【WarThunder】Sturmtiger vs Soviet Warships(Battleships, cruisers, destroyers, torpedo boats)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 มิ.ย. 2024
  • *Details are explained using the TH-cam subtitle function, so please turn it on and watch.
    Due to the range, the ship side will have an advantage if the distance is increased, so it is a close-range battle.
    Out of curiosity, I tried shooting at various warships, including battlecruisers, light cruisers, destroyers, frigates, and boats.
    00:00 Description
    00:34 vs Soviet torpedo boat Pr.123K (A-11)
    00:54 vs soviet frigate Yenot
    01:32 vs Soviet destroyer Spokoinyy
    02:22 vs Soviet light cruiser Zheleznyakov
    04:29 vs Soviet battlecruiser Kronstadt
    07:31 End
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 433

  • @user-iv7ge9zk4k
    @user-iv7ge9zk4k ปีที่แล้ว +287

    0:26
    動画「今回は4両のシュトゥルムティーガーを用意した」
    紹介直後に3両になって草

  • @user-pd9zk6ee9x
    @user-pd9zk6ee9x ปีที่แล้ว +484

    途中海に落ちてくシュトゥルムかわいい

    • @kusagaming-7823
      @kusagaming-7823 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      可愛さはあっても威力は怖いんだよねw

    • @fazrulaizad3148
      @fazrulaizad3148 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Well, he said he need 4 Sturmtiger so that one Sturmtiger voluntarily threw itself into the sea.

    • @kame_imosuna_dos9272
      @kame_imosuna_dos9272 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      腹筋崩壊

    • @StalinLovsMsmZioglowfagz
      @StalinLovsMsmZioglowfagz ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Apparently the Germans never needed a navy, nor an aircraft carrier like the Graf Zeppelin. Merely Sturmtiger Carriers.

    • @rainharutokaneda945
      @rainharutokaneda945 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      見てて可愛そうって思ったw

  • @hyuga_tamamo
    @hyuga_tamamo ปีที่แล้ว +165

    シュトゥルムティーガーの38cmロケット臼砲は海軍艦艇の対潜水艦用に作ったやつらしいのでむしろ本職なんやろな……

  • @user-lb8ex4yr3p
    @user-lb8ex4yr3p ปีที่แล้ว +17

    5:16辺りの被弾しても何事も無かったかのように煙から出てくるクロンシュタットがイケメンすぎる

  • @fs5119
    @fs5119 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    0:40魚雷艇に対して無慈悲過ぎて笑っちゃった

  • @syuntakun
    @syuntakun 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    6:32 身を挺して友軍を守る図すこすこ

  • @babymagnam
    @babymagnam ปีที่แล้ว +14

    4両用意したって言った瞬間3両になっててわろた

  • @randallwong7196
    @randallwong7196 ปีที่แล้ว +256

    I get a sense that the Sturmtiger's firing accuracy is rated too high, and the ships' is too low.

    • @randallwong7196
      @randallwong7196 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Very few Allied weapons ( or none ) could probably have a chance against a Maus so nerfing the Maus would be necessary to make the game interesting.

    • @jububoobaroo67
      @jububoobaroo67 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@randallwong7196 let's nerf some Russian tanks below real life first and make Chinese transmissions break etc. Let's buff the tiger 1 then, above real life.

    • @tsuaririndoku
      @tsuaririndoku ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Imagine telling Accuracy is too high when the Sturm Tiger literally needs to elevated the main gun to engage at range. Also, this is Warthunder, Gun accuracy is depends on the player to aim.

    • @drytishuuz
      @drytishuuz ปีที่แล้ว

      @user-uk1qz8mb7xcry wehraboo

    • @Yayaloy9
      @Yayaloy9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Joe bruh, you're telling me a battleship would engage a tank at 2km range?? Battleship optimal range is 10-20km, a freaking 16inch maximum range is 24km.

  • @Sera0867
    @Sera0867 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    0:27
    38cm積んでるならワイも戦艦やr((オボボボボボボボボ

  • @peterfett253
    @peterfett253 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    This was cool to watch. Fun matchup. Sturm's rate of fire however was 1 round every 10 min. HE not AP. Provided the ships guns could deppress low enough i'm thinking there woyld be a lot scrap metal on the dock after the first exchange of fire...still and all loved watching this. Good one.

  • @rmh55s74
    @rmh55s74 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    海落ちっていく所可愛い
    助けてもらえたのか気になる

    • @WT_Wolf
      @WT_Wolf  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      残念ながら...(ブクブクブク

  • @user-dx3lb2fn9r
    @user-dx3lb2fn9r ปีที่แล้ว +3

    最初シュトゥルムが海に落ちて行くところで吹いたww

  • @neoneo15556
    @neoneo15556 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    シュトゥルムティガーがぴょこぴょこ動いてるのがかわいい(そこじゃない。

  • @maurizio058
    @maurizio058 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    At that angle of attack on the warship the magazines would have never been hit. Especially by an HE Mortor round. Also, with only 83mm of penetration those rocket Propelled mortor rounds are only doing surface damage except for the pilothouse of most of the ships. Even with plunging fire the rounds are not direction blasts so the rounds would still explode and cause blast damage but not set fires right away. The concussion blast would actually put out fires and move light flammable objects away before they got hot enough to ignite. Shipboard firefighting 101 right there.

    • @liberalsaredegeneratebetasoyl
      @liberalsaredegeneratebetasoyl ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Shh key board warrior

    • @maurizio058
      @maurizio058 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Joe As I never said anything about the Ship's firing at that range. This comment is pointless and shows your lack of reading my comment.

    • @moose6790
      @moose6790 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bro forgot this was a video game

    • @j.kearney484
      @j.kearney484 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @Joe This is half true. The mortar was intended for coastal defense, firing depth charges against submerged submarines, which would not entail the ability to penertate a ship's deck. The rocket projectile was developed explicitly for the Sturmtiger. Even still, I don't think it would be able to reach the magazine of anything larger than a destroyer, ships are just too dense.

    • @user-zs7xk3fe3h
      @user-zs7xk3fe3h ปีที่แล้ว

      The vehicle wasn't intended for use in coastal defense (doubt it could have been used effectively against any type of moving target really). It was intended to be a bunker-buster with the ammunition being capable of penetrating almost 3 meters of reinforced concrete, which is way tougher than the armour of anything other than a battleship.

  • @user-zp3dl3zx4v
    @user-zp3dl3zx4v ปีที่แล้ว +12

    シュトゥルムティーガー4兄弟
    可愛かったです✨

  • @nomad77543
    @nomad77543 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    6:26
    ここは被弾した左端を真ん中が守りに行ってるのかな? なんだかかわいらしいもんだ。

  • @kazutoshisakai7342
    @kazutoshisakai7342 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    とても面白い組み合わせだと思います。大和が沖縄までたどり着けていれば と 考えずにはいられません。

  • @user-zy2eg2sc4j
    @user-zy2eg2sc4j ปีที่แล้ว +49

    シュトゥルムティーガー…強すぎませんか…

  • @Sergeant-Estrek
    @Sergeant-Estrek ปีที่แล้ว +5

    最初1人だけ調子乗って水没していったの可愛いww

  • @user-xu2fp1ho5j
    @user-xu2fp1ho5j ปีที่แล้ว +112

    もともとシュツルムティーガーのロケット自体が対艦用だった希ガス・・・

    • @43kats62
      @43kats62 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      自分の記憶が正しければ、対潜水艦の爆雷投射器だったはず

    • @yn2845
      @yn2845 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      あってるよ
      元々海軍の38cmロケット砲を無理やり虎にくっ付けた戦車

    • @user-fg8dk7yv8r
      @user-fg8dk7yv8r ปีที่แล้ว +30

      正しいです。
      海軍発注の38cm臼砲を陸軍が横取りした→壊れた戦車にくっ付ける案を提出→ヒトラーが興味を示し、直ぐ始める様指示→とりあえず試作機を…となり、製作。同時に量産開始。
      故障したティーガーIを修理して装甲板を付けた自走砲です。
      元々、戦車の射程外から攻撃する自走砲なのに、重装甲で走らない代物。
      装弾数13+1発。映像ではバンバン撃っているが、実際には1発撃ったら、車両員全員(5名)で次弾を装填する必要があります(要ヘルプ員&要クレーン)

    • @user-xu2fp1ho5j
      @user-xu2fp1ho5j ปีที่แล้ว +6

      返信ありがとうございます!つまるところ対艦ロケットってことでいいですよね?

    • @user-fg8dk7yv8r
      @user-fg8dk7yv8r ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@user-xu2fp1ho5j さん
      臼砲は、迫撃砲の口径がデカいモノを指します。
      迫撃砲と臼砲の境目は、厳密に◯cm以上という基準はありません。
      対艦ロケット砲か?と言われると『?』が回答です。
      38cm臼砲とロケット弾の発注は海軍なのは記録から間違い有りません。
      ただ、この時期 制空権も制海権も失っていますし、ドイツ海軍自体まともな艦船が残っていません。
      又、艦船に臼砲+ロケット砲を積んでも余り意味が有りません(射程が海軍としては短い為)
      結果、対艦目的か?と言われると疑問符が付くと思います。
      臼砲自体、トーチカ等 固定された堅固なモノを破壊する(攻撃する)大砲だからです。

  • @ver.YouTube
    @ver.YouTube ปีที่แล้ว +24

    戦車対艦船シリーズの新たな1ページ。
    エンディングの乗り切った感で映画を観てた様でした。

  • @Pete2635
    @Pete2635 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I really enjoyed watching this epic battle! The Sturms were fascinating to observe and their deadly effects on the warships. A lot of fun and wow factor!

  • @m60a3tts1
    @m60a3tts1 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    LOL, A nick from a 5" armor piercing shell and up, would overmatch the sturm armor and open it like a balloon.

  • @FTW..
    @FTW.. ปีที่แล้ว +15

    0:27、1台落っこちたのはなんだ?w

    • @fubuki1115
      @fubuki1115 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      潜水艦になりたかったんだよきっと(テケトー)

  • @The_Cat_Princess
    @The_Cat_Princess ปีที่แล้ว

    ティーガーの挙動がタチコマみたいで可愛かったです、無限リポップで草

  • @stolennimbus
    @stolennimbus ปีที่แล้ว +74

    The main guns on the bigger ships have a much longer range then the range of the Sturmtigers' guns. The ships could have stayed out of range and blow the heck out of the dock and the Sturmtigers without having to worry about being hit.

    • @david55200
      @david55200 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Moreover, a boat shot was so powerful that the air displacement from the shells could blow the entire structure of a boat with just one missed shot."

    • @Edi_J
      @Edi_J 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@stareye3176 Salvo from 9x305mm guns is 9x470kg shot at 900m/s. A hit of such a single projectile leaves crater wider than 10 meters. Those 4 tanks would've just been blown into pieces even by indirect hits. Even medium artillery like 152mm light cruiser guns or 100-152mm Kronshtadt secondaries would be perfectly enough to destroy a tank from mere 200-300 meters at any angle.

    • @joncouncil4454
      @joncouncil4454 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hell I'm sorry, there's no way to build a tank with enough armor to withstand even a light cruiser's 6 inch gun with the velocity those AP shells would have at what's basically in naval terms...point blank range. And to miss shots that freaking close to your target is a sin. And agreed those rocket propelled mortars wouldn't stand a chance against typical armor scheme of every ship here except the torpedo boat and the frigate.The sure don't have the velocity or the ballistics of flight needed that shells have from a rifled gun.

  • @wobblyrick6255
    @wobblyrick6255 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The interesting part is after finally getting the strum mouser I actually wanted to test this theory I would like to see more tests so that is to know the full extent with every battleship

  • @user-qz9xn2km2x
    @user-qz9xn2km2x ปีที่แล้ว +5

    最後の飛び込みは『次はせんすいかんだ!(本来仕様)』かな? ww

  • @user-tq1yn3vp3x
    @user-tq1yn3vp3x ปีที่แล้ว +9

    火力はものすごいし正面装甲もバッチリある。元がティーガーだからすごく遅いわけでもない。これは最強の戦車だ!!
    足回りの故障と装填時間が解決できたらヤバい戦車として後世でもつよつよ戦車として有名になってたんだろうなぁ・・・

  • @Das_Michael
    @Das_Michael ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Наконец-то!
    Мы этого ждали и мы этого дождались!

  • @apophisstr6719
    @apophisstr6719 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You could really sense the enormous firepower a BB tier ship had, imagine actually being the little guy in a battlefield facing such enemies at a close distance...damn.

    • @shawnstanford264
      @shawnstanford264 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Battle Off Samar

    • @apophisstr6719
      @apophisstr6719 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shawnstanford264 The absolute legend of Taffy 3

  • @80fire71
    @80fire71 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    昔読んだ小説に
    駆逐艦とパンターの撃ち合いなんてシーンがあった気がする

  • @user-bd8zj8di7h
    @user-bd8zj8di7h ปีที่แล้ว +9

    『戦車4両を用意…』って言ってる側から海落ちは草

  • @unknown_user27K
    @unknown_user27K ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Смотрел с большим интересом, спасибо за контент!

    • @WT_Wolf
      @WT_Wolf  ปีที่แล้ว

      Спасибо за просмотр!

  • @paulw9516
    @paulw9516 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I also liked it when one drove off the dock and proceeded with underwater operations? 😂😂😂

  • @midgarstrife914
    @midgarstrife914 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The trajectory is the real game changer in here, by plunging it could bypass the thin armoured deck of the ships (some ships) and Stürm has a 38cm rocket.

    • @MartyInLa
      @MartyInLa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Naval guns could score plunging fire hits at distance. Naval architects designed defenses for that like turtleback armor. Some warships definitely had armored decks, British ships dome to mind.

    • @tsuaririndoku
      @tsuaririndoku ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MartyInLa cant say the same thing to Hood sadly

    • @jetuito584
      @jetuito584 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @MartyInLa The turtleback armor scheme was designed for close ranges, which is why the Bismarck proved difficult (but not impossible) to sink. It's a WWI armor scheme.

    • @midgarstrife914
      @midgarstrife914 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tsuaririndoku from what I've read, Hood was considered to be Battlecruiser, so I would assume that since the Bismarck is a full time Battleship it sports a thicker and better armour schemes whereas Hood designed to be 'fast' battleship and had a less thicker armour.

    • @jonnyblayze5149
      @jonnyblayze5149 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jetuito584 nice story, too bad The Bismarck didnt use turtleback armor scheme🤨

  • @gauravdhar5482
    @gauravdhar5482 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing battles against battleships..!! I really enjoyed it..!

    • @WT_Wolf
      @WT_Wolf  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for your nice comment! There was kai who made it. I will continue to post interesting content in the future.

    • @Gromit801
      @Gromit801 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s fictional crap

    • @gauravdhar5482
      @gauravdhar5482 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Gromit801😅🤣🤣

  • @drtidrow
    @drtidrow 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The 6" AP rounds from the light cruiser should have had no trouble punching through the Sturmtiger's armor at that range. The 15" HE shells from the Kronstadt's main guns would have blown the Sturmtigers to pieces, and the 15" AP rounds would be like, "Did I hit something?"

  • @aliciajoseph7821
    @aliciajoseph7821 ปีที่แล้ว

    The fact that the sturmtiger is Built on a tiger chassis makes the best

  • @katsumaru7118
    @katsumaru7118 ปีที่แล้ว

    見ごたえある良い考察でした。
    小動物っぽい挙動がかわいい。
    でもなんで落ちるのよw

    • @WT_Wolf
      @WT_Wolf  ปีที่แล้ว

      ご視聴ありがとうございます!
      皆並ばせようとしたら勢い余って彼は落ちてしまいました...

  • @mjm322
    @mjm322 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautifully shot.

  • @user-su4sc8rn3g
    @user-su4sc8rn3g 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    感動した!フューラーも喜んでおられる!

  • @adanroslan3525
    @adanroslan3525 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The falling Sturmtiger into the ocean was cute

  • @user-ee4hu6lb6s
    @user-ee4hu6lb6s 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ちょこちょこ動くシュトゥルムティーガー可愛いw

  • @user-uh4xz7ii2p
    @user-uh4xz7ii2p ปีที่แล้ว +3

    やはりロケット砲弾·····!! ロケット砲弾は全てを解決する!!

  • @steveperuski5547
    @steveperuski5547 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just subscribed to your channel man, love the videos, great job 👍👍 thank you

    • @WT_Wolf
      @WT_Wolf  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thank you! Comments like that really encourage me to create videos!

  • @user-nm7dt5qr6f
    @user-nm7dt5qr6f ปีที่แล้ว +11

    実際には、駆逐艦がシュトルムティーガーの有効射程まで接近してくれることはない

  • @user-ro6xo2hl5o
    @user-ro6xo2hl5o ปีที่แล้ว

    面白かったです。
    揺れる艦上からの精密射撃など、そうそう命中するものではない、ってとこが強みでしょうか。
    そう考えれば実戦では射撃管制塔や艦橋を狙うのも有効なんでしょうけど、
    それを言ったらこんな距離で艦船と撃ち合うなんてまぁ無いでしょうしw

  • @joelcarson4602
    @joelcarson4602 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Destroyer sits out of range of Sturmtigers and shreds them with withering fire from 6" naval guns.

  • @nu-one2758
    @nu-one2758 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    命中率高すぎぃw

  • @raoulman1
    @raoulman1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glory and Honnor to the Sturmtiger, my second love just after the Maus.

  • @user-yr1wk6kv1s
    @user-yr1wk6kv1s ปีที่แล้ว +2

    海に落っこちそうな個体がかわいい

  • @cliveburt2638
    @cliveburt2638 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The German tank Divisions found out what it was really like to be on the receiving end of 16" (403mm) Battleship guns, 15 Miles (24km) away, during the fight for Northern France in 1944 - HE shells.
    They'd had a taste of it when they fired on RN destroyer in Fall of France in 1940, and they were on y 4" (100mm) guns - but with AP shells.

    • @cliveburt2638
      @cliveburt2638 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Joe The opening shots of WW2 were from their Pre-dreadnought Shlweistig-Holstein, with its 11” guns ….

    • @cliveburt2638
      @cliveburt2638 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Joe September 1939

    • @cliveburt2638
      @cliveburt2638 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Joe Apologist for Hitler?

    • @cliveburt2638
      @cliveburt2638 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Joe Actually documented by the Germans, that it was members "Brandenburg Special Services Unit", that shot at their own border guards to provide the excuse to invade. They tried the same "trick" again when they invaded The Netherlands and Belgium, 7-8 months later.

    • @cliveburt2638
      @cliveburt2638 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Joe Next you will be saying that there were no concentration camps, or death camps .....

  • @McCottygarage
    @McCottygarage ปีที่แล้ว

    0:25からの一台落ちるところが・・なんとも可愛い感じがしました。

  • @user-eh6wx5fh8n
    @user-eh6wx5fh8n ปีที่แล้ว

    すげぇ火力……

  • @Knapweed
    @Knapweed ปีที่แล้ว

    It was a very entertaining video and that, in my opinion, justifies any upload. Good job on putting this together. I doubt, however, the outcome would have been the same in real life. lol

  • @user-zg5lu4se4o
    @user-zg5lu4se4o ปีที่แล้ว +1

    魚雷艇のスピードに照準合うのか?

  • @likedcommentsRdeleted
    @likedcommentsRdeleted ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sturmtigers so badass, they tried to be Uboats at the end of the battle....

  • @HatredOfMephisto
    @HatredOfMephisto ปีที่แล้ว

    lol no commentary just captions and that was freaking entertaining man!

  • @basilmcdonnell9807
    @basilmcdonnell9807 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The secondary armament of most of these ships would likely put out enough fire to go down the barrel of the Sturmtiger and destroy the rocket projectile in the tube before it could be fired. No armor there if a round hits it.

  • @gradewolf5648
    @gradewolf5648 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    わちゃわちゃしてて可愛い笑

  • @AME_kun
    @AME_kun ปีที่แล้ว +2

    0:25
    吹いたw

  • @MySixshot
    @MySixshot ปีที่แล้ว +6

    こういったシミュレートが(厳密なものではないにしても)手軽にできるのは妄想で全てを片付けていた時代では考えられませんね。 それなりの説得力というものが生まれます。
    そして虎ちゃん達がかわいい^ 私は英語とドイツ語ごちゃ読みのストームティーガーという呼び方が好きです^

  • @mpeters220
    @mpeters220 ปีที่แล้ว

    Distant shots with plunging trajectory should score harder hits than close-on horizontal shots.

  • @sixthguardian6914
    @sixthguardian6914 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a sturmtiger in world of tanks, it is still reloading until now!

  • @stokerboiler
    @stokerboiler ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sturmtigers vs sad Russian scows. On Sicily, a single Brooklyn-class CL overwhelmed a platoon of Tiger 1sBrooklyn

  • @bavondale
    @bavondale ปีที่แล้ว

    can you do Sturmpanzer II against ships please?

  • @kintaro724
    @kintaro724 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    BFではお世話になりましたm(_ _)m
    こういうロマン武器大好き

  • @btrswt35
    @btrswt35 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm not trying to pick away at the simulation but I'm guessing as long as the big deck guns could get low enough for a firing solution, those tanks wouldn't stand a chance.

    • @basilmcdonnell9807
      @basilmcdonnell9807 ปีที่แล้ว

      Read an account of battles between Russian tanks and armored trains in Russia; when the bigger guns on the armored train hit a Russian tank there would be no more than dime-sized pieces left.

  • @SirBeast1992
    @SirBeast1992 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I love these videos. Always fun. Even though the frigate would've taken all 4 of those tanks with minimal fuss If this had any sense of realism.

    • @zohaibtariq7351
      @zohaibtariq7351 ปีที่แล้ว

      Frigrate has only HE ammo in game bro and cannon is only 76mm(noth sure about cannon)

  • @scottgalbraith7461
    @scottgalbraith7461 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still think I'd drive around. Seems more manuverable than a frigate.

  • @zerogrey3798
    @zerogrey3798 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The tanks seem to be in god mode, I've seen several hits that would've taken out a modern tank let alone those relics. Not till towards the end of the video when one finally dies to a shell that would've taken out a good shized chunk of city.

  • @seanthompson8071
    @seanthompson8071 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fun video ... the Sturmtigers look like minions. 😆

  • @miguelpaneda1607
    @miguelpaneda1607 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:27 wahahaha.... it converted into a submarine

  • @fenrirgaming37
    @fenrirgaming37 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is so unrealistic. The torpedo boat I could understand, but the rest had guns designed to penetrate naval armor, which was thicker than any tank armor. The Sturmtigers would have been reduced to scrap metal from the frigate and up.

  • @fridayray8891
    @fridayray8891 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lovely combination

  • @vancouver4sure
    @vancouver4sure ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WW2 Canadian Shermans sank 3 German corvettes in Dutch waters. They recovered one of the bells and its in their Officers mess today.

  • @krashd
    @krashd ปีที่แล้ว

    0:25 Four little kittens watching the fifth kitten get it's bath.

  • @kankkunen88
    @kankkunen88 ปีที่แล้ว

    こんな戦車に条件のいい戦いはないわ すぐ吹き飛ばされるレベル

  • @cannonball1978meet
    @cannonball1978meet ปีที่แล้ว +2

    0:26 ここ可愛い

  • @zohaibtariq7351
    @zohaibtariq7351 ปีที่แล้ว

    I enjoyed the video thanks for this amazing content and strumtiger sinking a battle cruiser is alright it is 305mm HE

    • @ekarus4360
      @ekarus4360 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sturmtiger shells are much smaller than the shels of battle ships

  • @kanatan_sika_katan
    @kanatan_sika_katan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    なんだこの可愛い乗り物は…

  • @user-nr5vy1bo8m
    @user-nr5vy1bo8m 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    戦艦を前にアワアワ動いてて可愛い

  • @user-yp4ik5eo3g
    @user-yp4ik5eo3g ปีที่แล้ว

    こんな感じかな⁉️って見てました。48/1のプラモ作らないと🎵

  • @Kan99189
    @Kan99189 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So as a ww2 tank it is very impressive

  • @cruizyfoxx4366
    @cruizyfoxx4366 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your so cool bro awesome bideo!!!!

  • @fantasyunko
    @fantasyunko ปีที่แล้ว +1

    紺碧の艦隊でこんな感じのシーンあったなぁ

  • @jordanwilliams2557
    @jordanwilliams2557 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why didn’t you use ap shells for the destroyers?

  • @Warmaker01
    @Warmaker01 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Yeah, no.
    The ships were woefully inaccurate.
    The Sturmtiger reloads ahistorically quick.
    127mm and 152mm shells would do a lot of bad things to these vehicles. Battleship shells were flipping Tiger tanks in Normandy like a young child throwing a tantrum.
    I can see the Sturmtiger rounds being a threat to Cruisers and smaller ships, but not Battleships. Battleship critical spaces are too well protected to these high explosive shells. They were meant to withstand other Battleships slinging large armor piercing shells at them. Battleship South Dakota at Guadalcanal was taking a pounding from a handful of Japanese Destroyers, Cruisers, and one 356mm armed Battleship, Kirishima. Kirishima was firing 380mm high explosive rounds at South Dakota because Kirishima was on a mission to shell the Henderson Field, and American Battleships showing up was not in the forecast. South Dakota took a lot of hits from 127mm, 203mm, 356mm shells but was never in any danger of sinking.
    So the Battleship being sunk by a handful of high explosive rockets? That's bull. But this is an arcade game, I guess.
    If we want to be real, these ships would be shelling the Sturmtigers from afar.

    • @177SCmaro
      @177SCmaro ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Joe The batteries of AA guns and possibly secondary guns would be more than a match for a handful of armored vehicles. Yes, at that range the main guns would useless on most battleships but in terms of raw power difference let me put it this way, I believe it was Wisconsin who was engaged by 155mm ground based artillery in Korea and responded with a full broadside from her 16in battery, obliterated the artillery and everyone else in the area while receiving no discernable damage and only a few injured crew members.
      Battleships are just on a whole other level of firepower. Even their secondaries are equivalent to most light cruisers.

    • @nobledemon9239
      @nobledemon9239 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Joe cruiser and battleship not same thing 🤣🤣

    • @zohaibtariq7351
      @zohaibtariq7351 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nobledemon9239 Battle cruiser and Battleship not same thing too

    • @zohaibtariq7351
      @zohaibtariq7351 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a battle cruiser not a battleship

    • @jonnyblayze5149
      @jonnyblayze5149 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who told you that stupid s#it? They lied to you. Battleships were not "flipping tigertanks" in normandy kid.

  • @miafillene4396
    @miafillene4396 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hit the sides, and use plunging attacks on the decks to get deep inside the hull

  • @edwardmyers8782
    @edwardmyers8782 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The frigate would have opened up on the sturmtiger well outside of the sturmtigers range and anti aircraft weapons would have gone through the sturm tiger like shit through a goose.

    • @zohaibtariq7351
      @zohaibtariq7351 ปีที่แล้ว

      You know the highest calibre of AA guns is 40mm right?

    • @edwardmyers8782
      @edwardmyers8782 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zohaibtariq7351 you are daft the 5" 38 caliber were dual purpose aa also the 40mm Bofors would have blown right through the be sturm tiger the sturm tigers mortor was a close range weapon I'll suited to firing on moving targets.

  • @tero9323
    @tero9323 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    用意した途端海に落っこちる戦車。

  • @milky55way2012
    @milky55way2012 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Silly since the crew had to leave the tank to fire the massive 380mm. It was designed to sink submarines, but loading was an issue....only about 18 were built.

    • @basilmcdonnell9807
      @basilmcdonnell9807 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And the reload has to be mechanically assisted, from outside the Sturmtiger. How do you do that under a hail of ship gunfire?

  • @calessel3139
    @calessel3139 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Apparently that one SturmTiger thinks it's a submarine!

  • @paulw9516
    @paulw9516 ปีที่แล้ว

    STRUMTIGER Outings are always fun. It's not a true 380 MM battleship round. About half is the rocket 🚀 motor. The other section is for the demo and casing. Very heavy round, and a very cramped fighting compartment would translate into a very slow rate of fire.
    But overall 😮😅

  • @dragonback6075
    @dragonback6075 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hysterically good fun. That's my favorite so far 👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @buckstarchaser2376
    @buckstarchaser2376 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your point is that the silly game mechanics behind images of historical equipment is evident when brought together in absurd scenarios?

  • @JeanLucCaptain
    @JeanLucCaptain ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ya…simply hitting the small gunboat would be next to impossible with such slow moving projectiles. Also Each ship is coming from exactly the same direction and their guns are VERY CLEARLY NERFED.

  • @nap01234
    @nap01234 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    戦艦の主砲や副砲はこんな近距離のしかもあんな小さな目標を狙うようには出来てないと思うので、本来は港の沖から対地攻撃用の主砲弾の雨を降らせるんでしょうね。

  • @Haganeou-1911.
    @Haganeou-1911. ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:28~4両っていってるのに1両減ったwww