I’m really happy with my 1.7i in a 11’ x 17’ room. My first Maggie were 1.6, then graduated to a pair of 3.6 but found them too over powering for the small room so “downgraded” to the current 1.7i. Incidentally the 1.7i outperformed my other high end bookshelves costing 10 times as much in the same room.
@@albertleung3690 Bass is just adequate so I augment them with a DWM. Maggies present their bass differently from other box type speakers, it “floods” other than “pumps” the room with bass. If set up correctly bass texture from Maggies can be superb. Before changing to 1.7i it is important to know if you can position them correctly, i.e. 6-7 ft from back wall & roughly 0.5 ft from side walls.
@@henrymok8740 thank you for the info. interesting, why do you decided on the DWM vs a power subwoofer. thinking that the sub will give back a bit of punch n may go lower. what province r u in. I m in TO.
@@albertleung3690 DWM’s dipole dispersion characteristic matches better with 1.7i, & is easier to move forward or backward a few inches to compensate the bass level of individual recordings. In small room such as ours it’s more important to get CLEAN rather than deep bass.
First time I listened to Magnapan was after reading the one of the many reviews in the Absolute Sound magazine in the late 1970s early 1980s , back in the day when audio was much simpler and seemingly more fun then it is today. I think Magnapan offers one of the greatest bang for the buck speakers on the market back then and today .
I would also like to say that 1st audition of Magnapan speakers in the very early 1980s I bought them on the spot , I remember how vocal’s were presented so well and that alone sold me . I purchased the 3.? drove them with Threshold Stasis 3 propped the speakers on Mod Squad Tip Toes hooked them up with hideously expensive Mark Levinson speaker wire at $50.00 the pair and when my friends weren’t around out came a mix of golden age 1950 and 60s Jazz and popular music which I still listen too at times ,.Today I still use Magnapan speakers .
@@adrianlow2114 If some of my heavy metal friends back then found out I secretly liked listening to Harry Belefonte , Ella Fitzgerald and the likes I’d be picked on and treated as the odd ball of the group , lol . Today I have much better friends ,,!
interesting...…. I have a similar Maggie story - I was reading a Stereo Review in 1996 after a day of taxes (and during a divorce) when I saw a review of the MMG - it was their entry level speaker at the time, but I was blown away - I'll never go back to push-pull drivers - 19 years later I upgraded to the 1.7i
Get Sublime Acoustic's K231 Active Crossover when introducing a sub into your rig. The best $600 one can spend by far. I've got the 1.7is paired with a REL S/510 and using the K231 as the "frequency traffic cop" the soundstage is magnificent. The rest of my gear is as follows: EverSolo A6 ME for DAC/Streamer thru a Rega Elex acting as my pre and a BAT VK-225 power amp. The K231 sends only 40 HZ and lower to the REL and all other frequencies north of 40 HZ go to the Maggies...which is exactly what they excel at pushing - the blending and balance is superb.
Magnepan 1.7 is really something , they are really something and they have good bass, with a strong amp they perform seamlessly , a performance which is awesome , a must in a audiophile ´s life.
You guys are speaking my language, Magnepan, Hegel, and I love the Kef Ls50 Meta which I just ordered, saving the right Maggie’s for once my 26.5 foot x 15.5 foot x 7 foot theater room is completed. Seems that Hegel might be the best amp to drive both pairs of speakers.
The young man is spot on, great advice. When I listen to my Magnepans I run Bag End Infrasubs 18 inch subs in stereo to augment the last few octaves, fantastic blend, seamless subs with Maggie's! Down to 8htz.
@@carlfuggiasco7495 a great soundtrack is from the movie Titanic where the pipeorgans shudder and shake the room, I didn't even get the effect at the movie theater, didn't know this was in the soundtrack until listening with the Bag End subs! Emerson Lake and Palmers Lucky Man has a Moog bass line that's supremely reproduced, very fast and seamless integration, Wide-screen magazine used them exclusively with Martin Logan speakers for the ability to match the speed of the panels. I have these in my hometheatre which consist of, DNP Supernova Core 2 alr, ambient light rejecting 120 screen, the world's only 7 layer optical screen Epson 4000 4k Mirage OM 6 mains Mirage OMC2 center Mirage OM 10 surrounds Mirage BPS 400 .1 sub 2 18 inch Bag Ends Transparent ultra interconnects Transparent Plus bicable speaker cable Oppo bdp95,pioneer elite 59avi,sony 7000 4k Pioneer elite receiver Conrad Johnson Met I 6 channel tubed pre-amp Technics SL 1200 turntable Bellarri vp129,jolida jd9 Kora Hermes tubed dac 24/192 Plinius SA 102 in front stereo monobloc, pure class A Plinius SA 100 mk3 for surrounds Plinius p8 for center Plinius M8 stereo preamp Then in my latest pure stereo Klipsch Cornwall mk3 103 db sensitivity Transparent reference bicables speaker Dared VP 845 integrated amplifier pure class A tube 18 to 30 watts Innuos Zenith mk3 server Reference audio labs Ethernet rj45 cat 8 silver cryogenic, 2 runs Wireworlds USB platinum starlight silver Lampizator Lite 7 SET dac, with PS Vane 101ds, Sophia electric 2a3s,waiting on a pair of western electric 300bs. Transparent reference XL rca interconnects VPI White Prime Super Scout turntable Transparent reference phono cables Kiseki Purple heart cartridge Herron vtsp mk2 phonostage Thousands of records, cds and DVD, Blu-ray... Lots of fun I have many speakers including Magnepans which demand current, what I like about them is the ability to easily take out or put in, as the folks mentioned, they're portability, along with the transparency, and musicality, however they don't pressurise the room and that's key for me, I like to feel the sound!
As an owner of a pair of Maggie 1.7i, I really enjoyed this in depth analysis! I used to have a Paradigm PDR-10 subwoofer in my system. But I did find that the mismatch with the Maggie’s was too distracting and it was a net negative in my system. So I took it out. As for power I run a pair of Bryston 28B3 monoblocks. So I feel I have enough power and headroom on hand for the 1.7i, because they need power. As for performance, I wish that you commented on the fact that these speakers can be greatly improved at both the top and low ends by adding the MyeStands and the Mike Powell jumper and fuse/silver tube upgrades. They have improved my system in noticeable ways. Of course, Wendell disagrees with all of this. But it is what it is.
I have 3.6 and have matched sub with dsp. Without dsp I was not happy because of mismatch. With dsp (delay and eq) and measurement mic it did make nice match and now I would not play without sub.
It's fun watching/listening to all three of you discussing various audio products and sound - it's sorta like being "a fly on the wall" in a private meeting of guys who know what they are talking about. In terms of Magnepan, I can vouch that they are SOLID, SOUND performers and "phenomenal" (sorry LOL) value! I have had "Maggies" in the past but have Dynaudios (fantastic) now due to space restrictions but I would NOT hesitate to get a pair of Magnepans again. Thanks for the fun "meetings!" I'm know Markam fairly well but live in MTL . . . wish I was closer so that I could drop by! But what with social distancing and all these days, maybe that's not such a bad thing : ) . . . for now.
I sold magneplanars while going to grad school and have had them in numerous applications for over forty years... nice commentary and thoughtful discussion of three very good speakers.
I could not agree with these gentlemen more. Currently running the 1.7 with Bryston 4B3 behind a Tube Preamp. I just played Kiss in Blue and every point he made is spot on. After a year with the 4B3, I have come to the conclusion that nothing needs to be changed. All I do is listen 5-6 hours each evening and am literally lifted up into the music by the Magnepan 1.7. I own a pair of 12 subs but keep them with volume at 0 because they simply are not needed 99% of the time. IMHO so many confuse Forward Bass with good bass and lose the delineation mentioned in this video.
devotee and proud owner of magnepan speakers since 1989 year SMG A, MMG, 1.5QR sub is interesting, but just listen to megi for a short while and enjoy the music because that's all that matters if you want to have a magical sound, buy a magneplanar, connect them with a single ended amplifier and the magic is in the house
This video is so “ORGANIC, NATURAL and positivity, absolutely PHENOMENAL”.... quick question- Would the LRS “fly” in a small room (11 x 12 x 8’) with tubes? PrimaLuna 40w (KT 120’s) I know they want high power/high current Thanks
So I'm moving my room from a 10x14 room to an 11.5x21. Both have 9 foot ceilings. I tried the original 1.7 in the smaller room, but I did not put the trigger. Now so I not only have more room, but I also now have two Vandersteen 2WQ subs with their adjustable Q and novel configuration, that has worked with every speaker I've tried with them with - Vandersteen 3a Signatures to Wharfedale Denton 80/KEF LS-50 to vintage Altec Valencia's. So my original plan, regardless of what people say, is to try them with the subs crossed over fairly low. When I listened to the 1.7 in the smaller room, there was no sub, and at that time I had a McIntoshMC-402. It actually struggled on more dynamic songs. Trying to narrow down the actual room size, which I don't think you did so well. 11.5x21x9. what speaker would you think does best. I'm thinking you would say either .7 or 1.7, but what say you?
@@adrianlow2114 sounds good. I got the first one about 6 years ago and just the one worked really well. Then last November I saw another one for sale for a fabulous price. Couldn't pass it up. They are both the Q models and they do great - never call attention to themselves but when the low bass is there they put it out. I doubt I'll ever get rid of them.
Hi great video guys! I once owned the 1.7 Maggie's and did move on to a dynamic speaker because of moving to a smaller room and that bass slam that was mentioned. Anyway I would like to add that the Maggie dwm bass panel would be a better choice than a sub because it is essentially the bass panel of the 3.7i for that seamless Maggie integration. I would recommend buying 2 of them to keep everything coherent, but at that price if you have the space and extra cash the 3.7i is a much better choice because the true ribbon tweeter is one of the greatest tweeters ever in hifi and a bargain for the price they go for. The 3.7i's larger bass panel might make up the need to add anything for bass for some rooms. On the down side that tweeter is faster than the mid and bass sections so it might be harder to make that speaker "dissapear" so I can see why vilip prefers the 1.7i. Sorry about my run on sentence just wanted to add my 2 cents to the conversation! Thanks! Rob
Robert B, I’ve been told by other Maggie owners and people with Magnepan experience that the only reason to move up to the .7’s or 1.7’s is for larger rooms. That the sound signature is pretty much the same between all 3. Like you said, it’s the 3.7’s where things are dramatically different. And I would love to own the true ribbon speaker but that’s. Little too much for my wallet. But at least I get to enjoy a lot of the Magnepan sound and will enjoy them for what they give me, who’s is beautiful, detailed, airy and transparent music like I’ve never had in my home before. Very enjoyable speaker!
I really love planar magnetic headphones and the ones I've heard don't lack bass at all. I think I'd love any of these loudspeakers, but since I really value deep bass, I'd be one of the people who would always wish for as big a bass panel as I could get, or as big as is needed for the room. I'm not a bass-head. I listen at low levels but still want bass, which often just completely disappears when a system is played at conversational volume levels.
Andy B, As good as the bass is on the LRS’s, they’re completely missing an entire layer of bass that needs to be augmented by a bass panel or fast sub. Period.
Robert B, Yes! I’m sold on the Magnepan sound. I love them! It’s a completely different experience listening to the Maggie’s compared to my ZU’s. It’s nice to have both sounds. I can’t wait to add a sub into the mix with the Maggie’s. It’s going to be the RSL Speedwoofer 10s x 2. It’s that good of a sub. No joke.
aaaah the subwoofer with Maggies....I tend to agree....I happen to have one and tend to back it off......it's there to round off the sound stage. So, Said with big orchestral music a sub with maggies can really work turned up a little......but that's just my ears!
I have 3.6 and have matched sub with dsp. Without dsp I was not happy because of mismatch. With dsp (delay and eq) and measurement mic it did make nice match and now I would not play without sub. I still do not get mid base like dynamic woofer but it helped so much.
always enjoy the discussions. just took a demo on these maggies, hate to disagree, but thought the bass was missing. brought my own music, so knew the tunes, and the bottom was missing. they were played with rogue tube equipment and solid state.
Dang buddy give the kid a brake, he is our future and the best at what he does plus individually super successful.. he carries the whole show for all of you. Respect!!!! Mentor don’t criticism every little thing he says.
Using 1.7i in a 11' x 14' 3-sided room. No need for a sub. Driving them with a pair of Adcom GFA-365 monoblocks. I'm not looking for any new speakers. At least not in my main system.
Just to follow up, I never used a sub with my Maggies when I had them or any other speakers I had, now I must have a sub even with my current floor standers it makes a huge difference in the sound stage and completes the sound top to bottom I highly recommend a sub or even better two if you have the space.
I have some of the earlier 1.7 Maggies. I drive them with SS amps; either ME850 , with 200+ amps @ 4 ohms, or Parasound JC1 monos with much higher output. I find the speakers sound clear in other than the primary room, while obviously being best defined in that room e.g. doing tasks in other rooms.
Great review, I don't own Maggies at this time but I did many years ago still have the original receipt.I don't have the space now but the LRS would fit.My amp would drive them quite well being high current.I don't think the LRS would be better than what I have now just different but I still love the sound of Maggies great speakers paired with a fast sub or two fantastic!
ha! i went and listened to some 1.7i's yesterday and was impressed enough that i'm considering them (or maybe the LRS, my bonus room isn't that big) - but the first demo song played with Kiss and Blue (Hifi Buys, Atlanta)
100% spot on I do own the 1.7i for 2 weeks now and I love them When I add my subs via active crossover something is lost from the overall brilliance of the Maggies. Sadly with some movies you can´t only take the maggies (at certain loudness levels), thats a problem for me. The 1.7i speakers will go into my little nerd cave and I have to figure out if the 20.7 will have the same problem in my home theater living room. I wish they could master even the heaviest scenes from 5.Element or Ready Player One but I´m afraid they can´t, might hold on a bit better as the 1.7i but in the end a sub is needed again. I´m stuck at this point, I don´t want to lose 1% of what the Maggies do with 2-channel music playback, but I would need a solution where I can watch movies without doing much in adding the subs and protecting the Maggies. Maybe a real kickass active crossover and great great subs can handle that so I can injoy both worlds, movies and music without having to switch anything
Another great video - Thanks guys - curious if you guys tried the 1.7i w/ either the PS Audio M700 or M1200 Mono Blocks? I have the M1200 and was considering adding a Maggie to my speaker collection - the folks at PS Audio feel it would be a nice match...what do you think?
I have a huge room: 28' x 24' x 15 ft high. I can place the speakers on the long wall, about 8 ft apart and 3 ft into the room. Still lots of space to both sides and above, so is my room TOO big for the 1.7i? One dealer told me the Maggies would sound tinny + terrible without boundary walls and ceiling to act as a cabinet. Is that true?
Which Mangepan speaker would be better in my man cave/garage which is 22x30 feet. I'd be driving them with an Anthem MCA225 and I listen to classic rock cd's. Is the 1.7 better for me than the .7?
I am considering purchasing either the .7 or the 1.7i as my first panel speaker. My room is 12 by 15 ft and I have a choice of amplifiers to use. Either the Roksan Kandy K2 Integrated and Power are both rated at 200W per channel into 4Ohm. These can be used to Bi-Amp and give 4x 200W. The other choice is the Willsenton R800i which is rated at 50w/ channel but these are tube Watts which in my experience seem to be more powerful than Solid state W.atts. Can anyone give me some idea whether I have the room and gear to make this work and if so, which panel I should audition here in the UK.
Moved, new house and the room i ended up with was 10x14, 7 foot ceilings. Very small, was concerned it would be an issue… not at all. Have a small sealed sub to fill in the bottom for home theater, zero complaints. Going to upgrade my integrated. 10 (plus?) years, not even thinking about swapping out the 1.6s. The soundstage feels like it’s the entire room.
I watch plenty of these folks and the videos they create and sadly they never include an audio sample to go along with their assessment of the product they reviewed. With good microphones it would add to the overall compliment of the product. Just my two cents.
I had a devilof a time integrating subs with Maggie 0.7, I use 2, the crossovers set at 60 hz, and placement took me @ 8 hrs of moving, listening etc. In the end I needed a preamp upgrade to the parasound hint 6, and REW, and digital room correction.
I had trouble with Placement but that was because the room was the wrong room for the speakers it came from a much bigger room had trouble with the equalization because of the size of the room and my old preamp did not have the ability to split off the subwoofers so there’s a lot of bleeding in the mid range from Magis to integrate at all
To integrate with a subwoofer you need a Best sub worker and you need a very very very very controlled crossover network otherwise it’s mirrors the entire bottom register
Are you placing the sub in the right spot then measuring with pink noise? If the sub is of very good calibre with very low distortion, the sub should disappear completely.
Toward the end of the video, Mr. Low mentioned that he likes to listen to these medium Maggies with tubes. Would you be specific as to the which amp you were using, please? I saw an ad from Magnepan not long ago where Wendell Diller and Dave Gordon were listening to the LRSs driven by a pair of Audio Research Reference 160M monoblocks. Talk about a price mismatch: US$650 for the speakers and US$30000 for the amps. Well, when the companies share a history together and are practically neighbors in southeast Minnesota, they can do what they want.
What about an open baffle sub as Magnepan is experimenting with? Are open baffle subs generally "faster" than ported or sealed cabinet subs? I understand that the bipolar nature of open baffles is a more natural match to the bipolar planar design, but does it help with "speed" at all? Obviously the "pure" solution is to add enormous panels of the same design to cover lows down below 40Hz.
The fact you can't add a sub seamlessly integrate with Magnepan the big reason I would want to buy Magnepan that are full range. I try to buy all speakers full range because subs never sound right to me.
Loved the video thank you guys! I just got the 1.7i but my Naim Superuniti (80WPC into 8ohms, 120WPC into 4ohms) goes really hot and stopped playing to cool down. Is H190 a good pair with 1.7i or I have to go with H390? Thanks!
Great Video! Adrian, what are your amplification recommendations that are not Hegel? Oh, I see you said Macintosh MC275 below. Any others to consider? And for the other guys, is the H190 enough, or do you really want to get the H390 for these? There is nothing worse than being disappointed by new speakers because the amp doesn't match. Thanks!
Hey Guys, I watched the video with much interest. I have Focal 1028be, powered by Parasound A21. But I am still wanting more High Fidelity. I listen to stream files via Amazon Music (HD or UltraHD--16-24bit/44-192khz). I reached out to a few regarding the Magnepan 1.7i or B&W 702 S2. But I'm told the Focal's are real good. I'm not totally sold. I want high resolving, and 3D layering. Really trying to get that airy sound. Question: Do you guys think a god preamp with good DAC would make a difference? Right now using my Denon 3808ci to steer for Home Theater. Thanks! Great channel.
I am not an audiophile or audio engineer. I have listened to several of these obviously knowledegable sincere "professionals" comments and recommenditions. There is one noticeable consideration which has never been spoken about either by content creators or viewers like my self. Audiophile commenters span a large age group. Some are as young as their 20's and 30's whilst older ones' are in the 40 to 50 age group and 60 plus years. That is a big age disparity. In my humble opinion it is not physically possible to get accurate accessments of audio output be it live or through audio equipment by anyone over age fifty or consensus between a twenty year old and a forty plus year old. As we age all of our faculties change that is a simple fact unfortunately. Sadly our ability to hear sound diminishes in various frequency ranges. That is just a fact of life. Therefore I would advise customers seeking advise with respect to audio equipment, especially speakers and amplifers to pay closer attention to reviers within the same age bracket as themselves or the principal end user.
unfortunately they cannot be connected in bi wirning unlike 1.5 Qr and 1.6 Qr so it is not known how well they can actually play 1.5 1.6 and 1.7 are actually the same speakers only the year of production is different of course there are some other differences in the turnout and in the cosmetics, but I think they are the same
jon in my opinion there’s actually no question to for 1.7 yellow rice good starter speaker but the 1.7 so we can listen to it first I’m sure I’m sure you will come to this conclusion
But how tall is Jerry?! Why him and not Villip or Jay? LOL. I really hope I find out that Jerry is 210cm tall. Wow those are big panels!!! LOL. Or if Jerry is 150cm, okay - didn't realize the Magnepans were that small.
I have lived with the 1.7’s for two years had to sell them cause they didn’t play nice with all types of music. If you prefer classical and acoustic music. It’s a great chose but for up tempo rock music they really fall short. Your best to have a pair of conventional speakers along with the Maggie’s if your going to listen to let’s say classic rock.
i agree - even though i havent listened to the 1.7s ive auditioned the 20.7 with and without the subwoofer. with the sub imo just sounded more complete will without was still and excellent speaker but was missing a vital element imo.
I listen to lots of classic rock/pop/hip hop/anything on my 1.7's and love it all. Subs help, although I'm just using a tiny pair of REL T5's below 40Hz. Good amplification is key. I'm running some older ARC gear and it works great with the 1.7's. And, as always with Maggies, set up is crucial. It can take a lot of trying before you find the magic geometry for your room.
Yeah the Maggie’s are a very different and special speaker. Which require some TLC in room placement, upstream electronics and music choice. I own the LRS’s and really enjoy them for the magic they make. However if they were my main, everyday speaker, I wouldn’t own them. Like Brystonboy said, they excel at acoustic, vocals, jazz and that type of music. They also sound good with everything else I throw at them. It’s a different way of listening to some of my favorite music. Sound quality, soundstage, imaging, speed and transparency plus sound just coming from thin air is spectacular. Resolution, micro dynamics, details in music are the best I’ve ever heard. And all music sounds good on them. Well at least all well recorded music, poor music sounds poor. They’re very revealing. But as far as huge dynamics and moving air, energizing the room and really moving me the way a live concert goes, especially with certain genres of music. They do fall short to me. I did a lot of listening today with my LRS’s and then switched it up to my system am with my ZU Audio Omen Dirty Weekends and it was like a night and day difference. Used the same songs. And there were definitely songs that I enjoyed on the Maggie’s more, vocals, female vocals but for the most part, I enjoyed everything else on my ZU’s. Especially music with a lot of impact and deep drums bass drums, kick drums bass guitar. Stuff that was meant to hit you in the chest. Music that you feel not just hear. And I’m not talking about noise, or being loud or excessive. But just impact. But I could go wild with that system too. Primus, NIN, even some songs by Madonna, Prince and some jazz musicians sounded more like being at a concert with the ZU’s. Now I am planning on adding two RSL Speedwoofer’s to the Magnepan system and I am sure that will dramatically improve things. It’s simple, the LRS panels just can’t move the kind of air the 10inch drivers in the ZU’s can. There is 0 impact or startling dynamics with the Maggie’s like there is with the ZU’s.
@@jeffadams9699 this is why i didnt purchase the 20.7 as i listen to various genres of music depending on my mood. i dont want to limit muself on certain type of music.
@@jeffadams9699 have you tried any of the after market stands for the LRS? Also, would they be better vertical and or raised up off the floor 4 to 12 inches?
@@adrianlow2114 ty. I had a mojo and the internal dac to my rotel integrate. The rotel is normal chip sound, dynamic and spits details out with a large soundstage great for giving that surreal soundstage. But my mojo is more coherent. Prefer the integrated dac for electronic and mojo for "audiophile" have to toe the speakers in directly for mojo though and hardly any toe in for the integrated
I believe one of the gentlemen said the 1.7i has a woofer, a midrange driver and a tweeter. Pretty sure it's a mid/woofer driver, a tweeter and a supertweeter.
The SMGas also benefited from vertical feet My 0.7 are on verticals stands that I made, the plexiglass stand Magnapan make is horrible, it’s ugly, and unstable.
Yes. I put my SMGa’s on air conditioner brackets screwed into wood. The MMG’s are on wood that I angled so that they are straight up. I won’t go back without anchors.
@@adrianlow2114 he was being a dick in the video at the beginning. He then said he had more to contribute that wasn't a reiteration of the lrs and .7 reviews. Just my opinion.
@@adrianlow2114 I have a brother. I know what it's like to have a brother. That said, Vilip still just tries to one up Jay with reiterated bs. Honestly it dragged the entire review down. And like Jay pointed out, he didnt get into all those details because it's basically the same as the lower models.....and hes right. All Vilip did was claim he had more to contribute and then in the end he didnt. Lol. It's cool though. I get it, you are gonna defend your boy....especially on social media. I dont blame you. Good reviews minus this one and its only diminished because of the almighty Vilip.
I couldn't disagree more with the Villip bashing. I think these three really all compliment each other very well. I appreciate what each of them bring to the discussion and I especially like the dynamic between Jay and Villip. someone mentioned brotherly and I can totally see that and I can also sense a real mutual respect between them mixed in with good hearted ribbing.
Your channel is honest and respectful, for that I thank-you.
Vilip = Phenomenal,
Adrian = Natural,
Jay = Organic.
Another great vid, thank you
I’m really happy with my 1.7i in a 11’ x 17’ room. My first Maggie were 1.6, then graduated to a pair of 3.6 but found them too over powering for the small room so “downgraded” to the current 1.7i. Incidentally the 1.7i outperformed my other high end bookshelves costing 10 times as much in the same room.
How is the bass? I am using Verity Renzi for over 12 yrs now thinking of changing to something different. my room is almost the same 10.5 x 16.5.
@@albertleung3690 Bass is just adequate so I augment them with a DWM. Maggies present their bass differently from other box type speakers, it “floods” other than “pumps” the room with bass. If set up correctly bass texture from Maggies can be superb. Before changing to 1.7i it is important to know if you can position them correctly, i.e. 6-7 ft from back wall & roughly 0.5 ft from side walls.
@@henrymok8740 thank you for the info. interesting, why do you decided on the DWM vs a power subwoofer. thinking that the sub will give back a bit of punch n may go lower. what province r u in. I m in TO.
@@albertleung3690 DWM’s dipole dispersion characteristic matches better with 1.7i, & is easier to move forward or backward a few inches to compensate the bass level of individual recordings. In small room such as ours it’s more important to get CLEAN rather than deep bass.
@@henrymok8740 thanks for the advice
First time I listened to Magnapan was after reading the one of the many reviews in the Absolute Sound magazine in the late 1970s early 1980s , back in the day when audio was much simpler and seemingly more fun then it is today.
I think Magnapan offers one of the greatest bang for the buck speakers on the market back then and today .
I would also like to say that 1st audition of Magnapan speakers in the very early 1980s I bought them on the spot , I remember how vocal’s were presented so well and that alone sold me .
I purchased the 3.? drove them with Threshold Stasis 3 propped the speakers on Mod Squad Tip Toes hooked them up with hideously expensive Mark Levinson speaker wire at $50.00 the pair and when my friends weren’t around out came a mix of golden age 1950 and 60s Jazz and popular music which I still listen too at times ,.Today I still use Magnapan speakers .
@@adrianlow2114 If some of my heavy metal friends back then found out I secretly liked listening to Harry Belefonte , Ella Fitzgerald and the likes I’d be picked on and treated as the odd ball of the group , lol . Today I have much better friends ,,!
interesting...…. I have a similar Maggie story - I was reading a Stereo Review in 1996 after a day of taxes (and during a divorce) when I saw a review of the MMG - it was their entry level speaker at the time, but I was blown away - I'll never go back to push-pull drivers - 19 years later I upgraded to the 1.7i
of course what you save on the speakers you'll spend on amplification
Get Sublime Acoustic's K231 Active Crossover when introducing a sub into your rig. The best $600 one can spend by far. I've got the 1.7is paired with a REL S/510 and using the K231 as the "frequency traffic cop" the soundstage is magnificent. The rest of my gear is as follows: EverSolo A6 ME for DAC/Streamer thru a Rega Elex acting as my pre and a BAT VK-225 power amp. The K231 sends only 40 HZ and lower to the REL and all other frequencies north of 40 HZ go to the Maggies...which is exactly what they excel at pushing - the blending and balance is superb.
Magnepan 1.7 is really something , they are really something and they have good bass, with a strong amp they perform seamlessly , a performance which is awesome , a must in a audiophile ´s life.
Thank you all for your channel and reviews, they are honest and comprehensive! Helps out a plenty in making choices in audio
I love my REL subs with my LRS speakers. They are filtered at 100 Hz to alleviate the panel at louder volumes..
You guys are speaking my language, Magnepan, Hegel, and I love the Kef Ls50 Meta which I just ordered, saving the right Maggie’s for once my 26.5 foot x 15.5 foot x 7 foot theater room is completed. Seems that Hegel might be the best amp to drive both pairs of speakers.
The young man is spot on, great advice.
When I listen to my Magnepans I run Bag End Infrasubs 18 inch subs in stereo to augment the last few octaves, fantastic blend, seamless subs with Maggie's!
Down to 8htz.
But can you hear 8 htz.....that is the absolute bottom of my hearing....after that nothing.....
@@carlfuggiasco7495 a great soundtrack is from the movie Titanic where the pipeorgans shudder and shake the room, I didn't even get the effect at the movie theater, didn't know this was in the soundtrack until listening with the Bag End subs!
Emerson Lake and Palmers Lucky Man has a Moog bass line that's supremely reproduced, very fast and seamless integration, Wide-screen magazine used them exclusively with Martin Logan speakers for the ability to match the speed of the panels.
I have these in my hometheatre which consist of,
DNP Supernova Core 2 alr, ambient light rejecting 120 screen, the world's only 7 layer optical screen
Epson 4000 4k
Mirage OM 6 mains
Mirage OMC2 center
Mirage OM 10 surrounds
Mirage BPS 400 .1 sub
2 18 inch Bag Ends
Transparent ultra interconnects
Transparent Plus bicable speaker cable
Oppo bdp95,pioneer elite 59avi,sony 7000 4k
Pioneer elite receiver
Conrad Johnson Met I 6 channel tubed pre-amp
Technics SL 1200 turntable
Bellarri vp129,jolida jd9
Kora Hermes tubed dac 24/192
Plinius SA 102 in front stereo monobloc, pure class A
Plinius SA 100 mk3 for surrounds
Plinius p8 for center
Plinius M8 stereo preamp
Then in my latest pure stereo
Klipsch Cornwall mk3 103 db sensitivity
Transparent reference bicables speaker
Dared VP 845 integrated amplifier pure class A tube 18 to 30 watts
Innuos Zenith mk3 server
Reference audio labs Ethernet rj45 cat 8 silver cryogenic, 2 runs
Wireworlds USB platinum starlight silver
Lampizator Lite 7 SET dac, with PS Vane 101ds, Sophia electric 2a3s,waiting on a pair of western electric 300bs.
Transparent reference XL rca interconnects
VPI White Prime Super Scout turntable
Transparent reference phono cables
Kiseki Purple heart cartridge
Herron vtsp mk2 phonostage
Thousands of records, cds and DVD, Blu-ray... Lots of fun
I have many speakers including Magnepans which demand current, what I like about them is the ability to easily take out or put in, as the folks mentioned, they're portability, along with the transparency, and musicality, however they don't pressurise the room and that's key for me, I like to feel the sound!
8 hz.,really?
As an owner of a pair of Maggie 1.7i, I really enjoyed this in depth analysis! I used to have a Paradigm PDR-10 subwoofer in my system. But I did find that the mismatch with the Maggie’s was too distracting and it was a net negative in my system. So I took it out. As for power I run a pair of Bryston 28B3 monoblocks. So I feel I have enough power and headroom on hand for the 1.7i, because they need power. As for performance, I wish that you commented on the fact that these speakers can be greatly improved at both the top and low ends by adding the MyeStands and the Mike Powell jumper and fuse/silver tube upgrades. They have improved my system in noticeable ways. Of course, Wendell disagrees with all of this. But it is what it is.
I have 3.6 and have matched sub with dsp. Without dsp I was not happy because of mismatch. With dsp (delay and eq) and measurement mic it did make nice match and now I would not play without sub.
I have the 1.7’s and they’re truly amazing
Truly amazing compared to what?
It's fun watching/listening to all three of you discussing various audio products and sound - it's sorta like being "a fly on the wall" in a private meeting of guys who know what they are talking about. In terms of Magnepan, I can vouch that they are SOLID, SOUND performers and "phenomenal" (sorry LOL) value! I have had "Maggies" in the past but have Dynaudios (fantastic) now due to space restrictions but I would NOT hesitate to get a pair of Magnepans again. Thanks for the fun "meetings!" I'm know Markam fairly well but live in MTL . . . wish I was closer so that I could drop by! But what with social distancing and all these days, maybe that's not such a bad thing : ) . . . for now.
Great video. Purchased the LRS for my medium space. Driven by Yamaha A-S801; low-end augmented by REL T-5. Outstanding pairing.
I sold magneplanars while going to grad school and have had them in numerous applications for over forty years... nice commentary and thoughtful discussion of three very good speakers.
Villip (spelled right?) is really good at articulating his thoughts - with humor. Much appreciated!
I could not agree with these gentlemen more. Currently running the 1.7 with Bryston 4B3 behind a Tube Preamp. I just played Kiss in Blue and every point he made is spot on. After a year with the 4B3, I have come to the conclusion that nothing needs to be changed. All I do is listen 5-6 hours each evening and am literally lifted up into the music by the Magnepan 1.7. I own a pair of 12 subs but keep them with volume at 0 because they simply are not needed 99% of the time. IMHO so many confuse Forward Bass with good bass and lose the delineation mentioned in this video.
thank you -- I've been considering this combo and wondered if the 4B3 could drive the 1.7's
Ha! I always listen to you guys all the way to the end, Vilip.
Another great video guys! Keep it up!
devotee and proud owner of magnepan speakers since 1989
year SMG A, MMG, 1.5QR sub is interesting, but just listen to megi for a short while and enjoy the music because that's all that matters
if you want to have a magical sound, buy a magneplanar, connect them with a single ended amplifier and the magic is in the house
This video is so “ORGANIC, NATURAL and positivity, absolutely PHENOMENAL”....
quick question-
Would the LRS “fly” in a small room (11 x 12 x 8’) with tubes? PrimaLuna 40w (KT 120’s) I know they want high power/high current
Thanks
So I'm moving my room from a 10x14 room to an 11.5x21. Both have 9 foot ceilings. I tried the original 1.7 in the smaller room, but I did not put the trigger. Now so I not only have more room, but I also now have two Vandersteen 2WQ subs with their adjustable Q and novel configuration, that has worked with every speaker I've tried with them with - Vandersteen 3a Signatures to Wharfedale Denton 80/KEF LS-50 to vintage Altec Valencia's. So my original plan, regardless of what people say, is to try them with the subs crossed over fairly low. When I listened to the 1.7 in the smaller room, there was no sub, and at that time I had a McIntoshMC-402. It actually struggled on more dynamic songs. Trying to narrow down the actual room size, which I don't think you did so well. 11.5x21x9. what speaker would you think does best. I'm thinking you would say either .7 or 1.7, but what say you?
@@adrianlow2114 sounds good. I got the first one about 6 years ago and just the one worked really well. Then last November I saw another one for sale for a fabulous price. Couldn't pass it up. They are both the Q models and they do great - never call attention to themselves but when the low bass is there they put it out. I doubt I'll ever get rid of them.
Hi great video guys! I once owned the 1.7 Maggie's and did move on to a dynamic speaker because of moving to a smaller room and that bass slam that was mentioned. Anyway I would like to add that the Maggie dwm bass panel would be a better choice than a sub because it is essentially the bass panel of the 3.7i for that seamless Maggie integration. I would recommend buying 2 of them to keep everything coherent, but at that price if you have the space and extra cash the 3.7i is a much better choice because the true ribbon tweeter is one of the greatest tweeters ever in hifi and a bargain for the price they go for. The 3.7i's larger bass panel might make up the need to add anything for bass for some rooms. On the down side that tweeter is faster than the mid and bass sections so it might be harder to make that speaker "dissapear" so I can see why vilip prefers the 1.7i. Sorry about my run on sentence just wanted to add my 2 cents to the conversation! Thanks! Rob
Robert B, I’ve been told by other Maggie owners and people with Magnepan experience that the only reason to move up to the .7’s or 1.7’s is for larger rooms. That the sound signature is pretty much the same between all 3. Like you said, it’s the 3.7’s where things are dramatically different. And I would love to own the true ribbon speaker but that’s. Little too much for my wallet. But at least I get to enjoy a lot of the Magnepan sound and will enjoy them for what they give me, who’s is beautiful, detailed, airy and transparent music like I’ve never had in my home before. Very enjoyable speaker!
That's wonderful! Its amazing what planar magnetic speakers do!! Have fun win your maggies!!
I really love planar magnetic headphones and the ones I've heard don't lack bass at all. I think I'd love any of these loudspeakers, but since I really value deep bass, I'd be one of the people who would always wish for as big a bass panel as I could get, or as big as is needed for the room. I'm not a bass-head. I listen at low levels but still want bass, which often just completely disappears when a system is played at conversational volume levels.
Andy B, As good as the bass is on the LRS’s, they’re completely missing an entire layer of bass that needs to be augmented by a bass panel or fast sub. Period.
Robert B, Yes! I’m sold on the Magnepan sound. I love them! It’s a completely different experience listening to the Maggie’s compared to my ZU’s. It’s nice to have both sounds. I can’t wait to add a sub into the mix with the Maggie’s. It’s going to be the RSL Speedwoofer 10s x 2. It’s that good of a sub. No joke.
aaaah the subwoofer with Maggies....I tend to agree....I happen to have one and tend to back it off......it's there to round off the sound stage. So, Said with big orchestral music a sub with maggies can really work turned up a little......but that's just my ears!
Really enjoyed the video guys. Learned some new things about Magnepans.
I have 3.6 and have matched sub with dsp. Without dsp I was not happy because of mismatch. With dsp (delay and eq) and measurement mic it did make nice match and now I would not play without sub. I still do not get mid base like dynamic woofer but it helped so much.
always enjoy the discussions. just took a demo on these maggies, hate to disagree, but thought the bass was missing. brought my own music, so knew the tunes, and the bottom was missing. they were played with rogue tube equipment and solid state.
Dang buddy give the kid a brake, he is our future and the best at what he does plus individually super successful.. he carries the whole show for all of you.
Respect!!!!
Mentor don’t criticism every little thing he says.
Agreed! That’s always the biggest negative with these guys.
Enjoyed very much!!! "Phenomenally Organic" for sure...
@@adrianlow2114 Checks in the mail....
Using 1.7i in a 11' x 14' 3-sided room. No need for a sub. Driving them with a pair of Adcom GFA-365 monoblocks. I'm not looking for any new speakers. At least not in my main system.
Phenomenal video thanks 🙏 guys.
Adrian Low send me bill Adrian 😂
Adrian Low cool, let me know when you come to New York ☕️ 😉
Just to follow up, I never used a sub with my Maggies when I had them or any other speakers I had, now I must have a sub even with my current floor standers it makes a huge difference in the sound stage and completes the sound top to bottom I highly recommend a sub or even better two if you have the space.
I have some of the earlier 1.7 Maggies. I drive them with SS amps; either ME850 , with 200+ amps @ 4 ohms, or Parasound JC1 monos with much higher output.
I find the speakers sound clear in other than the primary room, while obviously being best defined in that room e.g. doing tasks in other rooms.
Great review, I don't own Maggies at this time but I did many years ago still have the original receipt.I don't have the space now but the LRS would fit.My amp would drive them quite well being high current.I don't think the LRS would be better than what I have now just different but I still love the sound of Maggies great speakers paired with a fast sub or two fantastic!
ha! i went and listened to some 1.7i's yesterday and was impressed enough that i'm considering them (or maybe the LRS, my bonus room isn't that big) - but the first demo song played with Kiss and Blue (Hifi Buys, Atlanta)
What did you end up with? Is there a quite noticeable difference between the LRS and 1.7i?
100% spot on
I do own the 1.7i for 2 weeks now and I love them
When I add my subs via active crossover something is lost from the overall brilliance of the Maggies.
Sadly with some movies you can´t only take the maggies (at certain loudness levels), thats a problem for me.
The 1.7i speakers will go into my little nerd cave and I have to figure out if the 20.7 will have the same problem in my home theater living room.
I wish they could master even the heaviest scenes from 5.Element or Ready Player One but I´m afraid they can´t, might hold on a bit better as the 1.7i but in the end a sub is needed again.
I´m stuck at this point, I don´t want to lose 1% of what the Maggies do with 2-channel music playback, but I would need a solution where I can watch movies without doing much in adding the subs and protecting the Maggies.
Maybe a real kickass active crossover and great great subs can handle that so I can injoy both worlds, movies and music without having to switch anything
Another great video - Thanks guys - curious if you guys tried the 1.7i w/ either the PS Audio M700 or M1200 Mono Blocks? I have the M1200 and was considering adding a Maggie to my speaker collection - the folks at PS Audio feel it would be a nice match...what do you think?
Another great video guys!
Interesting review really enjoyed this. Wonder why Magnepan don't have a solid square base that makes them not tilt rather than the metal feet.
Probably too expensive.
You can add them yourself later.
You are referring to "smaller room" and "bigger room", would you give some examples of that?
If you want a sub, use a Martin Logan sub that are designed for their electrostatic speakers.
I have a huge room: 28' x 24' x 15 ft high. I can place the speakers on the long wall, about 8 ft apart and 3 ft into the room. Still lots of space to both sides and above, so is my room TOO big for the 1.7i? One dealer told me the Maggies would sound tinny + terrible without boundary walls and ceiling to act as a cabinet. Is that true?
Which Mangepan speaker would be better in my man cave/garage which is 22x30 feet. I'd be driving them with an Anthem MCA225 and I listen to classic rock cd's. Is the 1.7 better for me than the .7?
I am considering purchasing either the .7 or the 1.7i as my first panel speaker. My room is 12 by 15 ft and I have a choice of amplifiers to use. Either the Roksan Kandy K2 Integrated and Power are both rated at 200W per channel into 4Ohm. These can be used to Bi-Amp and give 4x 200W. The other choice is the Willsenton R800i which is rated at 50w/ channel but these are tube Watts which in my experience seem to be more powerful than Solid state W.atts. Can anyone give me some idea whether I have the room and gear to make this work and if so, which panel I should audition here in the UK.
How does the Tekton Double Impact or Perfect SET compare to the 1.7i apart from the obvious bass performance? How about vs 1.7i with a pair good subs?
To make a personal decision you cannot rely solely on the opinions/ impressions of others 😉
Please define the following for me in feet and inches . What size in L x W x H do you consider small , medium and large rooms ? Thanks !
Entertaining. Thanks.
Is it possible to give an approximate minimal room size(s) these speakers will work? Always fascinated by the reviews . Thank you.
Moved, new house and the room i ended up with was 10x14, 7 foot ceilings. Very small, was concerned it would be an issue… not at all. Have a small sealed sub to fill in the bottom for home theater, zero complaints. Going to upgrade my integrated. 10 (plus?) years, not even thinking about swapping out the 1.6s. The soundstage feels like it’s the entire room.
@@kellys3779 good info thank you.
When adding a slower sub, would a time delay circuit help, or are td circuits prone to have drawbacks that make them undesirable?
I watch plenty of these folks and the videos they create and sadly they never include an audio sample to go along with their assessment of the product they reviewed. With good microphones it would add to the overall compliment of the product. Just my two cents.
I wonder if there's a significant difference between 1.7i and older 1.7 ?
2 subs are a must
These guys seem to be lost in a lost world! Savy reviewers could keep us awake and attentive.
I had a devilof a time integrating subs with Maggie 0.7, I use 2, the crossovers set at 60 hz, and placement took me @ 8 hrs of moving, listening etc. In the end I needed a preamp upgrade to the parasound hint 6, and REW, and digital room correction.
You had trouble with placement or getting the eq calibration?
Your old preamp didn't have the equalization options you needed?
I had trouble with Placement but that was because the room was the wrong room for the speakers it came from a much bigger room had trouble with the equalization because of the size of the room and my old preamp did not have the ability to split off the subwoofers so there’s a lot of bleeding in the mid range from Magis to integrate at all
To integrate with a subwoofer you need a Best sub worker and you need a very very very very controlled crossover network otherwise it’s mirrors the entire bottom register
Are you placing the sub in the right spot then measuring with pink noise? If the sub is of very good calibre with very low distortion, the sub should disappear completely.
Toward the end of the video, Mr. Low mentioned that he likes to listen to these medium Maggies with tubes. Would you be specific as to the which amp you were using, please? I saw an ad from Magnepan not long ago where Wendell Diller and Dave Gordon were listening to the LRSs driven by a pair of Audio Research Reference 160M monoblocks. Talk about a price mismatch: US$650 for the speakers and US$30000 for the amps. Well, when the companies share a history together and are practically neighbors in southeast Minnesota, they can do what they want.
@@adrianlow2114 Never a bad thing to go with a classic.
Hello would a Belles sa -100 amplifier be a good amp for these speakers? Thanks
What about an open baffle sub as Magnepan is experimenting with? Are open baffle subs generally "faster" than ported or sealed cabinet subs? I understand that the bipolar nature of open baffles is a more natural match to the bipolar planar design, but does it help with "speed" at all? Obviously the "pure" solution is to add enormous panels of the same design to cover lows down below 40Hz.
The fact you can't add a sub seamlessly integrate with Magnepan the big reason I would want to buy Magnepan that are full range. I try to buy all speakers full range because subs never sound right to me.
Loved the video thank you guys!
I just got the 1.7i but my Naim Superuniti (80WPC into 8ohms, 120WPC into 4ohms) goes really hot and stopped playing to cool down.
Is H190 a good pair with 1.7i or I have to go with H390? Thanks!
good match for ps audio m 700 mono blocks?
Great Video! Adrian, what are your amplification recommendations that are not Hegel? Oh, I see you said Macintosh MC275 below. Any others to consider? And for the other guys, is the H190 enough, or do you really want to get the H390 for these? There is nothing worse than being disappointed by new speakers because the amp doesn't match. Thanks!
Why not Hegel 190?
Hey Guys,
I watched the video with much interest. I have Focal 1028be, powered by Parasound A21. But I am still wanting more High Fidelity. I listen to stream files via Amazon Music (HD or UltraHD--16-24bit/44-192khz).
I reached out to a few regarding the Magnepan 1.7i or B&W 702 S2. But I'm told the Focal's are real good. I'm not totally sold. I want high resolving, and 3D layering. Really trying to get that airy sound. Question: Do you guys think a god preamp with good DAC would make a difference? Right now using my Denon 3808ci to steer for Home Theater. Thanks! Great channel.
Open baffled or transmission line subs work well with panels
tweeter inside, or out??
I am not an audiophile or audio engineer. I have listened to several of these obviously knowledegable sincere "professionals" comments and recommenditions. There is one noticeable consideration which has never been spoken about either by content creators or viewers like my self. Audiophile commenters span a large age group. Some are as young as their 20's and 30's whilst older ones' are in the 40 to 50 age group and 60 plus years. That is a big age disparity. In my humble opinion it is not physically possible to get accurate accessments of audio output be it live or through audio equipment by anyone over age fifty or consensus between a twenty year old and a forty plus year old. As we age all of our faculties change that is a simple fact unfortunately. Sadly our ability to hear sound diminishes in various frequency ranges. That is just a fact of life. Therefore I would advise customers seeking advise with respect to audio equipment, especially speakers and amplifers to pay closer attention to reviers within the same age bracket as themselves or the principal end user.
This seems like a tense environment, I feel sorry for Jay
Jay: Hungover on Hegel.
I wonder what your thoughts are regarding the Tympani in relation to the newer Maggies
unfortunately they cannot be connected in bi wirning unlike 1.5 Qr and 1.6 Qr so it is not known how well they can actually play 1.5 1.6 and 1.7 are actually the same speakers only the year of production is different of course there are some other differences in the turnout and in the cosmetics, but I think they are the same
So, only consider if you're prepared to buy a God Tier amp to drive them?
LRS + DWM or 1.7i alone?
jon in my opinion there’s actually no question to for 1.7 yellow rice good starter speaker but the 1.7 so we can listen to it first I’m sure I’m sure you will come to this conclusion
But how tall is Jerry?! Why him and not Villip or Jay? LOL. I really hope I find out that Jerry is 210cm tall. Wow those are big panels!!! LOL. Or if Jerry is 150cm, okay - didn't realize the Magnepans were that small.
best speaker if you have an amp that can drive them
Maybe it’s just my ears, but I’ve still never heard LS or Meta 50’s sound really good. Always sounds a bit brittle and fatiguing.
Ohhh
I just miss how vilip used to kill jay in every video..
I have lived with the 1.7’s for two years had to sell them cause they didn’t play nice with all types of music. If you prefer classical and acoustic music. It’s a great chose but for up tempo rock music they really fall short. Your best to have a pair of conventional speakers along with the Maggie’s if your going to listen to let’s say classic rock.
i agree - even though i havent listened to the 1.7s ive auditioned the 20.7 with and without the subwoofer. with the sub imo just sounded more complete will without was still and excellent speaker but was missing a vital element imo.
I listen to lots of classic rock/pop/hip hop/anything on my 1.7's and love it all. Subs help, although I'm just using a tiny pair of REL T5's below 40Hz. Good amplification is key. I'm running some older ARC gear and it works great with the 1.7's. And, as always with Maggies, set up is crucial. It can take a lot of trying before you find the magic geometry for your room.
Yeah the Maggie’s are a very different and special speaker. Which require some TLC in room placement, upstream electronics and music choice. I own the LRS’s and really enjoy them for the magic they make. However if they were my main, everyday speaker, I wouldn’t own them. Like Brystonboy said, they excel at acoustic, vocals, jazz and that type of music. They also sound good with everything else I throw at them. It’s a different way of listening to some of my favorite music. Sound quality, soundstage, imaging, speed and transparency plus sound just coming from thin air is spectacular. Resolution, micro dynamics, details in music are the best I’ve ever heard. And all music sounds good on them. Well at least all well recorded music, poor music sounds poor. They’re very revealing. But as far as huge dynamics and moving air, energizing the room and really moving me the way a live concert goes, especially with certain genres of music. They do fall short to me. I did a lot of listening today with my LRS’s and then switched it up to my system am with my ZU Audio Omen Dirty Weekends and it was like a night and day difference. Used the same songs. And there were definitely songs that I enjoyed on the Maggie’s more, vocals, female vocals but for the most part, I enjoyed everything else on my ZU’s. Especially music with a lot of impact and deep drums bass drums, kick drums bass guitar. Stuff that was meant to hit you in the chest. Music that you feel not just hear. And I’m not talking about noise, or being loud or excessive. But just impact. But I could go wild with that system too. Primus, NIN, even some songs by Madonna, Prince and some jazz musicians sounded more like being at a concert with the ZU’s. Now I am planning on adding two RSL Speedwoofer’s to the Magnepan system and I am sure that will dramatically improve things. It’s simple, the LRS panels just can’t move the kind of air the 10inch drivers in the ZU’s can. There is 0 impact or startling dynamics with the Maggie’s like there is with the ZU’s.
@@jeffadams9699 this is why i didnt purchase the 20.7 as i listen to various genres of music depending on my mood. i dont want to limit muself on certain type of music.
@@jeffadams9699 have you tried any of the after market stands for the LRS? Also, would they be better vertical and or raised up off the floor 4 to 12 inches?
If i want more texture to my sound should I look for that trait in a dac ,amplifier or speakers first?
@@adrianlow2114 ty. I had a mojo and the internal dac to my rotel integrate. The rotel is normal chip sound, dynamic and spits details out with a large soundstage great for giving that surreal soundstage. But my mojo is more coherent. Prefer the integrated dac for electronic and mojo for "audiophile" have to toe the speakers in directly for mojo though and hardly any toe in for the integrated
I believe one of the gentlemen said the 1.7i has a woofer, a midrange driver and a tweeter.
Pretty sure it's a mid/woofer driver, a tweeter and a supertweeter.
The SMGas also benefited from vertical feet
My 0.7 are on verticals stands that I made, the plexiglass stand Magnapan make is horrible, it’s ugly, and unstable.
Yes. I put my SMGa’s on air conditioner brackets screwed into wood. The MMG’s are on wood that I angled so that they are straight up. I won’t go back without anchors.
So Mcintosh pays you guys to say nice things and Hegel doesn’t. Ummmm
People mean SLAM not articulate textured bass.
That darn Hegel is not the only amp for Maggies!!!!
And *certainly* not the best!
*Review better amps for Maggies!!!*
The one in the blue is annoying. He added nothing to the discussion
Christopher Pounds I appreciate hearing all three of their perspectives.
@@adrianlow2114 he was being a dick in the video at the beginning. He then said he had more to contribute that wasn't a reiteration of the lrs and .7 reviews. Just my opinion.
@@CaptainCrunch823 I appreciate when people arent condescending to others.
@@adrianlow2114 I have a brother. I know what it's like to have a brother. That said, Vilip still just tries to one up Jay with reiterated bs. Honestly it dragged the entire review down. And like Jay pointed out, he didnt get into all those details because it's basically the same as the lower models.....and hes right. All Vilip did was claim he had more to contribute and then in the end he didnt. Lol. It's cool though. I get it, you are gonna defend your boy....especially on social media. I dont blame you. Good reviews minus this one and its only diminished because of the almighty Vilip.
I couldn't disagree more with the Villip bashing. I think these three really all compliment each other very well. I appreciate what each of them bring to the discussion and I especially like the dynamic between Jay and Villip. someone mentioned brotherly and I can totally see that and I can also sense a real mutual respect between them mixed in with good hearted ribbing.
Cheap high end speakers but they need a 5000 - 10.000 dollar amp. So where is the cheap part of the story?
Not true. I have a $1000.00 Carver M-1.0t mkll running mine and they sound awesome.
Respected elder…haha bs.
What a wierd ! _ you talked about the speakers _ but do not let people hear them. LOL
👎