Mongolian history says twice created own empires by Mongolia, Hunnu (Ancient Mongolia) Europeans called The Atilla from Hunnu. It’s all established 4000 years DNA process.
The original Indigenous American like Olmec, Incas, Mayan, Aztecs were all Algonquin people. They did not share the Mongolian DNA like the Native Americans / alaskan native a.k.a. Redman. Those people are a mix of Algonquin and Mongolian.
Yes, a word salad. Supposed to be about genetics, but not one word about the main haplogroup of the Mongols. Over 17 minutes of non-stop repetition. This person's talents lie in politics, not in genetics.
What is described in the video does not match the findings in Turkestan and Mongolia. While the ancestors of the Mongols still lived just northeast of the Yellow River, the ancestors of the Turks had already spread into the steppe and established relationships and ethnogenesis with other steppe peoples. All Turkic expansion in history is related to the Xiongnu Khaganate. Because the Xiongnu period, which is thought to have lasted more than 600-800 years, caused the communities in the Altai Mountains and the steppes to the east to experience ethnogenesis under the dominant Turkic culture and increase in numbers in an abundance that is incomprehensible for a steppe, and the Xiongnu Khaganate led to the endless Chinese policies and the humanitarian crisis that followed a few centuries later. When it was destroyed by corruption, the Turks spread to all corners of the steppe. And yes. There were also Mongols among the Xiongnu (Huns) and they developed cultural ties and similarities with the Turks that are still intact. Both peoples already have Transeurasian roots. Only the Rouran Khaganate and the Mongols with Genghis Khan and his first sons ruled in the steppe. Before and after is entirely related to the Turks. But this video explains the entire history of the steppe as if only the Mongols created it. Even Genghis Khan and the Rouran Khaganate are states that were able to exist with Turkic state traditions.
In ancient times, race was still greater than cultural identity. The Ottomans promoted Roman rather than Turkic identity. This Turkic identity was a slander by the anti-Ottoman forces. The anti-Indian forces would also slander the rulers of India as Mongols. The same is true for China. The anti-Manchu and Mongolian Empire forces, It will be said that the ruler is Manchu Mongolian. In order to vilify the ruler's regime, everyone uses Mongolia as a label to call for uprising. Who are the Mongols and Turks? They are not a race. They represent a nomadic force, a people who are not settled in farming and cities. mobile forces
@@mowangguiying This is nonsense what you say. The distinctions between genes, races, cultures and languages are clear. In their own inscriptions, the Chinese called the ancestors of the Turks Xiongnu, while the ancestors of the Mongols were called Dongnu. Even in the Scythian period, when the Xiongnu had not yet emerged, the Chinese gave names such as "Devil's Land" in their own language to the places where the ancestors of the Turks were found to have lived. While the Devil's Land existed, the ancestors of the Mongols still did not leave the vicinity of the Liao River. In addition, studies on genetic heritage can clearly distinguish Chinese, Mongolians and Turks. While the Ottomans embraced the continuation of Rome, they also attached themselves to Oghuz Khagan and proudly stated that they belonged to the "Kayi" tribe of the Oghuzs. Xiongnu nobles also belong to the "Alayuntlu" tribe of today's Oghuz. All of these have been identified today. To understand Turk history, it is necessary to know its culture. The superficial observations you make are in the dimension of "fan art". It is not wise to speculate about Turkish history without methodology. There are a ton of articles that are current and the accuracy of the information they provide has not changed yet. You can read it.
Mongolian history says twice created own empires by Mongolia, Hunnu (Ancient Mongolia) Europeans called The Atilla from Hunnu. It’s all established 4000 years DNA process.
The original Indigenous American like Olmec, Incas, Mayan, Aztecs were all Algonquin people. They did not share the Mongolian DNA like the Native Americans / alaskan native a.k.a. Redman. Those people are a mix of Algonquin and Mongolian.
Poorly made AI production!
Repetitive with word salad, almost uninformative . Try again.
Yes, a word salad. Supposed to be about genetics, but not one word about the main haplogroup of the Mongols. Over 17 minutes of non-stop repetition. This person's talents lie in politics, not in genetics.
Interesting however keeps repeating the same thing over and over unfortunately. Possibly to make the video so at some point I turned it off.
What is described in the video does not match the findings in Turkestan and Mongolia. While the ancestors of the Mongols still lived just northeast of the Yellow River, the ancestors of the Turks had already spread into the steppe and established relationships and ethnogenesis with other steppe peoples. All Turkic expansion in history is related to the Xiongnu Khaganate. Because the Xiongnu period, which is thought to have lasted more than 600-800 years, caused the communities in the Altai Mountains and the steppes to the east to experience ethnogenesis under the dominant Turkic culture and increase in numbers in an abundance that is incomprehensible for a steppe, and the Xiongnu Khaganate led to the endless Chinese policies and the humanitarian crisis that followed a few centuries later. When it was destroyed by corruption, the Turks spread to all corners of the steppe. And yes. There were also Mongols among the Xiongnu (Huns) and they developed cultural ties and similarities with the Turks that are still intact. Both peoples already have Transeurasian roots. Only the Rouran Khaganate and the Mongols with Genghis Khan and his first sons ruled in the steppe. Before and after is entirely related to the Turks. But this video explains the entire history of the steppe as if only the Mongols created it. Even Genghis Khan and the Rouran Khaganate are states that were able to exist with Turkic state traditions.
In ancient times, race was still greater than cultural identity. The Ottomans promoted Roman rather than Turkic identity. This Turkic identity was a slander by the anti-Ottoman forces. The anti-Indian forces would also slander the rulers of India as Mongols. The same is true for China. The anti-Manchu and Mongolian Empire forces, It will be said that the ruler is Manchu Mongolian. In order to vilify the ruler's regime, everyone uses Mongolia as a label to call for uprising. Who are the Mongols and Turks? They are not a race. They represent a nomadic force, a people who are not settled in farming and cities. mobile forces
@@mowangguiying This is nonsense what you say. The distinctions between genes, races, cultures and languages are clear. In their own inscriptions, the Chinese called the ancestors of the Turks Xiongnu, while the ancestors of the Mongols were called Dongnu. Even in the Scythian period, when the Xiongnu had not yet emerged, the Chinese gave names such as "Devil's Land" in their own language to the places where the ancestors of the Turks were found to have lived. While the Devil's Land existed, the ancestors of the Mongols still did not leave the vicinity of the Liao River. In addition, studies on genetic heritage can clearly distinguish Chinese, Mongolians and Turks. While the Ottomans embraced the continuation of Rome, they also attached themselves to Oghuz Khagan and proudly stated that they belonged to the "Kayi" tribe of the Oghuzs. Xiongnu nobles also belong to the "Alayuntlu" tribe of today's Oghuz. All of these have been identified today. To understand Turk history, it is necessary to know its culture. The superficial observations you make are in the dimension of "fan art". It is not wise to speculate about Turkish history without methodology. There are a ton of articles that are current and the accuracy of the information they provide has not changed yet. You can read it.
Тэнэг осмон чамд түүх байхгүй