Twitch FAIR USE | Lawyer Explains How to Avoid Twitch COPYRIGHT TRAPS!!!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ค. 2024
- Twitch Fair Use can be a complex subject BUT I make it EASY Twitch tutorial video. Under Twitch COPYRIGHT rules, use of other people’s music, video, or images is prohibited … unless you can use Fair Use on Twitch. I discuss Twitch Fair Use rules and show you examples of how other Twitch Creators use Fair Use rules on Twitch. By the end of the video, you will understand Twitch copyright rules and Twitch Fair Use rules and you will avoid your Twitch channel ever getting taken down from Twitch copyright strikes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK OUT My 📢 TWITCH DMCA 📢 VIDEOS - CLICK HERE ➡️: • Video
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK OUT My ⭐️VIDEO GAME LEGAL RULES ⭐️ VIDEOS - CLICK HERE ➡️: • Video
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTERS:
0:00 How to Avoid Twitch Copyright Strikes
0:20 How Does Fair Use Work on Twitch?
0:44 What Do Twitch Community Guidelines Say About Fair Use?
1:04 The ONE Exception to Twitch Copyright Rules ... Fair Use
1:30 Twitch Copyright Music | MOST Important Part of the Video
1:42 Are video game soundtracks copyright?
2:19 Twitch Fair Use Category 1: Commentary of Game Play
2:55 Fair Use Commentary of Game Play Is Not a Twitch Copyright Violation
3:52 Are Copyrighted Photos Allowed on Twitch?
4:56 Twitch Fair Use Category 2: Critique of Copyrighted Images on Twitch
6:28 Are You Allowed to Play Copyrighted Music on Twitch As Long as You Don't Upload the Video?
6:39 Can I Be Banned if I Play Copyrighted Music on my Stream?
6:58 Can I play copyrighted music live on Twitch?
7:25 How Sensitive Is Twitch's Copyright Music Detection?
8:27 Are Mixes, Remixes, and Mashups Legal on Twitch?
8:58 How Can Some Streamers Still Play Copyrighted Music Without Issues at All?
9:22 Why Do I Still See So Many People Streaming with Copyrighted Music?
10:36 Are Streamers Likely to Get DMCA'd If They Play Copyrighted Music on Twitch?
12:24 Is a Remix or Mashup Fair Use?
12:48 Fair Use Basics | Key Takeaways
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK OUT My 🌟GREATEST HITS VIDEOS!☄️ - CLICK HERE ➡️: • What TH-cam's Not Tel...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK OUT My 💰TH-cam LAW RULES ✅ VIDEOS - CLICK HERE ➡️: • NEW TH-cam Copyright ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🔥 Check out my videos on COPPA 🔥CLICK HERE ➡️: • What TH-cam's Not Tel...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AUDIO MUSIC & SOUND FX: Thanks Epidemic Sound! for “Sunset Drive” by Future Joust.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The content of this TH-cam channel is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You should not rely upon any information contained on this TH-cam channel for legal advice. Viewing this TH-cam channel is not intended to and shall not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Ian Corzine or West Corzine, LLP. Messages or other forms of communication that you transmit to this TH-cam channel will not create an attorney-client relationship and thus information contained in such communications may not be protected as privileged. Neither Ian Corzine nor West Corzine, LLP makes any representation, warranty, or guarantee about the accuracy of the information contained in this TH-cam channel or in links to other TH-cam channels or websites. This TH-cam channel is provided "as is," does not represent that any outcome or result from viewing of this channel. Your use viewing of this TH-cam channel is at your own risk. You enjoy this TH-cam channel and its contents only for personal, non-commercial purposes. Neither Ian Corzine, West Corzine, LLP, nor anyone acting on their behalf, will be liable under any circumstances for damages of any kind.
© 2021 Ian Corzine. All rights reserved.
#twitchfairuse #twitchcopyright #iancorzine - เกม
12:24 Should 🎸MUSIC 🎹 mixes, re-mixes, or mashups count as FAIR USE?
I am going to say yes because it is like you say the creator is changing the original so it is not the same word for word tune for tune note by note(my opinion )
they do, you just have to know how to word your response to the dmca. All publicly accessible media is available for fair use in their entirety if you know how to answer back to their threats.
sad part is, until you have nothing to lose and are willing to snap back. most companies will walk right over you, knowing you don't know that they are wrong in what they are doing.
What legal rights does Facebook have to ask and keep my 3 forms of identification? Facebook is telling me to have access to my account that I need to provide my driver's license, passport and a credit card statement.. 🤔 I feel that I'm being targeted because of my beliefs and being a conservative.
TH-cam is targeting conservative beliefs and freedom of speech as dangerous terrorists acts.., but if a channel is encouraging rioting, looting, and pushing socialism it counts as safe friendly content.
There is a fun little bit about twitch that pertains to users such as myself, that existed on the platform before the platform name change. the original EULA that was agreed upon was a legal bypass. stating that Justin.tv (twitch) takes no responsibility for content produced by creator's channels and that any person(s) or companies that wish to seek legal actions in accordance with these productions, it falls to the copyright holder to research the creator's personal information and that Justin.tv(twitch) shall not violate it's users rights of private information and will not supply such information to any outside sources.
This wonderful bit has protected me throughout the years (13 years of streaming) and has actually brought up some rather fun legal battles where-in I didn't even have a lawyer present. I looked to the judge and the filing agency and stated that all media used was either privately purchased (protected under the same legislation that allows you to play music while driving with your windows open) or that it is easily and readily accessible content provided via the internet. the same goes for when I DJ via livestream. I'm paying for a broadcaster's liscense, and paying for access to a music library, if said library has copyrighted content and I broadcast it through a livestream, there is no legal recourse they can take against myself as the license and access are from another provider and I have a legally binding framework of affirmation that the content is available for use.
All of which is protected thanks to a 2016 lawsuit where sony went after 15 popular streamers for playing a video game without a copyright release agreement ($50,000 value each). The judge sided with the streamers that so long as they came into possession of the copyrighted content through lawful means (purchase, donations, etc) that they have the right to broadcast their gameplay of such content. The wonderful thing of this judgement was the wording, in it the judge didn't refer to the games as games, he referred to them as media, and in his final judgement he used the term media. There in, When it comes to all media (games, music, movies, etc), so long as you came across it without pirating/hacking it. it's considered public domain.
Oh, and as for the bit of fun. Since most of these companies would use 3rd parties to find my personal information, I was able to file stalking with malicious intent against them. So long as I don't hire anyone to handle my company (editing, streaming, production, etc) I'm still considered a private citizen working for myself. and still protected from stalking. as for the malicious intent, I had to explain it to a judge so I'll explain it here, they were looking me up with the sole intent of causing physical, psychological, or financial harm to myself. (taking down my channel, blackening my name, or fining me). As the judges have said every time I enter a courtroom, "you play hardball, and you're good at it" with the judge presiding over my divorce saying "I don't understand why you aren't a lawyer..."
Thank you for this concise and articulate comment. It is invaluable information.
You know Ian, I never use copyrighted music in my Twitch streams. All the gameplay I have permission from the game publishers with their general fan content policy granted to all streamers. The overlays I use in the live streams do contain copyrighted images from Google. but I edit these images in photoshop to make an overlay for my live stream. I do believe that is a fair use. Because I’m taking someone else’s art and transforming that art into my own. So in all honesty this doesn’t change my game plan because I have been following the rules/law
If these images do not allow to use them for ur own content (Even transformed) then the images u use are a copyright strike.
Awesome breakdown of what is and isn't okay for fair use, thank you! Curious question, would quilt/sewing patterns be considered fair use in videos and streams if they're being used to teach? I know teaching is covered in fair use, but the patterns themselves are copyrighted.
Best thing to do now is just separate your music from the VOD tracks in OBS. All the copyright strikes that happened recently were from clips and VODs so that should save a lot of grief.
how do we do that?
Absolutely, the way I play a song on the drums is significantly different. The key is in the commentary.
i personally feel if you pay for a subscription to a music service such as spotify or amazon music, you should be allowed to play any music from that platform as you are paying for said music and not acquiring it illegally AS LONG as you have the song name and artist name on your stream to give credit to the creator. and that should go for all art forms. you should be required to give credit to the artist when using any art form but it should be allowed to be used on stream.
I have a question, when is it ok to use company brands in your twitch stream and when is it not?
Would it be considered "fair use" to use an image of inspector gadget that I animate to fly around my screen as an alert for twitch? I would also be adding my own sounds effects to the animated image as apart of the alert. Thanks 😁
Hi, already subscribed to your channel because of your great content. But I do have a question however, Is Twitch clips under fair use? Because Im just using a small portion of the whole stream, and I also gave credit to the streamer.
Question about the music..
what if I do like a parody or a cover? let's say I want to do a Billy Joel song and I record my voice singing the song and performing it maybe even change the lyrics, would that be fair use?
A very helpful video. Thank you.
Hi Ian, If i watch a tv show with friends and family via zoom where I share my screen to the watch video is that fair use if we are commenting throughout the show.
I get it I do. Thanks for the very valuable information. But it feels like playing games with handcuffs thinking about these rules while trying to enjoy gaming lol. It is so frustrating. Pay for Spotify to have the music but cant play Spotify while I am in a stream and from the looks of it I cant even just play silently, I have to do commentary the whole time :( oh well casual streaming will prob die for me. Wish music folks would just pair with twitch or something. Or artist sign up .. this makes me sad lol.
Yes, I think mash-ups and mixes should be part of Fair Use, because these can completely transform and/or combine the original works into something very different. Reaction videos should also count as Fair Use if they have a lot of their own commentary / reactions before and after (and maybe during) the copyrighted content which may be used.
There is a reason they are nicknamed “copyright trolls”. At the end of the day record label execs and lawyers get rich while artists see nothing but the fans of their music punished.
I have a question : I would like to stream and comment UFC fights, tennis matches, and Football (soccer) games. Obviously, not showing them live, but using either highlights or replays that are available for free on the official leagues and companies' TH-cam channels. Is that possible?
Thanks for your work.
WOW! And first off, thanks for this info, it definitely helps. Second, if there's anyone who can help me with this DMCA issue, you might be able to. I've actually reached out to Twitch and Square Enix via trouble tickets to see if their legal teams can find a way to fix this issue. The question is how would we petition or see that the US Copyright Office (or whoever is in charge of that) can write an exception in the DMCA and copyright laws for people using in-game music/audio for the purpose of streaming/broadcasting it (the games including the inherent music/audio contained in them) on streaming platforms like Twitch and TH-cam? I'm curious if you might have any suggestions on how we can change some of these laws and rules which can help benefit both copyright holders and streamers/content creators just trying to share the content for their audiences to enjoy which inherently further promotes said copyrighted content.
*What really needs to happen is Some Kind Of Serious Compromise. Not Everybody has that Golden Voice. Not Everybody is Entertaining. Not Everybody likes watching commentary. All Online Gamers Bring Millions of dollars to developers & THEY ARE VERY UNGRATEFUL, NOW CALLING GAMERS FELONS!!! Some gamers make alot of money, some dont. Its like calling an employee a felon when theyre bringing the company money.*
*THEY ARE TRYING TO INCARCERATE THEIR EMPLOYEE, WHEN ALL THE EMPLOYEE WANTS TO DO IS WORK FOR THEM!!*
*Maybe they could make some kind of payment play for all gamers THAT DONT WANT OR CANT USE COMMENTARY, like a payment plan, like when you pay for online VS/FIGHTING Games, services for $20-$60 a year.?*
*What I would really like to see is a boycott to all the gaming industry. No one buys no consoles... No games... No memory cards - NO NOTHING!!! THEN THEYLL KNOW HOW IT FEELS TO BE BETRAYED BY SOMEONE THAT WAS EXTREMELY LOYAL TO THEM!!*
*But then some gaming developers might shut down, Then we all lose. Probly not a good idea... ?*
If we lose out on a company that shuts down, it is worth it! Progress can suck but we need it
8:27, What would you say about "Dance Choreography" TH-camrs and Livestreamers?
Would it also be that no-one has complained/noticed? 🤔
Ian you're doing a lot of good here, do you need anyone to help with PDF's or design stuff, like if you could compile a list of information we could make a cheat sheet in some way.
Hey Jordan. Thanks so much man. Drop me a DM @iancorzine on IG
I really like this idea and would be very interested in having a cheat sheet and sharing it with streamers.
@@synophlex I added him on insta and he just ignored me and probably just outsourced to fiver.
@@jordanolson11 Well, I have been following copyright law for 20 years since Napster appeared. I am very passionate about the subject and have a deep desire to connect content creators with factually correct information. I am not a lawyer or law student however this has always been important to me as I am a musician. If there is anything that I can do I will do it. I have more than enough time on my hands and want to make a difference.
@@synophlex much respect and love to you man, I know it's hard out there, but I know you can do it.
Can we use an sintetic voice to do the commentary ?
I've really had it with any given 'party' claiming something as 'not allowed' or illegal and any given other 'party' claiming the same thing as 'allowed' or legal - and - vice versa.
IT IS WHAT IT IS
'Opinions' can be wrong and too many insist theirs is right.
There's a line in Salt-N-Pepa's "None Of Your Business" that says...
"Opinions are like @$$holes and everybody's got one"
Salt-n-Pepper never let me down.
What about companies like Nintendo that usually strike down videos and channels showing gameplay of their games? Is it possible to use the "fair use" card to appeal these strikes, or if a copyright owner wants the content removed there is nothing to do about it?
@Ian Corzine, what is your take on a voice clip from a movie? For example: Arnold Schwarzenegger saying "GET TO DA CHOPPA!" Etc?
What about if you create and use an alert that involves 15 seconds of music?
I as a DJ really do hope things make it so I can mix live.
i play gta then background have a popular music while you on stream then it cant be silent or turnoff like in a cloth store, yet still get copyright. does it fair?
How would this apply to a live sporting event? Say someone wanted to commentate an NFL game on a Sunday on Twitch?
In my country, Germany, exists the popular old-wives'-tale of tolerance by law when a copyrighted song plays for less than 10 seconds.
I suppose the idea spread, because many TV-shows like to do these short track-demos for pure reference - and consumers easily forget, that an official television-broadcaster can't pick content in a happy-go-lucky manner.
Though demonstrating a few seconds of a music-piece should count as Fair Use - in my opinion - , I would never test my luck with famous songs played on the radio (or official game-soundtracks made by Nintendo).
What if you are commenting on a TH-cam video while streaming? Concerned if CopyRight music comes up in the videos without me knowing. How much is too much?
I imagine you have other fair use videos on here, but I have a question do you think reaction videos could fall under fair use, I understand most people don't do them right cause they show normally the whole video they are reacting to not just the points when they have reactions.
Oh wow you made a small point about reactions on here too but heats the case when it comes to TH-cam over twitch.
Great question! YT has admitted on air that they approve of REACTION videos -- however, as you rightly point out, they have to be done correctly (short clip, comment directly about clip). However, reaction is not a category of Fair Use currently recognized by most countries and US law (see Title 17 US Code 107). So, it is risky BUT it is currently the second most highly-watched category of YT videos, so you've been informed!
So let's say we are watching an anime for reaction content. If we are providing commentary over the copyrighted material does that make it fair use in this case?
Watching this since I'm working on Let's plays on TH-cam myself since I'm curious if this would be helpful since how this mess also applies to TH-cam.
YT is less stringent than Twitch. So, if you're following Twitch copyright rules, you're also following YT's.
@@yoursocialmedialawyer Ah, thank you for the feedback Ian. This really helps me out.
Thanks 😀 sir for providing this important information 😍
It's my pleasure
I just look up copyright free music on TH-cam is that ok?
around 8:30 I wonder, to protect this person's stream and identity and all that would you consider in the future when using examples of this, not showing the information of the streamer so they can get targeted? I'm almost positive people would do this regardless being the internet where you can submit false claims
What if you wanted to play famous music for background music like a song for Billie eylish idk if i said it right and are you able to play that music ?
Hi, this is a great question. I would love to help out and answer any questions you may have! I have a LIVE Q&A show this Saturday.
You can drop your questions and concerns on my LIVE show and TUNE IN.
Kindly check this link to get a notification.
facebook.com/yoursocialmedialawyer/posts/1231061260678010
What if I used a 7 min portion of a horror/action movie but dubbed it in a funny way and not even related to the story? Hoping for your response. Thank you.
What do you do when the Toutube's content ID bot identifies music from one of your gameplay streams, and associates it back to a channel that used that same music for a video, that legally has absolutely no rights to that song in question, yet TH-cam believes they do?
Hey MM. How did YT "associate" it?
@@yoursocialmedialawyer the channel that TH-cam believes has the rights to the song just happened to use the same song from the game I was streaming (Silent Hill) so I'm not sure how TH-cam's content ID system is supposed to be foolproof when it's giving rights to another channel that clearly also doesn't own the music in question.
What about youtubers telling people to use copyrighted music while the streaming is on but never on the vod after the stream ends and twitch doesnt ban?
For the fair use of commentary, is that for any sport?
i'm producing a show and i will have to stream separately audio and video to avoid copyright issues.
yay, im so ahppy
could you play & react to news clips/stories by inserting your own commentary before, after, & during the clips, and it be considered as fair use?
essentially following a standard radio talk-show structure
Can you get a copyright claim or strike on a youtube thumbnail? Like using images from google and making a thumbnail yourself..like logos and stuff would that count as fair use
If you make it your own it would probably go under "fair use"
how on earth this video doesnt have more views
Is it concidered copywrite if you sing a popular song but don't use any other music. So if someone sings acapella would they be against the copywrite law?
Hi, this is a great question. I would love to help out and answer any questions you may have! I have a LIVE Q&A show this Saturday.
You can drop your questions and concerns on my LIVE show and TUNE IN.
Kindly check this link to get a notification.
facebook.com/yoursocialmedialawyer/posts/1231061260678010
Is there a way to fight back against etsy copyright infringement?
Hi, this is a great question. I would love to help out and answer any questions you may have! I have a LIVE Q&A show this Saturday.
You can drop your questions and concerns on my LIVE show and TUNE IN.Kindly check this link to get a notification.
facebook.com/yoursocialmedialawyer/posts/1231061260678010
Happy new year my friend
Your little friend ZanyZara
Happy new year! Zany! Let's make 2021 a good one!
Does badly singing a song (with no background music) as a parody, switching up words while keeping the tune count as fair use?
Is dmca passed cuz that is what I am really worried
Nice video Friend.
There really is a fair use of music that can happen on Twitch or TH-cam, without permission of the copyright owner, but such fair use conditions hardly ever happen.
For a "how to have fair use of music" example, see a TH-cam video critique of the live performance by Hong Kong pop music singer Jane Zhang of the impossible song from the movie "The 5th Element". That critique starts at th-cam.com/video/97C1v9Clh_o/w-d-xo.htmlm10s in the TH-cam video "Voice Teacher Reaction to Jane Zhang - Diva Dance LIVE from the 5th Element". They say that it took Jane Zhang only 3 months or so to learn to step out of the pop music genre to a sufficient degree to be able to sing that song at a professional level with a live symphony orchestra.
I foresee a future where some e-girl or gamer girl occasionally gets pre-approval Twitch or TH-cam for doing music reaction streams or music reaction videos in simultaneous collaboration with one or two or three music experts. I predict that as copyright law gets more severe, spontaneous e-girl only or gamer girl only reactions at the request of chat room members and subscribers will decrease, and pre-approved music reaction events in conjunction with music experts will increase. This trend will work against small subscriber count TH-camrs such as some 15 year old operating out of his or her parents basement, since almost no music experts will work for just pocket change. Millionaire TH-camrs though can hire for an evening or two a whole panel of experts sufficiently qualified to be likely to obtain Twitch or TH-cam pre-approval for a music critique event.
hey Wendy! Thank you so much for sharing this with us! This is really going to help, and I appreciate the time you took with this comment.
@@yoursocialmedialawyer , I am glad that my comment could help you out in restoring some freedom to the Internet.
Copyright law is in 2 different ways in the process of taking freedom from the Internet during the first quarter of the 21st Century.
1. As described by 7 million subscriber count TH-cam member penguinz0 in the 3 million view count December 2020 video "Going to Jail for DMCA Strike", receiving a Twitch or TH-cam copyright complaint on future streams or videos that result in a monetary gain could, especially in America, result in up to a $30,000 fine per valid copyright complaint, and up to 3 to 10 years in prison per valid copyright complaint.
2. Up to a copyright year of 1922, the "little guy" who does not have resources to do copyright research on a specific copyright work can with reasonable safety operate under what amounts to a 100 year rule. Now in the year 2021, if you play some old Thomas Edison type of phonograph record from the year 1921 or earlier, even if the heirs of that phonograph singer of long ago complain to TH-cam, as long as you can prove that that phonograph record was from the year 1921 or earlier, you are not getting sent to prison for 3 to 10 years in America for play of that phonograph on TH-cam, and in addition TH-cam will not use copyright violation ban your video from view in most countries. However, for copyrights that happened in the year 1923 or later, the little guy who does not have the resources do research on a particular copyright work should be operating on a roughly 150 year rule. If you play a phonograph from the year 1923 and you cannot do the research on that particular phonograph record, you should wait until at least 150 years after the year 1923, the year 2073 to do so, or else there is a dangerously high chance that you could get sent to prison in America for 3 to 10 years for the play of that long ago phonograph record from the year 1923.
My belief is that too much of history is already banned from view due to what amounts to a 100 year copyright rule and a 150 year copyright rule. In theory one could receive a TH-cam copyright ban for proving photographicly that the Holocaust, the sending of Jews in Nazi Germany to death camps in World War 2 during the 1940s, was not just a myth. The ban for multiple copyright violation would on the grounds that copyright complained photographs from the 1940s were from less than 150 years ago, meaning that the photographs would therefore be under a reasonable suspicion of truly still being under copyright. Now in America in early 2021, unless Congress in America changes its mind by roughly mid-February of 2021, showing a historical photograph on a future TH-cam video of a Jew being put on a railway wagon while in transit to a Nazi German World War 2 death camp could in theory get the TH-camr involved with posting such photography 3 to 10 years in prison, if one or more resulting TH-cam videos collectively make even $0.01 of income. The combination of what amounts to a 150 year copyright rule with the new felony copyright violation law in America prevents too much of historical interest from being known about in a widespread manner.
For copyright length, I propose 48 years. Publishers have tricks for extending copyright by a number of months, so in practice a 50 year rule would be in effect. A NASA astronaut from the time of the Moon landing would, if a nominally 48 year rule is instituted, be free to post a TH-cam video of his Moon exploits without worry of being sent to prison for 3 to 10 years, and without worry of his TH-cam video being taken down for receiving a copyright complaint based on showing contemporaneous sights or sounds on the Moon or on Earth from the time that the Moon landings happened some 50 years ago, around the year 1970.
We are not reinventing the wheel. We are broadcasting digitally. Here is a law that is over 40 years old that should apply.
Blanket Licence
The blanket license has long been recognized as the most efficient and convenient way of clearing copyrights in the United States. It would be time consuming and expensive for you to locate, contact and negotiate with all copyright holders prior to the performance of each song you plan to play.
The U.S. Supreme Court summarized the virtues of the blanket license in CBS v. Broadcast Music, Inc., 441 U.S. 1 (1979) as follows:
"... the blanket license developed ... out of the practical situation in the marketplace: thousands of users, thousands of copyright owners and millions of compositions. Most users want unplanned, rapid and indemnified access to any and all of the repertory of compositions and the owners want a reliable method of collecting for the use of their copyrights...
"A middleman with a blanket license was an obvious necessity if the thousands of individual negotiations, a virtual impossibility were to be avoided. Also, ...(individual licenses would pose) a difficult and expensive reporting problem for the user and policing task for the copyright owner. Historically, the market for public performance rights organized itself largely around the single-fee blanket license, which gave unlimited access to the repertory and reliable protection against infringement."
DJ sets and mashups should be fair use. Up until DMCA, it took a physical police officer to write a citation. With DMCA, we are allowing AI to computer generate millions of citations at once. I feel that we need to outlaw machines from governing us before its too late. DMCA gives AI an advantage in solving crimes and complex futuristic problems, but it shouldn't step in the way of modern day culture creators. I have been doing a DJ set on twitch and will be using their "appeal" feature and claim fair use. Then maybe it will at least force a physical "cop" of some sort to review each claim IRL. I recommend more DJ's do this in their sets to slow down and clutter the entire system until its impossible to govern.
Great information
Glad it was helpful!
but what about Rhythm Games like Konami's old DanceDanceRevolution? it's a game i know and i'm very concerned about because tha gameplay is tha music and there's no way of controlling tha copyright on music/rhythm games like DanceDanceRevolution sadly :'(
and u forgot to talk about Rhythm Games
Hi, this is a great question. I would love to help out and answer any questions you may have! I have a LIVE Q&A show this Saturday.
You can drop your questions and concerns on my LIVE show and TUNE IN.Kindly check this link to get a notification.
facebook.com/yoursocialmedialawyer/posts/1231061260678010
@@yoursocialmedialawyer i don't use Facebook anymore sadly although i would follow ya on other platforms you restream from
If the only issue with gameplay is that it's not transformative and the person is not making it their own then wouldn't be easy solution to that just be to always be talking and engaging with the viewers? The specific course of gameplay that you do is always going to be your own because you are the one doing it it's not a pre-programmed action that's in the game they didn't make your playstyle they didn't custom animate what you're doing specifically. Taken as a whole it's not just gameplay footage, its running commentary and engagement. Also if it's against the rules to stream gameplay footage without some form of commentary or other transformative element is it also illegal for me to have friends over at my house and they see me playing a game that they didn't buy? It's perfectly reasonable that I could lend someone a video game. It's perfectly reasonable that I could lend 100 people a video game. If that's not against the rules then what's the problem. You buy a video game as a piece of interactive media and the people watching the stream or not engaging with it as interactive media. They don't get the experience of actually playing the game they just get to watch me do it. I think if pressed enough there really isn't much illegal about it. I'm not distributing the game to people for free. If they choose to consume the game in a way where they only want to see or know the story and don't actually mind not playing at themselves then why do we not copyright strike wikipedia for having story summaries of the games? It's the exact same principle! By extension every piece of music featured in the game was put there through licensing and requires extra effort to be played more than just putting in a disk solely dedicated to that music. If a game that I am playing has a really popular song featured in it and I play it with a group of 10 or 20 or even 100 friends that's perfectly fine because I'm not charging them to be there so it's not like I'm making money off of somebody else's media. I think really modern copyright laws are just not built to handle any kind of live media sharing. Every rule is outdated. If gaming companies wanted people to buy the game and play it themselves otherwise they don't get to see or know anything about it then they are going to have to take down all of the story summaries and screenshots that exist on the Internet as well because it's all the exact same thing. In fact those things are even less transformative because they are just direct information without any kind of secondary service to draw the audience (a commentary or something extra).
Yeet! Thanks my guy
i trust you
Thats good
Whats up with all these fake girl accounts
I know ... annoying right?
DJ Maseo is a member of Dr La Soul. He probably has the rights to all of this
Maseo is the DJ for this Hip Hop group De La Soul. Just saying. You pronounced his name wrong too, but whatever 😂
Yeah, I remembered that. How do you pronounce it?
@@yoursocialmedialawyer "Mase-o" like Ace.. Not Mass. If that makes sense.
First!!!
Thanks Tom!
@@yoursocialmedialawyer Love the channel!
Lmao, I am confused again on changing one art into another art and now not being transformative when do simply samplings creating something.. CONFUSION. I know sound garden v. rolling stones, bowie/green v. Vanilla ice... all the greedy Marvin gaye trust suits...but no offense they sound similar but really different new songs only so many chords.
Ok but the video didn't answer the question 90% of twitch streamers want to know. What about a short 3 or 4 second music klip that followers can trigger during a stream
Uploading porn is allowed to twitch or not
useful vid thanks. you can send me your bill for theses15 minutes of consulting to my regular mail dear ian
Don’t do what pokimane did