A good review, you've cut through so much of the nonsense and triviality that too many people focus on during lens reviews. I've got the G2 on a Nikon body and my experience so far is exactly what you've described.
Hi, thanks for watching. It is very easy to get caught up in the hype for some lenses and just as easily to let a few negative comments steer you away from an essentially good one. I have found there are very few that I would steer clear of, most just need the user to spend the time using it to get the best from it. All the best!👍
Hi Samiul, yes it would. I have also used the sigma 150-600 contemporary which I think is cheaper and also the Tamron 150-600 Mk1. The build quality on both these lenses is less good than the G2 but they are still capable lenses. Will all these things there are going to be compromises. I now shoot with the Sony 200-600 as I now shoot only Sony but although it matches the G2 and image quality is stunning I miss the zoom locks on the G2. I would also say that I buy most of my lenses used form companies such as MPB which can also reduce cost.👍
It may not have been a Review Scott but I thought you did an awesome job of explaining what you ACTUALLY need to know from a Wildlife Photographers perspective! I've got the Canon 100-400, Plus two primes 300 & 600, but they are heavy bits of kit! But I'm seriously considering the Tamron 150-600 G2, looked at Sigma but weight issues, and the whole point is a lightweight stalking outfit! the IS looks pretty good, sharp, nice focus and quiet.... ish.. You are right about the sweet spot, many lens differ for the same model! Crazy! But shooting with the Tamron at F7.1 looks pretty dam sharp! I'm liking it and at a price that doesn't totally break the bank! Love the Little Owl image on the Roof, and the Deer shots are awesome... Well done my friend, keep them coming it will certainly help those who are starting out in Wildlife Photography, and nice to see from all us Amateurs, lol. Regards R :-)
Thanks Richard, one thing I did forget to mention is that the autofocus on the sigma 100-400 was very noisy. Not a problem for most people but it was terrible when I was trying to film with it. The Tamron on the other hand is very quiet. I also went for the Tamron over the Sigma sport because at 400mm the Tamron is F5.6 while the Sigma is F6.3. Sometimes in the early morning while stalking wildlife that extra stop can be useful. Really struck lucky with the deer shots how often does that sublime light briefly break through as well as having a willing subject!! Thanks for watching mate.👍
There is nothing like mounting a good long lens and getting out for some wildlife photography. Nice review Scott and some really nice photos. Thanks for sharing.
Cheers Steven, I can see why most people sit in a studio and do reviews!! I got slightly distracted by the Roe Deer but the first image is possibly my favourite this year as far as wildlife goes. Thanks for watching👍
Spot on Scott. I think I’ll be getting that lens eventually for my D850 with the F mount. Weight is an issue for me so this would definitely work better for me. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and great pics 👍🙏
Cheers Adrian, I think zooms have come on a huge amount over the last few years and if you spend enough time finding that sweet spot they are very capable of matching the big primes. I used to think that with a more reasonably priced zoom you had to work a little bit harder to get the same result as a big prime but I am beginning to think work harder should be replaced with differently. I don't think you would be disappointed! 👍
Not a lens I've used but I did have it's equivalent Tamron 150-600 (original) and I took some of my favorite images with it. I'm sure you won't be disappointed with it👍
Hi Scott, great review video, I recently came back to dslr photography with a 2000d and kit lenses, 18-55 and 70-300, but was looking at this lens for the extra focal length, would this lens be ok for my setup.
Hello Kevin, I can't see why not. I have used the Sigma 100-400, Tamron 150-600 (original version) and the Tamron 150-600 G2. All have taken some excellent images. The G2 only won out from the sigma because it gave extra reach and the original Tamron as the build quality was much better. I also think that the quality control on the original Tamron was a bit patchy. I think I got lucky with a very good copy. Thanks for watching.👍
Very nice review, have this lens and it works well, in good light, brilliant, usually shoot f 7.1 - f 8. Many thanks for sharing. Great photos Scott, love the rabbit. Greetings from Norfolk. UK
Hi Scott, great video! Considering the much lower price point of the sigma 150-600mm C, was the choice to go for the Tamron based on weight for you? Apologies if this is something you have mentioned in the past.
Hi Daniel, for me I had the funds to go for the Tamron 150-600 G2 or the Sigma 150-600 sport and although, as I say in the video build quality has never been an issue for me it always give you that little bit of extra confidence to shoot a little bit longer in that downpour etc. If my funds didn't allow it then I would have certainly been happy to get the contemporary👍
Hi Scott nice to see an honest forthright reviewish your bang on with the comments regarding the other lenses, what you have to remember is that we amateurs don't earn a living from photography we do it for the love of it, we haven't got thousands to spend on the best lenses or cameras, your spot on when you say get what's best for you, but at the same time its nice to here from a seasoned ( hope that's the right word ) or professional if you want that a particular lens takes a good image and if you can take one with it then there's no reason why we can't. Regards the weight I was in the category were my Nikon 200-500mm was to heavy sold it and bought a 300mm prime light as a feather, but I do miss that extra reach and looks like I will have to grin and bear the weight issue to get that image that's just to far for the 300mm. Thanks again for the reviewish stay safe mate. 👍
Thanks Graeme, it really is a rule of diminishing returns above a certain price point and there are so many other areas within wildlife photography where you can improve your percentages at no cost other than putting the work and research in. I had some stunning results with my Canon 50d and 300mm f4 with and without the 1.4 converter. So much so it was on my list again this time. Just work on those other areas and get out as much as you can and you should have some great successes with that set up👍
Lovely review I use canon 6D mark II and I’ve been looking for a while now to get a good telephoto lens, completely confused between the Canon 100-400 markII and the Tamron 150-600 G2 It’s still hard to decide between the extra reach, good reviews of the Tamron and the excellent reputation of sharpness and fast focus of the canon lens... which is more expensive too... What camera are you using with the Tamron in this video please? And do you think that I should get it for the affordability and extra reach for my 6d markii without regretting not waiting longer to get the less reach and guaranteed performance canon lens? Thanks
Hello Hamada, I'm using a Canon 80D in this video. I think the Tamron is a great choice as with the 6Dii being a full frame camera you will have a 600mm lens. I have also had the Canon 100-400 Mk2. It is also a fantastic lens but the main issue for me was it's actually about 370mm not the full 400mm. There are a number of reviews which show this when its up against something like the Canon 400mm F5.6 prime its not actually a true 400mm. Having said that one thing that would sway me towards the Canon is if you see yourself doing some close up macro photography. I think the Canon close focus is under a metre and allows you to be almost on par with a true macro lens. Hope that helps! Scott👍
I had no worries with Sharpness with the Tamron. I was just advising that if you also wanted something to work at closer range and do some macro photography the Canon gives you that option.
Hi Scott fantastic video really enjoyed it , hope you don’t mind me asking I know you got the sigma 100-400 I’m thinking of getting the tamron 100-400 just wondering what made you get the sigma to the tamron, I’m getting different reviews on them I want the lens mainly for wildlife photography.
Hi Martyn, I think it was just availability at the time to be honest and I think the Tamron was newer and slkightly more expensive. My comments still stand that either would be a great lens however, for me if I was making the choice now I may go for the Tamron and that is only because I think it captures slightly more light than the Sigma.👍
Hi Michael, I suspect that every lens will be slightly different. I would only worry about it if the lens is so far out that you cannot adjust it. If you have managed to adjust to get sharp images then I would be happy with that. Mine needed a slight adjustment by the way👍
I don't own it but I think that this lens it's a great starting point to understand if you like to do wildlife photography and if you want to invest in something more, or anyway to use it to enjoy wildlife photography from time to time without the need in investing much more.
Thanks Fabrizio, I think this lens is good enough to produce images as good as any expensive prime lens at triple the cost so really happy with it. Thanks for watching!👍
Enjoyed your video with this lens and great display of your images. I have this lens and I have yet to produce sharp in focus photos, which is attached to canon 5div. I do shoot in manual with iso -auto. However, would you have any pointers on focus settings? Thanks in advance.
Hello Christine, what autofocus settings are you using now? One thing I have seen during my workshops is clients having multiple autofocus points active. I don't use this because when taking images of wildlife it is often moving and autofocus can refocus in on background or foreground objects as well as parts of the animal that may not be required to be in sharp focus. I always aim for the eye of the animal bird to be in focus and use single point (the central one) and continuous autofocus. Hope this helps, if not please feel free to ask some more. Scott👍
Hello, thanks for your reply. I’m a back button focus person and I have tried 9 point and one point center focus. Always continuous shooting. Very new to this hefty lens as I’m a portrait and wedding photographer. There is a bird sanctuary in my back yard and so many birds and such. So I bought this lens to get even closer than tamron 70-200 with 2 x extender. Maybe I just need more hands on
Hi Christine, you seem to be doing all the right things. In this case I would first make sure there is nothing wrong with the lens. Sometimes they can back or front focus so even if you hit focus on the eye of a subject the lens can be set up to focus slightly forward or slightly behind that point. If you look up back focusing lenses on youtube you will see some videos on how to check and adjust for it. I would initially set my camera/ lens up on a sturdy tripod and then hit focus on an object and a good few yards away. Use the 2 second timer and take a shot. If the point you aimed at is in sharp focus then you know it may be a technique issue which you will get the more you use it. Hope this helps. Scott👍
Thanks William, this really is a great lens for the price. I'm currently using it on my Sony A6400 and getting some great results. Thanks for watching👍
Cheers Paul, the light was just perfect for a few minutes with the deer shots, I'm glad I took the opportunity! How often do you get that sublime light and a subject at the same time😂👍
Hi Eric, did you watch the video? I counted at least six images taken with this lens throughout the course of the video? 🤔 If you want more I would suggest you subscribe to the channel as all my wildlife images are taken with this lens and either a Sony A6400 or Canon 80d. Sorry it wasn't more helpful to you.👍
A good review, you've cut through so much of the nonsense and triviality that too many people focus on during lens reviews. I've got the G2 on a Nikon body and my experience so far is exactly what you've described.
Hi, thanks for watching. It is very easy to get caught up in the hype for some lenses and just as easily to let a few negative comments steer you away from an essentially good one. I have found there are very few that I would steer clear of, most just need the user to spend the time using it to get the best from it. All the best!👍
i'm planning to get this for my 80D. Is it a wise decision in 2022? i don't see any other options to choose from. Have limited budget.
Its a great choice but if you are on a budget and don't need as much reach the Sigma 100-400 is also a great lens.👍
@@scotttilleyphotography I do bird photography mostly. May be the extra reach can help?
Hi Samiul, yes it would. I have also used the sigma 150-600 contemporary which I think is cheaper and also the Tamron 150-600 Mk1. The build quality on both these lenses is less good than the G2 but they are still capable lenses. Will all these things there are going to be compromises. I now shoot with the Sony 200-600 as I now shoot only Sony but although it matches the G2 and image quality is stunning I miss the zoom locks on the G2. I would also say that I buy most of my lenses used form companies such as MPB which can also reduce cost.👍
@@scotttilleyphotography Thanks a lot Scott. The information will help.
It may not have been a Review Scott but I thought you did an awesome job of explaining what you ACTUALLY need to know from a Wildlife Photographers perspective! I've got the Canon 100-400, Plus two primes 300 & 600, but they are heavy bits of kit! But I'm seriously considering the Tamron 150-600 G2, looked at Sigma but weight issues, and the whole point is a lightweight stalking outfit! the IS looks pretty good, sharp, nice focus and quiet.... ish.. You are right about the sweet spot, many lens differ for the same model! Crazy! But shooting with the Tamron at F7.1 looks pretty dam sharp! I'm liking it and at a price that doesn't totally break the bank! Love the Little Owl image on the Roof, and the Deer shots are awesome... Well done my friend, keep them coming it will certainly help those who are starting out in Wildlife Photography, and nice to see from all us Amateurs, lol. Regards R :-)
Thanks Richard, one thing I did forget to mention is that the autofocus on the sigma 100-400 was very noisy. Not a problem for most people but it was terrible when I was trying to film with it. The Tamron on the other hand is very quiet. I also went for the Tamron over the Sigma sport because at 400mm the Tamron is F5.6 while the Sigma is F6.3. Sometimes in the early morning while stalking wildlife that extra stop can be useful. Really struck lucky with the deer shots how often does that sublime light briefly break through as well as having a willing subject!! Thanks for watching mate.👍
There is nothing like mounting a good long lens and getting out for some wildlife photography. Nice review Scott and some really nice photos. Thanks for sharing.
Cheers Steven, I can see why most people sit in a studio and do reviews!! I got slightly distracted by the Roe Deer but the first image is possibly my favourite this year as far as wildlife goes. Thanks for watching👍
Spot on Scott. I think I’ll be getting that lens eventually for my D850 with the F mount. Weight is an issue for me so this would definitely work better for me. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and great pics 👍🙏
Cheers Adrian, I think zooms have come on a huge amount over the last few years and if you spend enough time finding that sweet spot they are very capable of matching the big primes. I used to think that with a more reasonably priced zoom you had to work a little bit harder to get the same result as a big prime but I am beginning to think work harder should be replaced with differently. I don't think you would be disappointed! 👍
you know what, yeah you've got a point, its not all about the gear, so I guess I've made up my mind of the sigma 150-600 contemporary.
Not a lens I've used but I did have it's equivalent Tamron 150-600 (original) and I took some of my favorite images with it. I'm sure you won't be disappointed with it👍
Hi Scott, great review video, I recently came back to dslr photography with a 2000d and kit lenses, 18-55 and 70-300, but was looking at this lens for the extra focal length, would this lens be ok for my setup.
Hello Kevin, I can't see why not. I have used the Sigma 100-400, Tamron 150-600 (original version) and the Tamron 150-600 G2. All have taken some excellent images. The G2 only won out from the sigma because it gave extra reach and the original Tamron as the build quality was much better. I also think that the quality control on the original Tamron was a bit patchy. I think I got lucky with a very good copy. Thanks for watching.👍
Just bought this lens for the Canon 90D. Love it. It can be a bit hit and miss on further subjects in regards to focus. But an amazing lens otherwise
Its an outstanding lens for the price and the build quality is a couple of steps up from the original version that I used to own. Thanks for watching👍
Very nice review, have this lens and it works well, in good light, brilliant, usually shoot f 7.1 - f 8. Many thanks for sharing. Great photos Scott, love the rabbit. Greetings from Norfolk. UK
Cheers Paul, I don't have any complaints with it to be honest and your spot on I prefer to shoot at F7.1 if I can. Thanks for watching👍
Since this lens is waiting at home to be used, for now I must satisfy myself watching YOU use it. Great video! Thanks!
Thanks Kevin, I'm glad you enjoyed it the Tamron is a fantastic lens. You won't be disappointed👍
Hi Scott, great video! Considering the much lower price point of the sigma 150-600mm C, was the choice to go for the Tamron based on weight for you? Apologies if this is something you have mentioned in the past.
Hi Daniel, for me I had the funds to go for the Tamron 150-600 G2 or the Sigma 150-600 sport and although, as I say in the video build quality has never been an issue for me it always give you that little bit of extra confidence to shoot a little bit longer in that downpour etc. If my funds didn't allow it then I would have certainly been happy to get the contemporary👍
Excellent captures! Love the deer & rabbit
Thanks, glad you enjoyed it. The first fawn image is one of my favourites this year! Thanks for watching👍
Hi Scott nice to see an honest forthright reviewish your bang on with the comments regarding the other lenses, what you have to remember is that we amateurs don't earn a living from photography we do it for the love of it, we haven't got thousands to spend on the best lenses or cameras, your spot on when you say get what's best for you, but at the same time its nice to here from a seasoned ( hope that's the right word ) or professional if you want that a particular lens takes a good image and if you can take one with it then there's no reason why we can't. Regards the weight I was in the category were my Nikon 200-500mm was to heavy sold it and bought a 300mm prime light as a feather, but I do miss that extra reach and looks like I will have to grin and bear the weight issue to get that image that's just to far for the 300mm. Thanks again for the reviewish stay safe mate. 👍
Thanks Graeme, it really is a rule of diminishing returns above a certain price point and there are so many other areas within wildlife photography where you can improve your percentages at no cost other than putting the work and research in. I had some stunning results with my Canon 50d and 300mm f4 with and without the 1.4 converter. So much so it was on my list again this time. Just work on those other areas and get out as much as you can and you should have some great successes with that set up👍
Lovely review
I use canon 6D mark II and I’ve been looking for a while now to get a good telephoto lens, completely confused between the Canon 100-400 markII and the Tamron 150-600 G2
It’s still hard to decide between the extra reach, good reviews of the Tamron and the excellent reputation of sharpness and fast focus of the canon lens... which is more expensive too...
What camera are you using with the Tamron in this video please?
And do you think that I should get it for the affordability and extra reach for my 6d markii without regretting not waiting longer to get the less reach and guaranteed performance canon lens?
Thanks
Hello Hamada, I'm using a Canon 80D in this video. I think the Tamron is a great choice as with the 6Dii being a full frame camera you will have a 600mm lens. I have also had the Canon 100-400 Mk2. It is also a fantastic lens but the main issue for me was it's actually about 370mm not the full 400mm. There are a number of reviews which show this when its up against something like the Canon 400mm F5.6 prime its not actually a true 400mm. Having said that one thing that would sway me towards the Canon is if you see yourself doing some close up macro photography. I think the Canon close focus is under a metre and allows you to be almost on par with a true macro lens. Hope that helps! Scott👍
So you recommend the Tamron G2 ? I’m leaning more to it for the price and range, at the same time I don’t anna feel disappointed with the sharpness.
I had no worries with Sharpness with the Tamron. I was just advising that if you also wanted something to work at closer range and do some macro photography the Canon gives you that option.
Hi Scott fantastic video really enjoyed it , hope you don’t mind me asking I know you got the sigma 100-400 I’m thinking of getting the tamron 100-400 just wondering what made you get the sigma to the tamron, I’m getting different reviews on them I want the lens mainly for wildlife photography.
Hi Martyn, I think it was just availability at the time to be honest and I think the Tamron was newer and slkightly more expensive. My comments still stand that either would be a great lens however, for me if I was making the choice now I may go for the Tamron and that is only because I think it captures slightly more light than the Sigma.👍
Hi Scott I’ve just got a new 100-400 Tamron lens fantastic lens
I'm using this lens for birding on Canon 7d2 and 5Dsr and it's cracking sharp but I've had to set micro adjust on both cameras to +12. Is this usual?
Hi Michael, I suspect that every lens will be slightly different. I would only worry about it if the lens is so far out that you cannot adjust it. If you have managed to adjust to get sharp images then I would be happy with that. Mine needed a slight adjustment by the way👍
@@scotttilleyphotography Thanks
I don't own it but I think that this lens it's a great starting point to understand if you like to do wildlife photography and if you want to invest in something more, or anyway to use it to enjoy wildlife photography from time to time without the need in investing much more.
Thanks Fabrizio, I think this lens is good enough to produce images as good as any expensive prime lens at triple the cost so really happy with it. Thanks for watching!👍
@@scotttilleyphotography Very useful info ;-)
Best review iv watched. And watched loads of them about this lens thank you
Thanks for your kind words Paul. This really is a great lens for the price. I certainly haven't been disappointed. Thanks for watching👍
Enjoyed your video with this lens and great display of your images. I have this lens and I have yet to produce sharp in focus photos, which is attached to canon 5div. I do shoot in manual with iso -auto. However, would you have any pointers on focus settings? Thanks in advance.
Hello Christine, what autofocus settings are you using now? One thing I have seen during my workshops is clients having multiple autofocus points active. I don't use this because when taking images of wildlife it is often moving and autofocus can refocus in on background or foreground objects as well as parts of the animal that may not be required to be in sharp focus. I always aim for the eye of the animal bird to be in focus and use single point (the central one) and continuous autofocus. Hope this helps, if not please feel free to ask some more. Scott👍
Hello, thanks for your reply. I’m a back button focus person and I have tried 9 point and one point center focus. Always continuous shooting. Very new to this hefty lens as I’m a portrait and wedding photographer. There is a bird sanctuary in my back yard and so many birds and such. So I bought this lens to get even closer than tamron 70-200 with 2 x extender. Maybe I just need more hands on
Hi Christine, you seem to be doing all the right things. In this case I would first make sure there is nothing wrong with the lens. Sometimes they can back or front focus so even if you hit focus on the eye of a subject the lens can be set up to focus slightly forward or slightly behind that point. If you look up back focusing lenses on youtube you will see some videos on how to check and adjust for it. I would initially set my camera/ lens up on a sturdy tripod and then hit focus on an object and a good few yards away. Use the 2 second timer and take a shot. If the point you aimed at is in sharp focus then you know it may be a technique issue which you will get the more you use it. Hope this helps. Scott👍
What camera body are you using ?
Hello Robert, its a Canon 80D. Hope that helps and thanks for watching👍
Love your common sense review thank you !
Thanks William, this really is a great lens for the price. I'm currently using it on my Sony A6400 and getting some great results. Thanks for watching👍
Just purchased mine after watching several good reviews and comparing it to the Sigma sport, I am confident that I made the right choice 😀
I'm sure you won't be disappointed!👍
Good fair review
Thanks Samuel!👍
Good video Scott and very nice shots of the deer
Cheers Paul, the light was just perfect for a few minutes with the deer shots, I'm glad I took the opportunity! How often do you get that sublime light and a subject at the same time😂👍
Fair...very fair.
Thanks Jacob👍
brilliant
Cheers! Thanks for watching!!👍
Talk so much, don't show any sample images.
Hi Eric, did you watch the video? I counted at least six images taken with this lens throughout the course of the video? 🤔 If you want more I would suggest you subscribe to the channel as all my wildlife images are taken with this lens and either a Sony A6400 or Canon 80d. Sorry it wasn't more helpful to you.👍