If you want something like Demo Reel but actually good: Show People. ( 1928 ) Movie Crazy. ( 1932 ) The Bad and The Beautiful. ( 1952 ) 8 1/2. ( 1963 ) Contempt. ( 1964 ) Day for Night. ( 1973 ) F for Fake. ( 1973 ) Any Mel Brooks movie. The other side of the wind. Real Life. ( 1979 ) Camera Buff. ( 1979 ) Stardust Memories. ( 1980 ) The Stunt Man. ( 1980 ) Cinema Paradiso. ( 1988 ) UHF. ( 1989 ) The Quinch Tree Sun. ( 1992 ) Visions of light. ( 1992 ) The Player. ( 1992 ) Ed Wood. ( 1994 ) Living in Oblivion. ( 1995 ) Deconstructing Harry. ( 1997 ) Bowfinger. ( 1999 ) Being John Malcovich. ( 1999 ) American Movie. ( 1999 ) Mulholland Drive. ( 2001 Millenium Actress. ( 2001 ) Adaptation. ( 2002 ) Synecdoche New York. ( 2008 ) Be kind rewind ( obviously ). ( 2008 ) The Disaster Artist. ( 2017 )
I’m pinning this comment because there’s some really really good recommendations here, particularly Day for Night, American Movie, Ed Wood, and Synecdoche, New York
You know, when Dan Olson said Doug’s humor was “what if Batman met Mario”, I thought that was hyperbole. I forgot that there actually was a scene where Bruce Wayne references Mario Mario.
The thing is, the joke could have been decent if done right, but as always Doug had to stretch the joke out for way, way too long and he had to slam the viewer over the head with the punchline.
Doug Walker's content was usually about criticizing movies that you liked as a kid but disliked as you got older, and now people are criticizing Doug Walker's content, even though they liked it when they were younger. It's incredibly poetic, honestly
@@SupremeCommanderBaiser rape? suicide? where did you read that?? i heard about the bad (horrible) workplace attitude that was/is channel awesome, but never rape or suicide
The thing this kept reminding me of was the quote "Doug wants to be a filmmaker, he wants to make art, but he can't. Because he is a fundamentally incurious person who isn't much interested in how other people think or feel. All of his ideas boil down to 'what if Batman met Mario'." -Dan Olson about every 10 minutes throughout this video.
Hey BTW! As far that Mario Met Batman sketch Doug was doing in Demo Reel's first episode is concerned! It get's even worse when you stop and realize that Doug is actively explaining to his audience why Bruce Wayne is dressing up as Mario! Thinking his auideince! To put it bluntly!! Doug is explaining the entire joke!!!! th-cam.com/video/DOP-2ulq2bk/w-d-xo.html
I swear, Doug Walker is starting to sound like a Greek tragedy for the internet age. A man who quit his soul crushing job to become an internet celebrity with dozens of collaborators for an up and coming website who's job has become as, if not more, soul crushing than his previous job. Who's negligence, narcissism, hubris, and just stupid decisions led to all his colleagues leaving him behind. And is now just a foot note of the internet, who only ever gets brought up when looking back on his bad stuff back then, really REALLY bad stuff now, and #ChangeTheChannel. Stuck doing the very job he tried to escape from.
@@frankreads8618 I could see someone like David Fincher do a story about someone like Doug Walker. Fincher has done a lot of interesting character study films like Fight Club, Social Network, Gone Girl. He could definitely make a compelling story of an artist that's so caught up in his vision, he can't see that he's making a big pile of crap.
I would hardly call someone who can, on a week by week basis, gather anywhere from 300 thousands to 800 thousands views on his videos a "foot note of the internet"
@@TheTrainFan9 "He could definitely make a compelling story of an artist that's so caught up in his vision, he can't see that he's making a big pile of crap." That sounds more like Mr. Enter trying to get his own cartoon made.
@@starofjustice1 He did? The guy that acted like Teen Titans Go was the most disrespectful thing on planet earth and up until a few years ago was still editing in Windows Movie Maker? That guy tried to get a cartoon made about him? The egos of some people, I swear.
33:38 He did not! I know this because my friends and I are in this episode, entirely without our knowledge! Although it turned out to be extremely hilarious because my friend was literally cosplaying /as/ the Nostalgia Critic. Doug (in character, I now know) asked who she was dressed as and I snark something about her being "some weird homeless guy", I think.
I love how the major plot twist of the series (that would've undoubtedly taken far longer to pay off had things gone to plan) was that Doug's character was a horrifically bullied child actor. That it was supposed to be an apology for the disgusting treatment of Jake Lloyd over the years that led to his mental issues, and on a greater scale, an apology to all child actors that dealt with trauma from being exploited at such a young age. And the *very first scene* in the series is mocking the then 9-year-old Haley Joel Osment's line delivery in The Sixth Sense.
I love how he had this whole plot about treating child actors better and in his smurfs review he literally said "every time this kid talks cancer gets stronger" like wtf
@@raijinslider6837 the irony is that the aforementioned kid is a younger Jacob Tremblay, who’d go on to have an acclaimed career as a child actor in movies like Room, Wonder, Pixar’s Luca and Doctor Sleep. Would it have gone the same way had the mockery been on Jake Lloyd levels instead of “internet reviewer no one cares for” level?
A smarter or more experienced filmmaker could have made that into a satisfying bookend. But Doug is neither smart enough nor experienced enough despite ostensibly being a "filmmaker" for over a decade at this point
If the Mario joke had ended at "it's time the rest of the world shared my fear", it actually could've gotten a decent laugh. Walker has a real problem with overwriting.
The white face/joker makeup joke got a chuckle out of me, but they held on it way too long. Should've cut before getting a response. The funny part was him asking/the way he asked, the response just made it awkward.
I never watched Demo Reel myself, but I was friends on Tumblr with at least one person who did and from seeing them, I think it was a bit like BBC Sherlock in that they loved what they could make of the show rather than what it actually was. If you take away the kinda offensive real-world origins of Donnie's backstory, play Rebecca's straight instead of as dark 2012 flippant comedy, and actually explore and address the racial struggles Tacoma has, there's a LOT of interesting material to work with and genuine found-family potential. I feel like the fans were going through a refuse heap to find pieces of straw that they spun into gold while, in some cases, behaving as though the gold was already there and ignoring the trash around it. I love the idea of a female abuse survivor and a man of colour teaming up with a bullied bisexual former child star whose mother was destroyed by the movie industry to take it down a peg or two. But it's also the sort of narrative that needs either own voices creating it or very deft handling with the aid of sensitivity readers, which is the polar opposite of 2012 Doug Walker.
I keep going back to this comment because it really captures part of why I wanted to revisit Demo Reel. The way some of its fanbase talk about it, you would think it’s this surprisingly well handled show with a cast of rich and tragic characters and important commentary. And while it has the bones to potentially be something like that, it really isn’t, so fans have to fill in that gap on their own. It’s really interesting to imagine what version of Demo Reel could be made if it actually matched that perception.
"I love the idea of a female abuse survivor and a man of colour teaming up with a bullied bisexual former child star whose mother was destroyed by the movie industry to take it down a peg or two." that actually does sound like something I'd love to watch, too bad it was this.
@@zoeb3573 Yeah, you could really create an incredible BoJack Horseman style show about trauma and how truly shitty and damaging the whole entertainment industry is with that premise. Doug Walker should really be ashamed of himself for completely ruining a potentially interesting idea for a show.
I love that since Doug is such a horrendous actor each of his characters need to have different hats, because otherwise they'd be indistinguishable from each other.
Oh man, tell me about it. Every technical aspect of these clips are horrible: the acting, the directing, the writing, the camera work, the lighting. I thought I was going to die of second-hand embarrassment during every clip.
Considering Doug got (justifiably) angry at the movie Patch Adams for the way it misrepresented a real man's life and distorted the tragic death of his male friend in order to repurpose it for the death of a female love interest who didn't exist its EXTREMELY hypocritical what he ends up doing with Jake and Elizabeth's real struggles here. Does he think because Demo Real isn't an attempt at a biopic it means he can pull the same crap he was previously condemning?
It fucks me up so much whenever I notice that Doug is FILMING HIS LIGHTING EQUIPMENT. Literally 80% of the shots in demo reel have pretty nice-looking softboxes, light domes, and multiple stands in the background, and yet EVERY SINGLE SCENE is over or under exposed. He's literally only using them as props to remind us that he's playing the part of a "director" on a "movie set" and my mind can't even comprehend how dumb that is. USE YOUR LIGHTS.
Doug literally burst out laughing when he was told he should provide WATER to a crew of several dozen people filming in the DESSERT. So that doesn't surprise me at all.
@@timothymclean But that's effort Doug can instead use to superimpose his incredibly shit bargain bin "animations" on the screen while he makes an Ernie Hudson refference !
God, any time I hear about Doug Walker I have this weird feeling of melancholy. I used to watch him all the time, he was the person that got me invested in films and filmmaking and now... idk.
I have a similar experience. Nostalgia Critic got me through a lot of rough times mental health times and I looked forward to watching it at the end of a long day. I’ve moved on but it’s still... it’s hard
I feel the exact same way. Like, the idea that you could think things in a movie were bad was just so novel to me and got me into filmmaking as a career option. it's wild to think about.
Ditto. I used to really look up to this guy. I mean, he was one of the few and the proud who broke away from a normal job and became a full-time entertainer outside of the Hollywood system when that still wasn't the norm. He basically had a budding empire on the old website, That Guy With The Glasses.com. He always seemed like a great guy in all the behind-the-scenes footage, and as far as early internet motion-picture content goes, The Nostalgia Critic and his other characters were just about as good as you could get. But... then he blew it all in 2012.
@@jadedheartsz And yet there are people who entered the business of online content creation up to a decade after he did who have enough to subs to make him look like a grain of salt by comparison. There are people who started making web videos up to a decade after him who have transcended into the mainstream. Doug's one million subscribers isn't that impressive when you consider this.
19:06 Right here. This one single dumb moment is a perfect summation of why Doug Walker's attempts at comedy consistently fail, and it's not necessarily because "lol what if batman met mario??" In this moment, he did it. he told a half-decent joke.There's some comedy to be gleaned from Bruce Wayne being so terrified of Mario for some reason that he thinks to dress as him to terrify other people! It's absurd comedy, but it's comedy! All he had to do was stop at "it's time the world knew my fear" and he'd have a joke with a punchline! It's so close! ...and yet, he keeps going. He can't just leave it there; he needs to have Alfred stop and ask *why,* and then he has to stand there and *explain the joke.* He flew right past his own punchline and completely blew any comedic momentum the scene might've had. This is not an isolated screwup; it's how most of Doug's comedic writing is. He'll do something absurd and ridiculous, sometimes juxtaposing opposite things to really lean into the absurdity...and then shoots himself in the foot by talking too much, or giving his actors too much to say. It's like he's not confident in his ability to get a joke across and let his delivery do the legwork so he has to keep fucking going so you're *sure* you know that yes, that was indeed meant to be a joke. Would his work be good if he showed some restraint? Probably not. Would it be *better?* Probably, yeah.
i seem to recall his old videos having some similar jokes, but the key difference was that they didn't drag on *too* long past the punchline, and were a lot more self-aware about how the rest of the scene is taking the piss out of the joke. like there used to be some legitimate writing chops there once upon a time but i fear they've long since been lost
This is exactly what he does all the time. I actually got a chuckle out of the idea that Bruce Wayne might be identified by his hand but he dragged out the whole one-gloved Batman thing for a full minute. It seems like when he can't decide which joke he wants to make about something he'll make all of them instead of just making a joke and moving on to something new.
Didn't College Humor have a video with that joke, but way better? Like, Batman gets hit with Scarecrow's Fear Toxin, and he's hallucinating and Crane is reveling in it, until he realizes Batman is afraid of stupid shit?
In the fullness of context, the Nostalgia Critic suit up at the end feels a lot less 'Tony Stark donning the Iron Man mk3 for the first time' and a lot more 'Darth Vader coming off the operating table at the end of Revenge of the Sith'.
I remember liking the Nostalgia Critic's early reviews, because he made some good points sometimes about movies. For instance, he pointed out that the Care Bears movie *could've* done the predictable thing where the movie talks about love saving the day and then has something else do it, but instead stuck to its' moral. He talked about how Captain Planet trying to tackle AIDS was really out of its' depth and in retrospect feels poorly done and almost disrespectful. And when he reviewed an episode of Batman: the Animated Series that had a disabled villain, he really had a lot of sympathy for her and talked about how the world failed her. When I was 12, he seemed like a comedian who, as loud and ranty as he could get, had kindness to him and wanted media to not be dickish or insensitive about some topics. Then Demo Reel hit. The sensitive topics were handled so poorly that it ripped apart that mental image of him I'd had, made worse by the series not being very good. Eventually I just stopped watching him and watched other creators I'd found via the site instead. I think your video is the first time I've seen anyone point out how uncomfortable and gross some of the jokes/Doug's character's backstory is, so I'd just like to say thank you. For years I've wondered if I was being too sensitive, but now I realize that 1., it's valid to be made uncomfy by this, and 2. a lot of this was bad at the time, it's not merely a matter of it aging poorly.
Even the way he digests other people’s opinions on movies (i.e. Someone going “Oh, I actually love that movie!”) felt off over the years. Like, sure, the critic himself was known to shit on other peoples’ love for movies he felt were bad, but I felt it was played off as a legitimate character flaw rather than something to support. Meanwhile, non-NC Doug would make it clear that it’s only a silly character thing, and that it’s OK to like movies others might not like. They are movies, after all. Post-reboot, though, things started to feel off. He would start to write fans of certain movies as antagonists in NC (like the “dumb” Adam Sandler fans). His non-NC stuff also started getting a little iffy to said fans, as well. It made me feel rather confused. Like, *is* Doug Walker tolerant of those who like movies he doesn’t? Was the pre-reboot stuff BS or did he legitimately change for the worst over the years? I know this is different from what you’ve mentioned, and maybe this is an unusual point to talk about, but I’ve definitely slowly backed away from Doug’s content for awhile partially because of this (plus the fact that the humor in it just wasn’t personally for me anymore). The whole “not-so-awesome” ordeal didn’t help, either.
I’ve learned in recent years that if you ever find yourself asking “am I being too sensitive,” you’re probably not being too sensitive, you’re probably justified in reacting the way you are People who actually make a big deal over nothing usually don’t have that kind of self-awareness, and toxic people love to use the “you’re being too sensitive” defense to justify the horrible things they do
The issue with Doug Walker is he only knows how to write one type of character and style of humor: basically a Yakko Warner and/or Groucho Marx type character - flippant, snarky, always one step ahead of everyone else, and constantly winking at the audience with random non-sequitur absurdist humor, meta-humor/fourth-wall breaking, and pop-culture references. This character archetype is rarely self-deprecating and constantly torments his co-stars, but theoretically gets away with it because the Universe they inhabit is supposed to be an absurdist realm that transcends any notion of morality. You can tell Doug watched a lot of Animaniacs or Bugs Bunny and loves those type of characters. The problem is that Yakko (along with Yakko's progenitor, Groucho Marx) were written by people with a lot more talent and restraint. These types of characters need to be written in a way that plays up the absurdist nature of the Universe they inhabit - they exist in an amoral Universe where you can torment someone and it's funny. But if mishandled, it's easy for this type of character to come off as egotistical, mean-spirited or nihilistic. I think Doug just too often veered into the nihilistic, mean-spirited side that easily emerges if this type of character doesn't stay firmly within the realm of the absurd. Plus, he depends way too much on obvious, over-saturated pop-culture references or parodies that had already been done to death.
I'd recommend watching the vlog "Doug's Top 15 Comedic Influences" from years ago. Explains a lot. He does say that Looney Tunes and Animaniacs are both big influences on his comedy and you can definitely see this. Like a lot of his popculture humor and meta-humor feels very Animaniacs-ish just done with microbudget live-action instead of good animation which detracts a lot. I'd argue you can see the Looney Tunes influence most blatantly in something like Kickassia. However it's actually Daffy Duck who's the biggest influence on the Critic's character. Not Bugs Bunny. He's also cited characters like Professor Fate from The Great Race and even the Queen of Hearts from Disney's Alice in Wonderland as influences on the character. As in, loud angry insecure comedy-foil antagonists. But there's more besides that.
@@TheSoulvian and another influence is the show Blackadder starring Rowan Atkinson as a family of mostly snarky, deadpan, intelligent straight men surrounded by a world of idiots. What works about Blackadder is both Atkinson’s smooth performance that doesn’t make the audience hate him, but at the same time the narrative knows that the protagonists are jerks and so they often get their comeuppance at the end of each season or at least are portrayed as being the terrible people they are who are basically villains.
I think a big problem is he internalized the "the root of comedy is pain at someone's expense" as the inherent basis of comedy rather than a generalization on how it often functions. It explains why something like his The Wall parody is both so fascinating and frustrating at the same time - he sabotages any comedic potential out the gate because he's so hyperfixated on being snarky and building up the most juvenile criticisms he can through awful "parody". It's even worse because there's plenty of bits in the source material that would actually make for a funny parody or analysis, but he essentially has to ignore everything the movie shows or says to either mock a non-sequitor or engage in weirdly self-aggrandizing segments where he can just say his opinions as a character in the narrative
@@FronkZappa Even when I was still a megafan of Doug, his statement that comedy should be based on misery always bothered me. I always thought that comedy and horror are opposite sides off the same coin. They both brings in an intense atmosphere and build up to something and then they hit you hit with a payoff. Misery can't part of that, it is common in both comedy and horror that characters are suffering greatly. But you can point to plenty of comedies (and horror movies) where the characters aren't suffering that are still great. Hell, one of Dougs major influences, MST3K, is a great example of that. Now you can argue that the characters are suffering from watching bad movies, but the true meat of the humor of the show is they are shouting one-liners based on whats happening in the films.
@@backtoklondike I think you're probably right, and same about the "misery is the basis of comedy". Horror and Comedy both (as far as I can tell) work by subverting the normal. Horror abjects to create discomfort which then brings terror, and comedy does the same except it brings humour, and the line between the two seems to be very thin, which is actually very odd. Anywho, I don't think Doug understands that, and there is a certain irony that a man whose only understanding of humour being misery is now stuck in his own karmic hell. I know there's a lot of controversy surrounding him but still. Poor guy.
I think it's fascinating, as you say, to see how, with more work and a change in tone/discussion the over-arching plot of Demo Reel, if incorporated earlier, would have helped shape and define the series. Like, when you unpack the backstories of the main three, and even, to an extent, the joke cameramen, you find that they're all struggling with legacy/history. Tacoma was awarded for taking down HIS FATHER'S Ponzi scheme, and now no one will give him work. Rebecca is fighting against a sexist and neglectful system while dealing with trauma from childhood sexual abuse and neglect. The crew are implicitly former criminals, working in a legitimate business. A Demo Reel is, by definition, presenting an Actor's past as evidence for their future: here's the good things they did, hire them. The COMPANY Demo Reel is attempting to remake movies that they think failed. The entire series is thematically, all about second chances, on overcoming your past and making something new. Even the specific movies chosen for parody/homage have plenty of space to explore these themes, and how the industry treats women and actors of color, allowing for actual character arcs. Hell, you could even use the redemptive idea/labor of love argument as the counter to the Swede Actor's Guild at the end: it doesn't matter if their movies are GOOD. Making good movies didn't save Dupree's mother. Making bad movies doesn't mean Dupree doesn't have fans. People need things that make them happy, and it's not your place (or, as the pay-off to the character arc) Dupree's place to render judgment on them. But the show, as presented, is almost unaware of these connections, or thinks it would be dumb to delve into them for more than a couple moments. It HINTS at a good narrative, without fleshing it out.
If only Doug Walker was a better writer, Demo Reel could have said something. Something purposeful, meaningful, coherent. Instead, we have "What if Batman met Mario?", jokes about sexual abuse, and appropriated tragedy that builds to nothing.
Doug has little interest in anything aside from getting a laugh, which does make it odd that he even invoked such controversial subject matter, I guess he was trying to give his humor some teeth.
I think the deeper problem is that Doug Walker isn't capable of following through on any of that. Dan Olson really hit the nail on the head when he said that "Doug wants to be a filmmaker. He wants to make art. But he can't, because he's a fundamentally incurious person who isn't much interested in how other people think or feel. All of his ideas boil down to 'what if Batman met Mario?'." In order for Demo Reel to have gone in the directions that are implied would require someone who understands narrative, and Doug Walker doesn't. At all. He doesn't get *why* good movies work, and his understanding of why bad movies are bad is limited to surface-level plot holes or plot contrivances -- the Cinemasins "gotcha! I win" grade of criticism.
That ending just gave me an intense flash of existential dread imagining this from Doug’s perspective. It’s like a monkey’s paw kinda thing, he got exactly what he wanted but in the worst possible way.
@@jadedheartsz The editorials are definitely still great to rewatch. If he only did stuff like that without his dumbass personality and all that shit.... I'd still be watching.
@@jadedheartsz lol The Who meaning of “stagnant” is unmoving and unchanging. CA has lost most of its creators and exclusively relies on NC to stay open. That’s literally stagnation. I know you’re autistically obsessed with NC, and any criticism of which hurts you on a deep emotional level, but you gotta move on from this manchild phase. Because right now all you’re doin is proving that the only people who watch NC these days are sad manchildren, and actual children.
The craziest thing about Doug Walker and Demo Reel to me is that the man spent years and years watching movies and tv shows and riffing on what made them bad, and yet he doesn't seem to have . . . internalized any of it? Like, he learned nothing about filmmaking or what makes a joke successful or how to create compelling characters. You really have to WORK to remain that ignorant. Especially because (per the Not So Awesome document) some members of Channel Awesome who were actually trained filmmakers offered to help him and he shut them down.
I wonder if maybe Doug is one of those people who only looks at the surface level of the media that he consumes. People like that can recognize that something is good but they don't understand WHY it's good. They don't attempt deeper analysis because they view that sort of thing as pretentious and unnecessary. Since they only look at the surface level, they THINK they understand everything that they need to.
I feel like Doug has this mindset that he's just a silly internet critic, so he can get away with cruddier content. There was a video he made where he was responding to criticism of Kickassia in his "ask that guy" character. And his attitude was essentially, "I'm providing you with free entertainment, you have no right to complain"
@@StarlightPrism It definitely seems to be the case that he's not an especially deep thinker, and the Nostalgia Critic wasn't exactly what you'd call hard-hitting analysis. It's just odd to me that someone who cares enough about sketch comedy to want to make a career doing it devoted so little time and brainpower to understanding what makes it work.
I think it's very telling that so many of the people Doug hurt an alienated have gone on to do video essays about him, and the bulk of their reactions are not hate or anger, but a sort of sad, tired pity.
Who did? All I've seen from the people I watch/watched were like 'please refer to the Change the Channel document I don't want to talk about it anymore'
@@annamaria9073I really love Kyle Kallgren (Brows Held High)'s essay "Nostalghia Critique." I wouldn't say that one isn't angry, but I'd definitely say there's a lot of pity to it as well
@@margaretmadole oh I haven't seen that yet. Hold up I have to do something. Edit: I like it, but I feel it's more about the work of a reviewer on TH-cam than about Doug or Channel Awesome
So bizarre to think that there was a time when Doug Walker was popular enough, and Arin Hansen obscure enough, that an episode of Demo Reel could have a cameo from Egoraptor. 2012 was a WEIRD year.
Arin Hansen obscure in 2012? Nah. He'd been immensely popular since 2008. Granted, he was known primarily as Egoraptor/ an animator rather than that Game Grumps era Arin but regardless: to label him as obscure in 2012 - even obscure 'enough' relative to Doug - is a little strong.
@@inspectorjavert9868 not really. 2012 was when bronies were widely accepted. I know cause I used to be one for a brief period. The brony shaming came much later.
@@MeansofIntrigue Well, it's all about degrees. People who were in the know and who liked funny internet animation knew Egoraptor. The individual videos were huge but Egoraptor wasn't a "brand" the way Game Grumps is now a massive brand, or the way Nostalgia Critic/Channel Awesome was (trying to be) a brand.
Can we all acknowledge the irony that, as you go over at first, the Nostalgia Critic, a show whose entire premise is that things you liked as a kid often turn out to be not that good when you re-watch them as an adult, is now, for you and lots of other people, something they liked as kids but found to be kinda bad when watched in adulthood? That's some Shakespearean tragedy shit, right there. He could save others, but not himself.
I've known in passing that "demo reel was really bad" but I never knew that it really was THIS BAD, hot damn. This took me on a JOURNEY. Incredible first video!
@@fakegeek5462 Trigger warnings exist for a reason. People get 'triggered' by talk or depictions of traumatic events. A warning allows them to prepare, or avoid re-living those events in their mind. The fact that one was included shows consideration for the video's audience, and is in no way 'childish' - quite the opposite.
I actually ran into Rachel Tietz at a local theater. I had seen her in some of the "return of the Nostalgia Critic" episodes, and found her honestly very funny with great comedic timing. So I said I was a "great fan of her work with Doug Walker." (So I wouldn't embarrass her by explicitly saying she was in crappy internet stuff) I feel now like it's a backhanded insult.
I'm also glad Malcolm Ray is starting to get more attention thanks to Lackadaisy, even back then he was shown to be a surprisingly good voice actor and now he can finally show off his skill
@@jadedheartsz I would disagree on the "talented" part but he's a known asshole who covered his boss when he sexuality assaulted several woman so literally who cares if he's talented. Also there's the whole thing about how he treated the actors on the set of "To boldly flee" it's a long story but if ever want to look it up it's terrible and he basically left the actors to get hungry and dehydrated during a very hot day and was an overall asshole on set. So yeah. Don't care.
Me : I don't support Doug Walker because he covered for a rapist. You : It has been proven to be untrue so you're an asshole. ??? That insult sounds so bad on your part. Like omg I'm so sorry I believed several 1 hour videos that explained everything in detailed and confused TGWTG producer with Jew Wario after several years of this happening while there are stil several accusation of different kinds on Doug and his brother and the former producer of TGWTG anyway. Also good job at linking a video of a guy who turned off comments and likes and starts the video being ultra defensive surely this'll be a good video. Also he even states himself that Channel Awesome is still terrible so why are you attacking me like that hello ?
@@ElvenRaptor Lol I wrote a 3rd reply and TH-cam said "Nah fam don't bother" and the comment didn't show up so even them knew x) Yeah I saw him replying several other comments. Dude needs to chill. I mean I'm literally siding with him and saying I was wrong and dude calls me a liar after calling me an asshole because I believde what several hundreds of thousands also believe to be true... like ok...
I hate entitled critics who think their word is gospel. I hate even more the audience who enables them. Cinema Sins and Doug Walker even did a crossover years ago.
It's a little unfair to compare the two tho, because at least cinema sins doesn't have controversy about an abusive company and don't add stupid skits In the middle of the sins count. At least there make an attempt at a review. At least they don't proclaim that they love the films they are "critisizing" and then stepping on that claim with high heels. Cinema sins may be a bad place to look for actual review content, but at least, at least, someone could enjoy it, and laugh at it. Nostalgia critic fails to do these things.
@@vanroyal244 As much as I find Cinema Sins to be bad for reviews, disconnecting it as a review and it can be enjoyable as dry humor making fun of nitpicky reviewers
At least the guy making the comic had a reason for doing that. He was trying to deal with his own personal trauma. Doug, on the other hand, just made things up as he went along.
Loss at least delivered a pretty powerful scene (even if it's just a 4-panel comic). I remember finding it without knowing CAD nor having any context and being confused at the memes. The comic is earnestly sad and makes a lot with no dialogue.
The ending about how Doug Walker is a sad figure in that he is stuck in a role he no longer finds enjoyable is especially sad when you remember his video where he walked out of his "dead end soul sucking office job". How is the Nostalgia Critic different from where he was before?
@@jadedheartsz Idk about that. It's been a minute since I've watched NC, but I do recall multiple times when he talks about how stuck he feels from time to time. I've seen entire episodes where he compares the channel in its early days to what it is now.
As absurd as this may sound, it kinda makes me wish someone would do a dark comedy biopic in the vein of Ed Wood or Disaster Artist about Doug Walker as this as this young, aspiring office worker who breaks into the You-Tube scene early on and gets corrupted with time into this sketchy, abuse-ignoring businessman who does a gig he clearly hates for years and watches all of his old fanbase turn on him.
@@jadedheartsz But like, he kept it hidden from the public, to the point where people didn't know about that until after JW died, and the document is filled with other cases similar to that (where the CA crew kept things under wraps and didn't get authorities involved). Also, like, if he still kept all his subscribers since day one, why have their been so many fan backlashes and people unsubscribing en masse after everything from videos like the Cranks one or the Change the Channel situation? It feels like a lot of those subscribers are either new to the channel or are unaware of everything involved with it.
@@jadedheartsz Yeah, because women being smuggled into women's shelters into the middle of the night is a sign of a loving, respecting employer who deserves defending at all costs. You seem way too sold on Doug's narratives and I'm not continuing this conversation if you can't admit that he did his employees wrong (plus, keep shaming Alison when, at least to her credit, she didn't lie about and blacklist a former co-producer stealing their significant other without said person having any feelings for them to begin with like a certain Brad did). I hope you enjoy knowing that Lindsay Ellis and Linkara will never collab with Doug again.
41:07 Jake Lloyd actually went to my elementary school many years before I had attended, and the teacher I had for second grade, Mrs. Talbot, was the last teacher he ever had through the public school system. She used to use him as the example for our class about how bullying can happen to anyone, as he was pulled out of school after all his peers relentlessly picked on him for his acting in Episode I and his small stature
That part about Doug’s homage(?) to Jake Lloyd and Elizabeth Hartman sticks out to me, because it really speaks to Doug’s failure to effectively communicate his ideas using the medium. As Dan Olson might put it, Doug just doesn’t understand the language of comedy. He doesn’t understand that using similar-but-different names for story elements makes it sound like parody. He doesn’t understand that using real-life events as backstory for an intentionally obnoxious, whiny character who we’re meant to laugh at frames those events as being kind of a joke too. And he doesn’t understand that positioning an over-the-top kidnapping as next in this sequence of events just… undercuts everything.
this description of the demo reel s1 finale just makes me think of "loss": Hack creator gets tired of writing D- comedy, tries to write drama instead. The result is still awful, and it's even worse bc the creator's main idea is "bring up a really heavy subject, just toss it at the audience like a big dead fish."
This actually could be an interesting topic for a whole long form essay. When creators feel pinned in by their funny creation and feel compelled to make something that involves a big rug pull at the end in an attempt to make pathos.
When I watched Doug walker at first I assumed the shitty skits that happened during the reviews were shitty on purpose and that Doug was full of himself because it was funny. The more I learn about him the more I realize they were just shitty and Doug is just kinda full of himself.
I can't believe that I thought that NC and AVGN were so similar, now when I look back at it I see that James is a beautiful person and not like AVGN, but Doug... I don't want to remember him and I'm a little bit ashamed that I liked him
@@yakovradloff I watched Doug when I was pretty young and while it helped to spark my interest in media analysis it made me have so many dumb cringey takes as a kid so I can totally realte to being ashamed about liking him lol.
@@yakovradloff Don't be. Doug did a good job pretending to be someone much better than he really is. It's not your fault you fell for the ruse. We all did.
Ive only seen one nostolgia critic review, and I never watched again because he complained that "It was too different from the source material," then in the same video said "They didnt change up enough from the original vereion." Literally contradicts himself with complaints lmao.
The problem with Doug Walker is not that he's untalented, is that he refuses to accept it and progress in his craft. He was surounded by so many talented people and he, instead of learning from them, cliped their wings to be as bad as he was. I don't feel pity for him, he's so full of himself he never grew.
@lucy y yeah, he is, but that is not necesarily a problem. You can learn and develop a talent, but he refuses to, that's the real problem (in my eyes at least).
Essentially he got in on a very short-lived trend when something like the early NC made sense, and refused to notice there are only so many films where his shtick truly works or how the rest of the world moved on. He thought he established a new paradigm for how things are done in this age of -internet- -Web 2.0- social media, old rules don't apply, yada yada... And, in a way, he did, "some dude's over-the-top rants on pop culture" shows, some as old as Nostalgia Critic, are alive and well. But they moved on in a way NC really didn't. (AVGN slowed down as the supply of truly awful retro games that could justify that sort of thing started to exhaust, and started doing less ranty reviews of other media, Angry Joe added news, streaming and cinematography and production values Doug Walker never had...) NC missed that bus and is stuck as a low-effort rant show and nothing more now. OTOH, he could have gone full Carl of Swindon or something like that and got another few years of glory in 2014-19... It's a good thing he didn't.
@@nebufabu Totally agree. Plus with AVGN, James had other video ideas and experience that generally went over well with his fans. I checked channel awesome (haven't watched in a decade) and he's doing weekly NC videos. Who still watches that stuff? Lol
This entire video makes me want to walk up to Doug Walker and tell him: "I want you to make a movie. It can be a short movie, maybe thirty minutes if you want. But it must not contain ANY references or jokes to any other movies nor can it be in any way about the film industry or about criticism. It can be a comedy, drama, romance, comedic drama, anything. And preferably, it should not include any characters that you have played so far." If he were ever to do that, if he ever were forced to make something that is completely original and has no references to other works, I would be curious what the result would be.
Personally… I think he’d have an existential crisis and would implode, perhaps having to take a break from any and all work as the thought of making something original spirals into a deep-seated phobia that never is able to fully leave him. Like some kind of Lovecraftian boogeyman that is always watching Doug, but is *just* out of sight and everyone thinks he’s just going crazy because he can’t articulate the horror he feels… Or he’d just start it up, immediately get tired of being original, and then immediately break all of your rules you had for him.
He would have to actually think for once. Doug has the same creative muscles as the people who made RWBY. They only know "creativity" from the stuff they consumed so they basically just make references or steal content whole cloth to make their abominations. Here's what I would do given your challenge if I was in Doug's shoes. It would actually be a movie where he isn't the main fucking character for once. It would be a movie about someone else struggling with depression. 10 years out of college with a writing degree and struggling to write about something meaningful and deep. Their whole writing career online was writing smut for MLP. He dawns a new pen-name and starts being serious. The reality is that every time he tries to write something serious it gets laughed off for being amateur. Eventually they try writing children's stories and he finds success until his account gets hacked and he's ousted as a MLP fanfic writer. We see the rise and fall of a writer who can't escape his past.
@NobleAbsinthe A couple sentences into your synopsis I was like "should I tell him that's just Avenue Q?" and then you really diverged and yeah...that'd be good. I personally would go for a time-lapse angle, showing how the multiple fandom they like DID bring them happiness (even if in a shitpost kind of way) and then yada yada the rise and fall and shame but end it on a bittersweet sort of note showing that they do have _potential,_ they have skills they've curated from all the past work they've done and there are many avenues of work they can persue, but they have get out of their own way. Ego, accepting past faults and shame, recognizing their supporters, etc etc. A fictional story about a lolcow essentially lmao. But Doug could never take that kind of angle, he'd either shit on them relentlessly and lose the sympathy part or just make the Gary Stu a self insert.
@@jadedheartsz it’s a self-defeating cycle of defending someone/something in a thread full of people only here to bash it. Walker’s collaborations with other creatives with notable celebrity like Don Bluth, James Rolfe, CinemaSins, TeamFourStar, among others voice actors and charitable efforts isn’t really up for debate as to his success as the Nostalgia Critic - he’s done alright for himself considering. This very video is the only popular content for Lady Emily, whom is profiting off of pointing out the failures of someone else who so far is way more successful than themselves, the same way as NC does/did. The folks here are hear to pile on hating Doug & laugh at his poor choices and not hear any counterpoints to that feeling. I came for “the tragedy of Demo Reel” too, but not to crap on NC as I still do enjoy his work on Channel Awesome. Demo Reel was a curiosity of a passion project that Doug still thinks has potential 8yrs after its failure; I came to see the origins of that. The show IS pretty crap though, yet it’s kind of a fascination that the remaining Channel Awesome team still looks to Demo Reel to draw inspiration from their biggest failure because they continue to have faith that they can make it work.
@@aztn19 I think the problem with most of the people you mentioned is they got so big SO quickly and never realized how fleeting their success is and sadly most of them dont have a backup plan. Doug for instance kind of self inflicted his wound by killing the Critic to make this show which drove away his audience (though i will also be fair to Doug and say I think he surrounded himself with people who are just toxic to large audiences and then having Blip shut down did more damage long term to CA than killing the Critic did). Im watching now as it really seems that TFS is going down the same route as CA where they kill off the golden goose and frankly arent replacing it with somthing people want to see. Honestly as cruel as it sounds Doug is a great example of what you cant do if you become sucessful which is put yourself before your audience and videos like this kind of need to exist to show where the flaws are so other people dont do the same thing
@@jadedheartsz No it doesn’t. Working with an acclaimed director doesn’t make you successful, anyone with money can work with acclaimed people. But since you start resorting to insults, I highly doubt you can comprehend an intelligent conversation. And calling me a troll because I disagree with you opinion also just goes to show that you are intellectually stunted as I assumed you would be.
I feel bad for Malcolm Ray in particular. When he's given an acting role, he is a good actor. He's believable in the character he plays and he's wasted being stuck with Doug. Especially when Doug has him try to play a Doug character, gurning and wide eyed and weird. Malcolm deserves so much better.
@@shawnfoster4506 my own personal theory on this is Doug's using some manipulation tactics to get Malcom to stay by reminding him that CA got him his "career" (as much as being supporting characters in stale skits on a channel that's far past its prime could be considered a career, anyways), Doug and the CA crew would be lost without Malcom, Malcom owes it to them to stay there, etc. If Doug takes pride in running a business terribly, I'm sure he'd happily exploit his own employees' emotions in a desperate bid to keep them around.
the best summary of Doug and Rob's skills as film critics is their opinion on Spider-Verse alternating between animating different characters in 12 and 24fps - "I guess they ran out of money for animation or something".
@@oninaru This is the same man who looked at _The Wall's_ songs/scenes of the abusive 1950's British primary school, complete with images of elementary-aged schoolchildren, and assumed Roger Waters was complaining about how high school bites. And who called Waters's reflection on the trauma inflicted by WW2, and _The Wall_ accusing the Allies of following the same path the Axis had, a "World War 2 reference". Doug (and/or whoever else contributes to the criticism components of _Nostalgia Critic)_ is hidebound by a sort of literalism which works adequately for most crummy kid movies people feel a vague nostalgia for, but poorly for anything more ambitious than that. They also don't seem to give their first impressions a second thought, don't double-check it against the actual subject to make sure it fits.
If they’d been wise enough to stop the whole Mario routine at “Mario scares me. It’s time the rest of the world shared my fear.” it would have actually been an OK joke.
Yeah Doug indulges in jokes like that all the time, ones with a pretty funny if “easy” punchline, but then another character calls out the punchline for not making sense and then they just talk back and forth for the next minute while you’re waiting for a second punchline that never comes because the humor is in how awkward the interaction is and how dumb one of them is, Mario in this case.
It's the kind of joke that can be funny because it's random and out of left field, if a bit boring and low hanging, but as soon as you try to indulge in the joke it just loses its shock value and falls completely flat
The whole "lmao Mario jumps on turtles, that's so weird" thing is *so* played out in Internet culture. Like, it was a tired old joke in around 2008, let alone the time Demo Reel came out.
Honestly the Mario fakeout scene *could* have been funny if it had just been Alfred shaking his head in resignation instead of stretching it out for minutes
Something I’ve noticed across all of Doug’s projects is that he constantly calls his work “love letters”. That he’s so in love with movies and that all of his work is meant to showcase how great the medium can be. Yet it’s all so mean-spirited you can’t help but wonder if he even likes movies at all.
His Pink Floyd The Wall review is such a blazing example. Love it or hate it, it's a film that doesn't deserve the disrespect that Doug dumped on it. The lame and insulting parody songs wouldn't make anyone laugh or be entertained, no matter how much you hated the wall or how stupid your humor is. And the actual review at the end is "It was fine!" To justify the 40 minutes of constant torture. And then to rub salt in the wound, he decided to have a ROCK STAR sing the *SpongeBob SquarePants* theme song, because why not? I-I don't even know what audience it's made for...
@@vanroyal244 To be fair to Doug, Corey Taylor is somewhat known for playing the spongebob squarepants theme at solo concerts. He didn't conjure that idea out of nothing. To be unfair to Doug, it makes perfect sense that he didn't come up with the gag himself. th-cam.com/video/Q5OLtoY70AI/w-d-xo.html
He believes all humour is fundamentally mean, which in itself, is a defensible theory, he just never thought deeply about all the implications and edge cases... Like the affectionate parodies and how people can love both them and the works/genres parodied. So, he just decided adding "it's a love letter" is simply a polite thing people say to hide they're being mean, he never thought about how affectionate parodies really work.
Yeah, his "The Wall" review not only showed to his last 3 fans how big he misses the point of what he criticizes, but also how mean-spirited he is. Like when he made fun of Another Brick in The Wall p. II because to him the idea of showing school in such a bad light was ridiculous (even tho it was Waters' experience after WWII) and at the same time thinking that the scene was a reference to the Hollocaust when it was just simply representing a slaughterhouse.
I'm amused by the idea that Doug Walker, Rob Walker, and Mike Michaud are the only content creators on the internet so incompetent that they could make a series with no budget and still somehow end up in debt
Remember: They didn't just shoot this in someone's apartment's spare room, or in an empty office, or something. They rented (mediocre) studio space. They paid employees (I hope). They bought costumes. There is only so half you can ass these expenses, and Doug was trying to put his full ass into this production. Debt doesn't always come from racking up huge bills. Sometimes it comes from small bills combined with even smaller paychecks.
@@jeremyzak654 mainly because CA quite literally forgot that he is even a part of it, he never got invited to any crossover events outside of maybe one collab in the last decade, he mainly focused on youtube, never really mentions it.
I think, what makes the Jake Lloyd inclusion especially bad is that from what I can tell, *everyone* struggled to deliver George Lucas' dialogue. He doesn't seem to be especially good at directing actors. Lloyd was just doing the best he could and got hung out to dry as a symbol. Reducing it to "he was a bad actor lol" when he was *11* feels, at best, disingenuous. I dunno, maybe it's more thoughtless than anything.
Mark Hamill is famously quoted as saying "who talks like this, George?!" About his lines. Jake Lloyd was an easy scapegoat and deserves a massive apology
Yeah, when George managed to make even Samuel L "motherfucking" Jackson deliver an inhumanly bland performance, it's hard to blame any of the actors for the delivery they went with.
No it's because a bunch of man babies were mad and dunking on kids is something geeks, especially back then, thought was really funny and edgy. It wasn't thoughtless, they just didn't care.
Wasn't Doug Walker the same guy who criticized Captain Planet for not having the capability of tackling such a sensitive subject as AIDS? And now he thinks he's capable of tackling the issue of suicide?
He made a very similar criticism of M. Night Shyamalan with Split back in 2017, saying he was tackling an issue that he wasn't fit to tackle... So still not the most self-aware person. I will say, I do remember a recent joke where he said something about pretentious wannabe filmmakers or something and flashed images of a bunch of people on the screen in quick succession as examples, the last of which being a photo of himself from like 10 years ago, so maybe he's a bit more humble now?
I think the sketch with Batman dressing up as Mario was genuinely funny ... until he's ask why and attempts to explain it ... and in the process doesn't just completely drag the joke down into the mud, but also reveals he doesn't know what's potentially funny about his own joke.
Yeah I thought that as well while i was watching this, then as it began to drag and I thought "okay they're probably going to spend way too long on this" the text popped up on the screen saying "this scene goes on for two and a half minutes".
Honestly, this is a problem I have with a lot of modern humor, where a joke that's kinda funny gets dragged out and become completely unfunny. I think Family Guy does this a lot as well.
There's like two funny visual gags; 12:47 Donnie takes his glasses off, realizes he needs them to see, and puts them on again 18:08 Donnie trying on the Batman mask and his hat at the same time Aside from that, not much else.
He was one of the biggest creators on this site at one point. Back when youtube was audience driven. Long before the algorithm we all know and love came into being. You have no else to blame but yourselves ;)
Fun acting tidbit I noticed: Doug's "serious" acting between Demo Reel and The Review Must Go On are far different. In the former, it feels so scripted and the delivery feels like it's supposed to be resentful but not really convincing at all like Emily stated. But in the latter, there's a lower, slower vocal register and a reserved but darker undertone to Doug's acting that portrays his hesitancy surprisingly well. What I love about this is that in the latter, Doug's nightmare of becoming The Critic again IS what he's genuinely feeling, and so the experiences that create that frustration translate because that acting is coming from lived experience and emotions rather than a character. Make of that what you will.
It was a real “Say the line, Bart” moment for him. I believe that video was him killing Doug and allowing Critic to take full control. He surrendered to the thing he tried to outgrow
Doug Walker's humor has taken the exact same arc as Seth McFarland's. With both Family Guy and Nostalgic Critic, the jokes used to be FAST. They followed one after the other and were sharp and witty, and if one didn't work, it was over with quickly so it wasn't too painful. But then they started to be dominated by longer and longer cuttaway sketches that had nothing to do with anything and were filled with awkward anti-humor.
Also the fact Doug did not consider for even a moment that all the other content creators on his site might be hit hard by him surprise-cancelling the website's main draw shows how much he cares about other people.
He was arrogant and incompetent enough to think that he could just replace the nostalgia critic with demo reel and every fan would just stay and watch. I don't think you can call him a bad person for that however. Maybe he thought that demo reel would be even more successful because he had more passion to work on it than nostalgia critic, therefore the switch being good for everyone working for the site. He was delusional, sure, but negligent towards the other creators, doubt it.
@@ellipsoidi Oh you can call him bad for other reasons. Like voting to fire their HR person a day after her surgery, or knowing about Jew Wario's sinister side and doing nothing, or keeping as Producer a man who apparently repeatedly lewdly harassed content creators, or that time he burst out laughing when told his cast and crew of 40 ish people filming in the DESERT need water. Or him basically making people spend extra time while on set filming his anniversary movies to record crossovers to make CA even more ad revenue to make up for the fact they had to be given accomodations to sleep in while filming Doug's anniversary movies.
Everything I've seen seems to suggest it's less maliciousness and more that Doug's just a fucking idiot! He's beyond arrogant and doesn't even consider that the stuff he's doing might not be a good way to handle things. And from one perspective, I can kind-of understand? He's a big internet personality doing a weekly show, it makes sense that early on he'd get used to acting first and thinking later, and when that works you're going to get an ego from your fanbase over it. But this is so far after he dipped his toes into 'real' filmmaking, like....... Did he just think Demo Reel was going to be such a big success that it wouldn't matter? Or was he just so blinded by the idea of moving on that he never considered there'd be consequences for trying to drop his biggest project for something new? Because I can easily see both of these being true!
You're so right about the fact that part of the reason everything looks so shitty is because Doug never leans in to the fact that they have no budget. The movie Tangerine is shot exclusively on iphone 5s, and even though this was because of budget reasons, it also helps to create this intimate, fly-on-the-wall feeling and matches the gritty enviornment the characters live in. It makes the story better. Every time I see something Doug Walkers made it feels like he's trying to emmulate a big-budget production, and it just never works
Aren't like some of the mist cult-classic films made on a shield string budget? Blair witch, cloverfield I believe was, district 9, and I think chronicle was as well as many others
I mean, he's also just flat-out an inept filmmaker, so I don't think it matters what his budget is. Even if he had $10 million, it's highly unlikely he would make anything watchable.
@@danielshore1457 Only The Blair Witch Project had a low budget (between $200.000 and $750.000). The others you mentioned had something between $15 million and $35 million, which is not that low in comparison to what Blair or Doug Walker had
Ignoring Channel Awesome's scummy history as a company, what I think Doug needed for this series was a real crew. He needed to do what someone like Tomska (Thomas Ridgewell) does, and get directors and writing partners. He also needed to actually DO some filmmaking courses. Not necessarily film school for years, but a few workshops at the absolute minimum. The guy thinks to this day he and his friends can do it all themselves and it'll be great, but Doug's fundamentally untalented and incurious. He refuses to truly grow, yet insist to all he's getting better with every project. But with every vanity project crap he produced, his work reveals greater sloppiness, lack of self awareness, and shallowness.
Thing is, he had that opportunity. Lots of people involved with channel awesome studied filmmaking professionally. Lindsay Ellis has said that when she tried to offer him suggestions to improve the crossover movies, he would ignore her or brush it off.
@@marias-i3333 yeah that's what I mean. I cribbed a bit from Dan Olson there because he put it so eloquently; Douglas is fundamentally incurious. He doesn't want to hear how things can be done better. He's so arrogant that he thinks he already knows best. That which he does not know, he thinks he can learn on the job. But he's wrong, and his work is still bottom tier garbage.
thomas ridgewell is about as much of a narcissistic self absorbed egoist as doug walker is, the only difference between them is that thomas has a bit more natural talent and has managed to find a style that's relatively hard to replicate
@@richardvlasek2445 There's that, and the fact Ridgewell is aware of his faults and actively works to try to better himself. He fucks up, makes stupid mistakes and has alienated several friends, but he attempts to make amends and admit to his issues openly. He also doesn't insist that he's talented to everyone and doesn't try to do it all himself. The guy's admitted he's good at getting other, more talented folks around him to help work on the sketches. Finally, Ridgewell went to film school, did media studies and has a Uni degree. Walker doesn't have shit. He just makes it up as he goes along, which is fine for some, but Walker has no real talent at all, yet thinks he can do it without help.
@@marias-i3333 I have since learned that Doug actually did film school basically. He minored in film study at college. So he really is just incompetent and there is no getting better as a director for him because he just doesn't have it in him.
I’m so happy you brought up how much tv tropes simps for Doug Walker. There’s been points where I feel like some of the pages related to him are written BY him.
I mean there’s an entire page named after Big Lipped Alligator Moment. On the other hand, the Super Villain Shuffle is no longer listed as a moment of awesome lol
@@henrynelson9301 The best part is the explanation for why the Super Villain Shuffle was removed is, "The super villain shuffle song is forgotten for a reason: it sucks."
@@ironmaster6496 it was actually a week after the video came out. Like the other guy said, the person who removed it just said “The super villain shuffle song is forgotten for a reason: it sucks.”
A lot of the simping for Doug Walker came about in TVTropes pages during like early 2010s (hell Web Originals in trope pages tend to be filled with CA people and Doug Walker), nowadays a lot of the Doug Walker content/trope examples are a lot more curated and you'd rarely see people whole hog simping for him outside of old un-updated trope pages (i.e: The Awesome Moment part of Supervillain Shuffle before someone probably realized it shouldn't be there anymore and edited it out).
I'm completely obsessed with content about NC, because it was my first heartbreak in terms of being disappointed with something you admired. I got into NC as a grown ass woman when I was horribly depressed and those videos kept me company and made me happy when nothing else would, so when I heard about the change the channel movement, it was like I have been married for years and suddenly discovered my spouse have had a secret family this whole time. I felt like shit for WEEKS, I couldn't even hear about NC, but then it all became anger and would consume any midia talking shit about NC (I know it all sounds super dramatic but I was at such a low point in my life). Years later, I'm more chill about it, but still every time I see a new video on the subject, I revive everything and I can't look away. Amazing video!
Hey hey I also got into NC as a horribly depressed grown ass woman (well, 18, but still). Hate that for us! Even though the production quality was always garbage and in hindsight I can see the major glaring sexism/racism/etc. issues, it was a real comfort series. Maybe it was because of the poor production quality that it felt like having fun watching a friend’s video.
@@alluneedislessthan3 Same here too. I got into it when I was 28 and was constantly sick in bed. His videos were entertaining and helped me feel better when I was suffering because they made me laugh and really, at the time, there was nothing else like TGWTG (that was worth watching), besides AVGN. Our options and tastes have greatly widened over the past 13 years and Doug is still using the same shtick. It's depressing. It's also maddening most of the stuff they did to their associates, so that's just another layer of disappointment. I can't watch those videos that made me happy anymore because I know now what he would eventually become.
It's nice to know about other grown ass women who felt a similar way! I always felt so silly for having such strong feelings about the whole thing back then. Thank you guys for sharing your experience!
I was 16, but I found it late when it was far past its prime, I think like 'season' 9? I was very depressed, and found one of the videos that gave me a few simple chuckles, that then went deeper until I became an obsessive fan, at the beginning, I mixed old and new reviews, so probably why I didn't notice just how crappy the quality was. Was a fan till I was 18 when the change the channel popped up and I reacted almost exactly as you're describing here.
Okay this is going to come across as extremely strange and solipsistic and full of tangents, but I'm *so* glad you've made this video. The points you brought up at the very end about Doug's ambition and creative drive is something I've been thinking about lately as a former TGWTG devotee now nearing the age Doug was when the Critic's popularity and the online community were in full swing. He is so profoundly sad to me? This weird little cornerstone of my adolescence, someone who was - horrifyingly - an influence on my interests and humor, had some real passion and creative drive just like me, but was just kind of too foolish, too negligent to handle his position? I think about how he used to draw cartoons in some bits and even references his art in one of the Alice in Wonderland reviews (citing Tim Burton as an influence) and how he left all traces of that part of himself behind. I think about how he let the horrible treatment of employees and fans go unchecked, LITERAL ABUSE, likely because he wasn't affected by any of it, and he was living his dream. And it makes me feel so weird that because of his reviews I began to dig deeper into actual film criticism, schools of thought devoted to breaking down ways of interpreting text and subtext and symbolism, authorial intent (and the death thereof), and from there began to explore social issues in order to better understand others. Art is interpretation and Good Art asks you to engage meaningfully in that way and to try to empathize with its subjects. All those hours I spent reading theory (at risk of sounding like that Rick & Morty copypasta, I know I'm a huge nerd who needs to touch more grass), learning to listen to and understand voices different from myself (a dumb teenager) were springboarded by this miserable, little screaming goblin man I found funny when I was 16, whose community turned on him and killed his dream, possibly even being his divine punishment for the treatment of those who trusted him? Something something your idols are but men in flesh and thus fallible creatures, idk. I have had some altering substances and got kind of emotional because it felt nice to know someone else wasted precious time philosophizing about the fucking Nostalgia Critic.
Some of the least-meaningful things out there can be surprisingly good insights into culture, history, even people in general. There's less self-awareness and so people don't know what they're revealing about themselves. It's the whole joke in Garth Mahrenghi's Darkplace but this time for real this is who this guy truly is.
@@BiggestCorvid Oddly enough, I think Quinton Reviews videos can be very... Mean on their topics. Like a certain disdain that I felt from him when he talked about Doug Walker and specially Linkara. But that may be just me.
I'm totally with you. Do you remember him mentioning being in Forbes at one point? I don't wanna mythologize, especially when other voices need to be raised in history, but as a historical narrative, you're right. It's tragic and fascinating.
@@iankernohan3874 "this guy is somehow revolutionizing an industry and breaking all the rules," almost inevitably ends in, "the leader, hailed as visionary, harassed and intimidated people while violating labor laws and civil rights."
The Evangelion analogy is actually even more revealing, because Eva, like.../isn't/ a deconstruction of the mecha genre. Mecha has known putting kids in war machines is bad since the start, that's what OG Gundam is /about/. Anno made what was both a new spin on the genre and true to its existing strengths. Walker is, like, the polar opposite of that. "Movies are bad, and I'm smarter than them!"
I'd like to point out that just because X is addressed in a foundational work of a genre doesn't mean that X played straight can't become a staple of that genre. Genre-defining works tend to be thoughtful (because you need to be good on _some_ level to inspire a whole genre, and that generally requires thoughtfulness), but genre fiction tends to include a lot of thoughtless crap.
It can even happen to individual series, not just genres. Rocky and Rambo were both pretty dark character portraits, but the sequels just leaned straight into fun movie violence.
I don't think Gundam is really the kind of show Evangelion is subverting - it seems more in line with a twist on the "Super Robot" subgenre of mech anime like Mazinger Z. Both Evangelion and Gundam are deconstructions of that in different ways, with Gundam recasting superhero-like mechs as more grounded weapons in a serious war drama, while Evangelion directly flips Super Robot elements (alien enemies as monsters of the week, the abandoned child who becomes humanity's last hope, the seeming sentience of the mechs, the hot-blooded rival, etc.) into a sometimes lovecraftian psychodrama. Whether or not other series had already deconstructed the Super Robot genre and become more dominant in our view of mech anime (as Gundam certainly did), I think Evangelion still functions as a response to those earlier Super Robot shows. Demo Reel was still bad though, no argument there.
@@drpibisback7680 I think my issue with people saying this is really that it's always people who have little to no familiarity with mecha anime throwing out these claims of "subversion" to a genre they don't actually even know but automatically dismiss. The statement "unlike most mecha anime, this one focuses more on the human aspect rather than the big robots" is kind of a meme in the mecha community because it makes eyes roll. There's this sort of obsession with "subversion"/"deconstruction" within western anime fans that Japanese people just don't really care about and don't even really see/intend, and in the case of mecha anime, it ends up feeling like there's a condescending attitude towards mecha anime. Like you get the feeling that in their subconscious, they're thinking "Evangelion is good, but that's specifically because it's unlike the other childish mecha anime I would never watch!". Of course, people familiar with the genre understand that there isn't really all that much "subversion" or "deconstruction", it's just a different flavour of the same genre, with many of the aspects always having been present anyway. Some fans even dismiss the concept of "real robot" because it isn't really that significant: Yoshiyuki Tomino didn't create "real robot" to stand out or subvert anything, it was simply a different type of mecha. And just like Doug Walker shows here, you can't create with cynicism and distaste: Tomino also made super robots before that with just as much passion. And guess what, some of those were really dark. But this also gets to another point: real robot/super robot doesn't influence tone or subject matter either, another reason why some mecha fans don't really care about the differentiation. This means that the only difference between real robot and super robot is that... I guess the real robot is slightly more realistic. Really, thinking about it this way makes it tough to find a concrete difference between the two. It's not even like real robots are realistic, they're just A BIT more realistic, because they STILL don't make any sense. And fans of mechas like the "two types" of robots for the exact same reason: seeing a cool big robot move and use cool attacks is fun. But in terms of subject matter and tone, there's nothing concretely differentiating the two. You can have a lighthearted "real robot" series as well as a dark and traumatic "super robot" series showing the children piloting the robots getting broken by it, that's not a concept invented or even popularised by Evangelion. And that's fine because Evangelion, unlike popular western interpretation, was not really particularly trying to be subversive, and even if it was, honestly, what a fucking boring idea! That would suck! Why are western fans so obsessed over feeling smart cause their show is "subversive"? It's not smart, it's trite as hell. It's literally the Doug Walker attitude we're meant to be making fun of here, "Movies are bad, and I'm smarter than them!" while understanding nothing. Being really cynical while being uneducated while looking for a reason to feel smart. Just enjoy the damn show, it being a mecha anime isn't a blight that must always be followed by a disclaimer that it's not like the other mecha shows. Yes, it is like the other mecha shows. Sorry if I sound like I'm yelling at you, I'm not pissed at you specifically or anything. It's just the thought of Evangelion fans and western audiences' obsession with subversion that gets me riled up for some reason. It really is funny that an Evangelion analogy was chosen for this video because it perfectly analogues Doug Walker's unwarranted cynicism towards movies.
According to the Not So Awesome document, Phelan Porteous joked about Demo Reel on his twitter (specifically in saying that there would be a big reveal in his web series that he was actually Sub-Zero) and he was asked to personally apologize to Doug Walker. If that doesn't speak volumes concerning Doug's ego, nothing will.
To be fair, wasn’t it that Mike Machaud (or whatever his name is) guy who generally has a massive history in the document of... just being a weirdo and douchenozzle in general? I’m not suggesting Doug doesn’t have his own garbage he needs to own up to, but if I recall correctly, I don’t think it was Doug who specifically asked Phelan to apologize to him. If anything, wasn’t Doug confused on that whole situation? Correct me if I’m wrong on any of this. I haven’t read/listened to the document in a while.
@@keybyss98 IIRC The document only stated that Phelan was asked to apologize to Doug, it could have been on the behest of Michaud or even Robert Walker, but I do not recall if either of those were in the document.
@@keybyss98 Yeah, Douchebag gets all the blame just cause he's the face of the channel, but others such as Robin hood and Mike Ike are also responsible.
@@keybyss98 In the document Doug just seems negligent, off in his own world and completely oblivious to what his colleagues were thinking and feeling, to the point where it sometimes comes across like he's deliberately keeping himself ignorant of those things, all of which is kind of inexcusable if you're ostensibly the face of the company and very close to the top of the organisation. Also the whole "cover up the fact that a former staff member is a sex offender and even make a loving video tribute to them despite knowing full well what they did" thing.
"His idea of jokes a lot of time are just to have characters make pop culture references..." Sounds like he would make a great writer for _Family Guy._
The difference is that Family Guy never claimed to be a review show or be taken too seriously. When it wants to be taken seriously, it stops with the references.
Tbh I think it’s unfair on Family Guy to compare it to something like the NC. Family Guy, especially modern Family Guy (although even the pre-cancellation seasons were hit and miss and best), is undeniably awful, but NC, taken as a “series” fails on a level so basic I don’t think there’s even a word for what it doesn’t manage to achieve since a piece of media achieving it is so fundamentally expected. Idk really even how to word this so my comment is probably confusing but hopefully you at least FEEL what I mean even if you can’t quite get what it is.
@@zoewells3160 I don't think his content was a failure at all until he quit the NC the first time. He helped pioneer the genre. Sure, most people grew out of liking his content and his content more or less evolved in a worse direction but I also think people give him way too much shit for attempting to change his format. Frankly, some of his early NC episodes after Demo Reel were genuinely some of his best stuff. That's not saying a ton, but you can tell his jokes had some development. Family Guy is barely any better than a show like Nostalgia Critic. It's reference based humor, it appeals to people up to a point and then becomes incredibly annoying. That's why Family Guy used to be cherished by so many and is now hated. I don't see Doug Walker's shows having any worse or different an arc than 99% of TV shows that were successful. They started out fresh, grew stale and eventually the characters aren't remotely the same as what the show started with and everyone who loved the show initially begins to hate the changes and moves on. People just don't want to move on from Nostalgia Critic's old content, that's what I believe anyway. I don't like his new content but I don't go to every one of his videos and tell everyone he needs to change shit for ME. Yet to some degree, you have people who successfully keep up their show longer than anyone else. AVGN is a fair comparison for that, he's still going, at a slower pace, but most people still love his newer content as much as his older stuff. I think his new stuff is a lot better, personally. But you'll still find people who say he's too politically correct or some other bullshit that they don't like and feel he should go back to doing to please them individually. I'm just saying Doug Walker, Nostalgia Critic, whatever you want to call him, is not unique and is no worse than a lot of TV shows and internet creators. Spongebob, Aqua Teen Hunger Force, Family Guy are all a few examples of shows I can think of that I adored early on and hated their later content. Very few shows can maintain consistency in both characters and tone, as well as narrative. I can think of Futurama as one where the main cast is mostly the same in the later seasons as in the early seasons. That's why a lot of shows need to die eventually, that's why Nostalgia Critic probably should have died and ended. Now he's so out of ideas, his content is awful.
Doug's incompetency on filmmaking is even surpassed by his cheapskatery. He bought the most affordable LED lights for his "dream show" resulting in horrible horizontal banding in those talking head setups. His goto background is a white wall and his mortal enemy is a window behind his subject at noon. Also, after almost 20 years of filming, he and his team are yet to comprehend the concept of the 180° rule, something so basic that any entry level youtube video about cinematography most certainly covers it.
I have NO filmmaking background and only the barest hint of a theater background (and only as a performer). I had never, ever heard of a "180 rule" until literally the day I read the CTC document. But goddamn, after only a few minutes of thinking about it and firing up a TH-cam video for further explanation, I got it. It seems like people have been trying to drill the concept into Doug's head for years and he's just unable or unwilling to even entertain the concept.
The production value of his content is so poor and its inexcusable to be honest. Cheapskate was a very accurate description of it. He's been making content for so long yet the lighting is still so bad, it's baffling.
@@user-jb7tq7ko7e Doug has committed the cardinal sin of artistry: complacency. He's 100% convinced that because his amateur filming and MS paint effects were successful in the early 2000s he doesn't need to improve them in any way. The only way he's really grown and changed as an artist over the years now is his increasingly parody-focused style, which is more borne of his desire to be a filmmaker and not a critic (but being unable to actually make anything decent) than him actually attempting to improve on the nostalgia critic.
ah yes, the gremlins in the comments love to criticize doug's film making when they don't understand anything about film making. you're just copying and pasting someone else's unoriginal comment at this point just to justify your hatred of doug walker. maybe you should get a life
@@garretdrake2347 I don't know about the other "gremlins" but I am a filmmaker and have been working in productions for the last 15 years as DOP, cinematographer and editor. I'm not copy pasting anything, I'm not as lazy as Doug.
It's such a small thing in a sea of others, but seeing the faux-SWAT guy try to threateningly cock his handgun at 51:15, only for it to hold open on an empty magazine, demonstrating that the gun is definitely unloaded and clear is *chef's kiss*
What I think really makes the Elizabeth Huffman and Jake Lloyd thing even more despicable is that Doug's character is so obviously supposed to be a stand in for himself. Doug has always had this persecuted artist complex where he believes that any criticism of his work is a persecution of him. In doing this, he is equating two very real life tragedies, one of which involved a suicide, to his situation as a terrible online creator who refuses to put in the most bare minimum of effort into his craft.
@@TheLowBrassDude him and tj kirk both do that,if you criticize and you make your fame off of it, then its very hypocritical for them to say "how dare you criticize me?" when its done to you....as the narrator said, just doing insulting and "edgy" jokes doesnt make it funny...like u can make jokes without making fun of someone, many shows ...i think doug is a edgelord jokester type of guy...that type of comedy can be good if there's a punchline, george carlin is a good example of edgy comedy with a purpose, hes pointing out flaws of society while hes cracking jokes so you not only laugh but you acknowledge hes saying the truth.... what doug and many comedies do is crude humor just to be crude and its very lazy and its been getting called out
29:33 "They decide to feed Rebecca Sugar" Yeah that line confused me because I already for got the characters' names and thought we were talking about the creator of Steven Universe now
I'd feel more sorry for Walker if he wasn't so complicit in the Change The Channel controversy. He's the sad clown wallowing in a purgatory created by his own hubris, but whatever pity I can muster for the guy is overwhelmed by a grander sense of mocking contempt and thinking his current position as a form of karma more than anything else.
@@garretdrake2347 despite him not doing anything wrong, he also Did Nothing when it came to the abuse at the hands of his coworkers, especially since he had the power to put his foot down. So, he did do something wrong by doing nothing and sometimes that can be pretty bad.
Doug Walker's humor is literally like those awful spoof movies from the late 2000's like Epic Movie. It's pop culture references for the sake of pop culture references. Like the Randy Newman "joke" is a reference to an old Family Guy joke, itself a pop culture reference. I believe there was a quote from the "Not So Awesome" document that stated something to the effect of that all of Doug's jokes were just pop culture references because he thought just the references in themselves were funny, even though they weren't really jokes.
It’s especially disappointing because of how he previously critiqued these kinds of parodies, which are mostly made up of references. th-cam.com/video/dj3ZOF6A3MM/w-d-xo.html I really dislike when he reviews a movie that is only I theatres and the whole video is just like a long version of Demo Reel.
Here Ill finish the Arby's joke for him. "Wait stop, we cant go in there!" "What is it, guards? Traps? Did you get food poisoning once? A really mean sign that says keep out???" "No, worse. We havent purchased film rights for the location yet." and scene, leaving plenty of room for their villains to develop a little and for the deli fresh stakes to be raised.
The great thing about Doug Walker is how holistically awful everything is. From a still frame you can tell how awful the colors and lighting are. With the audio muted you can tell the pacing is terrible and everybody's body language is discordant and identical. The actors' facial expressions in isolation are dreadful, especially Doug's default empty-eyed rictus grin. I haven't visited the channel in years but I wouldn't be surprised if the video descriptions were also awful in a way which fractally reflected the awfulness of these other elements. From one frame he gives you a holistic understanding of how bad the writing and tone must be. And they are! Doug is a case study in wrongheadedness and mediocrity, and he leaves no stone turned.
This is something I noticed while putting the video together, yeah. Like it was so hard to edit clips to use because so much of Demo Reel is just... very very same-y shots, for scenes that are mostly overwritten dialogue and prolonged jokes, and it becomes clear how little he's actually using the visual medium and its properties for his benefit. It's bizarre. You even just begin to notice the difference in audio quality going from his (presumably) on-camera mic footage vs any sort of voice over or content you edit against it. Weird.
@@LadyEmilyPresents Yeah, I kept thinking about you having to pore over this stuff and come up with meaningful commentary, and every time you'd say "Ok, here's something I didn't want to bring up, but now I have to," I'd think "Geez how deep did she go into this rabbit-hole? Did she come back the same?" Never has more blood been wrung from a smaller stone. I don't mean to rag on Doug for his failures of perspective and talent, even though they ultimately combine into something that makes me viscerally uncomfortable in a way few things do. I don't expect him to say, go work at a tire place or something. I guess it's like you say, the NC is a prison of his own making, and really I just feel pity for him, and especially for the actors he hires. Him trying to break out into narrative filmmaking is like when an okapi breaks out of their zoo enclosure thinking there's somewhere for them to go. Anyway, thanks for remembering it so we didn't have to.
@@LadyEmilyPresents Some more thoughts by my part as I keep on coming back to this, the underlying problem is Doug Walkers content in TH-cam terms is not unlike when you stumble across a twenty year old HTML website that is still being maintained to this day...in other words painfully dated and too much effort to scroll through! For someone who became a major TH-cam content provider the quality of his material from camera to sound through effects is little better than what we saw in the early years of TH-cam, there are smaller content providers who produce content that is vastly superior production quality wise and some have moved onto bigger things. The tools to make high quality content are there for us all yet Doug appears to be totally uninterested in upping his game. Even worse we know Channel Awesome has sunk money on expensive kit yet you wouldn't know watching what they produce which feels slapdash and rushed but as you say not in a charming way. Yet Doug and his crew swan about as if they are somehow modern day Stanley Kubrick producing high quality content in the insufferable lengthy behind the scenes videos they produce for all their content as if they are somehow showing major craft in what they are doing. Compare Channel Awesome to something like Viva La Dirt League or The Corridor Crew to see what can be done in a professional manner on a limited budget.
@@Fedaykin24 you summed it up pretty well. I thought about Captain Dissilusion and how he also uses greenscreens and aftereffects (or something similar) a lot. But one can tell that he puts in some serious efforts to make it look as good as possible. How can channel awesome use these techniques for so long and not get any better at it?
“The Channel Awesome Trilogy and Doug Walker as a person was never really great as we remembered” is my favorite sub genre of TH-cam videos. This and Oneyplays running gag of ripping on him. It feels like therapy for those who were once a fan of Nostalgia Critic back in the day. It’s almost like the aftermath of escaping from a cult.
The Oneyplays bits about him are literally why I started watching Oneyplays after not watching Let's Plays for like a decade since JonTron left Game Grumps 😅
"Since I basically lived off of these when I was eleven, trying to critique them is like going back to a Cartoon Network series you used to watch when you were nine." I guess you could say it's difficult to critique because of your nostalgia. That you're a critic... with nostalgia.... a notalgic...... critic.......... okay I'll stop
There is some...Odd irony to that, really. The Nostalgia Critic is a show all about how things you liked as a kid often turn out to be kinda bad when viewed as an adult...And, now, the Nostalgia Critic, for lots of people IS something we liked as kids that turned out to be kinda bad when watched as an adult.
one thing that really made me uncomfortable during the demo reel finale is the appropriation of Jake Lloyd's story to make Doug's self insert more sympathetic. While the appropriated hartman backstory involves a more tragic overall real world occurance due to ending in her death, doug is, at least, not a part of that but doug is, in no small part, a contributor to the continued online harrassment Lloyd suffered. a large one. mocking him being a frequent thing on the early nostalgia critic and was something doug almost encouraged in the fandom. for lloyd daring to be an actor cast in a bad movie. and then doug snaps up this persons real story... to cast himself as the standin for the person he contributed to the sitation for. its just... its just skeezy, and uncomfortable, and it makes doug seem like someone who doesnt think about anyone but themselves, because even if you now regret those actions, using this real persons harrassment as a basis for why you need sympathy, despite being part of the harrassment, is just ugh
Jake Lloyd was at Columbia College Chicago at around the same time Malcolm Ray was there, which makes me wonder if the ONLY REASON AT ALL that it occurred to Doug that Jake Lloyd was maybe mistreated by the media (including his own videos) was that Malcolm maybe mentioned it to him after they started working together. Because Doug comes across as such a self-absorbed person that I don't think he's capable of having an empathetic thought unless somebody else suggests that he have it.
Honestly, the "joker make up as whiteface" bit could have been really funny. Taxis stop for him when he's in the make up. Police don't bother him. He contemplates just wearing the joker make up for the rest of his life, I dunno. It's the seed of a joke
@@lanceturley7745 I mean yeah it's not a totally original joke but it would be different enough because this isn't "black man dressed as a white man" it's "Joker face make up is enough to enable white privilege." It's ridiculous enough to be different even if not entirely unique.
@@SteveRudzinski Okay, yeah. When you describe it that way, as "the not at all convincing Joker makeup is somehow still enough to get people to treat him better," that actually is a funny idea.
I cant stop thinking about the “Mario Scares me” joke and how it can be a potentially funny joke a la The Batman Lego movie style where Bruce is scared of Mario, not because of the video game but because Bruce saw the Anti Drug Mario PSA a tad too young and its plagued him since. I like to believe that Alfred would have to question him once and Bruce, all steely would go “Ill make them go to Hell before they die.” And Alfred would go, “Yes, Master Bruce.” But would give him a “would you like to talk about it” look and Bruce would promptly go “I’ll go change.” After like a beat or two of silence.
i’ve never watched a video by channel awesome and i only know of doug walker and the nostalgia critic very vaguely, but i’m still willing to watch two hours of people talking about them because it’s so entertaining lmao
@@joselocalau123 This saves you far more time and energy because I've tried and it's crazy, I was there for things like ask a ninja and freddyw's stuff etc etc, stick figures on crack lol It's amazing how much content creators have evolved and some havent
It's worth noting that around 2007, Doug uploaded a video where he quit his at-the-time hell job working as a custodian and made a big show out of it, as if he was done being held down by dull/uninteresting jobs that didn't go anywhere. Funny how things come full circle.
@@jekblom123Michael Bay had some winners. You tell me you weren't thoroughly entertained with Nicolas Cage pairing up with Sean Connery. Or Will Smith teaming up with Martin Lawrence.
Man, I used to be a big fan of Critic during the time when he killed the Critic and started demo reel. I am Russian who was mostly watching videos with subtitles, and my English was not very good, but I tried to watch Demo Reel anyway. It was so bad that I thought that it was my fault for not getting it. I thought, I probably don't get it because I don't know English well enough. But nope, it really was that bad
@Deniz Metin T. There weren't. People used to reupload them with subtitles in different languages. It was cool for those who didn't grasp English all that well, but CA creators were usually very against this, claiming they were taking revenue away from them.
The backstory of the last episode is the equivalent of Elisa Lam being used in YIIK as a character. Both are used purely plot devices to make you feel bad for the main character without handling the real life tragedy with any respect
YIIK was definitely going through my head while writing that section. It’s so off-putting to blatantly pull from specific personal tragedies like that, especially when it’s not the main focus of the work itself.
@@jay-white YIIK is an RPG released a while back that was mired in a variety of controversies. The biggest of which was that it featured a character who was clearly inspired by the real life person Elisa Lam, who was only in the story to give the main character motivation to go on the game’s adventure. If you hadn’t heard of it, it’s worth looking into the discourse around it... YIIK is a fascinating black hole to get sucked into, so long as you don’t make the mistake I did, and actually try to play it. Edit: Lam. Thanks autocorrect
As a former NC fan, the rise and fall of Doug Walker, from movie critic to “the worst filmmaker of his generation” is fascinating. It’s almost karmic. Anyway, loved this video. A bit of constructive criticism, there were times when the narration was too fast, and I had to rewind to understand what was said. Other than that, great. The NGE reference was perfect.
I used to think Nostalgia Critic was just a character that kinda worked in the early days of TH-cam and only stuck around because Doug didn't have any other successful ideas. I didn't realize it was THIS bad. The fact that nearly ten years has passed since Demo Reel and Doug still hasn't been able to move on from this character is just depressing
"This does get complicated when Donnie fucks Egoraptor from Game Grumps..." This line of summary alone begs several questions. Also, I literally spat tea on my floor and am holding Doug Walker personally liable.
Wow. I didn't make it past the first episode, but Dupree's backstory in the LAST episode? Really, Mr. Walker? As flawed as the animated Titanic trilogy was, you pointed out that its biggest cardinal sin was its mockery of the deaths of all the people who went down with the ship... And THIS is how you address these issues with these actors? Poor taste, man. That closing monologue about 'The Nostalgia Critic' being Walker's purgatory... Whew... Masterful.
I think that one of the central things about pre-reboot Nostalgia Critic is that it had its niche: Children's movies from the 80s and 90s that most of us who were around Doug's age or slightly older or younger might remember vaguely and have a weird curiosity about not shared by the rest of society, but realized they were kinda dumb and didn't mind seeing someone getting really angry at them while trying to recount their plots. Also they weren't run into the ground yet. (Yup, I watched that old German Columbus movie back in the day, but no one until Doug was talking about it). This made his stuff come off as more groundbreaking because it was original observations, by the very nature that it had to be because no one else was talking about the relevant films as compared to the Nolan Batman films which College Humor had already picked apart.
It's even in the name. So much media gets made, and a lot of it gets forgotten. That's always the case, but in the case of children's media you've got lots of stuff kids will see at a young & impressionable age and have burned into their brains that then just gets... forgotten. I'm pretty sure that I saw a film in theatres as a child called "Help I'm a Fish" but I haven't seen or heard it referenced anywhere in the world since that day. Was it even real? I guess I could look it up, but "how long can I continue to live my life until someone spontaneously confirms or denies the existence of 'Help I'm a Fish'" is just a game I'm playing with myself now. There's a niche out there for a "nostalgia critic" that does retrospectives like that! It's interesting to see reviewers go back & dissect old media you absorbed before you were old enough to be media-literate, and break them apart like Gordon Ramsey with a fork.
I appreciate the boldness of comparing Evangelion to literally anything associated with the Nostalgia Critic. But from the way you describe Demo Reel, it seems like a better comparison is to Moral Orel on Adult Swim. The start of Orel was a crass, early South Park-esque simple satire of Evangelical Christianity and 50s Leave It to Beaver Americana where every episode was basically same joke of "look how hypocritical Christians are!" But over the course of the series, there is a marked shift away from that one-note structure and towards looking more deeply at character's backstories, interconnections with others, and the arcs of their lives. By the end, it's a shockingly intense and nuanced psychodrama based around the quiet desperation and unspoken darkness at the heart of American small town life, to the point where they deliberately bring back the structure of the early episodes just to hammer home how that violent absurdity is not only now totally out of place, but actually the cause of immense trauma for everyone involved. This is, of course, a fucking insane evolution. The fact that it didn't completely collapse into a tonedeaf mess is itself a testament to masterful writing and such intricate pacing that even a single episode out of place can destroy the whole thing (which Adult Swim actually did, greatly hobbling its effect for most viewers). Needless to say, it was a narrow creative tightrope and required a whole team of writers and directors to pull off. The idea that Doug Fucking Walker thought he could thread the needle of "goofy comedy turns into serious character drama and social commentary" by himself as his first genuine narrative outing is a better joke than anything he could ever write himself.
It's honestly fascinating going back to Doug Walker, a fixture in my teenage years, and seeing just how weirdly bad his stuff was. It's not even like going back to an old show I loved as a kid, cause I tend to just not like those (or realize I wasn't smart enough to realize just how great it was when I first watched it) because his stuff, for as bad as it was, is pretty formative to me. Without Nostalgia Critic, I wouldn't have found creators like Super Eyepatch Wolf, Clemps, or Lady Emily and I probably wouldn't have started writing my own analytical essays. This is such a great deep dive on one of his more notorious projects because it doesn't just go "Ha, internet man not know what he's doing" but tries to understand why he made the decisions he did and what the show says about his worldview. This is honestly inspiring as a first effort.
I think Doug did so well because he was the only person who put out videos on a consistent basis, that touched on fairly basic media analysis. If you were a teenager with an interest in film and narrative, for a good few years Doug was really the main draw. Even Lindsay's early work is similarly basic with a chaotic upload schedule. Doug won out as the default through consistency and the sheer amount of content. Its no a coincidence to me that once video essayists became established and began making consistent high quality film content, Doug's viewing figures have never recovered.
If you want something like Demo Reel but actually good:
Show People. ( 1928 )
Movie Crazy. ( 1932 )
The Bad and The Beautiful. ( 1952 )
8 1/2. ( 1963 )
Contempt. ( 1964 )
Day for Night. ( 1973 )
F for Fake. ( 1973 )
Any Mel Brooks movie.
The other side of the wind.
Real Life. ( 1979 )
Camera Buff. ( 1979 )
Stardust Memories. ( 1980 )
The Stunt Man. ( 1980 )
Cinema Paradiso. ( 1988 )
UHF. ( 1989 )
The Quinch Tree Sun. ( 1992 )
Visions of light. ( 1992 )
The Player. ( 1992 )
Ed Wood. ( 1994 )
Living in Oblivion. ( 1995 )
Deconstructing Harry. ( 1997 )
Bowfinger. ( 1999 )
Being John Malcovich. ( 1999 )
American Movie. ( 1999 )
Mulholland Drive. ( 2001
Millenium Actress. ( 2001 )
Adaptation. ( 2002 )
Synecdoche New York. ( 2008 )
Be kind rewind ( obviously ). ( 2008 )
The Disaster Artist. ( 2017 )
I’m pinning this comment because there’s some really really good recommendations here, particularly Day for Night, American Movie, Ed Wood, and Synecdoche, New York
@@LadyEmilyPresents ) O.O thank you!
A few more I forgot to mention ( I don't want to edit the original comment ).
Persona. ( 1966 )
The Artist. ( 2011 )
Hugo. ( 2011 )
Birdman. ( 2014 )
Kentucky Fried Movie (1977)
In terms of scenes like Rebecca just conversing and blurring the lines between reality and fiction, check out John Cassavetes' movies
You know, when Dan Olson said Doug’s humor was “what if Batman met Mario”, I thought that was hyperbole. I forgot that there actually was a scene where Bruce Wayne references Mario Mario.
There is no hyperbole with Dan Olsen, you done have learned.
The thing is, the joke could have been decent if done right, but as always Doug had to stretch the joke out for way, way too long and he had to slam the viewer over the head with the punchline.
Mario's last name is not Mario, man. What gives?
@@muruamd yes it is what are you on about
@@muruamd isn't his full name Mario Jumpman Mario
The phrase "they decide to feed Rebecca sugar" was completely misparced in my head
I was so confused, like... They got who on this show?!
It's like an unintentional garden path sentence.
Ah yeah.... Cause Rebecca Sugar is a person.
Later she said she was on an “Anton sugar rush.”
She knows what she did.
phew. i was hoping it wasn't just me
Doug Walker's content was usually about criticizing movies that you liked as a kid but disliked as you got older, and now people are criticizing Doug Walker's content, even though they liked it when they were younger. It's incredibly poetic, honestly
It is. But the whole workplace attitude, suicides and rape aligations did their part too I guess.
@@SupremeCommanderBaiser rape? suicide? where did you read that?? i heard about the bad (horrible) workplace attitude that was/is channel awesome, but never rape or suicide
@@jormungandr3593 I am mostly refering to Jew Wario (suicide and predator aligations) and the freak Noah Antweiler (Spoony).
People grew up and Doug Walker did not.
"It is like poetry. It ryhmes." -Some guy idk
"...Doug's attempts to handle the topics of sexism and racism."
At this moment, I actually said "oh god" out loud.
A rare moment of good decision making from Doug to shelf that episode
Except that he still released it later but whatever
Multiple times while watching this video I said out loud “What the fuck Doug?”
The thing this kept reminding me of was the quote
"Doug wants to be a filmmaker, he wants to make art, but he can't. Because he is a fundamentally incurious person who isn't much interested in how other people think or feel. All of his ideas boil down to 'what if Batman met Mario'." -Dan Olson
about every 10 minutes throughout this video.
He’s a better critic then a film maker, but I think he knows that. Because his new content he pokes at himself about it.
When Dan said that, I stopped short to process the accuracy and the intensity of that burn. Will forever be relevant to discussions of Doug.
Hey BTW! As far that Mario Met Batman sketch Doug was doing in Demo Reel's first episode is concerned!
It get's even worse when you stop and realize that Doug is actively explaining to his audience why Bruce Wayne is dressing up as Mario! Thinking his auideince!
To put it bluntly!!
Doug is explaining the entire joke!!!!
th-cam.com/video/DOP-2ulq2bk/w-d-xo.html
@@jwood8769 not really all his criticisms are wow you did not hold my hand or this is dumb I'm smart
@@nate567987 that’s fair. He can be like that. Most the time
I swear, Doug Walker is starting to sound like a Greek tragedy for the internet age.
A man who quit his soul crushing job to become an internet celebrity with dozens of collaborators for an up and coming website who's job has become as, if not more, soul crushing than his previous job. Who's negligence, narcissism, hubris, and just stupid decisions led to all his colleagues leaving him behind. And is now just a foot note of the internet, who only ever gets brought up when looking back on his bad stuff back then, really REALLY bad stuff now, and #ChangeTheChannel. Stuck doing the very job he tried to escape from.
His life could make for a compelling movie, actually.
@@frankreads8618 I could see someone like David Fincher do a story about someone like Doug Walker. Fincher has done a lot of interesting character study films like Fight Club, Social Network, Gone Girl. He could definitely make a compelling story of an artist that's so caught up in his vision, he can't see that he's making a big pile of crap.
I would hardly call someone who can, on a week by week basis, gather anywhere from 300 thousands to 800 thousands views on his videos a "foot note of the internet"
@@TheTrainFan9 "He could definitely make a compelling story of an artist that's so caught up in his vision, he can't see that he's making a big pile of crap."
That sounds more like Mr. Enter trying to get his own cartoon made.
@@starofjustice1 He did? The guy that acted like Teen Titans Go was the most disrespectful thing on planet earth and up until a few years ago was still editing in Windows Movie Maker?
That guy tried to get a cartoon made about him?
The egos of some people, I swear.
33:38 He did not! I know this because my friends and I are in this episode, entirely without our knowledge! Although it turned out to be extremely hilarious because my friend was literally cosplaying /as/ the Nostalgia Critic. Doug (in character, I now know) asked who she was dressed as and I snark something about her being "some weird homeless guy", I think.
Saying that to his face with him not being able to react because he’s in character is so funny to imagine
I love how the major plot twist of the series (that would've undoubtedly taken far longer to pay off had things gone to plan) was that Doug's character was a horrifically bullied child actor. That it was supposed to be an apology for the disgusting treatment of Jake Lloyd over the years that led to his mental issues, and on a greater scale, an apology to all child actors that dealt with trauma from being exploited at such a young age.
And the *very first scene* in the series is mocking the then 9-year-old Haley Joel Osment's line delivery in The Sixth Sense.
I love how he had this whole plot about treating child actors better and in his smurfs review he literally said "every time this kid talks cancer gets stronger" like wtf
@@raijinslider6837 the irony is that the aforementioned kid is a younger Jacob Tremblay, who’d go on to have an acclaimed career as a child actor in movies like Room, Wonder, Pixar’s Luca and Doctor Sleep.
Would it have gone the same way had the mockery been on Jake Lloyd levels instead of “internet reviewer no one cares for” level?
@@ChildrenOfOwls yeah kids think he is funny
@@ChildrenOfOwls yes sir
A smarter or more experienced filmmaker could have made that into a satisfying bookend. But Doug is neither smart enough nor experienced enough despite ostensibly being a "filmmaker" for over a decade at this point
If the Mario joke had ended at "it's time the rest of the world shared my fear", it actually could've gotten a decent laugh. Walker has a real problem with overwriting.
He doesn’t even understand what’s funny about the joke he wrote
Wow, this is so right
Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog: No one is laughing, and the frog dies.
Which is funny, because I think I remember Doug saying that MadTV was better than SNL, because SNL dragged out the skits too long.
The white face/joker makeup joke got a chuckle out of me, but they held on it way too long.
Should've cut before getting a response. The funny part was him asking/the way he asked, the response just made it awkward.
I never watched Demo Reel myself, but I was friends on Tumblr with at least one person who did and from seeing them, I think it was a bit like BBC Sherlock in that they loved what they could make of the show rather than what it actually was. If you take away the kinda offensive real-world origins of Donnie's backstory, play Rebecca's straight instead of as dark 2012 flippant comedy, and actually explore and address the racial struggles Tacoma has, there's a LOT of interesting material to work with and genuine found-family potential. I feel like the fans were going through a refuse heap to find pieces of straw that they spun into gold while, in some cases, behaving as though the gold was already there and ignoring the trash around it.
I love the idea of a female abuse survivor and a man of colour teaming up with a bullied bisexual former child star whose mother was destroyed by the movie industry to take it down a peg or two. But it's also the sort of narrative that needs either own voices creating it or very deft handling with the aid of sensitivity readers, which is the polar opposite of 2012 Doug Walker.
I keep going back to this comment because it really captures part of why I wanted to revisit Demo Reel. The way some of its fanbase talk about it, you would think it’s this surprisingly well handled show with a cast of rich and tragic characters and important commentary. And while it has the bones to potentially be something like that, it really isn’t, so fans have to fill in that gap on their own. It’s really interesting to imagine what version of Demo Reel could be made if it actually matched that perception.
Brilliant comment! And I totally agree with you.
"I love the idea of a female abuse survivor and a man of colour teaming up with a bullied bisexual former child star whose mother was destroyed by the movie industry to take it down a peg or two." that actually does sound like something I'd love to watch, too bad it was this.
@@zoeb3573 Yeah, you could really create an incredible BoJack Horseman style show about trauma and how truly shitty and damaging the whole entertainment industry is with that premise. Doug Walker should really be ashamed of himself for completely ruining a potentially interesting idea for a show.
@@LadyEmilyPresents Let's Nolanize them...
I love that since Doug is such a horrendous actor each of his characters need to have different hats, because otherwise they'd be indistinguishable from each other.
@@jadedheartsz yeah okay
Oh man, tell me about it. Every technical aspect of these clips are horrible: the acting, the directing, the writing, the camera work, the lighting. I thought I was going to die of second-hand embarrassment during every clip.
@@jadedheartsz You're such a desperate twat. It's pathetic.
@@jadedheartsz Okay scat fetishist.
@@jadedheartsz Again, scat fetishist. Go ahead, tell me how literal human waste is perfectly fine. I fuckin dare ya.
Considering Doug got (justifiably) angry at the movie Patch Adams for the way it misrepresented a real man's life and distorted the tragic death of his male friend in order to repurpose it for the death of a female love interest who didn't exist its EXTREMELY hypocritical what he ends up doing with Jake and Elizabeth's real struggles here. Does he think because Demo Real isn't an attempt at a biopic it means he can pull the same crap he was previously condemning?
It fucks me up so much whenever I notice that Doug is FILMING HIS LIGHTING EQUIPMENT. Literally 80% of the shots in demo reel have pretty nice-looking softboxes, light domes, and multiple stands in the background, and yet EVERY SINGLE SCENE is over or under exposed. He's literally only using them as props to remind us that he's playing the part of a "director" on a "movie set" and my mind can't even comprehend how dumb that is. USE YOUR LIGHTS.
I am losing my mind over how funny this is. He’s too busy using them as props to actually use them for good lighting. Holy shit.
You _can_ do both! Just turn on the lights and move the camera back a few feet or mess with the field of view or something so they're in the shot!
Doug literally burst out laughing when he was told he should provide WATER to a crew of several dozen people filming in the DESSERT. So that doesn't surprise me at all.
@@timothymclean But that's effort Doug can instead use to superimpose his incredibly shit bargain bin "animations" on the screen while he makes an Ernie Hudson refference !
@@WeirdWonderful Mmm, dessert.
God, any time I hear about Doug Walker I have this weird feeling of melancholy. I used to watch him all the time, he was the person that got me invested in films and filmmaking and now... idk.
I have a similar experience. Nostalgia Critic got me through a lot of rough times mental health times and I looked forward to watching it at the end of a long day. I’ve moved on but it’s still... it’s hard
I feel the exact same way. Like, the idea that you could think things in a movie were bad was just so novel to me and got me into filmmaking as a career option. it's wild to think about.
Accidentally wrote an embarrassingly long comment to say exactly what you did in a much more succinct fashion, rip doug
Ditto. I used to really look up to this guy. I mean, he was one of the few and the proud who broke away from a normal job and became a full-time entertainer outside of the Hollywood system when that still wasn't the norm. He basically had a budding empire on the old website, That Guy With The Glasses.com. He always seemed like a great guy in all the behind-the-scenes footage, and as far as early internet motion-picture content goes, The Nostalgia Critic and his other characters were just about as good as you could get.
But... then he blew it all in 2012.
@@jadedheartsz And yet there are people who entered the business of online content creation up to a decade after he did who have enough to subs to make him look like a grain of salt by comparison.
There are people who started making web videos up to a decade after him who have transcended into the mainstream.
Doug's one million subscribers isn't that impressive when you consider this.
Thank you, now I don’t have to ever watch Demo Reel.
Nick, we’re watching it tonight. Suit up.
“Fucks Egoraptor from Game Grumps”
Never thought I’d hear that twice in the same video.
Now, I won't have a reason to come back to Demo Reel and Current Nostalgic Critic content.
@@ToonrificTariq sorry SON, it’s Tom and Jerry night.
@@CsBTransition if you want your poop to be rocky, do it with pocky.
19:06 Right here. This one single dumb moment is a perfect summation of why Doug Walker's attempts at comedy consistently fail, and it's not necessarily because "lol what if batman met mario??" In this moment, he did it. he told a half-decent joke.There's some comedy to be gleaned from Bruce Wayne being so terrified of Mario for some reason that he thinks to dress as him to terrify other people! It's absurd comedy, but it's comedy! All he had to do was stop at "it's time the world knew my fear" and he'd have a joke with a punchline! It's so close!
...and yet, he keeps going. He can't just leave it there; he needs to have Alfred stop and ask *why,* and then he has to stand there and *explain the joke.* He flew right past his own punchline and completely blew any comedic momentum the scene might've had.
This is not an isolated screwup; it's how most of Doug's comedic writing is. He'll do something absurd and ridiculous, sometimes juxtaposing opposite things to really lean into the absurdity...and then shoots himself in the foot by talking too much, or giving his actors too much to say. It's like he's not confident in his ability to get a joke across and let his delivery do the legwork so he has to keep fucking going so you're *sure* you know that yes, that was indeed meant to be a joke.
Would his work be good if he showed some restraint? Probably not. Would it be *better?* Probably, yeah.
The guy is Reddit incarnate
i seem to recall his old videos having some similar jokes, but the key difference was that they didn't drag on *too* long past the punchline, and were a lot more self-aware about how the rest of the scene is taking the piss out of the joke. like there used to be some legitimate writing chops there once upon a time but i fear they've long since been lost
This is exactly what he does all the time. I actually got a chuckle out of the idea that Bruce Wayne might be identified by his hand but he dragged out the whole one-gloved Batman thing for a full minute. It seems like when he can't decide which joke he wants to make about something he'll make all of them instead of just making a joke and moving on to something new.
id guess its because he actually doesn't have a typical sense of irony or what people find funny
Didn't College Humor have a video with that joke, but way better? Like, Batman gets hit with Scarecrow's Fear Toxin, and he's hallucinating and Crane is reveling in it, until he realizes Batman is afraid of stupid shit?
In the fullness of context, the Nostalgia Critic suit up at the end feels a lot less 'Tony Stark donning the Iron Man mk3 for the first time' and a lot more 'Darth Vader coming off the operating table at the end of Revenge of the Sith'.
True!
This might be the most perfect analogy I've ever seen. 👍
Significantly less cool, though.
And as pretty much always it's hard to tell how deliberate that was, given how bitter Doug was about having to go back to the nostalgia critic.
I remember liking the Nostalgia Critic's early reviews, because he made some good points sometimes about movies. For instance, he pointed out that the Care Bears movie *could've* done the predictable thing where the movie talks about love saving the day and then has something else do it, but instead stuck to its' moral. He talked about how Captain Planet trying to tackle AIDS was really out of its' depth and in retrospect feels poorly done and almost disrespectful. And when he reviewed an episode of Batman: the Animated Series that had a disabled villain, he really had a lot of sympathy for her and talked about how the world failed her. When I was 12, he seemed like a comedian who, as loud and ranty as he could get, had kindness to him and wanted media to not be dickish or insensitive about some topics.
Then Demo Reel hit. The sensitive topics were handled so poorly that it ripped apart that mental image of him I'd had, made worse by the series not being very good. Eventually I just stopped watching him and watched other creators I'd found via the site instead. I think your video is the first time I've seen anyone point out how uncomfortable and gross some of the jokes/Doug's character's backstory is, so I'd just like to say thank you. For years I've wondered if I was being too sensitive, but now I realize that 1., it's valid to be made uncomfy by this, and 2. a lot of this was bad at the time, it's not merely a matter of it aging poorly.
Even the way he digests other people’s opinions on movies (i.e. Someone going “Oh, I actually love that movie!”) felt off over the years.
Like, sure, the critic himself was known to shit on other peoples’ love for movies he felt were bad, but I felt it was played off as a legitimate character flaw rather than something to support. Meanwhile, non-NC Doug would make it clear that it’s only a silly character thing, and that it’s OK to like movies others might not like. They are movies, after all.
Post-reboot, though, things started to feel off. He would start to write fans of certain movies as antagonists in NC (like the “dumb” Adam Sandler fans). His non-NC stuff also started getting a little iffy to said fans, as well.
It made me feel rather confused. Like, *is* Doug Walker tolerant of those who like movies he doesn’t? Was the pre-reboot stuff BS or did he legitimately change for the worst over the years?
I know this is different from what you’ve mentioned, and maybe this is an unusual point to talk about, but I’ve definitely slowly backed away from Doug’s content for awhile partially because of this (plus the fact that the humor in it just wasn’t personally for me anymore).
The whole “not-so-awesome” ordeal didn’t help, either.
I’ve learned in recent years that if you ever find yourself asking “am I being too sensitive,” you’re probably not being too sensitive, you’re probably justified in reacting the way you are
People who actually make a big deal over nothing usually don’t have that kind of self-awareness, and toxic people love to use the “you’re being too sensitive” defense to justify the horrible things they do
I know this is off topic, but is Lady Emily a "lady?" It sounds a lot like a guy trying to do a girl voice.
@@AlcoholicBoredom I believe she’s a trans woman? Not sure though.
@@AlcoholicBoredom I mean, I'm just assuming. She's still a girl as far as I care.
The issue with Doug Walker is he only knows how to write one type of character and style of humor: basically a Yakko Warner and/or Groucho Marx type character - flippant, snarky, always one step ahead of everyone else, and constantly winking at the audience with random non-sequitur absurdist humor, meta-humor/fourth-wall breaking, and pop-culture references. This character archetype is rarely self-deprecating and constantly torments his co-stars, but theoretically gets away with it because the Universe they inhabit is supposed to be an absurdist realm that transcends any notion of morality.
You can tell Doug watched a lot of Animaniacs or Bugs Bunny and loves those type of characters. The problem is that Yakko (along with Yakko's progenitor, Groucho Marx) were written by people with a lot more talent and restraint. These types of characters need to be written in a way that plays up the absurdist nature of the Universe they inhabit - they exist in an amoral Universe where you can torment someone and it's funny. But if mishandled, it's easy for this type of character to come off as egotistical, mean-spirited or nihilistic. I think Doug just too often veered into the nihilistic, mean-spirited side that easily emerges if this type of character doesn't stay firmly within the realm of the absurd. Plus, he depends way too much on obvious, over-saturated pop-culture references or parodies that had already been done to death.
I'd recommend watching the vlog "Doug's Top 15 Comedic Influences" from years ago. Explains a lot. He does say that Looney Tunes and Animaniacs are both big influences on his comedy and you can definitely see this. Like a lot of his popculture humor and meta-humor feels very Animaniacs-ish just done with microbudget live-action instead of good animation which detracts a lot. I'd argue you can see the Looney Tunes influence most blatantly in something like Kickassia.
However it's actually Daffy Duck who's the biggest influence on the Critic's character. Not Bugs Bunny. He's also cited characters like Professor Fate from The Great Race and even the Queen of Hearts from Disney's Alice in Wonderland as influences on the character. As in, loud angry insecure comedy-foil antagonists. But there's more besides that.
@@TheSoulvian and another influence is the show Blackadder starring Rowan Atkinson as a family of mostly snarky, deadpan, intelligent straight men surrounded by a world of idiots. What works about Blackadder is both Atkinson’s smooth performance that doesn’t make the audience hate him, but at the same time the narrative knows that the protagonists are jerks and so they often get their comeuppance at the end of each season or at least are portrayed as being the terrible people they are who are basically villains.
I think a big problem is he internalized the "the root of comedy is pain at someone's expense" as the inherent basis of comedy rather than a generalization on how it often functions.
It explains why something like his The Wall parody is both so fascinating and frustrating at the same time - he sabotages any comedic potential out the gate because he's so hyperfixated on being snarky and building up the most juvenile criticisms he can through awful "parody".
It's even worse because there's plenty of bits in the source material that would actually make for a funny parody or analysis, but he essentially has to ignore everything the movie shows or says to either mock a non-sequitor or engage in weirdly self-aggrandizing segments where he can just say his opinions as a character in the narrative
@@FronkZappa Even when I was still a megafan of Doug, his statement that comedy should be based on misery always bothered me. I always thought that comedy and horror are opposite sides off the same coin. They both brings in an intense atmosphere and build up to something and then they hit you hit with a payoff. Misery can't part of that, it is common in both comedy and horror that characters are suffering greatly. But you can point to plenty of comedies (and horror movies) where the characters aren't suffering that are still great. Hell, one of Dougs major influences, MST3K, is a great example of that. Now you can argue that the characters are suffering from watching bad movies, but the true meat of the humor of the show is they are shouting one-liners based on whats happening in the films.
@@backtoklondike I think you're probably right, and same about the "misery is the basis of comedy". Horror and Comedy both (as far as I can tell) work by subverting the normal. Horror abjects to create discomfort which then brings terror, and comedy does the same except it brings humour, and the line between the two seems to be very thin, which is actually very odd. Anywho, I don't think Doug understands that, and there is a certain irony that a man whose only understanding of humour being misery is now stuck in his own karmic hell. I know there's a lot of controversy surrounding him but still. Poor guy.
I think it's fascinating, as you say, to see how, with more work and a change in tone/discussion the over-arching plot of Demo Reel, if incorporated earlier, would have helped shape and define the series.
Like, when you unpack the backstories of the main three, and even, to an extent, the joke cameramen, you find that they're all struggling with legacy/history. Tacoma was awarded for taking down HIS FATHER'S Ponzi scheme, and now no one will give him work. Rebecca is fighting against a sexist and neglectful system while dealing with trauma from childhood sexual abuse and neglect. The crew are implicitly former criminals, working in a legitimate business. A Demo Reel is, by definition, presenting an Actor's past as evidence for their future: here's the good things they did, hire them. The COMPANY Demo Reel is attempting to remake movies that they think failed. The entire series is thematically, all about second chances, on overcoming your past and making something new. Even the specific movies chosen for parody/homage have plenty of space to explore these themes, and how the industry treats women and actors of color, allowing for actual character arcs. Hell, you could even use the redemptive idea/labor of love argument as the counter to the Swede Actor's Guild at the end: it doesn't matter if their movies are GOOD. Making good movies didn't save Dupree's mother. Making bad movies doesn't mean Dupree doesn't have fans. People need things that make them happy, and it's not your place (or, as the pay-off to the character arc) Dupree's place to render judgment on them.
But the show, as presented, is almost unaware of these connections, or thinks it would be dumb to delve into them for more than a couple moments. It HINTS at a good narrative, without fleshing it out.
If only Doug Walker was a better writer, Demo Reel could have said something. Something purposeful, meaningful, coherent. Instead, we have "What if Batman met Mario?", jokes about sexual abuse, and appropriated tragedy that builds to nothing.
Doug has little interest in anything aside from getting a laugh, which does make it odd that he even invoked such controversial subject matter, I guess he was trying to give his humor some teeth.
I think the deeper problem is that Doug Walker isn't capable of following through on any of that. Dan Olson really hit the nail on the head when he said that "Doug wants to be a filmmaker. He wants to make art. But he can't, because he's a fundamentally incurious person who isn't much interested in how other people think or feel. All of his ideas boil down to 'what if Batman met Mario?'." In order for Demo Reel to have gone in the directions that are implied would require someone who understands narrative, and Doug Walker doesn't. At all. He doesn't get *why* good movies work, and his understanding of why bad movies are bad is limited to surface-level plot holes or plot contrivances -- the Cinemasins "gotcha! I win" grade of criticism.
Hit the nail on the head.
it's like rwby but for mid 2000s movie reviews
That ending just gave me an intense flash of existential dread imagining this from Doug’s perspective. It’s like a monkey’s paw kinda thing, he got exactly what he wanted but in the worst possible way.
@@jadedheartsz The editorials are definitely still great to rewatch. If he only did stuff like that without his dumbass personality and all that shit.... I'd still be watching.
@@jadedheartsz lol The Who meaning of “stagnant” is unmoving and unchanging. CA has lost most of its creators and exclusively relies on NC to stay open. That’s literally stagnation. I know you’re autistically obsessed with NC, and any criticism of which hurts you on a deep emotional level, but you gotta move on from this manchild phase. Because right now all you’re doin is proving that the only people who watch NC these days are sad manchildren, and actual children.
@@zix1257 still no need to be an condescending asshole about it
@@jadedheartsz you know, it's really easy to see you going around every comment thread shilling for him.
@@jadedheartsz everyone come look at the shill and how they react once exposed for what they are
The craziest thing about Doug Walker and Demo Reel to me is that the man spent years and years watching movies and tv shows and riffing on what made them bad, and yet he doesn't seem to have . . . internalized any of it? Like, he learned nothing about filmmaking or what makes a joke successful or how to create compelling characters. You really have to WORK to remain that ignorant. Especially because (per the Not So Awesome document) some members of Channel Awesome who were actually trained filmmakers offered to help him and he shut them down.
I wonder if maybe Doug is one of those people who only looks at the surface level of the media that he consumes. People like that can recognize that something is good but they don't understand WHY it's good. They don't attempt deeper analysis because they view that sort of thing as pretentious and unnecessary. Since they only look at the surface level, they THINK they understand everything that they need to.
I feel like Doug has this mindset that he's just a silly internet critic, so he can get away with cruddier content. There was a video he made where he was responding to criticism of Kickassia in his "ask that guy" character. And his attitude was essentially, "I'm providing you with free entertainment, you have no right to complain"
@@StarlightPrism Considering how he summarized what the Wall was about, I'd say that's a pretty accurate description.
Most of his film criticism was pretty shallow and nitpicky, I don't think he learned anything from his reviews
@@StarlightPrism It definitely seems to be the case that he's not an especially deep thinker, and the Nostalgia Critic wasn't exactly what you'd call hard-hitting analysis. It's just odd to me that someone who cares enough about sketch comedy to want to make a career doing it devoted so little time and brainpower to understanding what makes it work.
you either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself doing the supervillain shuffle.
😂😂
Get the like train on this comment. Gold
Or in some of his employee’s cases, the Sex Offender Shuffle
I think it's very telling that so many of the people Doug hurt an alienated have gone on to do video essays about him, and the bulk of their reactions are not hate or anger, but a sort of sad, tired pity.
Who did? All I've seen from the people I watch/watched were like 'please refer to the Change the Channel document I don't want to talk about it anymore'
Not sure why. He made a lot of money being completely mediocre.
@@annamaria9073I really love Kyle Kallgren (Brows Held High)'s essay "Nostalghia Critique." I wouldn't say that one isn't angry, but I'd definitely say there's a lot of pity to it as well
@@margaretmadole oh I haven't seen that yet. Hold up I have to do something.
Edit: I like it, but I feel it's more about the work of a reviewer on TH-cam than about Doug or Channel Awesome
@@annamaria9073 Lindsey Ellis left channel awesome in 2015 to do her video essays and that went well too the hate campaign against her in 2021
So bizarre to think that there was a time when Doug Walker was popular enough, and Arin Hansen obscure enough, that an episode of Demo Reel could have a cameo from Egoraptor.
2012 was a WEIRD year.
Arin Hansen obscure in 2012? Nah. He'd been immensely popular since 2008. Granted, he was known primarily as Egoraptor/ an animator rather than that Game Grumps era Arin but regardless: to label him as obscure in 2012 - even obscure 'enough' relative to Doug - is a little strong.
Yeah. 2012 was when bronies ruled the earth lol. The early 2010s were a lot of fun but it is weird in retrospect.
@@rommix0 You mean when Bronies were sent death threats for existing right? Because that's how I remember the old days. It was glorious.
@@inspectorjavert9868 not really. 2012 was when bronies were widely accepted. I know cause I used to be one for a brief period. The brony shaming came much later.
@@MeansofIntrigue Well, it's all about degrees. People who were in the know and who liked funny internet animation knew Egoraptor. The individual videos were huge but Egoraptor wasn't a "brand" the way Game Grumps is now a massive brand, or the way Nostalgia Critic/Channel Awesome was (trying to be) a brand.
Can we all acknowledge the irony that, as you go over at first, the Nostalgia Critic, a show whose entire premise is that things you liked as a kid often turn out to be not that good when you re-watch them as an adult, is now, for you and lots of other people, something they liked as kids but found to be kinda bad when watched in adulthood? That's some Shakespearean tragedy shit, right there. He could save others, but not himself.
I've known in passing that "demo reel was really bad" but I never knew that it really was THIS BAD, hot damn. This took me on a JOURNEY.
Incredible first video!
Aww thank you so much!! I’m glad I could introduce you to everything Demo Reel has to offer
Wait, this is a first video? Holy hell, well done! Consider me subscribed!
@@FunnyClementine It's her first video? I was about to check out her channel for more.
@@fakegeek5462 the fact that it's a trigger warning or that they included subject matter that requires it?
@@fakegeek5462 Trigger warnings exist for a reason. People get 'triggered' by talk or depictions of traumatic events. A warning allows them to prepare, or avoid re-living those events in their mind.
The fact that one was included shows consideration for the video's audience, and is in no way 'childish' - quite the opposite.
I actually ran into Rachel Tietz at a local theater. I had seen her in some of the "return of the Nostalgia Critic" episodes, and found her honestly very funny with great comedic timing. So I said I was a "great fan of her work with Doug Walker." (So I wouldn't embarrass her by explicitly saying she was in crappy internet stuff)
I feel now like it's a backhanded insult.
I'm also glad Malcolm Ray is starting to get more attention thanks to Lackadaisy, even back then he was shown to be a surprisingly good voice actor and now he can finally show off his skill
the demo reel tv tropes pages makes repeated references to “the shipping” that the fans did and i have been burdened with this knowledge for years.
the.... the *what*
Who...who did they ship.
Silveriver 44 Doug and Rob. I will not be taking further questions.
@@justintheis9216 *...*
Oh god, I remember all the Channel Awesome shipping. I remember the CA k*nkmeme too.
And I’ll always have that knowledge.
She really said "My first big video is going to be a 1 hour essay on why Doug Walker bad" and that was the absolute best move she could have made !
@@jadedheartsz I would disagree on the "talented" part but he's a known asshole who covered his boss when he sexuality assaulted several woman so literally who cares if he's talented. Also there's the whole thing about how he treated the actors on the set of "To boldly flee" it's a long story but if ever want to look it up it's terrible and he basically left the actors to get hungry and dehydrated during a very hot day and was an overall asshole on set. So yeah. Don't care.
Me : I don't support Doug Walker because he covered for a rapist.
You : It has been proven to be untrue so you're an asshole.
??? That insult sounds so bad on your part. Like omg I'm so sorry I believed several 1 hour videos that explained everything in detailed and confused TGWTG producer with Jew Wario after several years of this happening while there are stil several accusation of different kinds on Doug and his brother and the former producer of TGWTG anyway. Also good job at linking a video of a guy who turned off comments and likes and starts the video being ultra defensive surely this'll be a good video. Also he even states himself that Channel Awesome is still terrible so why are you attacking me like that hello ?
@@GabyyRose Don't bother with this kid. He's harassing me, too.
@@ElvenRaptor Lol I wrote a 3rd reply and TH-cam said "Nah fam don't bother" and the comment didn't show up so even them knew x)
Yeah I saw him replying several other comments. Dude needs to chill. I mean I'm literally siding with him and saying I was wrong and dude calls me a liar after calling me an asshole because I believde what several hundreds of thousands also believe to be true... like ok...
@@GabyyRose your points are kinda bullshit ngl
Ed Wood objectively knew more about filmmaking than Cinema Sins. Cinema Sins is basically just Nostalgia Critic without the constant screaming.
Definitely.
The sad part is that when he's does more straight forward content,it isn't that bad
I hate entitled critics who think their word is gospel. I hate even more the audience who enables them. Cinema Sins and Doug Walker even did a crossover years ago.
It's a little unfair to compare the two tho, because at least cinema sins doesn't have controversy about an abusive company and don't add stupid skits In the middle of the sins count. At least there make an attempt at a review. At least they don't proclaim that they love the films they are "critisizing" and then stepping on that claim with high heels. Cinema sins may be a bad place to look for actual review content, but at least, at least, someone could enjoy it, and laugh at it. Nostalgia critic fails to do these things.
@@vanroyal244 As much as I find Cinema Sins to be bad for reviews, disconnecting it as a review and it can be enjoyable as dry humor making fun of nitpicky reviewers
That tonal whiplash at the end of Demo Reel… My mind just went to how Ctrl-Alt-Del went and tried to do “Loss”
| | |
| | | _
At least the guy making the comic had a reason for doing that. He was trying to deal with his own personal trauma.
Doug, on the other hand, just made things up as he went along.
Loss at least delivered a pretty powerful scene (even if it's just a 4-panel comic). I remember finding it without knowing CAD nor having any context and being confused at the memes. The comic is earnestly sad and makes a lot with no dialogue.
The ending about how Doug Walker is a sad figure in that he is stuck in a role he no longer finds enjoyable is especially sad when you remember his video where he walked out of his "dead end soul sucking office job". How is the Nostalgia Critic different from where he was before?
Jesus fucking christ, that is a bleak outlook
But a very appropriate one, too
@@jadedheartsz Idk about that. It's been a minute since I've watched NC, but I do recall multiple times when he talks about how stuck he feels from time to time. I've seen entire episodes where he compares the channel in its early days to what it is now.
As absurd as this may sound, it kinda makes me wish someone would do a dark comedy biopic in the vein of Ed Wood or Disaster Artist about Doug Walker as this as this young, aspiring office worker who breaks into the You-Tube scene early on and gets corrupted with time into this sketchy, abuse-ignoring businessman who does a gig he clearly hates for years and watches all of his old fanbase turn on him.
@@jadedheartsz But like, he kept it hidden from the public, to the point where people didn't know about that until after JW died, and the document is filled with other cases similar to that (where the CA crew kept things under wraps and didn't get authorities involved). Also, like, if he still kept all his subscribers since day one, why have their been so many fan backlashes and people unsubscribing en masse after everything from videos like the Cranks one or the Change the Channel situation? It feels like a lot of those subscribers are either new to the channel or are unaware of everything involved with it.
@@jadedheartsz Yeah, because women being smuggled into women's shelters into the middle of the night is a sign of a loving, respecting employer who deserves defending at all costs.
You seem way too sold on Doug's narratives and I'm not continuing this conversation if you can't admit that he did his employees wrong (plus, keep shaming Alison when, at least to her credit, she didn't lie about and blacklist a former co-producer stealing their significant other without said person having any feelings for them to begin with like a certain Brad did). I hope you enjoy knowing that Lindsay Ellis and Linkara will never collab with Doug again.
The best way I can put it is that Doug's story isn't sad because he deserved better, it's sad because he could have been better.
41:07 Jake Lloyd actually went to my elementary school many years before I had attended, and the teacher I had for second grade, Mrs. Talbot, was the last teacher he ever had through the public school system. She used to use him as the example for our class about how bullying can happen to anyone, as he was pulled out of school after all his peers relentlessly picked on him for his acting in Episode I and his small stature
That part about Doug’s homage(?) to Jake Lloyd and Elizabeth Hartman sticks out to me, because it really speaks to Doug’s failure to effectively communicate his ideas using the medium. As Dan Olson might put it, Doug just doesn’t understand the language of comedy. He doesn’t understand that using similar-but-different names for story elements makes it sound like parody. He doesn’t understand that using real-life events as backstory for an intentionally obnoxious, whiny character who we’re meant to laugh at frames those events as being kind of a joke too. And he doesn’t understand that positioning an over-the-top kidnapping as next in this sequence of events just… undercuts everything.
this description of the demo reel s1 finale just makes me think of "loss": Hack creator gets tired of writing D- comedy, tries to write drama instead. The result is still awful, and it's even worse bc the creator's main idea is "bring up a really heavy subject, just toss it at the audience like a big dead fish."
This actually could be an interesting topic for a whole long form essay. When creators feel pinned in by their funny creation and feel compelled to make something that involves a big rug pull at the end in an attempt to make pathos.
A whopper of a fish
I l i
II I_
When I watched Doug walker at first I assumed the shitty skits that happened during the reviews were shitty on purpose and that Doug was full of himself because it was funny. The more I learn about him the more I realize they were just shitty and Doug is just kinda full of himself.
I can't believe that I thought that NC and AVGN were so similar, now when I look back at it I see that James is a beautiful person and not like AVGN, but Doug... I don't want to remember him and I'm a little bit ashamed that I liked him
@@yakovradloff I watched Doug when I was pretty young and while it helped to spark my interest in media analysis it made me have so many dumb cringey takes as a kid so I can totally realte to being ashamed about liking him lol.
I started to notice that when he started doing actual reviews with his brother, Sibling Rivalry.
@@yakovradloff Don't be. Doug did a good job pretending to be someone much better than he really is. It's not your fault you fell for the ruse. We all did.
Ive only seen one nostolgia critic review, and I never watched again because he complained that "It was too different from the source material," then in the same video said "They didnt change up enough from the original vereion." Literally contradicts himself with complaints lmao.
The problem with Doug Walker is not that he's untalented, is that he refuses to accept it and progress in his craft. He was surounded by so many talented people and he, instead of learning from them, cliped their wings to be as bad as he was. I don't feel pity for him, he's so full of himself he never grew.
@lucy y yeah, he is, but that is not necesarily a problem. You can learn and develop a talent, but he refuses to, that's the real problem (in my eyes at least).
Essentially he got in on a very short-lived trend when something like the early NC made sense, and refused to notice there are only so many films where his shtick truly works or how the rest of the world moved on. He thought he established a new paradigm for how things are done in this age of -internet- -Web 2.0- social media, old rules don't apply, yada yada...
And, in a way, he did, "some dude's over-the-top rants on pop culture" shows, some as old as Nostalgia Critic, are alive and well. But they moved on in a way NC really didn't. (AVGN slowed down as the supply of truly awful retro games that could justify that sort of thing started to exhaust, and started doing less ranty reviews of other media, Angry Joe added news, streaming and cinematography and production values Doug Walker never had...)
NC missed that bus and is stuck as a low-effort rant show and nothing more now. OTOH, he could have gone full Carl of Swindon or something like that and got another few years of glory in 2014-19... It's a good thing he didn't.
@@nebufabu Totally agree. Plus with AVGN, James had other video ideas and experience that generally went over well with his fans. I checked channel awesome (haven't watched in a decade) and he's doing weekly NC videos. Who still watches that stuff? Lol
I met him years ago. He was nice to me but you definitely had the sense he was full of himself, especially at his panel I went to.
I met him years ago. He was nice to me but you definitely had the sense he was full of himself, especially at his panel I went to.
This entire video makes me want to walk up to Doug Walker and tell him: "I want you to make a movie. It can be a short movie, maybe thirty minutes if you want. But it must not contain ANY references or jokes to any other movies nor can it be in any way about the film industry or about criticism. It can be a comedy, drama, romance, comedic drama, anything. And preferably, it should not include any characters that you have played so far."
If he were ever to do that, if he ever were forced to make something that is completely original and has no references to other works, I would be curious what the result would be.
That shit would be horrendous😭😭
Personally… I think he’d have an existential crisis and would implode, perhaps having to take a break from any and all work as the thought of making something original spirals into a deep-seated phobia that never is able to fully leave him. Like some kind of Lovecraftian boogeyman that is always watching Doug, but is *just* out of sight and everyone thinks he’s just going crazy because he can’t articulate the horror he feels…
Or he’d just start it up, immediately get tired of being original, and then immediately break all of your rules you had for him.
He would have to actually think for once. Doug has the same creative muscles as the people who made RWBY. They only know "creativity" from the stuff they consumed so they basically just make references or steal content whole cloth to make their abominations.
Here's what I would do given your challenge if I was in Doug's shoes.
It would actually be a movie where he isn't the main fucking character for once. It would be a movie about someone else struggling with depression. 10 years out of college with a writing degree and struggling to write about something meaningful and deep. Their whole writing career online was writing smut for MLP. He dawns a new pen-name and starts being serious.
The reality is that every time he tries to write something serious it gets laughed off for being amateur. Eventually they try writing children's stories and he finds success until his account gets hacked and he's ousted as a MLP fanfic writer. We see the rise and fall of a writer who can't escape his past.
@@amarevanhook7453yeah
@NobleAbsinthe
A couple sentences into your synopsis I was like "should I tell him that's just Avenue Q?" and then you really diverged and yeah...that'd be good. I personally would go for a time-lapse angle, showing how the multiple fandom they like DID bring them happiness (even if in a shitpost kind of way) and then yada yada the rise and fall and shame but end it on a bittersweet sort of note showing that they do have _potential,_ they have skills they've curated from all the past work they've done and there are many avenues of work they can persue, but they have get out of their own way. Ego, accepting past faults and shame, recognizing their supporters, etc etc. A fictional story about a lolcow essentially lmao. But Doug could never take that kind of angle, he'd either shit on them relentlessly and lose the sympathy part or just make the Gary Stu a self insert.
"They decided to feed Rebecca Sugar"
Fuck I'm glad someone did, they're not going to write cartoons on an empty stomach.
You have to make sure you keep your talent fed, preferably with fresh vegetables and free range eggs.
I for some reason thought that this was a pun on Rebecca Sugar
@@gunnymaru2900 it was 😭
@@lastlife0726 lol I got your joke, but for some reason I thought Nostalgia Critic was that clever. That was my fault 😪
I had similar with "...the vampires in Twilight sparkle..."
At just one minute in, "better known for his character The Nostalgia Critic" is a cold, cold sentence
@@jadedheartsz please give me your definition of successful? Cause I don’t think it means what you think it means.
@@jadedheartsz ok Doug
@@jadedheartsz it’s a self-defeating cycle of defending someone/something in a thread full of people only here to bash it. Walker’s collaborations with other creatives with notable celebrity like Don Bluth, James Rolfe, CinemaSins, TeamFourStar, among others voice actors and charitable efforts isn’t really up for debate as to his success as the Nostalgia Critic - he’s done alright for himself considering.
This very video is the only popular content for Lady Emily, whom is profiting off of pointing out the failures of someone else who so far is way more successful than themselves, the same way as NC does/did. The folks here are hear to pile on hating Doug & laugh at his poor choices and not hear any counterpoints to that feeling. I came for “the tragedy of Demo Reel” too, but not to crap on NC as I still do enjoy his work on Channel Awesome. Demo Reel was a curiosity of a passion project that Doug still thinks has potential 8yrs after its failure; I came to see the origins of that. The show IS pretty crap though, yet it’s kind of a fascination that the remaining Channel Awesome team still looks to Demo Reel to draw inspiration from their biggest failure because they continue to have faith that they can make it work.
@@aztn19 I think the problem with most of the people you mentioned is they got so big SO quickly and never realized how fleeting their success is and sadly most of them dont have a backup plan. Doug for instance kind of self inflicted his wound by killing the Critic to make this show which drove away his audience (though i will also be fair to Doug and say I think he surrounded himself with people who are just toxic to large audiences and then having Blip shut down did more damage long term to CA than killing the Critic did). Im watching now as it really seems that TFS is going down the same route as CA where they kill off the golden goose and frankly arent replacing it with somthing people want to see. Honestly as cruel as it sounds Doug is a great example of what you cant do if you become sucessful which is put yourself before your audience and videos like this kind of need to exist to show where the flaws are so other people dont do the same thing
@@jadedheartsz No it doesn’t. Working with an acclaimed director doesn’t make you successful, anyone with money can work with acclaimed people. But since you start resorting to insults, I highly doubt you can comprehend an intelligent conversation. And calling me a troll because I disagree with you opinion also just goes to show that you are intellectually stunted as I assumed you would be.
I feel bad for Malcolm Ray in particular. When he's given an acting role, he is a good actor. He's believable in the character he plays and he's wasted being stuck with Doug. Especially when Doug has him try to play a Doug character, gurning and wide eyed and weird.
Malcolm deserves so much better.
No one has a gun to his head making him stay there
@@dirklogan4699 No-one said he did.
Idiots like you need better rhetoric. Same tired replies every time.
@@DragonNexus "wrong statement"
*called out on it"
"no shut up I'm right"
@@beesree39 the post I replied to is deleted...so how would you know?
@@shawnfoster4506 my own personal theory on this is Doug's using some manipulation tactics to get Malcom to stay by reminding him that CA got him his "career" (as much as being supporting characters in stale skits on a channel that's far past its prime could be considered a career, anyways), Doug and the CA crew would be lost without Malcom, Malcom owes it to them to stay there, etc. If Doug takes pride in running a business terribly, I'm sure he'd happily exploit his own employees' emotions in a desperate bid to keep them around.
the best summary of Doug and Rob's skills as film critics is their opinion on Spider-Verse alternating between animating different characters in 12 and 24fps - "I guess they ran out of money for animation or something".
Jesus christ
I refuse to believe this is true. It's pretty clear what movie makers were doing with that difference.
@@oninaru This is the same man who looked at _The Wall's_ songs/scenes of the abusive 1950's British primary school, complete with images of elementary-aged schoolchildren, and assumed Roger Waters was complaining about how high school bites. And who called Waters's reflection on the trauma inflicted by WW2, and _The Wall_ accusing the Allies of following the same path the Axis had, a "World War 2 reference".
Doug (and/or whoever else contributes to the criticism components of _Nostalgia Critic)_ is hidebound by a sort of literalism which works adequately for most crummy kid movies people feel a vague nostalgia for, but poorly for anything more ambitious than that. They also don't seem to give their first impressions a second thought, don't double-check it against the actual subject to make sure it fits.
@@timothymclean Very fair point. Sometimes I just forgot how surface level and incapable of understand anything deeper than Looney Tunes Doug is.
@@oninaru noo.. Noo he has a surface level understanding of that too
If they’d been wise enough to stop the whole Mario routine at “Mario scares me. It’s time the rest of the world shared my fear.” it would have actually been an OK joke.
i think it kinda sounds like a bdg line
Yeah Doug indulges in jokes like that all the time, ones with a pretty funny if “easy” punchline, but then another character calls out the punchline for not making sense and then they just talk back and forth for the next minute while you’re waiting for a second punchline that never comes because the humor is in how awkward the interaction is and how dumb one of them is, Mario in this case.
It's the kind of joke that can be funny because it's random and out of left field, if a bit boring and low hanging, but as soon as you try to indulge in the joke it just loses its shock value and falls completely flat
The reveal that he was in a Mario costume got a chuckle out of me, but as soon as it started dragging on it became absolutely painful.
The whole "lmao Mario jumps on turtles, that's so weird" thing is *so* played out in Internet culture. Like, it was a tired old joke in around 2008, let alone the time Demo Reel came out.
Honestly the Mario fakeout scene *could* have been funny if it had just been Alfred shaking his head in resignation instead of stretching it out for minutes
Something I’ve noticed across all of Doug’s projects is that he constantly calls his work “love letters”. That he’s so in love with movies and that all of his work is meant to showcase how great the medium can be. Yet it’s all so mean-spirited you can’t help but wonder if he even likes movies at all.
His Pink Floyd The Wall review is such a blazing example. Love it or hate it, it's a film that doesn't deserve the disrespect that Doug dumped on it. The lame and insulting parody songs wouldn't make anyone laugh or be entertained, no matter how much you hated the wall or how stupid your humor is. And the actual review at the end is "It was fine!" To justify the 40 minutes of constant torture. And then to rub salt in the wound, he decided to have a ROCK STAR sing the *SpongeBob SquarePants* theme song, because why not? I-I don't even know what audience it's made for...
How can you claim to love TV and film, absorb so much of it and not pick up *anything* meaningful about the artistry or creative process?
@@vanroyal244 To be fair to Doug, Corey Taylor is somewhat known for playing the spongebob squarepants theme at solo concerts. He didn't conjure that idea out of nothing. To be unfair to Doug, it makes perfect sense that he didn't come up with the gag himself.
th-cam.com/video/Q5OLtoY70AI/w-d-xo.html
He believes all humour is fundamentally mean, which in itself, is a defensible theory, he just never thought deeply about all the implications and edge cases... Like the affectionate parodies and how people can love both them and the works/genres parodied. So, he just decided adding "it's a love letter" is simply a polite thing people say to hide they're being mean, he never thought about how affectionate parodies really work.
Yeah, his "The Wall" review not only showed to his last 3 fans how big he misses the point of what he criticizes, but also how mean-spirited he is. Like when he made fun of Another Brick in The Wall p. II because to him the idea of showing school in such a bad light was ridiculous (even tho it was Waters' experience after WWII) and at the same time thinking that the scene was a reference to the Hollocaust when it was just simply representing a slaughterhouse.
I'm amused by the idea that Doug Walker, Rob Walker, and Mike Michaud are the only content creators on the internet so incompetent that they could make a series with no budget and still somehow end up in debt
That could happened with Pop Quiz Hotshot... if Indiegogo sent investigators to sense for fraud.
Remember: They didn't just shoot this in someone's apartment's spare room, or in an empty office, or something. They rented (mediocre) studio space. They paid employees (I hope). They bought costumes. There is only so half you can ass these expenses, and Doug was trying to put his full ass into this production.
Debt doesn't always come from racking up huge bills. Sometimes it comes from small bills combined with even smaller paychecks.
@@timothymclean “only so half you can ass things.” I spy someone else who has watched the Folding Ideas video about Doug.
Larry the Guru is still on that site.
@@jeremyzak654 mainly because CA quite literally forgot that he is even a part of it, he never got invited to any crossover events outside of maybe one collab in the last decade, he mainly focused on youtube, never really mentions it.
I think, what makes the Jake Lloyd inclusion especially bad is that from what I can tell, *everyone* struggled to deliver George Lucas' dialogue. He doesn't seem to be especially good at directing actors. Lloyd was just doing the best he could and got hung out to dry as a symbol. Reducing it to "he was a bad actor lol" when he was *11* feels, at best, disingenuous. I dunno, maybe it's more thoughtless than anything.
Mark Hamill is famously quoted as saying "who talks like this, George?!" About his lines. Jake Lloyd was an easy scapegoat and deserves a massive apology
Yeah, when George managed to make even Samuel L "motherfucking" Jackson deliver an inhumanly bland performance, it's hard to blame any of the actors for the delivery they went with.
@@darkninjafirefox And Harrison Ford said "You can write this shit, but you sure as hell can't say it."
The fact that he was 8 when E1:TPM came out makes your comment so much more valid
No it's because a bunch of man babies were mad and dunking on kids is something geeks, especially back then, thought was really funny and edgy. It wasn't thoughtless, they just didn't care.
Wasn't Doug Walker the same guy who criticized Captain Planet for not having the capability of tackling such a sensitive subject as AIDS? And now he thinks he's capable of tackling the issue of suicide?
I’m calling it, he’s going to commit suicide in, while being in character as nostalgia critic.
@@paulmajano um.... ok
@@paulmajano someone that deluded probably wouldn't have killed off the Nostalgia Critic and only revive him due the sequel project being a disaster.
@@paulmajano 0
He made a very similar criticism of M. Night Shyamalan with Split back in 2017, saying he was tackling an issue that he wasn't fit to tackle... So still not the most self-aware person.
I will say, I do remember a recent joke where he said something about pretentious wannabe filmmakers or something and flashed images of a bunch of people on the screen in quick succession as examples, the last of which being a photo of himself from like 10 years ago, so maybe he's a bit more humble now?
I think the sketch with Batman dressing up as Mario was genuinely funny ... until he's ask why and attempts to explain it ... and in the process doesn't just completely drag the joke down into the mud, but also reveals he doesn't know what's potentially funny about his own joke.
Same
“If you have to explain the joke, there is no joke!” - The Joker
Yeah I thought that as well while i was watching this, then as it began to drag and I thought "okay they're probably going to spend way too long on this" the text popped up on the screen saying "this scene goes on for two and a half minutes".
Honestly, this is a problem I have with a lot of modern humor, where a joke that's kinda funny gets dragged out and become completely unfunny. I think Family Guy does this a lot as well.
Same I feel that goes for alot of his jokes. If they are funny he ruins it by making it too long ir does it over and over again
There's like two funny visual gags;
12:47 Donnie takes his glasses off, realizes he needs them to see, and puts them on again
18:08 Donnie trying on the Batman mask and his hat at the same time
Aside from that, not much else.
honestly i always thought the joke about Rebecca Stoné's name having a silent accent was pretty funny
They work because they're one off gags that don't literally go on for 180 seconds
@@ltbq Meh..
He was one of the biggest creators on this site at one point. Back when youtube was audience driven. Long before the algorithm we all know and love came into being. You have no else to blame but yourselves ;)
@@GAoftheBlackFlames true
Fun acting tidbit I noticed:
Doug's "serious" acting between Demo Reel and The Review Must Go On are far different. In the former, it feels so scripted and the delivery feels like it's supposed to be resentful but not really convincing at all like Emily stated. But in the latter, there's a lower, slower vocal register and a reserved but darker undertone to Doug's acting that portrays his hesitancy surprisingly well. What I love about this is that in the latter, Doug's nightmare of becoming The Critic again IS what he's genuinely feeling, and so the experiences that create that frustration translate because that acting is coming from lived experience and emotions rather than a character.
Make of that what you will.
It was a real “Say the line, Bart” moment for him. I believe that video was him killing Doug and allowing Critic to take full control. He surrendered to the thing he tried to outgrow
@@zachflag6506 truly the moment Doug became Heisenberg
So essentially, his serious acting in “The Review Must Go On” is better because he’s not actually acting in it.
This is one of the reasons why despite being iffy about everything else Doug has done, I do still like The Review Must Go On.
Doug Walker's humor has taken the exact same arc as Seth McFarland's. With both Family Guy and Nostalgic Critic, the jokes used to be FAST. They followed one after the other and were sharp and witty, and if one didn't work, it was over with quickly so it wasn't too painful. But then they started to be dominated by longer and longer cuttaway sketches that had nothing to do with anything and were filled with awkward anti-humor.
Seth made Ted and A Million Ways To Die In The West which are hilarious
@@carybeweary7209 A Million Ways to Die in the West is most assuredly not hilarious.
It's the writters fault, not Seth's.
@@carybeweary7209 Ted is literally just stolen jokes for two hours.
I like mcfarland’s The Orville.
Also the fact Doug did not consider for even a moment that all the other content creators on his site might be hit hard by him surprise-cancelling the website's main draw shows how much he cares about other people.
He was arrogant and incompetent enough to think that he could just replace the nostalgia critic with demo reel and every fan would just stay and watch. I don't think you can call him a bad person for that however. Maybe he thought that demo reel would be even more successful because he had more passion to work on it than nostalgia critic, therefore the switch being good for everyone working for the site. He was delusional, sure, but negligent towards the other creators, doubt it.
@@ellipsoidi Oh you can call him bad for other reasons. Like voting to fire their HR person a day after her surgery, or knowing about Jew Wario's sinister side and doing nothing, or keeping as Producer a man who apparently repeatedly lewdly harassed content creators, or that time he burst out laughing when told his cast and crew of 40 ish people filming in the DESERT need water.
Or him basically making people spend extra time while on set filming his anniversary movies to record crossovers to make CA even more ad revenue to make up for the fact they had to be given accomodations to sleep in while filming Doug's anniversary movies.
@@WeirdWonderful thanks for the lore dump but I was just referring to him switching shows suddenly.
Considering how HARD it is to gather a solid fanbase/viewers on YT, just up and drop his main draw to his channel was crazy selfish.
Everything I've seen seems to suggest it's less maliciousness and more that Doug's just a fucking idiot! He's beyond arrogant and doesn't even consider that the stuff he's doing might not be a good way to handle things. And from one perspective, I can kind-of understand? He's a big internet personality doing a weekly show, it makes sense that early on he'd get used to acting first and thinking later, and when that works you're going to get an ego from your fanbase over it. But this is so far after he dipped his toes into 'real' filmmaking, like.......
Did he just think Demo Reel was going to be such a big success that it wouldn't matter? Or was he just so blinded by the idea of moving on that he never considered there'd be consequences for trying to drop his biggest project for something new? Because I can easily see both of these being true!
You're so right about the fact that part of the reason everything looks so shitty is because Doug never leans in to the fact that they have no budget. The movie Tangerine is shot exclusively on iphone 5s, and even though this was because of budget reasons, it also helps to create this intimate, fly-on-the-wall feeling and matches the gritty enviornment the characters live in. It makes the story better. Every time I see something Doug Walkers made it feels like he's trying to emmulate a big-budget production, and it just never works
Aren't like some of the mist cult-classic films made on a shield string budget? Blair witch, cloverfield I believe was, district 9, and I think chronicle was as well as many others
I mean, he's also just flat-out an inept filmmaker, so I don't think it matters what his budget is. Even if he had $10 million, it's highly unlikely he would make anything watchable.
@@danielshore1457 Only The Blair Witch Project had a low budget (between $200.000 and $750.000). The others you mentioned had something between $15 million and $35 million, which is not that low in comparison to what Blair or Doug Walker had
To paraphrase Red Dwarf, this man is only guilty of being Doug Walker. That is his crime, and it is also his punishment.
Oh god, he is a rimmer
g a s p
I think that quote fits Spoony way more.
I mean rephrased to be about Spoony, I don't mean that Spoony's crime is being Doug Walker.
Ah, Red Dwarf: as shows written by two guys called Rob & Doug go, that’s one that’s still fun to go back and watch.
Ignoring Channel Awesome's scummy history as a company, what I think Doug needed for this series was a real crew. He needed to do what someone like Tomska (Thomas Ridgewell) does, and get directors and writing partners. He also needed to actually DO some filmmaking courses. Not necessarily film school for years, but a few workshops at the absolute minimum. The guy thinks to this day he and his friends can do it all themselves and it'll be great, but Doug's fundamentally untalented and incurious. He refuses to truly grow, yet insist to all he's getting better with every project.
But with every vanity project crap he produced, his work reveals greater sloppiness, lack of self awareness, and shallowness.
Thing is, he had that opportunity. Lots of people involved with channel awesome studied filmmaking professionally. Lindsay Ellis has said that when she tried to offer him suggestions to improve the crossover movies, he would ignore her or brush it off.
@@marias-i3333 yeah that's what I mean. I cribbed a bit from Dan Olson there because he put it so eloquently; Douglas is fundamentally incurious.
He doesn't want to hear how things can be done better. He's so arrogant that he thinks he already knows best. That which he does not know, he thinks he can learn on the job. But he's wrong, and his work is still bottom tier garbage.
thomas ridgewell is about as much of a narcissistic self absorbed egoist as doug walker is, the only difference between them is that thomas has a bit more natural talent and has managed to find a style that's relatively hard to replicate
@@richardvlasek2445 There's that, and the fact Ridgewell is aware of his faults and actively works to try to better himself. He fucks up, makes stupid mistakes and has alienated several friends, but he attempts to make amends and admit to his issues openly.
He also doesn't insist that he's talented to everyone and doesn't try to do it all himself. The guy's admitted he's good at getting other, more talented folks around him to help work on the sketches.
Finally, Ridgewell went to film school, did media studies and has a Uni degree. Walker doesn't have shit. He just makes it up as he goes along, which is fine for some, but Walker has no real talent at all, yet thinks he can do it without help.
@@marias-i3333 I have since learned that Doug actually did film school basically. He minored in film study at college.
So he really is just incompetent and there is no getting better as a director for him because he just doesn't have it in him.
I’m so happy you brought up how much tv tropes simps for Doug Walker. There’s been points where I feel like some of the pages related to him are written BY him.
I mean there’s an entire page named after Big Lipped Alligator Moment. On the other hand, the Super Villain Shuffle is no longer listed as a moment of awesome lol
@@henrynelson9301 The best part is the explanation for why the Super Villain Shuffle was removed is, "The super villain shuffle song is forgotten for a reason: it sucks."
@@henrynelson9301 Hahaha yeah i went to the site this morning to read about it and boom gone, i wonder if this video is the reason of that
@@ironmaster6496 it was actually a week after the video came out. Like the other guy said, the person who removed it just said “The super villain shuffle song is forgotten for a reason: it sucks.”
A lot of the simping for Doug Walker came about in TVTropes pages during like early 2010s (hell Web Originals in trope pages tend to be filled with CA people and Doug Walker), nowadays a lot of the Doug Walker content/trope examples are a lot more curated and you'd rarely see people whole hog simping for him outside of old un-updated trope pages (i.e: The Awesome Moment part of Supervillain Shuffle before someone probably realized it shouldn't be there anymore and edited it out).
I'm completely obsessed with content about NC, because it was my first heartbreak in terms of being disappointed with something you admired. I got into NC as a grown ass woman when I was horribly depressed and those videos kept me company and made me happy when nothing else would, so when I heard about the change the channel movement, it was like I have been married for years and suddenly discovered my spouse have had a secret family this whole time. I felt like shit for WEEKS, I couldn't even hear about NC, but then it all became anger and would consume any midia talking shit about NC (I know it all sounds super dramatic but I was at such a low point in my life). Years later, I'm more chill about it, but still every time I see a new video on the subject, I revive everything and I can't look away. Amazing video!
Hey hey I also got into NC as a horribly depressed grown ass woman (well, 18, but still). Hate that for us!
Even though the production quality was always garbage and in hindsight I can see the major glaring sexism/racism/etc. issues, it was a real comfort series. Maybe it was because of the poor production quality that it felt like having fun watching a friend’s video.
I feel the exact same way.
@@alluneedislessthan3 Same here too. I got into it when I was 28 and was constantly sick in bed. His videos were entertaining and helped me feel better when I was suffering because they made me laugh and really, at the time, there was nothing else like TGWTG (that was worth watching), besides AVGN. Our options and tastes have greatly widened over the past 13 years and Doug is still using the same shtick. It's depressing. It's also maddening most of the stuff they did to their associates, so that's just another layer of disappointment. I can't watch those videos that made me happy anymore because I know now what he would eventually become.
It's nice to know about other grown ass women who felt a similar way! I always felt so silly for having such strong feelings about the whole thing back then. Thank you guys for sharing your experience!
I was 16, but I found it late when it was far past its prime, I think like 'season' 9? I was very depressed, and found one of the videos that gave me a few simple chuckles, that then went deeper until I became an obsessive fan, at the beginning, I mixed old and new reviews, so probably why I didn't notice just how crappy the quality was. Was a fan till I was 18 when the change the channel popped up and I reacted almost exactly as you're describing here.
Okay this is going to come across as extremely strange and solipsistic and full of tangents, but I'm *so* glad you've made this video. The points you brought up at the very end about Doug's ambition and creative drive is something I've been thinking about lately as a former TGWTG devotee now nearing the age Doug was when the Critic's popularity and the online community were in full swing.
He is so profoundly sad to me? This weird little cornerstone of my adolescence, someone who was - horrifyingly - an influence on my interests and humor, had some real passion and creative drive just like me, but was just kind of too foolish, too negligent to handle his position? I think about how he used to draw cartoons in some bits and even references his art in one of the Alice in Wonderland reviews (citing Tim Burton as an influence) and how he left all traces of that part of himself behind. I think about how he let the horrible treatment of employees and fans go unchecked, LITERAL ABUSE, likely because he wasn't affected by any of it, and he was living his dream.
And it makes me feel so weird that because of his reviews I began to dig deeper into actual film criticism, schools of thought devoted to breaking down ways of interpreting text and subtext and symbolism, authorial intent (and the death thereof), and from there began to explore social issues in order to better understand others. Art is interpretation and Good Art asks you to engage meaningfully in that way and to try to empathize with its subjects. All those hours I spent reading theory (at risk of sounding like that Rick & Morty copypasta, I know I'm a huge nerd who needs to touch more grass), learning to listen to and understand voices different from myself (a dumb teenager) were springboarded by this miserable, little screaming goblin man I found funny when I was 16, whose community turned on him and killed his dream, possibly even being his divine punishment for the treatment of those who trusted him?
Something something your idols are but men in flesh and thus fallible creatures, idk. I have had some altering substances and got kind of emotional because it felt nice to know someone else wasted precious time philosophizing about the fucking Nostalgia Critic.
Check out Quinton Reviews. He has a great video about Doug Walker.
Some of the least-meaningful things out there can be surprisingly good insights into culture, history, even people in general. There's less self-awareness and so people don't know what they're revealing about themselves. It's the whole joke in Garth Mahrenghi's Darkplace but this time for real this is who this guy truly is.
@@BiggestCorvid Oddly enough, I think Quinton Reviews videos can be very... Mean on their topics. Like a certain disdain that I felt from him when he talked about Doug Walker and specially Linkara. But that may be just me.
I'm totally with you. Do you remember him mentioning being in Forbes at one point? I don't wanna mythologize, especially when other voices need to be raised in history, but as a historical narrative, you're right. It's tragic and fascinating.
@@iankernohan3874 "this guy is somehow revolutionizing an industry and breaking all the rules," almost inevitably ends in, "the leader, hailed as visionary, harassed and intimidated people while violating labor laws and civil rights."
Fun fact: this video has more views than any actual Demo Reel upload.
The Evangelion analogy is actually even more revealing, because Eva, like.../isn't/ a deconstruction of the mecha genre. Mecha has known putting kids in war machines is bad since the start, that's what OG Gundam is /about/. Anno made what was both a new spin on the genre and true to its existing strengths. Walker is, like, the polar opposite of that. "Movies are bad, and I'm smarter than them!"
I'd like to point out that just because X is addressed in a foundational work of a genre doesn't mean that X played straight can't become a staple of that genre. Genre-defining works tend to be thoughtful (because you need to be good on _some_ level to inspire a whole genre, and that generally requires thoughtfulness), but genre fiction tends to include a lot of thoughtless crap.
It can even happen to individual series, not just genres. Rocky and Rambo were both pretty dark character portraits, but the sequels just leaned straight into fun movie violence.
I don't think Gundam is really the kind of show Evangelion is subverting - it seems more in line with a twist on the "Super Robot" subgenre of mech anime like Mazinger Z. Both Evangelion and Gundam are deconstructions of that in different ways, with Gundam recasting superhero-like mechs as more grounded weapons in a serious war drama, while Evangelion directly flips Super Robot elements (alien enemies as monsters of the week, the abandoned child who becomes humanity's last hope, the seeming sentience of the mechs, the hot-blooded rival, etc.) into a sometimes lovecraftian psychodrama. Whether or not other series had already deconstructed the Super Robot genre and become more dominant in our view of mech anime (as Gundam certainly did), I think Evangelion still functions as a response to those earlier Super Robot shows.
Demo Reel was still bad though, no argument there.
@@drpibisback7680 I think my issue with people saying this is really that it's always people who have little to no familiarity with mecha anime throwing out these claims of "subversion" to a genre they don't actually even know but automatically dismiss. The statement "unlike most mecha anime, this one focuses more on the human aspect rather than the big robots" is kind of a meme in the mecha community because it makes eyes roll. There's this sort of obsession with "subversion"/"deconstruction" within western anime fans that Japanese people just don't really care about and don't even really see/intend, and in the case of mecha anime, it ends up feeling like there's a condescending attitude towards mecha anime. Like you get the feeling that in their subconscious, they're thinking "Evangelion is good, but that's specifically because it's unlike the other childish mecha anime I would never watch!". Of course, people familiar with the genre understand that there isn't really all that much "subversion" or "deconstruction", it's just a different flavour of the same genre, with many of the aspects always having been present anyway. Some fans even dismiss the concept of "real robot" because it isn't really that significant: Yoshiyuki Tomino didn't create "real robot" to stand out or subvert anything, it was simply a different type of mecha. And just like Doug Walker shows here, you can't create with cynicism and distaste: Tomino also made super robots before that with just as much passion. And guess what, some of those were really dark.
But this also gets to another point: real robot/super robot doesn't influence tone or subject matter either, another reason why some mecha fans don't really care about the differentiation. This means that the only difference between real robot and super robot is that... I guess the real robot is slightly more realistic. Really, thinking about it this way makes it tough to find a concrete difference between the two. It's not even like real robots are realistic, they're just A BIT more realistic, because they STILL don't make any sense. And fans of mechas like the "two types" of robots for the exact same reason: seeing a cool big robot move and use cool attacks is fun. But in terms of subject matter and tone, there's nothing concretely differentiating the two. You can have a lighthearted "real robot" series as well as a dark and traumatic "super robot" series showing the children piloting the robots getting broken by it, that's not a concept invented or even popularised by Evangelion. And that's fine because Evangelion, unlike popular western interpretation, was not really particularly trying to be subversive, and even if it was, honestly, what a fucking boring idea! That would suck! Why are western fans so obsessed over feeling smart cause their show is "subversive"? It's not smart, it's trite as hell. It's literally the Doug Walker attitude we're meant to be making fun of here, "Movies are bad, and I'm smarter than them!" while understanding nothing. Being really cynical while being uneducated while looking for a reason to feel smart. Just enjoy the damn show, it being a mecha anime isn't a blight that must always be followed by a disclaimer that it's not like the other mecha shows. Yes, it is like the other mecha shows.
Sorry if I sound like I'm yelling at you, I'm not pissed at you specifically or anything. It's just the thought of Evangelion fans and western audiences' obsession with subversion that gets me riled up for some reason. It really is funny that an Evangelion analogy was chosen for this video because it perfectly analogues Doug Walker's unwarranted cynicism towards movies.
Puting teenagers/kids in mechs is a stupid trope and there is nothing clever in "deconstructing it"
According to the Not So Awesome document, Phelan Porteous joked about Demo Reel on his twitter (specifically in saying that there would be a big reveal in his web series that he was actually Sub-Zero) and he was asked to personally apologize to Doug Walker. If that doesn't speak volumes concerning Doug's ego, nothing will.
fucking unbelievable...
To be fair, wasn’t it that Mike Machaud (or whatever his name is) guy who generally has a massive history in the document of... just being a weirdo and douchenozzle in general?
I’m not suggesting Doug doesn’t have his own garbage he needs to own up to, but if I recall correctly, I don’t think it was Doug who specifically asked Phelan to apologize to him. If anything, wasn’t Doug confused on that whole situation?
Correct me if I’m wrong on any of this. I haven’t read/listened to the document in a while.
@@keybyss98 IIRC The document only stated that Phelan was asked to apologize to Doug, it could have been on the behest of Michaud or even Robert Walker, but I do not recall if either of those were in the document.
@@keybyss98 Yeah, Douchebag gets all the blame just cause he's the face of the channel, but others such as Robin hood and Mike Ike are also responsible.
@@keybyss98 In the document Doug just seems negligent, off in his own world and completely oblivious to what his colleagues were thinking and feeling, to the point where it sometimes comes across like he's deliberately keeping himself ignorant of those things, all of which is kind of inexcusable if you're ostensibly the face of the company and very close to the top of the organisation. Also the whole "cover up the fact that a former staff member is a sex offender and even make a loving video tribute to them despite knowing full well what they did" thing.
"His idea of jokes a lot of time are just to have characters make pop culture references..."
Sounds like he would make a great writer for _Family Guy._
The difference is that Family Guy never claimed to be a review show or be taken too seriously. When it wants to be taken seriously, it stops with the references.
Back in the 2000s that's what humour 'was'. So glad we've outgrown it.
Tbh I think it’s unfair on Family Guy to compare it to something like the NC. Family Guy, especially modern Family Guy (although even the pre-cancellation seasons were hit and miss and best), is undeniably awful, but NC, taken as a “series” fails on a level so basic I don’t think there’s even a word for what it doesn’t manage to achieve since a piece of media achieving it is so fundamentally expected. Idk really even how to word this so my comment is probably confusing but hopefully you at least FEEL what I mean even if you can’t quite get what it is.
This is worse than that time I was the nostalgia critic.
@@zoewells3160 I don't think his content was a failure at all until he quit the NC the first time. He helped pioneer the genre. Sure, most people grew out of liking his content and his content more or less evolved in a worse direction but I also think people give him way too much shit for attempting to change his format. Frankly, some of his early NC episodes after Demo Reel were genuinely some of his best stuff. That's not saying a ton, but you can tell his jokes had some development. Family Guy is barely any better than a show like Nostalgia Critic. It's reference based humor, it appeals to people up to a point and then becomes incredibly annoying. That's why Family Guy used to be cherished by so many and is now hated. I don't see Doug Walker's shows having any worse or different an arc than 99% of TV shows that were successful. They started out fresh, grew stale and eventually the characters aren't remotely the same as what the show started with and everyone who loved the show initially begins to hate the changes and moves on. People just don't want to move on from Nostalgia Critic's old content, that's what I believe anyway. I don't like his new content but I don't go to every one of his videos and tell everyone he needs to change shit for ME.
Yet to some degree, you have people who successfully keep up their show longer than anyone else. AVGN is a fair comparison for that, he's still going, at a slower pace, but most people still love his newer content as much as his older stuff. I think his new stuff is a lot better, personally. But you'll still find people who say he's too politically correct or some other bullshit that they don't like and feel he should go back to doing to please them individually. I'm just saying Doug Walker, Nostalgia Critic, whatever you want to call him, is not unique and is no worse than a lot of TV shows and internet creators. Spongebob, Aqua Teen Hunger Force, Family Guy are all a few examples of shows I can think of that I adored early on and hated their later content. Very few shows can maintain consistency in both characters and tone, as well as narrative. I can think of Futurama as one where the main cast is mostly the same in the later seasons as in the early seasons. That's why a lot of shows need to die eventually, that's why Nostalgia Critic probably should have died and ended. Now he's so out of ideas, his content is awful.
Doug's incompetency on filmmaking is even surpassed by his cheapskatery. He bought the most affordable LED lights for his "dream show" resulting in horrible horizontal banding in those talking head setups. His goto background is a white wall and his mortal enemy is a window behind his subject at noon. Also, after almost 20 years of filming, he and his team are yet to comprehend the concept of the 180° rule, something so basic that any entry level youtube video about cinematography most certainly covers it.
I have NO filmmaking background and only the barest hint of a theater background (and only as a performer). I had never, ever heard of a "180 rule" until literally the day I read the CTC document. But goddamn, after only a few minutes of thinking about it and firing up a TH-cam video for further explanation, I got it. It seems like people have been trying to drill the concept into Doug's head for years and he's just unable or unwilling to even entertain the concept.
The production value of his content is so poor and its inexcusable to be honest. Cheapskate was a very accurate description of it. He's been making content for so long yet the lighting is still so bad, it's baffling.
@@user-jb7tq7ko7e Doug has committed the cardinal sin of artistry: complacency. He's 100% convinced that because his amateur filming and MS paint effects were successful in the early 2000s he doesn't need to improve them in any way. The only way he's really grown and changed as an artist over the years now is his increasingly parody-focused style, which is more borne of his desire to be a filmmaker and not a critic (but being unable to actually make anything decent) than him actually attempting to improve on the nostalgia critic.
ah yes, the gremlins in the comments love to criticize doug's film making when they don't understand anything about film making. you're just copying and pasting someone else's unoriginal comment at this point just to justify your hatred of doug walker. maybe you should get a life
@@garretdrake2347 I don't know about the other "gremlins" but I am a filmmaker and have been working in productions for the last 15 years as DOP, cinematographer and editor. I'm not copy pasting anything, I'm not as lazy as Doug.
I'll be real, the way you cut the "Batman being afraid of Mario" joke made it seem way funnier than the full 2 minutes
The crowning moment of awesome is now off the TVtropes page lol
It's such a small thing in a sea of others, but seeing the faux-SWAT guy try to threateningly cock his handgun at 51:15, only for it to hold open on an empty magazine, demonstrating that the gun is definitely unloaded and clear is *chef's kiss*
Not going to lie, in something more competently put together that would've actually been hilarious.
What I think really makes the Elizabeth Huffman and Jake Lloyd thing even more despicable is that Doug's character is so obviously supposed to be a stand in for himself. Doug has always had this persecuted artist complex where he believes that any criticism of his work is a persecution of him. In doing this, he is equating two very real life tragedies, one of which involved a suicide, to his situation as a terrible online creator who refuses to put in the most bare minimum of effort into his craft.
He has always considered himself a martyr, especially the first time he got taken off of TH-cam.
@@TheLowBrassDude him and tj kirk both do that,if you criticize and you make your fame off of it, then its very hypocritical for them to say "how dare you criticize me?" when its done to you....as the narrator said, just doing insulting and "edgy" jokes doesnt make it funny...like u can make jokes without making fun of someone, many shows ...i think doug is a edgelord jokester type of guy...that type of comedy can be good if there's a punchline,
george carlin is a good example of edgy comedy with a purpose, hes pointing out flaws of society while hes cracking jokes so you not only laugh but you acknowledge hes saying the truth....
what doug and many comedies do is crude humor just to be crude and its very lazy and its been getting called out
29:33
"They decide to feed Rebecca Sugar"
Yeah that line confused me because I already for got the characters' names and thought we were talking about the creator of Steven Universe now
I'd feel more sorry for Walker if he wasn't so complicit in the Change The Channel controversy. He's the sad clown wallowing in a purgatory created by his own hubris, but whatever pity I can muster for the guy is overwhelmed by a grander sense of mocking contempt and thinking his current position as a form of karma more than anything else.
Watch Diregentlemans look at The Review Must Go On. It is definitely what you’re talking about.
you guys really like to try and demonize doug even though he's done absolutely nothing wrong. perhaps you should get over it.
@@garretdrake2347 no matter how many comments you make defending him, he's not going to thank you. Save your time and touch grass
@@garretdrake2347 despite him not doing anything wrong, he also Did Nothing when it came to the abuse at the hands of his coworkers, especially since he had the power to put his foot down. So, he did do something wrong by doing nothing and sometimes that can be pretty bad.
@@stardoogalaxie9314 he didn't know about it. you can't do something if no one comes to you.
Doug Walker's humor is literally like those awful spoof movies from the late 2000's like Epic Movie. It's pop culture references for the sake of pop culture references. Like the Randy Newman "joke" is a reference to an old Family Guy joke, itself a pop culture reference. I believe there was a quote from the "Not So Awesome" document that stated something to the effect of that all of Doug's jokes were just pop culture references because he thought just the references in themselves were funny, even though they weren't really jokes.
His is the disaster movie's humor mixed with Looney tunes, and joke books: offensive, cartoony, and stupid.
It’s especially disappointing because of how he previously critiqued these kinds of parodies, which are mostly made up of references. th-cam.com/video/dj3ZOF6A3MM/w-d-xo.html
I really dislike when he reviews a movie that is only I theatres and the whole video is just like a long version of Demo Reel.
you clearly haven't watched very many of his videos if you think that's his humor
@@garretdrake2347 I might not have watched any of his videos since The Wall but I used to watch his videos and that’s exactly his humour.
@@garretdrake2347 Thats his humor, cope
The Supervillain Shuffle is no longer listed as a "crowning moment of awesome" on TV Tropes.
Society
Literally 1984
Aww
The snake that eats its own tail.
And the removal straight up lists it’s justification as “it sucks” and yet no Demo Reel fan has sought to change that yet
Here Ill finish the Arby's joke for him.
"Wait stop, we cant go in there!"
"What is it, guards? Traps? Did you get food poisoning once? A really mean sign that says keep out???"
"No, worse. We havent purchased film rights for the location yet."
and scene, leaving plenty of room for their villains to develop a little and for the deli fresh stakes to be raised.
The great thing about Doug Walker is how holistically awful everything is. From a still frame you can tell how awful the colors and lighting are. With the audio muted you can tell the pacing is terrible and everybody's body language is discordant and identical. The actors' facial expressions in isolation are dreadful, especially Doug's default empty-eyed rictus grin. I haven't visited the channel in years but I wouldn't be surprised if the video descriptions were also awful in a way which fractally reflected the awfulness of these other elements. From one frame he gives you a holistic understanding of how bad the writing and tone must be. And they are!
Doug is a case study in wrongheadedness and mediocrity, and he leaves no stone turned.
This is something I noticed while putting the video together, yeah. Like it was so hard to edit clips to use because so much of Demo Reel is just... very very same-y shots, for scenes that are mostly overwritten dialogue and prolonged jokes, and it becomes clear how little he's actually using the visual medium and its properties for his benefit. It's bizarre. You even just begin to notice the difference in audio quality going from his (presumably) on-camera mic footage vs any sort of voice over or content you edit against it. Weird.
@@LadyEmilyPresents Yeah, I kept thinking about you having to pore over this stuff and come up with meaningful commentary, and every time you'd say "Ok, here's something I didn't want to bring up, but now I have to," I'd think "Geez how deep did she go into this rabbit-hole? Did she come back the same?" Never has more blood been wrung from a smaller stone.
I don't mean to rag on Doug for his failures of perspective and talent, even though they ultimately combine into something that makes me viscerally uncomfortable in a way few things do. I don't expect him to say, go work at a tire place or something. I guess it's like you say, the NC is a prison of his own making, and really I just feel pity for him, and especially for the actors he hires. Him trying to break out into narrative filmmaking is like when an okapi breaks out of their zoo enclosure thinking there's somewhere for them to go.
Anyway, thanks for remembering it so we didn't have to.
@@LadyEmilyPresents Some more thoughts by my part as I keep on coming back to this, the underlying problem is Doug Walkers content in TH-cam terms is not unlike when you stumble across a twenty year old HTML website that is still being maintained to this day...in other words painfully dated and too much effort to scroll through!
For someone who became a major TH-cam content provider the quality of his material from camera to sound through effects is little better than what we saw in the early years of TH-cam, there are smaller content providers who produce content that is vastly superior production quality wise and some have moved onto bigger things. The tools to make high quality content are there for us all yet Doug appears to be totally uninterested in upping his game. Even worse we know Channel Awesome has sunk money on expensive kit yet you wouldn't know watching what they produce which feels slapdash and rushed but as you say not in a charming way. Yet Doug and his crew swan about as if they are somehow modern day Stanley Kubrick producing high quality content in the insufferable lengthy behind the scenes videos they produce for all their content as if they are somehow showing major craft in what they are doing.
Compare Channel Awesome to something like Viva La Dirt League or The Corridor Crew to see what can be done in a professional manner on a limited budget.
@@Fedaykin24 you summed it up pretty well. I thought about Captain Dissilusion and how he also uses greenscreens and aftereffects (or something similar) a lot. But one can tell that he puts in some serious efforts to make it look as good as possible. How can channel awesome use these techniques for so long and not get any better at it?
doug makes better content than any of the people who tried (and failed) to cancel him.
“And I’d like to thank my patrons, Sarah... Zed. Z? Zed? I don’t know.”
*Sarah Z will remember that*
What does the z stand for?
@@nra3zehuti781 Zee
“The Channel Awesome Trilogy and Doug Walker as a person was never really great as we remembered” is my favorite sub genre of TH-cam videos. This and Oneyplays running gag of ripping on him. It feels like therapy for those who were once a fan of Nostalgia Critic back in the day. It’s almost like the aftermath of escaping from a cult.
The Oneyplays bits about him are literally why I started watching Oneyplays after not watching Let's Plays for like a decade since JonTron left Game Grumps 😅
It's weird though because the impression chris and the boys give is a sort of backhanded enjoyment for stuff by channel awesome
@@blackout295 Chris himself said it's a love hate relationship.
This comment made me realize this really is a strange little subgenre and I love it
This is my favourite TH-cam genre too, check out the ralphthemoviemaker videos too
As Dan Olson so accurately said: He's youtube's own Tommy Wiseau.
Complete with the same unwillingness to learn how a camera works
"Since I basically lived off of these when I was eleven, trying to critique them is like going back to a Cartoon Network series you used to watch when you were nine."
I guess you could say it's difficult to critique because of your nostalgia. That you're a critic... with nostalgia.... a notalgic...... critic.......... okay I'll stop
"Far be it for me to be a critic of nostalgia .... Wait." ~ Oancitizen
There is some...Odd irony to that, really. The Nostalgia Critic is a show all about how things you liked as a kid often turn out to be kinda bad when viewed as an adult...And, now, the Nostalgia Critic, for lots of people IS something we liked as kids that turned out to be kinda bad when watched as an adult.
one thing that really made me uncomfortable during the demo reel finale is the appropriation of Jake Lloyd's story to make Doug's self insert more sympathetic. While the appropriated hartman backstory involves a more tragic overall real world occurance due to ending in her death, doug is, at least, not a part of that
but doug is, in no small part, a contributor to the continued online harrassment Lloyd suffered. a large one. mocking him being a frequent thing on the early nostalgia critic and was something doug almost encouraged in the fandom. for lloyd daring to be an actor cast in a bad movie.
and then doug snaps up this persons real story... to cast himself as the standin for the person he contributed to the sitation for. its just... its just skeezy, and uncomfortable, and it makes doug seem like someone who doesnt think about anyone but themselves, because even if you now regret those actions, using this real persons harrassment as a basis for why you need sympathy, despite being part of the harrassment, is just ugh
Jake Lloyd was at Columbia College Chicago at around the same time Malcolm Ray was there, which makes me wonder if the ONLY REASON AT ALL that it occurred to Doug that Jake Lloyd was maybe mistreated by the media (including his own videos) was that Malcolm maybe mentioned it to him after they started working together. Because Doug comes across as such a self-absorbed person that I don't think he's capable of having an empathetic thought unless somebody else suggests that he have it.
Honestly, the "joker make up as whiteface" bit could have been really funny. Taxis stop for him when he's in the make up. Police don't bother him. He contemplates just wearing the joker make up for the rest of his life, I dunno. It's the seed of a joke
...Ok that sounds like a hilarious race joke. Why does that bring that grinch it's cause I'm green isn't it joke.
But even what you're describing would just be the "Eddie Murphy goes undercover as a white man" sketch from SNL, so either way, it's been done.
@@lanceturley7745 I mean yeah it's not a totally original joke but it would be different enough because this isn't "black man dressed as a white man" it's "Joker face make up is enough to enable white privilege." It's ridiculous enough to be different even if not entirely unique.
@@SteveRudzinski Okay, yeah. When you describe it that way, as "the not at all convincing Joker makeup is somehow still enough to get people to treat him better," that actually is a funny idea.
"Full Joker cosplay gets treated as more normal than being black" sounds like a Bojack Horseman B-plot
I cant stop thinking about the “Mario Scares me” joke and how it can be a potentially funny joke a la The Batman Lego movie style where Bruce is scared of Mario, not because of the video game but because Bruce saw the Anti Drug Mario PSA a tad too young and its plagued him since. I like to believe that Alfred would have to question him once and Bruce, all steely would go “Ill make them go to Hell before they die.” And Alfred would go, “Yes, Master Bruce.” But would give him a “would you like to talk about it” look and Bruce would promptly go “I’ll go change.” After like a beat or two of silence.
After watching the new Folding Ideas, The Algorithm suggested this. All hail The Algorithm.
i’ve never watched a video by channel awesome and i only know of doug walker and the nostalgia critic very vaguely, but i’m still willing to watch two hours of people talking about them because it’s so entertaining lmao
SAME!! 😂
P.s.: Check his Annihilation movie review as well
@@joselocalau123 This saves you far more time and energy because I've tried and it's crazy, I was there for things like ask a ninja and freddyw's stuff etc etc, stick figures on crack lol
It's amazing how much content creators have evolved and some havent
Wait SAME
Yup
So, Doug has now been the "new" NC for a longer time than he ever was the "original." Time laughs at my aching bones.
A *significantly* longer time, too. Like, almost double the length.
@@videogamenostalgia *sniff*
10 years being the new one. He was the old one for just 5
It's worth noting that around 2007, Doug uploaded a video where he quit his at-the-time hell job working as a custodian and made a big show out of it, as if he was done being held down by dull/uninteresting jobs that didn't go anywhere.
Funny how things come full circle.
lol he was a custodian…. Went from cleaning up garbage to creating garbage. Beautiful.
@@kg7219
James Cameron was a custodian too. A job doesn't define you.
Michael Bay makes shit, too.
And he's a film rockstar because of it.
@@jekblom123Michael Bay had some winners. You tell me you weren't thoroughly entertained with Nicolas Cage pairing up with Sean Connery. Or Will Smith teaming up with Martin Lawrence.
This video is such a love letter to demo reel
Man, I used to be a big fan of Critic during the time when he killed the Critic and started demo reel. I am Russian who was mostly watching videos with subtitles, and my English was not very good, but I tried to watch Demo Reel anyway. It was so bad that I thought that it was my fault for not getting it. I thought, I probably don't get it because I don't know English well enough. But nope, it really was that bad
Why are you me? Whenever i didnt like NC's stuff i just chalked up to not understanding english very well
Christ imagine being so bad people from other countries think it was just lost in translation
@Deniz Metin T. There weren't. People used to reupload them with subtitles in different languages. It was cool for those who didn't grasp English all that well, but CA creators were usually very against this, claiming they were taking revenue away from them.
The backstory of the last episode is the equivalent of Elisa Lam being used in YIIK as a character. Both are used purely plot devices to make you feel bad for the main character without handling the real life tragedy with any respect
YIIK was definitely going through my head while writing that section. It’s so off-putting to blatantly pull from specific personal tragedies like that, especially when it’s not the main focus of the work itself.
@@LadyEmilyPresents What happened with YIIK? I've never heard of it.
@@jay-white YIIK is an RPG released a while back that was mired in a variety of controversies. The biggest of which was that it featured a character who was clearly inspired by the real life person Elisa Lam, who was only in the story to give the main character motivation to go on the game’s adventure.
If you hadn’t heard of it, it’s worth looking into the discourse around it... YIIK is a fascinating black hole to get sucked into, so long as you don’t make the mistake I did, and actually try to play it.
Edit: Lam. Thanks autocorrect
@@lancerguy3667 Thanks for the info
@@lancerguy3667 NOOOOOOO SO IT ISNT JUST ME WHO STARTED TRYING TO PLAY IT CAUSE I WAS FASCINATED BY HOW MUCH IT FUCKED UP
As a former NC fan, the rise and fall of Doug Walker, from movie critic to “the worst filmmaker of his generation” is fascinating. It’s almost karmic.
Anyway, loved this video. A bit of constructive criticism, there were times when the narration was too fast, and I had to rewind to understand what was said. Other than that, great. The NGE reference was perfect.
The fact you watched Demo Reel is one of the most heroic things I've ever seen a youtuber do. Bless you.
I used to think Nostalgia Critic was just a character that kinda worked in the early days of TH-cam and only stuck around because Doug didn't have any other successful ideas. I didn't realize it was THIS bad. The fact that nearly ten years has passed since Demo Reel and Doug still hasn't been able to move on from this character is just depressing
"This does get complicated when Donnie fucks Egoraptor from Game Grumps..."
This line of summary alone begs several questions. Also, I literally spat tea on my floor and am holding Doug Walker personally liable.
And why Doug Walker? Arin can do so much better smh
@@eadlynjune look, you can only pine for your curly haired former stoner coworker for so long. you gotta get your nut out somehow!
@@eadlynjune yeah lol i have so little respect for Arin (and so much 'spit-on-the-floor disgust') but its still kinda weird they interacted at all
@@KOTEBANAROT what did arin do? I've been out of the loop on him.
This was even way before Arin had Game Grumps. When he was just Egoraptor, that guy with the cool voice who did animations about game parodies.
Wow. I didn't make it past the first episode, but Dupree's backstory in the LAST episode? Really, Mr. Walker? As flawed as the animated Titanic trilogy was, you pointed out that its biggest cardinal sin was its mockery of the deaths of all the people who went down with the ship... And THIS is how you address these issues with these actors? Poor taste, man.
That closing monologue about 'The Nostalgia Critic' being Walker's purgatory... Whew... Masterful.
Heeeey! Funny to see you here, man.
Oh hello 👋😅
I think that one of the central things about pre-reboot Nostalgia Critic is that it had its niche: Children's movies from the 80s and 90s that most of us who were around Doug's age or slightly older or younger might remember vaguely and have a weird curiosity about not shared by the rest of society, but realized they were kinda dumb and didn't mind seeing someone getting really angry at them while trying to recount their plots. Also they weren't run into the ground yet. (Yup, I watched that old German Columbus movie back in the day, but no one until Doug was talking about it). This made his stuff come off as more groundbreaking because it was original observations, by the very nature that it had to be because no one else was talking about the relevant films as compared to the Nolan Batman films which College Humor had already picked apart.
It's even in the name.
So much media gets made, and a lot of it gets forgotten. That's always the case, but in the case of children's media you've got lots of stuff kids will see at a young & impressionable age and have burned into their brains that then just gets... forgotten.
I'm pretty sure that I saw a film in theatres as a child called "Help I'm a Fish" but I haven't seen or heard it referenced anywhere in the world since that day. Was it even real? I guess I could look it up, but "how long can I continue to live my life until someone spontaneously confirms or denies the existence of 'Help I'm a Fish'" is just a game I'm playing with myself now.
There's a niche out there for a "nostalgia critic" that does retrospectives like that! It's interesting to see reviewers go back & dissect old media you absorbed before you were old enough to be media-literate, and break them apart like Gordon Ramsey with a fork.
@@Ninjat126 Some people have reviewed that movie
You did an awesome job on this! I used to watch Channel Awesome so much back in the day, but even I had no interest in Demo Reel
I watch your stuff and now I keep seeing you in comments sections everywhere I go 👀
True, but which fossil did you take? Just asking to help the youtube algor...wait wrong video.
Same. I watched one episode of Demo Reel and just like that my days on Channel Awesome was over x)
@@thomaswinwood What's "MDB"?
@@thomaswinwood Is that the username of someone on TH-cam?
I appreciate the boldness of comparing Evangelion to literally anything associated with the Nostalgia Critic. But from the way you describe Demo Reel, it seems like a better comparison is to Moral Orel on Adult Swim.
The start of Orel was a crass, early South Park-esque simple satire of Evangelical Christianity and 50s Leave It to Beaver Americana where every episode was basically same joke of "look how hypocritical Christians are!" But over the course of the series, there is a marked shift away from that one-note structure and towards looking more deeply at character's backstories, interconnections with others, and the arcs of their lives.
By the end, it's a shockingly intense and nuanced psychodrama based around the quiet desperation and unspoken darkness at the heart of American small town life, to the point where they deliberately bring back the structure of the early episodes just to hammer home how that violent absurdity is not only now totally out of place, but actually the cause of immense trauma for everyone involved.
This is, of course, a fucking insane evolution. The fact that it didn't completely collapse into a tonedeaf mess is itself a testament to masterful writing and such intricate pacing that even a single episode out of place can destroy the whole thing (which Adult Swim actually did, greatly hobbling its effect for most viewers).
Needless to say, it was a narrow creative tightrope and required a whole team of writers and directors to pull off. The idea that Doug Fucking Walker thought he could thread the needle of "goofy comedy turns into serious character drama and social commentary" by himself as his first genuine narrative outing is a better joke than anything he could ever write himself.
i don’t have anything important to say. but the “i’ll remember it so you don’t have to” at the very beginning had me going apeshit let’s GOOOOOOO
It's honestly fascinating going back to Doug Walker, a fixture in my teenage years, and seeing just how weirdly bad his stuff was. It's not even like going back to an old show I loved as a kid, cause I tend to just not like those (or realize I wasn't smart enough to realize just how great it was when I first watched it) because his stuff, for as bad as it was, is pretty formative to me. Without Nostalgia Critic, I wouldn't have found creators like Super Eyepatch Wolf, Clemps, or Lady Emily and I probably wouldn't have started writing my own analytical essays. This is such a great deep dive on one of his more notorious projects because it doesn't just go "Ha, internet man not know what he's doing" but tries to understand why he made the decisions he did and what the show says about his worldview. This is honestly inspiring as a first effort.
I think Doug did so well because he was the only person who put out videos on a consistent basis, that touched on fairly basic media analysis. If you were a teenager with an interest in film and narrative, for a good few years Doug was really the main draw. Even Lindsay's early work is similarly basic with a chaotic upload schedule. Doug won out as the default through consistency and the sheer amount of content.
Its no a coincidence to me that once video essayists became established and began making consistent high quality film content, Doug's viewing figures have never recovered.