How was it made? The Daguerreotype | V&A

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @abowla7187
    @abowla7187 2 ปีที่แล้ว +166

    This is so crazy to me. Not only do these look cool, but the trial and error to figure out THIS SPECIFIC process just blows my mind.

    • @cringerBB
      @cringerBB 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You should read Capturing the light, amazing story of Daguerre, and Fox Talbot, and how they independently invented 2 different ways of taking pictures, interesting enough, Fox Talbot did it 5 years before Daguerre, but didn't share it with anybody, so when Daguerre announced his invention nobody cared for Fox Talbot.

  • @P3ach3s70
    @P3ach3s70 3 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    This is an absolutely stunning process to watch! I was looking at old pictures from the 1800s and had no idea that Daguerreotypes were literally captured on metal plates. 😲 These portraits are so beautiful!

    • @keepcalmycarryon
      @keepcalmycarryon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Indeed, I too found this to be highly arousing.
      _Good Day,_
      _brighton margaret dechienne_

    • @moehussain8575
      @moehussain8575 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You behave now Mrs Dechienne.

    • @fstopPhotography
      @fstopPhotography ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To be more precise, it's
      .999 silver tinned onto a copper plate and highly buffed to absolute perfection.
      That usually takes about 45 minutes with different buffing compounds.

  • @Subshane0567
    @Subshane0567 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    You know I just couldn’t understand how cameras work. Even watching this I can only just grasp the concept. Don’t even get me started on how modern cameras work. I’ll save that for tomorrow at 11pm when I’m up to no good😂 it sure is incredible what generational knowledge and curiosity can accomplish. Proud to be alive right now and appreciate it all.

  • @TheBanjoShowOfficial
    @TheBanjoShowOfficial 3 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    People often don't realize that photography is more like a work of chemistry in its entirety. The only reason this would be called photography is because of the intention and desired outcome.

    • @flioink
      @flioink ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Well, nowadays it's more physics and computer science, but I get your point.

  • @okcbanned4793
    @okcbanned4793 4 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    I wish i could have a picture taken from this

  • @zippygotsillyagain
    @zippygotsillyagain ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I recognised the word 'daguerreotype' from mentions in my favourite book of all time 'One Hundred Years of Solitude'. And now here it was a privilege to see how one is made.

    • @Flaming0x
      @Flaming0x ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me too 😆

    • @EmilyMarais
      @EmilyMarais 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That’s why I looked it up too. Also my favourite book 😊

    • @zippygotsillyagain
      @zippygotsillyagain 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@EmilyMarais Nice :) I only hope the upcoming Netflix series does the book justice.

    • @EmilyMarais
      @EmilyMarais 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@zippygotsillyagain I think cross-media adaptations have to be considered their own piece of art, separated from the original. Otherwise disappointment ensues haha

    • @zippygotsillyagain
      @zippygotsillyagain 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@EmilyMarais True enough. I guess I shouldn't expect to recreate how I felt when I fell in love with the book upon first reading it! Like one of my favourite quotes from it says: 'Wherever they might be they always remember that the past was a lie, that memory has no return, that every spring gone by could never be recovered, and that the wildest and most tenacious love was an ephemeral truth in the end.'

  • @cohenlockwood6066
    @cohenlockwood6066 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Louis Daguerre was a French painter who created "daguerreotypes" a process that gave portraits a sharp reflective style, like a mirror. Now you're totally stuck in the Retro Zone. Sad face.

    • @ranskieee
      @ranskieee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      mmmm yes this is why im here

    • @Jaimes_Bond
      @Jaimes_Bond 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes

    • @haguilar84
      @haguilar84 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I was expecting a Life is Strange reference, and you did not disappoint. Spot on!

    • @sonyviva308
      @sonyviva308 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Its either YOU KNOW THIS, or not Max.

    • @lvsmoon
      @lvsmoon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I REALLY LOVED THIS COMMENT

  • @Kstanimal
    @Kstanimal 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i have such fond memories of these. i saw two daguerrotypes at my grandma's house (i think of either her grandparents or parents) and they were absolutely beautiful!! i have never forgotten about them... theyre so fascinating

  • @hanavesela5884
    @hanavesela5884 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I have one of these from 1906 of my great grandfather when he was 17 years old at a local fair. 😁 I allways wondered how it was made. Thanks for this video.

  • @ArvindChoudharyi
    @ArvindChoudharyi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    How fare have we come. From that picture to to the camera shooting it process. Very inspiring.

    • @dragonsaige
      @dragonsaige 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The shot at 1:03 was really well done in highlighting the exact same thing

    • @hanslick3375
      @hanslick3375 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Very few people realize that the first photographic methodology, the daguerreotype, is STILL THE SUPREME QUALITY OF PHOTOGRAPHS. There is no higher quality photograph than the daguerreotype. I quote Grant Romer: “The daguerreotype is the Rolls-Royce of photographs, and the Rolls-Royce is the daguerreotype of automobiles”.
      A well-made daguerreotype can seem to have magical qualities. Highly polished silver is the best reflector known. When holding a daguerreotype, and moving it ever so slightly in order to get the perfect light reflection, an occasionally heard comment is that the viewers felt themselves “transported” to that time and place.

  • @Agirlwithanaccent
    @Agirlwithanaccent 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    This is amazing. I even teared up a little bit.

    • @STTDB1990
      @STTDB1990 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why?

    • @cdb88
      @cdb88 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I get it. It's emotional. Almost like a ritual.

    • @mehmeterdem742
      @mehmeterdem742 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@STTDB1990 Turtle is your grandfather.

  • @edge9380
    @edge9380 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Louis Daguerre was a genius

    • @barrymoore4470
      @barrymoore4470 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Quite possibly, but he built upon the discoveries and methods made earlier by Nicéphore Niépce, who achieved an enduring image in a camera no later than 1827 (some twelve years before Daguerre's process was publicly announced).

    • @MistyBleu
      @MistyBleu ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm glad he persevered with his ambition and succeeded.

  • @festinalente8354
    @festinalente8354 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for explanation. It's clear and substancious. Salutes from Spain.

  • @charlesbcraig
    @charlesbcraig 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    We have an old family locket with one of these inside. Now we know how they made it!

  • @RedcoatsReturn
    @RedcoatsReturn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Fascinating! I always wondered how this worked 🤔 Thankyou! 😊😊😊

  • @Treblaine
    @Treblaine 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Daguerreotypes are extraordinary because they have no grain structure, they are only limited by the wavelength of light, the resolution is - as far as human vision is concerned - infinite.

  • @pavelradev1990
    @pavelradev1990 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is gorgeous! So well done.

  • @bozmar1
    @bozmar1 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Daguerrotypes have the best clarity mirror like picture invented by humans ever

  • @cdb88
    @cdb88 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    absolutely beautiful

  • @josesalvadorhernandez5238
    @josesalvadorhernandez5238 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Looking at the outcome, I question why the books in the background did not photographed along with the model?

    • @SiPakRubah
      @SiPakRubah ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably due to the time it takes for the light to be exposed, and they didn't do it long enough to take the background, probably to prevent the subject from having too much light contrast

  • @julietableichmarholman518
    @julietableichmarholman518 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a detailed, chemical process! Human ingenuity! Fucking brilliant!

  • @r.h.0101
    @r.h.0101 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing. Great video!!!!!

  • @aimankhan6963
    @aimankhan6963 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mesmerising

  • @cagdasozgun5883
    @cagdasozgun5883 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Magical, isn't it?

  • @jph364
    @jph364 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is this in reality not partially done in the dark/safe light?

  • @Dr.advocatejha
    @Dr.advocatejha 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is brilliant :)

  • @KitConnor512
    @KitConnor512 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fascinating 👏🏼

  • @bvista58
    @bvista58 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    fascinating chemistry, but I wouldn't want to inhale those mercury fumes

  • @deku976
    @deku976 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Now I must go out and make one

    • @adriansanchez4875
      @adriansanchez4875 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      did you make it?

    • @deku976
      @deku976 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@adriansanchez4875 not yet

    • @Lone_Coyote
      @Lone_Coyote 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@deku976 Did you, now?

    • @deku976
      @deku976 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Lone_Coyote let's just say that a few variables prevented me from getting to it yet

  • @blackdog3568
    @blackdog3568 ปีที่แล้ว

    Que processo lindo! ❤

  • @earth1020
    @earth1020 หลายเดือนก่อน

    HOW TO DO YOU GET THOSE CAMERAS THESE DAYS

  • @tuesdayjanae3676
    @tuesdayjanae3676 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So back in the day, you only had a picture for you for a very very special occasion?? I’ve always wondered.

    • @Vielenberg
      @Vielenberg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Back in the day you most probably had no pictures of you at all unless you were the 1% of the very rich and living in Western Europe or North America.

    • @s.p.8803
      @s.p.8803 ปีที่แล้ว

      For daguerotypes yes. But for the first pictures, it quickly took off and even non wealthy people had them taken.

  • @nerina1741
    @nerina1741 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Cómo alguien puede llegar a descubrir que se puede hacer eso?

  • @samuelhoffmann162
    @samuelhoffmann162 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Must’ve been a genius who invented this, would’ve taken many trial and error!

    • @s.p.8803
      @s.p.8803 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Louis Daguerre, French painter.

  • @prakritimoudgil3279
    @prakritimoudgil3279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well then when did the coloured pictures come out of it?

    • @RickrollFoot
      @RickrollFoot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      that a joke?

    • @sheveka
      @sheveka 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RickrollFoot No, it's a clumsily worded way of asking 'how did photography evolve from this technique to mass-produced colour photography?'

  • @welcomefella2834
    @welcomefella2834 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    exhilarating

    • @liecretsev
      @liecretsev ปีที่แล้ว

      lmao. i knew someone from that anime would be here

  • @geodatasv6575
    @geodatasv6575 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The fisrt time I heard about it, was on a García Marquéz´s Book

    • @Andrea-zt6sr
      @Andrea-zt6sr ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey, me too! One Hundred Years of Solitude. I read it many years ago and today, finally, I've learned what it is exactly : )

  • @alfinoanduhut3972
    @alfinoanduhut3972 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    So this how senku did...make a first camera

  • @ruthebiju1656
    @ruthebiju1656 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    amazing

  • @skand1nsky
    @skand1nsky ปีที่แล้ว

    Shoutout to Steven Wilson for introducing me to this craziness!

  • @DavidLoveMore
    @DavidLoveMore ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There's a daguerreotype of Ada Lovelace, the first computer programmer (1815-1852).

  • @Lord_Kratos69
    @Lord_Kratos69 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    IT was made in 1838 dauguerrotype camera
    And in 1900 There was and second generation of camera who can took photo just a click like now then you have to instaling it 10 minutes and if something move the photo will look like ghost is on photo

  • @lightsaber5252
    @lightsaber5252 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i see this on dr. stone season 3 episode 2

    • @Shardso
      @Shardso ปีที่แล้ว

      SAME LOL

  • @hanslick3375
    @hanslick3375 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very few people realize that the first photographic methodology, the daguerreotype, is STILL THE SUPREME QUALITY OF PHOTOGRAPHS. There is no higher quality photograph than the daguerreotype. I quote Grant Romer: “The daguerreotype is the Rolls-Royce of photographs, and the Rolls-Royce is the daguerreotype of automobiles”.
    A well-made daguerreotype can seem to have magical qualities. Highly polished silver is the best reflector known. When holding a daguerreotype, and moving it ever so slightly in order to get the perfect light reflection, an occasionally heard comment is that the viewers felt themselves “transported” to that time and place.

  • @imanuelyonatanfreudian
    @imanuelyonatanfreudian 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Daguerre only potrait ? Not landscape 3×4 ? 🙄

  • @connorvaughn6460
    @connorvaughn6460 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    how the fuck did they figure that out??

    • @abiyusadu9974
      @abiyusadu9974 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      well Louis-Jacques-Mandé Daguerre discovered it, it took 4 years

    • @drewgehringer7813
      @drewgehringer7813 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Basically its an intersection of two earlier discoveries: the camera obscura, and light sensitive silver salts. The camera obscura has been invented a few times over in history but didn't start getting used for art until the 1400s: sitting in a darkened room artists would have the camera obscura project an image of a scene outside on a well-lit day onto paper, and trace the projection. Later, in the early 19th century chemicals that reacted to visible light by changing their color were discovered, it didn't take long for people to have the idea "what if I put something covered in light-sensitive chemicals in my camera obscura and projected an image onto it? The light can do the 'tracing' for me: photo-graphy!"
      Daguerre's breakthrough that took a while to figure out was 'fixing': making the plate insensitive to light once a picture is developed on it. Most earlier proof-of-concept photo processes would quickly fade or darken when exposed to light because the unexposed parts of the photograph still had light-sensitive silver salt in them.

  • @orionsuniversepart2932
    @orionsuniversepart2932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Gee. I bet in a century and a half, this daguerreotype will look like what old daguerreotypes look like right now.

  • @kiwisweetheart71
    @kiwisweetheart71 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oh wow!

  • @farhel4194
    @farhel4194 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Came here after reading One Hundred Years of Solitude.

  • @doyoulikejazz9516
    @doyoulikejazz9516 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    would have turned out a bit better if he didn't take it into the light to dust it off. like why would you expose the freshly made light-sensitive plate exposing it to light for like a good 5 seconds already???

  • @MoneyOverFame
    @MoneyOverFame 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting.

  • @Angel-hn1th
    @Angel-hn1th ปีที่แล้ว

    This is wild

  • @LobGamer
    @LobGamer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think I’ve been staring at pictures for too long. Why did I rewind back to the class about daguerreotype again? Something, something, selfie, sad face. WHERE IS CHLOE PRICE and how can I save her again?

  • @michellew4634
    @michellew4634 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    cool!

  • @Upwangupta782
    @Upwangupta782 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Leonardo da Vinci and every Renaissance painters are now offended from heaven to see this new inventions in time changes!!
    Photographers be like,” We don’t mean to offend you guys, our ideas just came naturally or by accidentally to solve the long term struggle of painting! That’s it and it also save time by the way!”

  • @albertpuppymaster671
    @albertpuppymaster671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best thing about this - you don’t need a battery.

  • @jameshatzopoulos9885
    @jameshatzopoulos9885 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I remember doing this when I was a kid with my Uncle Daguerre...

  • @martinj40m
    @martinj40m ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank goodness for my iPhone

  • @patrickmbah3780
    @patrickmbah3780 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    the first comment on this video will be for the persons who read dr stone

    • @JJ-ll8tw
      @JJ-ll8tw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      who’s here after they’ve read dr stone

    • @salmajimenez2642
      @salmajimenez2642 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JJ-ll8tw me :)

    • @mazef8836
      @mazef8836 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      omg thats exactly why

    • @pandora5560
      @pandora5560 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      BAHHAHA I CAME FROM DR STONE

    • @brandonthomas7698
      @brandonthomas7698 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JJ-ll8tw me

  • @erenh977
    @erenh977 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Who come here after dr stone 's episode? 😂

  • @motorenginev1nce446
    @motorenginev1nce446 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who else here thinks this is an asmr in disguise

    • @jordannietos
      @jordannietos ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me lol. Those little sounds when it's developing 🤌

  • @dm.3145
    @dm.3145 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who is here from life is strange?

  • @arabic987
    @arabic987 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who is from tuf university 😂❤

  • @andrewphillips799
    @andrewphillips799 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Have you noticed, ALL ppl who appear in the original Daguerrotype photos are now DECEASED in 2021.

  • @thaliaivanka2783
    @thaliaivanka2783 ปีที่แล้ว

    how to render a photo in 19th century

    • @SiPakRubah
      @SiPakRubah ปีที่แล้ว

      *mid 19th-century (1840's -1850's to be more precise)
      They started to produce a faster and cheaper way to take photography during the 1860s

  • @29jemo
    @29jemo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am here because of Dr. Stone

  • @davidjackson925
    @davidjackson925 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is soooo SteamPunk

  • @commentator245
    @commentator245 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm here from the Red Dead Redemption 2 Mission from Jeremiah Compson.. Lol

  • @RickrollFoot
    @RickrollFoot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    amogus 𒄐

  • @dsb001-ye3qr
    @dsb001-ye3qr ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Im here aftwr watcj dr stone anime s2