Does Gaining Muscle Really BOOST Your Metabolism?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.ย. 2024
- In this video, Milo from Stronger By Science breaks down the research on metabolism and muscle gain. Is working out really a great way to boost your metabolism?
Gain access to 28 FREE Programs:
www.strongerby...
Want us to help you reach your goals?
strongerbyscie...
References:
www.jstage.jst...
www.jstage.jst...
pubmed.ncbi.nl...
pubmed.ncbi.nl...
macrofactorapp...
#metabolism #workout #scienceexplained
"Does Gaining Muscle Really BOOST Your Metabolism?"
This is why I had that 2nd liver implanted.
Bro, I have 3 kidneys 😂
@@DILFDylF space marine detected
You do recommend lenghtened partials for maximum liver growth, don't you?
Im glad brain hypertrophy is minimal, considering it sits in my skull 💀!!
I have had great success with macrofactor and look forward to myoadapt.
This is something i didn't know, thank you
This is interesting, but it would have been more interesting and relevant if they measured the same person as they went from lean or with more fat vs that same person's metabolism with more muscle.
So both increasing muscle and rigourous cardio will enlarge your organs thus leading to increased BMR. People might not know the exact mechanics but saying increasing muscle elevates BMR is not wrong. Or generally, be in better shape increases BMR.
*Macro factor add detected*
So organs grow to adapt to muscle mass or to activity level?
Yes muscle might not be as active as brain cells per kg but you have so much of it it ends up being 23% on the chart. Growing more will obviously increase your BMR, lol
If your BMR was 2500 and you gained 10kg of muscle your new BMR is 2650. Enjoy the extra one slice of bread.
@@jamesgazeley over a week or a month though that's a lot.
@@jamesgazeleyAnd if you keep going over an entire lifting career and gain 20-25kg then you go from 2500 to around 3000. That’s absolutely massive. And before you say that’s impossible, there are PLENTY of natural skinny guys who start off weighing around 140lbs lean and end up weighing 185-190lbs lean after a decade of serious training.
@@jamesgazeley so, per KG of muscle it's roughly 26.5 calories per day, or just over 1 extra calorie per hour? Ya, even the comments below are missing the cost to benefit ratio there.
@@nukesploder it's not really that much
Very interesting! Can’t wait for the podcast episode expanding on this 😁💪
Was not expecting to see some of my favorite sumo rikishi, but a nice surprise.
That was a surprising result. So growing muscle does not largely affect metabolism, but growing organs does!
So if I grow my sex organ I can get lean more quickly? Dr. Milo needs to do a video on how to achieve phallic hypertrophy.
@@382u3uuejhe only goes with science based evidence.....it would be a short episode.
@@382u3uuej It's already made, there are channels and subreddits dedicated to that lol.
Right got it so GH it is then
This is a macro factor commercial
This is what I thought. I’ve been using my Apple Watch to track net energy and it’s been pretty accurate in terms of my weight correlating to net energy intake over time. My BMR creeps up slowly with weight. Obviously having muscle mass comes with a load of health benefits but the most effective way of easily burning calories is to increase NEAT
How about when you move around? You were only talking about bmr, how about the extra calories you burn from walking, cooking, etc. (NEAT)
Great video! Btw where did you get that shirt? I want one! 😅
Do we know if any of the athletes in these studies we are also on PED’s? Where they tested?
What do the values in the Macrofactor BMR represent?
7:54 Where does this equation factor in my FFMI?
Organs growing huh? Thats not what i expected at all lol
So, whats your liver press
@@wallygrandpa 2 bottles of whiskey to failure
**organs** 😼
So basically what you're saying is that i'll never be able to eat pasta again, even if i get jacked......😢
I thought I was on his Chanel haha
How about using growth hormone increases organ size? Although since it was conducted in Japan, there's a higher likelihood of them not using PEDs. But do researchers check for the potential of PEDs in athletes when they are studied? If this is true for basically everyone, I would make a guess that the higher demands on body's processes requires growth of the organs to have a bigger capacity for cycling stuff in and out. But I'll leave it to the smarter people to figure out. I wonder if this is also found in populations like very active jobs or like military people.
WeLl AcTuAlLy 🤓👆 Energy expenditure increase in people that gain muscle is mainly due to people doing the things that lead to gaining muscle e.g. WE GO JYM
Interesting stuff. Thanks for the video. I believe there is an error in what you say at 4:44 - "Athletes that carried 50% more FFM also had hearts, livers and kidneys that were around 50% larger". The trend in the data is linear, but not proportional.
He probably only meant the liver
Ignore me, he's right.
The linear relationships for the liver, kidneys and heart shown here are very close to proportional, because the y-intercepts (e.g. -0.058 for the liver) are so small. They'd be truly proportional if the y-intercepts were zero.
The brain is different because the amount its mass increases by, along with FFM, is a minor contribution to its overall mass - because the y-intercept of 1087 g brain mass is not greatly affected when adding 0.5 g brain mass for every 1 kg FFM.
🤷 I'd best practice more stats
✏️ vs 🐎
Great
By this formula, my BMR is almost 1700cals but I always cut below that (successfully) to around 10-11% bf.
Isn't BMR supposedly the ammount of calories you need to eat just to be healthy? Oh and I forgot to say I'm totally healthy 😅
BMR is the energy you'd use doing nothing (not so much as tapping your foot). My typical exercise is 20-40% of that energy on top of that.
It's fine to diet at a calorie level below your BMR. If you keep doing that until you starve to death, that's a problem, but while you still have fat to lose it's fine.
nah barely, extra muscle mass just sitting by itself will only boost energy needs at rest by almost unnociteable ammounts
Someone give a tl;dr? I'm dumb
Metabolism is very complicated, but building muscle is very good for you :)
Yay! (Jumps up in excitement but smacks head on wall and falls down)
@Nick-kf3io you've been working on those box jumps, huh, buddy? That's awesome height! Let's try saving them for the gym though. 💜
🤣🤣🤣
This didn’t answer the question of resistance training (weight lifting, body weight) vs aerobic training ( running, swimming) for fat loss
So, are the organs growing to adapt to the muscle growth?
Makes sense. also a bigger heart, will produce more power that you need for other activities that are not lifting weights
Why would you ever care about BMR per unit of FFM?
This is like saying if you make 30 bucks an hour there is no point to getting a part time job to make more money because at 15 bucks an hour your per hour rate actually goes down overall...
That doesn't make sense to care about in any context.
Couldn't the larger organs in athletes in these studies be due to steroids?
aww yee
Watch out, this guy's plug-game is tight.
Stay safe, kids.
Cool, so we should stop wasting time growing muscles and focus on just growing our organs instead.
Organ hypertrophy sounds bad for your health 😵💫
Of course it does
being an outlier sucks, probably need a physical lol, your calc says I should have a BMR of 2763, been on an 1800-2000 diet for 6 months, dropped 20 pounds in the first 2 and have leveled off at 245-250lbs (FFM ~80-85) (now 21 pounds behind what I should be by that equation). At 2600-2800 I level off around 270lbs
You may have dropped too low. Consider refeeding at maintenance for a few weeks and then a ~200 calorie deficit. Got me out of a plateau and omg I have energy again!
This video is false. Having more muscle does contribute to more energy expenditure and if that is not accounted for while calculating macros, you eventually enter into deficit thus losing fat.
For the algorithm
This guy is running out of ideas,
Making random videos on random topics.
This makes no sense to me.
Why do you look like you don’t lift in your shirts?
Shirt too large 🤷🏿♂️
Sleeper build
Why does he speak like this? It sounds like he has something in the mouth m
No. Not enough to make a video about. Next subject.
Science says: You should not adjust calories with exercise and therefore should not eat more when you exercise more (since you'll burn less in your body's stress response such as inflammation). Because of this, I don't recommend Macrofactor or other calorie-tracking apps. It is still incredibly healthy (estimated 38% lower mortality rates for long-term physical activity), but not a tool for weight loss or a consideration in the amount of food you eat.
@@Vincent-z3n Adjusting your caloric intake according to your goals and activities is paramount. If you take in 1.800 kcals being totally inactive and overweight, you might need to increase calories if you start seriously exercising. It's about the long-haul steady changes. Crash dieting is just waiting for your body to return to that unhealthy equilibrium.
You are assuming everybody's goal for fitness is weight loss. If your fitness plan is intended for function, you absolutely need to scale calories per activity
"Science" does not say that. You are wrong.
All I can say is my cutting and bulking has become significantly more efficient since using MF. It works extremely well as a tool for weight loss, I literally put in my goal and follow what it says and I've always achieved the goal. What more can you expect from a tool?
You’re just to lazy to count and keep track