I love the honesty of the constant, "here's a reasonable-sounding explanation for something," followed by, "but actually, it turns out not to make sense."
@@tubarao1143 Not really. Some mutations are so specialist that they may thrive until a slight change of it's habitat. Sometimes the mutations are a severe detriment to their species longevity.
@@jordan_roadhouse4798 well, if they have no impact in reproduction they will not be detrimental for individuals. Eg: pale skin in tropics. You will get more chances of melanoma, but when u develop it will be in a non reproductive age. Of course socially it can have impact on ur children, but if talking strictly about spread the genes it has a detrimental effect on individuals survival, but not on the species.
The hummingbird moth is insane. It convergently evolved to look like a hummingbird and fly in a similar way. When I first saw one I had no idea it existed, I thought it was a hummingbird but was horrified to see it had insect legs and antennae.
I remember as kids we also didnt know and thougt it where hummingbirds escaped somewhere. So we spent days trying to Catch them just to finally realize they where infact insects..😂
Sphinx moths are really fun. Several diurnal species and a lot of crepuscular species. In addition to the many species that converge with hummingbirds there are a decent number of bee mimicking species. Some species have really pretty colors. Plus they are wonderful pollinators.
Speaking of metal, when I first saw the thumbnail for this video, I thought it was a huge moth wielding a knight's cavalier lance about to skewer some sort of would-be dino predator.
Their evolution is harder to document since most of them found their niches in the biological tree with plants and fungi long before vertebrates even left the water. So their drastic proto-bug fossils will be a lot older.
I think my favorite part of this video is the laying out this beautiful theory about how butterflies evolved from moths to avoid bats that seemed to fit all the evidence and then was completely thrown out the window when butterflies were found to have existed during the time of the dinosaurs. Science is fun for how it can crush things like that. :)
But even without that evidence, as the video says, it’s dumb to evolve to be active in the daytime to avoid bats, since now you’ve got to deal with birds instead which is just as bad.
Idk if the other theory that butterflies switched to the daytime to drink flower nectar works either. It's not like moths are flying through the night hunting leopards 🤔 Don't they also drink nectar?
Great video, I don’t usually see videos on the evolution of insects expect for the “look how big they were” variety. Would be interested in seeing if the evolution of metamorphosis or even molting is fully understood.
Damn your channel has exploded, I remember when you had 10k subs and 4 patreons. Now you have a giant list, a massive sub account and your videos have only increased in quality. Good job
I thought many butterfly colors where due to meta-material effects, not pigments. In fact, I’m fairly confident no butterfly has blue pigment, but uses the nano-architecture of the scales to display as blue to observers.
Correction: First came the beetles and flies as flower pollinators. Many angiosperms are older than hymenoptera and lepidoptera, like Magoliaceae, Nympheacea and Annonaceae. This leaves Diptera and Coleoptera as most likely original pollinators of the oldest flowering plants. The oldest extant angiosperms are clearly evolved to attract beetles and flies.
Not anymore. The whole crux of the recent discoveries discussed in the video is that Lepidoptera were already around during the earliest Jurassic and were pre-adapted for the evolution of flowers later in the Mesozoic. Additionally, the hymenopteran fossil record now extends into the Late Triassic.
@@Ozraptor4 I haven't disagreed with the evidence in this video, and thought it was great, however a dearth of evidence leaves quite a bit of mystery around what came first, pollinators or flowers, or that they drove one another's evolution. I listened carefully to the video, nothing mentioned suggests that lepidoptera or hymenoptera predate Cleoptera or diptera as pollinators, in fact this matter was not even duacussed. And again, the oldest of flowering forms, are clearly designed for cantharphily, beetle pollination. You can see it if you know flowers well. Look at magnolias, one of the oldest of floweing families for example, no butterfly will land in its bowl shaped flower, and bees rarely visit. If one looks one will find magnolia flowers filled with beetles. Think on the morphology of flowers, bees use flowers that fit their bodies, butterflies too. Butterflies cannot use many flowers, they need something to land on. The kinds of flowers butterflies and bees use were not the oldest flowers, but instead we find the oldest flowering plants attract beetles and flies and are designed to encourage their help in pollination. It does seem, though that it was the diversification of both hymenoptera and lepidoptera that was the impetus behind the later rapid diversification of angiosperms, the beetles never really adapted further in this regard.
The Coleoptera, beetles, were in fact the original pollinators. That’s one of the many reasons that this order is one of the most diverse in the whole animal kingdom, as they evolved along side the angiosperms.
Been binge watching your vids the past week, first video I've seen close after it's been posted. Anyways, love the videos and I think you'll get bigger given that I personally was just recommended your channel out of the blue and hadn't searched for any topic you've covered, so it appears the algorithm favors you!
I was literally wondering about the evolution of butterflies just yesterday, after watching one of your videos, and I'm so glad you answered the call of my curious heart!
first came the bees? My understanding is that the first pollinating animals were beetle-like (koleoptera) and that their flowers of choice were big and edible. Then came the bees, who were able to pollinate without damaging the flower - which was a considerable evolutionary advantage. This is also the reason that among the most "primitive" flowers are the large magnolias.
Isn't it spelled coleoptera.also interesting thing is some beetles actually had the normal front wings back then too,some still do to this day,although they don't use it for flight....
4:50 wait, if butterflies adapeted to take advanagte of flowers as a food source wouldnt they have developed eyes to see colorful flowers first and then started to develop elaborate patterns for sexual display as their eyes became specialized for finding flowers?
As far as I know, the first flowers weren't very colourful, so their eyes didn't need to be all that well adapted in the beginning. The first flower colours were white and yellow, which would have looked bright and clear enough against green leaves. I'm guessing that an accumulation of mutations in eye structure allowed them to see differing colours as flowers also began to evolve and mutate new colours.
Moth Light Media: is referred to the way moths are attracted to light so in essence the content of this channel is the “light” that attracts viewers “moths” and the media portion is just as described. That’s why it’s called Moth Light Media! Or, at least, that’s my interpretation of it.
Take a shot every time he says something like, "It was thought that (feature) evolved because of (x), but as it turns out it was actually discovered much earlier, probably due to (y)."
This was wonderful! I learned a lot of things I never suspected, and they will enrich my experience in watching moths and butterflies from now on. Thank you.
Super cool! I thought one of the reasons Lepidoptera evolved wing scales was because it allows them to escape spider webs- the scales stay stuck to the web while the creature itself is able to fly away.
Dang I thought this was gunna have more of a focus on how a process like metamorphosis could evolve. Seems impossible to imagine how that evolves incrementally
At 0:39, you say the scales “contain coloured pigment”. This is not true. The colour of butterfly and moth wings do derive from the scales, but the scales do not contain any pigments. They instead make use of a phenomenon known as structural colour. Basically, the microstructure of the scales are at the same size as wavelengths of visible light, and the light interacts with the scale microstructure via constructive and destructive interference of the light rays. This causes the vibrant iridescent look on butterfly wings, as the light interacts differently depending on the angle you look at the butterfly. This is also how opals get their colour.
Sorry to disappoint you but you are in the wrong. Butterfly and moth wings do use ordinary pigments like melanin as well as the structural colour of the scales. Citing the source provided by @noconflicts: "The combination of a butterfly's structural and pigmented color can create interesting effects. For example, if you saw a butterfly with yellow pigment underneath a structure that creates a blue iridescent color, you might see a green shade, made by the merging of the two colors. Or depending on your viewpoint, you might see blue, yellow, green or a combination of the three. Your view would change as the butterfly moves its wings and the light enters at different angles."
Doesn't "lepidoptera" mean "scaled wings" rather than "scaled insect?" Binge-watching. Such interesting subjects, well narrated and illustrated. Thanks!
what a great video, I never would have researched any of this on my own, and it's fascinating to think that animals so common were once an intrusive newcomer. I guess you had to do a moth video eventually, considering your channel's name...
Why is it impossible that before the appearance of modern flowers a whole other world of gymnosperm false flowers existed with other types of pollinating insects? After all, many modern gymnosperms have structures equivalent to the flowers and use insects.
you really need to publish this verbatim as a children's picture book with illustrations. maybe watercolor. you already have the audio book ready ! i say this because i use this video to put myself to sleep at least once or twice a week. I've never found a more reliable barbiturate in my entire life. i full suffer from life long insomnia and child me would have loved this. the lofty scholarly jargon should be left in-tact, as well as the broad and vague way contradictions are introduced then brushed aside. a story with almost no conflict of opinion is rare in the paleontology world. and opening your eyes every few seconds just to see b roll of butterflies or moths or bats or birds or flowers? excellent.
The moth at 6:50 looks more stuck in the 70s than in 150,000,000BC. Some very primitive members of the group never lost the Disco I guess. It even has a Mohawk.
Thank you. I support Monarch Butterflies with milkweed in my garden. It’s extraordinary to witness the life cycles of this beautiful Monarch Butterfly.
It still blows my mind completely that animals had been around for millions of years before flowers ever existed.....along with many other plants as well.
Amazing video! I loved it. Your content could be used as really powerful educational resource, specially in this pandemic days were students away from schools.
Channel: *Moth* light media Year of first upload: 2019 *A video actually about moths* Upload year: 2020 A channel with 'moth' in its name waiting a year to upload a video about moths. A touch ironic.
Great video - equally interesting is contemplating how the complete metamorphosis phenomena in insects (which caterpillar/lava to adult process is so sublime and beautiful in butterflies) originally may have arisen in primitive insects.
0:43 the scales don't contain coloured pigment, their colour is actually caused by the interference of light due to the structure of the scale. So, if you crush up blue scales you will not get a blue powder as the structure will be destroyed.
I love the honesty of the constant, "here's a reasonable-sounding explanation for something," followed by, "but actually, it turns out not to make sense."
However!
It is random, but a logical adaptation. The non logical mutations are deleted from the gene pool by natural selection.
tubarao1143 ||| correct :)
@@tubarao1143
Not really. Some mutations are so specialist that they may thrive until a slight change of it's habitat. Sometimes the mutations are a severe detriment to their species longevity.
@@jordan_roadhouse4798 well, if they have no impact in reproduction they will not be detrimental for individuals. Eg: pale skin in tropics. You will get more chances of melanoma, but when u develop it will be in a non reproductive age. Of course socially it can have impact on ur children, but if talking strictly about spread the genes it has a detrimental effect on individuals survival, but not on the species.
8:17. Imagine spending your nights feeding on the sadness of others....
This made me laugh way harder than it should’ve.
r/im14andthisisdeep
Some tears are produced to keep the eye wet but we don't feel these tears
Got yourself the start of an emo song there. Nicely done.
This is hillarious! Those moths are cold hearted😂
The hummingbird moth is insane. It convergently evolved to look like a hummingbird and fly in a similar way. When I first saw one I had no idea it existed, I thought it was a hummingbird but was horrified to see it had insect legs and antennae.
That's terrifying
I remember as kids we also didnt know and thougt it where hummingbirds escaped somewhere. So we spent days trying to Catch them just to finally realize they where infact insects..😂
@@kingpotato7183 No it's not, it's just another variety of animal
Sphinx moths are really fun. Several diurnal species and a lot of crepuscular species. In addition to the many species that converge with hummingbirds there are a decent number of bee mimicking species. Some species have really pretty colors. Plus they are wonderful pollinators.
Likewise. I had no idea they existed until I saw one this year!
Moths have ears? So they can hear me telling them I love them?
Yes! Tell them how much you love them every night. They will appreciate it
Even pigeons have ears
They won’t understand though 😢
I guess they could hear me say I will eat you then I proceeded to eat them.
Ok
Wait so you're telling me there's a moth out there that drinks the tears of its enemies? That's so metal
Mhm.
Your tears are delicious!
Yes. And I believe some butterflies may drink blood
@QWE QWE google says there's some bees that drink sweat and tears
Speaking of metal, when I first saw the thumbnail for this video, I thought it was a huge moth wielding a knight's cavalier lance about to skewer some sort of would-be dino predator.
Birds: Nooo, don't drink my tears ;(
Moths: Haha, proboscis go *succ*
Arthropod evolution needs more love. Vertebrates are cool and all but we need more of our armory bois.
Their evolution is harder to document since most of them found their niches in the biological tree with plants and fungi long before vertebrates even left the water. So their drastic proto-bug fossils will be a lot older.
Mollusks tho?
ikr insects (except for cockroaches ) are pretty interesting creatures armor gang
@@cerridianempire1653 roaches are interesting too tho, especially the ones that aren't house pests
You must love Hollow Knight
I think my favorite part of this video is the laying out this beautiful theory about how butterflies evolved from moths to avoid bats that seemed to fit all the evidence and then was completely thrown out the window when butterflies were found to have existed during the time of the dinosaurs. Science is fun for how it can crush things like that. :)
But even without that evidence, as the video says, it’s dumb to evolve to be active in the daytime to avoid bats, since now you’ve got to deal with birds instead which is just as bad.
Idk if the other theory that butterflies switched to the daytime to drink flower nectar works either. It's not like moths are flying through the night hunting leopards 🤔 Don't they also drink nectar?
Great video, I don’t usually see videos on the evolution of insects expect for the “look how big they were” variety. Would be interested in seeing if the evolution of metamorphosis or even molting is fully understood.
Me too that would be so cool
Precisely.
Lack of fossil means lack of spotlights.
This is related to the evolution of wings in insects, you can search the evolution of flight and the metamophosis plays a big part in it
So how big were they?
jawed moths? that reminded me of mothra in the monsterverse. so mothra was an ancient giant moth after all.
Until flappity-flap went the dracula bat, and that was that.
many kaijus in the monsterverse were based from prehistoric creatures so yeah your right
many kaijus in the monsterverse were based from prehistoric creatures so yeah your right
*Moth* - ra
Somebody called my name
Moths: LAMP
Butterflies: POLEEN
Nectoor 🌹🌸
Let me fix that for you, bröther. LÄMP
@@jasepoag8930 thx brother. How u do that?
@@nigerjohnson8127 I used to know the Mac keyboard combos for them, but I have no idea on PC. I always just google "umlaut a", then copy and paste.
@@jasepoag8930 heh. Know how to do it on mobile?
*Pterosaurs have left the chat*
*Moths:* Haha! We win!
*Bats have joined the chat*
*Birds have Joined the chat*
*Spiders have joined the chat*
*Insert weird mike wazowski here
Moths: Fuck.
Yea the niche will always be filled
I don’t have words for how much I love your content. I personally consider your format to be flawless!
Damn your channel has exploded, I remember when you had 10k subs and 4 patreons. Now you have a giant list, a massive sub account and your videos have only increased in quality. Good job
I thought many butterfly colors where due to meta-material effects, not pigments. In fact, I’m fairly confident no butterfly has blue pigment, but uses the nano-architecture of the scales to display as blue to observers.
There’s actually a single species of butterfly that produces a truly blue pigment
Structural coloration vs pigment coloration
Butterflies: why not both?
@@noodle714 They used their pigment for dying money.
Source: the book and Steve McQueen/Dustin Hoffman movie "Papillon" - which means "butterfly."
There are some butterflies that do (Most famously Morphos, which is a whole genus) but most use pigments
Wait till this guy finds out why pigments are a certain color
None of this is true, moths came to be when the lamp evolved.
Truth.
LAMP
The old philosophical question; what came first, the moth or the lamp?
@Pinoy Doler nice
Lämp
Correction: First came the beetles and flies as flower pollinators. Many angiosperms are older than hymenoptera and lepidoptera, like Magoliaceae, Nympheacea and Annonaceae. This leaves Diptera and Coleoptera as most likely original pollinators of the oldest flowering plants. The oldest extant angiosperms are clearly evolved to attract beetles and flies.
Not anymore. The whole crux of the recent discoveries discussed in the video is that Lepidoptera were already around during the earliest Jurassic and were pre-adapted for the evolution of flowers later in the Mesozoic. Additionally, the hymenopteran fossil record now extends into the Late Triassic.
@@Ozraptor4 I haven't disagreed with the evidence in this video, and thought it was great, however a dearth of evidence leaves quite a bit of mystery around what came first, pollinators or flowers, or that they drove one another's evolution. I listened carefully to the video, nothing mentioned suggests that lepidoptera or hymenoptera predate Cleoptera or diptera as pollinators, in fact this matter was not even duacussed. And again, the oldest of flowering forms, are clearly designed for cantharphily, beetle pollination. You can see it if you know flowers well. Look at magnolias, one of the oldest of floweing families for example, no butterfly will land in its bowl shaped flower, and bees rarely visit. If one looks one will find magnolia flowers filled with beetles. Think on the morphology of flowers, bees use flowers that fit their bodies, butterflies too. Butterflies cannot use many flowers, they need something to land on. The kinds of flowers butterflies and bees use were not the oldest flowers, but instead we find the oldest flowering plants attract beetles and flies and are designed to encourage their help in pollination. It does seem, though that it was the diversification of both hymenoptera and lepidoptera that was the impetus behind the later rapid diversification of angiosperms, the beetles never really adapted further in this regard.
The Coleoptera, beetles, were in fact the original pollinators. That’s one of the many reasons that this order is one of the most diverse in the whole animal kingdom, as they evolved along side the angiosperms.
I create angiosperm everyday
Neat thank you for the learnings
Been binge watching your vids the past week, first video I've seen close after it's been posted. Anyways, love the videos and I think you'll get bigger given that I personally was just recommended your channel out of the blue and hadn't searched for any topic you've covered, so it appears the algorithm favors you!
His speak is just sooo nice! 🥰
Same here with him randomly showing up in my recommended. I'm happy the algorithm favors him. Great channel
I was literally wondering about the evolution of butterflies just yesterday, after watching one of your videos, and I'm so glad you answered the call of my curious heart!
The thumbnail looks straight from those "how aliens would reconstruct the animal" memes.
Can't argue that lol
i really don't find these representation of Anurognathus pterosaur, i think it's the color
first came the bees? My understanding is that the first pollinating animals were beetle-like (koleoptera) and that their flowers of choice were big and edible. Then came the bees, who were able to pollinate without damaging the flower - which was a considerable evolutionary advantage. This is also the reason that among the most "primitive" flowers are the large magnolias.
Isn't it spelled coleoptera.also interesting thing is some beetles actually had the normal front wings back then too,some still do to this day,although they don't use it for flight....
Scaled Wing*
Not scaled insects
Lepidoptera
Just like a pterosaur is a winged lizard. (Even thought it wasnt a lizard.)
Easy mistake to make, I guess, since every insect order is something-ptera
also kinda like how your mother tells you she loves you, when she doesn't
@@jasperzanjani exactly
Jasper Zanjani dude, chill out, it's ok if you don't speak greek, or latin, or science
@@achi-leanathlos8376 all that science you speak won't grow your hair back
Flowers: Exist
Butterflies: It’s free real estate
F
Flower: exists
Mothman: *iT’s fReE rEaL eStAtE*
@@ccriztoff no one asked you
the meme police wants to know your location
Nice to see a moth & butterfly topic, they don't get much notice on insect-related videos
8:19 imagine waking up in the middle of the night and some critter a third your length is sitting on your face drinking your tears.
Im really glad ur channel is getting big I’ve been a fan for awhile so it’s nice to see a TH-camr growing.
Fascinating stuff, well presented. Would love to see some more about evolution of insects and other small invertebrates
"We're amateur lepidopterists."
"You want to see my stamp collection?"
"Only if we were philatelists!"
+100 points for the Venture Brothers reference
Philatery will get you nowhere.
Philatelist? Isn't that generous people?
I actually collect everything i find or catch,mostly insects and fish
4:50 wait, if butterflies adapeted to take advanagte of flowers as a food source wouldnt they have developed eyes to see colorful flowers first and then started to develop elaborate patterns for sexual display as their eyes became specialized for finding flowers?
I would assume they use smell over sight for flower nectar.
@@neptunestreaming4261 In many lepidoptera only the males have a very keen sense smell
As far as I know, the first flowers weren't very colourful, so their eyes didn't need to be all that well adapted in the beginning. The first flower colours were white and yellow, which would have looked bright and clear enough against green leaves.
I'm guessing that an accumulation of mutations in eye structure allowed them to see differing colours as flowers also began to evolve and mutate new colours.
If lepidopterans had ears before bats evolved, it makes me wonder what noises pterosaurs made...
They were terribly rude. Where were their parents?
WRYYYYYY
@@davidegaruti2582 oraoraoraoraoraoraoraoraoraORA!!!
at least we know that their p was silent
@@Gasmaskmax 😳
Your videos are always interesting you do great job congratulations
Moth Light Media: is referred to the way moths are attracted to light so in essence the content of this channel is the “light” that attracts viewers “moths” and the media portion is just as described. That’s why it’s called Moth Light Media! Or, at least, that’s my interpretation of it.
So you're telling me I could potentially scream at a moth and startle it.
Take a shot every time he says something like, "It was thought that (feature) evolved because of (x), but as it turns out it was actually discovered much earlier, probably due to (y)."
Bin here since 2k Buddy, Proud of ur channel growing
This was wonderful! I learned a lot of things I never suspected, and they will enrich my experience in watching moths and butterflies from now on. Thank you.
Me: Moths have ears and a proboscis?
Moths: This is what it sounds like when doves cry.
Being Entomophobic, and still watching this, is a proof of strength
Wooo! Good job! I am impressed with your show of mental strength to watch a video about something you’re terrified of to that extent. Well done.
@@labaccident2010 Thanks, I hope that one day I'll be able to fully get rid of my fear.
But for now, I'm stuck at avoiding those creatures of Hell
@@DAVINNIA314 Maybe someday, but being able to watch a video of them successfully is a massive first step!
@@labaccident2010 I was totally terrified while watching it, but at least I tried
@@DAVINNIA314 Exactly- you tried anyway.
8:04
Moth 1: I use my highly developed mouth tool to drink the tears of my enemies, while they rest beneath the silent moon
Moth 2: hehe animal poo
This channel is better and more informative than anything I ever did at school.....mmmmh, you don’t know what you wanted till you see it.
Super cool! I thought one of the reasons Lepidoptera evolved wing scales was because it allows them to escape spider webs- the scales stay stuck to the web while the creature itself is able to fly away.
I like moths. They are fluffy and cute.
Thank you so much for your work, i really enjoy your content. Keep up the good work my friend
Dang I thought this was gunna have more of a focus on how a process like metamorphosis could evolve. Seems impossible to imagine how that evolves incrementally
Just remember, the magic in evolution is time. An intricate body part such as eyes evolved multiple times? Just add more time, time fixes everything.
At 0:39, you say the scales “contain coloured pigment”. This is not true. The colour of butterfly and moth wings do derive from the scales, but the scales do not contain any pigments. They instead make use of a phenomenon known as structural colour. Basically, the microstructure of the scales are at the same size as wavelengths of visible light, and the light interacts with the scale microstructure via constructive and destructive interference of the light rays. This causes the vibrant iridescent look on butterfly wings, as the light interacts differently depending on the angle you look at the butterfly. This is also how opals get their colour.
Lapis Pyrite isn’t that just that one iridescent blue butterfly? I think other butterflies and moths just have normal pigments.
@@benschwartz2454 nope, all butterflies use structural pigments. Just go out et catch one, gently rub the wings: the scales appear opacue white.
@@eliaskulp306 Nop, Yesterday I caught a moth with orange wings, I touched its wings and my fingers were stained with orange.
Blue butterfly made its blue pigment
Sorry to disappoint you but you are in the wrong. Butterfly and moth wings do use ordinary pigments like melanin as well as the structural colour of the scales. Citing the source provided by @noconflicts: "The combination of a butterfly's structural and pigmented color can create interesting effects. For example, if you saw a butterfly with yellow pigment underneath a structure that creates a blue iridescent color, you might see a green shade, made by the merging of the two colors. Or depending on your viewpoint, you might see blue, yellow, green or a combination of the three. Your view would change as the butterfly moves its wings and the light enters at different angles."
Some of us hate on moths when they're the ancestors of the butterflies everyone loves. Show moths some respect!
good thing i have notifications on
Holy cow I remember when this video first came out and thought the art was so neat. Just came across it again but forgot I watched it. Very nice work.
I love learning about insect evolution plz make more vids like this :3
Your channel name: moth light media
This video: moths.
😏
Congratulations, you can read. Want a medal?
This is some prime content, I had no idea that jawed moths were even a thing
Very good channel.
No bullshit gimmicks, just good, dry information.
Imagine if evolution went a different path so butterflies ended up with mandibles.
Doesn't "lepidoptera" mean "scaled wings" rather than "scaled insect?"
Binge-watching. Such interesting subjects, well narrated and illustrated. Thanks!
what a great video, I never would have researched any of this on my own, and it's fascinating to think that animals so common were once an intrusive newcomer. I guess you had to do a moth video eventually, considering your channel's name...
Why is it impossible that before the appearance of modern flowers a whole other world of gymnosperm false flowers existed with other types of pollinating insects? After all, many modern gymnosperms have structures equivalent to the flowers and use insects.
I read that the cycads might have been pollinated by ancient relatives of scorpionflies
Well considered.
Moth: I only drink the tears of my enemies
As a guy studying biology and hopefully getting a horticulture master's one day.... any vid about pollinators is a must watch
wow days ago i was actually thinking how Butterflies evolve to what they're today, and now i see this ❤️
I can’t stop thinking about that one episode of spongebob where he was freaking out over a butterfly.
The evolution of butterflies!!!! Really!!!! Are you trying to seduce me? Fabulous content, absolutely superb.
if the bug is flying and its not a butterfly or a moth it must die
Fantastic. Not only paleontology but great current species pics and video.
Ooh! ASMR and learning! Your speak is just amazing, it's so soothing! And the graphics - and content - is awesome! Thank you! 😚♥️
you really need to publish this verbatim as a children's picture book with illustrations. maybe watercolor. you already have the audio book ready ! i say this because i use this video to put myself to sleep at least once or twice a week. I've never found a more reliable barbiturate in my entire life. i full suffer from life long insomnia and child me would have loved this. the lofty scholarly jargon should be left in-tact, as well as the broad and vague way contradictions are introduced then brushed aside. a story with almost no conflict of opinion is rare in the paleontology world. and opening your eyes every few seconds just to see b roll of butterflies or moths or bats or birds or flowers? excellent.
I remember when I would catch butterflies and yeet them back into mother nature's hands. It was beautiful TwT.
Thank you for your videos. They are very interesting and I've learned a lot from them.
love your videos man! keep up the good work!
its good to learn about the common things you see in everyday life.
Came for the butterflies, stayed for the tear drinking moths. BRB, got some fossilized memes to bring back.
And now lepidoptera is even more fascinating than I gave them credit for
Moths are cute and fluffy, they have colourful wings, and they love to DRINK THE TEARS OF THEIR ENEMIES
I’m very scared of butterflies and moths, but this video is very interesting!
Angiosperms have been dated at ~175 Million years ago by recent analysis. So they appeared during the Jurassic, not the Cretaceous.
The moth at 6:50 looks more stuck in the 70s than in 150,000,000BC. Some very primitive members of the group never lost the Disco I guess. It even has a Mohawk.
Exactly what I was thinking. Only instead of lamps, they swarmed disco balls.
That video of a butterfly cleaning itself is my new favourite thing
You should have mentioned the hummingbird moth and the hawk moth family. It took me 46 years to see my first hummingbird moth.
Thank you. I support Monarch Butterflies with milkweed in my garden. It’s extraordinary to witness the life cycles of this beautiful Monarch Butterfly.
Thank you so much for focusing on other topics, besides dinosaurs, in Paleo!!!
It still blows my mind completely that animals had been around for millions of years before flowers ever existed.....along with many other plants as well.
Fun Fact: Butterflies were originally called 'Flutter-Bys'
Amazing video! I loved it. Your content could be used as really powerful educational resource, specially in this pandemic days were students away from schools.
06:54 what a 70s disco stylish look *AWESOME* anyone know its name? 🦋
There’s a moth that pries open eyes and drinks the tears of birds as they sleep? Here come the nightmares....
You should do a mantis evolution episode
It's very rare to hear someone in a youtube videoclip pronouncing scientific names correctly. Great video, too!
Thumbnail:
Ancient Rodan VS Legendary Mothra
Channel: *Moth* light media
Year of first upload: 2019
*A video actually about moths*
Upload year: 2020
A channel with 'moth' in its name waiting a year to upload a video about moths. A touch ironic.
Great front cover piece for your channels namesake, and not ironically, quite illuminating on Lepidoptera.
I really like this
most relaxing videos ever
30s in and i've learned something. Subbed
Great video, would love to see another one on insects and there origins
Great video - equally interesting is contemplating how the complete metamorphosis phenomena in insects (which caterpillar/lava to adult process is so sublime and beautiful in butterflies) originally may have arisen in primitive insects.
More insect videos, plz? Maybe the evolution of eusociality, that'd be neat.
Butterfly evolved from moths they are a type of moth that can see during the day light.
Moths predate flowers 🤯
Something about the idea of a moth willfully sprouting ears to spite the hated bats that I enjoy.
Damn! Can you imagine waking up to see a bug drinking your tears while you slept?
Keep ’em comin’! I can't get enough
0:43 the scales don't contain coloured pigment, their colour is actually caused by the interference of light due to the structure of the scale. So, if you crush up blue scales you will not get a blue powder as the structure will be destroyed.