If anyone is wondering, it needs 7.1 surround sound. I have the hyper X cloud 2s, enabling that built in surround sound it has makes the audio play much better. Ironically its currently the only real use I have found for the headphones / Headset, as it usually makes things 10x louder in games.
There's a good story from the Finnish military of a couple of young fellows doing their national service on an island along the southern coast of Finland, they have orders to do rangings on all Russian registry vessels, especially military ones, to make sure that they do not violate Finnish waters. Well as any soldiers on a tedious watch, they get bored and fed up with having to manually use an optical scope and a recognition book to range their targets so they decide to use their laser rangefinder on a Russian destroyer. Not long after they do, their Lieutenant kicks their door down and starts yelling at them to turn their damn radio on, as every Finnish position was screaming bloody murder at them to turn their laser off, as the Russians had been threatening to bombard them, as they thought the laser was a targeting laser signaling an imminent attack. Not a lesson they were likely to forget I reckon.
@@kim98677 hard to say, being painted by targeting laser usually mean an ordinance is on the way. Could be a trigger happy captain. Never underestimate the Russians.
@@kim98677 I never said full scale war would break out. Just that it could get ugly. Like the time US Navy shot down Iranian airliner. They believed they were being attacked and couldn’t get a response from the aircraft.
Fun fact: The stock on his rifle is a GRS (Grodås Rifle Stocks). It's made in a small village with 1200 inhabitants, in a valley in western Norway called Hornindal. They started small in 2011, and now they've become an international brand!
Would a lot of their business be for biathlon rifles. I live in Ireland and watch races occasionally and wondered were they hand built specifically for each athlete.
over in scotland my dad uses a range finder for golf.... To clarify: In Scotland that’s what they are used for golf. They are completely repurposed as golfing (or other sports of a similar caliber) tools
mm / mils = m. Target height in millimetres divided by mils equals distance in metres. In a previous video the instructor says MRAD are not metric, but also says both MRAD and the metric system are base 10. This is very handy bit of information. Sure, you can work in whatever units you prefer, but the metric system lends itself to this easily. In the field, his 15" target becomes my 375mm. 375mm / 3.5mils = 107m, his result from the pocket slide is in yards, 115 yards, which converts to 105m. 375mm / 1.5mils = 250m, his result is 280 yards, or 256m. 375mm / 0.7mils = 535m, his result is 590 yards, or 539m. Note the pocket slide version is rounded to convenient numbers. For a 15" target the actual distances are: 3.5mils is 119 yards or 108m. 1.5mils is 277 yards or 254m. 0.7mils is 595 yards or 544m. One might argue I'm building imprecision into the calculations by converting every 1" to 25mm up front instead of using 25.4mm, but I would counter that with the pocket slide also has imprecision built-in by rounding to convenient numbers. In all fairness, if I were shooting distances where precise calculations become critical, I would be converting by using 25.4mm to the inch. If an instructor were to say to me a plate is 24" x 24", I hear 600 x 600 (every 4" is 100mm, near enough). Using the same examples through the scope (FFP MRAD reticle) there's only one other calculation to do, whether it's done upstairs, with pen and paper, or with a calculator: 600 / 3.5 = 171m 600 / 1.5 = 400m 600 / 0.7 = 857m Using 24" and the given three mil values: 190 yards (converts to 174m), 444 yards (406m), and 952 yards (870m). Lastly, if the target was about 6' in height, that'd be about 1800mm to me. 3.5mils is 514m (actual 522m), but that'll do, at least for that distance. 1.5mils is 1200m, so getting a bit leggy, there. 0.7mils is 2570m... I'd probably take a bus and get a bit closer for that one.
On conversion of inch to metric, use 25.375 mm to an inch.....in other words use 25mm + 1,5% Your 600 becomes 609 without much hassle and is very close to 609.6! When dealing with pi (3.14159), calculate with 3 + 15% and you look like a genius doing these calculations in the field (but you're simply being clever).
@@psychosneighbor1509 to be fair you don’t just sit in a classroom for four days. Generally courses such as these have an academic portion and the rest is applying principles they’ve been teaching. Look up racing school sometime if you want to see expensive instruction that you could “just look up on the internet instead” lol. 😉 Spending some time one-on-one with an instructor can help correct some invisible bad habits, prepare you for scenarios you hadn’t thought about, and motivate you to grow. I’m fairly experienced with handguns but my last instructor was especially demanding on me. Kept pushing me so I didn’t stay in my comfort zone. It was fun, worth the price.
I have had the same issue. The guys looked strangely at me when they saw I had strapped it onto my backpack. Really inconvenient instrument to use in the field.
@@Ulvetann Same. Went shooting for the first time and I figured they were gonna make fun of me for being a noob. Sure enough, they saw me carrying this thing and pointed and laughed uncontrollably.
"I'm not going to tech you how to use a rangefinder..." Proceeds to do one simple equation and breaks out a slide ruler. "Sick. So I actually only need one of those, a working brain, and two decent eyes then? Why did I pay for this class again?"
You do still need to understand how to read mil-dot and calculate the range. Sometimes you don't have a range card (he's using a Mildot Master), you might need to do it in your head.
I think the instructor forgot to mention how the relation between distance and height is inversely linear. So if a target with a height of 2 markings on the reticle is 100m away, then the same target at a height of 1 marking is 200m away. Then you only need to find the height-to-distance ratio at one point, and other distances can be found using the reticle itself.
I've been playing ARMA and Squad for awhile and the video game guides never help. Out of everything I've seen, this is the best advice I've gotten in months...
He says he doesn’t teach to use a range finder because there’s not much to it but point reticle at known size target pull out cheat sheet and cheat isn’t much either
He briefly mentioned formulas you can use but didn't get into them, maybe it was later in the lesson. The formulas are basic trigonometry, it's a basic right angle triangle with 1 known side and 1 known angle. 1 known side = Object of known size centered on the reticle, divided by 2 1 known angle = Degrees/Minutes/Seconds of the markings on the reticle to the top of the object you're sighting. Horizontal distance = known side divided by tan(angle) Either you whip out a cheat sheet or you whip out a calculator. Either way, you're whipping something out. ~_^ Edit: or the mils thing, that works too.
Marine vet here, just saw this on my feed and had to click and will say love it. I learned on iron sights, could hit t-box at 1000 yards...and then they introduced the Acog...let's just say I took my grandfather right and continued with iron sights out shooting my marines the entire time. Using the skills I was taught on range, windage, elevation and so on
Im an artillery observer and this method can be used on a greater scale, to be more specific I've used it on tanks, and other vehicles, even dismounted men, at multiple kilometers away.
Remember to set parallax on scope before milling the target. Out of focus = object appears larger. Also I prefer the reticle "MSR" for milling targets. Works fine if you get some practise.
I love my mildot master. It's one of my best long range shooting tools I ever bought period. You can even switch to MOA by removing the card and flipping it over.
Excellent video! I shoot PRS matches and prefer MOA. We might not know all of the distances, but we know the target sizes. I can easily range by zooming into the target and use my reticle to calculate. Target size in inches × 95.5 ÷ reticle measurement in MOA = distance to target in yards. The procedure is the same for MRAD, but the multiplier is 27.77 instead of 95.5 Even though most precision shooters are using MRAD, and it seems to be the military standard worldwide, I personally prefer MOA. I'm just faster with MOA, especially in a situation where I need to make a very quick adjustment, I can round the 95.5 up to 100 to make quicker calculations. It might not be exact, but the vast majority of the time will get me close enough to bang steel with the next shot. And MOA just makes more sense to me in my head.
What do you mean by reticle measurement? I was looking for an answer to the question of; where does the scope power become involved into this equation?
@Log Splitta Or, as he clearly stated in the beginning, get an MOA reticle/ turreted scope. As he said, they both work the same way. Only the tacticool(keyboard commandos) keep saying "MRAD is better...." Charts are available for both. Most hunting scopes are MOA. If you have more than one rifle with scope, stick with one system and become excellent at using that system. They work the same.
Agreed ! 4 decades ago I used a duplex ret and subtended via the mag ring on a 16 inch deer chest average for My area then i used a carbide scribe to scratch a mark and range on the mag ring . Worked great at several realistic hunting distance in My area .
Most american thing ever... Massive gun, holstered side arm even though he is teaching massive american flag in corner of room and patriotic picture frames on wall
This is a good physics exercise. “Zoom”=image size/ real size= image distance/ real distance. This way if you know the distance in the lenses of the scope and the zoom, you can calculate the distance of the object
So, what is the *FORMULA* to calculate these numbers? Can't make one of those "simple tables" if I don't know how to calculate those numbers! which make the whole video kind of pointless. :(
Pretty sure this is from a class, so this is just a snippet of it. If you really want the formula then just google how to rangefind with a MIL or MOA reticle. Ain’t that hard to at least search it up
This man is a god! Wish he was with me at DamNeck at designated marksman school back in 2002. External ballistics. Beautiful. All of this makes sense to me as a half ass sniper in the Corps.
I'm going to dedicate all my financial savings into the development of a new bullet that has two selective targeting modes: (Extreme Prejudice Precision and Everyone in the room)
Fun fact, most of Soviet scopes including PSO-1 actually has a sort of small things that you can use for range finding purpose on right side of their reticle.
Wish I had this information 40 years ago .It would have saved me a few ammo cans full of ammo shooting predators. Both two legged and four legs. I have been a long range shooter from a young age
A simpler way is to just multiply target size by 1000 and divide by mils in scope. Using your example: 15 inch target X 1000 = 15,000 inches ÷ 3.5 mils = 119 yds Not only is this simpler, it works with any measurement units: yards or meters. The math is simple and precise, and far better than the old moa=inch @100 yds, which is wrong by 5%. However, it's still subject to errors from inability to "mil" target accurately, ie target might be moving, or hidden by long grass, or smaller/larger than assumed.
This is a pretty good basic intro to the concept. If you want more info, Ryan Cleckner did numerous outstanding quality videos with the National Shooting Sports Foundation TH-cam channel Dude was a Sniper Team Leader in the 75th Ranger Regiment, Sniper School Instructor, and has taught endless civilians. Plus he's got a best selling long range handbook, and he's a 2A attorney. Definitely look him up
While I don't doubt range finding with mildots is likely "very precise", I think I'd still find it easier to range find with the chevron style of scopes genuinely common to the Slavic regions.
If you love your ears, turn on mono sound in windows settings. It will play left ear channel on right. Just remember to disable it or you'll have problems in games.
At what magnification though. If I have an increased magnification the target will cover more mils. Wouldn’t there be a factor to multiply or divide by in the formula to compensate for that. The video really didn’t teach you anything but how to use a ranging card lol. Anyone know an actual formula?
Good info, but all it was is how to read the info didn’t provide said formula to get the info. I know it’s optic specific but it would be nice to know if it is a Mil’s optic the formula is this....... if it’s an MOA optic the formula is this....... etc
Not sure how it compares to real ones, but in FPS games the sights that seem to work the best have the converging parabolic lines coming from both sides. It's kind of idiot-proof to adjust elevation until the thing being shot fits right between the lines. (Not all games have accurate sights, but the ones that do - that type is sufficient for ranging.) Not sure the name of it, but that particular marking system doesn't have any mental math involved. For the bazooka/RPG it's the width of the frontal vehicle profile that gets matched up, and for infantry weapons it tends to be the shoulder width.
Most games won’t have bullet mechanics accurate enough for the reticle to make a difference what does make a difference is reference points and a cross section so you can get a feel for what mil you should aim with at a certain estimated distance
ha, it really is only left ear audio. i always leave my right ear open to the outside so that i can listen to my surroundings and had no idea it was left audio only
Mils/moa don’t change size when you vary your scopes magnification. They are pre set and do not change. They are simply extremely precise measurements of angles
@Jeremiah Bullfrog many scopes have a third knob on the outside (other two are windage and elevation) to vary magnification. But, when you vary the magnification the scope also just zoos in on the reticle more. The mil dots are still accurate measurements despite the change in FOV
My left ear is loving this
My right ear is having a spiritual experience
My sound system is definitely fucky. His voice is coming out of every speaker except the right front.
I thought that it was just me.
Thought for a moment my headphones gone fuck up again.
If anyone is wondering, it needs 7.1 surround sound. I have the hyper X cloud 2s, enabling that built in surround sound it has makes the audio play much better. Ironically its currently the only real use I have found for the headphones / Headset, as it usually makes things 10x louder in games.
Santa Claus teaching elves how to eliminate naughty children.
I was thinking the same damn thing 😂😂
American Dad reference?
When he gives you coal that means you've been marked for death.
The black mark
r/cursedcomments might be your destination sir
Why is George Lucas telling me how to snipe.
and why is he whispering in my left ear?
@@CynicalOldDwarf thought i was going crazy lol
There will be a time and point where we need to bear arms against the zombie apocalypse
It falls upon US to end Disney COMRADE!
For glorious Star Wars!
So that you can do your duty and destroy Disney
There's a good story from the Finnish military of a couple of young fellows doing their national service on an island along the southern coast of Finland, they have orders to do rangings on all Russian registry vessels, especially military ones, to make sure that they do not violate Finnish waters.
Well as any soldiers on a tedious watch, they get bored and fed up with having to manually use an optical scope and a recognition book to range their targets so they decide to use their laser rangefinder on a Russian destroyer.
Not long after they do, their Lieutenant kicks their door down and starts yelling at them to turn their damn radio on, as every Finnish position was screaming bloody murder at them to turn their laser off, as the Russians had been threatening to bombard them, as they thought the laser was a targeting laser signaling an imminent attack.
Not a lesson they were likely to forget I reckon.
Wow that could end up real ugly
This is why I like TH-cam comments.
@@kim98677 hard to say, being painted by targeting laser usually mean an ordinance is on the way. Could be a trigger happy captain. Never underestimate the Russians.
@@kim98677 I never said full scale war would break out. Just that it could get ugly. Like the time US Navy shot down Iranian airliner. They believed they were being attacked and couldn’t get a response from the aircraft.
The end part was so fucking unreadble, use ", . ;" please.
Thank you for the lesson, tactical Santa.
How to aim gifts in chimneys
I was going to say that this man is Santa Claus when he isn't preparing to give gifts for Christmas.
😂😂😂😂
Fun fact: The stock on his rifle is a GRS (Grodås Rifle Stocks). It's made in a small village with 1200 inhabitants, in a valley in western Norway called Hornindal. They started small in 2011, and now they've become an international brand!
Cool thanks for the info
Would a lot of their business be for biathlon rifles. I live in Ireland and watch races occasionally and wondered were they hand built specifically for each athlete.
Legit
Them legend.
Had one, took shots at 1000 yards with my T3. Not great for fast shooting though. Probably the most comfortable hunting stock.
This video made me think my headphones were broken...
Me too! booted up another video to make sure they were ok ha
I checked mine as soon as the video started
Anyone else hearing the low random music right ear phone?
Same, didnt even watch because of it
@@hillwarrior6 yes, I dont know why they did that but its horrible
over in scotland my dad uses a range finder for golf....
To clarify: In Scotland that’s what they are used for golf. They are completely repurposed as golfing (or other sports of a similar caliber) tools
😂😂
Him legend.
@@1337fraggzb00N him is
@@applejambers7674 he meant what he said
My stepdad has a range finder but it's just an un-magnified tube with some lines on the end
mm / mils = m.
Target height in millimetres divided by mils equals distance in metres.
In a previous video the instructor says MRAD are not metric, but also says both MRAD and the metric system are base 10.
This is very handy bit of information. Sure, you can work in whatever units you prefer, but the metric system lends itself to this easily.
In the field, his 15" target becomes my 375mm.
375mm / 3.5mils = 107m, his result from the pocket slide is in yards, 115 yards, which converts to 105m.
375mm / 1.5mils = 250m, his result is 280 yards, or 256m.
375mm / 0.7mils = 535m, his result is 590 yards, or 539m.
Note the pocket slide version is rounded to convenient numbers.
For a 15" target the actual distances are:
3.5mils is 119 yards or 108m.
1.5mils is 277 yards or 254m.
0.7mils is 595 yards or 544m.
One might argue I'm building imprecision into the calculations by converting every 1" to 25mm up front instead of using 25.4mm, but I would counter that with the pocket slide also has imprecision built-in by rounding to convenient numbers. In all fairness, if I were shooting distances where precise calculations become critical, I would be converting by using 25.4mm to the inch.
If an instructor were to say to me a plate is 24" x 24", I hear 600 x 600 (every 4" is 100mm, near enough). Using the same examples through the scope (FFP MRAD reticle) there's only one other calculation to do, whether it's done upstairs, with pen and paper, or with a calculator:
600 / 3.5 = 171m
600 / 1.5 = 400m
600 / 0.7 = 857m
Using 24" and the given three mil values: 190 yards (converts to 174m), 444 yards (406m), and 952 yards (870m).
Lastly, if the target was about 6' in height, that'd be about 1800mm to me.
3.5mils is 514m (actual 522m), but that'll do, at least for that distance.
1.5mils is 1200m, so getting a bit leggy, there.
0.7mils is 2570m... I'd probably take a bus and get a bit closer for that one.
🤤
Now that also is a good bit of info. Thank you for making it rather simple! Old school is always the best!👍😉
@@mjsmith8655 not THE best but it ALWAYS works.
On conversion of inch to metric, use 25.375 mm to an inch.....in other words use 25mm + 1,5%
Your 600 becomes 609 without much hassle and is very close to 609.6!
When dealing with pi (3.14159), calculate with 3 + 15% and you look like a genius doing these calculations in the field (but you're simply being clever).
Lay off the adderall bro!
This information can cost 2 grand for 4 days in a rifle class.
Thanks for uploading and sharing with the public!
People would actually pay $500/day for a rifle class? Hmmm...
@@psychosneighbor1509 I wouldn't, but if you go on the Gunsight website, it probably gives you class costs...
Really? This was rather basic information not even 30 years ago.
Or you could just pay attention when your high school math teacher was explaining basic trigonometry...
@@psychosneighbor1509 to be fair you don’t just sit in a classroom for four days. Generally courses such as these have an academic portion and the rest is applying principles they’ve been teaching. Look up racing school sometime if you want to see expensive instruction that you could “just look up on the internet instead” lol. 😉
Spending some time one-on-one with an instructor can help correct some invisible bad habits, prepare you for scenarios you hadn’t thought about, and motivate you to grow. I’m fairly experienced with handguns but my last instructor was especially demanding on me. Kept pushing me so I didn’t stay in my comfort zone. It was fun, worth the price.
Me who has never held a real a gun in his life. And got recommended this and watch a guy teach how to measure sniper scopes. "Fascinating"
@The Lone Stranger youre not wrong
@The Lone Stranger maybe i should but alas I live in Cali Bay Area ranges are not exactly common
@The Lone Stranger even in Europe? ... :') *tears run down the cheeks*
It's time you get a dose of 'Merica.
Well...
What will you hunt when the mushrooms are extinct after the armageddon ?
🤣😅✌
1:45 I can't fit that in my pack and it's too big to mount on my rifle.
I have had the same issue. The guys looked strangely at me when they saw I had strapped it onto my backpack. Really inconvenient instrument to use in the field.
@@Ulvetann Same. Went shooting for the first time and I figured they were gonna make fun of me for being a noob. Sure enough, they saw me carrying this thing and pointed and laughed uncontrollably.
The target usually don't let me use it on them... rude...
Ah.. F*cking hell my stomach hurts.. Jahaha.
Underrated comment, omfg
Someone start a gofundme to get him a new marker.
Doesn't need a gofundme. He charges his students for the class.
@@guardrailbiter r/woooosh
@@guardrailbiter r/wooooooooooooooooooooooooosh
"I'm not going to tech you how to use a rangefinder..."
Proceeds to do one simple equation and breaks out a slide ruler.
"Sick. So I actually only need one of those, a working brain, and two decent eyes then? Why did I pay for this class again?"
You do still need to understand how to read mil-dot and calculate the range. Sometimes you don't have a range card (he's using a Mildot Master), you might need to do it in your head.
@@ChaiSuBin the calculation can be found online though? And another commenter gave the equation and explained vary well
@@ChaiSuBin So mil is not millimetres? Cool, I was so confused as to why he was using metric and imperial in the same sentence.
I think the instructor forgot to mention how the relation between distance and height is inversely linear.
So if a target with a height of 2 markings on the reticle is 100m away, then the same target at a height of 1 marking is 200m away.
Then you only need to find the height-to-distance ratio at one point, and other distances can be found using the reticle itself.
There wasn't even an equation. He just told you to replace your rangefinder by another kind of rangefinder. what a waste of money.
I've been playing ARMA and Squad for awhile and the video game guides never help. Out of everything I've seen, this is the best advice I've gotten in months...
Jesus christ 🤣!
Lol yeah best tutorials for arma sniping are sniper schools
Gamers 🙄! Im one too but .... fucken hell !!!
What is great is I searched for a rangefinder review and this was the first video that popped up 😂
The universe is telling me to learn a skill
americans getting ready for the elections
personally I'm saving this into my Arma 3 folder!
@@Muhanoid same
im ordering a bunch of 10 dollar knives on amazon
Don't you mean school?
Who you fighting for? LOL
He says he doesn’t teach to use a range finder because there’s not much to it but
point reticle at known size target pull out cheat sheet and cheat isn’t much either
He briefly mentioned formulas you can use but didn't get into them, maybe it was later in the lesson. The formulas are basic trigonometry, it's a basic right angle triangle with 1 known side and 1 known angle.
1 known side = Object of known size centered on the reticle, divided by 2
1 known angle = Degrees/Minutes/Seconds of the markings on the reticle to the top of the object you're sighting.
Horizontal distance = known side divided by tan(angle)
Either you whip out a cheat sheet or you whip out a calculator. Either way, you're whipping something out. ~_^
Edit: or the mils thing, that works too.
Well you can memorize that sheet but you have to keep the range finder, like learning math only on calculator.
This gentleman is knowledgeable. Thank you.
Marine vet here, just saw this on my feed and had to click and will say love it. I learned on iron sights, could hit t-box at 1000 yards...and then they introduced the Acog...let's just say I took my grandfather right and continued with iron sights out shooting my marines the entire time. Using the skills I was taught on range, windage, elevation and so on
The biggest issue with the rangefinder is whenever One spawns in a crate, someone with a PDW takes it first and refuses to use team speak.
This is awesome, I always wondered how to use the little marks on the reticle on a rifle. Awesome vid!
Believe it or not, I found SVD Scope system easiest to use on finding a target's range.
Im an artillery observer and this method can be used on a greater scale, to be more specific I've used it on tanks, and other vehicles, even dismounted men, at multiple kilometers away.
3:03 - how can anyone write the number 15 like this?
he even started with 5's top like bro wtf?
Maybe he's from Germany
@@HairyBalls2896 wait you start at the bottom??
@@prussainrusher7843 its a nationality thing?????
Who writes 5 from the bottom.
Remember to set parallax on scope before milling the target. Out of focus = object appears larger. Also I prefer the reticle "MSR" for milling targets. Works fine if you get some practise.
I just finished college last year and I hated every second of it but watching this makes me want to go join sniper school 😂
I wish they teach like this in schools these days. God bless old days thank you for putting it out here greatly appreciated it.
"Let me show you how accurately this works."
**headshot**
I love my mildot master. It's one of my best long range shooting tools I ever bought period. You can even switch to MOA by removing the card and flipping it over.
"15" and that's on average that's close enough for government work" lmao
Excellent video! I shoot PRS matches and prefer MOA. We might not know all of the distances, but we know the target sizes. I can easily range by zooming into the target and use my reticle to calculate.
Target size in inches × 95.5 ÷ reticle measurement in MOA = distance to target in yards.
The procedure is the same for MRAD, but the multiplier is 27.77 instead of 95.5
Even though most precision shooters are using MRAD, and it seems to be the military standard worldwide, I personally prefer MOA.
I'm just faster with MOA, especially in a situation where I need to make a very quick adjustment, I can round the 95.5 up to 100 to make quicker calculations. It might not be exact, but the vast majority of the time will get me close enough to bang steel with the next shot. And MOA just makes more sense to me in my head.
What do you mean by reticle measurement? I was looking for an answer to the question of; where does the scope power become involved into this equation?
my left ear knows exactly how to determine ranges without a rangefinder
Stfu blm clown
@@ImRanger no no, he's got a point.
Stfu lol
@@sebcw1204 lol
Simple in depth explanations and easy to understand and listen to. Thank You
I haven't tried looking yet, but where do I get one of those conversion charts
@Log Splitta Or, as he clearly stated in the beginning, get an MOA reticle/ turreted scope. As he said, they both work the same way. Only the tacticool(keyboard commandos) keep saying "MRAD is better...." Charts are available for both. Most hunting scopes are MOA. If you have more than one rifle with scope, stick with one system and become excellent at using that system. They work the same.
Get it on ebay $35
Agreed ! 4 decades ago I used a duplex ret and subtended via the mag ring on a 16 inch deer chest average for My area then i used a carbide scribe to scratch a mark and range on the mag ring . Worked great at several realistic hunting distance in My area .
Easy: after long time playing games you‘ll get a feeling
i love how every instructor have that vocal confirmation of understanding "alright"
Most american thing ever... Massive gun, holstered side arm even though he is teaching massive american flag in corner of room and patriotic picture frames on wall
only classroom ive ever seen actively protected
This is a good physics exercise. “Zoom”=image size/ real size= image distance/ real distance. This way if you know the distance in the lenses of the scope and the zoom, you can calculate the distance of the object
So, what is the *FORMULA* to calculate these numbers?
Can't make one of those "simple tables" if I don't know how to calculate those numbers! which make the whole video kind of pointless. :(
Pretty sure this is from a class, so this is just a snippet of it. If you really want the formula then just google how to rangefind with a MIL or MOA reticle. Ain’t that hard to at least search it up
Its just basic triangle calculation. You need to know how far away the dots on your scopes are and you use triangle formula to calculate the distance.
Trigonometry son! Very simple high school stuff to be honest.
You can derive the formula from the variables and results he presented.
I don’t care about shooting but this man is wise. Would hear him out on any subject.
This man is a god! Wish he was with me at DamNeck at designated marksman school back in 2002. External ballistics. Beautiful. All of this makes sense to me as a half ass sniper in the Corps.
So, You need a known size reference? Well Joke's on you. This method will never work against my army of midgets and children!
My left ear is really enjoying this video!!!
I aint got time fo all that, thats why I hunt with a AK with a drum mag... One is bound to hit eventually 😅
Thank you comrad. This will help my tarkov survival very much.
Not entirely sure why this was recommended to me after media declared biden winner.
Maybe it's trying to tell me something.
Lol
My left ear is loving this guys voice
I'm going to dedicate all my financial savings into the development of a new bullet that has two selective targeting modes: (Extreme Prejudice Precision and Everyone in the room)
so 50bmg?
A 30mm HE and AP?
Lmfaoo
Sony Pony I didn't know you could snipe targets at 1000YRDS with a "Cannon"
@@TheDFM007 what do you think the navy uses?
There are three variables. Range, angle, know size of object in view. Have any two, you can calculated the third.
I understood almost nothing but I watched the whole thing lol.
I like old school dudes teaching stuff.
Finaly i understand the linings! Thanks
I don't know who I was expecting to teach this but I wasn't surprised
Thank you Sir. KISS systems work so well.
This was the most valuable knowledge I ever heard
The title should be, "Making people think their headphones are broken"
My left ear now knows how to range without a range finder. Thanks.
Does it matter if you have a second focal plane optic because the mil/moa chand on magnification.
Best info in my right ear.
Will definitely try this tonight, thanks
Like a good math teacher with a disdain of calculators. This man knows his stuff.
that mill dot master is pretty cool going to go check my local gun shops!
Fun fact, most of Soviet scopes including PSO-1 actually has a sort of small things that you can use for range finding purpose on right side of their reticle.
My left ear is really enjoying this video.
@2:54 judging by how much the marker is faded out , he's done this class many times lol good stuff
Wish I had this information 40 years ago .It would have saved me a few ammo cans full of ammo shooting predators. Both two legged and four legs. I have been a long range shooter from a young age
Nice thing to know!!! Now all I need is that Savage riffle I been eyeballing to put it to use... lol
A very smart man and worth listening to. Thanks for the info well presented 😀🤔
My left ear loved this video
HAHAHHA was looking for this comment
I thought that was just a well edited thumbnail. Didn't expect a giant physical reticle
DMR power! Love it.. I have several of them...
I love how there's low volume lounge music in the background of this.
My left ear is very well informed, my right ear had no idea what was happening
Does it matter if you have the scope zoomed in?
A simpler way is to just multiply target size by 1000 and divide by mils in scope.
Using your example: 15 inch target X 1000 = 15,000 inches ÷ 3.5 mils = 119 yds
Not only is this simpler, it works with any measurement units: yards or meters.
The math is simple and precise, and far better than the old moa=inch @100 yds, which is wrong by 5%. However, it's still subject to errors from inability to "mil" target accurately, ie target might be moving, or hidden by long grass, or smaller/larger than assumed.
This is a pretty good basic intro to the concept.
If you want more info, Ryan Cleckner did numerous outstanding quality videos with the National Shooting Sports Foundation TH-cam channel
Dude was a Sniper Team Leader in the 75th Ranger Regiment, Sniper School Instructor, and has taught endless civilians. Plus he's got a best selling long range handbook, and he's a 2A attorney.
Definitely look him up
While I don't doubt range finding with mildots is likely "very precise", I think I'd still find it easier to range find with the chevron style of scopes genuinely common to the Slavic regions.
Wow really well done! Thank you
If you love your ears, turn on mono sound in windows settings. It will play left ear channel on right. Just remember to disable it or you'll have problems in games.
Russian scope PSO-1 with its scale is way simplier
At what magnification though. If I have an increased magnification the target will cover more mils. Wouldn’t there be a factor to multiply or divide by in the formula to compensate for that. The video really didn’t teach you anything but how to use a ranging card lol. Anyone know an actual formula?
Good info, but all it was is how to read the info didn’t provide said formula to get the info. I know it’s optic specific but it would be nice to know if it is a Mil’s optic the formula is this....... if it’s an MOA optic the formula is this....... etc
Not sure how it compares to real ones, but in FPS games the sights that seem to work the best have the converging parabolic lines coming from both sides. It's kind of idiot-proof to adjust elevation until the thing being shot fits right between the lines. (Not all games have accurate sights, but the ones that do - that type is sufficient for ranging.) Not sure the name of it, but that particular marking system doesn't have any mental math involved. For the bazooka/RPG it's the width of the frontal vehicle profile that gets matched up, and for infantry weapons it tends to be the shoulder width.
Most games won’t have bullet mechanics accurate enough for the reticle to make a difference what does make a difference is reference points and a cross section so you can get a feel for what mil you should aim with at a certain estimated distance
This guy is great.
Best Warzone Tips from Santa.
(height in inches x 27.77)/height in mils = distance in yards
(target size in millimeters) / (height in mils) = distance in meters
There're 25.4mm per inch, but you can round down to 25mm per inch.
How do you know the target size tho?
Estimate.
The Boogaloo is near my brethren! We must be prepared tac santa has spoken!
I think i may have missed it but how does magnification come into play here? cause that will drastically alter the calc.
ha, it really is only left ear audio. i always leave my right ear open to the outside so that i can listen to my surroundings and had no idea it was left audio only
i take that there must be a table for cm instead of inches too right ?
What about the magnification on the scope? How can't this even have an influence on the result?
Mils/moa don’t change size when you vary your scopes magnification. They are pre set and do not change. They are simply extremely precise measurements of angles
@Jeremiah Bullfrog many scopes have a third knob on the outside (other two are windage and elevation) to vary magnification. But, when you vary the magnification the scope also just zoos in on the reticle more. The mil dots are still accurate measurements despite the change in FOV
So when i put my phone in the video up right i can hear it from the bottom but when it’s sideways i hear it from the top
My left ear enjoyed this lesson.
I like those Russian scope with built in range finder on the scope.
How did I get here... Have not watched anything gun related for a long time...
Glad I did though. This was interesting.
My left ear is telling me how to become an effective long ranged killer using just a sniper scope
while my right ear is playing minecraft
But is this big circle not a little bit too big to carry around all the time?
Have a question please let me know Hawke sidwinder 10 × 42 for my Diana 56 please sir