I have checked their examples on their site, and yes, for example, instead of one model of shoes the Ai created another pair of shoes with better resolution, and instead of a piece of tree bark it recreated a lamp. It clearly redraws some parts of images changing their geometry.
@@English_Lessons_Pre-Int_Interm Yes, but they both do that. They're both ai-upscaling. To get non-ai upscaling, you'll never truly improve quality because it can never truly add detail that isn't already in the image. It's true that currently the best results also come from letting the ai get a bit carried away and it sometimes make the wrong guess... but that will continue to improve in time... and personally, I think you get the most use-cases out of Magnific's upscaler because it passes the eye-test sooo much better than the other. Just wish it was free. :P
cool tech, tried it out on 100 images for a new video, good results, but $40 is too expensive with other options out there, Will hold off until the other companies start using this tech
what would be awesome is an upscaler that identifies individual objects and lets you do a prompt for each one. like it could select the horse, then you say its a horse, then it would fix the leg problem. leonardo's refine kind of does this but you dont have any control over what it does, it just guesses whats in the photo and tries to fix it. idk how they could use the tech to do this, possibly slice the image into pieces and do a generation for each piece or something.
@@weirdwonderfulaiart for real, kind of like an automated inpainting tool where it gives you a series of popups. you could highlight problem areas etc. stable diffusion gets really confused about large complicated scenes, especially ones with disparate themes/colors, and small details, but breaking it up into larger tiles automatically could fix it
@@spacekitt.nTotally, and wouldn't it be great if it automatically broke the image up into layers so you could regenerate just a single layer and it could overlap other elements without removing them, etc. That would be a great way to increase user control as well.
Tried magnific on my own 3D Renders. 40£ is a lot for what you get. With interiors I'm adding small details here and there sometimes but I loose all the selection masks which can be quite crucial ( our briefs are very specific even down to cushion piping and accessories so I can't let AI go too crazy ). Tried enhancing some exteriors and feels like magnific is working better with exteriors. But atm looks like I will be cancelling subscription on AI Enhancers..
Thank you! Is there any comparison available? Gigapixel is a one time payment snd Magnific is very expensive. Trying to figure out if it is worth all that extra money. @@weirdwonderfulaiart
i still believe that magnific, although very good is outrageously overpriced. More upscalers will follow causing magnific to reduce its price...... so ill just keep waiting..
Midjourney v6 alpha is good but not as good as Magnific. Agree 100% - early access to niche but quality upscaler is highly priced but hopefully competition will right size the price.
says I've run out of credits or whatever on all accounts I've tried when I've never even heard of this program. Rly hate this money grubbing BS for new trends like AI.
What an absolute bad way of comparing images... Like but the two images you want to compare on top of each other - then hide/reveal the top image. That's the way to do it - bad workflow right there.
Not advertisement I paid out of my pocket for the subscription to use it. I created the videos to showcase the difference and power of the app. Nothing more.
thanks for another video. i really really hope 'upscale with prompt' is integrated into other products like this.
You can do this with img2img in Automatic1111
not really a fair comparison, magnific clearly is changing the images themselves rather than just improving the quality
agree to disagree. Thanks for watching
I have checked their examples on their site, and yes, for example, instead of one model of shoes the Ai created another pair of shoes with better resolution, and instead of a piece of tree bark it recreated a lamp. It clearly redraws some parts of images changing their geometry.
@@weirdwonderfulaiart What are you disagreeing with? you cannot see how it has changed a lot of things in your images?
@@English_Lessons_Pre-Int_Interm Yes, but they both do that. They're both ai-upscaling. To get non-ai upscaling, you'll never truly improve quality because it can never truly add detail that isn't already in the image. It's true that currently the best results also come from letting the ai get a bit carried away and it sometimes make the wrong guess... but that will continue to improve in time... and personally, I think you get the most use-cases out of Magnific's upscaler because it passes the eye-test sooo much better than the other. Just wish it was free. :P
cool tech, tried it out on 100 images for a new video, good results, but $40 is too expensive with other options out there, Will hold off until the other companies start using this tech
What other options are out there that are less or free?
@@weirdwonderfulaiart Ultimate Upscaler with controlnet
@@weirdwonderfulaiart krea ai
Great work!
Thanks!
what would be awesome is an upscaler that identifies individual objects and lets you do a prompt for each one. like it could select the horse, then you say its a horse, then it would fix the leg problem. leonardo's refine kind of does this but you dont have any control over what it does, it just guesses whats in the photo and tries to fix it. idk how they could use the tech to do this, possibly slice the image into pieces and do a generation for each piece or something.
That sounds like an awesome idea. Hopefully in the future there is some in painting capabilities
@@weirdwonderfulaiart for real, kind of like an automated inpainting tool where it gives you a series of popups. you could highlight problem areas etc. stable diffusion gets really confused about large complicated scenes, especially ones with disparate themes/colors, and small details, but breaking it up into larger tiles automatically could fix it
@@spacekitt.nTotally, and wouldn't it be great if it automatically broke the image up into layers so you could regenerate just a single layer and it could overlap other elements without removing them, etc. That would be a great way to increase user control as well.
Tried magnific on my own 3D Renders. 40£ is a lot for what you get. With interiors I'm adding small details here and there sometimes but I loose all the selection masks which can be quite crucial ( our briefs are very specific even down to cushion piping and accessories so I can't let AI go too crazy ). Tried enhancing some exteriors and feels like magnific is working better with exteriors. But atm looks like I will be cancelling subscription on AI Enhancers..
Interesting insight you share. What about blending a few different upscales, did you try that?
Magnific Ai vs Topaz Gigapixel?
Magnific wins!
Thank you! Is there any comparison available? Gigapixel is a one time payment snd Magnific is very expensive. Trying to figure out if it is worth all that extra money. @@weirdwonderfulaiart
can you please provide the result pics ? via drive or something
Images available on the blog - weirdwonderfulai.art/resources/upscaler-comparison-midjourney-vs-magnific-ai/
It's a fine tool but it is RIDICULOUSLY expensive. $39 per month for an upscaler?! No thank you
Well have a look at this then Magnific AI alternative th-cam.com/video/iLODwfjd-Ys/w-d-xo.html
US$39 per month. Expensive. In addition, the Midjourney V6 takes super realistic photos.
Indeed but still MJ v6 details are not as good. So depends what you want as results.
i still believe that magnific, although very good is outrageously overpriced. More upscalers will follow causing magnific to reduce its price...... so ill just keep waiting..
Midjourney v6 alpha is good but not as good as Magnific. Agree 100% - early access to niche but quality upscaler is highly priced but hopefully competition will right size the price.
It looks good, but at $40/month, I'll pass. I'm sure other products will keep upping their game to make generative AI more realistic.
Competition is always good. Hopefully Midjourney v6 can replicate this kind of details.
@@weirdwonderfulaiart I hadn't considered that. Do you think it's possible?
@@lun321 v6 alpha was just released yesterday. Details are good in many cases but still not at par imo with Magnific
Its weird how what was once considered mindblowing only a year or two ago is no longer good enough and now needs upscaling, will we ever be satisfied?
@@maccagrabme Better is always better.
sometimes more is less
indeed
you should update to 4K... instead of showing the cheap HD resolution in you videos.. thank you
Hopefully soon.
Hi, I'm Tess from Digiarty Software. Interested in a collab?
Always
@@weirdwonderfulaiart DMed you on your ins, please check
says I've run out of credits or whatever on all accounts I've tried when I've never even heard of this program.
Rly hate this money grubbing BS for new trends like AI.
You can now try this if you have your own setup, ComfyUI Ultimate Upscaler Workflow - Magnific.ai Alternative
th-cam.com/video/iLODwfjd-Ys/w-d-xo.html
it's not free
Good things are never free
old photos
Ok
What an absolute bad way of comparing images... Like but the two images you want to compare on top of each other - then hide/reveal the top image. That's the way to do it - bad workflow right there.
Thanks for the feedback
This video is an advertisement for a paid, and expensive, service!
Not advertisement I paid out of my pocket for the subscription to use it. I created the videos to showcase the difference and power of the app. Nothing more.
@@weirdwonderfulaiart Still, your video leads people to hire a very expensive platform that does the same thing that other software does for free.
@PoliticamenteIncorreto1 would love to see how you get that kind of quality and details for FREE. Pls share!
@@weirdwonderfulaiart Automatic1111 do it
@@PoliticamenteIncorreto1 you cant accuse someone of something so harsh, then backtrack, then blame them for something else, its terrible logic