I had my own Artorigus Deck with Merlin and Morgana, funny to play but hard against meta decks. The decks you present here are very interesting and now that Camelot and Charles are in Master Duel I will give it a try. Your video and passion for this deck is awesome!
One that works like the link one charles would be cool. Using the rank 5 would be especially nice. A quick effect pop would make the most sense, but a quick effect bounce would be nice. Always thought it was a shame the xyz custanin wasn't a quick effect.
@@ivancazares129totally. Linking over rank 5 would trigger his effect to reborn and the equips would re-equip to the knight on field. If the link also got to equip from grave on summon you could get a full field of equips. Since Charles randomly got the ability to negate spell/traps the link arty should just negate summons at the cost of an equip as it's bonus effect. Probably hopt.
Always had a love for noble nights and tried desperately to make them work when I was learning the game. This was awesome to learn and I will absolutely be using this against a friend of mine.
The only "brick" you need to play to use Camelot is the old field spell, and it can grab it from hand, deck, or grave so it's more of a soft garnet. Also the search effect can get noble arms cards, meaning you can use it to search the equips without playing the vanilla. Also basically no one has mentioned that it can reborn the Rank 4 and 5 Artorigus and if you reborn the 4 and you have Excaliburn in grave, you can summon the rank 5 with it which counts as an XYZ summon and re equips, and leaves 1 Material for a monster pop. Camelot is actually insane protection, extension, and recursion.
Honestly, I am just infuriated with infernoble knights. I have been playing Noble knights since their release 2014 a deck that got me into Yu-Gi-Oh. It was fun and as a king Arthur fan was happy with the archetype, but with these new cards Noble knights were given something that no other deck was ever given, a reckon. The infernoble knights completely spit at the originals and yet demands the originals to work for them and the fact they aren't light or dark completely destroys the synergy of the original deck making Gwen pointless and the deck weirdly embarrassed of having equips and instead uses spell cards that pretend to be equips just to take advantage of Isolde. It just always felt like the deck was being a complete replacement and shaming anyone for trying to use the originals with them, they search for "fire warriors" as if the name "noble knight" is a plague, and even the new cards now just say "infernoble knights" which just hurts. Honestly I don't understand why Konami went so out of their way to tell my deck to die when they could have made this deck more versatile with the originals. And when Isolde was on the chopping block they made sure Infernoble knights had substitutes and we were left with a deck that at this point in time is completely unplayable. What a stab in the back.
Yeah always thought infernoble was lame they could have put that energy making them into good noble knight support but instead made it a spin off deck. If they really “needed” to go the synchro route they could have made them Ignoble knight the dark ones that already existed and were rarely used. Could have gave them a spotlight. The searching equips and other support could have been generic noble arms so they be searched and utilized both archetypes to be more synergistic together. They easily could have made 100% compatible support between the two and it would just be a choice of if you wanted to lean more into xyz or synchros or even hybridize both and would still all work cohesively together. And with Isolde Konami put a nail in her coffin by making her too generic. Should have made her 2 warriors at least 1 being a noble knight. Her summoning effect should have only been noble knights by sending noble arms. They made her a problem cause she’s been abused by “warrior decks” since she came out. But hopefully they can errata her someday or something so she can come off and still be good in her archetypal deck.
you have to find a way to play them together,this may mean not including every noble knight but also you dont have to use every infernoble knight out there they do complement each other if you can fit them together right
@@azzamandreas862 I made two noble knight decks, original and inferno and even the deflur deck fully made, so i like to say in confidence that I have a lot of experience of the deck. After trying and trying, the more it became clear that the original is obsolete. the equips don't matter for Charles and with the Charlemagne link, you have to make a big commitment to him cause they didn't make the infernoble monsters links (the link monster is proof that they regret it) My king Artoigus can't compete and it is just asking to be eliminated if I use the original noble knights. Charles is immediatly 3000 off the back i have to use 2 equips just to match him without his boosts, and as i said before the deck is embarassed of using equips even though that is what its suppose to be. and with more and more of the support now saying "Infernoble" it is such a uphill battle. and with the deflur lvl 10 banned my delfur deck just got obsoleted and there is no support to the og noble knights, Isolde is band and any cards that could help us focuses of fire warrior monsters. Konami made it truly sadly clear. we are forgotten, and the new deck doesnt need the original, just the grail. heck i went to tournaments and was angry that i was winning with a pure infernoble knight deck, I even had a draw against snake eyes. My King would have been easily destroyed, but Charles got me through it. I appreciate the comment but Konami yelled loud and clear.
I know it'll likely never happen but I would love a Noble Knight Dragon boss card (that is also treated as a warrior). Knights and dragons go hand in hand after all!
I like the list and examples. Im a huge fan of the og english nights. I just was wondering about your choice in last chapter of the noble knights. Its frustratingly not that searchable. Its not a noble arms card and almost all the other noble knight searchers say noble knight monster (except durendal which says fire warrior). In fact, the only noble card that i know can search it is ignoble knight of high laundsalin...after sending a monster to the grave by battle. If it were searchable i think it would have a really solid place in the deck as a card to just power through any interuptions. Konami, just admit you messed up and errata it to be a noble arms card! :p
Man i always thought that custennin should get a rank 5 xyz that u can summon on top of the rank 4 xyz and that gives him a quick effect bounce. Just some support that would give normal noble knights a chance in modern day.
Funny, no one mentions the main deck Roland and how it synergies with round table, as it search effect can activates during the end phase which can help search for an addition card, and how you can add it to the hand with the 3rd effect, and have a quick play equip and an extra search during the opponent’s end phase.
I liked that Noble Knights had 2 Ways of playing, going for the XYZ or going for the Synchro. But actually with the new support its much better the Synchro/Link path. I would like if they get something to keep the main cards playable and make It Synchro/XYZ with armament equiped. Now it's like summon negations, disruption and the fucking Baronne... Tired of same objectives
Honestly I hope they will get a tower at some point. Would be a really good deck but the t1 is just not good enough and it's super hard to play through disruptions while going 2nd
!["สนธิ" ห่วงมีขบวนการปกป้อง "ทนายตั้ม" : [THE MESSAGE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2GQNp3EoMc0/mqdefault.jpg)
I had my own Artorigus Deck with Merlin and Morgana, funny to play but hard against meta decks. The decks you present here are very interesting and now that Camelot and Charles are in Master Duel I will give it a try. Your video and passion for this deck is awesome!
We need a link one retrain of artorigus lmfao
Lmao, let's just give them a version of the genex link 1. But specify non fire noble knights
Yea facts!!
One that works like the link one charles would be cool. Using the rank 5 would be especially nice. A quick effect pop would make the most sense, but a quick effect bounce would be nice. Always thought it was a shame the xyz custanin wasn't a quick effect.
@@ivancazares129totally. Linking over rank 5 would trigger his effect to reborn and the equips would re-equip to the knight on field. If the link also got to equip from grave on summon you could get a full field of equips. Since Charles randomly got the ability to negate spell/traps the link arty should just negate summons at the cost of an equip as it's bonus effect. Probably hopt.
@@MonkeyFightTCGthe genes link one is honestly one of the most overpowered cards I’ve ever seen period… if it wasn’t a gene monster
Those card effects were nice.
This vid was great, your love for the deck really shines through.
Always had a love for noble nights and tried desperately to make them work when I was learning the game. This was awesome to learn and I will absolutely be using this against a friend of mine.
from recent testing Camelot , and sacread king have been a big help for me winning against fire kings.
Brooo your research is crazy, keep it up king!
Eyy glad to see the new field spell being useful
Interesting deck list! Been playing a Noble Infernoble build and there are for sure some ideas here I'm gonna snag.
The only "brick" you need to play to use Camelot is the old field spell, and it can grab it from hand, deck, or grave so it's more of a soft garnet. Also the search effect can get noble arms cards, meaning you can use it to search the equips without playing the vanilla. Also basically no one has mentioned that it can reborn the Rank 4 and 5 Artorigus and if you reborn the 4 and you have Excaliburn in grave, you can summon the rank 5 with it which counts as an XYZ summon and re equips, and leaves 1 Material for a monster pop.
Camelot is actually insane protection, extension, and recursion.
Honestly, I am just infuriated with infernoble knights. I have been playing Noble knights since their release 2014 a deck that got me into Yu-Gi-Oh. It was fun and as a king Arthur fan was happy with the archetype, but with these new cards Noble knights were given something that no other deck was ever given, a reckon. The infernoble knights completely spit at the originals and yet demands the originals to work for them and the fact they aren't light or dark completely destroys the synergy of the original deck making Gwen pointless and the deck weirdly embarrassed of having equips and instead uses spell cards that pretend to be equips just to take advantage of Isolde. It just always felt like the deck was being a complete replacement and shaming anyone for trying to use the originals with them, they search for "fire warriors" as if the name "noble knight" is a plague, and even the new cards now just say "infernoble knights" which just hurts. Honestly I don't understand why Konami went so out of their way to tell my deck to die when they could have made this deck more versatile with the originals. And when Isolde was on the chopping block they made sure Infernoble knights had substitutes and we were left with a deck that at this point in time is completely unplayable. What a stab in the back.
Yeah always thought infernoble was lame they could have put that energy making them into good noble knight support but instead made it a spin off deck.
If they really “needed” to go the synchro route they could have made them Ignoble knight the dark ones that already existed and were rarely used. Could have gave them a spotlight. The searching equips and other support could have been generic noble arms so they be searched and utilized both archetypes to be more synergistic together. They easily could have made 100% compatible support between the two and it would just be a choice of if you wanted to lean more into xyz or synchros or even hybridize both and would still all work cohesively together.
And with Isolde Konami put a nail in her coffin by making her too generic. Should have made her 2 warriors at least 1 being a noble knight. Her summoning effect should have only been noble knights by sending noble arms. They made her a problem cause she’s been abused by “warrior decks” since she came out. But hopefully they can errata her someday or something so she can come off and still be good in her archetypal deck.
you have to find a way to play them together,this may mean not including every noble knight but also you dont have to use every infernoble knight out there
they do complement each other if you can fit them together right
@@azzamandreas862 I made two noble knight decks, original and inferno and even the deflur deck fully made, so i like to say in confidence that I have a lot of experience of the deck. After trying and trying, the more it became clear that the original is obsolete. the equips don't matter for Charles and with the Charlemagne link, you have to make a big commitment to him cause they didn't make the infernoble monsters links (the link monster is proof that they regret it) My king Artoigus can't compete and it is just asking to be eliminated if I use the original noble knights. Charles is immediatly 3000 off the back i have to use 2 equips just to match him without his boosts, and as i said before the deck is embarassed of using equips even though that is what its suppose to be. and with more and more of the support now saying "Infernoble" it is such a uphill battle. and with the deflur lvl 10 banned my delfur deck just got obsoleted and there is no support to the og noble knights, Isolde is band and any cards that could help us focuses of fire warrior monsters. Konami made it truly sadly clear. we are forgotten, and the new deck doesnt need the original, just the grail. heck i went to tournaments and was angry that i was winning with a pure infernoble knight deck, I even had a draw against snake eyes. My King would have been easily destroyed, but Charles got me through it. I appreciate the comment but Konami yelled loud and clear.
"Infernoble Noble Knights" give some serious pen-pineapple-apple-pen vibes
Yo dawg, i heard you like noble knights.
I know it'll likely never happen but I would love a Noble Knight Dragon boss card (that is also treated as a warrior).
Knights and dragons go hand in hand after all!
Got a combo for you. They can use the legend of st george to make a new noble knight and his dragon adversary.
Yeah they could have made it based on Merlins Dragon or bring Vortigern
Can we see actual gameplay of this deck and how you use it ?
LETS GOOOO. Towers arthur is viable again
I like the list and examples. Im a huge fan of the og english nights. I just was wondering about your choice in last chapter of the noble knights. Its frustratingly not that searchable. Its not a noble arms card and almost all the other noble knight searchers say noble knight monster (except durendal which says fire warrior). In fact, the only noble card that i know can search it is ignoble knight of high laundsalin...after sending a monster to the grave by battle. If it were searchable i think it would have a really solid place in the deck as a card to just power through any interuptions. Konami, just admit you messed up and errata it to be a noble arms card! :p
Man i always thought that custennin should get a rank 5 xyz that u can summon on top of the rank 4 xyz and that gives him a quick effect bounce. Just some support that would give normal noble knights a chance in modern day.
Funny, no one mentions the main deck Roland and how it synergies with round table, as it search effect can activates during the end phase which can help search for an addition card, and how you can add it to the hand with the 3rd effect, and have a quick play equip and an extra search during the opponent’s end phase.
Honestly it's mostly beacuae the card isn't super needed in an already tight deck that can get everything anyway
At first glance I dismissed the card. Two weeks later I’m on 3 copies😅
I uploaded a 60 cards version off this deck a month ago is prettty good and the ratios are amazing
I liked that Noble Knights had 2 Ways of playing, going for the XYZ or going for the Synchro. But actually with the new support its much better the Synchro/Link path.
I would like if they get something to keep the main cards playable and make It Synchro/XYZ with armament equiped.
Now it's like summon negations, disruption and the fucking Baronne... Tired of same objectives
Honestly I hope they will get a tower at some point. Would be a really good deck but the t1 is just not good enough and it's super hard to play through disruptions while going 2nd
i really love ur combo i watched it more time :)
you can make it in MD now
I already have. It's fun
Whenever I hear Charles I think of dpYGO yelling "CHARLES"
How playable is the deck now since Isolde is forbidden? And is there any good Isolde substitute ?
The deck is practically unplayable now. However it is still legal in master duel
Would love to see a replay of tge deck.
Welp new locals deck aquired
Still waiting for these cards in Master Duel...
Is there a master duel version?
Should be called InferNoble Knights
For algorithm reasons I can't
Gigachad lol
Update the deck, now that Isolde is banned
Update, the deck is now dead
@@MonkeyFightTCG I was hoping there was light somewhere out there... 😔
@@thatguysteven5424maybe in the future but as of right now it's bleak. I'll keep my eyes open at least
@@thatguysteven5424can at least use it in master duel for now lol
yes but teach a gameplay looks too much brick hands
Not actually a lot of bricks it just takes a lot of knowledge to play odd hands
@@MonkeyFightTCG would be nice if ur make replay u deck looks interessing