I just started watching your posts, thank you for using big names in literatures, philosophy eastern western ones! 👌👏🙏🙌🏻Your first few sentences reminds me of social media : Face Book or Instagram etc... I know people there literally dying to tell the whole world how lucky happy wealthy & the list goes on ,,, I have nothing to show off according to their standards! Even if I had, I absolutely don’t have any urge to post most personal things to announce it publickly,,, I still don’t get why this makes masses happy😏
When we see this in others we see a weakness. I assume I lie to myself. I may miss some things but I feel that I am improving. Our present Knowledge is finite. It has to be. This means there has to be a boundary between what is known and what is not. If we look at what lies beyond we realise it has to be infinite. How do we assess the scale of our understanding given infinite possibilities outside? We are always on the cusp, on an expanding boundary of understanding but there is no end. If we reached the end we cannot say there may be more. The end is a lie. I think this is the true nature of Dialectics.
Great Channel. Thanks a lot for the excellent work
@@fightclub571 Appreciate it, Keep Supporting!
I just started watching your posts, thank you for using big names in literatures, philosophy eastern western ones! 👌👏🙏🙌🏻Your first few sentences reminds me of social media : Face Book or Instagram etc... I know people there literally dying to tell the whole world how lucky happy wealthy & the list goes on ,,, I have nothing to show off according to their standards! Even if I had, I absolutely don’t have any urge to post most personal things to announce it publickly,,, I still don’t get why this makes masses happy😏
Glad You liked it!
When we see this in others we see a weakness. I assume I lie to myself. I may miss some things but I feel that I am improving. Our present Knowledge is finite. It has to be. This means there has to be a boundary between what is known and what is not. If we look at what lies beyond we realise it has to be infinite. How do we assess the scale of our understanding given infinite possibilities outside? We are always on the cusp, on an expanding boundary of understanding but there is no end. If we reached the end we cannot say there may be more. The end is a lie. I think this is the true nature of Dialectics.
Thank you ❤️
You’re welcome