"His best is worth more" - Is a first round pick enough for Bailey Smith? I Trading Day I Fox Footy
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ต.ค. 2024
- Bailey Smith trade talks have stalled with Geelong only prepared to offer a first round pick, will he go to the national draft as the Bulldogs refuse to let him go 'cheap'.
Subscribe and 🔔 to Fox Footy TH-cam 👉 bit.ly/39CUfB1
Stream Fox Footy 👉 kayosports.app...
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL
Facebook: / foxfooty
Twitter: / foxfooty
Instagram: / foxfooty
Comparing smith to baker is crazy😅
17 for Smith after pretending for 2 years that Esava was Buddy 2.0 with his market value. Did Mackie do an internship with Dodoro?
"play the mental health card".... what a soul less statement.
Quintessential Sports Journalism.
Freo want to pay 2 firsts for bolten and the cats are trying only pick 17... Are you kidding me lmao
There’s huge differences, first is that Shai Bolton is contracted till the end of 2028 so Richmond can keep him and also a club looking to get him will have to offer what he’s worth as a minimum where as Bailey smith is out of contract so if a deal with Geelong doesn’t happen dogs will get nothing by sending him to the draft. 2nd is Shai Bolton hasn’t been injured like Smith has missing the entirety of 2024 season. Dogs don’t have a strong position here.
@@HitchyBruh Issue is bolten is rarely good in games and smith is every game. He's 23 and other clubs will want him too, if he goes to the draft geelong wont get him so no one wins. He is worth way more than just pick 17 lmao
@@Tosicc567 nah there’s actually a good chance Geelong will still pick him up through the draft, Smith has made it clear he wants to be at Geelong so clubs won’t be looking to grab a player that doesn’t want to be there, has had multiple injuries and the fact that the draft is extra promising this time around matters too.
Also no one wins? I mean at worst Geelong keep their pick, Bulldogs get absolutely nothing. Would u rather a first rounder in a strong draft or nothing? Btw I wasn’t saying Geelong’s 1st pick was great for the dogs but I do think the 1st round pick and a future 2nd or 3rd round pick is fair and dogs would accept this. My point mainly came from Smith not being worth 2 first rounders like Richmond are being offered for Shai Bolton and dogs certainly won’t get that for Smith.
@@HitchyBruh I wasnt saying he was worth 2 first rounders either but lesser players are getting that atm. Pick 17 and a future second is about right, St Kilda could genuinely pick smith up in the draft. Its just a pointless risk for the cats to make and it kinda shows they didnt want him that bad they'd risk him in the draft
Has there ever been a journalist shilling harder for his team than Jon Ralph? Richmond should put him on the payroll.
It's a bit much, isn't it?
Absolutely ridiculous. Baz is 100% worth more than pick 17. He won the best finals player at 21. Worth a top 10 pick minimum.
Do you give your own best player of the finals award? Cos he definitely didn’t win any award given by anyone else, look it up.
and then since 21, he has been out of form and done his acl.
Lol in the NFL if you do an ACL you won't even get a 5th round draft pick- it's a death sentence
Pick 17 (which will end up in the 20s after bids) for Baz is pathetic. Bolton, Baker and Rioli going for top 12 picks + extras is absurd in comparison. What are these journos smoking?
The key difference is that the tigers players are contracted. Meaning RIchmond can dictate the value or else they keep them. Smith is uncontracted so can leave for nothing. Dogs really don't have much leverage, not to mention the baggage that Bailey comes with (drugs, mental health) and a dodgy ACL
These guys a blowing smoke circles. What do they and the others like Barrett do for days when nothing is happening? Ping Pong?
It's embarrassing.
This gullan bloke has no idea
If A Deal Doesn't Happen, Trade Him To A Club With A Higher 1st Rounder eg: Carlton Or Melbourne.
Sure, in the fantasy land where players don't have to consent to trades.
Maybe WC could do the same with Barrass? Just trade him to the highest bidder?
Thanks for keeping us updated and is Hawthorn still going to try to get Smith ?
Have you guys been doing this show every day of the trade period even though nothing has happened?
Bloody hell.
How much water do you want to squeeze from a stone?
Baker for Pick 14 is not a better player than Smith... Neither is Rioli for Pick 6 and maybe more. Also a 29 year old Tom Barrass is "apparently" worth a first round pick and a 2nd. Smith is 6 years younger and has way more potential. The media just want us to roll over and accept a pick in the mid 20's, yet if it was the other way around they'd want us to stump up 3 first round picks... Geelong can offer up SDK or Dempsey and it's a fair deal.
Seriously, pick 17 for Bailey smith is sh1te. R1 plus a round 2 …… I’m sick of jay clarke and commentators come up with their biased opinions. How much do Geelong pay these guys.
Lmaooo, offer up SDK, fair deal? You’re out of your mind, dogs would need to give Bailey smith, a 1st round and 2nd round pick for Geelong to even consider that deal which they’d likely still deny. SDK is worth more than Smith and Geelong will look to keep him for the rest of his career just as Andrew Mackie said. Also only in your dreams Geelong would offer up Dempsey.
Bailey Smith been meh the last 2 years with 0 games played last season, suffered 2 ACL tears in the left and then an ACL tear to his right knee. Pick 15-20 and potentially a future 2nd or 3rd round pick is quite fair, Bulldogs don’t have a lot of options as he’s out of contract, first round pick around 20 is better than letting him go to the draft where they’ll get nothing for him and Geelong would probably get him anyway. At best dogs would get 1st round pick and like a future 2nd round pick
Let him go to national draft for nothing or take what you can get and move on
@@Banterboi7 I agree dude, these guys are a disgrace.
What's Bailey Smith worth? Let me dive in to a series of unfounded assumptions and attempt to pass this off as football trading expertise.
Well said.
And the irrelevant question: "Is it fair?"
Maybe we don't need daily updates on this complete nonentity of trade period.
Smith hasn’t played since 2023 , is uncontracted, only wants to play@Cats, has a history of cocaine(mental health)issues and just had a knee reconstruction . If all of those things weren’t there then Dogs could get better than late first round.
Worth More Than 17 So!, If Cats Want Him🤔 I Say 17+ Either Jhye Clark, Shannon Neale, Ollie Dempsey Or More Likely Connor O'Sullivan.
He is out of contract and leaving. The dogs may have to take unders because of that fact. The cats do not have to (and won’t) pay overs like in your silly trade proposals . Having said that, he is worth slightly more than pick 17.
been out of form, off an acl and out of contact. he can go to draft and the cats will get him for 17. no one is giving him more
This is the time of year when journalists take the opportunity to try and be super relevant
Want all the limelight on them
No one on that panel has any credibility except Dermott but even he’s a different Cat..
More accurately, it's time for the B-team to get a run.
Unfair? ..you on the real world ?? Poor Baily ..millions of $$ coz he is a simp ?
The human side of it!
What a load of rubbish.