Your synopsis of Blade Runner 2049 was simply incorrect. K's questioning of his origins came from his implanted memories, not his dreams. That's an incredibly easy thing to fix. And about the pacing of certain scenes; take K wondering through the wasteland of erotic statues, looking for Deckard; that scene is about thematic poetry and setting atmosphere, so the pacing is deliberate and purposeful.
Also, Jared Leto‘s Character is not the antagonist of Blade Runner 2049, he is an idea, a big darkness luring in the background. (Like the imperator in Star Wars, and no one complained about his lack of scenes in the Og trilogy) The actual antagonist and threat of the movie is his replicant.
I love both movies but I think the original simply has stronger themes and characters. Although the new film has the advantage in the effects and action overall I still prefer the original
John Epperson: I'm curious about what is factually inaccurate in this comparison review. To be fair I didn't enjoy either of these movies, but this review has at least made me think that I might have judged 2049 too harshly when I saw it and that I should possibly give it a second chance. I doubt that I'll ever watch the original Blade Runner again however, it's rather difficult when I'm unable to find any redeeming qualities in the protagonist.
+My face when i see a good pussi Lol I have been in that predicament before. I did like the ending to 2049. I didn't see it coming and it made sense. Thanks for watching buddy!
"Let me and my ADD self make a comparison video about a filmmaking style and pace I absolutely loathe... and not delve into 'spoiler' territory because no one watching this will have seen the first film but still be compelled to watch a comparison piece" I agree with a few of your points about 2049 improving on some things from the Original but your scores are far too low for both. As far as Scifi and the general dystopian futuristic film pantheon these two are the creme de la creme.
a movie feeling long is not necessarily a bad thing. it depends on if it feels long in the way that it loses you in some ways. or just feels longer than it is. if it feels longer than it is then it can be in a positive way. like if your so into the story that you feel every second go by as an amazing experience. thats how i feel with some really great movies. they feel longer because i feel the seconds as powerful and appreciate every second
+Nicolaj Vangsgaard I agree. And that's what I insinuated when I said that I personally found the movie too drag and make my eye lids go heavy. Evidently this film's length was not for me. Thanks for watching buddy!
no problem. i love those versus videos. I agree on most you say and its always nice to experience that. People have a different taste of length and pace. for example some people find the shawshank redemption too slow paced. its very few though since it is considered the greatest movie of all time. and rightfully so. i thought "how good can this really be" before i watched it. then i watched it and it has been my favorite movie since. its the best example for what i said about movies feeling longer because you appreciate every second. the movie is just flawless really. at least in most peoples opinions. including mine. I actually wonder what you think of it? if you have watched it of course
Nicolaj Vangsgaard I actually haven't seen The Shawshank Redemption yet. Another movie that I want to see but haven't is Hacksaw Ridge. They are on my list of films that I have yet to see. So I will get to them eventually but right now I am incredibly busy.
Eric Carter hacksaw ridge is actually the movie that opened my mind for film. And The Shawshank Redemption was the movie that made me see the true magic of movies and helped me learn to analyse film. I strongly recommend both. They are both my favorite films
I have to say that I found Blade Runner 2049 to be some kind of rare masterwork of cinema and one of the all time best sequels ever made. I respect the first movie, but I didn't quite love it. I agree that Blade Runner feels too long. However, despite that 2049 is pretty much 45 minutes longer, it didn't feel as long as the first movie to me. Everything was beautiful to look at, but never did it feel excessive. Some shots linger a tad, but that helped the movie breathe more. I think people that felt this was a problem are helplessly stuck suckling the teat of tired Hollywood conventions. They went to the theater expecting a wall-to-wall action flick with fast editing. I mean, the movie could apologize for being better than that, but why?
When you mentioned Nolan took inspiration from Blade Runner for Gotham, I was reminded that Rutger Hauer, who plays Roy Batty, plays Mr. Earl in Batman Begins. Loved both Blade Runner films, even if the pacing is slow, and they can feel long. Not a whole lot of wonderful things you can talk about without spoiling either one.
I don't know what was said about the films as I only came here for the comments, and though I am a huge fan of the entire Blade Runner franchise inclusive of practically everything, I was so impressed that the recent film covered at length and depicted more fascinating ideas as it had the ability to. I thought as a film and a story with its story flow, this latest film was better made than the original and was much more true to the vision intended by Scott as well, including scenes he created which used to be in the old storyboards as I've studied this franchise extensively. I really thought the film was great, and beat a whole lot of the other neo-noir cyber-noir films. The impressive thing about the first was that it was 1982 and our expectations since then are a lot harsher and people are less easily impressed. This film was lacking iconic visuals and scenes and performances which make the original Blade Runner a classic film and major achievement in film and special effects at the time, but if you watch the original film in its versions the story is not as nicely laid out and straightforward as this one, nor does it really cover quite as many interesting ideas and technologies as this one goes into a bit more. So while watching 2049 I thought "oh this might actually be a better movie as a narrative and film in general" and wondered if anyone dared express that opinion or were just stuck on whichever is older and first without looking at how the way the movie flows and moves is much smoother and clearer in 2049 and the original was pretty jolty and not as good and elaborated.
+Aris Mihail That's interesting. I'll probably check it out and if my opinions have changed enough I might make a quick additional review of the Director's Cut. Thanks for watching and for the recommendation buddy!
well this review explains the saying "horses for courses" the first movie is a masterpiece! the second an excellent sequel, almost on par to the first. I guess maybe it depends on age to a certain degree, I was born in the early eighties. when I eventually saw the first, it warped my mind. Artistic, surreal, futuristic to me lol it was ground-breaking.
+Uniqueness 35 Probably not. I didn't played the first Battlefront purely due to the horrible lack of content. So I don't have time to play both games and then make a video around them. My next versus video which I will begin production on very soon will be Justice League VS The Avengers. Nevertheless thanks for the suggestion buddy and thanks for watching!
Eric Carter I meant talking about which Battlefront 2 is better: The original Battlefront 2 or the new Battlefront 2? Both have campaigns, awesome multiplayer gameplay, good voiceactors, and great graphics(well, for the new Battlefront 2 at least). Apologies for not making it clear.
i feel like these movies really were not meant for you, lot of the things you said were bad in the original movie were its biggest qualities, like the lingering shots that made the atmosphere so dense you could cut it with a knife. the soundtrack of the original is SOOO good because it doesnt sound like any music made regularly today, compared to the 49 one where the music is still good but sounds exactly how you would imagine a neon film music to sound like. the original film is such a masterpiece and i felt really bad listening to you speak so harshly of it.
I don't agree with all your conclusions but I appreciate the analysis. It's a bit weird about where to draw the line between calling something 'bad' vs. it just 'not being your thing', but I guess that's true for anyone doing reviews. I personally like both movies a lot, but again it's a matter of taste. As I think of it, the original BR is kind of like an origin story and 2049 is the second story. Second stories always have an advantage as they can build off the first - but the first story gets credit (or not) for conveying something for the first time. Without going on and on, the main thing I was happy about with 2049 is that is was a really good movie. I was concerned that it would be a lame Hollywood action movie made to look like the first one - but that was not the case.
Story:Blade Runner 2049 Characters:Blade Runner Villains:Blade Runner Visual Efects:Blade Runner 2049 Music:Blade Runner Action:Blade Runner 2049 Its a tie in my opinion but i prefer 2049
Listen to me closely, if you didn't like the movie just fucking say it, instead of just trashing the movie... don't waste your time talking on something you don't like!!! Both movies are a master piece in my opinion, 2049 was a hardcore fan film, not for the average audience!!!
So you don't want me to waste my time talking about something I didn't like, kind of like how you are wasting time talking about my opinion which YOU don't like?
Eric Carter your opinion doesn't bother me, you shut learn how to pic a movie to watch, we all have diferent opinions just deal with it!!! I'm not mad at you, I disagre with you, absolutely!!! Have a good one dude!!!
Live With In Christ's Kingdom 754 mmmmmm!!! I was way over reacting... I don't regret my disagreement, Buy I won't use that kind of lenguage again. We are all cool, I love this movies a lot!!! Had a good one!! 😼😼😼
Jesus Christ whh is every comment here some angry old 40 year old talking about how kids can't say something negative about a movie because we're younger. 2049 is of course the better movie, but the orginal is great as well. This guy is just giving his honest opinions and comparisons on two movies, and he has an unbiased view, unlike the obvious nostalgia and ignorance influencing yours.
Yeah, the original was iconic in many respects including the soundtrack and this 2049 seemed to at least respect it and make references to it but was maybe not bold enough or creative enough to allow itself to really be heard independently. A timid soundtrack afraid to compete with its predecessor.
Great comparison. I love the original, but I think 2049 really is a better film. I also didn't like Neander Wallace. He was just so over the top. However, I feel his hebchwoman Luv is the actual villain of this film (kind of like Darth Vader was the main villain in Empire and not the Emperor) and she was a much more compelling character. Particularly how she would always shed a tear when she was killing someone, clearly showing an inner conflict on some level. The action climax was also one of the most intense scenes I've seen in a while.
I agree with this opinion and yeah Wallace was not seeming very cool or real or anything but over the top and poorly acted in my opinion as compared to what other unique takes could be done with the character, and 2049 as an actual film and narrative motion picture story played out as better than Blade Runner.
What is your ranking of all 2049 Blade Runner movies. I hated Blade Runner 2048, but the new one still wasn’t as good as Blade Runner 2047. My favorite though is Blade Runner 2041, and the worst is Blade Runner 2032.
Great video dude! I personally really like the original Blade Runner but think that 2049 is a masterpiece of modern cinema. We just don’t get movies like it. Denis Villeneuve is truly one of the best directors working today! Would you agree?
I fell asleep 30 minutes into Blade Runner. But that action scene in Blade Runner 2049's opening. But I do agree with you the visual effects. I liked the plot in Blade Runner 2049 but it was told too slow. Rick Decard has a great character ark and Harrison Ford gives an especially amazing performance. Ryan Gosling was amazing but Ford was a bit better. I wanted more Ford but I didn't want more Decard. Roy had a really weird motif that I didn't get it until my second viewing. I also think that Luv was the real villian and we didn't need Leto's Wallace. The world was better handled in Blade Runner 2049 but it was amazing in Blade Runner. The Music in Blade Runner was weird but I appreciated it more after Blade Runner 2049. The action was amazing in both movies. But I was like "What" when Officer K and Sappy broke the wall. Also, K should have died when Luv beat him up, but Blade Runner 2049 was too good when Blade Runner was a bit above average. That's just for me.
These two films are really products of their time. There was no CGi in the first film. You mentioned CGI so your research of the films are a little uninformed. To be fair though, they are not films for everyone and a VS battle overall is kind of a silly exercise. They compliment each other and the reverence for the first is carefully considered in the sequel. Opinions may vary, but some of the concepts might have gone over many people's heads, including those audiences in 1982 who were also seeing E.T. and. The Thing that same summer. Appreciate your effort, but respectfully disagree with most your negative points. It's not an action movie and Deckard is not Han Solo or Indinana Jones. He's a killer. An actual killer of sentient life. Both films can be summed up with "More Human than Human" and it seems like The Matrix is more your flavor. And Blade Runner has been ripped off and borrowed from TO THIS DAY. :D Cheers.
I'm working on it. I am also spending time on Justice League VS The Avengers and then Star Wars The Last Jedi. Trust me, the longer the Ghostbusters video takes, it's only giving me more time to address the HORRIBLE sins of the remake. Thanks for watching and commenting buddy! :D
Thanks. I used to be a fan of Pokemon when I was very little. I am no longer interested however I do have very fond memories of watching it when I was younger.
+Stanislav Kraus Thanks buddy. I actually have done ONE video game comparison. I made a Versus video of Injustice 1 and Injustice 2. Check it out and let me know what you think. ;)
Great analysis. I was sketchy about this film because of the obvious reasons they made a sequel to Blade Runner, but your review encouraged me to go ahead and see it. Thanks, mate.
Geez, the first Blade Runner took place in 2019... Too bad we aren't anywhere near this concept, lol! Then again, we have sci-fi movies that take place in,like 2039, and we may not be anywhere near that
Your synopsis of Blade Runner 2049 was simply incorrect. K's questioning of his origins came from his implanted memories, not his dreams. That's an incredibly easy thing to fix.
And about the pacing of certain scenes; take K wondering through the wasteland of erotic statues, looking for Deckard; that scene is about thematic poetry and setting atmosphere, so the pacing is deliberate and purposeful.
Also, Jared Leto‘s Character is not the antagonist of Blade Runner 2049, he is an idea, a big darkness luring in the background. (Like the imperator in Star Wars, and no one complained about his lack of scenes in the Og trilogy) The actual antagonist and threat of the movie is his replicant.
kids, back in '83, we had a longer attention span.....
Yet 2049 is longer than the original and still maintains a slow pace
I never felt like two and a half hours had gone by. It was really a great movie.
I agree. What do you think most people are saying in the comments though? Have you seen the versions of the original film as well?
I love both movies but I think the original simply has stronger themes and characters. Although the new film has the advantage in the effects and action overall I still prefer the original
W
CGI shots? It was mostly in-camera composition and matte paintings. Digital touch ups came later.
He did say that he was using the "Final Cut" of the original Blade Runner in this review, so I'm sure that there were plenty of digital effects in it.
Although I cringe at your opinions, it's your factual inaccuracies that ruin this video.
John Epperson: I'm curious about what is factually inaccurate in this comparison review. To be fair I didn't enjoy either of these movies, but this review has at least made me think that I might have judged 2049 too harshly when I saw it and that I should possibly give it a second chance. I doubt that I'll ever watch the original Blade Runner again however, it's rather difficult when I'm unable to find any redeeming qualities in the protagonist.
At the end of BL 2049 I WANTED TO PEE SO MUCH BUT I MADE IT TO THE END TO NOT MISS THE ENDING.
+My face when i see a good pussi Lol I have been in that predicament before. I did like the ending to 2049. I didn't see it coming and it made sense. Thanks for watching buddy!
At the end of BR2049 i wanted pee too, and i did it... through my eyes
Good for you I guess
My face when i see a good pussi Try watching Schindler's List.
"Let me and my ADD self make a comparison video about a filmmaking style and pace I absolutely loathe... and not delve into 'spoiler' territory because no one watching this will have seen the first film but still be compelled to watch a comparison piece"
I agree with a few of your points about 2049 improving on some things from the Original but your scores are far too low for both. As far as Scifi and the general dystopian futuristic film pantheon these two are the creme de la creme.
no cgi in the original film.... eh except maybe the final cut added things and enhanced things
If you can't rewatch original Blade Runner multiple times maybe this is not your real calling. Try something else .
VeeZeeRoo That sounds like your nostalgia talking.
a movie feeling long is not necessarily a bad thing. it depends on if it feels long in the way that it loses you in some ways. or just feels longer than it is. if it feels longer than it is then it can be in a positive way. like if your so into the story that you feel every second go by as an amazing experience. thats how i feel with some really great movies. they feel longer because i feel the seconds as powerful and appreciate every second
+Nicolaj Vangsgaard I agree. And that's what I insinuated when I said that I personally found the movie too drag and make my eye lids go heavy. Evidently this film's length was not for me. Thanks for watching buddy!
no problem. i love those versus videos. I agree on most you say and its always nice to experience that. People have a different taste of length and pace. for example some people find the shawshank redemption too slow paced. its very few though since it is considered the greatest movie of all time. and rightfully so. i thought "how good can this really be" before i watched it. then i watched it and it has been my favorite movie since. its the best example for what i said about movies feeling longer because you appreciate every second. the movie is just flawless really. at least in most peoples opinions. including mine. I actually wonder what you think of it? if you have watched it of course
Nicolaj Vangsgaard I actually haven't seen The Shawshank Redemption yet. Another movie that I want to see but haven't is Hacksaw Ridge. They are on my list of films that I have yet to see. So I will get to them eventually but right now I am incredibly busy.
Eric Carter hacksaw ridge is actually the movie that opened my mind for film. And The Shawshank Redemption was the movie that made me see the true magic of movies and helped me learn to analyse film. I strongly recommend both. They are both my favorite films
Sucks that we'll have to wait another 30 years until we can see a third movie.
fr !
I have to say that I found Blade Runner 2049 to be some kind of rare masterwork of cinema and one of the all time best sequels ever made. I respect the first movie, but I didn't quite love it. I agree that Blade Runner feels too long. However, despite that 2049 is pretty much 45 minutes longer, it didn't feel as long as the first movie to me. Everything was beautiful to look at, but never did it feel excessive. Some shots linger a tad, but that helped the movie breathe more. I think people that felt this was a problem are helplessly stuck suckling the teat of tired Hollywood conventions. They went to the theater expecting a wall-to-wall action flick with fast editing. I mean, the movie could apologize for being better than that, but why?
Disagree.
I agree with you. 2049 was really excellent and if examined carefully a truly better film than the original Blade Runner.
When you mentioned Nolan took inspiration from Blade Runner for Gotham, I was reminded that Rutger Hauer, who plays Roy Batty, plays Mr. Earl in Batman Begins. Loved both Blade Runner films, even if the pacing is slow, and they can feel long. Not a whole lot of wonderful things you can talk about without spoiling either one.
Damn, 5/10 For Blade Runner?
I Know It's Your Opinion, But I Think Blade Runner At Least Deserves An 8/10.
Yes nice to see your vids again
You are young, and it shows. Highly disagree with most of your comments.
You are old, and it shows. Highly disagree with most of your comments. (see how easy that was?)
"Age is no guarantee of wisdom"
-Q
Have you ever seen An Inspector Calls? The last generation and ignorant and stubborn, and the new generation can see things in a new modern light.
I miss Sean Young.
I don't know what was said about the films as I only came here for the comments, and though I am a huge fan of the entire Blade Runner franchise inclusive of practically everything, I was so impressed that the recent film covered at length and depicted more fascinating ideas as it had the ability to. I thought as a film and a story with its story flow, this latest film was better made than the original and was much more true to the vision intended by Scott as well, including scenes he created which used to be in the old storyboards as I've studied this franchise extensively. I really thought the film was great, and beat a whole lot of the other neo-noir cyber-noir films. The impressive thing about the first was that it was 1982 and our expectations since then are a lot harsher and people are less easily impressed. This film was lacking iconic visuals and scenes and performances which make the original Blade Runner a classic film and major achievement in film and special effects at the time, but if you watch the original film in its versions the story is not as nicely laid out and straightforward as this one, nor does it really cover quite as many interesting ideas and technologies as this one goes into a bit more. So while watching 2049 I thought "oh this might actually be a better movie as a narrative and film in general" and wondered if anyone dared express that opinion or were just stuck on whichever is older and first without looking at how the way the movie flows and moves is much smoother and clearer in 2049 and the original was pretty jolty and not as good and elaborated.
14:34 Missed opportunity to show a poster of the Last Jedi.😂
I love the visuals of this movie similar to fiflth elelment and i love all 80 90s future films. The music that goes along with it is amaxing.
Wow this is blade runners things in this battle is basically KOTM style.
2049 has a more interesting protagonist and action, but the themes, atmosphere, and antagonists in the original are so much better.
Don't apologise for not making enough videos. If you don't make another one ever again we'll be just fine.
"Visual scenes way too long" ok thats like saying 'I really liked the impact of Guernica but it was way too big" give it up and go count beans....
the directors cut is what u day in th video! it is tight quick(25 minutes shorter) u should try it!!
+Aris Mihail That's interesting. I'll probably check it out and if my opinions have changed enough I might make a quick additional review of the Director's Cut. Thanks for watching and for the recommendation buddy!
I wouldn't watch 2001: A Space Odyssey, if I were you.
well this review explains the saying "horses for courses" the first movie is a masterpiece! the second an excellent sequel, almost on par to the first. I guess maybe it depends on age to a certain degree, I was born in the early eighties. when I eventually saw the first, it warped my mind. Artistic, surreal, futuristic to me lol it was ground-breaking.
Gosh I agree with this video these are the reasons why I say Bladerunner 2049 is better than BladeRunner I love these comparison videos!!!!
It was literally a better film.
You thinking about doing a versus video for Battlefront 2?
+Uniqueness 35 Probably not. I didn't played the first Battlefront purely due to the horrible lack of content. So I don't have time to play both games and then make a video around them. My next versus video which I will begin production on very soon will be Justice League VS The Avengers. Nevertheless thanks for the suggestion buddy and thanks for watching!
Eric Carter I meant talking about which Battlefront 2 is better: The original Battlefront 2 or the new Battlefront 2? Both have campaigns, awesome multiplayer gameplay, good voiceactors, and great graphics(well, for the new Battlefront 2 at least).
Apologies for not making it clear.
PLEASE DO THOR 3 VS THOR 1 OR 2
Sorry buddy. I will be spending my time making Justice League VS The Avengers next so I doubt I will be able to compare both Thor movies.
I never seen this movie before i will check this movie out.
DREAMS?
That's how you know it wasn't just made to milk money out of the franchise.
Blade runner is in 2019 but now it’s 2019
Hey Eric, can you compare Murder on the Orient Express 2017 vs 1974 or 2001
Cult following ? How about good taste is not common and fantastic new vision takes time to grow in general audience.
you must see directors cut
Everyone says that The Final Cut is the best version of the movie. It's also the version that both Ridley Scott and Harrison Ford prefer.
i feel like these movies really were not meant for you, lot of the things you said were bad in the original movie were its biggest qualities, like the lingering shots that made the atmosphere so dense you could cut it with a knife. the soundtrack of the original is SOOO good because it doesnt sound like any music made regularly today, compared to the 49 one where the music is still good but sounds exactly how you would imagine a neon film music to sound like. the original film is such a masterpiece and i felt really bad listening to you speak so harshly of it.
I don't agree with all your conclusions but I appreciate the analysis. It's a bit weird about where to draw the line between calling something 'bad' vs. it just 'not being your thing', but I guess that's true for anyone doing reviews. I personally like both movies a lot, but again it's a matter of taste. As I think of it, the original BR is kind of like an origin story and 2049 is the second story. Second stories always have an advantage as they can build off the first - but the first story gets credit (or not) for conveying something for the first time.
Without going on and on, the main thing I was happy about with 2049 is that is was a really good movie. I was concerned that it would be a lame Hollywood action movie made to look like the first one - but that was not the case.
Which did you think was a better film truly?
Honestly i didn’t notice the runtime before it was over. 2049 is better in the end though
Story:Blade Runner 2049
Characters:Blade Runner
Villains:Blade Runner
Visual Efects:Blade Runner 2049
Music:Blade Runner
Action:Blade Runner 2049
Its a tie in my opinion but i prefer 2049
Good one, yeah 2049 was great. If the films were mixed together then it would be perfect.
Thumbs up.
Thanks Jesse! :D
Listen to me closely, if you didn't like the movie just fucking say it, instead of just trashing the movie... don't waste your time talking on something you don't like!!! Both movies are a master piece in my opinion, 2049 was a hardcore fan film, not for the average audience!!!
So you don't want me to waste my time talking about something I didn't like, kind of like how you are wasting time talking about my opinion which YOU don't like?
Eric Carter your opinion doesn't bother me, you shut learn how to pic a movie to watch, we all have diferent opinions just deal with it!!! I'm not mad at you, I disagre with you, absolutely!!! Have a good one dude!!!
Live With In Christ's Kingdom 754 mmmmmm!!! I was way over reacting... I don't regret my disagreement, Buy I won't use that kind of lenguage again. We are all cool, I love this movies a lot!!! Had a good one!! 😼😼😼
Jesus Christ whh is every comment here some angry old 40 year old talking about how kids can't say something negative about a movie because we're younger. 2049 is of course the better movie, but the orginal is great as well. This guy is just giving his honest opinions and comparisons on two movies, and he has an unbiased view, unlike the obvious nostalgia and ignorance influencing yours.
I agree with everything you said up until you got to the soundtrack I'm sorry but the first movie hands down wins!
Yeah, the original was iconic in many respects including the soundtrack and this 2049 seemed to at least respect it and make references to it but was maybe not bold enough or creative enough to allow itself to really be heard independently. A timid soundtrack afraid to compete with its predecessor.
I agree with this all
Great comparison. I love the original, but I think 2049 really is a better film. I also didn't like Neander Wallace. He was just so over the top. However, I feel his hebchwoman Luv is the actual villain of this film (kind of like Darth Vader was the main villain in Empire and not the Emperor) and she was a much more compelling character. Particularly how she would always shed a tear when she was killing someone, clearly showing an inner conflict on some level. The action climax was also one of the most intense scenes I've seen in a while.
I agree with this opinion and yeah Wallace was not seeming very cool or real or anything but over the top and poorly acted in my opinion as compared to what other unique takes could be done with the character, and 2049 as an actual film and narrative motion picture story played out as better than Blade Runner.
What is your ranking of all 2049 Blade Runner movies. I hated Blade Runner 2048, but the new one still wasn’t as good as Blade Runner 2047. My favorite though is Blade Runner 2041, and the worst is Blade Runner 2032.
I believe Luv is the villain in the new movie tbh.
Luv is the villain working for someone who controls her. She is not independently doing whatever she wants.
Great video dude! I personally really like the original Blade Runner but think that 2049 is a masterpiece of modern cinema. We just don’t get movies like it. Denis Villeneuve is truly one of the best directors working today! Would you agree?
I fell asleep 30 minutes into Blade Runner. But that action scene in Blade Runner 2049's opening. But I do agree with you the visual effects. I liked the plot in Blade Runner 2049 but it was told too slow. Rick Decard has a great character ark and Harrison Ford gives an especially amazing performance. Ryan Gosling was amazing but Ford was a bit better. I wanted more Ford but I didn't want more Decard. Roy had a really weird motif that I didn't get it until my second viewing. I also think that Luv was the real villian and we didn't need Leto's Wallace. The world was better handled in Blade Runner 2049 but it was amazing in Blade Runner. The Music in Blade Runner was weird but I appreciated it more after Blade Runner 2049. The action was amazing in both movies. But I was like "What" when Officer K and Sappy broke the wall. Also, K should have died when Luv beat him up, but Blade Runner 2049 was too good when Blade Runner was a bit above average.
That's just for me.
Well its a good and honest opinion and reaction that doesn't just falsely say things just because something is older ir first.
These two films are really products of their time. There was no CGi in the first film. You mentioned CGI so your research of the films are a little uninformed. To be fair though, they are not films for everyone and a VS battle overall is kind of a silly exercise. They compliment each other and the reverence for the first is carefully considered in the sequel. Opinions may vary, but some of the concepts might have gone over many people's heads, including those audiences in 1982 who were also seeing E.T. and. The Thing that same summer. Appreciate your effort, but respectfully disagree with most your negative points. It's not an action movie and Deckard is not Han Solo or Indinana Jones. He's a killer. An actual killer of sentient life. Both films can be summed up with "More Human than Human" and it seems like The Matrix is more your flavor. And Blade Runner has been ripped off and borrowed from TO THIS DAY. :D Cheers.
so wheres that ghostbusters (1984) to the god awful remake?
I'm working on it. I am also spending time on Justice League VS The Avengers and then Star Wars The Last Jedi. Trust me, the longer the Ghostbusters video takes, it's only giving me more time to address the HORRIBLE sins of the remake. Thanks for watching and commenting buddy! :D
Hello!! :D i also wanna ask great youtuber. Are you a fan of pokemon?
Thanks. I used to be a fan of Pokemon when I was very little. I am no longer interested however I do have very fond memories of watching it when I was younger.
You really dont understand these movies, although i really like that you tried🙌🏻
Will u be doing Avengers vs Age of ultron vs Infinity War when Infinity war comes out?
Why remakes, whyyyyyyy 😢😢😢😢😢...
Great video, I wonder would you ever consider to make video game comparisons?
+Stanislav Kraus Thanks buddy. I actually have done ONE video game comparison. I made a Versus video of Injustice 1 and Injustice 2. Check it out and let me know what you think. ;)
Eric Carter oh I forgot about that one, my bad (I enjoyed it quite a lot)
2049 was so boring
This is a L. The first one was art. 2nd one is I want replicants to have sex so I can save money....
Great analysis. I was sketchy about this film because of the obvious reasons they made a sequel to Blade Runner, but your review encouraged me to go ahead and see it. Thanks, mate.
+Jon D No problem. I hope you enjoy the movie. Thanks for watching buddy!
You serious??!
I can understand why it's taking a month to make ur videos but please do not start taking like 5 months to make each video like what jontron did.
A very thoughtful comparison and contrast
.
+MrHootiedean Thanks buddy. :)
Awesome vid!
+EndGame Thanks buddy!
K is better than Rick Deckard? Ha NO
Well not as a performance, but certainly physically superior.
1982 wins
the new blade runner is stale and unoriginal with the dumb 'joi' story and design
Geez, the first Blade Runner took place in 2019...
Too bad we aren't anywhere near this
concept, lol! Then again, we have sci-fi movies that take place in,like 2039, and we may not be anywhere near that
2nd
69 dislikes😏
Aye yooooo
Sorry these movies aren’t Marvel products