "I am the gate," "the door," etc.
@@FrankCostanza-u4b Frank, well said.
@@FrankCostanza-u4b "For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed." (John6:55) Yes, I do take "This is my flesh... This is my blood." literally. As did all Christians, before protestantism. "But there are some of you that do not believe." For Jesus knew from the first who those were that did not believe, and who it was that would betray him. (John6:64) I think it's funny how "Christians" for the past 500yrs think everything needs to be in the Bible in order for it to be true. But there are also many other things which Jesus did; were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written. (John21:25) How would anyone know the TRUTH, if it weren't for the Bible, like Christians for the first 300+ years after Jesus ascended? That's why He gave us a CHURCH.
@GodEater82 I take it that you cannot demonstrate transubstantiation from the Bible. You also ignore Christ's words when he says, "Do this in remembrance of me." He does not say, "Do this to remain saved," or "Do this or you will die spiritually," or whatever else your doctrine teaches. Also, if the bread and wine he gave them to eat and drink were literally his flesh and blood, then the Apostles ate it and pooped it out somewhere in Judea long ago. Therefor, no one can eat Jesus' flesh or drink his blood since they are in urine and feces somewhere in Judea. But also, since parts of the bread and wine became part of the bodies of the Apostles, then we'd have to eat their bodies, too. Thomas is buried in India; maybe we could remove his body from his tomb there.
But the truth is that you don't actually take Jesus' words literally. Otherwise, you'd have to admit that the bread they ate was Jesus' body, which it wasn't. But if you think it was, you aren't thinking that from the Bible.
You cannot appeal to John's statement about unlisted miracles to teach a doctrine nowhere expressed in the Bible. What's really sad is that one of the supposedly most important Christian doctrines was never recorded by the Gospel writers, nor is it recorded in any of the epistles.
If you literally believe that you must eat Jesus, then you must bring him down from heaven in order to do so. But you cannot. Therefor, you must make up the ritual of the Mass. But I asked for evidence that this ritual originates in Jesus' teachings recorded in the Bible. You have refused to provide this evidence. The reason can only be because you cannot do so since it isn't there.
Jesus said that he is the bread from heaven. But Jesus is not bread at all; he's a human being - a man. But you must believe that Jesus was a literal loaf of bread.
Jesus said, "It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." If the flesh profits nothing, then eating Jesus' flesh profits nothing. That's what you must believe if you take his words literally.
Jesus said that he was the good shepherd. But there is no record that he ever shepherded sheep. He was a carpenter for all we know. So you must believe that either Jesus was lying or that he was a shepherd during those unrecorded years between Luke 2 and the coming of John the Baptist. But then he wouldn't be a shepherd anymore.
Jesus said that he is the true vine. Therefor, you must believe that Jesus was a plant growing from the ground. But you know that he wasn't. So, why do you not believe your own reason?
How can you deceive yourself thusly? The Early Church did not believe what Catholics now teach. The Catholic leaders are lying to you, as far as I can tell.
Tertullian wrote:
“Having taken the bread and given it to His disciples, Jesus made it His own body, by saying, ‘This is My body,’ that is, the symbol of My body. There could not have been a symbol, however, unless there was first a true body. An empty thing or phantom is incapable of a symbol. He likewise, when mentioning the cup and making the new covenant to be sealed ‘in His blood,’ affirms the reality of His body. For no blood can belong to a body that is not a body of flesh” (Against Marcion, 4.40)."
Justin Martyr wrote:
Dialogue with Trypho, Chapter 70
"Now it is evident, that in this prophecy [allusion is made] to the bread which our Christ gave us to eat, in remembrance of His being made flesh for the sake of His believers, for whom also He suffered; and to the cup which He gave us to drink, in remembrance of His own blood, with giving of thanks."
Didache 9 (on the Eucharist) says nothing about transubstantiation.
Origen:
"And we have a symbol of gratitude to God in the bread which we call the Eucharist." Against Celsus 8:57
Eusebius:
Proof of the Gospel, 7
"This (μνημη is “celebrated on a table by means of the symbols of His Body and His saving Blood (επι τραπεζης δια συμβολων του τε σωματος αυτου και του σωτηριου αιματος).” It fulfils Ps. xxiii. 5. “Thus in our rites we have been taught to offer through our whole lives bloodless and reasonable and acceptable sacrifices through His Supreme High Priest.”"
"(iii) 380 d. - The expressions in Zech. ix. 9 and 15, are allusions to the Eucharist, and point to the joy given by the mystic wine, and the glory and purity of the mystic food. “For He delivered the symbols (συμβολα) of His divine dispensation to his disciples, bidding them make the image of His own Body (την εικονα του ιδιου σωματος ποιεσθαι).” Rejecting the Mosaic sacrifices, He delivered them bread to use as a symbol of His Body (αρτω χρησθαι συμβολω του ιδιου σωματος).
This further illustrates the use of συμβολον.
We gather from these passages: - (i) That the Mosaic Sacrifice, the Sacrifice on the Cross, and the Eucharistic Sacrifice are intimately related. The latter is a Memorial of the Sacrifice of the Cross in a far higher sense than the Jewish sacrifices were foreshadowings uf it. They were but symbols that were unreal, the Eucharist is a symbol but it “embraces reality,” i.e. it includes what it represents. It is the archetype of which they were symbols."
There are many others.
Now, Ignatius (or Ireneus?) did make statements that sound like Catholic doctrine. But with so many other witnesses quoted above (and there are others), one can either interpret Ignatius as speaking symbolically as Jesus did, or one can think Ignatius took a different view from others. That's your choice. But since you have no biblical warrant to do so, then you are acting like the Pharisees did with the Old Testament.
You need to read Hebrews 10. The author of Hebrews says, "But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool. For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified."
Therefor, the Sacrifice of the Mass is heresy.
Keep reading: "It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." (John 6.63)
This is totally false. Brother you are doing the devils work trying to split up the body of Christ
By "the body of Christ", do you mean the Catholic church?
@@JewelsofTruth
The body of Christ is a reference to all Christans.
The Catholic church is not the body of Christ. It never was and never will be. The churches who unite with her are her daughters, and together, they form Mystic Babylon.
Jesus said, "l came not to bring peace, but a sword."
@@JewelsofTruth So do you think all Christians prior to the protestant reformation weren't "real Christians" since they were part of the Catholic Church?
Wow. Just wow. Ain’t no jewels or truth from this guy.
It’s funny how anyone can claim to be a Protestant and suddenly becomes an expert on Catholicism and are singularly fixated on attacking The Catholic Church rather than focus on their own salvation😎✝️🙏🏼
So, according to your reasoning, a person would have to be a homosexual in order to have the right to criticize homosexuals. Any person who is not a homosexual has no right to condemn homosexuals.
@@JewelsofTruth Dude you’re full of hate. And you really hate Catholics for some reason. I’ll pray for you, brother. I pray for Blessed Mother Mary’s intercession on your behalf that The Holy Spirit will descend on you and for your Guardian Angel and Archangel Michael to protect you from the demons that plague you. Peace, brother 🙏🏼✝️
@@JewelsofTruth Dude you’re full of hate. And you really hate Catholics for some reason. I’ll pray for you, brother. I pray for Blessed Mother Mary’s intercession on your behalf that The Holy Spirit will descend on you and for your Guardian Angel and Archangel Michael to protect you from the demons that plague you. Peace, brother 🙏🏼✝️
@@GoProMoFo-yj5wd That was worth repeating, bruh!
Wild, unsubstantiated claims to cast slurs on the church of Jesus Christ. This, too, would fail.
Based. Hope papa Francesco converts all the prots
Unlikely, but one can dream.
Real
The KJV only crowd are a unique group of sadly ignorant people. The KJV was authorized by British Monarchy, not God.
On the contrary, you are the ignorant one here. God led the British Monarchy to approve this work. The King James Bible is the ONLY transliteration of the Scriptures. No other version can make that claim. All of the modern versions to one degree or another are corrupted.
@@JewelsofTruth No, the KJV is not the only transliteration of the scripture. That is an incredibly ignorant take.
All others are corrupt? How? Were they not “authorized” enough?
You're late in You're arrival to this discussion. I've already addressed these issues in previous videos. I suggest you look them up.
@@fortunatecookie9055 He'd have to un alive you 1st then himself next
Lol. This is absurd.
You have no idea how much I wish this video was true.
The Papacy and the Catholic Church is absurd. If anyone would read the Most Highs word, they would come to realize that they are false prophets and engage in paganism and idolatry.
@kuntekinte6246
The self own you wrote here is just incredible. Since you apparently have read the Most High's book, please enlighten us on what paganism and idolatry even is. I don't expect much from you, but you should at least make new laugh.
@@thepalegalilean Mark 7:8 For laying aside the commandment of God , ye hold the tradition of men ,as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do."
@@thepalegalilean Just look inside these churches or just about all churches. They have statues of Mary and
crosses every where then every Christmas the Pope walks around with a wooden doll. Second commandment, make no graven images. Yeshua was never crucified on a cross. The cross is a Pagen symbol used in the Assyrian, Egyptian, Babylonian, Greek, and now Roman Empire. It is the symbol of the Sun god. Hence Constantine changed the Sabbath day to Sunday, Daniel 7:25. Then Christmas is the celebration of Mythra. Yeshua never was born in December.
So is Luther, Calvin and the rest all considered to be profits? Many Lutheran churches I’ve been to barely have visible crosses but have GIANT portraits of Luther
“Profits”?
Barely visible crosses, but giant pictures of Luther? This clearly demonstrates you a liar.
Growing up in central Illinois as a kid I do remember seeing that at many of the Lutheran churches I was in (that was a long time ago LOL) part of my family on my dad’s side was Lutheran. I remember thinking it seemed pretty odd even that young and I doubt that is the norm. Sometimes when having minor theology conversations with Protestant brothers and sisters if I say; quote St Cathrine of sienna they might scaf and say they were just a person (I certainly don’t argue with that) but then reply with something Luther or Calvin said. (Which to me implies that they are greater than an average human?) I honestly don’t know how the ideology works in various Lutheran and Calvin congregations, (since I am neither of them) I was just genuinely curious. I didn’t mean to upset or sound rude or uncharitable towards anyone, and I apologize if my comment came off as such.
@@yuricomrade563 Many of those in the radical reformation movement see Lutherans as “Catholic light” and think Luther stands as some kind of “Lutheran Pope”. This merely demonstrates their ignorance. While one would find picture of popes in Roman churches, generally one does not see pictures of Luther in Lutheran churches, especially in the chapel. Maybe one could be found in the narthex or the pastor’s office. Regardless, “large ones” is a ridiculous notion.
And incidentally, Lutherans are not “Catholic light.” Rather they are “Catholic right”.
Bring back the inquisition
Your comment proves everything l have said about Catholicism.
@@JewelsofTruth
the Holy Inquisition never left, look it up.
So, are you in favor of the Inquisition?
@@JewelsofTruth
Yes of course, the fairest, most thorough, most lenient judicial procedure in the middle ages.
@@Qwerty-jy9mj Of course, the RC Church slaugtered more Christians than the Roman Empire ever did. Time wouldn t allow to tell of the deposings, corruption, bloodshed and immorality (e g the Borgias ) over centuries that this "church" has been responsible for.
Counterfeit Christianity.
We’re coming for ya! Watch out!!
Well, I already know who will be on the inside of the pearly gates. It won’t be you and the others that gave a 👍. Your character is that of the master deceiver.
Matthew 16:18
not complicated
Go to the Aramaic before the Greek.
It was written in Greek. No one would use an Aramaic translation.
Granted, I know why you would like the Aramaic to be used. This is because “rock” in the Greek is feminine, and cannot refer directly to Peter, a male. But it most definitely refers to that which Peter demonstrated, his faith, which is feminine. (Aramaic doesn’t have this problem.) But since Matthew was originally written in Greek, that makes it the authoritative text.
In Johns day when writing the Revelation, the angel said, "And the woman which thou sawest 👉is👈 that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth. Revelation 17:18 Obviously pointing to Rome, since at the time it was the worlds ruling power. Let me mention the fact that a woman in the Revelation of Christ, represents a church; and in this case that church is the Catholic one (specifically the Vatican headquarters, where her ruling figures of authority reside). Mystery Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth. That is why she hates the Bible in it's purest form. It points her out as plain as day. They claim their authority is above that of the Bible; But the Bible says, "To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them." Isaiah 8:20. Obviously there's a problem when you got leaders claiming their authority is above the Bible.
Amen!
If only this were true 😭
So, what do you mean by that? Are you wishing that the Jesuits would do the things l read about?
@@JewelsofTruth I didn't watch the full video really, as its probably nonesense... but I wish there was truly a plan to destroy the protestant heresy once and for all
I wouldn’t worry about it. Francis is too busy putting the wrecking ball to Catholicism!
Huh?
Not really, you fell for radTrad propaganda
How do they even come up with this stuff? wouldn't it be far easier to learn actual history?
Also, is the kingdom of England necessary for salvation? I've never understood KJV onlyist people
I understand why Catholics became Protestants. They were right to protest the wrongdoing in the hierarchy of Rome. It is now time to reunite for the sake of Christianity worldwide.
It's fine to protest corruption and call for reform, however Luther breaking away entirely to start his own church is where the issue lies. Not to mention him changing core Christian doctrines and removing 7 books from the Bible, simply because he didn't like what was taught in them...
Revelation 18:4 says, "Come out of her My people. . . " That means we should SEPARATE ourselves from that apostate church. The Catholic church is a fallen church. It is Babylon.
They did it in Zimbabwe in 1963 Mugabes champion was Jerome O Hara Jesuits came from all over the world to stir people up against each other it was prophesied that he would die in three years and he did now all his educated people is in Southern Africa
Yes and though they cover their tracks, you ll find they were the instigators behind the 2 world wars and even the American Civil War, and also they were responsible for Abraham Lincolns assassination.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
I'm Protestant. Catholic and Protestant relationships were not great back in the 19th century. But many things have changed since then. The Holy Spirit leads us to unite - not dividing more and more. The Catholic Church has seen many reforms and had some serious changes. Francis is doing a great job leading the Church back to synodal leadership like the Orthodox and the early church had. Vatican 2 was a watershed moment and Francis is currently looking at a "new expression" of papal primacy.
Regarding faith alone - the Regensburg Colloquy proves that justification can be resolved. This was kind of achieved in the Catholic-Lutheran Joint Declaration of Justification.
Jesus said in Matthew 10:34, "Think not that l am come to send peace on earth: l came not to send peace, but a sword." Catholics need to repent and leave the Catholic church.
@@JewelsofTruth I disagree. God wants Protestants and Catholics to heal the wounds of the past. The Catholic Church was our mother. God didn’t abandon her. I know you think He did, but He didn’t. God is doing a great work with Catholics today. Besides, parts of the Protestant church are a mess today.
Then you are disagreeing with Christ.
@@JewelsofTruth How so?
The Catholic church is not my mother. The Catholic church is a harlot.
The Papacy has ended according St. Malachy, Protestant will destroy itself.
I was a KJV onlyist for a long long time uggggg what a mistake secondly concerning the claims within Catholicism are not without merit. This is after I left the conservative church I looked at all the uncanonized works and the saints works and found our commentaries inferior to theirs...theirs was way further ahead
The finding of the Dead Sea Scrolls affirmed a lot of Catholic Beliefs and knowing this the Baptists started attacking the Essences
You were duped by the Man of Sin in the same way that the disobedient prophet was duped by the false prophet in 1Kings 13. Look it up. If you don't repent you will end up being destroyed.
@@JewelsofTruth Sigh i hope you realized what you said. What you said is not the Truth. If you look at your own commentaries they are quoting the uncanonized works as well. I know because i own them. Coupled with the fact is if you contact your local seminary they already have these works studied and worked on, they just haven't brought them ahead for the churches to know.
I really couldn't care less and don't have those so-called Protestant commentaries. The fact is, most of the things that come from the "Protestants" is garbage. Protestants no longer recognize who the Antichrist is, like the old Protestants did. They really have rejected Protestantism. To be a true Protestant means to protest Rome.
Well ya any education on Protestantism is wrong, you have to argue from ignorance and not be educated. Martin Luther was a Marian. One of the Main Authors of the KJV is buried like a saint and receives yearly visits like a catholic saint. Even if your a 66 book believer you have major problems because Jesus Quoted the Apocryah, The OT refereces people in the Apocrypha. The Apocrypha Claims it is inspired. The KJV included the Apocrypha 275 years. The book of Enoch is the backbone of the Bible is so many ways because the Apostles kept quoting it. And the list keeps going.......
I think a protestants is same but the majority from view are not.
NOW THE RCC HAS AN RC JESUIT POPE AND HE DONT KNOW THE BIBLE
The Papacy and the Roman Catholic Church is against the Most Highs word. Daniel 7:25 is speaking about them.
ok boomer
🙄🤦♂️ Okay Gen Z’er.
King James Bible What about people who don't read English
I understand, but that is not my concern. My point is expose the truth about the two lines of Bibles--true and false.
@@JewelsofTruth
It's not your concern that you believe the English language is necessary for salvation?
I never said that. You are twisting my words.
@@JewelsofTruth
So the KJV isn't necessary for salvation.
It's like drinking poison. The King James Bible is of the pure line of Bibles. The modern versions have poison mixed in them. It's up to you to weigh the evidence. If you want to drink the one that is polluted, go ahead, but l have warned you.
Catholic Church is bleeding members, protestant denominations are breaking up.
Straight is the gate and narrow is the way 🙌
I think The Catholic Church projected to grow by 500 million more by 2050 according to pew research
The Catholic Church is growing, not shrinking. Catholicism in Africa and Asia has exploded in recent decades. And protestant denominations are, by definition, already broken up. There's literally thousands of protestant churches already. What difference would it make if there are a thousand more?
@@SanctusPaulus1962 I can hand pick shrinking areas as much as you can pick growing ones. A couple of large protestant denominations have broken up lately to accept sin. Christianity has been shrinking overall for a while. The baby boomers are going to be with Jesus and they are a large part of congregations here in the U.S.
L prot
Touching 08:33, "The following instructions were sent, in 1551, from the Council of Trent to the Jesuits of Paris, through Casa, Archbishop of Benevento. ... _"Ye are not to preach all after one method, but to observe the place wherein you come. If Lutheranism be prevalent, then preach Calvinism ; if Calvinism, then Lutheranism ; if in England, then either of them, or John Huss's opinions, Anabaptism, or any that are contrary to the Holy See of St. Peter, by which your function will not be suspected, and yet you may still act on the interest of the Mother-Church ; there being, as the Council are agreed on, no better way to demolish that Church of heresy, but by mixtures of doctrines, and by adding ceremonies more than be at present permitted. Some of you who undertook to be of this sort of heretical Episcopal Society, bring it as near to the Mother-Church as you can ; for then the Lutheran party, the Calvinists, the Anabaptists, and other heretics will be averse thereunto, and thereby make that Episcopal heresy odious to all these, and be a means to reduce all in time to the Mother Church."_ ~Wm. Goode (Dean of Ripon), "Rome's Tactics," p. 6, 1868.
Blessings to you and yours @Jewels of Truth!
Thank you very much for that comment. It is very much appreciated in light of the fact that most of the comments on these videos are negative--by Catholics of course. We need more of these comments, but unfortunately most Protestants and Seventh-day Adventists are asleep.
Amen brother!
GOOD morning to all brother's And SISTER'S from the seat of the little horn.
That is what we see and live TODAY🙏
OUR SDA CHURCH FOR THE MOST PART GONE TO THE DOG'S 😢😢😢
Thank you brother for exposing the Order
You're welcome. Praise the Lord.
oh sda lol
Good exposé on those sinister Jesuits.
sinister?
@@deutschermichel5807 Seriously?
Do your homework!
Independent Christianity please, no papacy!
Independent from what? The wishes of Christ when he established his Church on the rock of Saint Peter (the first pope)?
@@SanctusPaulus1962 The Church, Peter was a Canaanite who denied Christ three times, not my kind of church
@@ՆաթանիելՄաշ Peter was a hebrew, not a canaanite. Regardless, do you then think that Jesus was wrong to give the keys of heaven to Saint Peter? Are you accusing the son of God of being incompetent? Are you claiming to know better than God himself?
@@SanctusPaulus1962 Christ gave him these keys to keep the Canaanites out. He sits directly outside the gates for this purpose. Christianity is older than you are aware. The Vatican is an imposter Christianity distorting the truth ad predicted.
@@ՆաթանիելՄաշ
The Bible tells you to obey your bishop. Who's your bishop?
I dont subscribe to the pagan catholicism nor to the infiltrated protestant business organizations of church. My faith is in Jesus alone no rituals only the apostles teachings in scripture. I dont earn my salvation with good works yet, i follow Acts2: 38 they all heard abiut Jesus crucified buried and arose from the dead. They repented were baptised in Jesus name for the remission of sins and received the Holy Spirit. The began a life of obedience to Jesus. No one is perfect but a true believer repents and attempts to " go and sin no more" not living our lives unto DEATH. Martyrdom is scary but well worth it.
Sorry, but there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church. Christ did not establish his Church on the rock of Saint Peter just to have people like you spit upon it and call it "pagan". Not all who proclaim "Lord, Lord' will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. That verse is referring to you.
@SanctusPaulus1962 Hogwash Daniel 7:25 is speaking about the Papacy and the Catholic church.
In 321AD, Constantine changed the Sabbath day, and then two years later the Council of Nicaea enforced it. Nothing but Idolatry and Paganism in those churches.
They go again the Most High and his word. Oh and by the way all the deciples including Peter were Isrealites not some white man who was Catholic.
@SanctusPaulus1962 you are so indoctrinated!! Constantines' creation of the pagan universal ritual organization has NOTHING to do with true salvation. As much as I love the dead Peter, he is not THE ROCK Jesus is!! The catholic system is more aligned with satanic belief than simple basic true faith in Jesus beliefs!! The whole idea of praying to dead people is satanic. Bowing down to graven images is satanic. Claiming Mary is God is satanic. Praying to Angels is satanic. Paying for sun's to be forgiven is satanic. Claiming to be above scriptures is satanic. Murdering true followers of Jesus is satanic. The creation of the Jesuit order was satanic. Claiming one leader is God on earth is satanic. Ect... ect... repent!! And follow the true gospel of Jesus!!
@kuntekinte6246 only the Holy Spirit can reveal this truth to you. Good job!!
@@77saint77posttrib I just try to do what our Most High has asked of us.
I have spoken to many Catholics and have challenged them with the word.
If they accept that is on them. I just do like it says in Matthew 10:14 , Mark 6:11
& Luke 9:5 . Shake the dust off my feet.
Thankyou and Shalom.