Why Germany Doesn't Buy the F-35

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.ค. 2024
  • I (try to) answer a question I get asked a lot.
    - Get our Book -
    Army Regulation Medium Panzer Company 1941 - www.hdv470-7.com/
    - Get Your Aircraft Model -
    Get great models here: airmodels.net/?aff=144 (Affiliate link)
    - Support -
    Patreon: / milavhistory
    Channel Memberships: / @militaryaviationhistory
    PayPal: www.paypal.me/BismarckYT
    - Social Media -
    Twitter: / milavhistory
    Instagram: / milaviationhistory
    Facebook: / militaryaviationhistory
    - Sources -
    A. Shalal, Germany asks U.S. for classified briefing on F-35 fighter, Reuters, 17.05.2020 www.reuters.com/article/us-lo...
    A. Shalal & S. Siebold, Tornado replacement must be fifth generation, Reuters, 08.11.2017, www.reuters.com/article/us-ge...
    Atomwaffenfrei, available at: www.atomwaffenfrei.de/home.html
    Augengeradeaus, Merkposten: Airbus sieht Eurofighter auch bei Electronic Warfare als Tornado-Nachfolger (Nachtrag), 05.11.2019, augengeradeaus.net/2019/11/me...
    Augengeradeaus, Luftwaffe bekommt neue Eurofighter als Ersatz für erste Generation (Nachtrag), 05.11.2020, augengeradeaus.net/2020/11/lu...
    Die Presse, Deutschland sucht den "Super-Fighter", 03.02.2019, www.diepresse.com/5573129/deu...
    D. Perry, FCAS workshare plan sparks German union concerns, 17.02.2021, www.flightglobal.com/defence/...
    DSCA, Belgium - F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft, 18.01.2018, www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/...
    H. Brauß & Dr. C. Mölling, Germany's Role in NATO Nuclear Sharing, 03.02.2020, dgap.org/en/research/publicat...
    ICAN, AVV - Warum ist Deutschland noch nicht dabei?, 17.02.2021,www.icanw.de/neuigkeiten/avv-...
    J. Stoltenberg, Germany’s support for nuclear sharing is vital, 11.05.2020, www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/op...
    J. Bronk, German Decision to Split Tornado Replacement is a Poor One, 26.03.2020, rusi.org/publication/rusi-def...
    J. Trevithick, Watch An F-35 Drop A B61 Nuclear Bomb, 23.11.2020, www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone...
    Greenpeace, Atomwaffen in Deutschland, 21.10.2020, www.greenpeace.de/themen/umwe...
    Greenpeace, Greenpeace-Umfrage zu Atomwaffen, 07.2020, www.greenpeace.de/sites/www.g...
    M. Morcinek, Über einen Kampfjet gestolpert? Inspekteur der Luftwaffe muss gehen, nTv, 16.03.2018, www.n-tv.de/politik/Inspekteu...
    Reuters, Norway receives first F-35 fighter jet, 10.11.2017, www.reuters.com/article/us-no...
    S. Sprenger, Airbus tells French lawmakers there’s no ‘Plan B’ for FCAS, 17.03.2021, www.defensenews.com/global/eu...
    S. Roblin, The Air Force admits the F-35 fighter jet costs too much, 07.03.2021, www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion...
    Spiegel, Haushaltsausschuss genehmigt Kauf neuer Eurofighter, 05.11.2020, www.spiegel.de/politik/deutsc...
    Tagesschau, Vertrag in Kraft - ohne Deutschland, 22.01.2021, www.tagesschau.de/inland/atom...
    V. Insinna, The price of the F-35 has been falling, 23.07.2020, www.defensenews.com/industry/...
    Vergabeblog, Bundeswehr: Eurofighter für 5,5 Mrd. EUR, 10.11.2020, www.vergabeblog.de/2020-11-10...
    Thumbnail: DoD
    - Timecodes -
    00:00 - Intro
    00:37 - A plane. We Need a plane!
    02:05 - F-35: Favorite Outcast
    06:04 - Scary self promotion: 60 intermission
    07:03 - German military procurement
    07:44 - Issue 1 The Industry
    09:22 - Issue 2 The American Dollar
    14:40 - Issue 3 Nukes!
    17:38 - Issue 4 The Bundeswehr
    21:45 - Hot potato
    - Audio -
    Music and Sfx from Epidemic Sound
    - Disclaimer -
    Description includes affiliate links
    The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement.

ความคิดเห็น • 8K

  • @MilitaryAviationHistory
    @MilitaryAviationHistory  3 ปีที่แล้ว +340

    Had to shorten the source names on this one since apparently you can only have 5000 characters in the description... #usingsourcesonYTproblem

    • @rocketman1058
      @rocketman1058 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Price? For real? Grandma's Eurofighter are 30% pricier.

    • @frankbarnwell____
      @frankbarnwell____ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'd like you to feel defended.... F35 is expensive. but then again fa18s with .... themselves. efs, whatnot can handle Russians and Chinese

    • @Jon.A.Scholt
      @Jon.A.Scholt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Those "y'all's" thrown in there by the American Salesman character gave me a good laugh. I've never heard a German speaker attempting an American accent and using y'all. From an American I can tell you it was wunderbar!

    • @ajc5479
      @ajc5479 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Perhaps another reason for buying European is the possibility that America won't be a reliable partner in the future.

    • @jeffk464
      @jeffk464 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The plane to buy might be the KF-21

  • @phantomkate6
    @phantomkate6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +614

    I always appreciate a nuanced and detailed look at something because issues are almost never as simple as they appear in headlines.

    • @MilitaryAviationHistory
      @MilitaryAviationHistory  3 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      Thanks very much!

    • @GF1045Prime
      @GF1045Prime 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Same, I prefer his video than most as he is very measured.

    • @BenTrem42
      @BenTrem42 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Before coming across your _"never as simple"_ I wrote this as my comment:
      *Do we know **_what we don't know_** about it all?*

    • @Farweasel
      @Farweasel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I was background aware in a vague way Germany 'has issues' with its defence and getting folk to buy in.
      In fact most Western states seem to have large and growing percentages of their populations who are very simplistic & niave in their grasp of geo-political reality.
      I actually have mixed feelings about Ursula von der Layen sacking an expert Air General. On the one hand he should be the SME. On the other anyone who knows theior history knows Lockheed sold Germany F104 Starfighters not because it was good (it was a deathtrap) but because Lockheed bribed senior Luftwaffe & Political players.
      And don't forget who builds the F35.
      Now here's a dimension not picked up in the Video
      The USA has slashed its F35 orders. Its buying more uprated F15s instead. Why? Partly cost F35 are roughly three times as expensive to maintain. But more worryingly, because F15s are apparently *much* more reliable.
      As the Royal Navy what they think about F35 delivery schedules for instance.
      And you might get sounded out would Germany like to buy a couple of undersized aircraft carriers designed for a plane which barely works.

    • @paavobergmann4920
      @paavobergmann4920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@Farweasel Yes, but again, I got to learn that even the Starfighter desaster itself wasn´t as easy or clear cut as hindsight or tabloid headlines suggests. The F-104 actually wasn´t a bad plane at all. It was the F-104G variant that had issues, for some specifically german problems: The F-104 was a dedicated interceptor, but germany wanted, again, the egg-laying-wool-milk-pig, and demanded the thing be stuffed with gadgets to become a multirole fighter AND attack-bomber. Then they added some more european gadgets to the american platform, that were not 100% compatible. Then they had a sophisticated, delicate racing-car of a plane, but not enough hangars, so they left them to rot out on the tarmac like some old tractor. And finally, the training of both air- and ground crews was too limited. And it was this complete layer-cake of tossups that led to 1/3 of the F-104Gs hitting the dirt. The F-104 in and of itself really was a fabulous plane, with an accident ratio well within the range of contemporary fighters. The Luftwaffe-F104Gs sucked. Big time.

  • @MrRinoHunter
    @MrRinoHunter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Revisiting this video March 14, 2022... Every TV station in Germany is announcing that Germans will buy F35 😗

    • @H.P206
      @H.P206 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Revisiting this Video on june 23 of 2023

  • @trentpetersen443
    @trentpetersen443 3 ปีที่แล้ว +132

    Germany missed the F35 kickstarter discount

    • @davidhimmelsbach557
      @davidhimmelsbach557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      While witty, you're spot on. That really is the hang-up.

    • @thegreathadoken6808
      @thegreathadoken6808 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Makes up for all the penalties they never miss.

    • @brantregare
      @brantregare 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The kickstarter discount was not that attractive. The kickstarter partners were told to fork over more dough to get access to a crippled version of the aircraft. Not a good deal at all. It is like getting someone else to pay for the cake that you get to eat.

    • @davidhimmelsbach557
      @davidhimmelsbach557 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@brantregare The US does not sell crippled aircraft to its NATO partners. It's the USSR that was famed for 'monkey models.'
      Admittedly, the exported machines are not 100% equivalent to US machines. But they are not dogs. The Israelis accept US exports -- and they don't do so badly with -- what you term as -- cripples.
      The UK is not getting 'dogs.'
      The US wants its NATO partners to have un-beatable fighters, bombers, and everything else. It does not figure to -- or fear -- fighting its NATO allies under any scenario.
      The weirdness of the Turks: Russian S-400s will obviously not bother the Russian air force. So their only purpose must be to shoot at NATO aircraft.
      What kind of crazy tyrant pays Big Bucks for weapons that only ever can work if aimed at his allies ?
      Yet, the S-400 does not work against F-35s. This is rather obvious from the Syrian strikes by the Israelis. No-one is bubbling up with what the weaknesses of the S-400 are -- but the Israelis have figured on some work-arounds -- that's for sure.

    • @hsy831
      @hsy831 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao

  • @Lapantouflemagic0
    @Lapantouflemagic0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +141

    "in germany everyone keeps playing hot potato with defense issues, delaying decisions for decades"
    meanwhile in france : we'll make a new carrier to replace the old one. it will be almost twice bigger and nuclear.
    half of everyone : eh, sure i guess.
    the other half : can't we just keep both ?

    • @theflourman6219
      @theflourman6219 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Waste of money Germans still will walk through Spineless France like everytime

    • @scottessery100
      @scottessery100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@theflourman6219 it’s ok. They have lots of spare subs now Australia don’t want them

    • @michaelkuschnefsky362
      @michaelkuschnefsky362 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Don't we already have enough other problems in the world. Why destroy the money in the military, what is more urgent is climate change and also overpopulation. Solutions have to be found and the money poured into it and not into the military. And as a German I can only say after two world wars and all the injustice that came into this world from our side, it is enough. Never again war. The world's problems have never been solved with weapons.

    • @Lapantouflemagic0
      @Lapantouflemagic0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      ​@@michaelkuschnefsky362 sorry for the sarcasm, but the ships are not _made_ out of money, as if 100€ bills were glued together to form the hull and never replaced. that money is not destroyed, it is the paycheck of thousands of workers, it maintains precious know-hows and industrial capabilities.
      War will inevitably come back and the one who wins will be the one who is ready. like it or not, some countries _want_ war. when turkey decide to invade greek islands because long story short, they want more, someone will need to go and kick the crap out of them.
      hugging trees and saying "please be nice" never stopped a column of tanks, 500kg guided warheads however...

    • @shounakganguly5441
      @shounakganguly5441 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Lapantouflemagic0, you don't need to spend a stupid amount of money to win wars. Example: Vietnam, Afghanistan. 9/11 was done with box cutters and knives. Also, do you know what stops tanks? Kill the people who are ordering the strikes. Kill the presidents, leaders, and army commanders. Next time a war happens, the first attack should be on the family of the president. Kill some of his children and take some away, war will be over in 2 days.

  • @grindcorejoe6661
    @grindcorejoe6661 3 ปีที่แล้ว +747

    Just take some old Nuke-Tornados, trench them with some anti-rust agent and put them into a glas-box with a sign "Break glas at Defcon 2"

    • @rollerrollerichson6258
      @rollerrollerichson6258 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      I like this idea 🤣

    • @steveperreira5850
      @steveperreira5850 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      I kind of like that. Nukes are the best deterrent of all, and cost-effective, you only need a few of them and the ability to deliver, delivered just one and your enemy is terrified that you can do that.
      Remember the west German boy who flew his Cessna 150 and landed at the Kremlin in the midst of the Cold War? That was funny.

    • @beefgoat80
      @beefgoat80 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nuke all the hummies!!!

    • @chukkie0001
      @chukkie0001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @UCx64e7lDY8azYXWLARZSqpw They have uranium ore and enrichment facilities and almost a breeder reactor. These days its not that hard to make a bomb.

    • @spindash64
      @spindash64 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@steveperreira5850
      Surprised that thing could take off carrying the weight of his massive balls

  • @jacobbaumgardner3406
    @jacobbaumgardner3406 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1659

    A German trying to imitate a German. Now I've seen everything.

    • @conveyor2
      @conveyor2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +156

      Someone with a German name remarking that a German is imitating a German. Now I've seen everything.

    • @jacobbaumgardner3406
      @jacobbaumgardner3406 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@conveyor2 lol, sorry to say I ain't no German. My name actually originates from Switzerland.

    • @janrobertbos
      @janrobertbos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@conveyor2 roflmao!!!

    • @janrobertbos
      @janrobertbos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      @@jacobbaumgardner3406 yeah, right, they still speak German when they are called Baumgardner.........LOLLOL

    • @ron9320
      @ron9320 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@jacobbaumgardner3406 an what’s the difference?

  • @Canada-_
    @Canada-_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    It's scary how similar Germany's and Canada's situation is with regards to military procurement.

    • @jasonpeters6600
      @jasonpeters6600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Canada is protected by the USA. They do not need a military… Germany is pretty close to that with US military bases in Germany…

    • @cvjanzen550
      @cvjanzen550 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly right.

    • @Canada-_
      @Canada-_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@jasonpeters6600 what has that have to do with military procurement? and Canada's likeness to Germany? and imo Canada does have a need for a military but that's just my opinion.

    • @jasonpeters6600
      @jasonpeters6600 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Canada-_ now your just being naive.. neither Canada nor Germany need 5 th gen fighters, they are already protected by them… try to attack Canada, and see who retaliates first, Canada or USA…

    • @Canada-_
      @Canada-_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@jasonpeters6600 ahh, well I don't disagree thus why Canada dropped the F-35 and are looking at late 4th gen fighters, and again not here to talk about Defense agreements here to talk about military Aviation cause its cool as shit. Thx

  • @Mautiks
    @Mautiks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +243

    Too expensive for Germany’s annual defense budget of like €3,000.

    • @bryburiya2709
      @bryburiya2709 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@looinrims *3

    • @phantom4E2
      @phantom4E2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      same for spain, our goverment hates the country

    • @ScubaShark--8964
      @ScubaShark--8964 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bryburiya2709 0.30

    • @cameraman1234567890a
      @cameraman1234567890a 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@phantom4E2 Spending more money on welfare and things that actually improve people’s lives instead of massive military spending when they’re already backed up by nato doesn’t mean they hate the country

    • @yixinmei5854
      @yixinmei5854 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Your govt love your country. Buy less weapons, save them for welfare, let the Americans do the dirty works. That is what we Chinese dream of , but you are complaining about that.

  • @cattledog901
    @cattledog901 3 ปีที่แล้ว +464

    "Murican Bismark isn't real, he can't hurt you."
    Murican Bismark: 2:27

    • @mgweible8162
      @mgweible8162 3 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      So...Nicholas Cage?

    • @protonneutron9046
      @protonneutron9046 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ???????????

    • @derlasercrafterwally4342
      @derlasercrafterwally4342 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@protonneutron9046 his outfit I guess

    • @wiryantirta
      @wiryantirta 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      its the Bismark Lockheed salesman chad vs the Bismark german defense ministry virgin

    • @spazmodicusrex6629
      @spazmodicusrex6629 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@derlasercrafterwally4342 He said "Y'all".

  • @cjpreach
    @cjpreach 3 ปีที่แล้ว +155

    "A check list of political buzzword Bingo." What a great phrase.

    • @hugopepe1722
      @hugopepe1722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      he is just polite, it actually is "bullshit bingo"

    • @hdjfjd8
      @hdjfjd8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      political correctness in short

  • @spanpt
    @spanpt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Great commentary-thanks so much Chris!

  • @LibertyFirst1789
    @LibertyFirst1789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    The only thing more expensive than winning a war is losing one.

    • @wadebradley7388
      @wadebradley7388 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Excellent point

    • @bjjace1
      @bjjace1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You think they would know.

    • @Belisarius277
      @Belisarius277 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      really, why is germany's economy a powerhouse after losing two consecutive wars then? the only thing more expensive than winning a war is preparing like it is going to be like the last one and having to conclude after 40+ years that it is not coming. We are discussing a piloted plane that is already obsolete. Ever heard of drones? Perhaps ask the armenians how their superior tank force got annihilated by essentially RC planes. Good luck with your "last war"-doctrine

    • @NeoEngineCorp
      @NeoEngineCorp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Belisarius277 Germany's economy was a wreck after the First World War, leading to the rise of Nazis. Germany was completely destroyed after the Second World War, but this time it was built back up again afterwards by the West and Soviets to serve their own purpose. So the answer to your first question would be "Because the victors wishes it so."
      Piloted planes are not obsolete. The Armenians screwed up by not investing heavier on air defense systems, which was also relevant in "last wars."

    • @LibertyFirst1789
      @LibertyFirst1789 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Belisarius277 I'm guessing you have never heard of the Marshall Plan. As the resident expert, I would expect you to be at least somewhat familiar with the fundamentals of the topics you discuss.
      Drones? It's that easy, huh? Just say "drones" and you magically win! Do some research on where we are with drones before you make comments.

  • @g54b95
    @g54b95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +293

    As a GI stationed in Germany in the early 90's with a multi-system TV, I can testify to the fact that Germans have a sense of humor.

    • @robstone4537
      @robstone4537 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Compared to Russians, Germans are fucking hilarious.

    • @aussieausdeutschland4245
      @aussieausdeutschland4245 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They definitely are funny.

    • @joephysics5469
      @joephysics5469 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Reminds me of what Robin Williams said - "Why are there no German comedians? They killed all of the funny people..." He did have a bit of a dark side at times.

    • @BIOSHOCKFOXX
      @BIOSHOCKFOXX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Tdan Kendros When the theme is about humor, and someone strolls in saying how "something else" is better elsewhere that isn't humor.
      For the record, it is opinionates and subjective which country women are better looking. While I do admit that Russian females are beautiful, my own country's females are beautiful too, as well as females in other countries too. Some do not have that many beautiful females.

    • @paul8158
      @paul8158 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Tdan Kendros Yes maybe hotter, but colder! I would go for a scandinavian having the choice between all three,

  • @michaelrivera131
    @michaelrivera131 3 ปีที่แล้ว +864

    The F-35 clearly isn't over-engineered enough for Germany.

    • @yeoshenghong4802
      @yeoshenghong4802 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Because German relationship with Russia is good with pipeline buying Russia oil

    • @felix25ize
      @felix25ize 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@looinrims The Craptor ? No more produced, with good reasons for that...

    • @felix25ize
      @felix25ize 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@looinrims F-35 is even worse; needs to be protected by an entire fleet of real fighters... and the programm will cost overall 1 trillion and half $. The biggest scandal in the history of U.S.A. !

    • @amerularif230
      @amerularif230 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@felix25ize overall cost mate, n the expensive sensor bla bla..so its not suprise the cost so high. But at the end of the day, every nation buy a fighter based on their doctrine and budget

    • @felix25ize
      @felix25ize 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@amerularif230 Yes, but they can buy good or bad fighters; btw, F-35 is not a good fighter, not even a real fighter.

  • @kaamfiniti
    @kaamfiniti 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    they’re gonna bring back the ME-262

    • @TheRetirednavy92
      @TheRetirednavy92 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'll buy one.

    • @patrickjones1061
      @patrickjones1061 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thats where the US and the world got the jet engine from!!!

    • @cakeman7364
      @cakeman7364 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@patrickjones1061 no not really, the us and the Brits were already working on the jet engines

    • @marcherbst4041
      @marcherbst4041 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cakeman7364 Oh, really...
      What US or British manufacturers were working on jet engines, before they encountered the ME-262?
      And why bother with launching operation Paperclip then?

    • @cakeman7364
      @cakeman7364 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@marcherbst4041since the German were the first to implement the jet fighter successfully, yes the us and UK were first but the engines were very primitive

  • @simonpaine91
    @simonpaine91 3 ปีที่แล้ว +260

    Think the issue is the Germans hate the idea of buying or relying on foreign technology, especially if such has to come from the US , Uk , or god forbid from France ,

    • @gantulgaganhuyag717
      @gantulgaganhuyag717 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Hahaha good one! Specially the last part

    • @davidquak4398
      @davidquak4398 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Rafale is amazing.

    • @JeffLeChefski
      @JeffLeChefski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Yes, except their current fighters are joint European designs....Eurofighter Typhoon and Panavia Tornado.

    • @aalb1873
      @aalb1873 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      No Germany is actually strictly allied with France. Germany don’t buy F 35 because don’t want irritate France.

    • @JeffLeChefski
      @JeffLeChefski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@aalb1873 France is part of NATO. What year are you living in?

  • @mcd3379
    @mcd3379 3 ปีที่แล้ว +374

    Germany is waiting for development to be completed on the Messerschmitt 2.0

    • @TrakThora
      @TrakThora 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      That would be great.

    • @thanakonpraepanich4284
      @thanakonpraepanich4284 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Will they finish the job before the war start?

    • @haroldomiyaura912
      @haroldomiyaura912 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I support a Messerschimitt Me262 2.0

    • @fiddledotgoth
      @fiddledotgoth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I think I prefer the Germans being reluctant to take military decisions...

    • @MrHeidiHigh
      @MrHeidiHigh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      We need a good Groundattacker so we need an Stuka-Update 💪

  • @fredmaughan5669
    @fredmaughan5669 3 ปีที่แล้ว +356

    F-35 asks the F-22: "Does this stealth treatment make my ass look big?"

    • @unclejoeoakland
      @unclejoeoakland 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Thick thighs- and stealth- save lives.

    • @Killerpixel11
      @Killerpixel11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Fat Amy isn't ashamed.

    • @ramonsrgravidez7221
      @ramonsrgravidez7221 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ask f15x or new typhoons

    • @SkinPeeleR
      @SkinPeeleR 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Stealth is so 20th century. If you can see,touch or hear it then you can track it. Use scrambling and electronic warfare. Create a big electronic black hole and you can fly a B52 unseen.
      Electronic "window".

    • @KondorDCS
      @KondorDCS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      F22: No, your VTOL engines make you fat, draggy and unmanouvreable, but it's not your fault. You are just a bad design.

  • @MietoK
    @MietoK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Meanwhile in Finland. “Here are parameters for test program, send one of each western models and well have some war games.” 6 months later “Ok, F-35 won, send 64 of those.”

  • @phillB
    @phillB 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice job laying out the issues. Thank you for your perspective.

  • @saacexe
    @saacexe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +148

    I love these videos, learning about luftwaffe politics is a welcome break from the RAF budget stuff im used to. Keep them coming!

    • @MilitaryAviationHistory
      @MilitaryAviationHistory  3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Thanks !

    • @haaaltstopp658
      @haaaltstopp658 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @William Mulvaney Atomwaffen means Nuclear Weapons.

    • @foty8679
      @foty8679 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @William Mulvaney You write it together as "Atomwaffen" not sepearted.

    • @chickenfishhybrid44
      @chickenfishhybrid44 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao

    • @jeebus6263
      @jeebus6263 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @William Mulvaney, unless you're in Belgium, then it's AtomWaffle!

  • @bryanaveri6816
    @bryanaveri6816 3 ปีที่แล้ว +113

    The Luftwaffe was still using the F-104 for test purposes until 22 May 1991. So Germany is a little different with its aircraft purchases.

    • @fazeobama8872
      @fazeobama8872 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      we got leopard tank we got puma ifv which do ya want

    • @ravenmusic6392
      @ravenmusic6392 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Also F-4’s until 2010. To be fair the F-104 was upgraded for the Germans and had AIM-7 missiles but yeah, Germany has always had a fairly old Air Force but good ground based air defences.

    • @nunyabidness3075
      @nunyabidness3075 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      IMO, there is no replacement for 104 for Germany. It was stupid dangerous to pilots, but amazing as an interceptor.

    • @bryanaveri6816
      @bryanaveri6816 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nunyabidness3075 Kelly Johnson was always pushing the envelope....

    • @e30kitty
      @e30kitty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But they were not used for other things. We got Tornados, Phantoms and Mig 29s before we moved to the Eurofighter (what is a ugly bird) :D Why no F-35? It had no good press, it's a single engine plane and we also like to design our own stuff like we did with the EF, Tornado and Tiger helicopter.

  • @liviuconstantin9960
    @liviuconstantin9960 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    US: "So, are you in or are you out for the F-35?"
    Germany: "Let me sink about it....let me sink....let me ..."

    • @quantum340
      @quantum340 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Reminds me of an radio exchange between a sinking English mechant vessel and the German coast guard:
      Merchant vessel: "We are sinking! We are sinking! Over!"
      German coast guard: "Zis is ze Coast Guard. Vat are you sinking about? Over."

    • @liviuconstantin9960
      @liviuconstantin9960 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@quantum340 Yes, I remember that funny commercial.

    • @michaelhart7569
      @michaelhart7569 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@quantum340 Did you see the one with the Germanic-looking nuclear family of four in their car, foot-tapping to a radio song with lyrics that are unrepeatable here? It's fantastic.

    • @quantum340
      @quantum340 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelhart7569 Alas, I do not know that one.

  • @AGS363
    @AGS363 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Well, this aged poorly....

  • @Nibb31
    @Nibb31 3 ปีที่แล้ว +171

    The Eurofighter might cost more than the F-35 option, but the difference is that the money is spent domestically and it maintains domestic technological skills and industrial capability. Also, maintaining a single aircraft instead of two reduces the operational costs. Sometimes, those reasons make it worth paying more.

    • @simonm1447
      @simonm1447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      The Eurofigher is going to be replaced in the 2040s by the FCAS (at least this is the current plan). A F-35 purchase would jeopardize the FCAS program, because it is too capable to get replaced in 20 years.
      The Eurofighter however needs the FCAS program, because a non stealth aircraft will be unusable in 20 years.
      They always had more than one aircraft type, they had Tornados and F-4s in the past, the F-4 was replaced by the Eurofighter. Only one fighter is not a good idea, if the aircraft is grounded because of technical reasons (which can happen) you loose the complete fleet.

    • @zeitgeistx5239
      @zeitgeistx5239 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      You miss that the Eurofighter and the F-35 are not equals and generations apart.

    • @tonikotinurmi9012
      @tonikotinurmi9012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Some are kind of afraid of hidden kill-switches in their planes. Be it small weakened part of electronics on planes sold abroad or programmed one, reason to fear such is why _some_ countries are out of the race (here locally).

    • @RaGeAlucard
      @RaGeAlucard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      and foreign country´s would get an inferior F35 compared to US

    • @simonm1447
      @simonm1447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@RaGeAlucard yes, but export versions are often inferior, the same with German subs .
      The export F-35 is still a capable aircraft.

  • @panzeri209
    @panzeri209 3 ปีที่แล้ว +139

    Germans: secretly making the flying Bismarck😎

    • @teaandmedals
      @teaandmedals 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Space Battleship Yamato has entered the chat.

    • @sujalshetty5986
      @sujalshetty5986 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      the flying ratte

    • @davidmacdonald1695
      @davidmacdonald1695 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In which case they will achieve nothing and get shot down.

    • @sujalshetty5986
      @sujalshetty5986 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@davidmacdonald1695 u must be fun at parties

    • @rexmopser7152
      @rexmopser7152 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@davidmacdonald1695 well if you use the ship bismark as benchmark for that statement the ship blowed the flagship of the british navy up (hms hood) a naval country that where superior on the seas for centurys and got killed in a unwinnable battle vs hundreds of planes and a full fleet in a hunt for days
      and the biggest archivment the ship bismark was important enought to get a own sabaton song

  • @oneknight55
    @oneknight55 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I appreciate how you can explain complex topics in a clear and concise way. Thank you.

  • @OneMoreDesu
    @OneMoreDesu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Looking back on this now is a good discussion in itself

  • @wwjjss33
    @wwjjss33 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Really excellent, comprehensive, and nuanced discussion of this topic! The Algorithm suggested your video and I am so glad to have stumbled across your content. Hopefully you also have content auf Deutsch.
    You have earned a new subscriber!

  • @protosszocker5678
    @protosszocker5678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    Damn last time I was this early the luftwaffe still used messerschmitt and focker-wulfs.

    • @Damian-03x3
      @Damian-03x3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Focke-Wulf best wulf.

    • @romanthenumeral9497
      @romanthenumeral9497 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      messerschmitt is good shit

    • @Damian-03x3
      @Damian-03x3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@romanthenumeral9497 262 is cool.
      109 isn't really my thing personally (that windshield looks awful)
      But yeah messerschmitt overall is cool.

    • @luftwaffe8086
      @luftwaffe8086 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only k 4 bf 109 is cool

    • @Damian-03x3
      @Damian-03x3 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@luftwaffe8086 You mean F4? G2 is also cool.

  • @ericwright8498
    @ericwright8498 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    2.30 - as they say, the German sense of humour is no laughing matter:)

  • @shayhannon1873
    @shayhannon1873 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    always informative, well researched and 360 view points of all subject matters presented. Well done, a pleasure to enjoy all your video's

  • @matteotivan3414
    @matteotivan3414 3 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    That salesman and buyer clip made my day

    • @DirtyHairy1
      @DirtyHairy1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      next: MAH pivots to Military Procurement Satire MPS

    • @wiryantirta
      @wiryantirta 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      the clothing decision for the Luftwaffe desk jockey is even funnier. I swear my uncle has a similar green vest

  • @Jo-xx2rd
    @Jo-xx2rd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    7:25 “Now im going to be very clear..... alot of this is somewhat unclear. lol
    Made my day haha

  • @AClark-gs5gl
    @AClark-gs5gl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I think the ME-262 is still a beautiful, awesome fighter design! A design that was/is light years ahead of its time! Give me a couple of the most powerful turbo fan jet engines with thrust vector vectoring that it can handle, 4 sidewinders, a brrrrt gun, a cannon and I'd be set.

    • @WaukWarrior360
      @WaukWarrior360 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The Me 262 wasn't "light years" ahead of its time. Every allied nation had a Jet fighter.
      The P-80 Shooting Star specifically was a superior aircraft compared to the Me 262

    • @darthsaren6519
      @darthsaren6519 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      clearly Joshua , yep, of course, everyone had jets ...right. christ im getting tired of this western aura of superiority. Yes you wont the war , but you might at least admit in terms of tech Germany was way ahead in so many areas

    • @crabbyjungle5670
      @crabbyjungle5670 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@WaukWarrior360 American reports literally call the 262 equal,if not superior to the p80

    • @WaukWarrior360
      @WaukWarrior360 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@darthsaren6519 I don't have to "admit that Germany was ahead in tech in so many areas" because they weren't.
      They had good glass optics, made good standardized bunkers, synthetic fuels etc which I will admit. But in most other areas their reputation has been vastly overstated

    • @WaukWarrior360
      @WaukWarrior360 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@crabbyjungle5670 There's literally no American reports saying the Me-262 was superior or even equal to the P-80.

  • @andrzejwitowiak1353
    @andrzejwitowiak1353 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    When in doubt compare the total cost of flight hour for each. Then check how much of that cost can be paid to home industry.

  • @patriot03062
    @patriot03062 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I love the model airplanes behind you. I built so many when I was younger. Air Models website down below. Ok. Danke Schoen

  • @jester1663
    @jester1663 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You have great videos. Full of awesome information and very entertaining. I always wondered where you got those model aircraft in the back ground. Keep up the great work!

  • @MrMasterSpam
    @MrMasterSpam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really enjoyed this discussion!

  • @snikwadRR
    @snikwadRR 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow. Just stumbled across your video. Absolutely loved it.

  • @JasonDykstraMT
    @JasonDykstraMT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +121

    The last time I was this early, the skies over Malta were still defended by three Gladiators

    • @elixir4487
      @elixir4487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      The last time I was this early, this joke was kind a fresh

    • @worstchoresmadesimple6259
      @worstchoresmadesimple6259 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      and copious amounts of Pimms.

    • @5555petros
      @5555petros 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I always loved that story. It's like Ace Combat come to life!

    • @localbod
      @localbod 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ..... and the German aircraft were sporting some extra markings. 😉

    • @woooster71
      @woooster71 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maximus, Juba & Hagen?? Wow, you were early!!

  • @MrGeoffHilton
    @MrGeoffHilton 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    You kept me captivated for 23 mins subscribed. Ps spent 1980s in RAF mostly working with Tornado GM/TFR, its kind of nice that the old kite is still working, it wasn't new back then, probably 15 years old, still I'm sure it has been updated over the last 4 decades.

    • @damedusa5107
      @damedusa5107 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Apparently the German tornado fleet is in a right mess, many planes are not air worthy and parts are becoming hard to come by.

    • @mattheww.6232
      @mattheww.6232 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@damedusa5107 It's getting to be 50 years old. Continuing to try and use them would be like using bolt actions in a cold war battlefield. It's not a modern weapon.

    • @damedusa5107
      @damedusa5107 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mattheww.6232 the uk fleet was in good condition even at retirement due to hood maintenance but due to budget issues the Germans haven’t been able to maintain all the fleet as well as they would like. So definitely needs replacement. Would say even now, it’s still an excellent low level bomber as it’s a specialised plane for that role. Multiroles are always compromises.

  • @joebellido6700
    @joebellido6700 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very very good reporting, comments and opinion. Very professional 😊👍

  • @hammadsheikh6032
    @hammadsheikh6032 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a difficult topic in Germany. You did a great job giving an overview! Thank you.

  • @Larpy1933
    @Larpy1933 3 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Well-done and thanks. Military procurement in Canada is embarrassingly slow and non-decisive - and that’s being kind. The perspective on the German situation that you’ve provided gives me some balance, although little room for hope here in Canada.

    • @sifis172
      @sifis172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      why does canada need warplanes?

    • @marcofava
      @marcofava 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i'm of the mind that Canada should definitely go for the Gripen E/F for their next fighter, it is basically tailor made for them.

    • @marcofava
      @marcofava 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@sifis172 for the same reason that Belgium, Netherlands and Portugal do because it's better to have them and not need them than to need them and not have them

    • @marcofava
      @marcofava 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @William Mulvaney just ask the Australians what happen with the Emus, and those birds could not even fly

    • @marcofava
      @marcofava 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @William Mulvaney As far as cars go i never heard anyone complain about SAAB's even had a friend that bought what was to be the last generation of the SAAb 9-5 about 10-12 years ago, but when it comes to SAAB Aerospace the only thing they have to envy national companies like Dassault, Alenia, Lockheed Martin, Boeing or Sukhoi is the fact that the mother nations of those countries pump a lot more into defense than SAAB gets.
      When it comes to the quality and performance of their equipment it's right up there with the best of them, plus as far as Canada is concerned the Gripen fits their requirements perfectly, a super cruise capable single engine multirole fighter that can be integrated into NORAD Systems and NATO (And really whatever system you want) with full sensor fusion as well as it being designed with low maintenance costs as well as low lifetime costs and it is designed for cold/arctic environments and climates, on top of that SAAB usually sweetens the pot with a couple of AWACS systems and a full technological transfer.
      There are Swedish Gripens kicking around with Eurofighter, Rafale, F-35 and F-22 kill markings (Earned in various multilateral excericses) and as far as all reports go the Gripen is a great aircraft to fly and a scary one to fly against.

  • @Jowjoejoe
    @Jowjoejoe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +245

    They just looked at Lockheed Martin on the plane and was like: Nein not this again(F104 flashback)

    • @spartanx9293
      @spartanx9293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      How the f-35 is extremely surviveable

    • @randomuser5443
      @randomuser5443 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      @@spartanx9293 the joke still stands

    • @spartanx9293
      @spartanx9293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@randomuser5443 not really it doesn't apply well to the f35

    • @wolfifly5944
      @wolfifly5944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      @@spartanx9293 bruh mate do you know what a joke is?

    • @petersouthernboy6327
      @petersouthernboy6327 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      That 3% availability rate for Luftwaffe Eurofighter Typhoons means that they will have very low flight hours well into the future 🤣

  • @richardsmith8654
    @richardsmith8654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great video. It is great to have a nuanced and balanced discussion on defence issues. It is so difficult to have public discussions on all these issues in most Western countries. Not just Germany.

  • @anietula
    @anietula 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great videos and channel!

  • @mattbullman35
    @mattbullman35 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I wish you could do more of these types of videos for other modern military aviation subjects, they are so informative

    • @JoeOvercoat
      @JoeOvercoat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ha! I was wishing this dude was American so he would deconstruct the whack stuff we do.
      Just a thought: start with America’s icebreaker story. It’s a heartbreaker.

    • @suspicionofdeceit
      @suspicionofdeceit 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      JoeOvercoat What story is this?

  • @_ace_defective_
    @_ace_defective_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video. There's so much more nuance and political context that I wasn't aware of before, it's a very interesting topic for sure.

  • @fredmetcalf
    @fredmetcalf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I enjoy and am subscribed to your channel and appreciate the good work you do to make good content and earn your living......thanks, fm

  • @lipmar9014
    @lipmar9014 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Greetings from Germany
    Today its anouncing that Germany buy the Lockheed Martin F 35
    Greetings Philipp

  • @saulekaravirs6585
    @saulekaravirs6585 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    @Military Aviation History I rally enjoy these videos. Could you do more of them for other nations as well?

  • @hoodoo2001
    @hoodoo2001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    As a Texan I appreciate the "y'all".

    • @nonyabuziness5082
      @nonyabuziness5082 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re an embarrassment…

    • @inconnu4961
      @inconnu4961 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That was a nice touch! I had to applaud the 'y'all' and im not a southerner!

  • @karlsloman5320
    @karlsloman5320 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Well Done! There are often those who think these decisions are:"cut and dry" and they never are due to politics. I like the way you broke down the issues. Take care.

    • @ViceCoin
      @ViceCoin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Since they buy Russian gas, ally with Putin. Problem solved.

    • @obliviouz
      @obliviouz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The issue itself seems very cut and dry. The only complexity is politics, which is a cancer on every decision making process.

  • @helmetless
    @helmetless 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Mein neue Favorite video! LOL I really loved the seller-buyer characterization. Thanks for all your videos. Hope you become the Doug DeMuro of aviation, at least you look a bit alike :D Thanks

  • @chs76945
    @chs76945 3 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    Your attempt at a Texas accent was..... disturbing, yet hilarious. I'm not sure if I want you to promise to never do that again, or do it continuously in every video from now on.

    • @DeinonychusA
      @DeinonychusA 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Okay, it's not just me then.
      Hearing Chris say Y'all was unsettling ;D

    • @minimax9452
      @minimax9452 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      So you now can imagine the feelings of a german in hollywood Films? Disgusting.

    • @jimmym3352
      @jimmym3352 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      It's as hilarious as Brad Pitt's Italian accent in Inglourious Basterds.

    • @spartanx9293
      @spartanx9293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The issue is Lockheed Martin is headquartered in Maryland

    • @kelleren4840
      @kelleren4840 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      100% agree lol

  • @SlimRhyno
    @SlimRhyno 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I really appreciate the thoughtfulness that you put into your work. You deliver the information with clarity and reason... And those are two things that our world could use a lot more of (especially here in the U.S.). Anywho, thank you for creating such genuinely thoughtful content, and please keep up the great work. The world needs information sources like you! Also, I'm sorry I haven't been able to contribute any money to your channel, but I hope to do so soon.

  • @chrismr5851
    @chrismr5851 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Well... this Video aged very well.

  • @hansblix8211
    @hansblix8211 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Time to restart the Messerschmitt factory and bring back the ME262, or you can give Merkel a pitchfork 🤣

  • @paulliu5176
    @paulliu5176 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I love your salesman role play!

  • @MisteriosGloriosos922
    @MisteriosGloriosos922 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for share!!!

  • @mnamnam6061
    @mnamnam6061 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Immer wieder bin ich schlicht platt, was du alles auspackst, höchst interessant. Aber der sketch gerade war das Allerbeste, ich lach jetzt noch. Daumen ganz weit hoch.

  • @3isr3g3n
    @3isr3g3n 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Okay die "Golf Handicap"-Angabe hat mich aufm falschen Fuss erwischt, gut gemacht
    EDIT: "Stammtisch-Chairman", ich lach mich tot, richtig nice

  • @slartybartfarst55
    @slartybartfarst55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Thank you. You laid this out very clearly. I'm English, but have lived in Germany for over 20 Years and now have my German Citizenship, so topics like this are very important to me.

    • @MilitaryAviationHistory
      @MilitaryAviationHistory  3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Thank you very much, very happy to hear this

    • @minimax9452
      @minimax9452 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      welcome to germany!

    • @Twiggyay
      @Twiggyay 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also; good name

    • @realQuiGon
      @realQuiGon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Funny enough that topics like this are totally unimportant for the average German :D

    • @minimax9452
      @minimax9452 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@realQuiGon So you are this average guy - thanks.

  • @hertzkot
    @hertzkot 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your insight!

  • @bananomet4052
    @bananomet4052 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I checked out the models and they are not even overpriced as I expected. That is like the first non scammy sponsor I've seen on youtube.

  • @octaviocuesta1155
    @octaviocuesta1155 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Post-Traumatic Starfighter Disorder flashbacks ?

    • @spartanx9293
      @spartanx9293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's what you get for using an interceptor as a fighter bomber they honestly would have been better off buying f-105s

    • @simonm1447
      @simonm1447 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They don't want to jeopardize the FCAS program.
      A modern fighter like the F-35 would make this program almost unnecessary, and would lead to a loss of skills and knowledge in the European fighter industry. So they have to buy something obsolete like the F-18 which is only usable for 20 or 25 years (with restrictions in use, because no stealth) to participate on the FCAS program which is planned to replace Eurofighters and the F-18 in the 2040s.
      The F-18 in Germany is not purchased as an interceptor, but as a bomber, and a bomber for operation in enemy territory is only usable on paper if it has no stealth today, but this is probably wanted by the decision makers. They also castrated the Eurofighters by not equipping it with CFTs to avoid they have to take more responsibilities.

    • @spartanx9293
      @spartanx9293 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@simonm1447 so they want to have a completely outclassed Air Force for the next 20 years just because they don't want to swallow their pride they can still work on fcas anyways and have the f-35 supplement whatever they design

    • @simonm1447
      @simonm1447 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@spartanx9293 Yes. They also castrated the German tranche 3 Eurofighters by removing the capability of carrying CFTs, which would have been standard.
      They don't want a very capable air force, because they don't want to take too much responsibilities outside the homeland defense.

    • @spartanx9293
      @spartanx9293 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@simonm1447 why would they remove cfts unless it's affecting the aerodynamics of the aircraft which they by definition shouldn't. I don't see the issue I feel like it's just going to hurt the design in the long run

  • @duncanidaho2097
    @duncanidaho2097 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thanks for the analysis of the German situation.. very informative.

  • @varschnitzschnur8795
    @varschnitzschnur8795 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @DGAF You're on the right track. Also, I keep remembering that some countries thought they could kind of hold off oin defense spending and preparedness. They sort of figured the other country would carry the ball for them--then they found out the other guy wasn't as prepared as they counted on.

  • @paulboger7377
    @paulboger7377 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Luckily the RAAF had smart decision makers when it came to Hornet/F-111 replacement. They were originally going all F-35, but delays to the programme forced the buy of 24 F/A-18F's. 12 of those were wired for but not with ECM capabilities. Then there was the sudden aquistion of 12 E/A-18G's, with 11 still in service. With Australian industry in the US supply chain for both these aircraft, the RAAF is in a fairly good position.

  • @glynnwadeson5605
    @glynnwadeson5605 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Excellent and well reasoned talk..Its good to have this degree of depth in a TH-cam channel.

  • @mensen4488
    @mensen4488 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    you, together with Millennium 7* are so delightfully thorough, objective and insightful. Thank you for this!

    • @KitKabinet
      @KitKabinet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks for mentioning Millennium 7*. I didn't know his channel and I'm checking it now. Another treasure trove of great content!

    • @MattCellaneous
      @MattCellaneous 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KitKabinet yes it is a treasure trove of great content. And another treasure trove of great accents!

  • @nimaiiikun
    @nimaiiikun 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what aircraft does France use for electronic warfare, like the tornado ECR or Growler?

  • @jackjones8333
    @jackjones8333 ปีที่แล้ว

    Du bist mein absoluter Lieblingskanal bezüglich Aviation. Ich danke dir für deinen Content, mach weiter so! Wir sehen uns vielleicht mal in IL-2 Sturmovik, würde mich sehr freuen! MfG!

  • @primeservice215
    @primeservice215 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Love your work sir, love this episode as an introduction. You have your self a subscriber :)

  • @Perplexer1
    @Perplexer1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    0:06 , 0:27 , 12:51 -- Tornado looks so beefy and awesome with the Luftwaffe insignia!

    • @HeliRy
      @HeliRy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Everything looks better in Luftwaffe

    • @AbhiGuntaka
      @AbhiGuntaka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@HeliRy Good thing it was nice it was the last thing those poles saw

    • @misterbig9025
      @misterbig9025 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tornado performed badly during the Gulf War

    • @XCougar85X
      @XCougar85X 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@misterbig9025 How so? From what i understood it did quite well attacking airfields?

  • @mr.duckplucker5353
    @mr.duckplucker5353 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Germany has plans to unveil an😁 updated version of the ME262.

  • @frankthespank
    @frankthespank 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dude, where’d you get those fighter jet models/figures? I’ve been wanting some but can never find anything like them.

  • @anpan6282
    @anpan6282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Great job explaining the situation especially from the Germany perspective. Would love to see a “what if” scenario of going with an All-Eurofighter solution. What it would take, how long.

    • @renngretsch
      @renngretsch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      13:50 14:24 Lumping Trump in with the warmongering other presidents (and vice president) of this century seems unfair.

    • @lukStSerb
      @lukStSerb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@renngretsch ..13:22 it wasn't Trump the muppet _"president"_ of the US warmongering regime back in 2001-2009 and 2009-2017, now was he?
      *Polls: US Is The Greatest Threat To The World Peace*

    • @yia01
      @yia01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      it take the US and it ally decades to make teh F35 platform what it is. if Germany want to turn teh Eurofighter into it own version of f35, should take just as long too. then since they are at the drawing board, might aswell upgrade it frame to make it more stealthy, upgrade it computer and so forth, by the time they finish, it will be decades later and teh tech will be outdate. IMO will be cheaper to just buy the f35 and use its flatform and stealth as a jump start for Germany to make a domestic 6th gen flatform. at their point, trying to figure out 5th gen tech from scratch will just put german behind and trying to catchup.

    • @tomx641
      @tomx641 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yia01 A| stealth 6th gen Typhoon is basically just BAE Tempest. BAE should be able to produce such a jet with few problems even today, the only technical challenge I see is the variable cycle engine.

    • @ottifant64
      @ottifant64 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@renngretsch He just spent his entire presidency trying to bait the Iranian government into declaring war.

  • @johnedwards3198
    @johnedwards3198 3 ปีที่แล้ว +233

    When I tell my wife I want to spice things up in the bedroom... Then show her the airmodels link... I'm now divorced 😒🥺😏

    • @skybot9998
      @skybot9998 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Rofl!

    • @MilitaryAviationHistory
      @MilitaryAviationHistory  3 ปีที่แล้ว +168

      Get the B-2, she won't see it

    • @bigblue6917
      @bigblue6917 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes. I see where you went wrong there. You should have gone with what she was expecting. And once she is full sated then mention the Airmodels. Hopefully, if you'd done your part and fully indulged her desires, she would have had less cause, and strength, to object.

    • @R281
      @R281 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      More money for toys now

    • @kelleren4840
      @kelleren4840 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You could buy a bi-plane for your coming out party, if that's relevant... 😜

  • @doc7440
    @doc7440 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Surprise !

  • @lawrencekingery7874
    @lawrencekingery7874 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done video! A couple things to think about:
    1. Everything is mission dependent.
    2. Stealth only works until the enemy knows you are there.
    3. Stealth aircraft sacrifice weapons load for stealth, since most weapons need to be internal.
    4. A mixed fleet of a squadron of stealth and a couple squadrons of missile trucks will do better than purely one or the other.
    I'm curious why other in production aircraft, like the F15, are not being considered?

  • @Neilarmeweak550
    @Neilarmeweak550 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    I freaking love the 'salesman' scene

  • @b.k6307
    @b.k6307 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Love how you break all this military business down big fan !!

  • @ASSASSYN
    @ASSASSYN 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was shocked to see Germany still flying the tornado. There was a few on the flightline at Luke AFB AZ when I was active duty.

    • @juliusfucik4011
      @juliusfucik4011 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They did away with the Phantom in 2013. They have a different view on these things. Maybe they maintain the planes really well? I don't know but I remember hearing German Phantoms until about 2005 very well.

  • @yumpinyiminy963
    @yumpinyiminy963 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That was a good sales pitch. 😁👍

  • @ericfrazier7766
    @ericfrazier7766 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Very informative analysis. Whatever decision that the German government and people make regarding military procurement and engagement with its allies, I hope it will take into consideration a long-term view of military affairs, history, and will serve to deter future wars.

    • @Farweasel
      @Farweasel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Si vis pacem, para bellum - It ain't just Roman, its bloody prudent
      (If you want Peace prepare for War)
      Or as Roosevelt put it 'Speak softly and carry a big stick'.
      There was an excellent song (well maybe not musically but in terms of insight) by the 1960s band Groundhogs 'Thank Christ for the Bomb'.
      Today there is a major problem that not having grown up under the threat of war, to too many it seems the best way not to get attacked is not to look threatening.
      The reality is the opposite is true.

  • @TheJoeSwanon
    @TheJoeSwanon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I would be interested to see what kind of fighter Germany would develop if they had the time to design one from the ground up.

    • @BeKindToBirds
      @BeKindToBirds 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It has been a long time since they had a home grown fighter no?

    • @comsubpac
      @comsubpac 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Like the Eurofighter you mean?

    • @Philistine47
      @Philistine47 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@comsubpac I assume he means a purely domestic design.

    • @roadrunner6224
      @roadrunner6224 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @Albert Fels except France has no stake in the Eurofighter.

    • @comsubpac
      @comsubpac 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Albert Fels They don't though. Germany and France both own 10,9 % of the shares.

  • @oliversmith9200
    @oliversmith9200 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Applause for the whole report. Standing applause for the dramatic theatrical segment! The movies have missed out on recruiting an epic actor.

  • @JeffLeChefski
    @JeffLeChefski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Here in Canada, we still haven't made a decision about the F 35. Part of the debate revolves around the single engine, which may pose an issue in the Arctic. It's a very complex weapons platform and expensive too.

    • @anthonysantiago1999
      @anthonysantiago1999 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Avro Arrow

    • @scottsauritch3216
      @scottsauritch3216 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      that single engine happens to be the most reliabl/Tech-advanced/Powerful engine mounted on any fighter, if THE US NAVY IS OKAY WITH THEM as their Carrier fighter, I'd say the engines Damn reliable!

    • @JeffLeChefski
      @JeffLeChefski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@scottsauritch3216 I'm sure they have very high reliability. It's a debate which the RCAF is currently engaged in and relates to expense. I've flown a lot in helicopters. Their engines are very reliable, but when they fail, you crash. Our military is considering other options which may fit our needs for national defense.

    • @tonymorris4335
      @tonymorris4335 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JeffLeChefski The question comes down to whether you'd rather have 80 gen 4+ that aren't compatable with US allies in a fight or 65 Gen 5 aircraft that can network right in with our system. That's a question only you guys can answer, but the US is banking 100% that fewer fighters with better stealth tech is the better move. 100 F18 super hornets vs 50 F35's is a fight likely to go to the smaller force.

    • @JeffLeChefski
      @JeffLeChefski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tonymorris4335 Yes very true. The Americans are maintaining fleets of both....each has an ideal role.

  • @timdouglas2011
    @timdouglas2011 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    How have I ONLY just found your channel!?

    • @TheOutlander82
      @TheOutlander82 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      cuz u ware busy doing sht

    • @joelmccoy9969
      @joelmccoy9969 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm an American living in Germany and I really like 'za Bismark' youtube videos. English spoken like this is my 'Muttersprache' but his videos offer perspective. This is a glimpse of German Early Millennial Humor. He is a Rhein-Main Frankfurter I think. This is classic self-taught Englischsbeeking but not as awful as my 'Deutschsbrechen'.

  • @VladKepes
    @VladKepes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Finland got its final offers from all manufacturers yesterday (Lockheed-Martin, Boeing, BAE, Dassault, Saab), and I think I've heard that exact same F-35 sales pitch myself. The aim is to procure around 64 fighters for €10 billion.

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When the Communists coming rolling into town billions will seem like pocket change.

    • @shi01
      @shi01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@bighands69 Well the last time the communists tried to invade Finland, well...it didn't go exactly as planed to say the least...

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shi01
      And what if they are flying over head?

  • @disekjoumoer
    @disekjoumoer 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent discussion about the politics involved. Well done.

  • @whitesun264
    @whitesun264 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One of the best videos I've seen on TH-cam. Authorative and accessible. Really good. It would be good if the German government does spur on the development of an alternative to the F35 relying on a single option, which every country is placing reliance on, is placing all your bets on one outcome.

  • @isaacjamestea9652
    @isaacjamestea9652 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Are those corgi models you have on display? They look good!! I’m a hobby master fan myself. Hope you show off your collection in another video!!

  • @CMB21497
    @CMB21497 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    In the U.S., we call "Passing it along", "Kicking the Can Down the Road".

    • @jake3736
      @jake3736 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @MrLewisbate why do you have to be like that? If you don't have anything good to say don't say it.

    • @fiddledotgoth
      @fiddledotgoth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Or passing the buck...

    • @lawrenceralph7481
      @lawrenceralph7481 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We call it cowardice.

  • @wootle
    @wootle 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video, the best aviation channel. If theres one thing I took away from this video its what a faithful solid platform Tornado is. I completely understand the discomfort German has with ordering American jets. From a purely technical standpoint (if you were in charge!) what do you think of F-15eX? Thanks for your excellent content!

  • @SeeLasSee
    @SeeLasSee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It’s a tricky situation, and because Germany is quite detached from defense policy this alters it’s engagement with planning.