I can say that you are 100% correct. I started off in coed unit's as a navy Seabee, and eventually went over to the army and became an infantryman..... Far less drama and "fraternizing/ playing favorites" and scandalous shit going on in an all male unit.
Dynamics change all the time. People adjust. Whether it's loosing a team mate, a new guy joining the group, whether it is when blacks were allowed to join the military, or when they were allowed to integrate. You don't think unit cohesion and dynamics wasn't an argument then? Or when women were allowed to serve as pilots or on submarines. The truth is people evolve. And it usually works out. 10 years after women really start serving as SoF people will look back on this the same way.
@@LordSStorm I see what you're saying, but that's like comparing apples and oranges. From a social standpoint, integrating men and women is completely different from integrating different races or a new guy. The best you could hope for is women and men to be treated EXACTLY the same in every way (never gonna happen). And even then, there would still be disparity because there will always be some form of sexual tension from one side or the other.
@@LordSStorm Those are adjustments, not changes.The dynamic of a male group has been virtually the same since before the military even existed. The seals has always been men only. It should stay that way. It works
@@coastshooterkills4614 Its totally true. No one is saying they cant operate with females. IT throws off the dynamic of the teams. Read Dr David Buss and you will understand.
@The Wraith That's not the same thing at all. Keeping the peace among civvies and trying to protect a convoy in the middle of Falluja are two very different things.
@The Wraith The difference is that one deals with civilians who are likely not going to threaten your life in anyway. If they do they are most likely not trained and don't have military caliber weapons. The other deals with being outnumbered in a foreign country where half the population absolutely despises you and wants to kill you. They have military grade weapons and some will literally kill themselves just to kill you.
@The Wraith Civvies don't have snipers shooting at cops. They don't have RPGs and Dual-mount 23mm autocannons. They don't have IEDs. They don't have mortars with ice in them so that by the time you triangulate the mortar, there's no one there. You get the picture, bro?
As a female who was in a military combat position(went in as MP but my rate covered multiple jobs based on my command)I can definitely say they’re huge differences in the makeup of males and females. I was the most in shape female at my command however I was still only average compared to the males. It’s just the way it is. I was good at my job but even better at things that didn’t require my body to break down. There’s beauty in differences. I literally told another woman I don’t feel safe working with her because they had to change a physical standard for her and gave her a passing score in order for her to deploy with us on time… I even to this day believe that the female prt scores need to exactly match the mens because at the end of the day if we’re all deploying together we should pull the same weight. War doesn’t discriminate. And if you can’t pass the standard test across the board then the military shouldn’t be for you. Just my two cents for ppl to get triggered over.
Women have significantly less testosterone than men which is literally responsible for mens speed and strength. Surely you all see there’s physiological and biological differences so why should we then treat both the same. Men and women are both equal in value in society yes but being equal in value does not and should not mean same roles or equal roles. There are some things women will always be better at and there are other things men will always be better at. It really is that simple but people love to blur the lines. I heard go the big pharma is the one who profits the most from putting young kids on a lifetime of hormones (changing sex) so they fund it. I’m not a conspiracy theorist but that’s a pretty reasonable take… also some people say some woman are as fast and strong as men well they’re an exception to the rule and if they pass the standard for making it as a soldier or marine etc then fine but lowering the standard because they are not male and they’re female is not the way forward. If you are an exception to the rule then the rule shouldn’t be changed for the sake of woke just because a few made it… I fully agree with you by the way, we should play to the strengths of each other in everything. If we tell everyone ok men and women can compete, in the end the women will lose unfortunately and how’s that fair for them? So much for equality
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted. According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle. According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
I think people do. There is a tiny minority that does not, and we gave them the power to control our media, which makes everyone feel as if they were the norm. I can pretty much count on one finger the people I know that support this Bullshit. Basically one out of 500? Maybe? That is pretty much the percentage of nutcases that existed since humanity does.
william ladd I agree with this interview and his logic. Buuut your comment. If I’m not mistaken the US Army, the military in general played a huge role in leading the way for spark of the civil rights movement and rightfully so.
@@rudiekazu actually i wasn't correcting you, you got the quote right the first time, i was just suggesting that using the word injustice would have been better 😅
I remember hearing that a female operator was taken POW in Desert Storm. They got her out... and then she disappeared. No after-action report was declassified.
if the men who make up the Special Forces Navy Seals Green Berets Force Recon Marines Delta Force had the mentality of a lot of females no country on Earth would mess with us because they would be some of the most heartless ruthless Shameless unfeeling individuals known to mankind
Dude, it's fucking crazy. Because of PC culture and feminism half the population has been brainwashed to believe women can do anything a man can do. Which is true to an extent, but there ain't no women in the NFL or NBA or MLB, and that ain't because they're not allowed, lol!
@@Ealdorman_of_Mercia the Master Gunnery Sergeants lead at the Battalion level or higher, all the way up to Force levels, advising Majors all the way up to Generals of the readiness of their units with respect to equipment and programs.
You, sir, need a medal for having said that. In all my years, I haven't had any luck trying to explain to people that equality is not achieved by forcing everyone to do everything. Rather it is achieved by letting the people who can do something well enough do it. The fact that there are TWO different kinds of human genders should provide a clue enough for understanding that MAYBE they are supposed to be good at different things. Exceptions exist, but we don't make rules to establish exceptions; we make rules despite the exceptions. When the stakes are as high as in the Special Forces, the first objective is to strive for completion of the mission and then comes survival; gender equality has its places, this is not one.
@@oldrageface8706 it's unfortunate because people whan men and women to be equal but it's just not true, it's not a bad thing to be different at all! , but socially people just want to accept it
@@alanoh3069 Okay, but the fact on its own is not unfortunate. It's just unfortunate that some people want total equality. Personally, I find it very positive that men and women are different :)
@@coreywilliams570 like he said, mix women in a male dominate sport and see what happens. Women are already complaining about transgenders joining their sport. Not to mention it's an Alpha environment. I'm all for a woman mixing with males if she can pull her own wait, but the Alpha male mentality won't accept her, just like women wouldn't accept a male in an all woman environment. I don't know why a woman would want to be around a bunch of men like this. We are some crazy ass MF. Maybe one day, but not now, I we won't accept it.
@@DeWayneDrumgole The military is not an all men environment. So your saying the problem is not with the women it's with the men. LOL, so basically women can't do the job because men are sexist. LOL WOW Funny how i was able to serve with women and my sister also served. And we didn't have a problem. Maybe the problem is not with them but you.
Why not mandate that fifty percent of NFL Cheerleaders should be male? Because it is absurd that's why. So is mandating that women must be navy seals, or Delta force, or army rangers etc...
This question was asked at an Open Discussion at my university: I was the only person in the room who was military trained and had been deployed.The ladies in the room instantly started calling me sexist, misogynist, etc... Well until, I told them an extremely graphic story about a female helicopter pilot that was captured, raped and tortured. The room was completely silent and as I walked back to my chair I said "There are some things in this world that aren't worth experiencing first hand."
I'm glad you were able to show them a piece of reality. I'm a female and consider myself to be rather fit and capable but I still understand that there is a vast difference between men and women. I would never consider joining spec ops or anything of the sort, it would unbalance the group. Good on you for sticking up for yourself against the feminists, if they want equality they should have to pass the same physical fitness the males have to pass.
Men time the grass in the backyard to sync its development with our boredom. A symbiosis of sorts. That’s my synopsis. Not with beer 🍺 that’s a bad combination. One must mow with whiskey. Perhaps a semi dark rum soaked/ aged (since it Can soak without aging) in bourbon barrels for a year. Or so I claim.
I am a female and nothing irritates me more than saying we are all equal in these kind of areas. We are not. There is a difference between challenging yourself and putting yourself on the line and others. I will not be lifting a 20 or 30kg wieght just to prove a point, stuff that, if a guy volunteers he is more than welcome to it and I will more than appreciate it. There is a huge physical difference in the sex's, and I agree with what this guy is saying.....
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted. According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle. According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
This is what an intelligent person looks like. There are no put downs or rude comments being made whatsoever about women. Simply calm, collected, and thoroughly explained detail and facts.
Andrew Very true. however it is beyond irritating to have to explain something as simple and intuitive as this to people with an agenda. So while we are required to meet bad ideas with good ideas it is not 100% required to have to bend over backwards to be nice about it. Sometimes, the extreme ignorance the feminists come so aggressively with, demands an equally strong rebuke. We are under no obligation to have to patiently guide these folks through basic common sense. Most of them know better anyway. They are simply driven by far leftist ideology and must be encountered and defeated. As nicely as possible. But not at risk of being ran over. Kind when possible, but always strong and fearless.
Nunya Business That’s true, I think my point is that it’s hard to ignore what he’s saying when there is so much nuance and intellect put behind his assertions. I think more people would be willing to listen to a guy like this who has a deeper understanding of group dynamics and can objectively explain the difference. My personal opinion is that people who are not willing to understand this are just simply never going to get it and will gladly take the opportunity to name call if they want. It’s their choice, but at least he is smart enough not to descend into yelling, name calling, and all the like. That is a waste of time and pretty much puts you in the same boat as those people. You don’t have to prove something to people who are there to accuse and complain, just walk away.
Andrew i think we agree. What I remind myself is that it is worth the effort to show patience and respect sometimes, but for the listener in the audience, rather than the insolent journalist asking the question.
Mike is a very intelligent individual, he trains dogs for special operations, and in doing so learned how their mind works, including how humans minds work and operate as well. He has his own podcast which has had great interviews. He’s a jack of many trades.
I was in the Marines for years. One of the ways that we exercised was to carry a comrade on our shoulders and Sprint a hundred yards. We had women in our unit, because it was a Headquarters Company. The women couldn't lift most of the males, nor could they run and carry one. In combat, if a comrade gets wounded, you might have to carry them. Some women may be able to bear such a burden, but I wouldn't bet my life on it. Call me crazy.
I helped administer PT tests to females, as a female. I can't even count how many cheated. I saw everything from women refusing to even attempt to hit 90 degrees on a pushup, to literally bouncing their legs off the floor, and worse. Didn't make a lot of friends, and wound up giving up administering it cause it was so upsetting watching the blatant cheating. The standard is already lower for women, and the fact that most women I saw weren't even hitting that really upset me. Tried reporting it to higher ups, no one listened or did anything. And when I looked at the guys doing their pushups during the tests, 98% of them were doing it correctly. And when they weren't, and you called it out to them, they corrected it.... When my husband was in the fire service, alot of women there got pushed through without actually meeting the standard either, especially on the military side. One lady actually told him that if he died in a fire because some woman can't pull him out, "that's the price we all have to pay for equity". I can't really think of a more arrogant, self absorbed and idiotic thing to say, especially when the wife and kids are ones who foot that bill, not her
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted. According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle. According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
We need to change the word, common sense, to be called rare sense, in which you are a human with able cognitive skills, capable of making rational decisions.
When I was 17 (33 now) in high school, my football team had a few girls try out. All of them did great until we put the pads on. I'll never forget the first hard tackling drill we learned was angle pursuit. My coach saw I was paired up with one of the girls and pulled me aside. I was already 6'0" and rapidly approaching 270 lbs. at that age, but coach got in my face. "If you don't hit her as hard as you hit anyone else, you will play JV for the rest of the year." Cut to poor Emily getting completely earholed, with a severe concussion, ambulance immediately called, etc. I don't have a problem with women playing sports or anything else. But if my coach had not threatened me like that, I'd have probably laid off the throttle on every hit after that. And that's precisely why this argument is a big deal. When you talk life and death, there is no discussion. Whoever hits harder wins. And women don't.
Well for a couple weeks after I was jokingly called a woman beater by random people. Emily and all of the girls eventually quit during tryouts. Most of the guys did take it easy on the girls when paired up because Emily had gotten such a severe concussion. And i began seeing what my coach was getting at. During school, she didn't even look at me for like two weeks while i tried to apologize. Eventually she heard what coach had told me and forgave me. She never really wanted to even play football except to be our kicker. We eventually also had the Army recruiters come into the school and do fitness tests on people, and she did very good. They did stuff like how many pushups and pullups you could do. How fast you could run two miles. And climbing a rock wall. She actually did great but never went for the Army dream. She went onto community college and i believe works for child protective services. Not sure if that's what you guys wanted to hear lol. Immediately after the hit i just remember her laying there lifeless while they used ammonia salts to wake her up. She threw up, cried, and they put her on a stretcher to cart off the field. She had some trouble with lights at school for about a week after too. Severe concussion ain't no joke. At the end of the day i felt horrible about it. And it definitely made me aware of how fragile some people can be. I've known tough women in my life, but I'll never agree with the premise a single one of them are fit for special forces next to men. A battlefield is just no place for a woman. Can't change my mind Steven Crowder.
That's what they did for the 2 women who "passed" the Ranger test. Gave them special treatment and let them have multiple "Do-overs" to get them through. They didn't pass like the men had to.
@@SealofPerfection Source on that please? We know for a proven fact males and do their BUD/S several times over after failing it. But a female would have to pass on the first attempt? That just sexists and setting women up to fail. Yes those who served know approximately 34 percent of students who enter Ranger School fail and are allowed to redo it 3-4 times. Why our Perishers have never been beaten. One small mistake during the course and your career is over and you are immediately removed. No man alive in the US can match a single female JEDI Master pilot capable of flying through a Star Wars canyon at full speed hitting a wombat sized target inside a turn flying cold stick. The men who tried? Died ... Simple. No do-overs.
@@MrFlatage firstly, the women you speak of were able to have special treatment in the fact that they were able to redo the whole course, 34% of those who failed usually only get to do ONE. and out of hundreds of applicants in a year maybe a dozen males get that treatment. Secondly, "perishers", "perishers military", "perishers group" comes up with nothing on any site or search engine I use, so please do give me these "Jedi" women you speak of. Thirdly, show me a woman without google that can outperform in endurance, strength and speed a male counterpart within the military. Also lastly if we're talking extraordinary pilots, Douglas Bader, look him up, he had more disadvantages than anyone else at the time so I'd really like your "Jedi" women to fly the plane he did, perform half as well with his same conditions. Lastly. It isn't "sexists" most men DON'T get to retry a bunch of courses, they often DON'T get to have special prep and they often DON'T have the PE standards changed for them, the women did, either they perform EXACTLY like the typical male candidate is to perform or they aren't accepted and the typical Male candidate only gets one retry on a course or two.
@@glaucomflecken you're an idiot. Wouldnt she be in the best position to know? Also as this person mentioned, 99.9% of special ops agree. Probability states that her brother would be apart of this 99%. You obviously are part of the idiotic 1%
@Kelly MD Royal World Health MD - If you kill the first female President of the U.S., does that mean that every single soldier in the entire United State Military will also die? Wow you picked the wrong metaphor and anatomy. We are not ants and we don't govern like ants. And you shouldn't click a "thumbs up" on your own post, it makes you look desperate if it's the only one you have.
Not sure if I follow for sure, but I think I get your point and that is true that men throughout history have often gone to battle for women. Behind every warrior is a woman he wants to get home and see, a baby daughter, a sister a mother etc that he wants to keep the enemy away from. This is a driving factor for many men. Either direct and obvious or by the general ways of man and tribe man seeks to expanding his culture, build his empire and spread his seed which is based around attracting, obtaining, reproducing with and protecting women.
Kelly MD Royal World Health MD Yeah, that’s why they don’t have the queen ant going out and gathering or defending the hill. Where is the relevance? We’re not ants, we’re not a hive mind, and we don’t depend on just one female to produce all of our offspring.
@@rustcohle9267 "lowering height eligibility" what kinda rude fuck r u to say "lowering standards", just cuz he's got a small height this means he's a low grade athlete and basketball player, ur such a fucking prick bruh, grow the fuck up
The essence of Spec Ops is playing to the strengths of a unit. When you're talking about putting women on a force that primarily functions on the edge of human, specifically male, physical capability, you will almost certainly experience problems during deployment when those physical requirements cannot be met. What is said here is very much on the same line as that; Play towards their strengths. I can see all-female Spec Op units being more effective in a number of specific operations environments, like said in the video because of access, but also through networking and disguise. The military is function over form stripped down to it's core. Spec Ops is taking the best parts of any individual and tailoring them to a specific operation they will excel in. The best parts of women isn't brute strength, nor physical endurance, so why leave all other qualities in the dust?
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted. According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle. According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
@@Anonymous18817 For starters, don't be a female. Once your chromosomes are XY instead of XX, you have a chance. Or you could face reality and recognize that the only way you're going to make it through the program is by cheating. Maybe YOU won't cheat, but politicians will cheat on your behalf. For a parallel, look at Kara Hultgreen's story - the first female Navy fighter pilot. She received multiple downs (3?) during her primary flight training. "Downs" are failure egregious enough that a single "down" is usually enough to end a pilot's course of training. She was denied further training until she wrote her congressman/senator. The politicians held up the promotion of the next CINCPAC until she was allowed to "graduate". This unsafe, less-capable pilot was making a carrier landing when she IGNORED "WAIVE OFF" INSTRUCTION, failed to go around, overcorrected, stalled the port side engine and crashed the plane, killing herself. She almost killed her RIO as well, but his seat ejected a fraction of a second earlier than hers - throwing him into the air instead of underneath the crashing aircraft. Here's video of the crash. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kara_Hultgreen The cause of the crash was plain pilot error. If you want to be the "Kara Hultgreen" of the Navy SEALs, go right ahead. But you're delusional and anything you get will not be something you earned.
There is a girls high school track team who are upset that a transgender is now winning and they say it’s taking away scholarships from them because in an event where they might place second, now they place third so on and so forth
@@rusty7984 Only with a huge and unfair biological advantage. Why do you think sports are gendered separated? She may be a woman in her brain, but her body is something else.
Dude, I think one of the coolest parts of this video is that fact that the interviewer ACTUALLY LET THE GUY TALK, instead of fighting him lol!!! I get so sick and tired when I see "interviews" where the guest gets asked a question, and then the interviewer spends almost the whole time arguing with the guest...the points made were very solid too, but its the format that really stood out to me. Keep things civil, let people articulate their points clearly, and its amazing how much more enjoyable things can be! Keep it up, and never change guys, its very impressive!
When it comes to any military, it should determine who would be the BEST in combat that should come before any political reason or statement. The goal would be to be successful in any objective given by that person in command. I thank all those had and currently in …. Appreciate your service 🇱🇷
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted. According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle. According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
Thank you for your honesty! As a competitive athlete and a female in the military I have been asked this question time and time again by other women and they are always so surprised when I say that women within this occupation of the tactical arena is not a good idea. In fact, many women who are not even IN the military have argued with me otherwise... this just goes to show the lack of knowledge of what the SF job actually entails, simply to achieve a personal agenda for "unbiased" inclusion rather than ensuring that we have the strongest fighting force.
I agree, there are plenty of elite forces where women can and want to be in. When it comes down to biology and which sex has evolved to have more muscle, it is men that have that advantage. Women have other strengths and advantages, of course, this is just not one of those cases.
@@firstnamelastname6016 I agree. Too many people misunderstand equality. I'm very much for equality, but, equality doesn't mean the same as. We should all appreciate our individual strengths. There's nothing wrong with acknowledging that there are certain areas where one gender, as a whole, would be better. I have several family members who have served, male and female. I'm just going to mention two, though. My great aunts were Marines during WWII.They were specialists (not sure if that's the correct term) They were fit, could shoot, and were highly intelligent. No way they would have been a good fit for special ops, though, and that's okay. They proudly served, and that's what matters. I like his idea of separate teams of women.
The guy in the video said cis women and trans people could fit the requirements to be a Navy SEAL. The two of you are insisting on keeping them out anyway which means you're sexist and transphobic (yes, a woman can be sexist).
@@sadem1045 Whiny babies? Ha ha ha ha you don't even know any of us. All I'm hearing is someone who got butthurt because somebody else has a different opinion than you, so you resorted to name calling. Grow up. I didn't agree with everything he said, but he was respectful and had a well thought out argument. I can respect that, even if I don't agree with everything. It's called being an adult.
Just imagine having a conversation about ask whether black people should or shouldn't be in the US military...…………………..oh they did didn't they. He is using the Israeli example, to cover up his US hypocrisy. This Is this is not a black and white issue. There are historical example such as the Second World War or in the anti-colonial war that shows that women have been instrumental in some of the most significant events in world history. This conversation is about misogyny and myth and is fundamentally gender segregationist twaddle.
Yeah, I say that to myself a lot. A reminder that not all men are created equal, I see a guy like Jocko or this dude and I'm like, "yeah, I'm basically a five year old girl compared to these beasts" Hard to be macho when you cryin in the corner...
@@harvestcanada are you crazy, we are not talking about G.I.'s we are talking about the best of the best. There is no Sport where the Men and Women can compete at the top level, hence separation. Mike even said he acknowledges Womens contribution in the military.
It depends. I think in certain cases it would be an advantage. One, our enemies know that we don’t use women so it could be an advantage. Second, a man and a woman are less scrutinized than two men. Third, women excel at different things then men. Like in Stalingrad they found women are perfect snipers because they have the patience a lot of men lack. They also gave them some old WW1 type biplanes and in the freezing cold would go bomb the German lines and were called the “night witches” and again had tremendous success. There is no easy answer but I do believe that there are situations where they would do better than men and others where they will never measure up.
@@marquisdelafayette1929 That's exactly what this guy said in the video! He said women could potentially excel in other areas. Men and others, what others. We already mentioned women and men. There's no "others" left. Male and female two real genders in existence!
Hmm so why are there less women pilots, engineers, or higher positions that don’t require physical prowess? This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard. This idiot is comparing a combat sport billed to entertain to that of making a living by putting your life on the line for your country. Goes to show that just because you are in a role of experience, definitely doesn’t mean you’re not an idiot in other roles like this dumbass.
Also facts, other the the notion of gendered sports name one thing that wasn’t anecdotal? Facts? You’re an idiot if you find any of this opinionated uninformed information factual. Idiot!
@@kenz0692 To pilots the same thing applys like to infantry. Men are generally faster than women when it comes to reaction time or making decisions. Let's come to the engineers: If you look outside the army there are also very few female engineers just like there are very few male nurses. This has to do with evolution. Evolution had the effect that women generally have more emphathy which makes them perfect nurses. And the same applys to engineering. Regarding the higher positions: This again can be explained with evolution, men have an easier time managing and directing groups of people. Now you might say that comparing the modern human to a cavemen is dumb or doesn't make sense, or that these mechanisms aren't needed in todays society which is completely right. But the problem is that mechanisms that have been developed and in place for thousands of years don't just dissapear in a few decades.I also wanted to say that i think that women should take more represented espacially in higher positions and in the military. But i also know why it isn't the case and that isn't always because they aren't allowed to do certain things but because they aren't able to do them.
@@kenz0692 He is comparing the combat sport to the military in specific areas and not in generall. Through this example he shows how men are usually stronger than women and why that matters in the military as well. It's just a simple comparison.
Honestly the entire idea of women having more time to run a mile or have to do less sit ups to meet requirements for military is bad. I mean military is military, everyone gets the same requirements, you think the enemy cares about your gender? You think they would shoot you with smaller bullets on less accurate guns cuz of your gender? You think they would show you mercy if captured? I think not Edit: all I’m tryna say is increase the standards of women’s requirements so they’re the same as mens
are the current standards gendered? I don't think "any person who can run x distance in x time and do x number of pushups qualifies" is gender specific. It should stay that way, lowering standards to be in the highest tier of warfighters will, like you say, get people killed.
Cheesus Sliced In the USMC women have more time to run there minimum mile and a half, and got to only be able to do 1 pull up or hang on the bar for 30 second I believe while men gotta do 3 minimum
@@troyjoseph7472 doesn't really matter if they are tougher than most men and women if they are still not up to a marine standard. Lowering standards only does just that: it lowers your standards. Performance is lessened for the sake of appearances. They need to move back to a single, higher standard.
Great answer. He is right women can't do everything a man can. I'm a woman and I whole heartily agree. Proud daughter of a Marine. Leave feelings out of the military
@@aliceshaw8265 Theology = Belief in GODs. Do "Leftists" have a name for their GOD? Are there no "Conservative" agnostics or atheists? From a Muslim (theist) perspective are you not a heathen? Indistinguishable? Can you not notice a difference between a snail and a bonobo? Baloney you say?
When the feminist movement began AGAIN in modernized “we can do it” way of approach...it will only get worse the media is pushing women hard these days a male can’t say shit without being labeled some type of nonsense because it goes against LOGIC
I am a 20 year Navy Vet. For 20 years I had to perform at a higher level than my female counterparts when it came to physical readiness; had to do more push-ups, more sit-ups and had to run faster. One standard needs to be applied evenly across the board. The enemy doesn't cut you slack because of your gender, why does DoD?
I’m going to say it. Brace yourselves……how do you manage your period in the field? And when all is fair in war, if I were the enemy, I would train dogs to sniff that out.
Recently in NYC a cop could have lost his life because he had an incapable female partner. She just watched as a teenager was beating her partner up. Luckily it was only a beating. But it could have been much worse.
Probably because some roles are expected to be more physical than others? You guys sound pretty weird in how you want to limit the military when there is no data whatsoever to support the notion that combat effectiveness is in ANY way negatively affected by the presence of women. You're just trying to protect your boy's club. Man is seriously asking why someone half his size/muscle mass didn't have to bear *the same physical load* as him. Who knows, chief, maybe... physics? Maybe you don't live in a country that has the recruitment numbers to sustain a one-gender military? Maybe it's antiquated nonsense to even try?
As a female that served in the Army as Military Police, I have to agree with this guy. I think there are some really mentally and physically strong women out there but at the end of the day they don't compare to most men in Tier 1 operation groups. It is my experience that a lot of the men in a unit end up carrying their own weight as well as the weight of their female counterpart. I've seen it. Females do not belong in any kind of special operations forces.
@@kuifjehaddock5451 of course you don't care if a woman takes the job instead of you. You don't have a group of men you'd have to give your life to protect. A woman can't possibly carry a wounded 200 pound man with excess gear 6 miles to safety including her gear. Its impossible even if she's injected with the highest grade testosterone. There are lives on the line and women aren't emotionally built for that kind of stress. Biologically their structure isn't built to handle that weight physically and mentally speaking. Their bone density is significantly less than a healthy man. Women have their places in many things but special operations is and never will be their route and that's okay. The world is unfair, and if a woman is upset about that than she is 100% not ready to be in special forces because emotions don't exist there. There's a job to do and that's it.
If they cannot keep up then allow them to fall under the weight of their own incompetence. The issue seems to be more about the male instinct to protect women than anything else. Perhaps not by every male but the males in charge.
This is actually a great interview. The SEAL explains everything without being condescending or rude while substantiating the whole argument with facts and being logical throughout, and the the interviewer actually listens without interrupting him every 5 seconds.
@Sam no one said women in military is bad. Just admitting there are things men can do and women can not and vice versa. Also like his point on a full women spec ops unit similar to Israel. I can see such a unit having success depending on missions ie overwatch, snipers, scouts, Intel collecting, etc. Just dont be afraid to recognize weakness and optimize strengths.
I’m an athletic girl, but I wouldn’t attempt this. Definitely changes the dynamic and in a life or death situation I’d honestly rather have a guy show up than a girl. I don’t want someone who had to do less testing to qualify
You know what l airborne infantry in the army then a cop l partnered with a female officer for a number of years she was bright smart brave but was 5’3” and 130 lb was athletic in high school now a mother of two and never lifted a weight in her live. I liked working with her but when l was face with a 6’4 260lb drugged dude do think l wanted her or another guy? Well that happened and l was just plain lucky but do you want combat soldiers to rely on luck because most females to keep up would need hour and a half in the gym each day
@@loganw1232 most of the women I know are pretty normal really, they don't care about politics or political correctness or any of that other bs, they're just normal people living normal lives it's the loud, annoying extremists that try to speak for the silent majority among them
NB my friend's sister was the UK's first female fighter pilot. She passed all the tests the men did, and aced them. Ain't nothing wrong with dat. Women can be fast reacting and intelligent. I'd say a top girl is extremely quick witted, but when it comes to physical endurance and strength... it isn't fair to compare. The males are the soldiers. The amazons of legend used a bow.
I served with US Army Special Operations / Special Forces and you can call me a hater or whatever. But I don't think woman belong in Special Operations Forces, period. Yes not all woman are the same in more ways than physically. And yes i believe there are a select few who would do just fine in Special Operations in every way without lowering training and unit standards. But that BY FAR, isn't the majority of woman. But not lowering the standards for woman isn't realistic unfortunately. What happens is standards will be lowered in whatever areas in order to push more woman through in the name of political correctness and so the military can prove they're "equal". This as already been shown with the somewhat recent woman who have passed Ranger school. Numerous candidates in those classes including a few instructors (anonymously) have come out and said yes things were changed or and tweeked even in the slightest bit for these females to give them a better chance/higher % chance to make it. Even if in very small ways (doesn't have to be huge leaps). Lowering standards only has to start with one unnoticeably small small change/step. It will only grow from there until the standards for men and woman are night and day clear. This is all just my garbage opinion of course.
US Navy here, the special programs I went through personally I seen standards lowered for men too. Politics are politics and they'll always be there, but once the PR slows down on things like that I think you could expect the pipeline to hold strong, the seals are real good at that. By far this isn't the majority of women that will make it through i agree, but it's by far the majority of men too, that's the whole point of the pipeline process. don't you think if a pipeline designed to weed out people that cant do the job is effective, then gender shouldn't matter as long as they can perform? the physical prowess argument, in my opinion, is bullshit because thats the whole point of buds. The only problems i can see arising are sexual assault/harassment and the men having an ego complex about working with women which is an issue with the mindset that men are indoctrinated into. If they treated them as just another team member and they can do the job, what other reason could there be?
@@whitneyw.7919 Very true. And even fewer woman. And if the Army kept the standards across the board for men and women alike. The amount of woman that made it would be then deemed a failure by the Army. Like I said, political correctness. Feelings over standards.
Tom Smith That’s not the point of this entire discussion at all. The particular problem being disputed here is lowering the standards for the average women to join the military. Let me spell it out for you: _Lowering the standards_
It makes sense, it all boils down to effectiveness and purpose. Does it make sense to have women carry 100lbs of gear and patrol all week? Probably not. Makes sense to have female snipers several hundred meters from the engagement? Probably a better fit. I definitely agree that making apples equal to oranges is not the way to go.
Violent_Bebop a female sniper would have to carry that 100 lb gear (that you mentioned) into and out of a war zone daily. Are you aware of a rifleman’s gear? Have you even ever served bro?
@@joesmith389 - Where is it written in the laws of physics that a person must carry 100lbs everywhere to complete task? I get it, grunts be grunts. Snipers come in all forms weak or strong. The best sniper the viet cong had was a woman. She killed a lot of "rifleman" carrying their 100lbs of gear.
The irony of this is that a lot of female athletes n sportswomen don’t want coed sports or events because they know they don’t stand a chance against men and would no longer be at the top of their game.
in MMA i can easily break multiple ribs with a single elbow or knee strike on a male... thats one of the reason i never seriously fight female opponents... i dont want to to cave in their entire rib cage... hell they cant even do anything to me in Grappling based martial arts due to a difference in body weight...
Yea. Serena Williams says it all the time when she's asked. Do you think you could play guys, and she says hell no. Its a whole different beast. And we know she stays at the top of her game.
I spent 9 years in the US Army, 7 in the Infantry and 2 years with a Long Range Surveillance Detachment. The training I went through in the 1980's & early 90's no female could have met the physical standards & completed rigorous training.
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted. According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle. According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
@@Anonymous18817 Honestly, that MOS isn't suitable for a woman. Here's why I say that. Not only is the training rugged, but the ability to carry a male team mate for miles over difficult terrain is nearly impossible for a female. Also, ammo is not unlimited like in movies, you only carry 240 to 300 rounds of ammo. Which is quite heavy. If you're pinned down and low on ammo, you might have to fight hand to hand. You're exhausted, sleep deprived, hungry, and you have to physically fight a man in close quarters combat. It ain't like in the movies where the Black Widow jumps on a man's neck, swings him to the ground. Punches him and knocks him out. That's Hollywood and it's a lie. You are not going to be fighting in an ideal situation where you're well rested, fed, and the guy is the same size or smaller than you. Being combat arms sucks, long nights, humping a heavy ruck, being hungry and sleeping in the rain. It's not glamorous, it's pain. If you cannot carry a male team member 2 or 3 clicks over rugged terrain to get to an LZ in 3 hours when you're tired and hungry and injured yourself, then you are believing what Hollywood fed you. I'm just being honest. Good luck.
@@Anonymous18817Hate to break your drive but no woman on this planet has passed BUD/S, like you said most women who have tried it have had very serious injuries. There's a woman who promotes other women not even attempting it because she has irreversible health issues from even trying, one of those becoming sterile and no longer being able to have children. Men and women are different physically, to our bone mass and muscle tissue, it's just not something you can hope for equality with.
@@YoJaYmaNz Who’s the woman? I don’t care about fertility, I’ll never have kids anyway. Women have the biological advantage in endurance, muscular stamina and enduring the cold.
there s no women who passed bud s do you know what that means? you can t eather! if they have biological adavantages why men always on top and there are no women in averything? just lool long distance runners its about endurace but winner will be always a man @@Anonymous18817
@@rg8445 the ban for women has been lifted for several years now and the Marine basic has been watered down drastically since 2017 (opting pullups for pushups... Gimme a break) The other issue lies in the fact that females can be impregnated as casualty of war, and then it's not just a liability, but it becomes basically a heinous act of self sacrifice that wasn't needed in the first place.
@@Cronuz2 Yes, I listened... to the *professional* that said the presence of women changes the dynamic of our fighting force. You virtue signaling incels just need to give it up. It's not the way you are going to get a woman to sleep with you.
Straight onto the path of personal attacks. Why would you even think you could guess at my personal life? and that benefit too you?.. don't answer, it was rethorical. That dynamic could change to the better. I servered with several women who did excellent. And i truly believe that we should let those who are best suited for a task do it, and not base it upon the gender. Just a heads up for the future; you somewhat screamed "i have a low iq and i go for personal attacks because i dont know how to behave." Me, or anyone else passing on knowledge in your direction is absolutely wasted.
I was a freshman rower in a light weight (70kg per person) men’s eight, (trained 7 times a week) and at the end of the year we were and still are (20 years later) faster than the Dutch national record for professional women 8+. And only 2 seconds behind the world record by Romania for womens 8+. These were women who were heavier, had more muscle’s and trained full time for years and years with better technical skills. And they had better equipment. Though I had a good team, that wasn’t the reason why we were faster. It seemed like our muscles could produce more power and had more stamina without being overdeveloped or trained on top level.
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted. According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle. According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
Where is the same determination to make women sign up for the draft mandatory? These women see rights like a buffet table. Picking and choosing what they want.
@@effygoodwin37 All 18 year old males still have to sign up for selective service. Which is the draft. Do you think that if a massive war broke out there wouldn't be a draft again? Just because we haven't used it in a long time doesn't mean it cant be used again.
@@TheBothvar Nope, the US won't use the draft again. The Vietnam War and the political shitstorm the draft caused throughout the 1960s and early 70s put an end to it. Selective Service will probably be abolished at some point. What the military does now when there is a big war on is change enlistment standards and offer more bonuses and other incentives for people to join - and they can just 'recycle' their manpower and extend their active service (known as stop-lossing). That's why in Iraq and Afghanistan, you had Army soldiers doing 15 month tours and you have many guys with 3 or more deployments in their 1st enlistment. That's basically the model the military uses for conventional wars now. Politicians and military leaders learned after Vietnam that the public don't give as much of a shit when it's all-volunteer servicemen dying in wars. They might virtue signal with TYFYS platitudes, but at the end of the day, people know what they're signing up for. If you mean literal WW3... yeah, that will go nuclear within a few weeks, so no draft needed, as everyone will be fucked anyway.
Effy Goodwin I agree with most of that however the US death toll in Iraq was not even close to Vietnam. When the chips are all the way down. I’m willing to bet they will use it as a last resort.
I don't think I have watched a YT video at less than 1.75x in over a year. Watching other platforms at the std 1x is almost painful for me to watch now, lol!
All I can say is if they can pass the test without handicap. all power to them. If they have to dilute the testing to get people to pass it defeats the purpose
Unfortunately, its not that simple since women in a male group also changes the group dynamic and may drag the group down even if she is fit for service... Just the human mindset
@@ganondorkdagreat9234 There isn't a single female that has passed even the pre screening process. Having enough people to form a whole unit would be pretty unlikely to put it mildly.
@@ganondorkdagreat9234 That was the exact recommendation made. Even a capable women would likely make the unit less effective. If women want to be in special forces so badly then they need their own unit that does a different assortment of things and has different screening parameters (so you would actually have enough to build the unit). There is no world where women will work well together with men in war. Doesn't matter if she's butch, ugly, married, anything, men do not act the same way when there is a female present. Just think about the dynamic when you're hanging with the boys, or when there is any female present. It's completely different.
In many accounts in history, it's often a symptom of a dying culture when women are pushed into masculine roles and loose sexual standards. There are only 2 types of societies/groups that allow women in combat.... Desperate populations that NEED ANYONE who can wield a weapon (like cities under siege or Russia in WWII), and barbaric societies. There are no other exceptions.
I mean the answer is easy to me: whoever can complete the training without any help or special treatment can do it. Dont change the rules to make it easier for women, but also dont hold them back if they can do it.
You're missing the point, women in the same highly trained and specialized units as men creates problems. And as the gentleman said, "Does this make us a more effective warfighting force? No." The women should have their own SOF unit in each branch or just under JSOC. You can't have males and females in units like these, expecting them to train up, deploy and operate in these incredibly dangerous and stressful missions without creating problems that will undermine their efficiency as a team. That only works in Hollywood. Let them have their own legacy, their own unit, their own name.
spyderTL and for gay men or women? Would you have to then weed out and seperate them as well? What about racists who supposedly cannot function in a professional environment with someone of a different race? Do you see how this whole separate but equal argument is such a slippery slope into ludicrousness?
PewDiePie Subscriber #3457238 the problem with what your saying is that in the military especially the marines things like harassment which is what your implying would happen is taken extremely seriously and is grounds for potential termination the things is if something like this were to happen it’s more than likely to be shut down immediately so no you need not separate them because there is no open homophobia or racism that could negatively affect the team
Sesshomaru Uzumaki as a woman, I don’t want to work with the best of the men b to the best of the women. Alpha females and males don’t work well in battle environments, period
@@zookboy5714 Fun fact... nobody cares what sexuality or race you are. I mean bringing up sexuality doesnt even make any sense. If you're in Special operations you probably act pretty masculine so nobody can tell
If a woman can pass the test then all power to her, but we shouldn’t lower standards to be woke. I’d love to see a lady become a seal, but not by lowering the standards
Yes this. Same standards for everything if you make it you make it, if you don’t you don’t. Gender doesn’t play a role. Lowering the standards for some lowers the capabilities of the whole.
the problem is as country you can be woke or realistic you can not say be woke here but not there thats not how things work since when you have woke people that vote what you think they will vote for?
"Does this make us a more affective war fighting force? In my opinion, no it doesn't" HE'S ABSOLUTELY right. The calmness by which he spoke says a lot about how deadly he can be. Nothing but respect for the Navy SEALS ✊🏾
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted. According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle. According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
@Nyree Harris Women know their role. Men know their role. Unless you are beastly women with more testosterone than the average woman, then go back to the kitchen girlfriend. You know exactly where you belong, your feelings are just hurt, be honest.
You’re argument is invalid just like males only service members who are already in the service and prove themselves can be put into special forces “ if they want “ it’s a decision ( not mandatory). A draft would be taking anyone and everyone who is qualified and at random. There are women in the military with more balls than you and can achieve more
@@josetarango4030 So, women shouldn't be held to the same standards that men are held to simply because they're in the military under voluntary reasons right now just like men are? Nice strawman you built there.
@@andrabook8758 military standards and quotas should never be dropped.... that's accepting a weakening of military standards. The human race as a whole should only be increasing it's standards such as being faster, stronger, smarter, etc., .
Opening the military for women is not an issue in my book, when they can deal with the same standard. But lowering the standard for diversity is dangerous crap.
I'm not really sure if I agree with that because what if they have biases that are unsupported and ate not in the best interest in creating a more effective fighting force
@@Aaron-wq3jz Damn right they'll have a bias and they're in the right too. They're the ones fighting and dying. If anyone knows what it takes to do their job well its them. I wouldn't come to your work without any experience at it and try to dictate to you what will make you more effective.
@@chrismaldonado2989 that's great that they have the most experience but we've seen that throughout history that that type of self government can be detrimental. I dont care what you've done no one should have the right to be biased based on feelings and prejudice
If by 'snowflake' you mean zoomer, then I'm a snowflake that agrees with everything this man said, but yeah most of my generation are a bunch of betas.
Yep, Olympic level women tend to be almost on par with a good high school boy's team...almost. Any good HS boy's team, for example, would destroy any WNBA team, or the women's Olympic team. Easily. They wouldn't beat any state champ boy's teams, wouldn't even make it far in the playoffs of most states. There are loads of stories about pickup guy's teams scrimmaging against national champ women's teams in college and easily beating them. We're talking guys where most of them didn't even play HS ball. I A good HS boy tennis player would destroy, easily, Serena Williams. The world record women's 100 meters is roughly a .5 seconds slower than the HS boy's record. Look at driving distance in golf. The women's high jump record is 6.8 feet. HS boy's is 7.5 feet. You can go on and on. None of these sports are life and death. MMA is close, and nobody wants to see a woman take on a man in that. But make it combat, life and death, and people are all for putting women with special forces who are the best of the best? Ridiculous.
@@aliceshaw8265 Probably more so in business. But in something like sports that may not be the case. Not everybody’s going to be a Usain Bolt or LeBron James or a Schwarzenegger no matter how hard they try.
@@aliceshaw8265 They tried implementing females in the Ranger school with no special treatments. When the women were failing miserably , a general who is known to push for leftist ideas lowered the standards so low that it caused outrage in the ranks, but two females were able to pass, but not by Rangers standards. The saddest part is they gloat that they passed Ranger school when it was actually given to them for political purposes.
Wish I could ask a question as an interviewer. He said the purpose of the seals is to be most lethal, successful, and effective team. If there were an instance where a woman in the navy were the 1st in (perhaps) medic skills or sniper, wouldn’t you want her on the team? Gender aside, I want whoever is most accurate for their specific job. If your job is to be the biggest/strongest person on the team, idc if you’re a guy or girl- size matters 😂
The way I see it, if you can't throw a 175 to 200 pound man on your shoulder and carry him out of the danger zone, then you shouldn't be on the battlefield.
That’s all well and good and nice. But we’re talking about war. If you cant throw a 175+ human to THE GROUND, and be very damn sure that you can KILL, possibly with your bare hands.... then you definitely shouldn’t be FIGHTING on the battlefield. Medics, support, transport, etc. Those roles, maybe if they can sling someone over a shoulder, pass the physical, give em a job ON the battlefield. *Combat* is a different fucking story. I don’t want women ( OR ANYONE ) from my country to be deployed somewhere, that we won’t be reasonably assured that THAT soldier, whomever the fuck they are, has a literal fighting chance. We cannot continue to disservice our countrymen and women in the armed forces ( more than we tragically already do ) by sending them to combat they just cannot win, based on sex or gender or whatever the fuck it is.
@@nobodiesthetiger785 40-60 pounds of gear EACH. And that's BEFORE the rucksack. EVERY SINGLE TIME I was ever in training with women they did NOT give the same performance as the males. End of story. 82nd Airborne. VERY damn few females, and the ones we DID have were kept out of the way in the aid station.
The only people that would potentially be saddened by this is women who want to be navy seals... and chances are they're mentally strong enough to not let this get to them.
Mixing females into combat units inherently changes the dynamic of that unit. Men, from an evolutionary psychology standpoint, have an innate sense to preserve female life and will sacrifice everything to ensure that. Mission success can not afford to be derailed by biological imperatives
The comparison with the MMA really blew my mind. It is actually insane. They are not willing to have men and women fight in sports but when it comes down to the ACTUAL BATTLEFIELD, LIFE & DEATH SITUATION they are like noooooooooo, get them together. The stupidity of it is in truth palpable.
This is definitely the best argument for keeping woman from these jobs but its still flawed. Combat is not MMA. It's a lot of walking, vehicle and weapons maintenance, navigation, communication, leadership, and much more. I would venture to guess that 99.9999% of people who have ever served in the military have not entered hand-to-hand combat with the enemy. So unlike the very specific subset of athletics that is MMA, where two opponents are competing to win a hand-to-hand fight, the small nuances matter less. Its the same reason MMA uses weight classes and strict weigh-ins before fights. Every little detail is exponentially impactful on the outcome of the competition. Combat arms jobs, however, are a much more complex set of tasks with an unlimited amount of factors differentiating one soldier's strengths from another's.
They actually had a semi-skilled man (Fallon Fox) fight in the women's division of Bellator. He was winning by completely overpowering women that had better skills than him.
@@AmyRoulette They also don't have to carry their injured team mates out of the ring in fake wrestling. I'm all for women in any role in the military. What I am against is lowering entrance criteria. There are certain branches of the military that the strongest and fittest men have a hard time passing the entrance test and an ever harder time getting through training. The requirements to enter those elite units are the same for everyone and need to remain at a very high standard to maintain the integrity of these units. It's the same with basketball. The NBA doesn't say women can't play in the NBA there just haven't been any women good enough to make the cut to this point.
Women are in various special operation forces. Either sex can land a little bird onto a road in the middle of Iraq during a fire fight as part of SOAR.
@@dazza5286 pretty sure most take a form of birth control that stops periods. That and if the body is put under enough stress theyll quit having them anyways.
Ha ha ha ha. No, "The Little Mermaids". Kind of like "Space Command". "To infinity and beyond." Jesus, help us, or Buddah, Mohammed, Krishna, whom ever.
The difference is even though most men aren't fit enough they are ALLOWED to TRY. Most women aren't fit enough so people are saying they should be legally barred from trying. Half of the comments talking about "differences in men vs women" are completely missing the point. MOST PEOPLE CANNOT AND WILL NOT MEET SPECIAL OPERATIONS STANDARDS. What is between their legs is not a reason to create laws saying who can and can't tryout.
@@denniswilliams2190 No, what we see again and again is as soon as you open up a combat position to women, the women fail and start complaining that the standards are too tough and that they need a different lower set of standards.
@@David35687 lol I was with you until you started making up your own facts. Please cite where "again and again" we saw widespread issues of "women starting to complain about the standards being too tough so they were lowered". Were standards lowered for pilots when females were allowed? Were standards lowered at Ranger school for female candidates? What about Airborne school? And please not your own version; cite a news article or something damn. I'll grant that it was wrong back in the day to make female vs male PT standards but I doubt it was because women complained; it was likely because females could only serve in support roles anyways and the military would love to fill its support roles with able bodied people even if they aren't in top shape.
"whats your concern since it hasn't happened yet?" maybe we should be asking WHY it hasn't happened. There are no women in the SEALS because there are no women who have met the requirements and succeeded in the training. Shoehorning women in, lowering the standard, simply because you can, is going to cause problems just the same as lowering the standard for men who would otherwise fail.
@@Teixas666 yes would be horrible but it would probably be looked at as a sexist statement towards "WoMeN" and then they would riot and want a law to pass that all female military be served testosterone to have a chance at beating their male counterparts then people would make fun of them and I would then laugh like this, ha
They tried implementing females in the Ranger school with no special treatments. When the women were failing miserably , a general who is known to push for leftist ideas lowered the standards so low that it caused outrage in the ranks, but two females were able to pass, but not by Rangers standards. The saddest part is they gloat that they passed Ranger school when it was actually given to them for political purposes.
Anyone psychologist will tell you even throwing one women into a group of men, changes the whole dynamic of how that group operates.
I can say that you are 100% correct. I started off in coed unit's as a navy Seabee, and eventually went over to the army and became an infantryman..... Far less drama and "fraternizing/ playing favorites" and scandalous shit going on in an all male unit.
Dynamics change all the time. People adjust. Whether it's loosing a team mate, a new guy joining the group, whether it is when blacks were allowed to join the military, or when they were allowed to integrate. You don't think unit cohesion and dynamics wasn't an argument then? Or when women were allowed to serve as pilots or on submarines. The truth is people evolve. And it usually works out. 10 years after women really start serving as SoF people will look back on this the same way.
@@LordSStorm I see what you're saying, but that's like comparing apples and oranges. From a social standpoint, integrating men and women is completely different from integrating different races or a new guy. The best you could hope for is women and men to be treated EXACTLY the same in every way (never gonna happen). And even then, there would still be disparity because there will always be some form of sexual tension from one side or the other.
@@LordSStorm Those are adjustments, not changes.The dynamic of a male group has been virtually the same since before the military even existed. The seals has always been men only. It should stay that way. It works
@@coastshooterkills4614 Its totally true. No one is saying they cant operate with females. IT throws off the dynamic of the teams. Read Dr David Buss and you will understand.
"No experiments when peoples lifes are on the line" 👏 - there is nothing to add to that line.
@The Wraith
That's not the same thing at all. Keeping the peace among civvies and trying to protect a convoy in the middle of Falluja are two very different things.
In the military period. The military should not be a social experiment.
The Wraith oh boy. Police are not the same level as military 😂🙄
@The Wraith The difference is that one deals with civilians who are likely not going to threaten your life in anyway. If they do they are most likely not trained and don't have military caliber weapons. The other deals with being outnumbered in a foreign country where half the population absolutely despises you and wants to kill you. They have military grade weapons and some will literally kill themselves just to kill you.
@The Wraith
Civvies don't have snipers shooting at cops. They don't have RPGs and Dual-mount 23mm autocannons. They don't have IEDs. They don't have mortars with ice in them so that by the time you triangulate the mortar, there's no one there. You get the picture, bro?
As a female who was in a military combat position(went in as MP but my rate covered multiple jobs based on my command)I can definitely say they’re huge differences in the makeup of males and females. I was the most in shape female at my command however I was still only average compared to the males. It’s just the way it is. I was good at my job but even better at things that didn’t require my body to break down. There’s beauty in differences. I literally told another woman I don’t feel safe working with her because they had to change a physical standard for her and gave her a passing score in order for her to deploy with us on time… I even to this day believe that the female prt scores need to exactly match the mens because at the end of the day if we’re all deploying together we should pull the same weight. War doesn’t discriminate. And if you can’t pass the standard test across the board then the military shouldn’t be for you. Just my two cents for ppl to get triggered over.
I agree with you, Ma'am, and thank you for your service!
I am triggered haha jk but kidding aside I hope more people especially those in authority think like you.
Preach sister.
Women have significantly less testosterone than men which is literally responsible for mens speed and strength. Surely you all see there’s physiological and biological differences so why should we then treat both the same. Men and women are both equal in value in society yes but being equal in value does not and should not mean same roles or equal roles. There are some things women will always be better at and there are other things men will always be better at. It really is that simple but people love to blur the lines. I heard go the big pharma is the one who profits the most from putting young kids on a lifetime of hormones (changing sex) so they fund it. I’m not a conspiracy theorist but that’s a pretty reasonable take… also some people say some woman are as fast and strong as men well they’re an exception to the rule and if they pass the standard for making it as a soldier or marine etc then fine but lowering the standard because they are not male and they’re female is not the way forward. If you are an exception to the rule then the rule shouldn’t be changed for the sake of woke just because a few made it… I fully agree with you by the way, we should play to the strengths of each other in everything. If we tell everyone ok men and women can compete, in the end the women will lose unfortunately and how’s that fair for them? So much for equality
Stop larping as a woman, basement dweller. "female"
I'm a woman. 23 years in the Army and I agree with his message.
Thank you for your service.
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted.
According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle.
According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
@Yellow Brand I wouldn’t take that offer. I don’t want special treatment, I want to be held to the same standards as the men.
@@Anonymous18817 Do you go on all these and post the same stuff? Get a life.
@@Anonymous18817: Transition into a man.
Why can't people just accept that men and women generally excel at different things. And complement each others abilities generally.
@TeddyBearKnows Exactly. It's a lack of humility. We need to start playing to one another's strengths.
One answer, feminism!
Generally *Jordan Peterson has entered the chat*
I think people do. There is a tiny minority that does not, and we gave them the power to control our media, which makes everyone feel as if they were the norm.
I can pretty much count on one finger the people I know that support this Bullshit. Basically one out of 500? Maybe? That is pretty much the percentage of nutcases that existed since humanity does.
Well said.
The military should never be used to push socio/political agendas.
👏👏👏
I don’t think theres a single military in the history of mankind that hasn’t had a socio/political agenda at some point in their history tbh
@@justicegutierrez6847 that doesn't deny the fact that they shouldn't
william ladd I agree with this interview and his logic. Buuut your comment. If I’m not mistaken the US Army, the military in general played a huge role in leading the way for spark of the civil rights movement and rightfully so.
LOL
The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal ~ Aristotle
Learn from history or you will be doomed to repeat it.
Worst form of "injustice"
@@hanniballecter5383 thank you for the correction.... :-) ... I fixed the quote
@@rudiekazu actually i wasn't correcting you, you got the quote right the first time, i was just suggesting that using the word injustice would have been better 😅
@@hanniballecter5383 ....lol
I will keep making this argument until someone can tell me otherwise, but female POWs versus Male POWs create a very complicated problem
This is a really good point.
I remember hearing that a female operator was taken POW in Desert Storm. They got her out... and then she disappeared. No after-action report was declassified.
Everything this man said was 100% true
Facts if she isn't a femme fatale/spy she shouldn't be side by side by Marines that are a average of 250lbs and can eat 15-20 bullets to the chest
What did he say??? 😂
I'm at the beginning of the video anyways. I will watch it.
Demi Moore disagrees!
Definitely
@@jonahda0mega you have no idea what the hell you are taking about. Marines don't average 250 lbs bud. Not even close.
As a female veteran, I agree with his assessment 100%.
Salute to you for your service! Huh!
@@nasaihyana thank you
Thank you for your cervix.
Just a joke. Hoah!
@@alaskayoung3413 bwahaahaha
if the men who make up the Special Forces Navy Seals Green Berets Force Recon Marines Delta Force had the mentality of a lot of females no country on Earth would mess with us because they would be some of the most heartless ruthless Shameless unfeeling individuals known to mankind
Can’t believe we even need to have this discussion...
Dude, it's fucking crazy. Because of PC culture and feminism half the population has been brainwashed to believe women can do anything a man can do. Which is true to an extent, but there ain't no women in the NFL or NBA or MLB, and that ain't because they're not allowed, lol!
Changed the 69 likes to 70. Now somebody hand me a Nobel prize
IKR 😂😂😂😂
We don't. People just keep pandering to feminists. If men as a whole told women to shut up and quit their whining, what could they do? Fight us?
People are getting dumber
i am a marine vet , 20 + years in service , retired as a master gunnery sgt , i agree a 100 percent with this fellow vet
What does a master gunnery sgt do ?
@@Ealdorman_of_Mercia the Master Gunnery Sergeants lead at the Battalion level or higher, all the way up to Force levels, advising Majors all the way up to Generals of the readiness of their units with respect to equipment and programs.
Just accept men and women are different, men can do things women can't, women can do things men can't, just an unfortunate fact of life!
for instance last i checked women make excellent rescue divers...
You, sir, need a medal for having said that. In all my years, I haven't had any luck trying to explain to people that equality is not achieved by forcing everyone to do everything. Rather it is achieved by letting the people who can do something well enough do it. The fact that there are TWO different kinds of human genders should provide a clue enough for understanding that MAYBE they are supposed to be good at different things. Exceptions exist, but we don't make rules to establish exceptions; we make rules despite the exceptions. When the stakes are as high as in the Special Forces, the first objective is to strive for completion of the mission and then comes survival; gender equality has its places, this is not one.
Why unfortunate?
@@oldrageface8706 it's unfortunate because people whan men and women to be equal but it's just not true, it's not a bad thing to be different at all! , but socially people just want to accept it
@@alanoh3069 Okay, but the fact on its own is not unfortunate. It's just unfortunate that some people want total equality. Personally, I find it very positive that men and women are different :)
The nerve of this guy...who the hell does he think he is making all this damn sense
@Neil Hood Hahaha you got that from Dave Chapelle right? 🤣
Call Jaaaa
If a women can pass all the physical test. I don't see why they can't do it.
@@coreywilliams570 like he said, mix women in a male dominate sport and see what happens. Women are already complaining about transgenders joining their sport. Not to mention it's an Alpha environment. I'm all for a woman mixing with males if she can pull her own wait, but the Alpha male mentality won't accept her, just like women wouldn't accept a male in an all woman environment. I don't know why a woman would want to be around a bunch of men like this. We are some crazy ass MF. Maybe one day, but not now, I we won't accept it.
@@DeWayneDrumgole The military is not an all men environment. So your saying the problem is not with the women it's with the men. LOL, so basically women can't do the job because men are sexist. LOL WOW Funny how i was able to serve with women and my sister also served. And we didn't have a problem. Maybe the problem is not with them but you.
He’s just being logical which is hard for these social justice warriors to accept.
Yes, reason and logic are tools of oppression used by the patriarchy!
@@Jone952 So we should all lose reason and logic? That sounds ridiculous...
@@rojasuriel527 I agree it is absurd
Because logic isn't a thing for them except if it's their version of it.
Why not mandate that fifty percent of NFL Cheerleaders should be male? Because it is absurd that's why. So is mandating that women must be navy seals, or Delta force, or army rangers etc...
This guy is 100% correct.
This question was asked at an Open Discussion at my university: I was the only person in the room who was military trained and had been deployed.The ladies in the room instantly started calling me sexist, misogynist, etc... Well until, I told them an extremely graphic story about a female helicopter pilot that was captured, raped and tortured. The room was completely silent and as I walked back to my chair I said "There are some things in this world that aren't worth experiencing first hand."
I'm glad you were able to show them a piece of reality. I'm a female and consider myself to be rather fit and capable but I still understand that there is a vast difference between men and women. I would never consider joining spec ops or anything of the sort, it would unbalance the group. Good on you for sticking up for yourself against the feminists, if they want equality they should have to pass the same physical fitness the males have to pass.
G De Souza you a king
Good show on you !
these are the moment I wanna take a loudspeaker and say "Easier said than done!!"
anyways did she get rescued??
@@lordeddardstark4471 Yeah......
I remember when this was not questioned because everyone knew the answer.
@Enemy Of moron LOLOL! I just HAD to keep reading. Dang them double-spaces sentences. LOLOL!!!!!!
Oh they still know the answer. P.C. culture stops them from speaking truth.
God thats the sad thing, we all know! But we must all pretend......
Men time the grass in the backyard to sync its development with our boredom. A symbiosis of sorts. That’s my synopsis. Not with beer 🍺 that’s a bad combination. One must mow with whiskey. Perhaps a semi dark rum soaked/ aged (since it Can soak without aging) in bourbon barrels for a year.
Or so I claim.
Donna? Answer the questions
I like this reporter, he sits and listens and doesn't interrupt
this is the first time he is like this....he is usually horrible
Imagine if he was talking to Alex Jones LOL he wouldn’t get two words in
thats what a reporter is *supposed to* do
Arse Licker Probably bc the guy he’s talking to is an uber alpha who would snatch his heart out in a second.
meanwhile political correct reporter: *interrupts* sO yOu aRe sAyIng wOmEn ArEn't cA...
I am a female and nothing irritates me more than saying we are all equal in these kind of areas. We are not. There is a difference between challenging yourself and putting yourself on the line and others. I will not be lifting a 20 or 30kg wieght just to prove a point, stuff that, if a guy volunteers he is more than welcome to it and I will more than appreciate it. There is a huge physical difference in the sex's, and I agree with what this guy is saying.....
"I am a female"
Putting others on the line. That's the more to reprehensible part.
Your soldier weighs triple that, we need proof you can carry your soldier back home to their family
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted.
According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle.
According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
@@Anonymous18817 girl keep it to yourself and proof everyone wrong because everyone is close minded on the subject expect to be treated like sh***t
This is what an intelligent person looks like. There are no put downs or rude comments being made whatsoever about women. Simply calm, collected, and thoroughly explained detail and facts.
Andrew
Very true.
however it is beyond irritating to have to explain something as simple and intuitive as this to people with an agenda.
So while we are required to meet bad ideas with good ideas it is not 100% required to have to bend over backwards to be nice about it.
Sometimes, the extreme ignorance the feminists come so aggressively with, demands an equally strong rebuke.
We are under no obligation to have to patiently guide these folks through basic common sense. Most of them know better anyway. They are simply driven by far leftist ideology and must be encountered and defeated.
As nicely as possible. But not at risk of being ran over.
Kind when possible, but always strong and fearless.
Nunya Business That’s true, I think my point is that it’s hard to ignore what he’s saying when there is so much nuance and intellect put behind his assertions. I think more people would be willing to listen to a guy like this who has a deeper understanding of group dynamics and can objectively explain the difference. My personal opinion is that people who are not willing to understand this are just simply never going to get it and will gladly take the opportunity to name call if they want. It’s their choice, but at least he is smart enough not to descend into yelling, name calling, and all the like. That is a waste of time and pretty much puts you in the same boat as those people. You don’t have to prove something to people who are there to accuse and complain, just walk away.
Andrew i think we agree.
What I remind myself is that it is worth the effort to show patience and respect sometimes, but for the listener in the audience, rather than the insolent journalist asking the question.
Mike is a very intelligent individual, he trains dogs for special operations, and in doing so learned how their mind works, including how humans minds work and operate as well. He has his own podcast which has had great interviews. He’s a jack of many trades.
And these aren't the types that win wars. You can't be concerned about others' feelings when you go to war.
I was in the Marines for years. One of the ways that we exercised was to carry a comrade on our shoulders and Sprint a hundred yards. We had women in our unit, because it was a Headquarters Company.
The women couldn't lift most of the males, nor could they run and carry one. In combat, if a comrade gets wounded, you might have to carry them. Some women may be able to bear such a burden, but I wouldn't bet my life on it. Call me crazy.
I agree. I checked the demographics and unsurprisingly women make an insignificant minority in combat roles.
They could cook
@@gambaridup 🤣😂that right
Me I'm 240 lb ain't no woman going to carry me in the middle of combat
@@gambaridup bitch can cook me my last meal before i die in that situation
Who is so blind to reality that they think he’s incorrect? Every word was common sense. Sad this is even a discussion.
If a women can pass all the physical test. I don't see why they can't do it.
@@coreywilliams570 SIMP!
@@coreywilliams570 "If" being the operative word...
@@winningjubbly9712 yep, that why i wrote it.
@@coreywilliams570 you dont see the psychological aspect? how naiv
I helped administer PT tests to females, as a female. I can't even count how many cheated. I saw everything from women refusing to even attempt to hit 90 degrees on a pushup, to literally bouncing their legs off the floor, and worse. Didn't make a lot of friends, and wound up giving up administering it cause it was so upsetting watching the blatant cheating. The standard is already lower for women, and the fact that most women I saw weren't even hitting that really upset me. Tried reporting it to higher ups, no one listened or did anything. And when I looked at the guys doing their pushups during the tests, 98% of them were doing it correctly. And when they weren't, and you called it out to them, they corrected it.... When my husband was in the fire service, alot of women there got pushed through without actually meeting the standard either, especially on the military side. One lady actually told him that if he died in a fire because some woman can't pull him out, "that's the price we all have to pay for equity". I can't really think of a more arrogant, self absorbed and idiotic thing to say, especially when the wife and kids are ones who foot that bill, not her
That selfishness you describe at the end is exactly how many women think. Yes. I believe it 100% because I've seen it again and again and again.
Although I would like to suggest that perhaps the man dying foots the bill even more than his wife and kids. 🤦 Hilary.
You just explained the dating game and double standards without trying
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted.
According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle.
According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
@@realamericannegro977Yeah she did bro lol
The fact people get offended over someone being logical like this is proof how sensitive people are now days..
If only they could just continue forward with logic and just ignore all these people...😑
Also shows how illogical people have become.
You mean how everyone is getting offended by everything
@C Freesus LMAO my man
We need to change the word, common sense, to be called rare sense, in which you are a human with able cognitive skills, capable of making rational decisions.
When I was 17 (33 now) in high school, my football team had a few girls try out. All of them did great until we put the pads on.
I'll never forget the first hard tackling drill we learned was angle pursuit. My coach saw I was paired up with one of the girls and pulled me aside. I was already 6'0" and rapidly approaching 270 lbs. at that age, but coach got in my face.
"If you don't hit her as hard as you hit anyone else, you will play JV for the rest of the year."
Cut to poor Emily getting completely earholed, with a severe concussion, ambulance immediately called, etc.
I don't have a problem with women playing sports or anything else. But if my coach had not threatened me like that, I'd have probably laid off the throttle on every hit after that. And that's precisely why this argument is a big deal.
When you talk life and death, there is no discussion. Whoever hits harder wins. And women don't.
Daaaaaamn. What was the aftermath of poor Emily?
Yeah what happened? Don’t leave us hanging.
Well for a couple weeks after I was jokingly called a woman beater by random people. Emily and all of the girls eventually quit during tryouts. Most of the guys did take it easy on the girls when paired up because Emily had gotten such a severe concussion. And i began seeing what my coach was getting at.
During school, she didn't even look at me for like two weeks while i tried to apologize. Eventually she heard what coach had told me and forgave me. She never really wanted to even play football except to be our kicker.
We eventually also had the Army recruiters come into the school and do fitness tests on people, and she did very good. They did stuff like how many pushups and pullups you could do. How fast you could run two miles. And climbing a rock wall. She actually did great but never went for the Army dream.
She went onto community college and i believe works for child protective services.
Not sure if that's what you guys wanted to hear lol. Immediately after the hit i just remember her laying there lifeless while they used ammonia salts to wake her up. She threw up, cried, and they put her on a stretcher to cart off the field. She had some trouble with lights at school for about a week after too. Severe concussion ain't no joke.
At the end of the day i felt horrible about it. And it definitely made me aware of how fragile some people can be. I've known tough women in my life, but I'll never agree with the premise a single one of them are fit for special forces next to men. A battlefield is just no place for a woman. Can't change my mind Steven Crowder.
@@Castle24 wow... good story. Thanks
@@redplanet76 you're welcome hah
Step 1: Women will meet the same standards as men.
Step 2: .00000001% of women meet the standards.
Step 3: Lower standards and weaken the unit.
That's what happened to the P.T. test.
Pretty true it just weakens it
That's what they did for the 2 women who "passed" the Ranger test. Gave them special treatment and let them have multiple "Do-overs" to get them through. They didn't pass like the men had to.
@@SealofPerfection Source on that please?
We know for a proven fact males and do their BUD/S several times over after failing it.
But a female would have to pass on the first attempt?
That just sexists and setting women up to fail.
Yes those who served know approximately 34 percent of students who enter Ranger School fail and are allowed to redo it 3-4 times.
Why our Perishers have never been beaten. One small mistake during the course and your career is over and you are immediately removed. No man alive in the US can match a single female JEDI Master pilot capable of flying through a Star Wars canyon at full speed hitting a wombat sized target inside a turn flying cold stick.
The men who tried? Died ... Simple. No do-overs.
@@MrFlatage firstly, the women you speak of were able to have special treatment in the fact that they were able to redo the whole course, 34% of those who failed usually only get to do ONE. and out of hundreds of applicants in a year maybe a dozen males get that treatment.
Secondly, "perishers", "perishers military", "perishers group" comes up with nothing on any site or search engine I use, so please do give me these "Jedi" women you speak of.
Thirdly, show me a woman without google that can outperform in endurance, strength and speed a male counterpart within the military.
Also lastly if we're talking extraordinary pilots, Douglas Bader, look him up, he had more disadvantages than anyone else at the time so I'd really like your "Jedi" women to fly the plane he did, perform half as well with his same conditions.
Lastly. It isn't "sexists" most men DON'T get to retry a bunch of courses, they often DON'T get to have special prep and they often DON'T have the PE standards changed for them, the women did, either they perform EXACTLY like the typical male candidate is to perform or they aren't accepted and the typical Male candidate only gets one retry on a course or two.
My brother was a seal but sadly passed away 4 years ago. Think he’d agree 100% to what this guy said
Your brother is a legendary soldier
Nobody asked what your dead brother would've agreed to.. stop insulting his memories..
@@glaucomflecken You are such a negative asshole let the memories of the soldier live on and stop trying to repress them you fucking asshole
@@glaucomflecken Your opinion is worthless
@@glaucomflecken you're an idiot. Wouldnt she be in the best position to know? Also as this person mentioned, 99.9% of special ops agree. Probability states that her brother would be apart of this 99%.
You obviously are part of the idiotic 1%
In Germany women can join the KSK but no women has ever been able to pass the test
At least they didn’t lower their standards. The US military will lower standards to get women into these units. It’s fucking disgusting.
Randall W and I reply with no those physical standards keep people alive
Exactly bro.......I read it in Wikipedia...
Not only that....later I watched videos about KSK. They are really, really tough.
Same in France
Feminist: "There are men that can't even do it!"
Me: "Yeah, no shit. It's by design."
@Kelly MD Royal World Health MD you missed something there. We're not fucking, ants.
@Kelly MD Royal World Health MD are you a ant if you are a ant then it should work for you not for human LoL
@Kelly MD Royal World Health MD - If you kill the first female President of the U.S., does that mean that every single soldier in the entire United State Military will also die? Wow you picked the wrong metaphor and anatomy. We are not ants and we don't govern like ants. And you shouldn't click a "thumbs up" on your own post, it makes you look desperate if it's the only one you have.
Not sure if I follow for sure, but I think I get your point and that is true that men throughout history have often gone to battle for women. Behind every warrior is a woman he wants to get home and see, a baby daughter, a sister a mother etc that he wants to keep the enemy away from. This is a driving factor for many men.
Either direct and obvious or by the general ways of man and tribe man seeks to expanding his culture, build his empire and spread his seed which is based around attracting, obtaining, reproducing with and protecting women.
Kelly MD Royal World Health MD
Yeah, that’s why they don’t have the queen ant going out and gathering or defending the hill.
Where is the relevance? We’re not ants, we’re not a hive mind, and we don’t depend on just one female to produce all of our offspring.
I’m white, I’m 5’5 and people like me are woefully under represented in the NBA. The government needs to do something immediately.
Waiting for them lowering the standards so you can be a star in the NBA.
@@rustcohle9267 "lowering height eligibility" what kinda rude fuck r u to say "lowering standards", just cuz he's got a small height this means he's a low grade athlete and basketball player, ur such a fucking prick bruh, grow the fuck up
@@zainshah2697 are you feeling ok? Never seen someone get so mad so fast lol
@@zainshah2697 you’re missing the point. He’s being facetious, it’s a joke
@@zainshah2697 chill, he did not state the height but the standard.
The essence of Spec Ops is playing to the strengths of a unit.
When you're talking about putting women on a force that primarily functions on the edge of human, specifically male, physical capability, you will almost certainly experience problems during deployment when those physical requirements cannot be met. What is said here is very much on the same line as that; Play towards their strengths.
I can see all-female Spec Op units being more effective in a number of specific operations environments, like said in the video because of access, but also through networking and disguise.
The military is function over form stripped down to it's core.
Spec Ops is taking the best parts of any individual and tailoring them to a specific operation they will excel in.
The best parts of women isn't brute strength, nor physical endurance, so why leave all other qualities in the dust?
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted.
According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle.
According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
@@Anonymous18817 For starters, don't be a female. Once your chromosomes are XY instead of XX, you have a chance.
Or you could face reality and recognize that the only way you're going to make it through the program is by cheating. Maybe YOU won't cheat, but politicians will cheat on your behalf.
For a parallel, look at Kara Hultgreen's story - the first female Navy fighter pilot. She received multiple downs (3?) during her primary flight training. "Downs" are failure egregious enough that a single "down" is usually enough to end a pilot's course of training. She was denied further training until she wrote her congressman/senator. The politicians held up the promotion of the next CINCPAC until she was allowed to "graduate".
This unsafe, less-capable pilot was making a carrier landing when she IGNORED "WAIVE OFF" INSTRUCTION, failed to go around, overcorrected, stalled the port side engine and crashed the plane, killing herself. She almost killed her RIO as well, but his seat ejected a fraction of a second earlier than hers - throwing him into the air instead of underneath the crashing aircraft. Here's video of the crash. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kara_Hultgreen
The cause of the crash was plain pilot error.
If you want to be the "Kara Hultgreen" of the Navy SEALs, go right ahead. But you're delusional and anything you get will not be something you earned.
There is a girls high school track team who are upset that a transgender is now winning and they say it’s taking away scholarships from them because in an event where they might place second, now they place third so on and so forth
Clear proof that men and women are not the same physically. Thank you!
@@rusty7984 Only with a huge and unfair biological advantage. Why do you think sports are gendered separated? She may be a woman in her brain, but her body is something else.
MALA2243
Read the edited comment
boomboom9291 Call them transgender people, they are people too
How in the fuk did this happen in the first place?fuking liberal shitheads
As a former combat veteran, shit like this will get men killed in the line of duty...
How?
@joey Lopez
How does it feel to be in combat . Do you get nightmares ?
China: hmm you don’t say ...:)
hey dont say the s word thats a bad word
th-cam.com/video/LCDqwx2IQ2o/w-d-xo.html
Dude, I think one of the coolest parts of this video is that fact that the interviewer ACTUALLY LET THE GUY TALK, instead of fighting him lol!!!
I get so sick and tired when I see "interviews" where the guest gets asked a question, and then the interviewer spends almost the whole time arguing with the guest...the points made were very solid too, but its the format that really stood out to me. Keep things civil, let people articulate their points clearly, and its amazing how much more enjoyable things can be! Keep it up, and never change guys, its very impressive!
Connor Baz th-cam.com/video/sel1EL0P6Jg/w-d-xo.html
Agree,I hate when they don’t let the person finish talking
You’re right, but It’s a sad sign of the times where a journalist should be rewarded for allowing their guest to speak.
Tell joe Rogan that
I'm not fond of the name valuetainment. But this guy is a very good interviewer.
When it comes to any military, it should determine who would be the BEST in combat that should come before any political reason or statement. The goal would be to be successful in any objective given by that person in command. I thank all those had and currently in …. Appreciate your service 🇱🇷
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted.
According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle.
According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
Thank you for your honesty! As a competitive athlete and a female in the military I have been asked this question time and time again by other women and they are always so surprised when I say that women within this occupation of the tactical arena is not a good idea. In fact, many women who are not even IN the military have argued with me otherwise... this just goes to show the lack of knowledge of what the SF job actually entails, simply to achieve a personal agenda for "unbiased" inclusion rather than ensuring that we have the strongest fighting force.
I agree, there are plenty of elite forces where women can and want to be in. When it comes down to biology and which sex has evolved to have more muscle, it is men that have that advantage. Women have other strengths and advantages, of course, this is just not one of those cases.
@@firstnamelastname6016 I agree. Too many people misunderstand equality. I'm very much for equality, but, equality doesn't mean the same as. We should all appreciate our individual strengths. There's nothing wrong with acknowledging that there are certain areas where one gender, as a whole, would be better. I have several family members who have served, male and female. I'm just going to mention two, though. My great aunts were Marines during WWII.They were specialists (not sure if that's the correct term) They were fit, could shoot, and were highly intelligent. No way they would have been a good fit for special ops, though, and that's okay. They proudly served, and that's what matters. I like his idea of separate teams of women.
The guy in the video said cis women and trans people could fit the requirements to be a Navy SEAL. The two of you are insisting on keeping them out anyway which means you're sexist and transphobic (yes, a woman can be sexist).
It's part of the military which means there's no room for whiny babies like you and this douchebag.
@@sadem1045 Whiny babies? Ha ha ha ha you don't even know any of us. All I'm hearing is someone who got butthurt because somebody else has a different opinion than you, so you resorted to name calling. Grow up. I didn't agree with everything he said, but he was respectful and had a well thought out argument. I can respect that, even if I don't agree with everything. It's called being an adult.
"Women can't do everything Men can do. Also Men can't do everything other Men can do" - Joe Rogan
Oliver North put in the work and time and am sure others can
Just imagine having a conversation about ask whether black people should or shouldn't be in the US military...…………………..oh they did didn't they.
He is using the Israeli example, to cover up his US hypocrisy. This Is this is not a black and white issue. There are historical example such as the Second World War or in the anti-colonial war that shows that women have been instrumental in some of the most significant events in world history.
This conversation is about misogyny and myth and is fundamentally gender segregationist twaddle.
Yeah, I say that to myself a lot. A reminder that not all men are created equal, I see a guy like Jocko or this dude and I'm like, "yeah, I'm basically a five year old girl compared to these beasts" Hard to be macho when you cryin in the corner...
@@harvestcanada are you crazy, we are not talking about G.I.'s we are talking about the best of the best. There is no Sport where the Men and Women can compete at the top level, hence separation. Mike even said he acknowledges Womens contribution in the military.
women can't spell their name in the snow so there.
I can’t believe we are even having this discussion.
welcome to our current world
SEXIST🤣😏🤭
if a woman is mentally and physically strong enough to pass all the tests with no handicap then I don't see a problem
@@madelinemckinney8706 bc ur a female.. of course u don't see a problem.. did u not watch the video?
exactly
This gentleman is right on! He explained it perfectly and respectfully
The fact that we're even discussing this shows how far we have fallen from just understanding basic human physiology. So sad.
Second you bruv
Bingo.
Instead of saying here why can’t you join sports team before u say stuff about human physiology?
It depends. I think in certain cases it would be an advantage. One, our enemies know that we don’t use women so it could be an advantage.
Second, a man and a woman are less scrutinized than two men.
Third, women excel at different things then men. Like in Stalingrad they found women are perfect snipers because they have the patience a lot of men lack. They also gave them some old WW1 type biplanes and in the freezing cold would go bomb the German lines and were called the “night witches” and again had tremendous success.
There is no easy answer but I do believe that there are situations where they would do better than men and others where they will never measure up.
@@marquisdelafayette1929 That's exactly what this guy said in the video! He said women could potentially excel in other areas. Men and others, what others. We already mentioned women and men. There's no "others" left. Male and female two real genders in existence!
this man is talking absolute facts. Very smart person
I mean I would expect that from a Navy SEAL
Hmm so why are there less women pilots, engineers, or higher positions that don’t require physical prowess?
This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard. This idiot is comparing a combat sport billed to entertain to that of making a living by putting your life on the line for your country.
Goes to show that just because you are in a role of experience, definitely doesn’t mean you’re not an idiot in other roles like this dumbass.
Also facts, other the the notion of gendered sports name one thing that wasn’t anecdotal? Facts? You’re an idiot if you find any of this opinionated uninformed information factual. Idiot!
@@kenz0692 To pilots the same thing applys like to infantry. Men are generally faster than women when it comes to reaction time or making decisions. Let's come to the engineers: If you look outside the army there are also very few female engineers just like there are very few male nurses. This has to do with evolution. Evolution had the effect that women generally have more emphathy which makes them perfect nurses. And the same applys to engineering. Regarding the higher positions: This again can be explained with evolution, men have an easier time managing and directing groups of people. Now you might say that comparing the modern human to a cavemen is dumb or doesn't make sense, or that these mechanisms aren't needed in todays society which is completely right. But the problem is that mechanisms that have been developed and in place for thousands of years don't just dissapear in a few decades.I also wanted to say that i think that women should take more represented espacially in higher positions and in the military. But i also know why it isn't the case and that isn't always because they aren't allowed to do certain things but because they aren't able to do them.
@@kenz0692 He is comparing the combat sport to the military in specific areas and not in generall. Through this example he shows how men are usually stronger than women and why that matters in the military as well. It's just a simple comparison.
Honestly the entire idea of women having more time to run a mile or have to do less sit ups to meet requirements for military is bad. I mean military is military, everyone gets the same requirements, you think the enemy cares about your gender? You think they would shoot you with smaller bullets on less accurate guns cuz of your gender? You think they would show you mercy if captured? I think not
Edit: all I’m tryna say is increase the standards of women’s requirements so they’re the same as mens
are the current standards gendered? I don't think "any person who can run x distance in x time and do x number of pushups qualifies" is gender specific. It should stay that way, lowering standards to be in the highest tier of warfighters will, like you say, get people killed.
@@Cheesus-Sliced There are gendered requirements, at least in the USMC. I am currently enlisted myself
Cheesus Sliced In the USMC women have more time to run there minimum mile and a half, and got to only be able to do 1 pull up or hang on the bar for 30 second I believe while men gotta do 3 minimum
Cheesus Sliced so yes the military does have genders specific standards, but don’t get me wrong a female marine is 100% a bad ass
@@troyjoseph7472 doesn't really matter if they are tougher than most men and women if they are still not up to a marine standard. Lowering standards only does just that: it lowers your standards. Performance is lessened for the sake of appearances. They need to move back to a single, higher standard.
Great answer. He is right women can't do everything a man can. I'm a woman and I whole heartily agree. Proud daughter of a Marine. Leave feelings out of the military
Then dont get the right to vote?
When did the TRUTH become “controversial”?
Politics: C-19 a case in point, the mother of all manufactured crises!
When the sheep whined loud enough
@@aliceshaw8265 Theology = Belief in GODs. Do "Leftists" have a name for their GOD? Are there no "Conservative" agnostics or atheists? From a Muslim (theist) perspective are you not a heathen? Indistinguishable? Can you not notice a difference between a snail and a bonobo? Baloney you say?
When the feminist movement began AGAIN in modernized “we can do it” way of approach...it will only get worse the media is pushing women hard these days a male can’t say shit without being labeled some type of nonsense because it goes against LOGIC
@@1Skeptik1 yes there are conservative non-believers. Maybe most are really Libertarians.
I am a 20 year Navy Vet. For 20 years I had to perform at a higher level than my female counterparts when it came to physical readiness; had to do more push-ups, more sit-ups and had to run faster. One standard needs to be applied evenly across the board. The enemy doesn't cut you slack because of your gender, why does DoD?
I’m going to say it. Brace yourselves……how do you manage your period in the field? And when all is fair in war, if I were the enemy, I would train dogs to sniff that out.
@@Dleefrlula lmao smart.
@@Dleefrlula Uruk Hai Warrior : *Sniff sniff* Time of the month
Recently in NYC a cop could have lost his life because he had an incapable female partner. She just watched as a teenager was beating her partner up. Luckily it was only a beating. But it could have been much worse.
Probably because some roles are expected to be more physical than others? You guys sound pretty weird in how you want to limit the military when there is no data whatsoever to support the notion that combat effectiveness is in ANY way negatively affected by the presence of women. You're just trying to protect your boy's club.
Man is seriously asking why someone half his size/muscle mass didn't have to bear *the same physical load* as him. Who knows, chief, maybe... physics? Maybe you don't live in a country that has the recruitment numbers to sustain a one-gender military? Maybe it's antiquated nonsense to even try?
As a female that served in the Army as Military Police, I have to agree with this guy. I think there are some really mentally and physically strong women out there but at the end of the day they don't compare to most men in Tier 1 operation groups. It is my experience that a lot of the men in a unit end up carrying their own weight as well as the weight of their female counterpart. I've seen it. Females do not belong in any kind of special operations forces.
@@kuifjehaddock5451 LOL, I agree cause after they get drafted it will be the end of there Feminist/Communist movement.
@@kuifjehaddock5451 of course you don't care if a woman takes the job instead of you. You don't have a group of men you'd have to give your life to protect. A woman can't possibly carry a wounded 200 pound man with excess gear 6 miles to safety including her gear. Its impossible even if she's injected with the highest grade testosterone. There are lives on the line and women aren't emotionally built for that kind of stress. Biologically their structure isn't built to handle that weight physically and mentally speaking. Their bone density is significantly less than a healthy man. Women have their places in many things but special operations is and never will be their route and that's okay. The world is unfair, and if a woman is upset about that than she is 100% not ready to be in special forces because emotions don't exist there. There's a job to do and that's it.
If they cannot keep up then allow them to fall under the weight of their own incompetence.
The issue seems to be more about the male instinct to protect women than anything else. Perhaps not by every male but the males in charge.
I agree and I am female.
Great to see an educated woman here and there
There is an element in society that is not interested in excellence. Only “fairness”.
By far an underrated comment.
This is actually a great interview. The SEAL explains everything without being condescending or rude while substantiating the whole argument with facts and being logical throughout, and the the interviewer actually listens without interrupting him every 5 seconds.
@Sam No , you're
@Sam no one said women in military is bad. Just admitting there are things men can do and women can not and vice versa. Also like his point on a full women spec ops unit similar to Israel. I can see such a unit having success depending on missions ie overwatch, snipers, scouts, Intel collecting, etc. Just dont be afraid to recognize weakness and optimize strengths.
Logic is patriarchy!
I’m an athletic girl, but I wouldn’t attempt this. Definitely changes the dynamic and in a life or death situation I’d honestly rather have a guy show up than a girl. I don’t want someone who had to do less testing to qualify
You know what l airborne infantry in the army then a cop l partnered with a female officer for a number of years she was bright smart brave but was 5’3” and 130 lb was athletic in high school now a mother of two and never lifted a weight in her live. I liked working with her but when l was face with a 6’4 260lb drugged dude do think l wanted her or another guy? Well that happened and l was just plain lucky but do you want combat soldiers to rely on luck because most females to keep up would need hour and a half in the gym each day
You're an intelligent girl. Women have totally lost it nowadays however.
@@toratora9009 Not all women, but a lot of them. Many women are tired of the woke trash as well.
@@loganw1232 most of the women I know are pretty normal really, they don't care about politics or political correctness or any of that other bs, they're just normal people living normal lives
it's the loud, annoying extremists that try to speak for the silent majority among them
@@toratora9009 thank you. In the military ego will get you killed. War is not a damn game.
If you lower military standards under any circumstances you're doing something wrong.
Even the Spartans thousands of years ago knew this.
Bro some soilders shouldn't be fuckin soilder based off that
SLONGEST KONGEST You obviously were and should never be, based on that....
@@SlongestKongest Based of what nigga
Yesssss
@Mark EMark a very sad joke.
NB my friend's sister was the UK's first female fighter pilot. She passed all the tests the men did, and aced them. Ain't nothing wrong with dat. Women can be fast reacting and intelligent. I'd say a top girl is extremely quick witted, but when it comes to physical endurance and strength... it isn't fair to compare. The males are the soldiers. The amazons of legend used a bow.
Navy seals: we have a woman in our unit take it easy on us
Enemy: ok
All the Taliban be switchin' their AKs to semi
Lmaoo
lol
😂
She'll talk about Taliban using patriarchal privilege next.
I served with US Army Special Operations / Special Forces and you can call me a hater or whatever. But I don't think woman belong in Special Operations Forces, period. Yes not all woman are the same in more ways than physically. And yes i believe there are a select few who would do just fine in Special Operations in every way without lowering training and unit standards. But that BY FAR, isn't the majority of woman. But not lowering the standards for woman isn't realistic unfortunately. What happens is standards will be lowered in whatever areas in order to push more woman through in the name of political correctness and so the military can prove they're "equal". This as already been shown with the somewhat recent woman who have passed Ranger school. Numerous candidates in those classes including a few instructors (anonymously) have come out and said yes things were changed or and tweeked even in the slightest bit for these females to give them a better chance/higher % chance to make it. Even if in very small ways (doesn't have to be huge leaps). Lowering standards only has to start with one unnoticeably small small change/step. It will only grow from there until the standards for men and woman are night and day clear.
This is all just my garbage opinion of course.
US Navy here, the special programs I went through personally I seen standards lowered for men too. Politics are politics and they'll always be there, but once the PR slows down on things like that I think you could expect the pipeline to hold strong, the seals are real good at that. By far this isn't the majority of women that will make it through i agree, but it's by far the majority of men too, that's the whole point of the pipeline process. don't you think if a pipeline designed to weed out people that cant do the job is effective, then gender shouldn't matter as long as they can perform? the physical prowess argument, in my opinion, is bullshit because thats the whole point of buds. The only problems i can see arising are sexual assault/harassment and the men having an ego complex about working with women which is an issue with the mindset that men are indoctrinated into. If they treated them as just another team member and they can do the job, what other reason could there be?
only a select few men are capable of being in the special forces too
@@whitneyw.7919 Very true. And even fewer woman. And if the Army kept the standards across the board for men and women alike. The amount of woman that made it would be then deemed a failure by the Army. Like I said, political correctness. Feelings over standards.
I would rather actually pass then have the standards lowered to help me pass. The same crap happens in school & at work.
I don't want a woman carrying me out of a burning building.
Finally an interviewer that lets his guest talk. Great stuff everyone
That's because his guest wasn't trying to change the topic to suit his own message or further his own career.
@@JustMe-xz2bz thats because this reporter is not trying to form the opinion the media wants to show us
@@jouisimo5701 - That too!
What interviewers are you watching that doesn't let the guest speak?
His points about high level men’s and women’s leagues in competition is the best I’ve ever heard it put.
Female entry requirements should be the EXACT same as males.
Oh yeah. I agree. It'll happen, don't worry... a strong nation will do it - my imagiNATION
That's equality
Eh no they shouldn't. Womens body aren't built to go thru what the male body goes thru in training.
Tom Smith
Wtf? You guys can’t be this serious? Do you even know why that minimum requirement is there in the first place?
Tom Smith
That’s not the point of this entire discussion at all. The particular problem being disputed here is lowering the standards for the average women to join the military. Let me spell it out for you: _Lowering the standards_
He is ABSOLUTELY Correct.
Each to their own .. their strengths .. not necessarily physical.
It makes sense, it all boils down to effectiveness and purpose. Does it make sense to have women carry 100lbs of gear and patrol all week? Probably not.
Makes sense to have female snipers several hundred meters from the engagement? Probably a better fit.
I definitely agree that making apples equal to oranges is not the way to go.
Women make babies. That is how they serve their country. At least two kiddies.
Violent_Bebop a female sniper would have to carry that 100 lb gear (that you mentioned) into and out of a war zone daily. Are you aware of a rifleman’s gear? Have you even ever served bro?
@@joesmith389 - Where is it written in the laws of physics that a person must carry 100lbs everywhere to complete task? I get it, grunts be grunts. Snipers come in all forms weak or strong. The best sniper the viet cong had was a woman. She killed a lot of "rifleman" carrying their 100lbs of gear.
Violent_Bebop you reference a viet cong sniper. Is that a joke? Wtf??? 😆😆😆
The irony of this is that a lot of female athletes n sportswomen don’t want coed sports or events because they know they don’t stand a chance against men and would no longer be at the top of their game.
in MMA i can easily break multiple ribs with a single elbow or knee strike on a male... thats one of the reason i never seriously fight female opponents... i dont want to to cave in their entire rib cage... hell they cant even do anything to me in Grappling based martial arts due to a difference in body weight...
Happy John you want a gold medal bro? Hype af
As an example: the men's QUALIFYING time for the olympic 100m is less than the WORLD RECORD for women. Have fun watching that kind of "competition".
Yea. Serena Williams says it all the time when she's asked. Do you think you could play guys, and she says hell no. Its a whole different beast. And we know she stays at the top of her game.
Yeah there are some transgenders in females sports and they win so much women had to try and kick them out
I spent 9 years in the US Army, 7 in the Infantry and 2 years with a Long Range Surveillance Detachment. The training I went through in the 1980's & early 90's no female could have met the physical standards & completed rigorous training.
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted.
According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle.
According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
@@Anonymous18817
Honestly, that MOS isn't suitable for a woman. Here's why I say that. Not only is the training rugged, but the ability to carry a male team mate for miles over difficult terrain is nearly impossible for a female. Also, ammo is not unlimited like in movies, you only carry 240 to 300 rounds of ammo. Which is quite heavy. If you're pinned down and low on ammo, you might have to fight hand to hand. You're exhausted, sleep deprived, hungry, and you have to physically fight a man in close quarters combat. It ain't like in the movies where the Black Widow jumps on a man's neck, swings him to the ground. Punches him and knocks him out. That's Hollywood and it's a lie. You are not going to be fighting in an ideal situation where you're well rested, fed, and the guy is the same size or smaller than you. Being combat arms sucks, long nights, humping a heavy ruck, being hungry and sleeping in the rain. It's not glamorous, it's pain. If you cannot carry a male team member 2 or 3 clicks over rugged terrain to get to an LZ in 3 hours when you're tired and hungry and injured yourself, then you are believing what Hollywood fed you. I'm just being honest. Good luck.
@@Anonymous18817Hate to break your drive but no woman on this planet has passed BUD/S, like you said most women who have tried it have had very serious injuries. There's a woman who promotes other women not even attempting it because she has irreversible health issues from even trying, one of those becoming sterile and no longer being able to have children. Men and women are different physically, to our bone mass and muscle tissue, it's just not something you can hope for equality with.
@@YoJaYmaNz Who’s the woman? I don’t care about fertility, I’ll never have kids anyway. Women have the biological advantage in endurance, muscular stamina and enduring the cold.
there s no women who passed bud s do you know what that means? you can t eather! if they have biological adavantages why men always on top and there are no women in averything? just lool long distance runners its about endurace but winner will be always a man @@Anonymous18817
The truth is, women wouldn’t even be able to pass 1/4 of the training. Even 1/3 of men can’t pass the training.
lmao more like 4/5ths of men cant ever get through it
@@rg8445 Marines and seals are entirely different tiers of training
@@rg8445 the ban for women has been lifted for several years now and the Marine basic has been watered down drastically since 2017 (opting pullups for pushups... Gimme a break)
The other issue lies in the fact that females can be impregnated as casualty of war, and then it's not just a liability, but it becomes basically a heinous act of self sacrifice that wasn't needed in the first place.
@Copypastable and it would defeat the purpose of the Navy SEALS: being an elite force.
Copypastabl Have to be a hell of a lot of watering for a female to make it thru BUD/S.... the irony - its prob just a matter of time, which is BS!
Bill Burr " they don't want their own stuff, they want our stuff"
Except they don't when it comes to really hard work, trash collecting, sewer work, on and on.
They want the benefits without the risk.
@@leeuniverse Fuck you bigot, i hate smart realistic people like you ok
@Genesis Obadiah this statement can't be argued against. Unless your a blue pill simp
I just laughed out loud. My god this hits home.
Because Demi Moore didn't play a MMA fighter
If you can do the damn job, you get the damn job, but never lower standards or testing to accomodate
Not worth the downside risk. Did you even listen?
@@thedalillama Did you listen?
doesnt matter what sex someone is, if a person is the best for the job they are the best for the job.
@@Cronuz2
Yes, I listened... to the *professional* that said the presence of women changes the dynamic of our fighting force.
You virtue signaling incels just need to give it up. It's not the way you are going to get a woman to sleep with you.
Straight onto the path of personal attacks.
Why would you even think you could guess at my personal life? and that benefit too you?.. don't answer, it was rethorical.
That dynamic could change to the better.
I servered with several women who did excellent.
And i truly believe that we should let those who are best suited for a task do it, and not base it upon the gender.
Just a heads up for the future;
you somewhat screamed "i have a low iq and i go for personal attacks because i dont know how to behave."
Me, or anyone else passing on knowledge in your direction is absolutely wasted.
@@SharkyShark94 I disagree with that part =)
I was a freshman rower in a light weight (70kg per person) men’s eight, (trained 7 times a week) and at the end of the year we were and still are (20 years later) faster than the Dutch national record for professional women 8+. And only 2 seconds behind the world record by Romania for womens 8+. These were women who were heavier, had more muscle’s and trained full time for years and years with better technical skills. And they had better equipment. Though I had a good team, that wasn’t the reason why we were faster. It seemed like our muscles could produce more power and had more stamina without being overdeveloped or trained on top level.
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted.
According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle.
According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
@@Anonymous18817 Troll
Men's muscles have more fast twitch muscle fibers which is for faster more explosive powerful movements
The nerve of this guy. Somebody call in a celebrity so they can give us the truth on this subject....
Lmao yeah. This guy has the NERVE to make a whole lotta sense. I'm calling my gender studies professor right now
@@newchangeunlisted_viewer5594 😂
Get a load of this guy using his brain how dare he
@DimeBag Big Brain Big Brain yeah that hhhhiiiimmm
Hahahahaha
Just feels so nice to hear someone speaking in reality.
Where is the same determination to make women sign up for the draft mandatory? These women see rights like a buffet table. Picking and choosing what they want.
You, you common sense spewing genius, finally I have found a comment like this. Life is complete
No one gets drafted anymore anyway.
@@effygoodwin37 All 18 year old males still have to sign up for selective service. Which is the draft. Do you think that if a massive war broke out there wouldn't be a draft again? Just because we haven't used it in a long time doesn't mean it cant be used again.
@@TheBothvar Nope, the US won't use the draft again. The Vietnam War and the political shitstorm the draft caused throughout the 1960s and early 70s put an end to it. Selective Service will probably be abolished at some point.
What the military does now when there is a big war on is change enlistment standards and offer more bonuses and other incentives for people to join - and they can just 'recycle' their manpower and extend their active service (known as stop-lossing). That's why in Iraq and Afghanistan, you had Army soldiers doing 15 month tours and you have many guys with 3 or more deployments in their 1st enlistment.
That's basically the model the military uses for conventional wars now. Politicians and military leaders learned after Vietnam that the public don't give as much of a shit when it's all-volunteer servicemen dying in wars. They might virtue signal with TYFYS platitudes, but at the end of the day, people know what they're signing up for.
If you mean literal WW3... yeah, that will go nuclear within a few weeks, so no draft needed, as everyone will be fucked anyway.
Effy Goodwin I agree with most of that however the US death toll in Iraq was not even close to Vietnam. When the chips are all the way down. I’m willing to bet they will use it as a last resort.
I like his ability to deliver information quickly and clearly. Speaking fast, but easily understood. I don’t have to play the video at 1.5x for once.
I don't think I have watched a YT video at less than 1.75x in over a year. Watching other platforms at the std 1x is almost painful for me to watch now, lol!
Luckily he's no Ben Shapiro. 😂😂😂
He’s an operator lol being quick and precise is part of the job
All I can say is if they can pass the test without handicap. all power to them. If they have to dilute the testing to get people to pass it defeats the purpose
Unfortunately, its not that simple since women in a male group also changes the group dynamic and may drag the group down even if she is fit for service... Just the human mindset
@Frenchie McDonald What if they were all females? So males and females are still seperated.
@@ganondorkdagreat9234 There isn't a single female that has passed even the pre screening process. Having enough people to form a whole unit would be pretty unlikely to put it mildly.
@@ganondorkdagreat9234 That was the exact recommendation made. Even a capable women would likely make the unit less effective. If women want to be in special forces so badly then they need their own unit that does a different assortment of things and has different screening parameters (so you would actually have enough to build the unit). There is no world where women will work well together with men in war. Doesn't matter if she's butch, ugly, married, anything, men do not act the same way when there is a female present. Just think about the dynamic when you're hanging with the boys, or when there is any female present. It's completely different.
That's horse shit
I can't believe we are even having this debate. Political correctness is destroying this country.
It’s destroying all countries
@@Mr1987Joe I think there is a large push back coming and it has already started.
I'm pretty sure Covid is doing that friend
In many accounts in history, it's often a symptom of a dying culture when women are pushed into masculine roles and loose sexual standards. There are only 2 types of societies/groups that allow women in combat.... Desperate populations that NEED ANYONE who can wield a weapon (like cities under siege or Russia in WWII), and barbaric societies. There are no other exceptions.
@@SirMattomaton Yes well the weak to very weak US military is pretty desperate by now, lol!
Great interview, totally agree with the seal! Thank you for your service!
I mean the answer is easy to me: whoever can complete the training without any help or special treatment can do it. Dont change the rules to make it easier for women, but also dont hold them back if they can do it.
You're missing the point, women in the same highly trained and specialized units as men creates problems. And as the gentleman said, "Does this make us a more effective warfighting force? No." The women should have their own SOF unit in each branch or just under JSOC. You can't have males and females in units like these, expecting them to train up, deploy and operate in these incredibly dangerous and stressful missions without creating problems that will undermine their efficiency as a team. That only works in Hollywood. Let them have their own legacy, their own unit, their own name.
spyderTL and for gay men or women? Would you have to then weed out and seperate them as well? What about racists who supposedly cannot function in a professional environment with someone of a different race? Do you see how this whole separate but equal argument is such a slippery slope into ludicrousness?
PewDiePie Subscriber #3457238 the problem with what your saying is that in the military especially the marines things like harassment which is what your implying would happen is taken extremely seriously and is grounds for potential termination the things is if something like this were to happen it’s more than likely to be shut down immediately so no you need not separate them because there is no open homophobia or racism that could negatively affect the team
Sesshomaru Uzumaki as a woman, I don’t want to work with the best of the men b to the best of the women. Alpha females and males don’t work well in battle environments, period
@@zookboy5714 Fun fact... nobody cares what sexuality or race you are. I mean bringing up sexuality doesnt even make any sense. If you're in Special operations you probably act pretty masculine so nobody can tell
If a woman can pass the test then all power to her, but we shouldn’t lower standards to be woke. I’d love to see a lady become a seal, but not by lowering the standards
Still even if she passes mixed combat units might not be for the best as the guy said an all women’s unit is beneficial
Yes this. Same standards for everything if you make it you make it, if you don’t you don’t. Gender doesn’t play a role. Lowering the standards for some lowers the capabilities of the whole.
@@빈유-r5l exactly they don’t belong
@@빈유-r5l 😅😅🤣... Exactly...
I don't think we will see any female seals for a long time
@@jaydenharris731 th-cam.com/video/PnJS7LR4GE0/w-d-xo.html
WOW.
M speechless
After years.
Yeah, when it comes to national security, I'd rather be a realist than "woke".
When it comes to basically anything
Woke is a realist💯
Don't confuse a dreamer pretending to be a woke person.
the problem is as country you can be woke or realistic
you can not say be woke here but not there
thats not how things work
since when you have woke people that vote what you think they will vote for?
Never be woke
What about weak men?
"Does this make us a more affective war fighting force? In my opinion, no it doesn't" HE'S ABSOLUTELY right. The calmness by which he spoke says a lot about how deadly he can be. Nothing but respect for the Navy SEALS ✊🏾
I’m a woman in her 20s and I’m training to become a U.S. Navy SEAL. How should a woman prepare for BUD/S? How are women treated in BUD/S? Do you have any advice for preparation? I’m a civilian and I want to go enlisted.
According to what some BUD/S dropouts told me, one female SEAL candidate broke her legs in Basic Orientation (BO) which is the first two weeks of BUD/S, another female SEAL candidate broke her legs in BUD/S Prep and a third female SEAL candidate got rolled back in BO for stress fractures. None of them made it. Evan Eichler told me that one of the women he trained was medically dropped from BUD/S because she broke her ankle.
According to the SEALSWCC Scout Team, most female SEAL candidates struggle with load bearing and just don’t have enough durability. Women have weaker bones and tendons than men, studies have shown that women develop stress fractures 3x more often than men. Do you have any advice for becoming more durable?
"You don't have to understand women. Women understand women and they hate each other."
- Al Bundy -
Ol' Al said some Confucius shit in his day! LOL
@@magnusrutger8863 Yeah, stuff like: "If your watch falls into your toilet, you're gonna have a shitty time."
@@yourmomma8065 Hatred can be good fuel if the aim is war. Put them on the battlefield and let them fall or fly as men do.
Lmao
@@yourmomma8065 that old stripper told him she danced for the troops, he's like "union or Confederate?" 🤣🤣🤣
Great comparison.
Denying the huge differences between genders are delusional and outright dangerous.
Hell, they're teaching it in some college's NOW..
@A Z lol
A Z ROFL!!!
Very true! I see you in the comments across all types of videos, everywhere I go :D
If a women can pass all the physical test. I don't see why they can't do it.
As a woman, the idea of a special forces female soldier is ludicrous. Just sayin...
@Yuri Soyboyka Why can't they handle it emotionally?
@The Next Chapter I'm a guy, and I agree
YOU UNCLE TOM !!!
Females make better special agents and can get more information out of men than another man ever could.
@Nyree Harris Women know their role. Men know their role. Unless you are beastly women with more testosterone than the average woman, then go back to the kitchen girlfriend. You know exactly where you belong, your feelings are just hurt, be honest.
The seriousness of the conversation is undercut by the marvel statues.
they want into special forces, but not the draft.
Bring back the draft,let’s see if they want to be drafted
Right. But they're all for equality 🙄
You’re argument is invalid just like males only service members who are already in the service and prove themselves can be put into special forces “ if they want “ it’s a decision ( not mandatory). A draft would be taking anyone and everyone who is qualified and at random. There are women in the military with more balls than you and can achieve more
I'm going to be honest, I don't understand what you are trying to say
@@josetarango4030 So, women shouldn't be held to the same standards that men are held to simply because they're in the military under voluntary reasons right now just like men are? Nice strawman you built there.
This makes more sense than any take I’ve ever seen on the subject. Just good ol solid common sense.
They had to drop the standards for woman in the infantry enough said
you're problem is with the quotas and the standards drops. the end
@@andrabook8758 military standards and quotas should never be dropped.... that's accepting a weakening of military standards. The human race as a whole should only be increasing it's standards such as being faster, stronger, smarter, etc., .
Opening the military for women is not an issue in my book, when they can deal with the same standard.
But lowering the standard for diversity is dangerous crap.
your? you're?
@@jwaxmcgeeg9706 yeet
Smart guy with an important message.
Most women are not built to be able to carry a 240 pound man 4 miles back to safety. This is a mans game.
It’s not even about the strength. It’s about everything else. It changes the dynamic
@Mike Stone 💯 I was going to say the same exact thing bro.
@@JJ-si4qh So does an outsider coming into the group.
Eamon Shields you’ll never carry a injured man 4 miles to safety they’ll be dead by then that’s just stupid.
Mike Smith some can. Some women are naturally built like refrigerators and are strong as all fuck
Let the actual navy seals vote for themselves.
I agree
I'm not really sure if I agree with that because what if they have biases that are unsupported and ate not in the best interest in creating a more effective fighting force
Nah the only people that matter in deciding the fate of the military are dumbass college idiots and people who have never held a gun
@@Aaron-wq3jz Damn right they'll have a bias and they're in the right too. They're the ones fighting and dying. If anyone knows what it takes to do their job well its them. I wouldn't come to your work without any experience at it and try to dictate to you what will make you more effective.
@@chrismaldonado2989 that's great that they have the most experience but we've seen that throughout history that that type of self government can be detrimental. I dont care what you've done no one should have the right to be biased based on feelings and prejudice
The fact this is a idea 💡...tells you how practical this would be
WAAAYYYYY too much common sense being spoken in an 8 min video. Snowflakes won't be able to handle this one.
The paine! THE PAINE!
Buddy, I'm a snowflake and agree with everything he said. Good day to you.
If by 'snowflake' you mean zoomer, then I'm a snowflake that agrees with everything this man said, but yeah most of my generation are a bunch of betas.
@@freeross371 In my experience the majority of 'snowflakes' tend to be millenials. Of course there are a lot of dipshits in our generation too.
This dude is absolutely right
The Australian women's national soccer team, The Matildas, got beaten by a team of 15 year old schoolboys.
😳 👁👄👁 😂😌👌☝️
Yeah same thing happened to US soccer team
ok
@@Kenny-bj2zq both the US and Australian team, damn.
Yep, Olympic level women tend to be almost on par with a good high school boy's team...almost.
Any good HS boy's team, for example, would destroy any WNBA team, or the women's Olympic team. Easily. They wouldn't beat any state champ boy's teams, wouldn't even make it far in the playoffs of most states.
There are loads of stories about pickup guy's teams scrimmaging against national champ women's teams in college and easily beating them. We're talking guys where most of them didn't even play HS ball. I
A good HS boy tennis player would destroy, easily, Serena Williams.
The world record women's 100 meters is roughly a .5 seconds slower than the HS boy's record.
Look at driving distance in golf.
The women's high jump record is 6.8 feet. HS boy's is 7.5 feet.
You can go on and on.
None of these sports are life and death.
MMA is close, and nobody wants to see a woman take on a man in that.
But make it combat, life and death, and people are all for putting women with special forces who are the best of the best? Ridiculous.
"Don't confuse enthusiasm with capability"
retired General Peter Schomaker
Who?
Very true. Men are physically stronger. Sorry ladies it's TRUE.
@@aliceshaw8265
Probably more so in business. But in something like sports that may not be the case. Not everybody’s going to be a Usain Bolt or LeBron James or a Schwarzenegger no matter how hard they try.
@@aliceshaw8265 They tried implementing females in the Ranger school with no special treatments. When the women were failing miserably , a general who is known to push for leftist ideas lowered the standards so low that it caused outrage in the ranks, but two females were able to pass, but not by Rangers standards. The saddest part is they gloat that they passed Ranger school when it was actually given to them for political purposes.
Wish I could ask a question as an interviewer. He said the purpose of the seals is to be most lethal, successful, and effective team. If there were an instance where a woman in the navy were the 1st in (perhaps) medic skills or sniper, wouldn’t you want her on the team?
Gender aside, I want whoever is most accurate for their specific job. If your job is to be the biggest/strongest person on the team, idc if you’re a guy or girl- size matters 😂
The way I see it, if you can't throw a 175 to 200 pound man on your shoulder and carry him out of the danger zone, then you shouldn't be on the battlefield.
Exactly and probably heavier than that too, if you account for the weight of his pack
That’s all well and good and nice. But we’re talking about war.
If you cant throw a 175+ human to THE GROUND, and be very damn sure that you can KILL, possibly with your bare hands.... then you definitely shouldn’t be FIGHTING on the battlefield. Medics, support, transport, etc. Those roles, maybe if they can sling someone over a shoulder, pass the physical, give em a job ON the battlefield.
*Combat* is a different fucking story. I don’t want women ( OR ANYONE ) from my country to be deployed somewhere, that we won’t be reasonably assured that THAT soldier, whomever the fuck they are, has a literal fighting chance. We cannot continue to disservice our countrymen and women in the armed forces ( more than we tragically already do ) by sending them to combat they just cannot win, based on sex or gender or whatever the fuck it is.
plus 40-60 pounds of gear
@@nobodiesthetiger785 40-60 pounds of gear EACH. And that's BEFORE the rucksack. EVERY SINGLE TIME I was ever in training with women they did NOT give the same performance as the males. End of story. 82nd Airborne. VERY damn few females, and the ones we DID have were kept out of the way in the aid station.
Surely that would be on the lighter side to, I could be wrong though hahaha
I can only imagine how many butt hurt folks watching this are crying themselves out of overstocked toilet paper.
The only people that would potentially be saddened by this is women who want to be navy seals... and chances are they're mentally strong enough to not let this get to them.
You wipe your eyes with doodoo paper?
@@muhammadwaliflowers Not after it has doodoo on it. But when it's new it's just tissue paper. I use it to wipe my libtard tears all the time
Mixing females into combat units inherently changes the dynamic of that unit. Men, from an evolutionary psychology standpoint, have an innate sense to preserve female life and will sacrifice everything to ensure that. Mission success can not afford to be derailed by biological imperatives
lmao
The comparison with the MMA really blew my mind.
It is actually insane.
They are not willing to have men and women fight in sports
but when it comes down to the ACTUAL BATTLEFIELD, LIFE & DEATH SITUATION
they are like noooooooooo, get them together.
The stupidity of it is in truth palpable.
Exactly
This is definitely the best argument for keeping woman from these jobs but its still flawed. Combat is not MMA. It's a lot of walking, vehicle and weapons maintenance, navigation, communication, leadership, and much more. I would venture to guess that 99.9999% of people who have ever served in the military have not entered hand-to-hand combat with the enemy. So unlike the very specific subset of athletics that is MMA, where two opponents are competing to win a hand-to-hand fight, the small nuances matter less. Its the same reason MMA uses weight classes and strict weigh-ins before fights. Every little detail is exponentially impactful on the outcome of the competition. Combat arms jobs, however, are a much more complex set of tasks with an unlimited amount of factors differentiating one soldier's strengths from another's.
They actually had a semi-skilled man (Fallon Fox) fight in the women's division of Bellator. He was winning by completely overpowering women that had better skills than him.
Sorry, I forgot when you SHOT PEOPLE in FAKE WRESTLING COMPETITIONS
@@AmyRoulette They also don't have to carry their injured team mates out of the ring in fake wrestling.
I'm all for women in any role in the military. What I am against is lowering entrance criteria. There are certain branches of the military that the strongest and fittest men have a hard time passing the entrance test and an ever harder time getting through training. The requirements to enter those elite units are the same for everyone and need to remain at a very high standard to maintain the integrity of these units.
It's the same with basketball. The NBA doesn't say women can't play in the NBA there just haven't been any women good enough to make the cut to this point.
Perfect argumentation!!
That guy had a great idea. An all female special ops unit. Instead of SEALS, they would be "Mermaids".
Women are in various special operation forces. Either sex can land a little bird onto a road in the middle of Iraq during a fire fight as part of SOAR.
I’m ok with women being in the army or service. Just one question, who’s going to carry the tampons?
@@dazza5286 pretty sure most take a form of birth control that stops periods. That and if the body is put under enough stress theyll quit having them anyways.
Ha ha ha ha. No, "The Little Mermaids". Kind of like "Space Command". "To infinity and beyond." Jesus, help us, or Buddah, Mohammed, Krishna, whom ever.
@@therealamericanjohnsmith2343 I confess, "The Little Mermaids" does have more of a ring to it. : - )
Look, a rare event! Someone speaking common sense.
That made me chuckle haha, A rare event 😂
Most men arent fit enough for the Seals. Its just that demanding of a role. They are the best of the best. And this, in no way should be compromised.
Most men? Try 95% of men or higher could never get through Seal Training. It requires the fitness of an elite college swimmer or wrestler.
@@David35687 Yea, i was thinking pretty much along those lines, when I said "most men".
The difference is even though most men aren't fit enough they are ALLOWED to TRY. Most women aren't fit enough so people are saying they should be legally barred from trying. Half of the comments talking about "differences in men vs women" are completely missing the point. MOST PEOPLE CANNOT AND WILL NOT MEET SPECIAL OPERATIONS STANDARDS. What is between their legs is not a reason to create laws saying who can and can't tryout.
@@denniswilliams2190 No, what we see again and again is as soon as you open up a combat position to women, the women fail and start complaining that the standards are too tough and that they need a different lower set of standards.
@@David35687 lol I was with you until you started making up your own facts. Please cite where "again and again" we saw widespread issues of "women starting to complain about the standards being too tough so they were lowered". Were standards lowered for pilots when females were allowed? Were standards lowered at Ranger school for female candidates? What about Airborne school? And please not your own version; cite a news article or something damn. I'll grant that it was wrong back in the day to make female vs male PT standards but I doubt it was because women complained; it was likely because females could only serve in support roles anyways and the military would love to fill its support roles with able bodied people even if they aren't in top shape.
Agreed makes total sense
They should have women-only units. No need to compare outcomes. The results will be obvious.
Agree, this is the only way I can see it work.
Ever see the bear grylls island season 2 first 3 episodes. Says it all.
@@ShifuCareaga what happened there
@@scottvelez3154 you have to see it to believe it. So funny and revealing omg.
@@scottvelez3154 it is on youtube
"whats your concern since it hasn't happened yet?"
maybe we should be asking WHY it hasn't happened. There are no women in the SEALS because there are no women who have met the requirements and succeeded in the training. Shoehorning women in, lowering the standard, simply because you can, is going to cause problems just the same as lowering the standard for men who would otherwise fail.
Yes it would be retarded to send a under performing person to do a serious job that you risk your life in or worse the lives of others.
Straight common sense
@@realhebplus1871 should fun trying to explain to the family of a dead marine why rescue wasnt possible.
@@Teixas666 yes would be horrible but it would probably be looked at as a sexist statement towards "WoMeN" and then they would riot and want a law to pass that all female military be served testosterone to have a chance at beating their male counterparts then people would make fun of them and I would then laugh like this, ha
They tried implementing females in the Ranger school with no special treatments. When the women were failing miserably , a general who is known to push for leftist ideas lowered the standards so low that it caused outrage in the ranks, but two females were able to pass, but not by Rangers standards. The saddest part is they gloat that they passed Ranger school when it was actually given to them for political purposes.