The APS is indeed a softkill APS. They explained in an official PLA documentary (only in Chinese ofc). But basically it is suppose to shoot a laser that screws with the optics of incoming missiles. Supposedly, it works against all types of modern ATGMS, even those with fire and forget capability. The problem is that it's not available on export tanks, so no one really knows what it can do.
that sound like a lot of horse shit. Considering that Russian Tank had to use Cope Cage though they had basically the same shit on T-90, i doubt those "laser" can work that well against Javelin and NLAW.
@@quangnhat5345 It's suppose to blind the enemy gunner via search and track when lazed. How effective that is remains to be seen. Although China does have its own hardkill defense but its not implemented on the 99s but on the vt-4 and ztq-15.
@@quangnhat5345 Cope cages were used because Russians used their tanks in situations that let's them get ambushed from the side/rear. China's armored doctrine strictly uses their tanks to engage frontally. Their tanks' sole purpose is to defeat other tanks/vehicles so the infantry can move in to clean up. The laser dazzler systems work well when facing enemies frontally.
Searching up "WZ-1001(E) LCT" will not yield any meaningful results, this is because there's rarely anyone that calls it by that. Speaking from anectodal experience no one calls it that, it is more commonly known as the WZ-123A (Y), it is kind of a niche prototype produced in the early 2000s before the actual ZTZ-99A as we know it now was finalized along with other prototypes like the ZTZ-99A pr.No2 of which the prototype No2 is more akin to the finalized ZTZ-99A. The main difference between the 2010 production variant ZTZ-99A and this vehicle is that the hull and turret is more akin to ZTZ-99 II and III with disparties in dimensions, this is also noticable in the positioning of the driver which is in the centre of the hull and isn't offset like on the 2010 and 2016 production variants of the ZTZ-99A (difference between the two ZTZ-99A's being more nuanced, this mainly was about improving the reliability of the vehicle itself with the most notable difference being the removal of the millimeter wave radar which was also not present on the prototypes) and obviously an L/54 gun instead of the L/48, the main reason why this gun was rejected was because of the short barrel life, other noticable differences includes the layout of the ERA, the first row of FY-4 on the hull is only 5 blocks wide instead of the 6 on ZTZ-99As also the following rows of FY-4 on the hull isn't elevated like on prototype No.2 or on ZTZ-99As. Moving onto the JD-3 APS which is present on all ZTZ-99s. The system itself is a soft kill APS and is part of a suite being slaved to smoke dispensers, laser warning receiver and the control unit. The JD-3 itself is made up of a infrared emitter, power unit and a control panel, the whole system weighing about 75 Kg (Information from the source I'm using is old and there are discrepencies between the system that is actually installed and the system being described in the source, so one must note the possibility of the system that is actually deployed might be downgrade from this initial prototype stage due to cost or other reasons, alas this is the only source I have access to). The JD-3 emitter has a 5 degree range of elevation/depression with an unknown range of horizontal coverage (maybe 360 degrees, no sources to confirm). The working procedure of the system is as follows, after a threat is detected, the emitter will emit a 0.7-2.5 µm wavelength infrared radiation pulse signal within 2 seconds, jamming any infrared guided munitions, the system could also be used as an infrared illuminator if required, being slaved to type 94 smoke grenade launcher and type 97 smoke grenades it can form smoke cover within 50-80 m range from the tank within 3 seconds, interfering with laser range finders and laser designators, being most effective against those of 0.4-14 µm wavelengths. It was determined that the JD-3 along with its accompanying suite of systems can reduce the hit probability of a SACLOS missile by 2/3-4/5. Also contrary to popular belief the ZTZ-99 autoloader does not reload faster than your typical t72, the video showing a supposed "6.5 second reload" is edited and does not include the entire reloading process, the actual loading time in war thunder is a realistic representation if not faster than actual due to the fact that war thunder doesn't take into account the time it takes to spin the carousel in order to retrieve ammunition, this information originates from a document that has a graph dictating the entire loading process with time stamps for different stages. If you are interested I can provide more nuanced explanation and sources about the ZTZ-99 family of tanks, you can also try searching up Wang Zherong, he was the project lead of the WZ123A (Y).
ZTZ-96 and ZTZ-99 both had worse reload time before some update released during 2021 or earlier 2022, if I'm not mistaken here.They had 7.5 reload time, slowest reload among other top tier MBTs including russian ones. Maybe gaijin just wanted to buff chinese MBTs, even it's not absolutely 100% accurate, because many complained about these tanks as one of the worst top tier MBTs overall.
Its sheduled for 2024, at the moment its a mere prototype, while the 2S38 is available in low numbers, this new ztz99 is not really available for the PLA yet its being tested by the manufactor for every eventuality, i have no clue why gaijin added this.
Man i the T80 BVM who pushed your team in 20:00, that match was close but my team didnt ping any enemy location toward the ending of the match, hence we lost via score!!! I would love you to spread awareness of pointing out location of enemies in critical time (when tickets are draining faster) so that its less frustrating to play in. Hope to see you in future battles!
I've been told it uses the 99-II/III hull. Also another bonus is that despite having the 1,500 engine and better transmission, it does not suffer from nato hump like the 99A
type 99s are some of the most sexy looking tank out there, I would say they are on par with Leos, idk why btw, aren't all type 99s have 600mm+ pen with apfsds? The pen value in game are so wierd
TBF all top tier rounds ingame are way too underpowered compared to their IRL counterpart a good example is abrams silver bullet m829a1 has an estimated penetration of 600mm at 2km so yea you dont want that ingame, and if increasing the armor is the solution to balance it out then raising the pen to 600+ doesnt change a thing having the extended gun only increase the pen by a miniscule amount might suck but its similar to 2a5/2a6 if you look at the difference in their round its tiny also 510+ pen will perform same until its 630 so only the 2a6 has the penetration advantage unless your facing russian sideskirts that sometimes overperforms my main issue with the chinese tanks are its autoloaders since im pretty sure its same as the russian ones on the T72 last note ZTZ99 and leo are no where near the being a sexy tank its the CCVL
@@jPlanerv2 They use Russian ammo testing standard, where 80% of rounds have to get to the stated penetration, where nato needs 50% rounds to do that as far as I know, that could be why western ammo has lowered values too. Or so the people said a while ago
I’m irritated by the longer barrel not giving a pen boost like the difference between the Leo 2a5/6 Nvm just realized they did change it from the day one patch. Nice.
@@sadge1234 yea and the pen should be more too. This tank is literally worse in every way than it is IRL. It’s almost like gaijin nerfed it on purpose so that it’s not better than Russian tanks.
@@kanestalin7246 Fixed 3BM-60 has 330mm @ 10m at 60 degrees - Fixed 3BM-59 has 335mm @ 10m at 60 degrees DTC10-125 is the king of all 125mm APFSDS rounds
The snail did changes some maps. Both Poland, normal and winter, have changes (Alpha cap now have a different terrain depression on the winter both big and small version, and the rocks as said in the video on the lake), same story for Aral where some train cars are added to the norther right spawn to prevent the use of the hull down position (but you can still aim under or between them). Honestly i rather prefer a changelog just about map editing, even when the map is just another "version" (with Poland now, they demonstrate that there are two of the "same" map but totally different). Still Golden Quarry have a glitched steel beam in the river to Alpha that eats shots even aiming between the empty spaces, not to mention the fences eating up even APFSDS😒
@@henryl531 Gaijin map design never disappoint, like Middle East lower west spawn or the big version of Mozdok northern spawn with a massive killzone from Alpha to Bravo...😬
i do belive the 99a and wz1001 have a reload closer to 5 or 6 sec but balance I guess since your not aloud to have good reload and good armor at top tier
From my understanding it's an export model, lct meaning Long Cannon Testbed. That camera system on the top is exclusive to China and what it does is when an enemy lazer rangefinds you that camera on top there will turn to the optics that just lazed you and blast a Lazer beam into the camera system. Pure disruption. 😂😂😂 Wish gaijin would model it in.
Wonder if they will ever add the m1a2t to the Taiwan line, be nice addition especially with other nations getting vehicles from other nations like Sweden getting both t80 and a 2a6
Damn how far you grinded the tree. Most Chinese players never went that far(or like me just got premiums in the sale and grind it when feeling the vibe)
lmao just a reminder that those XM-1s still are stuck with shit M735... at 9.3... with missing smoke launchers; and the M1 Abrams still doesnt have M833.
I'm pretty sure the ztz99a has a 6.5 second relaod irl, same as the t80u and bvm. There's sufficient videos to suggest this online. The thing is pretty sure China has denied any cooperation with Russia on their auto loader, whereas evidence suggests that Russia either showed them their new auto loader or China stole the designs....
Type99 is a copycat of t-72m that they bought in the Middle East. Since they copied autoloader from it, I'm pretty sure it's not 6.5. And installing a loading mechanism from T-80 would require them to basically redesign the tank and chinese didn't had acces to it early enough to do so, they wouldn't be compatable with all the ammunition from T-90, which it is. T-72 autoloader also can be faster than 7.1, as well as slower based on type of ammunition and it's position in the carousel. So no, it's not the same as mechanism as T-80U or BVM.
@@ГригорийПротченко-н9р The type99 is probably the great great great grandson of the t-54/55 from what i've read. The ztz96 on the other hand is more of a copy of the t-72. Same size, same height similar roadwheels, etc. The type99A has nothing to do with any Russian tanks. It's significantly more advance and incorporate western influence in the mix and it's a uniquely Chinese vehicle.
Hey Justin i don't know will you se this, but is there some possibility tu make a videos for all tanks start from low tier for every country. It gets some kind boring watching every chanel showing a battle video for new vehicle. We want to se old tanks again with a new battle sistem. Please. Thank you
"fork over $70 for a virtual tank and in return we take that money and put into another game that is gonna crash and burn just as badly as the game your dumping your hard earned money into!"
14.5mg is broken now, got bug report on it already. And there is slightly different turret design for the new one. Also proxy HE kinda broken, it just does no damage or just HIT, and its 5.3kg of TNT... And i dont know why chinese didnt place their FY4 or 5 on the sides...
For train transport. The tanks are way to thicck for Chinese railway. Still it’s a poor excuse for no side era, even tho their export tanks have side era and APS systems (vt-4).
Are you talking about putting it on the hull sides? They probably do have kits for them but since China isn't at war they don't have them installed as they put unnecessary weight if your going to just display it.
Hey Justin big fan. I'm a fellow streamer on twitch and would like to maybe sometime get some games in with you. I've spent most of my time grinding through the American tree.
*China's tank division!* Haha prototype Type 99A with longer gun go brrr. And apparently even has a 14.5mm for its HMG despite sharing the same model as the Russian/Chinese 12.7mm...
@@quocvinhnguyen2063 I'm not playing wot, just watching streams sometimes, if this tank existed, it's good to hear that, I'm not historical tank expert, just was curious listening JP, he is called this tank non existent
The sm7b is a fantastic mic, to fix the percussive mouth sounds, simplest option is a pop filter/mic shield, should sort out the problem, if not you can turn down the gain slightly on your audio interface and increase the volume of the mic post production. 😁 thos are the easiest ways to deal with the issue
The APS is indeed a softkill APS.
They explained in an official PLA documentary (only in Chinese ofc). But basically it is suppose to shoot a laser that screws with the optics of incoming missiles. Supposedly, it works against all types of modern ATGMS, even those with fire and forget capability.
The problem is that it's not available on export tanks, so no one really knows what it can do.
that sound like a lot of horse shit. Considering that Russian Tank had to use Cope Cage though they had basically the same shit on T-90, i doubt those "laser" can work that well against Javelin and NLAW.
@@quangnhat5345 It's suppose to blind the enemy gunner via search and track when lazed. How effective that is remains to be seen. Although China does have its own hardkill defense but its not implemented on the 99s but on the vt-4 and ztq-15.
@@quangnhat5345 "Thing is defeated by another thing created a decade later" No shit Sherlock.
@@lebien4554 the Javelin entered service in 1996
@@quangnhat5345 Cope cages were used because Russians used their tanks in situations that let's them get ambushed from the side/rear. China's armored doctrine strictly uses their tanks to engage frontally. Their tanks' sole purpose is to defeat other tanks/vehicles so the infantry can move in to clean up. The laser dazzler systems work well when facing enemies frontally.
Searching up "WZ-1001(E) LCT" will not yield any meaningful results, this is because there's rarely anyone that calls it by that. Speaking from anectodal experience no one calls it that, it is more commonly known as the WZ-123A (Y), it is kind of a niche prototype produced in the early 2000s before the actual ZTZ-99A as we know it now was finalized along with other prototypes like the ZTZ-99A pr.No2 of which the prototype No2 is more akin to the finalized ZTZ-99A. The main difference between the 2010 production variant ZTZ-99A and this vehicle is that the hull and turret is more akin to ZTZ-99 II and III with disparties in dimensions, this is also noticable in the positioning of the driver which is in the centre of the hull and isn't offset like on the 2010 and 2016 production variants of the ZTZ-99A (difference between the two ZTZ-99A's being more nuanced, this mainly was about improving the reliability of the vehicle itself with the most notable difference being the removal of the millimeter wave radar which was also not present on the prototypes) and obviously an L/54 gun instead of the L/48, the main reason why this gun was rejected was because of the short barrel life, other noticable differences includes the layout of the ERA, the first row of FY-4 on the hull is only 5 blocks wide instead of the 6 on ZTZ-99As also the following rows of FY-4 on the hull isn't elevated like on prototype No.2 or on ZTZ-99As.
Moving onto the JD-3 APS which is present on all ZTZ-99s. The system itself is a soft kill APS and is part of a suite being slaved to smoke dispensers, laser warning receiver and the control unit. The JD-3 itself is made up of a infrared emitter, power unit and a control panel, the whole system weighing about 75 Kg (Information from the source I'm using is old and there are discrepencies between the system that is actually installed and the system being described in the source, so one must note the possibility of the system that is actually deployed might be downgrade from this initial prototype stage due to cost or other reasons, alas this is the only source I have access to). The JD-3 emitter has a 5 degree range of elevation/depression with an unknown range of horizontal coverage (maybe 360 degrees, no sources to confirm). The working procedure of the system is as follows, after a threat is detected, the emitter will emit a 0.7-2.5 µm wavelength infrared radiation pulse signal within 2 seconds, jamming any infrared guided munitions, the system could also be used as an infrared illuminator if required, being slaved to type 94 smoke grenade launcher and type 97 smoke grenades it can form smoke cover within 50-80 m range from the tank within 3 seconds, interfering with laser range finders and laser designators, being most effective against those of 0.4-14 µm wavelengths. It was determined that the JD-3 along with its accompanying suite of systems can reduce the hit probability of a SACLOS missile by 2/3-4/5.
Also contrary to popular belief the ZTZ-99 autoloader does not reload faster than your typical t72, the video showing a supposed "6.5 second reload" is edited and does not include the entire reloading process, the actual loading time in war thunder is a realistic representation if not faster than actual due to the fact that war thunder doesn't take into account the time it takes to spin the carousel in order to retrieve ammunition, this information originates from a document that has a graph dictating the entire loading process with time stamps for different stages.
If you are interested I can provide more nuanced explanation and sources about the ZTZ-99 family of tanks, you can also try searching up Wang Zherong, he was the project lead of the WZ123A (Y).
ZTZ-96 and ZTZ-99 both had worse reload time before some update released during 2021 or earlier 2022, if I'm not mistaken here.They had 7.5 reload time, slowest reload among other top tier MBTs including russian ones. Maybe gaijin just wanted to buff chinese MBTs, even it's not absolutely 100% accurate, because many complained about these tanks as one of the worst top tier MBTs overall.
Damn, props for the effort
this is very interesting!
thank you for providing it
Its sheduled for 2024, at the moment its a mere prototype, while the 2S38 is available in low numbers, this new ztz99 is not really available for the PLA yet its being tested by the manufactor for every eventuality, i have no clue why gaijin added this.
So what is better ZTZ-99A or the WZ1001
the APS on chinese MBTs are unique. instead of jamming signals, they're high powered lasers that go "no u" when the tank is lased.
So, a true laser gun?
@@Royaldamnpenguinmore like a jammer and makes the opponent’s targeting systems go nuts
Lazer dazzlers?
Man i the T80 BVM who pushed your team in 20:00, that match was close but my team didnt ping any enemy location toward the ending of the match, hence we lost via score!!! I would love you to spread awareness of pointing out location of enemies in critical time (when tickets are draining faster) so that its less frustrating to play in. Hope to see you in future battles!
I try to but most players are blind and don't bother looking at map (which I've set to largest size possible)
I've been told it uses the 99-II/III hull.
Also another bonus is that despite having the 1,500 engine and better transmission, it does not suffer from nato hump like the 99A
It’s does now. Lol
@@jeffrey9068 damn
14,5 mm is the best heavy machine gun hands down
my freedom senses disagree
9:58 your shell casing got ejected, bounced off the ground, then landed back on your tank! 🤣
didn't want to abandon Chinese Motherland for some reason
The 1810 m/s shell makes it so easy to aim
it's now the fastest shell in the game
anything above 900m/s is easy to aim
YESSSSSSSS CHINA MAINS REJOICE
type 99s are some of the most sexy looking tank out there, I would say they are on par with Leos, idk why
btw, aren't all type 99s have 600mm+ pen with apfsds? The pen value in game are so wierd
The reason why the apfsds doesn’t have at least 600mm of pen, because some dude decided to leak info of the round on warthunder forum
Most top tier shells under perform by a lot in this game, my theory is because of russian shells that are kinda true to their real life performance
TBF all top tier rounds ingame are way too underpowered compared to their IRL counterpart
a good example is abrams silver bullet m829a1 has an estimated penetration of 600mm at 2km so yea you dont want that ingame, and if increasing the armor is the solution to balance it out then raising the pen to 600+ doesnt change a thing
having the extended gun only increase the pen by a miniscule amount might suck but its similar to 2a5/2a6 if you look at the difference in their round its tiny
also 510+ pen will perform same until its 630 so only the 2a6 has the penetration advantage unless your facing russian sideskirts that sometimes overperforms
my main issue with the chinese tanks are its autoloaders since im pretty sure its same as the russian ones on the T72
last note ZTZ99 and leo are no where near the being a sexy tank its the CCVL
Gaijin uses its own penetration calculator for rounds. This artificially nerfs the rounds. You don’t want a top tier tank with 700mm pen at 2km
@@jPlanerv2 They use Russian ammo testing standard, where 80% of rounds have to get to the stated penetration, where nato needs 50% rounds to do that as far as I know, that could be why western ammo has lowered values too. Or so the people said a while ago
I’m irritated by the longer barrel not giving a pen boost like the difference between the Leo 2a5/6
Nvm just realized they did change it from the day one patch. Nice.
Serving China's needs.
China's tank division!
China will grow larger
The backside looks far uglier than any of the 99's
@@Signal_Fire Building the empire
*Battlemaster tank, reporting!*
Or not...
The back of the Abrams and Type-99 are definitely not similar. Abrams uses a turbine engine. ZTZ-99 uses a diesel. Justin… you know better…. Lol
Not internally.. visually o.o
The UFP of the 2 ZTZ 99a tanks are still shit for no reason. Literally worse than the ztz99 when it should be better
and the reload + gun handling is still inaccurate
@@sadge1234 yea and the pen should be more too. This tank is literally worse in every way than it is IRL. It’s almost like gaijin nerfed it on purpose so that it’s not better than Russian tanks.
@@Phantom-bh5ru whats with people makin a clown outta themselves with these arguments.
@@sadge1234 The gun is supposed to have atleast -7.5 depression.
I was surprised to see how well that ERA ate up those rounds
FY-5 is as strong as relict against kinetic rounds iirc so makes sense
i was in my old 99-III and bounced a t80 off the front plate then popped him. All within 150 meters
@@Dexteritas55 China is overlooked in OPness
@@rerec6266 it’s recent bro, they’ve turned it from D to S tier in the last 5 patches
@@Dexteritas55 99-III ufp is pretty strong able to bounce dm53 sometimes I think
Fixed DTC10-125 penetration
DTC10-125 L/48 (1760m/s)
348mm @ 10m at 60 degrees
DTC10-125 L/54 (1800m/s)
355mm @ 10m at 60 degrees
Amen to that
Is that good?
@@kanestalin7246
Fixed 3BM-60 has
330mm @ 10m at 60 degrees
-
Fixed 3BM-59 has
335mm @ 10m at 60 degrees
DTC10-125 is the king of all 125mm APFSDS rounds
@@janflorovic5880 ok thank you
@@janflorovic5880 seems gaijin weakened Chinese lol
Finally I've been waiting for this
i love playing chinese toptier it feels like you oneshot much more often with those 125mm than with the nato 120
Mostly because the hidden armor stats that cause russian and chinese armor create less fragmentation once penetrated than NATO tank.
@@quangnhat5345um since when were there chinese bias
Justin kills the hole enemy team and then proceeds to ask where they are XD
These reverse speeds are nuts
The snail did changes some maps.
Both Poland, normal and winter, have changes (Alpha cap now have a different terrain depression on the winter both big and small version, and the rocks as said in the video on the lake), same story for Aral where some train cars are added to the norther right spawn to prevent the use of the hull down position (but you can still aim under or between them). Honestly i rather prefer a changelog just about map editing, even when the map is just another "version" (with Poland now, they demonstrate that there are two of the "same" map but totally different).
Still Golden Quarry have a glitched steel beam in the river to Alpha that eats shots even aiming between the empty spaces, not to mention the fences eating up even APFSDS😒
Japan has a new bit on a hill near the middle of the northern spawn, it’s a little building. (Naturally makes spawn camping easier)
@@henryl531 Gaijin map design never disappoint, like Middle East lower west spawn or the big version of Mozdok northern spawn with a massive killzone from Alpha to Bravo...😬
With soviet style mbt I carry 20 darts and 4 heat. I find it's a balance between not running out of ammo and survivability.
i do belive the 99a and wz1001 have a reload closer to 5 or 6 sec but balance I guess since your not aloud to have good reload and good armor at top tier
I love your play style, it’s just like me! Love to watch it!
The gun is supposed to have atleast -7.5 depression
From my understanding it's an export model, lct meaning Long Cannon Testbed. That camera system on the top is exclusive to China and what it does is when an enemy lazer rangefinds you that camera on top there will turn to the optics that just lazed you and blast a Lazer beam into the camera system. Pure disruption. 😂😂😂 Wish gaijin would model it in.
I wish tanks would use .50s as Coax and 14.5/maybe 20mm as Roof mounted dakka.
Wonder if they will ever add the m1a2t to the Taiwan line, be nice addition especially with other nations getting vehicles from other nations like Sweden getting both t80 and a 2a6
I love the new intro!! Would be even better if you add real footage. A video of the tank or just photos. Would be perfect
the spall damage is ridiculously enormous compared with nato tanks...wonder why
because one is 125mm and the other one is 120mm, the best top tier is sweden
Well, it's either Chinese bias, the fact that the WZ1001 uses a longer gun, or some other factors I'm not aware of
Damn how far you grinded the tree. Most Chinese players never went that far(or like me just got premiums in the sale and grind it when feeling the vibe)
I’ve got all of the ground line and the air line, China is worth the pain
I grinded all of China since there is lot of potential for top tier
China tree is the a small and easy tree to grind
Ive grinded everything for china and its 1000% worth it.
My advice. Stay in 8.7 and grind all the top tier before playing them one at a time. 8.7 China is insanely fun and grinds fast.
lmao just a reminder that those XM-1s still are stuck with shit M735... at 9.3... with missing smoke launchers; and the M1 Abrams still doesnt have M833.
soft kill aps is a powerful laser, when the tank is lased, it shoots at the optic to fuck with any guidance systems, supposedly destroys optics too
Bing Chilling🔥👍🔥👍🔥
Im surprised that it isn't made of Plastic. 🗿🍷
I think the front and wheels looks Russian, side skirts looks like the ones from a Leo, and the rear as you said like an Abrams.
Thanks for the video!
I think the new AbramsX is uping to 130-140mm? Not sure if I remember right but they might
I love China
I'm pretty sure the ztz99a has a 6.5 second relaod irl, same as the t80u and bvm.
There's sufficient videos to suggest this online. The thing is pretty sure China has denied any cooperation with Russia on their auto loader, whereas evidence suggests that Russia either showed them their new auto loader or China stole the designs....
Type99 is a copycat of t-72m that they bought in the Middle East. Since they copied autoloader from it, I'm pretty sure it's not 6.5. And installing a loading mechanism from T-80 would require them to basically redesign the tank and chinese didn't had acces to it early enough to do so, they wouldn't be compatable with all the ammunition from T-90, which it is. T-72 autoloader also can be faster than 7.1, as well as slower based on type of ammunition and it's position in the carousel. So no, it's not the same as mechanism as T-80U or BVM.
@@ГригорийПротченко-н9р The type99 is probably the great great great grandson of the t-54/55 from what i've read. The ztz96 on the other hand is more of a copy of the t-72. Same size, same height similar roadwheels, etc. The type99A has nothing to do with any Russian tanks. It's significantly more advance and incorporate western influence in the mix and it's a uniquely Chinese vehicle.
I remember reading and hearing that that video featuring the so called '6.5' second reload is cut a bit as it does show full reload cycle
@@ГригорийПротченко-н9р its not always called copy its learned from them bruh since they are allys you cant. Say that they are copying
China getting a new top tier, still waiting for my merkava to get its front plate fixed and those 2 rounds behind the engine removed.
You can call it 99A prototype lol
God i want this thing so badly, but i am currently suffering through the Type 59 :(
Hey Justin could you make a video on the USA m1128 wolf pack?
I can understand Gaijin giving it this name if it's a prototype but a more appropriate one would be ZTZ-99(P) or ZTZ-99 Prototype in my opinion.
chinese designation for prototype is wz, somethinglike soviet with their object,but ye in war thunder its a mess
@@whtxdxu7331 "WZ" is a factory designation. It doesn't have anything to do with being a prototype.
@@Malinovyyy ye I did find out days later. but thx for.the a claration
Hey Justin i don't know will you se this, but is there some possibility tu make a videos for all tanks start from low tier for every country. It gets some kind boring watching every chanel showing a battle video for new vehicle. We want to se old tanks again with a new battle sistem. Please. Thank you
Make a 1 hour video of both the ZTZ-99-II and ZTZ-99-III or at least make a video of the ZTZ-99-II
China will grow larger
"fork over $70 for a virtual tank and in return we take that money and put into another game that is gonna crash and burn just as badly as the game your dumping your hard earned money into!"
14.5mg is broken now, got bug report on it already. And there is slightly different turret design for the new one.
Also proxy HE kinda broken, it just does no damage or just HIT, and its 5.3kg of TNT...
And i dont know why chinese didnt place their FY4 or 5 on the sides...
For train transport. The tanks are way to thicck for Chinese railway. Still it’s a poor excuse for no side era, even tho their export tanks have side era and APS systems (vt-4).
Chinese MBTs for domestic use are noticeably less armored than those sent out for export as well
Are you talking about putting it on the hull sides? They probably do have kits for them but since China isn't at war they don't have them installed as they put unnecessary weight if your going to just display it.
@@icy3-1 tbf that can be said about almost all tanks
Can the console use your discount?
Loading time is caused by the Shit balance done by Gaijin.
What is with the engine bay
Can you please test the m1128 wolfpack?
He just made a vid with tech tree one they are same but shells are different
Hey Justin big fan. I'm a fellow streamer on twitch and would like to maybe sometime get some games in with you. I've spent most of my time grinding through the American tree.
6:00 to 7:34 4 kills only 2 players.... Fools, you never go the same rout twice at the start of the match like that and this is why.
The Lego tank
try play the Strela-10, justin, see how "OP" it is compared to dev server. its really trash
13:20 since those rocks got removed people in C can snipe into the upper spawn
Just call it the LCT
Bing Chilling
T80 have 6.5 sec and t72 have 7.1 sec
bing chilling.
T80 actually has 6.5s reload and so is t64. But in game idk.
Jesus its quick is it faster than the 99a?
The ztz99a and wz1001(e) both have the same acceleration and speed
@@jeffrey9068 k
but wz1001 has better turn with 30°/s 20°/s，gaijin dont give that,they just do some copy
@@yuluoxianjun uhh, pretty much gaijin's work as always, copy and paste.
*China's tank division!*
Haha prototype Type 99A with longer gun go brrr. And apparently even has a 14.5mm for its HMG despite sharing the same model as the Russian/Chinese 12.7mm...
Cause it aint a 50 cal :P its a 14.5 mm.
@@Kwisss Huh, must've misread the statcard. Thanks for clarifying :D
Guess that makes it the first top tier tank with a larger caliber HMG
Vroom
Looks like a boring filter tank
一点小小的中国震撼
looks like Gaijin chose WoT way, start creating phantom tanks 😉😉
except that this tank actually existed, unlike your overpowered BZ-176 that makes no sense whatsoever
@@quocvinhnguyen2063 I'm not playing wot, just watching streams sometimes, if this tank existed, it's good to hear that, I'm not historical tank expert, just was curious listening JP, he is called this tank non existent
@@stillans6424 it's kind of, because it's a prototype
WZed1K1 is my unofficial nickkity nack for this thing
PIAAOOYIA
I have a degree in sound engineering if you need help with the mic. :D
The sm7b is a fantastic mic, to fix the percussive mouth sounds, simplest option is a pop filter/mic shield, should sort out the problem, if not you can turn down the gain slightly on your audio interface and increase the volume of the mic post production. 😁 thos are the easiest ways to deal with the issue