@@SAINTxSZN The NFL seems overly protective of that term. If you watch local network news, they can’t have anything that says “Super Bowl” unless theirs is airing the game. Our local ABC staying uses “The Big Game”.
The most interesting *forgotten" championship was the 1969 Minnesota Vikings who won the NFL title that year but lost to the AFL champs the Chiefs in SB IV. The last season before the merger
@@BradyBaseball13 nah he literally only spoke facts. Saints had multiple #32 ranked defenses during Brees’s career. It’s sad to see how badly they wasted him.
@@603xxg I wasn’t going to comment anything but then I decided I might as well. The Saints had only 1 team in Brees’ career that was ranked #32 in defense. There is no multiple years, it was just one. And thats a fact. I can paste the link to rankings if you would like.
@@BradyBaseball13 my bad homie. Maybe they were 31 or 30 the other years. As of arbitrary rankings when compared to other units actually mean anything related to on field performance. They were still just as trash even if there were other teams that were even worse somehow.
@Trippe Gamez That doesn't mean Stafford is going to be some savior in LA. People are setting the bar way higher than it should be. Wait a little bit. See how he adapts to the offense, see how the team plays. Stafford has had good players in his past like Calvin Johnson, Golden Tate, Marvin Jones, etc. Way too premature.
@@kingspoodler6144 Based on what? He's had good talent and he's been mediocre at best. Thinking Stafford alone makes the Rams SB contenders is like me saying Carson Wentz makes the Colts instant SB contenders.
@@micah2426 as a packers fan I disagree. Also a lot of teams that haven't won a superbowl have won an NFL or AFL championship like the Lions and Browns. Also the NFL has had more than 8 teams most of its existence
You know I see a lot of people surprised with the Ravens at #3, without realizing that if there overall winning included the Pre-96 Browns, they'd be #1 on this list. In fact, there overall win record would be above .600 with the Pre-96 Browns. Oh and the Browns would drop to #32 without the Pre-96 Browns.
@@rileyfreeman7122the browns moved their franchise to Baltimore and became the ravens, a few seasons later Cleveland started a new franchise and just used the same name
Okay the browns and lions all have titles, no super bowls but there were championship b4 1967, if you are counting wins and loses b4 67 you gotta count the nfl and afl championships as well
@@brandonjohnson5503 wtf you mean idk the history? They counted the cowboys win back to 1960, and yes other teams also won championships just ppl act like the browns and lions have never been anything ever when the browns b4 the merger were a very dominant force with Otto Graham and Jim brown
I agree. If only Super Bowl victories are counted, then only Super Bowl era wins and losses should be counted. (and it should be noted that only 1966-present records are counted) If 1920-1965 wins and losses are included, then their respective titles should also be included.
August 22, 2007 - The Texas Rangers, after spotting the Baltimore Orioles 3 runs in the first 3 innings, scored *30* runs during the rest of the game, winning 30-3. Not the biggest all-time, but the most recent extreme blowout in MLB. Video of that game's highlights is(still?) here on YT. From Wikipedia: "On August 22, the Rangers scored an all-time American League record of 30 runs in one game against the Orioles. The final was 30-3. Texas' 30 runs broke the AL record and modern major-league record set by the 1950 Red Sox and tied by the 1955 White Sox, and were the most scored by any team since the Chicago Colts hung 36 runs on Louisville in a game in 1897"
@@Kingkam_77 But he is counting every regular season win a team has had since its founding so it make no sense to not include the championships before the Superbowl era.
@Ben Fetchak um him basketball video counted all the valueless Celtics titles that was just a big man bullying a bunch of short guys for 11 of 13 years of those count so do the others
@@staringatthesun861 well its not as important but it is still very important bc when you don't count those titles you're making it look like, her they played games and crowned no champion, hey wait did someone in their 20s make this? Lmao
Thing is with The Pack they won I believe 3 of there championships when the way this was done was there was no playoffs the championship went to the team with the best record.
This discredits the great NFL teams that won NFL Championships. Teams like Detroit Lions and Chicago Bears for example. Your list acts as if those great players and bonafide championship never existed. Lions won 4 titles 1835, 1952, 1953 and 1957 and you list them with NONE….. just as an example The Bears won 7 NFL championships and you list only one. You have to revise this list so young fans understand that these teams won legitimate NFL Championships before the Super Bowl arrangement
Should definitely include NFL and AFL championships. Of course the Lions won in 1935, not 1835. The 3rd team to win after the Bears and Giants. And in 1935, the Tigers won their first World Series.
If you consider the Baltimore Ravens the Pre-96 Browns, then they'd actually have the best overall winning record (Haven't checked in a while but last time I checked it was at around .610, and pretty sure they haven't dipped under .600 yet.).
Obviously this must be based during the Super Bowl Era considering that the Green Bay Packers have won the most Championships in NFL History with 13, Six with Curly Lambeau and Five more with Vince Lombardi. And also you have the Cleveland Browns with a ton of Championships as well thanks to A Legendary Quarterback named Otto Graham. By the way, believe it or not, the Detroit Lions did win a Championship. Even though it was back in the 50’s, it still counts.
@@Jiltedin2007 1932, 1952, 1953, 1957 32’ they had the best record in the league, and by virtue that was what got them the title. 1952, 53, & 57 all saw a similar outcome; a win over the Browns in the championship game
@@Steve_Hunts96 Thank you. 1952 and 1953 was during The Otto Graham Era of Cleveland when the Lions beat the Browns. The other time Graham lost the NFL Championship was in 1951 to the Los Angeles Rams, the team the Browns beat the year before at Cleveland when their Kicker kicked The Winning Field Goal that very much sailed into Lake Erie. For 10 straight years Otto Graham brought the Cleveland Browns into the NFL Championship, winning 7 of those times.
@@Steve_Hunts96 Actually in 1932 they tied with the Bears for that title so a playoff game was held to determine the champion and the Bears won that game.
The NY Giants won a total of 8 not 4 NFL Championships 1927, 1934, 1938 and 1956 in addition to the four Super Bowl championships of 1987, 1991, 2008 and 2012
They had the misfortune of playing against NFC East teams in the Super Bowl. Unlike today, the NFC east was the best division in football at that time.
The wins are over the life of the team, like with Green Bay and Chicago, but titles are only Super Bowls, because Arizona won a couple NFL titles, and Green Bay and Chicago won a lot more, and Buffalo won two AFL titles.
The Bears have won NINE titles , more than any team other than Green Bay. They have won more games than any team other than Green Bay. This video is bogus. There is no rational reason to only count NFL championship games that have been called "Super Bowls!"
The reason why was because the Raiders held a Winning Percentage of over .700 from 1963(When Al Davis turned the Raiders around) till I don’t know when considering that the Raiders started going into the shitter in the 90’s. COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE!
They were the winningst team in sports in AL Davis youth. It's simple. Big Al got old and started to slip. They lost more as he aged. Then he died. They Have hit rock bottom.
@@bigalsnow8199 John Gruden now has the Raiders turning the corner slowly but surely. Gone will be the days as the Raiders being a doormat to the NFL, plus the fact that the team is now in Las Vegas will be a plus considering that The City of Oakland did nothing for the Raiders and also breached all of their promises to Al Davis, Sr. after luring them back from Los Angeles. Gruden was the best thing to ever happen to the Raiders as he will make this team do an about face before the time he did come to Oakland before moving to Las Vegas.
@@Jiltedin2007 City of Oakland did nothing for the Raiders but the fans gave them back to back sellouts and support like no other...until the move to L.A. TELL IT LIKE IT IS! After the first move Raiders came back losers and never regained that fan support but Still had all the fan support a loser can expect. Vegas has money...and the Chinese Mafia...but football fans? No one really knows. As long as they win they should be fine but...that hasn't happened yet. Las Vegas won't support a loser...no one will.
Packers won 13. Bears won 9. You didn’t specify Super Bowls, and this is all time record. You should have given coaches Lambeau, Lombardi and Hallas their proper respect.
If it’s not a superbowl it doesn’t count! Lol people like to disregard the forty years of hard fought football before the merger-even though if it wasn’t for those teams like The Bears, Packers etc.-it’s hard to envision the NFL being what it is today.
:21 - The Arizona Cardinals won the NFL title in 1947, when they were in Chicago. They beat Philadelphia 28-21 in the championship game. :46 - The Detroit Lions won the NFL championship in 1952, 1953, and 1957.
And who can forget the Tonawanda Kardex, with their all-time winning percentage of… .000, as they lost the only NFL game they ever played (in 1921). Or should I say, who can remember them.
You should either give records during the SB era or give all-time championships. The former would probably be better, since you would to count AAFL and AFL championships as well as NFL.
If your not going to count championships you should start counting overall wins in the Superbowl era. Brows, lions, and redskins were great organizations in the pre Superbowl era.
@@nicholausbell2749 Green Bay aren't the original NFL franchise. They weren't even in the NFL's first season. The only two teams that been in the NFL the entirety of the NFL's existence are the Bears and Cardinals
Surprised me, and did not at the same time, to see the Lombardi and Landry legacies live on. To be sure, both franchises had great coaches and winning periods after their respective eras, but still noticeable in the history the work that these two men did with the New York Giants together in the 1950s, then with the Packers and Cowboys in the 1960s and beyond. I think the Bears and the Browns would be higher if the list includes the pre-Super Bowl NFL and the AAFC.
*The NFL existed for over 45 years prior to the Super Bowl era. Those championships count just as much. The correct Top 5 list is as follows:* *Green Bay Packers: 13 Championships* *Chicago Bears: 8 Championships* *New York Giants: 8 Championships* *Pittsburgh Steelers: 6 Championships* *New England Patriots: 6 Championships* *Everyone else: 5 or less.*
@@shacone3909 *What are you talking about? Fewer teams means far less roster spots, which means you had to be damn good to be on a team. That means far less mediocrity in the league.*
Untrue on Cardinals. They have 2 titles. The NFL was around a long time before the Super Bowl came around and those 2 NFL titles count as world championships.
They only counted super bowls as titles for.everyone, for example Detroit won the championship the first year they existed but it didn't count because of that.
well put tom brady on any team they'll win the SB LOL bucs will be dog shit in a year or two watch they'll be back to their 6-10 seasons for 20 more years to come
@@FordFalcon1962nBlue Shut up man we still have talented players in Tampa Bay so whether Tom Brady leave the Buccaneers will still be good no matter what happens.
@@bigpanda2000 Everyone HAS to care. That’s a dumb comment to make. Those NFL Championships were real and the ONLY NFL championships at the time. That’s the problem…. Your “ no one cares” comment which degrades all those great NFL teams and championships
This is over 2 years old. It said the Rams won only 1 title, but they have 2. They won Super Bowl 56. It said the Chief had won 2 titles. They now have 4. They won Super Bowl 57 and 58.
You need to redo this graphic. You need to change "Titles Won" to "Super Bowl Titles Won". You're not counting NFL and AFL titles won prior to 1967, and you should. The Cleveland Browns and Detroit Lions have won multiple championships prior to the Super Bowl era, and that counts for something.
@@hammer5857 13, but there was only 14 NFL teams and some of them don't exist anymore. The year Superbowl Superbowl 4 happened was when the AFL and NFL combined and there were a lot more teams, therefore better competition. Which means the Packers did that when the NFL was less competitive. Them the Lions, Bears, Browns, Rams, Redskins, Giants, Colts and Vikings were the only teams that were really good for about a span of the NFL's first 40 years. There are 14 playoff teams every year now. Also, let's say the NFL shortened to like 10 teams, then a few teams would be dominant and when a lot of Superbowls.
Prior to 1970 the Steelers had not won any type of divisional title or league title or any appearance in a post season game. The Steelers had probably the fewest wins and winning pct. Since 70 they have won 6 super bowls, and numerous AFC championships and division titles, definitely the Steelers have benefited most since the merger.
This includes the all time records but only Super Bowl titles. What about the titles from 1920 to 1965? I would have included all NFL and AFL titles or only the all time record during the Super Bowl era.
Vikings had too many offensive meltdowns in their 4 SB appearances. 6,7,7, and 14 points aren't going to win you many titles. I always felt bad for Bud Grant.
@@SandstormGD2025 "teams that always suck". Ummm....s'cuse me? Only the Lions fit that description (and the Buccs when they used to be in the Central). The Bears and Packers rank in the top 5 in winning percentage on this list...both are in their division. what are you talking about? The only time the Vikings reigned over the NFC North/Central undisputedly was in the 70s. 60s was fierce competition with Green Bay. 80s was fierce competition with Chicago. 90s was fierce competition with Green Bay. 2000s was fierce competition with Green Bay and Chicago. 2010s was fierce competition with Green Bay.
How high up the list are the Patriots if not for Tom Brady? He accounted for 219 wins and only 64 losses. AND the six Lombardi trophies are the same as the Steelers franchise.
It wasn't only in the last 2 decades the Patriots had good play, consistently dominant play yes, but not good play. If that your statement about them were true, they never would have had good play outside of two decades.
Would it be too much to ask for this video to be redone remembering the fact there were nearly 50 years of NFL titles before the Super Bowl? You did count the wins and losses for that period, why not the championships too?
Jjames James-Ah, get outta here, ya stinky cheesehead fan. One of these times my Bears will right the ship, and your "team" will be losing to us instead of the other way around.
@@aaronzarate7956 a loss for the cowboys would hurt more than one for the Packers. Just like in baseball, the more times you play, the less you average will change. A couple of Dallas losses could give Green Bay the solo lead. And that is very likely, as the Cowboys are trash right now. Go Pack Go!
how does whats going on in GB make dallas bunny hop GB at #1? lol look at the records totally differnet packers started like 40 years before dallas..Dallas started in 1960 if im not mistaken same as many new teams like the broncos , etc,.
Winningest pro team of the 70’s. Very good first half of 80s - mediocre back half of 80’s. Consistent 10 win/season team in 90s. 10 win/season team from 2000-2004 - then dropped- off the map for past 15 years. If this survey was conducted in 2004 - Dolphins would have been somewhere in top 3.
You can't give the total win-loss record and only count the Super Bowl era. You need to go all the way to when the Chicago Cardinals, Chicago Bears and Green Bay Packers started.
Tampa Bay: Worst winning %age and two titles.
First one: because the 1st year coach with another guy's players got the coach's old team
Second one: Tom Brady. Period.
@@fromthehaven94 kinda tax but I'm glad to be a bucs fan
So the other guy won with the other guys players. Tells me d 1st guy couldn't coach his own guys. Defeats the logic of your own argument. Sheeez.
@@gordonreed2736 John Gruden coached Oakland and then moved to Tampa Bay and they beat Oakland in the Super Bowl. Very crazy time back then.
@@gordonreed2736 How many playoff wins did the Bucs have between their Super Bowl victory and 2020?
Im assuming the titles are just in the Superbowl era? There were NFL championships before the NFL and AFL merged....
yes superbowl era
I’m sure they can’t say “Super Bowl” because of copyrights.
Yeah it doesn't make sense,,they count the regular season records of the pre-super bowl era but not the championships
@@dave929 copyrights are stupid sometimes how does putting the word superbowl in a video benefit a content creator in anyway financially?
@@SAINTxSZN The NFL seems overly protective of that term. If you watch local network news, they can’t have anything that says “Super Bowl” unless theirs is airing the game. Our local ABC staying uses “The Big Game”.
Why not count titles before the Super Bowl? You are counting wins and losses from before the Super Bowl.
You are exactly right!!!
And on the 7th day God created the superbowl! That is when the universe started....hahaha
Which means that the Browns should have 8 lol
Yea this is dumb. If you count all losses you should count all championships.
The most interesting *forgotten" championship was the 1969 Minnesota Vikings who won the NFL title that year but lost to the AFL champs the Chiefs in SB IV. The last season before the merger
As a kid I was a Rams fan,Vikings beat us every yr.50 yrs later would love to see them get 1.
Shows how terrible the Saints were before Brees.
I mean the Saints did have 5 losing seasons while Brees was their QB
@LandrificaLagician sounds like you are in a little denial. But hey you are welcome to your opinion. Have a good one.
@@BradyBaseball13 nah he literally only spoke facts. Saints had multiple #32 ranked defenses during Brees’s career. It’s sad to see how badly they wasted him.
@@603xxg I wasn’t going to comment anything but then I decided I might as well. The Saints had only 1 team in Brees’ career that was ranked #32 in defense. There is no multiple years, it was just one. And thats a fact. I can paste the link to rankings if you would like.
@@BradyBaseball13 my bad homie. Maybe they were 31 or 30 the other years. As of arbitrary rankings when compared to other units actually mean anything related to on field performance. They were still just as trash even if there were other teams that were even worse somehow.
Rams 12 games over .500. As long as they don't go 2-15 this year with Stafford, they stay in the positive winning % column. 👍
@Trippe Gamez I agree. The lions have the worst management in pro sports. Well, them and the Timberwolves.
@Trippe Gamez That doesn't mean Stafford is going to be some savior in LA. People are setting the bar way higher than it should be. Wait a little bit. See how he adapts to the offense, see how the team plays. Stafford has had good players in his past like Calvin Johnson, Golden Tate, Marvin Jones, etc.
Way too premature.
dude stafford is a top 10 qb, no way they lose
@@kingspoodler6144 Based on what? He's had good talent and he's been mediocre at best. Thinking Stafford alone makes the Rams SB contenders is like me saying Carson Wentz makes the Colts instant SB contenders.
This isn’t updated, the packers are 5.71 not 5.69, look up pro football reference and it’ll show you.
If you go with all-time records, then include NFL championships,, also known as pre superbowl era.
Yep. Don't know how far back they went. When d AFL was born n 60.
Only Browns fans want that and plus their was like 4 teams back then and no one knew how to play as good.
@@micah2426 as a packers fan I disagree. Also a lot of teams that haven't won a superbowl have won an NFL or AFL championship like the Lions and Browns. Also the NFL has had more than 8 teams most of its existence
@Juju Smith-Schuster yeah ok fanboy
Packers have 13 championships .But, According to ESPN football didn't start until 1967 . NFL is the only major sport that disregards their history.
You know I see a lot of people surprised with the Ravens at #3, without realizing that if there overall winning included the Pre-96 Browns, they'd be #1 on this list. In fact, there overall win record would be above .600 with the Pre-96 Browns.
Oh and the Browns would drop to #32 without the Pre-96 Browns.
Plz tell me how the Pre 96 Browns count for two franchises?
@@rileyfreeman7122the browns moved their franchise to Baltimore and became the ravens, a few seasons later Cleveland started a new franchise and just used the same name
Yeah, that was a major mess up, the new Browns were an expansion team.
Love the way this was presented. No monotone voice over with a lot of useless, and unnecessary, information. Good job!
No
Funky little jam too, for what it is.
Okay the browns and lions all have titles, no super bowls but there were championship b4 1967, if you are counting wins and loses b4 67 you gotta count the nfl and afl championships as well
Well you don't know your history then. You missed a couple yourself.
@@brandonjohnson5503 wtf you mean idk the history? They counted the cowboys win back to 1960, and yes other teams also won championships just ppl act like the browns and lions have never been anything ever when the browns b4 the merger were a very dominant force with Otto Graham and Jim brown
I agree. If only Super Bowl victories are counted, then only Super Bowl era wins and losses should be counted. (and it should be noted that only 1966-present records are counted) If 1920-1965 wins and losses are included, then their respective titles should also be included.
@@adimifus im sorry what do you mean by 1966 records are counted?
No question, totally lame. A title is a title, whether it was achieved winning a TITLE game, or a super bowl.
Weird to count pre-Super Bowl records but pretend that the NFL didn't have pre-Super Bowl titles.
Suggestion: Highest scoring MLB games in history
36/7 one game 1897
Search deeper cuz its already been done
That list might backfire my friend, did you see what happen in the Pirates game the other day....a 24-spot
Highest recorded game was 30-3 rangers beat the orioles
August 22, 2007 - The Texas Rangers, after spotting the Baltimore Orioles 3 runs in the first 3 innings, scored *30* runs during the rest of the game, winning 30-3. Not the biggest all-time, but the most recent extreme blowout in MLB.
Video of that game's highlights is(still?) here on YT.
From Wikipedia:
"On August 22, the Rangers scored an all-time American League record of 30 runs in one game against the Orioles. The final was 30-3. Texas' 30 runs broke the AL record and modern major-league record set by the 1950 Red Sox and tied by the 1955 White Sox, and were the most scored by any team since the Chicago Colts hung 36 runs on Louisville in a game in 1897"
You know there were titles before Super Bowl titles.
He’s not counting them tho
@@Kingkam_77 But he is counting every regular season win a team has had since its founding so it make no sense to not include the championships before the Superbowl era.
@Ben Fetchak The NFL is the only league for which people use this twisted logic. Of course an NFL championship is as important as a Superbowl.
@Ben Fetchak um him basketball video counted all the valueless Celtics titles that was just a big man bullying a bunch of short guys for 11 of 13 years of those count so do the others
@@staringatthesun861 well its not as important but it is still very important bc when you don't count those titles you're making it look like, her they played games and crowned no champion, hey wait did someone in their 20s make this? Lmao
Really love your new stats !
The NFL is much older than since the Super Bowl era. The Packers actually have 13 NFL titles.
Giants have 8,they should go from the beginning like all sports do!!
Thing is with The Pack they won I believe 3 of there championships when the way this was done was there was no playoffs the championship went to the team with the best record.
This discredits the great NFL teams that won NFL Championships. Teams like Detroit Lions and Chicago Bears for example. Your list acts as if those great players and bonafide championship never existed. Lions won 4 titles 1835, 1952, 1953 and 1957 and you list them with NONE….. just as an example
The Bears won 7 NFL championships and you list only one. You have to revise this list so young fans understand that these teams won legitimate NFL Championships before the Super Bowl arrangement
Totally agree. Count all pre super bowl era titles
Yah bro that 1835 team was a powerhouse
Bears won 8 NFL championships and one Superbowl*
@@k3t9q casual
Should definitely include NFL and AFL championships. Of course the Lions won in 1935, not 1835. The 3rd team to win after the Bears and Giants. And in 1935, the Tigers won their first World Series.
As a Bears fan I'm astonished that they're 4th all time in win%...the 30s and 40s and 80s had a lot to do with that
Surprised the chiefs were as high as they were, then I remembered all the 12-4 seasons they went one and done lmao
Been a Chiefs fan since the 80s. As much as I loved Marty he would completely forget how to coach once the playoffs started.
Pain 🥲
@@chiefskingdom_24 I am a Broncos fan and we lost a bunch of Super Bowls in the same fashion that you recently lost yours, I feel your pain 🤣
Crazy to think half the league is still under .500. You should update the titles to include pre-super bowl era. Pack got 13!
huh. still? Uhm. in 80 years if the league is still around, around half the teams will still be under .500. Thats how math works
@@jonathang1700 🤣🤣🤣🤣
That’s how averages work half of the teams are under average half the teams are over average
@@jonathang1700Only assuming they've all played the same number of games which they haven't.
This is my first time watching a video let’s go Baltimore top 3 teams
If you consider the Baltimore Ravens the Pre-96 Browns, then they'd actually have the best overall winning record (Haven't checked in a while but last time I checked it was at around .610, and pretty sure they haven't dipped under .600 yet.).
Obviously this must be based during the Super Bowl Era considering that the Green Bay Packers have won the most Championships in NFL History with 13, Six with Curly Lambeau and Five more with Vince Lombardi. And also you have the Cleveland Browns with a ton of Championships as well thanks to A Legendary Quarterback named Otto Graham.
By the way, believe it or not, the Detroit Lions did win a Championship. Even though it was back in the 50’s, it still counts.
4 titles for the Lions
@@roypavao7498
4 Championships? DAMN! The only one I know of was back in 1950 something. When was the Lions First Championship?
@@Jiltedin2007 1932, 1952, 1953, 1957
32’ they had the best record in the league, and by virtue that was what got them the title.
1952, 53, & 57 all saw a similar outcome; a win over the Browns in the championship game
@@Steve_Hunts96
Thank you. 1952 and 1953 was during The Otto Graham Era of Cleveland when the Lions beat the Browns. The other time Graham lost the NFL Championship was in 1951 to the Los Angeles Rams, the team the Browns beat the year before at Cleveland when their Kicker kicked The Winning Field Goal that very much sailed into Lake Erie.
For 10 straight years Otto Graham brought the Cleveland Browns into the NFL Championship, winning 7 of those times.
@@Steve_Hunts96 Actually in 1932 they tied with the Bears for that title so a playoff game was held to determine the champion and the Bears won that game.
It's amazing how far the cowboys have gone in winning percentage and went from 1 to tied for 1
The NY Giants won a total of 8 not 4 NFL Championships
1927, 1934, 1938 and 1956 in addition to the four Super Bowl championships of 1987, 1991, 2008 and 2012
And the bears have won 9
@@paytonaxtell
Correct. Total of 9
@@tonynardini1472 and the giants have been to 20 tho right? I think that is the record for most been to
@@paytonaxtell
You’re Close 19 Championship games
Won three per super bowl and four of five Super Bowls
@@tonynardini1472 ah
Arizona Cardinals: 2 pre-merger NFL Championships: 1925 and 1947. Please correct.
I love these vids
Genuinely surprised as a lions fan to be in the top 25
Poor Bills. Made all those super bowl appearances but couldn’t win one.
Cause they suck lol. Cowboys>Bills
Same with the Vikings
They had the misfortune of playing against NFC East teams in the Super Bowl. Unlike today, the NFC east was the best division in football at that time.
@@gregkleinfall1901 It probably is the best if we're talking history.
@@gregkleinfall1901 yea, but 4 straight super bowls and they couldn’t win 1? Just one?
Brady gonna put the Bucs over .400. Then when he retires, they'll dip back under .400
They'll probably need a few losing seasons
no way the bucs win teh title again- ive got chiefs or bills this year
Que va sigur solando with that huevon
Idk man, they drafted kyle trask. Hes sitting behind and learning from tom brady of all people i think they'll be good for awhile
Packers fan and a huge Tom Brady fan. I wish he can win another title before he retires.
great video...but what about the games that ended in ties?
I think if you're including pre support bowl records you should include pre super bowl titles.
The wins are over the life of the team, like with Green Bay and Chicago, but titles are only Super Bowls, because Arizona won a couple NFL titles, and Green Bay and Chicago won a lot more, and Buffalo won two AFL titles.
Only super bowls matter
@@freedomxd2733 wrong
@@paytonaxtell nah he’s right
@@liammonaghan4785 no. The NFL isn't 56 it is 102
@@liammonaghan4785 nooe because the nfl recognizes all rings it's only young recency biased idiots and the media that say otherwise
It's incredible the Bucs have the worst overall record in the NFL but have 2 SB wins.
The Bears have won NINE titles , more than any team other than Green Bay. They have won more games than any team other than Green Bay. This video is bogus. There is no rational reason to only count NFL championship games that have been called "Super Bowls!"
In 2002 the Raiders had the highest win % in football. In 18 years they have dropped to 14th lol.
The reason why was because the Raiders held a Winning Percentage of over .700 from 1963(When Al Davis turned the Raiders around) till I don’t know when considering that the Raiders started going into the shitter in the 90’s. COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE!
@@Jiltedin2007 well yeah lol, the reason they had a high win % was cause they won. Duh lol
They were the winningst team in sports in AL Davis youth. It's simple. Big Al got old and started to slip. They lost more as he aged. Then he died. They Have hit rock bottom.
@@bigalsnow8199
John Gruden now has the Raiders turning the corner slowly but surely. Gone will be the days as the Raiders being a doormat to the NFL, plus the fact that the team is now in Las Vegas will be a plus considering that The City of Oakland did nothing for the Raiders and also breached all of their promises to Al Davis, Sr. after luring them back from Los Angeles.
Gruden was the best thing to ever happen to the Raiders as he will make this team do an about face before the time he did come to Oakland before moving to Las Vegas.
@@Jiltedin2007 City of Oakland did nothing for the Raiders but the fans gave them back to back sellouts and support like no other...until the move to L.A. TELL IT LIKE IT IS! After the first move Raiders came back losers and never regained that fan support but Still had all the fan support a loser can expect. Vegas has money...and the Chinese Mafia...but football fans? No one really knows. As long as they win they should be fine but...that hasn't happened yet. Las Vegas won't support a loser...no one will.
Seeing the Cowboys being #2 and the Packers being #1 just brings me chills to my spine
Technically their both tied for first place
Obviously you didn't pay attention as Dallas & Green Bay are technically tied
How are you going to count all of the Bears' 777 victories but not their total of 9 championships?
As a Packers fan I was mad at not seeing 13 championships.
You should include AFL and NFL titles.
Agree
Packers won 13.
Bears won 9.
You didn’t specify Super Bowls, and this is all time record. You should have given coaches Lambeau, Lombardi and Hallas their proper respect.
If it’s not a superbowl it doesn’t count! Lol people like to disregard the forty years of hard fought football before the merger-even though if it wasn’t for those teams like The Bears, Packers etc.-it’s hard to envision the NFL being what it is today.
Can you do an update of this video, please?
:21 - The Arizona Cardinals won the NFL title in 1947, when they were in Chicago. They beat Philadelphia 28-21 in the championship game. :46 - The Detroit Lions won the NFL championship in 1952, 1953, and 1957.
Biggest anomaly is the Vikings with a top 10 winning percentage and zero titles. It’s almost like they’ve tried to screw that part up! 😂
Heartbreakers...
And who can forget the Tonawanda Kardex, with their all-time winning percentage of… .000, as they lost the only NFL game they ever played (in 1921).
Or should I say, who can remember them.
my favorite nfl team is The Dayton Trangles
You should either give records during the SB era or give all-time championships. The former would probably be better, since you would to count AAFL and AFL championships as well as NFL.
If your not going to count championships you should start counting overall wins in the Superbowl era. Brows, lions, and redskins were great organizations in the pre Superbowl era.
I feel like I know you.
@@prisonmike1469 I see you're out of the clink...
@@sethtate2079 yeah the worst part was the Dementors, they were flying all over the place and they would come down and suck the soul out of you.
Crazy how you can win 2 Super Bowls, but win less than 40% of your games
Starting off 0-26 kind of set the tone.
I absolutely did NOT expect the Packers to be #1. As a diehard Cheesehead, it gives me great joy that we can win SOMETHING.
Yall are the original NFL Franchise of course yall are #1
@@nicholausbell2749 Green Bay aren't the original NFL franchise. They weren't even in the NFL's first season. The only two teams that been in the NFL the entirety of the NFL's existence are the Bears and Cardinals
My top three favorite teams on this list are in the top three but out of order
Why would you have 3 favorite teams? Pick one and stay with it.
The Jets: We suck!
The Jaguars: Hold my football!
Putting Bucs last is just motivation for Brady to win back to back. Thanks!
Its just stats, why you acting like its made on opinion
@@chiefskingdom_24 Brady fans always take things personal for some reason
@@bigpanda2000 fr
It’s ok. When Tom gets injured or retires Tampa will go back to sucking tube steak.
Surprised me, and did not at the same time, to see the Lombardi and Landry legacies live on. To be sure, both franchises had great coaches and winning periods after their respective eras, but still noticeable in the history the work that these two men did with the New York Giants together in the 1950s, then with the Packers and Cowboys in the 1960s and beyond.
I think the Bears and the Browns would be higher if the list includes the pre-Super Bowl NFL and the AAFC.
I was done with this the second I realized that whoever made this thinks NFL history started with Super Bowl I.
Do the # of titles include the pre- Super Bowl era?
No. But he does include the pre-super bowl wins and losses
No.
Didn't expect TB to be last
*The NFL existed for over 45 years prior to the Super Bowl era. Those championships count just as much. The correct Top 5 list is as follows:*
*Green Bay Packers: 13 Championships*
*Chicago Bears: 8 Championships*
*New York Giants: 8 Championships*
*Pittsburgh Steelers: 6 Championships*
*New England Patriots: 6 Championships*
*Everyone else: 5 or less.*
Naw, they didn’t go against any comp.
@@shacone3909 *What are you talking about? Fewer teams means far less roster spots, which means you had to be damn good to be on a team. That means far less mediocrity in the league.*
The leather helmet list. Lol 😂
@@shacone3909The Model T is a pos by today's standards, can't consider it a car. Your logic is flawed, if it can even be considered logic at all...
3rd place not freaking bad. 💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾 Ravens for life!!!
I looked it up a few weeks ago, we've only had five losing seasons in our entire 24-year history
Should probably put it as Super Bowl Titles as there was NFL Championship Titles, other than than that not a bad video.
Why don't the pre- super bowl championships count?
Did the video only count the super bowl era?
Untrue on Cardinals. They have 2 titles. The NFL was around a long time before the Super Bowl came around and those 2 NFL titles count as world championships.
They only counted super bowls as titles for.everyone, for example Detroit won the championship the first year they existed but it didn't count because of that.
Imagine winning two titles with a .393 win percentage
well put tom brady on any team they'll win the SB LOL bucs will be dog shit in a year or two watch they'll be back to their 6-10 seasons for 20 more years to come
@@FordFalcon1962nBlue Shut up man we still have talented players in Tampa Bay so whether Tom Brady leave the Buccaneers will still be good no matter what happens.
@@chrisjames588 no they won’t!!!
@@SinaSoh Cry about it fool we're just better
@@chrisjames588 without Brady, you are ass!!!
The Eagles won at least three NFL titles in 1947, 1948 and 1960 in addition to their Super Bowl win
Yeah but nobody really cares what happened before the super bowl era, no offense
@@bigpanda2000
Everyone HAS to care. That’s a dumb comment to make. Those NFL Championships were real and the ONLY NFL championships at the time. That’s the problem…. Your
“ no one cares” comment which degrades all those great NFL teams and championships
@@tonynardini1472 Philly lost in ‘47 to the at the time Chicago Cardinals.
The list should be labeled as all time record in the modern Super Bowl era
Handed Vince Lombardi his ONLY playoff loss in '60.
This is over 2 years old. It said the Rams won only 1 title, but they have 2. They won Super Bowl 56.
It said the Chief had won 2 titles. They now have 4. They won Super Bowl 57 and 58.
You need to redo this graphic. You need to change "Titles Won" to "Super Bowl Titles Won". You're not counting NFL and AFL titles won prior to 1967, and you should. The Cleveland Browns and Detroit Lions have won multiple championships prior to the Super Bowl era, and that counts for something.
Wow the Lions are actually not bad as I thought they were they are more wins than I thought
This is NOT an "All Time Record," if it were this list would include pre Super Bowl wins and titles.
When it reads titles won,does that count NFL titles?
Super Bowls
@@saturdayticket You know,the NFL existed before the merger that led to the Super Bowl
@@hammer5857 I know but if they counted titles the packers would have more than 4 tho
@@saturdayticket I think the Packers have 12 or 13,Im not sure which
@@hammer5857 13, but there was only 14 NFL teams and some of them don't exist anymore. The year Superbowl Superbowl 4 happened was when the AFL and NFL combined and there were a lot more teams, therefore better competition. Which means the Packers did that when the NFL was less competitive. Them the Lions, Bears, Browns, Rams, Redskins, Giants, Colts and Vikings were the only teams that were really good for about a span of the NFL's first 40 years. There are 14 playoff teams every year now. Also, let's say the NFL shortened to like 10 teams, then a few teams would be dominant and when a lot of Superbowls.
Prior to 1970 the Steelers had not won any type of divisional title or league title or any appearance in a post season game. The Steelers had probably the fewest wins and winning pct. Since 70 they have won 6 super bowls, and numerous AFC championships and division titles, definitely the Steelers have benefited most since the merger.
No one counts pre merger and for good reason
Omg. I didn't think my raiders would still be 14th... It's been a rough 20 years lol
GO PACK GO
No only Dallas.
How is Cleveland at 19 and not near the bottom?
They were really good before the merger
Buccs last place with 2 super bowl how
There early years of misery...
Kind of easy when you lose your first 26 games
They have had alot of bad years so that's why
Plenty of lean years in Tampa Bay, plus they didn’t win their first game until their 27th game they played.
Because they were irrelevant trash for decades, that's how lol.
This includes the all time records but only Super Bowl titles. What about the titles from 1920 to 1965? I would have included all NFL and AFL titles or only the all time record during the Super Bowl era.
Im alittle suprised about the colts and patriots but those teams came about in the 2000s
Do the Titans have oilers wins loss lol or Texans can claim
My Vikings are the best team to never win a super bowl! 😃
I think that’s obvious when the competition is with teams that always suck
🦬
Vikings had too many offensive meltdowns in their 4 SB appearances. 6,7,7, and 14 points aren't going to win you many titles. I always felt bad for Bud Grant.
@@garyfaught3769 Don't forget their meltdown in the Championship game against the Eagles!
@@SandstormGD2025 "teams that always suck". Ummm....s'cuse me? Only the Lions fit that description (and the Buccs when they used to be in the Central).
The Bears and Packers rank in the top 5 in winning percentage on this list...both are in their division.
what are you talking about?
The only time the Vikings reigned over the NFC North/Central undisputedly was in the 70s. 60s was fierce competition with Green Bay. 80s was fierce competition with Chicago. 90s was fierce competition with Green Bay. 2000s was fierce competition with Green Bay and Chicago. 2010s was fierce competition with Green Bay.
I stopped watching when I realized you did it wrong. You didn't include pre-super bowl championships.
How high up the list are the Patriots if not for Tom Brady? He accounted for 219 wins and only 64 losses. AND the six Lombardi trophies are the same as the Steelers franchise.
Where does your favorite team rank!?
16. In the middle lol
4
13
16th, just above the no names
26th
two things that stick out
1. Lions despite being a historically bad franchise being 25th
2. Patriots being 5th despite only 2 decades of good play
It wasn't only in the last 2 decades the Patriots had good play, consistently dominant play yes, but not good play. If that your statement about them were true, they never would have had good play outside of two decades.
Why are no ties listed? There has been almost 300 in the history of the league.
Though they didn’t count as half-wins and half-losses until 1972.
Go Cards! I honestly thought we would be last. We almost won the SB in 2009.
Would it be too much to ask for this video to be redone remembering the fact there were nearly 50 years of NFL titles before the Super Bowl? You did count the wins and losses for that period, why not the championships too?
Buffalo won AFL titles in 1964/65, Detroit won several in the 1950's
Forget Tampa Bay. It’s pretty incredible that the Dolphins are #6 and haven’t won a SB in almost 50 years and been below average for the last 20 years
Go Packers Go!!!!!💚💛💚💛💚💛💚💛💚💛💚💛🧀🏈🇺🇸😁😀
Packers#1 👍 Go Pack Go 13 titles
Jjames James-Ah, get outta here, ya stinky cheesehead fan. One of these times my Bears will right the ship, and your "team" will be losing to us instead of the other way around.
@@kevinmiller6380 well it’s happening finally
@@gustavofring3899Nope
Go Titletown!!
I just fast forwarded to the end cause i already knew my Packers were #1...Go! Pack! Go!
Meow 😸
Lats see what happens to Aaron Rodgers
Cowboys are also #1
@@madwrestler1455 lmao he'll stay
@@aaronzarate7956 a loss for the cowboys would hurt more than one for the Packers. Just like in baseball, the more times you play, the less you average will change. A couple of Dallas losses could give Green Bay the solo lead. And that is very likely, as the Cowboys are trash right now. Go Pack Go!
What's the song
I love this list! Cuz my COWBOYS are #2 overall!
Kinda tied for first
@@sfl2636 ...And now with the Crisis going on in GB with AR there's a good chance Dallas will surpass them this season.
@@piijay14 I call it more then a crisis
how does whats going on in GB make dallas bunny hop GB at #1? lol look at the records totally differnet packers started like 40 years before dallas..Dallas started in 1960 if im not mistaken same as many new teams like the broncos , etc,.
@@FordFalcon1962nBlue Aaron Rodgers...
I think the Dolphins at Six will surprise a lot of people.
Without shula,they have never even made an AFC championship game,
Winningest pro team of the 70’s. Very good first half of 80s - mediocre back half of 80’s. Consistent 10 win/season team in 90s.
10 win/season team from 2000-2004 - then dropped- off the map for past 15 years. If this survey was conducted in 2004 - Dolphins would have been somewhere in top 3.
Packers win percentage is .571 and not a tie but okay. List is misleading with titles won anyway. At least the order was right I guess
The nfl existed before the super bowl era
The non SB champions are irrelevant
@@nintendostyle3500 then why are regular season games from the pre suoerbowl Era counted?
@@gabebowers9888 don’t ask me I didn’t make this video 😂
Vikings, only team in the top 10 without a title.
zero and 4 in the SB lol
Their trophy case is still empty.
@@jimdavis2163 - that must be what I meant when I said they are the only team in the top 10 without a title.
Eagles need to step it up with Hurts the next few years
Green Bay Packers have won 13 championships
The real “America’s Team”.
And the true crown jewel of the NFL too.
Most of them were when the were 8 teams in the league 😂
FYI, there have been only one NFL season with 8 teams (1932), but a total of 6 AFL seasons with 8 teams (1960-1965)
Vikings are an underrated team
As a Detroit fan I am utterly surprised that the lions aren’t last
Lmaoo
Because some times they go off n win a lot
The lions won 4 NFL Championships
The arguably were the "Team of the 50's", long before Super Bowls were being played.
I feel better looking at this list as a giants fan
There were about 50 titles won before the Super Bowl existed. You should redo this.
You can't give the total win-loss record and only count the Super Bowl era. You need to go all the way to when the Chicago Cardinals, Chicago Bears and Green Bay Packers started.
As a Ravens fan, l didn’t think they will be #3 overall. 👀😳
Why wouldnt they be? Since their inception in 96, 25 years ago, theyve only had 6 losing seasons.