didn't check the calculations, but they seem right. So what? Yes, a plane weighs LESS flying to W And if it flies at 17000 mph above the Equator its weight will be zero, that is, it will be in orbit
You have a force going from 0kg in one direction to nearly 1kg in the other at 45 degrees to you going South, measurable. you don't see or feel it. You have a force on the Boeing 0kg one way to 3860kg at a 45 degree angle, Never accounted for in any flight manual, any place. If the force was directly up , no problem, its at 45/55 degrees to you and the Boeing, would pull the Boeing to one side, The ISS 17000mph is that relative to a fixed point on earth? Yes, What point?
@@KryptonitePhysics didn't you see my video on centrifugal force (2nd part)? The vector sum of gravity AND centrifugal force is always perpendicular to the ground (or sea surface). In fact, it's the sea surface which shapes itself to be perpendicular to this vector sum
@@KryptonitePhysics ISS: 16060 mph (a little less, 'cause it's higher) relative to the point directly under it (if its orbit were in the Equatorial plane, which is not)
@@KryptonitePhysicsWell things weigh less depending on which direction a flight goes. Almost like certain rotational forces actualy lift the objects up slightly more. In other words: your prove for rotation is valid, you just misinterpreted the data.
This is called the Eotvos effect and is a very measurable, repeatable observation. It's why, for instance, almost all orbital launches are to the east.
@@daftwulli6145 All nations launch to the east, with very rare exceptions, and launch sites closer to the equator are favored. If you launch at the equator your first 1,000 mph of orbital velocity is free. If you launch to the west, you have to achieve 2,000 mph of delta vee just to get to where the eastbound rocket started while sitting on the ground. Of course, that's not just accelerating the satellite to 2,000 mph, it's accelerating all the fuel it will need to complete it's climb to orbit and acceleration to orbital velocity. Geosynchronous satellites are all in eastbound orbits. If a low latitude launch site has a big uninhabited area to the east, all the better. Vandenburg, on the west coast, is used for polar orbits, generally launched to the south. At least that's my understanding.
Wow. You just described the eotvos effect. You should really describe it in terms of acceleration, not force. You should also describe how it affects the net force when compared to gravity. So have you actually tested this effect? It has been studied. Even replicated th-cam.com/video/oy0erMiS6xs/w-d-xo.html
"There is a massive difference between going West vs East" - No it's not. You need to do numbers on this to see that these effects are negligent compared to all other forces in play here. You are at a point where you need to do the math buddy.
Right, like for the person it's either 0g/100kg => no centrifugal effect, or sin(45)*0.861kg/100kg => 0.609% difference. Not too many people have calibrated feet that can detect when they suddenly get 0.609% heavier. lol Sure there's a difference, but it takes some pretty sensitive instruments to detect it, not just a 'gut feeling'.
@@KryptonitePhysics Yes, but the point is, as a percentage of the total mass of the objects, the effect is miniscule. As in 'tiny, small, negligible, not easily detectable'. If you get out an accurate enough scale, you CAN measure it. It does exist, therefore the earth IS rotating.
@@KryptonitePhysics Yes, it's easy to work out and the results are STILL just a tiny fraction of the starting mass. What's your POINT??? That you haven't got a scale that can measure to an accuracy of 4 or 5 significant digits? Because if you did, you would measure the exact amount that your 'numbers' predict, and thus confirm we are on a rotating planet. The difference IS there, it is measurable and you're just confirming the rotating earth.
Hey Chris, do you think you could do something similar but at the Equator? Flights from West to East with airplanes having added speed due to the "rotation of the Earth" while planes flying East to West are literally being carried backwards since globers claim the atmosphere spins with Earth while trying to fly West?
Hi yes no problem, working on a few things, 747,at 0 lat, is about the same but 1kg and 48g up nearly. looking at traveling EW then WE. Concord at 0 lat 1.8kg then 30g. Looking at 100kg mass.
The atmosphere doesn't spin with the earth. Only you morons say that. It rotates with the earth. You wanna debunk the globe, but can't even get the stuff about it right 😂😂😂😂
You demonstrated a very real and measurable observation that is proof the earth is rotating and a sphere. So... why do you think the earth is flat again? Your own video tells us it isn't. Was this meant to be proof of a flat earth? Because you inadvertently demonstrated why it isn't. So why make the video? Oh right.. because you know it isn't and are milking this drivel for money and conning morons into giving you their cash. Got it.
Every mass at 45 degrees latitude will have centrifugal force acting on it in a 45 degree direction. Tan Velocity at 45 degrees is 735.6 mph, distance to center, r = 2802 miles. Put your mass in the calculator www.calctool.org/rotational-and-periodic-motion/centrifugal-force
This is true, so if this small acceleration at 45 degrees is real and the 9.8m/s^2 acting towards the centre is correct, what will be the overall change in weight of the object? What kind of bank would the aircraft have to apply to make the floor of the aircraft seem flat? It will turn out that the numbers are very small.
Remember, that the globe supposedly spins on its axis. “If” Grabbity is pulling toward the center of the globe and not from the axis…..then? Kryptonite physics happens!
Well, child, for one it's gravity. Two, gravity vector always points to center of a mass. Three, any proof of a flat earth? We've all been waiting for some, but all flat earthers do is prove a globe. Just like dude here did. So where is this proof of a flat earth? Proof of an ice wall? Proof of any thing yall morons claim? No as usual? Thought so 😂😂😂
Yeah... it's a great way to demonstrate that the earth is a sphere. If you actually understood the physics, he literally just showed you why it has to be. You must have figured out by now that these guys don't actually believe the earth is flat right? They take known physics, misrepresent the data and what it means in a manner that almost seems believable on the surface, but if you actually know what is being discussed, it's not actually the case and they are conning and milking you for your time and money for views. I really hope you figure out that they are manipulating you mate. None of the big names believe the earth is flat. Not Nathan or Mark, none of them. They all think you are an idiot and are using you for profit. I think you have just been misinformed and just don't have the required education regarding physics to actually fully comprehend what's being said, so you accept what they believe. It's not your fault. But it certainly is theirs for lying and manipulating you just so they can pay their bills with your time. I hope you figure it out soon mate. I really do. Don't let these asshats ruin your relationships and waste your life listening to this drivel.
You like to show a bowl of fish in your videos. If you take it in a car and drive down the road at a constant speed, will the fish be pushed against the wall of the bowl? Or is he happily swimming around? Everything in the car moves at the same speed no matter how fast it goes. The only thing that could notice anything in the car is acceleration. But the earth does not. So we do not notice the movement of the earth no matter how fast and in which direction it goes. Think about this again.
WHAT??? Your the only person I've ever seen in known history that thinks the theoretical sphere only rotates. So let me get this straight.. the ground beneath you only rotates? It doesn't **ALSO** rotate around the sun?
@@1957mattes So in your understanding the sun. moon, stars all rotate around a sphere shaped world? Our world is what diameter in your understanding? And our world is 100% stationary?
@@1957mattes Holding someone to their stated claim is being grown up. Maybe you could just state what it is you believe and we'll go from there. Board is erased... go buddy
didn't check the calculations, but they seem right. So what?
Yes, a plane weighs LESS flying to W
And if it flies at 17000 mph above the Equator its weight will be zero, that is, it will be in orbit
You have a force going from 0kg in one direction to nearly 1kg in the other at 45 degrees to you going South, measurable. you don't see or feel it.
You have a force on the Boeing 0kg one way to 3860kg at a 45 degree angle, Never accounted for in any flight manual, any place.
If the force was directly up , no problem, its at 45/55 degrees to you and the Boeing, would pull the Boeing to one side,
The ISS 17000mph is that relative to a fixed point on earth? Yes, What point?
@@KryptonitePhysics didn't you see my video on centrifugal force (2nd part)? The vector sum of gravity AND centrifugal force is always perpendicular to the ground (or sea surface). In fact, it's the sea surface which shapes itself to be perpendicular to this vector sum
@@KryptonitePhysics ISS: 16060 mph (a little less, 'cause it's higher) relative to the point directly under it (if its orbit were in the Equatorial plane, which is not)
@@KryptonitePhysicsWell things weigh less depending on which direction a flight goes. Almost like certain rotational forces actualy lift the objects up slightly more. In other words: your prove for rotation is valid, you just misinterpreted the data.
@@KryptonitePhysicsYawn. Fuel imbalances are allowed to get much higher that the tiny numbers you mention. I don't get your point.
This is called the Eotvos effect and is a very measurable, repeatable observation. It's why, for instance, almost all orbital launches are to the east.
@@daftwulli6145 All nations launch to the east, with very rare exceptions, and launch sites closer to the equator are favored. If you launch at the equator your first 1,000 mph of orbital velocity is free. If you launch to the west, you have to achieve 2,000 mph of delta vee just to get to where the eastbound rocket started while sitting on the ground. Of course, that's not just accelerating the satellite to 2,000 mph, it's accelerating all the fuel it will need to complete it's climb to orbit and acceleration to orbital velocity.
Geosynchronous satellites are all in eastbound orbits. If a low latitude launch site has a big uninhabited area to the east, all the better.
Vandenburg, on the west coast, is used for polar orbits, generally launched to the south. At least that's my understanding.
Wow. You just described the eotvos effect. You should really describe it in terms of acceleration, not force. You should also describe how it affects the net force when compared to gravity.
So have you actually tested this effect? It has been studied. Even replicated
th-cam.com/video/oy0erMiS6xs/w-d-xo.html
Fantastic!
"There is a massive difference between going West vs East" - No it's not. You need to do numbers on this to see that these effects are negligent compared to all other forces in play here. You are at a point where you need to do the math buddy.
Right, like for the person it's either 0g/100kg => no centrifugal effect, or sin(45)*0.861kg/100kg => 0.609% difference. Not too many people have calibrated feet that can detect when they suddenly get 0.609% heavier. lol Sure there's a difference, but it takes some pretty sensitive instruments to detect it, not just a 'gut feeling'.
Check the numbers illustrated they are correct,
@@KryptonitePhysics Yes, but the point is, as a percentage of the total mass of the objects, the effect is miniscule. As in 'tiny, small, negligible, not easily detectable'. If you get out an accurate enough scale, you CAN measure it. It does exist, therefore the earth IS rotating.
@@mikefochtman7164 Check the numbers for 1kg east and west, easy to workout.
@@KryptonitePhysics Yes, it's easy to work out and the results are STILL just a tiny fraction of the starting mass. What's your POINT??? That you haven't got a scale that can measure to an accuracy of 4 or 5 significant digits? Because if you did, you would measure the exact amount that your 'numbers' predict, and thus confirm we are on a rotating planet. The difference IS there, it is measurable and you're just confirming the rotating earth.
Hey Chris, do you think you could do something similar but at the Equator? Flights from West to East with airplanes having added speed due to the "rotation of the Earth" while planes flying East to West are literally being carried backwards since globers claim the atmosphere spins with Earth while trying to fly West?
Hi yes no problem, working on a few things, 747,at 0 lat, is about the same but 1kg and 48g up nearly. looking at traveling EW then WE. Concord at 0 lat 1.8kg then 30g.
Looking at 100kg mass.
The atmosphere doesn't spin with the earth. Only you morons say that. It rotates with the earth. You wanna debunk the globe, but can't even get the stuff about it right 😂😂😂😂
@@KryptonitePhysics yes, please make another video of your “facts”. These are hilarious.
You demonstrated a very real and measurable observation that is proof the earth is rotating and a sphere.
So... why do you think the earth is flat again? Your own video tells us it isn't.
Was this meant to be proof of a flat earth? Because you inadvertently demonstrated why it isn't. So why make the video?
Oh right.. because you know it isn't and are milking this drivel for money and conning morons into giving you their cash. Got it.
God said the earth is stationary so there’s that.🙏
God do not exist, so there's that. Namaste.
@@tomzzzen866 Don't be dumb.
@@Frankyouknow what one of the 3000+ gods are you referring to?.
@@robotsonmars1989 There is only one God.
No, God said it's immovable. I challenge you to move it. 😀 That doesn't mean it's stationary.
Taboo Conspiracy sent my. Subbed! Thank you for your work!
Your username is irony at its finest.
Lmao nice to know you have bottom level iq 😂
Every mass at 45 degrees latitude will have centrifugal force acting on it in a 45 degree direction.
Tan Velocity at 45 degrees is 735.6 mph, distance to center, r = 2802 miles.
Put your mass in the calculator www.calctool.org/rotational-and-periodic-motion/centrifugal-force
This is true, so if this small acceleration at 45 degrees is real and the 9.8m/s^2 acting towards the centre is correct, what will be the overall change in weight of the object? What kind of bank would the aircraft have to apply to make the floor of the aircraft seem flat? It will turn out that the numbers are very small.
Remember, that the globe supposedly spins on its axis. “If” Grabbity is pulling toward the center of the globe and not from the axis…..then? Kryptonite physics happens!
The gravity vector always points to the center of mass. Earth's rotational axis has nothing to do with that.
Well, child, for one it's gravity. Two, gravity vector always points to center of a mass. Three, any proof of a flat earth? We've all been waiting for some, but all flat earthers do is prove a globe. Just like dude here did. So where is this proof of a flat earth? Proof of an ice wall? Proof of any thing yall morons claim? No as usual? Thought so 😂😂😂
These Videos are exactly what you need to send to a interested friend. Pure Science ! Perfect
Only if I wish them to think I am loony tunes.
Yeah... it's a great way to demonstrate that the earth is a sphere. If you actually understood the physics, he literally just showed you why it has to be.
You must have figured out by now that these guys don't actually believe the earth is flat right?
They take known physics, misrepresent the data and what it means in a manner that almost seems believable on the surface, but if you actually know what is being discussed, it's not actually the case and they are conning and milking you for your time and money for views.
I really hope you figure out that they are manipulating you mate. None of the big names believe the earth is flat. Not Nathan or Mark, none of them.
They all think you are an idiot and are using you for profit.
I think you have just been misinformed and just don't have the required education regarding physics to actually fully comprehend what's being said, so you accept what they believe.
It's not your fault. But it certainly is theirs for lying and manipulating you just so they can pay their bills with your time.
I hope you figure it out soon mate. I really do.
Don't let these asshats ruin your relationships and waste your life listening to this drivel.
You like to show a bowl of fish in your videos. If you take it in a car and drive down the road at a constant speed, will the fish be pushed against the wall of the bowl? Or is he happily swimming around? Everything in the car moves at the same speed no matter how fast it goes. The only thing that could notice anything in the car is acceleration. But the earth does not. So we do not notice the movement of the earth no matter how fast and in which direction it goes. Think about this again.
WHAT??? Your the only person I've ever seen in known history that thinks the theoretical sphere only rotates. So let me get this straight.. the ground beneath you only rotates? It doesn't **ALSO** rotate around the sun?
@@wydopnthrtl so????
@@1957mattes So in your understanding the sun. moon, stars all rotate around a sphere shaped world?
Our world is what diameter in your understanding?
And our world is 100% stationary?
@@wydopnthrtl grow up
@@1957mattes Holding someone to their stated claim is being grown up.
Maybe you could just state what it is you believe and we'll go from there.
Board is erased... go buddy