at 11:04 that isn't on the official that is the coaches issue...yes we have to enforce the rules and who knows the discussion before and during the game....Love the videos
That's a good observation, and a difficult one to assess. I do not believe the defenders saw the signal to give up, however, if we spoke to the PR about what is and isn't a valid signal, I think you would have a leg to stand on if you threw the flag.
First play: Question that has to be asked of the official is did he try to throw him at the bench? If so, he's gone for flagrant. Definitely the 15. Second play: And I've got ANOTHER late hit there. And the question I have on that one, that looks to be two consecutive plays too. Third: Good no-call, but given what has apparently already gone on in the game... Fourth: Definite DB UC 72 Purple. Could be more than that.
![สาวเมืองเพชร - ธีเดช ทองอภิชาติ [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kEt7F9PvO3I/mqdefault.jpg)
at 11:04 that isn't on the official that is the coaches issue...yes we have to enforce the rules and who knows the discussion before and during the game....Love the videos
Brian, @ 6:06 do you see an illegal/invald signal from R22? If so, shouldn't we have shut this play down? Looking forward to your thoughts
That's a good observation, and a difficult one to assess. I do not believe the defenders saw the signal to give up, however, if we spoke to the PR about what is and isn't a valid signal, I think you would have a leg to stand on if you threw the flag.
First play: Question that has to be asked of the official is did he try to throw him at the bench? If so, he's gone for flagrant. Definitely the 15.
Second play: And I've got ANOTHER late hit there. And the question I have on that one, that looks to be two consecutive plays too.
Third: Good no-call, but given what has apparently already gone on in the game...
Fourth: Definite DB UC 72 Purple. Could be more than that.
Is throwing a punch a automatic ejection?
Yes but an open hand to the face is not a punch.