2024 Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2.5G AWD Turbo Review in Malaysia, This Or The New CR-V? | WapCar

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 มิ.ย. 2024
  • The 2024 Mazda CX-5 facelift was recently launched and while the base car is undeniably an “old” car, that doesn’t mean it’s not good, right?
    More so when you consider it in range-topping 2.5G AWD Turbo form with class-leading torque figures. Coupled with improved ride quality, wireless Apple CarPlay and a few more added conveniences, you’ve got the recipe for a solid, dependable and still very good-looking family SUV.
    Follow Adrian and Greg as they take the 2024 Mazda CX-5 facelift on a drive to see what’s new and why this so-called oldie is still as relevant as ever.
    _____________________________________________
    Quick Specs:
    2024 Mazda CX-5 2.5G AWD Turbo
    Engine: 2.5L turbocharged four-cylinder
    Power: 230 PS @ 5,000 rpm
    Torque: 420 Nm @ 2,000 rpm
    Transmission: 6-speed automatic
    Fuel Consumption: 10.4L/100 km (as tested)
    Price: from RM188,760 OTR without insurance
    Read More: www.wapcar.my/cars/mazda/cx-5
    _____________________________________________
    Intro: 00:00
    Specs & Prices: 00:20
    Exterior Styling: 01:02
    Interior & Features: 02:40
    Rear Amenities, Seat and Boot Space: 04:31
    Driving Impressions: 05:54
    Ride Quality and Comfort: 08:43
    Noise Levels and Refinement: 09:55
    Final Thoughts & Conclusion: 10:38
    ____________ Follow Us ____________
    Website www.wapcar.my/
    Facebook: / wapcar.my
    Instagram: / wapcar.my
    Shot & Edited by: Faqrul ( / faqrul.iman )
    Hosted by: Adrian ( / adriannnchia ) & Greg ( / gregorysze )
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 28

  • @aimanfitri0iv
    @aimanfitri0iv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    it looks very good especially in this colour we already saw this in person i absolutely loved it (also my dad considered this but for now not yet) 😊

  • @farishalims
    @farishalims 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Initial D reference was brilliant! 😂

  • @brandonwoo8299
    @brandonwoo8299 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Dated...i own a mazda before and sold it. The nvh is teribble and couple with the underpower 2.0 NA engine you will scream for more power..

  • @BenL1242
    @BenL1242 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hi, i am looking at c segment suv for my small family and considering either this cx5 or the crv. Can you do a comparison of both cars? Or even better comparison of the segment..?

  • @sankarisenguttuvan2804
    @sankarisenguttuvan2804 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Adrian’s tone ❤

  • @ghandi1010
    @ghandi1010 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    2.5 turbo is very thirsty engine. Just go with 2.5 NA to enjoy the drive.

  • @user-sy3pn1se9p
    @user-sy3pn1se9p 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is the double glaze window applied to all variant ?

  • @stevesch7353
    @stevesch7353 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hi Grey, as a CX-30 owner, what do you think about the second row space between CX-30 and CX-5?

  • @aidentai5867
    @aidentai5867 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For me i personally would prefer this over the crv cuz this 2.5 version drives way better than the crv and has better quality

  • @chanderakumar8543
    @chanderakumar8543 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Pls try driving - 150kph on the highway- (if conducive) & then apply the brakes- to hear the humming noise - I think it’s coming from the turbo system. Otherwise the car is a good buy.

  • @bilaldmn4447
    @bilaldmn4447 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Which Mazda showroom do you guys work? 😀 well paid advertising.

  • @Kai-en2xs
    @Kai-en2xs 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the car got big grill small led light i like, what is it's wechat?

  • @sutheshsidhu7227
    @sutheshsidhu7227 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think I am unhappy with the fact that we waited for the facelift long enough for them to still give the older head unit instead of the newer 10.25 inches that are already available in the pre-facelift in some other markets.
    Also maybe bigger diameter tailpipes for the diesel and the turbo like the ones CX-8 is getting?

  • @Moonface00z
    @Moonface00z 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    test drove today.... NvH is terrible and was driving only 80km/h
    You will feel the vibration on the foot area

    • @solajayi6551
      @solajayi6551 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah, i did notice how noisy the engine shout out when i test drove it about 2years ago. it cant be compared to the x70 when it comes to NVH.

  • @thecompressor9595
    @thecompressor9595 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Roadtax too expensive than other competitors while CX5 facelift looks outdated but giving smaller screen for this

    • @foreverl6751
      @foreverl6751 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And the gearbox bad reliability

  • @THECARLOVERNOTGASLOVER
    @THECARLOVERNOTGASLOVER 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Is getting the 2.5 n/a ok?

    • @Suheirith
      @Suheirith 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I did a test drive and found 2.5 turbo has too much power for my needs. The 2.5 na with sports mode switched on has more than enough juice for me to overtake other cars on the highway.

  • @hullabaloo2601
    @hullabaloo2601 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How is the 2.5T petrol consumption?

    • @foreverl6751
      @foreverl6751 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      1 liter can only go 7km city drive, 10km highway drive

  • @AzrinSunbae
    @AzrinSunbae 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Woahhhh

  • @nixfong
    @nixfong 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cx-5 or cx-30 ?

    • @grandehowe
      @grandehowe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Cx 30 cbu owner myself. Ex VAG car owner. Test drove the 2 pre facelift CX 5. I put my money on CX 30. Period 😊

    • @nixfong
      @nixfong 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@grandehowe i tested facelift cx-5 quality , nvh cx-30 ckd better by alot especially road noise. Thanks 🙏🏻

  • @davidyong2698
    @davidyong2698 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do not buy mazda 2.5 and 2.5t major problem Cracked Cylinder Head with Oil leaking, unit now still cannot solve it .

    • @reysee
      @reysee หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is that covered by the 5 years maintenance?

  • @toomuch9762
    @toomuch9762 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have a 2016 black cx5 and it’s waaay nicer than the new models. The front of the new one is nice but from behind is so bland