the funny thing is that he didnt accually false start, experts have investigated that drummond reacted faster than possible for a human beeing - they said it was like he "sensed" the shot before it even had been shot
Il n'y a pas que le départ avant les autre qui est considéré comme un "faux-départ", il y a aussi la pression appliquée sur les starting block. Ces pressions sont analysées pour voir quand l'impulsion du sprinter a commencé. L'athlète ne soit mettre aucune pression sur les blocks avant le coup de feu. GOOGLE TRANSLATE -> FRENCH
Dieu Donné tu dit ''il n'y a pas que le départ avant les autres qui fait office de faux départ'' mais c'est faux. En aucun cas on discalifie un sprinteur car il a eu un meilleur temps de réaction que les autres.... le faux départ n'est pas une affaire de comparaison... en sprint il n'y a en réalité qu'une seule façon de faire un faux départ.. BOUGER AVANT LE SIGNAL DU STARTER
i feel bad for drummond this was his real last chance to get a individual medal.. he was nearly 35 at this time.. and he has never won any individual medal in his over 10 year career.. only Relay.. so i feel it for him here.. and seeing how the finals was won in a pedestrian 10.07 who knows what might have happened had drummond made it.. sad sad
ce qu'il faut retenir, c'est que ce n'est pas simplement le fait de partir avant les 100 millième qui vous donne un faut départ, mais simplement le fait de faire bouger un peu les start avec vos jambes tremblantes, rien qu'une minuscule pression de 100gr sur les bloc déclenche le faut départ
Elodie Lefebvre heu....tu dis exactement la même chose. si tu est partie avant les 100 millièmes de secondes,c'est que tu as effectué une pression sur les starting block avant les 100 millièmes de secondes...par contre tu peux très bien effectuer une pression sur les block sans pour autant partir,ce qui vaudra toujours une disqualification si cela c'est fait à 100 millièmes de secondes après le coup de feu du starter...oui car les sprinter ne sont en général pas disqualifiés parce qu'ils sont partis avant le coup de feux,mais plutôt parce qu'il sont partis certe après le coup de feux,mais le temps de réaction qu'ils ont eu est humainement impossible,le temps que l'information arrive au cerveau puis que le cerveau donne l'ordre de aux muscles,il est impossible pour un homme de partir a 100 millièmes de secondes après le coup de feux du starter. ..
Pour partir vite tous les athlètes poussent dans les starts avant et pendant les 100 millième de seconde, Les chercheurs ont de plus calculé que Bolt avait une puissance maximale de 2.619,5 watts après seulement 0,89 seconde de course. C'est le fait de relâcher ou de "tamponner" les blocks qui donne un faux départ. C'est la différence de poussée de quelques kilos dans les blocs à peu près une tonne et le relâchement prématuré ou non qui font la différence au départ.
most false starts do occur after the gun sounds. However because there is a generally accepted minimum reaction time that a human can have to the gun if you move before that point you must have reacted before the gun sounded
I think people don't imagine what's 4 years of work. 1/20 of his lifetime, dedicated for one big thing. Taken away by a false start. Jury needs to be more fair than that..
They get 3 major titles every 4 years; 2 Worlds and 1 Olympics. There had already been a false start and under the new rules at the time any break after that is out. No ifs, buts, or maybes. Asafa Powell was also eliminated here, and he never won a major title in his career apart from relays despite holding the world record for several years and breaking 10 sec more times than any human in history. Spare a thought for him. Drummond never won anything at the world level apart from 2 relays either, and he wouldn't have won this he was years past his prime and his career PB was only 9.92. Regardless of all that his behaviour here is completely unacceptable. He disrespects the sport, the judges, his competitors, his team, his country, and the crowd. Funny though!
@@truefunksoul8638 just stfu, you could clearly see drummon didnt false start. He naturally has a quick reaction. They need to change these stupid and outdated false start measurements, going on the B of the bang isnt a false start 😑😑😑
Kristoffer McCarthy fuck off dickhead. I can "clearly see" that you're a butt-hurt American still failing to accept reality all these years later, or an embarrassed relative of the shamefully arrogant ego-maniac crybaby prima donna Drummond. "He naturally has a quick reaction" !! Thanks for the laughs champ. Did I mention go fuck yourself?
@@truefunksoul8638 I'm English and to me that looked like they all went in almost perfect synchronicity. People get DQ'd all the time and know instantly they messed up. His behaviour wasn't great but it is understandable when he was clearly certain he went after the gun.
Maybe not but he moved within a physically impossible time to hear the gun then react; that's measurable and he got a jump on it, so it's a false start. It's not like there's some judge doing it with the naked eye, the sensor in his blocks detected him moving too fast. He didn't break as clearly as Powell who was beside him but he broke, and that's why they were both disqualified. It was a new rule about disqualifying anyone who broke in a restart which came in that year, then it was changed back in 2009 because slower guys were tactically breaking on purpose in the initial start to put pressure on the faster guys in the restart not to break.
@raoulhery Yeah! I don't know exactly how this system was working but if you look carefully at 2:52, he clearly did not move. Powell clearly started too early but Drummond did not. He actually still had his feet on the blocks while Dwight Thomas on the 3rd lane moved his back feet before him.
he did not move. starting in less than 0.1 seconds after the gun fires is considered false start, however, there have been a few athletes with very developed reflexes that have been able to react under 0.1 seconds. it was such a pity for drummond :(
rubbish. its physiologically impossible to react faster. they even have a fudge factor in it to allow for the benefit of the doubt. the start will reflect a false if its faster than 0.10 and scientists have proven that no one can react faster than 0.12.
Manuel Alejandro Ramírez Ambrosio well, there's been an athlete from finland who was put on test and, his nervous system was monitored and he was able to react in between 0.08 and 0.1 seconds. This made the scientist formulate a theory about muscles "receiving" the wave sounds directly instead of receiving the stimulus only with the hearing system, altohugh this theory couldn't be totally explained. this finnish athlete was able to legally react in very litle less than 0.1 seconds. so we can say it's just almost possible, but very, very rare. and , as you see in the video drummond didn't move before the sound. which, could be a case of super fast reaction, as this finnish athlete
Jonny Woodburn This is the race that caused Asafa so much trauma. The look of bewilderment on his face when he's shown the red cared says it all. This must be replaying in his head just before each race. Someone needs to help him root out the problem rasta. Can't mek him go to waste like this. Can't bear it bredren....jus can't.
Was this one of those situations where he false started because his reaction time was too fast? I saw a video saying that its possible to be DQ'd if you launch off the block right as the gun goes off because its physically impossible for a human to react that fast and thus, its a false start
If your whole life revolves around training for this race, how else can you react when you know you are getting unfairly screwed....he did a good job not punching whoever was responsible for the bogus call
Video doesn't lie: Drummond did NOT false start. 2:51 shows Powell moving FIRST, of all things. What an absurd call. The official should have been removed from the sport.
Just because he believes he "didn't move" before the gun does not mean he didn't false start. The system measures how soon after the gun does the runner apply foot pressure on the blocks. You can apply pressure on the blocks with your feet before any other part of the body moves. If pressure is sensed on any of the blocks less then 0.1 seconds after the gun , a false start is given to each runner who broke that time limit. The reasoning is that no human can react to the gun faster than 0.1 seconds after hearing it. It takes at least 0.1 seconds for the brain to "hear" the gun and then command the muscles to react. So the logic is , if the sensors in the blocks sense pressure in less than 0.1 seconds after the gun, the runner did not react to the gun but instead "jumped" the gun, ie: the runner anticipated when the gun would sound.. Imo, they should not false start a runner as long as the runner put pressure on the blocks after the gun. How close to "after" the gun shouldn't matter as long as it's AFTER the gun. If you want to take luck out of the equation and prevent runners from getting an advantage by "guessing" when the gun will sound, then don't always fire the gun at the same interval after the "get set" command is given. Use arbitrary intervals within fair limits. For those thinking that each runner should be given one false start. Several reasons why they had to scrap that past procedure but the main one was that if each runner got one false start you could end up taking an hour on every race just to get the race started. Knowing you get one false start gives a runner great incentive to "jump" the gun in the hopes of getting away with it . No penalty if it doesn't work out.
How would you react if you spend months studying for an exam, and then on the big day you got kicked out of the examination room all because of a false claim?
Obviously after the terrible injustice of being disqualified for breaking the start I would throw a tantrum like a little 5-year old child and refuse to leave the examination room while lying flat on my back in denial that I just broke the start thereby disrupting the exam for all other students for about 10 or 15 minutes before going to the locker room to cry my eyes out. Then I would learn the rules of my chosen subject so I would understand how not to break them in future exams. I would also try to learn the basic concepts of accepting the judges' decision and how to not be a sore loser crybaby embarrassing little bitch disgrace to my country. Isn't that what everyone would do?
@@truefunksoul8638 No, as the decision actually could be based on incorrect data. I personally don't know much about this case but the reaction time is determined from the feets pressure on the blocks and measuring errors have occured there before.
@@Leo99z No. "the decision actually could be based on incorrect data" No. "I personally don't know much about this case" No kidding? "the reaction time is determined from the feets pressure on the blocks" No shit. "measuring errors have occured there before" No. Drummond later admitted that he didn't even know the rules regarding false starts caused by flinching, so don't feel bad you're not the only clueless one. "I didn't understand the rule to mean that a flinch is a false start". End of fucking story.
@@truefunksoul8638 Yes there has been measuring errors, for instance regarding very slow reaction times. What I meant to say with my comment was that as an athlete in the moment when you're not 100% sure that the technology isn't fucking with you a sceptical reaction isn't too far fetched. Talking generally.
This has got to suck, you work so hard for an event this big and you get all the way to the final with the fastest men on Earth in the world championships premier sprinting distance then after 2 guys are disqualified for false starts (including the world's fastest man at the time Asafa Powell) the slow guy who was never a threat for the medals but with an ego only matched by his immaturity levels decides to have a hissy fit and spoil the event for all the non-disqualified competitors who are actually still in the race.
@@truefunksoul8638 No, this is 2003, Powell had never run a sub-10.00 100 m at this point. Drummond had, although he was past his prime. This was a wide open championship, eventually won with 10.07, so Drummond (and many others) denifitely knew this was their only chance. I'm not writing this to justify his actions, just to clear up the background.
@@davidkoczo2166 Clear as mud. Nice try but a quick check of the records shows that Powell ran the fastest heat time of 10.05 which he would have naturally improved on through the meet. Drummond ran 10.22 which was faster than only 13 of the other qualifiers for the 4 quarter finals (32 athletes total) so he was highly unlikely to even make the final. Powell was likely to have won it in 10 sec flat form, not that he necessarily would have with his poor major final record throughout his career but this was much more a missed opportunity for him than for a guy like Drummond who was usually about 3rd or 4th fastest American at major championships and never won anything individually, not even a US title. I'm just putting his petulant display into perspective, it's not like it was the final. For the record Powell reacted in 0.086 which is almost legit but Drummond's time of 0.052 to react is absolutely impossible.
@irocedtube The system used to work in the way that if you moved "too fast", meaning... faster than you can react to sound, it would signal a false start. This system is no longer active. Drummond reacted in 52 milliseconds wich isn't possible, meaning he took a chance, still he didn't start before the signal wich tests have showed afterwards.
This is the most beautiful action in the history of athletics (for me). John Drummond is my master. Likewise, I did. He did not move ... xD Powel also did well going back to the block xD Yours!
The blokes athletic acheivements are tarnished now. Drummond is now serving an 8 year ban from the suplying of steroids to athletes he coached. If he was prepared to supply his trainees then its fair to say he was prepared to take them when competing to.
It could also be argued that he may have been clean then, but after this event he got bitter, thinking along the lines of : “Fuck it, give 'em what they want...” And what _they_ want is athletes performing beyond what can be achieved naturally, because it generates more profit - just don't get caught, that's the only rule nowadays.
Drummond is one of the best starters. When they trained he was the best starter, Maurice Greene and ato boldon said that. This was a corrupt system in Paris,period.
HE DIDDDDD NOTTTTTTT MOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111
Yes....100 milliseconds is still standard....but it dosent assume that you cant react in less than that time.....with the digital system, if your in then your in!
the system should change give each athlete 3 tries. if he jumps the gun 3 times then he cannot race what happens if everyone reacts too fast then everyone is disqualified and you have no race at all
I remember watching this live in 2003 and they showed a close up of him in his blocks. One of his feet twitched on the blocks and it registered with the sensor.
I'll admit the call was wrong. It was not a false start. However this is still disgraceful and disrespectful to the other athletes. I can certainly understand his frustration, but if any other country acted like that, American media would be all over it.
@LiveAthletics he said why me because he was also in the 1996 olympics finals false start drama that linford christie refused to leave the track.. many people think if it wasnt for all that drama ato would be olympic champion and not Bailey..all the drama and waiting and hooplaw threw him off his game and he came 3rd.. he was definately the man to beat at that olympics
asafa powell has a very fast start thats why it seemed like he false started. look at the reaction times and see that drummond was the one who budged first. it was not fair to asafa powell because even though the reaction time list shows him false starting. mr drummond was clearly the one who made the greater error so why did they remove them both. thats not fair
There is fault on both sides here........Drummond for his behaviour, and the French for using a proffessional sports meet to test a new sonic starting system. It operates based on the theory that a human cannot react in less than 100 milliseconds. Drummond reacted in 52 milliseconds which means he guessed the start and got it right! The system does not allow for reactions less than the allotted time. Since then they have disposed of this system and implemented a digital one.
Did you see that? They have the video recording and the sociopath is denying it. That's why you don't allow sociopaths to look good at people's expense. You make their sociopathy worse. You make them become more evil, more dastardly, and more corrupt. You make them learn to lie with detection and get better at covering up. They don't even know and understand what they're doing when they're making them look good at people's expense.
Some athletes looked as if they clearly moved before the gun started , I didn't see any false start from him , I believe he actually reacted that fast , wasn't fair for them to just take it away like that.
I looked this up cause it was mentioned in an article I read today but what it says is that he delayed the race and layed down on the track etc and I thought "what a whiny bitch" but watching this... this guy never moved! So he's entitled to his fit. He trained his whole life for this, sucks he got screwed.
I remember this one.........it just got worse and worse.......he just keeps digging himslf further and further into a hole......the officials arent goning to change their minds.
False start = Impusling on the starting blocks less than 100ms before the gun shoots. Both of them did impulse too early. That's it, just hazard both did at that time.
@jefflyall94 Easy for you to say. These athletes have trained their whole lifes to get there. Obviously both he and powell got unrightfully disqualified for false start, you cant even imagine how that must have felt for them.
Back here after the 200m final 2024. So much passion from Drummond here absolutely loved it, remember watching this live.
I am here also lol
the funny thing is that he didnt accually false start, experts have investigated that drummond reacted faster than possible for a human beeing - they said it was like he "sensed" the shot before it even had been shot
did he mention that he didn't move?
Yes, maybe he should have mentioned more
I'm having trouble seeing where the false start was.
Il n'y a pas que le départ avant les autre qui est considéré comme un "faux-départ", il y a aussi la pression appliquée sur les starting block. Ces pressions sont analysées pour voir quand l'impulsion du sprinter a commencé.
L'athlète ne soit mettre aucune pression sur les blocks avant le coup de feu.
GOOGLE TRANSLATE -> FRENCH
okay, that makes sense
Dieu Donné tu dit ''il n'y a pas que le départ avant les autres qui fait office de faux départ'' mais c'est faux. En aucun cas on discalifie un sprinteur car il a eu un meilleur temps de réaction que les autres.... le faux départ n'est pas une affaire de comparaison... en sprint il n'y a en réalité qu'une seule façon de faire un faux départ.. BOUGER AVANT LE SIGNAL DU STARTER
@@elielibong1617 Tu devrais lire les règles avant de dire n'importe quoi vieux.
ikr that's because I did not move.
he is one of the best starters in history this time technology was wrong
I can't tell if joking
if so very amusing
if not, even funnier
Was technology is shit
i feel bad for drummond this was his real last chance to get a individual medal.. he was nearly 35 at this time.. and he has never won any individual medal in his over 10 year career.. only Relay.. so i feel it for him here.. and seeing how the finals was won in a pedestrian 10.07 who knows what might have happened had drummond made it.. sad sad
respect for drummond, RESPECT!
My favourite part was when he said, "I did not move."
Timestamp?
ce qu'il faut retenir, c'est que ce n'est pas simplement le fait de partir avant les 100 millième qui vous donne un faut départ, mais simplement le fait de faire bouger un peu les start avec vos jambes tremblantes, rien qu'une minuscule pression de 100gr sur les bloc déclenche le faut départ
Elodie Lefebvre heu....tu dis exactement la même chose. si tu est partie avant les 100 millièmes de secondes,c'est que tu as effectué une pression sur les starting block avant les 100 millièmes de secondes...par contre tu peux très bien effectuer une pression sur les block sans pour autant partir,ce qui vaudra toujours une disqualification si cela c'est fait à 100 millièmes de secondes après le coup de feu du starter...oui car les sprinter ne sont en général pas disqualifiés parce qu'ils sont partis avant le coup de feux,mais plutôt parce qu'il sont partis certe après le coup de feux,mais le temps de réaction qu'ils ont eu est humainement impossible,le temps que l'information arrive au cerveau puis que le cerveau donne l'ordre de aux muscles,il est impossible pour un homme de partir a 100 millièmes de secondes après le coup de feux du starter. ..
Pour partir vite tous les athlètes poussent dans les starts avant et pendant les 100 millième de seconde, Les chercheurs ont de plus calculé que Bolt avait une puissance maximale de 2.619,5 watts après seulement 0,89 seconde de course.
C'est le fait de relâcher ou de "tamponner" les blocks qui donne un faux départ.
C'est la différence de poussée de quelques kilos dans les blocs à peu près une tonne et le relâchement prématuré ou non qui font la différence au départ.
jon did not move, looks like he was one of the last ones to move.
i was in the stadium that day , nobody clearly understood why everything stopped for so long time , i've heard about the "i did not move" later
On all the starts every one moved after the gun was sounded
most false starts do occur after the gun sounds. However because there is a generally accepted minimum reaction time that a human can have to the gun if you move before that point you must have reacted before the gun sounded
I think people don't imagine what's 4 years of work.
1/20 of his lifetime, dedicated for one big thing.
Taken away by a false start.
Jury needs to be more fair than that..
They get 3 major titles every 4 years; 2 Worlds and 1 Olympics. There had already been a false start and under the new rules at the time any break after that is out. No ifs, buts, or maybes. Asafa Powell was also eliminated here, and he never won a major title in his career apart from relays despite holding the world record for several years and breaking 10 sec more times than any human in history. Spare a thought for him. Drummond never won anything at the world level apart from 2 relays either, and he wouldn't have won this he was years past his prime and his career PB was only 9.92. Regardless of all that his behaviour here is completely unacceptable. He disrespects the sport, the judges, his competitors, his team, his country, and the crowd. Funny though!
True Funk Soldier he got cheated of course he’s gonna act like that
@@truefunksoul8638 just stfu, you could clearly see drummon didnt false start. He naturally has a quick reaction. They need to change these stupid and outdated false start measurements, going on the B of the bang isnt a false start 😑😑😑
Kristoffer McCarthy fuck off dickhead. I can "clearly see" that you're a butt-hurt American still failing to accept reality all these years later, or an embarrassed relative of the shamefully arrogant ego-maniac crybaby prima donna Drummond. "He naturally has a quick reaction" !! Thanks for the laughs champ. Did I mention go fuck yourself?
@@truefunksoul8638 I'm English and to me that looked like they all went in almost perfect synchronicity. People get DQ'd all the time and know instantly they messed up. His behaviour wasn't great but it is understandable when he was clearly certain he went after the gun.
he did not move before the gun sounded.
Maybe not but he moved within a physically impossible time to hear the gun then react; that's measurable and he got a jump on it, so it's a false start. It's not like there's some judge doing it with the naked eye, the sensor in his blocks detected him moving too fast. He didn't break as clearly as Powell who was beside him but he broke, and that's why they were both disqualified. It was a new rule about disqualifying anyone who broke in a restart which came in that year, then it was changed back in 2009 because slower guys were tactically breaking on purpose in the initial start to put pressure on the faster guys in the restart not to break.
@@truefunksoul8638 If it wasn't before, then he didn't move before the gun
@raoulhery
Yeah! I don't know exactly how this system was working but if you look carefully at 2:52, he clearly did not move. Powell clearly started too early but Drummond did not. He actually still had his feet on the blocks while Dwight Thomas on the 3rd lane moved his back feet before him.
Je n'oublierai jamais cette course, j'avais 10ans.. (ça passe vite :o)
j'étais fasciné par cet homme et son 'I did not move'
Cool ta vie
Nous sommes deux alors !!! Les Championnats du monde Paris Saint-Denis mémorables !
Pareil aussi 10 ans
pareil generation 1993
he did not move. starting in less than 0.1 seconds after the gun fires is considered false start, however, there have been a few athletes with very developed reflexes that have been able to react under 0.1 seconds. it was such a pity for drummond :(
rubbish. its physiologically impossible to react faster. they even have a fudge factor in it to allow for the benefit of the doubt. the start will reflect a false if its faster than 0.10 and scientists have proven that no one can react faster than 0.12.
rcaddict72 yes, it's impossible that the brain send an order in less than 0.1 seconds, but, a reflex it's so much faster
Manuel Alejandro Ramírez Ambrosio well, there's been an athlete from finland who was put on test and, his nervous system was monitored and he was able to react in between 0.08 and 0.1 seconds. This made the scientist formulate a theory about muscles "receiving" the wave sounds directly instead of receiving the stimulus only with the hearing system, altohugh this theory couldn't be totally explained. this finnish athlete was able to legally react in very litle less than 0.1 seconds. so we can say it's just almost possible, but very, very rare. and , as you see in the video drummond didn't move before the sound. which, could be a case of super fast reaction, as this finnish athlete
goldy bolt, source, name, something?
ok, it´s been already a few months, but let me refresh the info i had about this Garage Sale
Oh j’avais 12ans sa passe vite j’ai pleuré quand il est sorti
I Did Not Move: The J. Drummond Story
Blockbuster right here^
that's messed up. He really didn't move
Jonny Woodburn This is the race that caused Asafa so much trauma. The look of bewilderment on his face when he's shown the red cared says it all. This must be replaying in his head just before each race. Someone needs to help him root out the problem rasta. Can't mek him go to waste like this. Can't bear it bredren....jus can't.
Was this one of those situations where he false started because his reaction time was too fast?
I saw a video saying that its possible to be DQ'd if you launch off the block right as the gun goes off because its physically impossible for a human to react that fast and thus, its a false start
yes
which is a pathetic standard
YES! Jon was always lightning fast out the blocks which is why he was always on the first leg for the US relay team.
I know I’m late with this comment but exactly right
If your whole life revolves around training for this race, how else can you react when you know you are getting unfairly screwed....he did a good job not punching whoever was responsible for the bogus call
Get off the fucking track because you're disqualified for breaking the start? Just a thought, crazy I know.
Typical black mentality
The system was corrupt and sorry john,they got you!
This was as simultaneous as it gets. Drummond didn't not move.
2:50 You what Jon was right they WRONGLY disqualified him..he literally was one of the last ones to move they robbed him
Video doesn't lie: Drummond did NOT false start.
2:51 shows Powell moving FIRST, of all things.
What an absurd call. The official should have been removed from the sport.
this video is basically me playing statues as a kid lol
Just because he believes he "didn't move" before the gun does not mean he didn't false start. The system measures how soon after the gun does the runner apply foot pressure on the blocks. You can apply pressure on the blocks with your feet before any other part of the body moves.
If pressure is sensed on any of the blocks less then 0.1 seconds after the gun , a false start is given to each runner who broke that time limit.
The reasoning is that no human can react to the gun faster than 0.1 seconds after hearing it. It takes at least 0.1 seconds for the brain to "hear" the gun and then command the muscles to react. So the logic is , if the sensors in the blocks sense pressure in less than 0.1 seconds after the gun, the runner did not react to the gun but instead "jumped" the gun, ie: the runner anticipated when the gun would sound..
Imo, they should not false start a runner as long as the runner put pressure on the blocks after the gun. How close to "after" the gun shouldn't matter as long as it's AFTER the gun.
If you want to take luck out of the equation and prevent runners from getting an advantage by "guessing" when the gun will sound, then don't always fire the gun at the same interval after the "get set" command is given. Use arbitrary intervals within fair limits.
For those thinking that each runner should be given one false start.
Several reasons why they had to scrap that past procedure but the main one was that if each runner got one false start you could end up taking an hour on every race just to get the race started. Knowing you get one false start gives a runner great incentive to "jump" the gun in the hopes of getting away with it . No penalty if it doesn't work out.
He did the right thing
How would you react if you spend months studying for an exam, and then on the big day you got kicked out of the examination room all because of a false claim?
Obviously after the terrible injustice of being disqualified for breaking the start I would throw a tantrum like a little 5-year old child and refuse to leave the examination room while lying flat on my back in denial that I just broke the start thereby disrupting the exam for all other students for about 10 or 15 minutes before going to the locker room to cry my eyes out. Then I would learn the rules of my chosen subject so I would understand how not to break them in future exams. I would also try to learn the basic concepts of accepting the judges' decision and how to not be a sore loser crybaby embarrassing little bitch disgrace to my country. Isn't that what everyone would do?
@@truefunksoul8638 No, as the decision actually could be based on incorrect data. I personally don't know much about this case but the reaction time is determined from the feets pressure on the blocks and measuring errors have occured there before.
@@Leo99z No.
"the decision actually could be based on incorrect data" No.
"I personally don't know much about this case" No kidding?
"the reaction time is determined from the feets pressure on the blocks" No shit.
"measuring errors have occured there before" No.
Drummond later admitted that he didn't even know the rules regarding false starts caused by flinching, so don't feel bad you're not the only clueless one. "I didn't understand the rule to mean that a flinch is a false start". End of fucking story.
@@truefunksoul8638 Yes there has been measuring errors, for instance regarding very slow reaction times. What I meant to say with my comment was that as an athlete in the moment when you're not 100% sure that the technology isn't fucking with you a sceptical reaction isn't too far fetched. Talking generally.
9:09 "get away from me with the fucking camera"
get off the fucking track then crybaby
he really didnt move! WHen you watch closely you see that he start with the all guyz! Powell was clearly out
Who’s here after Devon Allen got robbed
This has got to suck, you work so hard for an event this big and it's taken away that quickly
This has got to suck, you work so hard for an event this big and you get all the way to the final with the fastest men on Earth in the world championships premier sprinting distance then after 2 guys are disqualified for false starts (including the world's fastest man at the time Asafa Powell) the slow guy who was never a threat for the medals but with an ego only matched by his immaturity levels decides to have a hissy fit and spoil the event for all the non-disqualified competitors who are actually still in the race.
@@truefunksoul8638 No, this is 2003, Powell had never run a sub-10.00 100 m at this point. Drummond had, although he was past his prime. This was a wide open championship, eventually won with 10.07, so Drummond (and many others) denifitely knew this was their only chance.
I'm not writing this to justify his actions, just to clear up the background.
@@davidkoczo2166 Clear as mud. Nice try but a quick check of the records shows that Powell ran the fastest heat time of 10.05 which he would have naturally improved on through the meet. Drummond ran 10.22 which was faster than only 13 of the other qualifiers for the 4 quarter finals (32 athletes total) so he was highly unlikely to even make the final. Powell was likely to have won it in 10 sec flat form, not that he necessarily would have with his poor major final record throughout his career but this was much more a missed opportunity for him than for a guy like Drummond who was usually about 3rd or 4th fastest American at major championships and never won anything individually, not even a US title. I'm just putting his petulant display into perspective, it's not like it was the final. For the record Powell reacted in 0.086 which is almost legit but Drummond's time of 0.052 to react is absolutely impossible.
@irocedtube The system used to work in the way that if you moved "too fast", meaning... faster than you can react to sound, it would signal a false start. This system is no longer active. Drummond reacted in 52 milliseconds wich isn't possible, meaning he took a chance, still he didn't start before the signal wich tests have showed afterwards.
Is Alex Osbourne & Emily Wood big fan of sporting programmes? Are they going to watch the world athletics championships?
This is the most beautiful action in the history of athletics (for me). John Drummond is my master. Likewise, I did. He did not move ... xD
Powel also did well going back to the block xD
Yours!
Drummond a cheat and liar ruining the moment for the other athletes who trained their whole lives for that. Ass...le!
Legend
Drummond got Robbed
Big time.
they f*cked up my career
Something about him reminds me of Tupac
Technology was wrong. He didn’t false start. He was just punished for his skill. One of the fastest starters in athletics history.
Un grand moment de sport !!!!
The blokes athletic acheivements are tarnished now. Drummond is now serving an 8 year ban from the suplying of steroids to athletes he coached. If he was prepared to supply his trainees then its fair to say he was prepared to take them when competing to.
It could also be argued that he may have been clean then, but after this event he got bitter, thinking along the lines of : “Fuck it, give 'em what they want...” And what _they_ want is athletes performing beyond what can be achieved naturally, because it generates more profit - just don't get caught, that's the only rule nowadays.
Asafa would win that world championship
He did not Moooove though! Lol 😂
he didn't procedure the line
hes right, look at the replays, he did not move
Drummond is one of the best starters.
When they trained he was the best starter, Maurice Greene and ato boldon said that.
This was a corrupt system in Paris,period.
I did not move, it's not true, it's bullshit, I did not move, I did not. Oh, hi Mark.
powell looks much thinner here! Today Powell looks about 20lbs heavier than he does here, he's put on muscle like Bolt!
Couldnt u have found the English version for this
HE DIDDDDD NOTTTTTTT MOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111
Yes....100 milliseconds is still standard....but it dosent assume that you cant react in less than that time.....with the digital system, if your in then your in!
i see live ang it was amazing!!!
He really didnt move!
the system should change give each athlete 3 tries. if he jumps the gun 3 times then he cannot race what happens if everyone reacts too fast then everyone is disqualified and you have no race at all
i did not move!!
Jonas Philip 😂👍🏻🎈
Lane three moved, not Drummond lane 4
Yea I saw that
He probably didn't move but he might of just triggered the sensor on the blocks
I remember watching this live in 2003 and they showed a close up of him in his blocks. One of his feet twitched on the blocks and it registered with the sensor.
0,059 sec wow impressive. It s impossible for normal ppl to react like that he did an amazing start and he s disqualified... come on -_-
So the other ran a 100m without any warm up ?
That was almost dangerous...
man that's fucked up
Oooo now I understood. Drummond alongside Boldon and Maurice Greene were training partners. That's why Ato got that ffffucking pissed off
I'll admit the call was wrong. It was not a false start. However this is still disgraceful and disrespectful to the other athletes. I can certainly understand his frustration, but if any other country acted like that, American media would be all over it.
Here after Devon Allen got robbed
does anybody have any movies from decoration from that championships? , that music was outstanding
@LiveAthletics he said why me because he was also in the 1996 olympics finals false start drama that linford christie refused to leave the track.. many people think if it wasnt for all that drama ato would be olympic champion and not Bailey..all the drama and waiting and hooplaw threw him off his game and he came 3rd.. he was definately the man to beat at that olympics
asafa powell has a very fast start thats why it seemed like he false started. look at the reaction times and see that drummond was the one who budged first. it was not fair to asafa powell because even though the reaction time list shows him false starting. mr drummond was clearly the one who made the greater error so why did they remove them both. thats not fair
He did not move!
Il a fait une pression sans partir, car sur la vidéo du départ il part après 3 autres coureurs
There is fault on both sides here........Drummond for his behaviour, and the French for using a proffessional sports meet to test a new sonic starting system. It operates based on the theory that a human cannot react in less than 100 milliseconds. Drummond reacted in 52 milliseconds which means he guessed the start and got it right! The system does not allow for reactions less than the allotted time. Since then they have disposed of this system and implemented a digital one.
Sounds like Chris Tucker
Did you see that? They have the video recording and the sociopath is denying it. That's why you don't allow sociopaths to look good at people's expense. You make their sociopathy worse. You make them become more evil, more dastardly, and more corrupt. You make them learn to lie with detection and get better at covering up. They don't even know and understand what they're doing when they're making them look good at people's expense.
poor old ato boldon...his races always shafted by these incidents including linford juice christie
He did not move....
Remember watching this as a kid, lool look at a young Asafa Powell!
LMAO "00:50" the camera and sound guy race over to follow him to catch the drama on audio and film lol
Some athletes looked as if they clearly moved before the gun started , I didn't see any false start from him , I believe he actually reacted that fast , wasn't fair for them to just take it away like that.
Sometimes your the bug and sometimes your the windshield........Drummond was the bug on this occasion!
I looked this up cause it was mentioned in an article I read today but what it says is that he delayed the race and layed down on the track etc and I thought "what a whiny bitch" but watching this... this guy never moved! So he's entitled to his fit. He trained his whole life for this, sucks he got screwed.
Quand tu penses être victime d une injustice....
I think he did not move ... :)
@WastemanDotCom
start reaction of both was too fast, under 0,12 second and that´s not allowed
I remember this one.........it just got worse and worse.......he just keeps digging himslf further and further into a hole......the officials arent goning to change their minds.
But the racers couldn see it, we saw cause of the slow motion tape, dont be silly.
He didn't move!?
Jon definitely didn’t move.
haha jme rappelle de ce moment trop!!!! jcherchais la video g trouvéééééééééééé!!!
False start = Impusling on the starting blocks less than 100ms before the gun shoots. Both of them did impulse too early. That's it, just hazard both did at that time.
that is pure corruption and robbery, he actually didn't move
I can say for sure that he did not move
he didnt move!
tell em
@Track Nation I did not move!
@Track Nation Nope, mate. I did not move.
I think all the athletes should have said they wouldnt run if Drummond wasn't allowed to run they all should have protested
So fucked up. This rule is shit. Shud be able to make 3 false starts each. Even if it takes 20mins. It took them 20+ years to get to there.
@jefflyall94
Easy for you to say. These athletes have trained their whole lifes to get there. Obviously both he and powell got unrightfully disqualified for false start, you cant even imagine how that must have felt for them.
really unfair, u cant diss 2 runners in same time!
Systeme corrompu,drummond allait ecraser cette course!
very unfair - two runners with red card at same time
if someone moved it was the guy to his right