I like these compilation episodes, they condense each story down to the main points and focus on the investigation, which is the reason I watch this show in the first place. I used to watch Forensic Files back in the day for the same reason, I find the scientific and logical methods in putting together what happened fascinating.
I agree, many are padded out with the stories of people on the plane, which can be interesting but sometimes there is too much padding to make the episode longer. I was pleasantly surprised there were 3 investigations in this one video. It was well put together and concise. 🙏
Agreed! Whenever they pad the episode with D-quality actors doing mediocre reenactments, I’m always hitting “fast forward”. The compilations are much better. However…if they managed to hire Dateline’s Keith Morrison to do the narration, I’d watch their overly-padded episodes ALL NIGHT LONG. Morrison could read the dictionary for all I care. He has THE BEST voice on TV.
Well, these cases are ones that were relatively simple. So stretching each into an hour long ep would've been annoying. But most of the other cases kinda need all that time to explain all the developments.
Free falling in a plane must be the most terrifying way to go. The anger, sadness and regret for getting on that plane know your imminent death while waiting for impact. You just pray the impact is what kills you and not fire. RIP to all those on board who lost their lives 🙏🏻♥️
Wow, what a PSYCHO this guy was. I've never heard of this story. Killed dozens of innocent people because he was the one who stole money and got fired.
@@ziffle Not really... He did make them lose lots of money and lose several of their employees, along with all the other people who died. So, he did accomplish his objective, it's just that it was a PSYCHO objective, as @alechamid235 put it.
This show gets a lot right just in terms of how it is presented and in doing so they made something that is quite entertaining. I am talking about it's pace, the narrator and how it is sequenced. The reenactments are not low budget either. Any loss of life is tragic but many of these accidents just leave you shaking your head - like there are a few where junior pilots just watch everyone, including themselves, die because they are afraid to correct their superior. I know after the fact we have a different vantage point but damn.
Tell your mom from me that watching these episodes sitting in a plane ready to take off, also while taking altitude and at 33,000ft in the sky is a special and intense experiece ❤
@@lionman3378most likely anyone who maintains a "I'm a victim" attitude who would justify any nefarious actions committed by them. Sometimes, today's culture, the media, and politicians, can foster such unfortunate and often crippling mindsets in individuals. No one is immune to adopting such an attitude if they refuse to take full responsibility for their success or failure in their own life.
I really wanted to hear those court trials. Like, if this was not a deliberate act why in gods name would you ever bring those on an airplane, let alone together. I really wanna know what explanation was brought up in court.
Bomb detector -beep beep beep, baggage claim guy - it's not the right sound even even though none of the other bags make any noise let's put it on the plane 😳
Back in that day, certain instruments could make sounds for no reason at all, or could make one type of noise for something hazardous, and another for something harmless. The rushed instructions were probably somewhat to blame - if the instructor had said "if this makes any noise, separate the bag," that probably would have prevented the problem. Still, hindsight is always 20/20, but foresight not so much.
@@saralgupta5250 I can think of multiple possible reasons: It takes time to double check with the expert, if you can even find him. The planes are trying to get off the ground by a certain time. If you create multiple unnecessary delays, you can get yelled at/demoted/lose your job. Attempting to blow up airplanes was not common. False alarm might get you sued, the co-worker's instrument will be set off by the same things that falsely set your instrument off, there was nobody nearby to check with...
@@annep.1905 how much time does it take to check a bag for a homemade bomb also this is the perspective given by him theres no actual proof that the sound was different it could have been a cover for if someone else heard that sound as there were multiple personnels together pak was obviously involved and idk why but ig there WERE INTERNAL MOLES
@@ginag.9316 Yep. A tragic oversite but things were pretty lax before the 21st century. Nowadays they take your badge and cancel your email the day you are fired.
So this athelete dude says HE didn't carry the gasoline on board... he just "handed his bag to a family member that carried it on board". Then says "my family was on board, why would I carry gas on the plane" (and risk their lives). YEAH... why did you? It doesn't matter if YOU carried it or you gave your bag to someone else **to carry on board** ... YOU were the reason it was there.
Yeah in all honesty that is true but the guilt is on the the guys job to ensure safety. Should be fired and put down as a potential threat to any security job in the future. As for the bozo claiming that it was only bleach who knows actually.. maybe his family members should have been questioned. Maybe the guy who brought the battery “knew” there was gas in the bleach bottle… just saying…
41:23 That’s just wrong! He was the one who carried gasoline onto the plane, so how’s he not responsible? I think that country was protecting a star athlete. Same goes for the person who brought the motorcycle battery on board.
Court systems tend to be pretty strict about what kind of evidence is sufficient. I don't know how it works the ROC, but I'm assuming there's probably a requirement to prove intent, and since the fuel was in a bleach bottle, it probably would have required compelling evidence to prove that he intended to bring something other than bleach into the plane.
It's not that difficult to understand why he was released in the end, and your comment only showed your ignorance of what happened. This video skipped over some details. 1. Firstly, he was actually sentenced to 10 years in prison. It took 3 retrials with new evidence coming out to reach that not guilty result. It was later found that the fragments linked to the gasoline were not linked to his specific bottle. If they were protecting a star athlete at all costs? Why did "they" not protect him in the first 2 trials? And to drag him through 2 more retrials after the first not guilty verdict? 2. Secondly, you have to prove that the bottle carrying the gasoline belonged to him in the first place. Those bottles were/are common and there was no hard evidence that it was indeed his exact bottle. He was convicted initially likely based on circumstantial evidence in this way only. The fact that the only person who died was his own brother also could obviously have earned him some more benefit of the doubt. 3. Thirdly, it's not a crime to carry gasoline on a plane per se. He wasn't the one who took the battery through. The fire was ruled overall an accident rather than a malicious act, and there was also no motive identified on his end. At most, it was negligence and lying to the authorities. Also, in theory, a battery could have caught on fire and exploded on its own, but gasoline could not. This means the battery was the fundamental element in causing the fire. 4. Furthermore, he was no longer a "star athlete" by that point. I obviously can't tell how well-known he really was at that time, but looking at his records, not only had he never won anything at any Olympics (only Asian Games), his last win even just nationally was in 1993. This happened in 1999, when he already retired and was only a PE teacher at a secondary school. The first not guilty verdict came only in 2008 (when he literally already served his revised sentence in full), 15 years after his last athletic win, and the constant retrials only ended in 2011, 18 years after his last win. In other words, there was no direct evidence linking him to it, and even if there was, he would have been a secondary party in non-malicious negligence, all while he was already irrelevant in the athletic scene. He only received the verdict of not guilty after he's served his sentence in full and it gave him nothing other than his reputation (as an irrelevant has been) back. That's hardly "protecting a star athlete".
Its so gut wrenching to know that incidents like the 1st story has to happen in order for air flights to be safer in all ends. Im not speaking of mechanical, but hijacked issues.
Often times it takes several bad accidents for people to take health and safety laws seriously. The amount of nightclub fires, stampedes etc around the world wouldn't have happened if governments had taken the necessary safety steps that were expected of them and that other countries were doing for years prior. Kiss nightclub fire and seoul crush for example.
These days, there are X Ray machines and metal detectors. And these days, bringing a gun, loaded or unloaded, through an airport checkpoint is automatic jail.
Bleach is quite a dangerous liquid on its own. The fumes are toxic to most people - why would you leave bleach in baggage in the first place. It’s cheap, easily obtainable - the security person should have confiscated it anyway. Wouldn’t most people, security or not, find that it shouldn’t go on board? I don’t know why anyone would buy two bottles of bleach, let alone have it in cabin luggage? 🤔
I'll never understand. Someone put gas in those bottles. Someone knows the truth. Someone is living with that truth, and I pray they come forward. A guilty conscience is a terrible thing to live with. Thank God it didn't happen while the plane was in the air. May the passenger that perished rest in peace. Prayers for all the injured, physically, mentally, and emotionally.
Well no they dont need to come forward. They say it right there in the documentary that the person who brought the gas on the plane was Ku Chin Shui. He was tried 5 times and declared not guilty because they found gasoline on multiple items other than the bottles. I couldnt find much on who actually brought a broken live motor battery which caused the ignition and subsequent explosion. I cant think of reasons he'd need gasoline specifically but you cant bring things such as pressurized cans either so the charge on him would be the same as if someone brought a can of axe body spray and someone else put a lighter in a different compartment that caused it to burst. Guilty conscience is right though seeing as the person who died is actually his brother who was likely under the compartment that exploded.
They found a few who died of drowning but could have been unconscious as they drowned including a pregnant woman whose fetus was found to have been perfectly fine and died after the woman drowned. Absolutely terrifying.
As a frequent traveller, way too many planes take off with my bags and with much stress and frustration without me so I think these baggage rules introduced after Air India aren't followed as much as people think
Hi I work at the airport :) Bags aren’t allowed to be checked in unless we know the passengers flying. When the plane is delayed, or u miss ur flight etc. Ur bag can fly w/o u bc our systems confirmed when and with who u’ll eventually fly. So yes the procedure & checks are done properly. Esp after 9/11 we have to. The regulation states that Luggage cannot be checked in unless the passenger is checked in & confirmed to fly. It doesnt have to specifically be w/ a passenger onboard but it has to be confirmed that its checked in w/ a passenger who is or will eventually be flying :)
@@CaIiforniaL0VE Not sure about that. I was flying to Bolivia from Montreal and landed in Miami, in March 2002 (6 months after 9/11) and I had missed my plane with AA to LaPaz. I had checked-in my luggage and was waiting for a later flight to LaPaz (9 hr layover). I boarded the later flight and arrived in LaPaz early morning the next day. I was looking for my luggage on the carrousel and couldn't find it. I asked luggage service to help and a lady working in baggage claim walked me into a storage room where I found my luggage. It turns out that my luggage arrived before and without me on a previous flight. So, please explain what might have gone wrong?
@@ejcash7234 Well, you *did* eventually fly, then. So that's exactly what CaliforniaL0VE said - it doesn't necessarily have to be on the same flight as you are, but as long as you do fly...
@@ejcash7234 thats cos u were confirmed to fly, the reverse also happens where the passenger flies and their luggage would be sent on another flight behind it, what doesnt happen is a luggage flying with no passenger.
Me either, but they learned from the errors in the past. That should give us enough confidence. I fly three to four times a year with two being international flights 😅
Just remember that every time you get into a car, you’re facing a much, much higher risk than a plane. Your odds of dying in a plane crash are 1 in 1.2 million, compared to 1 in 5,000 for being in a fatal car accident. Plane accidents are incredibly rare and taken very seriously, all of the accidents you’ve heard about were learned from and are part of the reason why air travel is so safe today. Of course it still carries a risk, but so does any action you take in life.
I dunno. I think watching these shows me just how much effort this industry puts into stopping any and all causes of crashes. Really interesting example was TACA Flight 110 where the engines flamed out because they flew through a thunderstorm with the engines at low throttle, and they were only tested at high throttle. Then more recently, Qantas flight 32 landed with one engine that refused to shut down. The firies tried blasting water down the front of the engine (while it was at idle) with one of their high volume water canons and the engine refused to shut down. Clearly plane engines' testing has been changed so that even at idle, they can handle some pretty torrential rain.
This show is insanely well made and captivating, top production. I'm used to TH-camrs analyzing air disasters and while they do a great job with the tools they have, it doesn't come close to this level.
I know for a fact that a US based airline took off with my bag and I wasn’t on the flight. I arrived early enough and checked in my bags and never made it to the terminal to board. It was an international flight and i was marked a ‘no show’. They went in about how it was my fault and they may not be about to put me on another flight until well after the holidays. I said okay and what not then asked for my checked in bags to go home and they were all looking at me. They eventually put me on another flight and I made the trip. Didn’t see my bags until reaching final destination.
In Australia, if a passenger fails to board on time, then the flight is delayed whilst that passenger's luggage is unloaded from the cargo hold. I've been on flights whilst that happens, the delays have sometimes taken ~15 minutes.
Hi I work at the airport checking in international flights :) When the plane is delayed, or u miss ur flight etc. Ur bag can fly w/o u bc we know u’ll eventually fly. So yes the procedure & checks are done properly. Esp after 9/11 we have to. The regulation states that Luggage cannot be checked in unless the passenger is checked in & confirmed to fly. It doesnt have to specifically be w/ a passenger onboard but it has to be confirmed that its checked in w/ a passenger who is or will eventually be flying :) Like one of the commenters stated YES if ur not boarding ur bags were supposed to be offloaded but bc u stated u wanted another flight i believe ur bags were sent bc u wld eventually fly out & YES the no show & blaming u is bs! Im sorry they made u feel like that
I feel kind of sorry for that airline employee who allowed that bag with the bomb through when she broke the rule. She is responsible for all those deaths. She must feel so guilty and can never escape it. I wouldnt want to be in her shoes.
Probably one of the reasons why they don't do that anymore. Now we all complain about how small the limits are for bringing liquids onboard. Well, this is why that rule is there.
Pacific Southwest Airlines Flight 1771 was estimated to have been traveling at 770 miles per hour (1,240 kilometers per hour) when it crashed into a hillside in the Santa Lucia Mountains near Paso Robles and Cayucos at 4:16 PM. The plane disintegrated instantly after hitting the rocky ground.
Wow, you figured out all by yourself that PSA 1771 'disintegrated instantly' after vertical impact with hard ground at 1240 km/hr? FFS, do you think everybody else needs to be TOLD this?
How can an employee who's been fired still keep their credentials?? Why weren't they forced to give them up at the time of termination? That's the biggest no-brainer ever.
Bc something like that never happened before. Sadly in Aviation everythings regulated after something happens. If we get fired now, we have to IMMEDIATELY turn in our security badge (I work at the airport) In our trainings we HAD to watch a video about this flight & had an examination about this exact incident, why we turn in our badges & how it changed regulations
This is alarming to know that with this incident and many like it that the cockpits were not reinforced BFORE 9/11 and such a tragedy could have been averted.
What I was wondering is why were there leads linked to battery post? Something very wrong here,, you never leave wires hooked to a battery post, They wanted it to spark!
It was probably an accident ...why did t smell the gasoline when they were prowling around in the Baggage carry below strolling & looking for stuff . ...they could have been bored!? Don't ask me.. ..
For the life of me, I'll never, ever, understand why passengers use aircrafts to transport all sorts of household products. Get to your home, then take your car, or the bus, or a cab, go to a store and buy your freaking cleaning products and go back home. Don't take an airplane to do basic shopping!
It takes courageous people, like those on 9/11 who took down one of the weaponized planes, they probably saved hundreds to thousands of people. Most are so fearful, they freeze. They want to do something but cannot. Others are courage filled and brave.
As others have noted, some people may freeze in fear, not wanting to catch the 3rd bullet. Also, some people may be waiting to act, hoping for an unguarded minute on the gunman's part. And some people may freeze simply because they do not know what to do - they have been faced with a situation which they never expected to encounter, and need time to figure out a plan of action, but time may be something they do not have.
There are still issues with security at the airport. I have seen screeners just go through the motions while checking baggage. They don’t make a lot of money from TSA, but are better paid than security officers.
I agree & disagree lol. I work at the airport, so I agree theres loopholes to bypass security or the agent isnt that careful bc they’re overworked esp at my busy airport LAX. Where I disagree is tsa’s arent paid alot bc in california TSA’s make the highest amt of money in the airport after flight attendants & pilots. Im a check in agent & we make minimum compared to them.
1:08 Pacific Southwest Airlines Flight 1771 From Air Disasters: "I'm the Problem" (S11.E10) 17:31 Air India Flight 182 From Air Disasters:"Air India:"Explosive Evidence" (S5.E7) 27:59 Uni Air Flight 873 From Air Disasters:Explosive Touchdown (S20.E3) Mayday Air Disaster - The Accident Files from Season 3 Episode 4 "Lapse in Security" Traced to the breakdown of vital safety measures three horrific air disasters provoke fundamental changes to airport security procedures around the world a passenger plane is obliterated in the California Hills and investigators find a smoking gun in the wreckage a 747 explodes over the Atlantic and after a routine landing fire engulfs a commuter plane in Taiwan
David Burke could just move to another state with his family and with the remaining money. Starting a new life is better than committing THAT... Or he could just unalive his boss at night near his house, but not on a plane😢
A Nigerian DC-3 of OGIBUBUGUJU Airlines ( a domestic carrier) flying between the capital Lagos and Kaduna state crashed after the Captain had a stomach bacterial infection/food poisoning. He stood up in the cockpit and accidentally diarrhea on the central console causing a short circuit in the electrical system. The plane’s magnetos ( it was a piston engined radial job) failed and the aircraft made a forced landing in the jungle. INCREDIBLY!!!! Everyone survived.
Does anyone realize they say the same few words in every episode? Like “the worst disaster in…” or “the most devastating disaster in…” but then they change it up a little like “the worst accident in a decade” “the worst disaster in LA” etc etc
@24:16 Then that employee that allowed that should be brought up on felony charges..... And so should whatever that is speaking. The sheer incompetence of these nitwits.
on a flight I took two years ago from Denver to California, they let my bag fly to California before I did. It got there hours before I even left Denver🤦🏾♀️ I always think of Air India when I remember that
Not long after the Air India disaster we flew Toronto to Gatwick with them. The security was horrendous, 3 security searches and the plane was gated right near the airport security fence well away from other aircraft. As we taxied out the RCMP drove along under each wing. They peeled away as we entering the runway.
I was in Frankfurt Germany once boarding a Lufthansa flight to Atlanta. There was a bomb threat called in and they put all the luggage on the ground and everyone had to point out their luggage and then board the plane and only then was your luggage loaded. This way if you had something that was going to blow up in your bags, you were damn sure going to have a front row seat to the event. Thankfully, nothing blew up but it's a sickening feeling knowing a bomb threat was called in on the plane you're ridingon. 😂😅
I work at LAX and theres a bomb threat every few months! 98% of the time its a false alarm but every time it happens its a hassle bc every bag, passenger, worker etc we ALL exit the airport & stand outside until its investigated thoroughly.
@@NateCooper111 If you’re lucky enough to get there, I’d like to ask your opinion then, but I’ll be long dead in my grave and I won’t get the chance. Lucky you.
9:52 I like how, when they reacted the situation that the whole is about few years inches deep when, if a plane were to hit like that, it’d be 7 feet deep minimum
I worked for the company that handled Air India's cargo. We got a transfer of diplomatic cargo, and it was run out to the aircraft and loaded onto the last LD-3 going into the belly. The rest is history. Dip mail is MUST GO on the first available so as soon as we got it, it was in the jeep and off to Terminal 2 at Pearson. No one had a chance to look at it or even think about in Toronto.
@@eco_man_8652 This show is about airplane accidents. There's one episode about a train accident and one about a ferry, but that's it. As for the original question, "hate" is a strong word. I prefer the single-accident episodes, but I certainly don't mind these episodes with thematically related accidents.
@@eco_man_8652 Except he is *NOT* the only one, there are hundreds of comments in relation to how people really do not like these types of documentaries. I, too, much prefer the single crash vids as they are much more detailed.
23:37 the actress doing the role of the ticket agent is she the same one who did the role of one of the flight attendants on the episode documenting the disaster of Flight 4184
Canadian Govt + Khalistan bombers = Air India 182. An alert was issued a month ago for this kinda of activity, but the OFC Canadian government ignored it. Only 1 person was jailed, and all the suspects remain free. The terrorist organization "Khalistan" which was behind this attack, currently thrives in Canada including in their parliament.
What exactly do you need a motorcycle battery for on a plane, and old one at that? Some of you people don't need to fly, walking is probably a big enough challenge for you.
Why didnt the first plane in this story explode in a fireball when it hit the ground?? Was it out of fuel? You only see a big dust cloud. That is so very odd. And they say nothing was left not even the chairs ? Well what happened to the chairs? And why were the papers A OK? Just seems very strange. I dont get it. No fire apparently but yet no chairs. Where did they go? All of those chairs cannot just vanish!
The theory doesn't explain how gasoline got into the bleach bottle...wtf? Was there no real investigation into that? If that guy put gas in the bottle or knew there was gas in the bottle, he should have been at least somewhat legally responsible.
@@Darthjacob-xg9sm that's so strange the urge to need 6 separate trials and not discover the simple fact that he brought 2 bottles of bleach with gasoline. For me it's very clear: it was intended with someone else inside the plane. It's plausible investigators doesn't know why or how, but the fact still remais .... You are the only responsable to bring gasoline.
8:43 yeahhh, I don’t care what year this took place. If on a plane and some dude starts shooting. I’m not just sitting there waiting to die. Like if I’m going to die, it’ll be because of me, not anyone else
🎉🎉🎉 Does anyone happen to know if this first accident is the one that happened in Templeton, California? Most of the locals around here (Templton) don’t believe me when I mention this. Thank you for any help that you can provide. Blessings,Carlos ✝️🙏❤️😊🇺🇸
@@trawlins396 Are you ok? How did my feedback trigger you so bad? I mean I even started with how much I like the show and then only said I wish they would title them correctly. I hope you get to feeling better.
We are so goofy with our false sense of security you guys realize when I worked for Everts as the person who just answered the phone... Employees like McDonald's employees we just go in the airport... We can go through any door... We have no reason to be in that airport in Anchorage Alaska but we can go through the airport and no issue whatsoever... I found myself in some places I'm like man if I had nefarious intentions... We're not going to stop people who are motivated all we are doing is inconveniencing ourselves for false sense of security
I was working as ground personal in two airports - a small one and big one. In big airport there is a separate entrance wirh scanner and so on for the agents but in small one we had to use the same as passangers. The passangers are rude, the most of them make a drama if the employees want to go without standing in line, even wirhout us they can't to on the board. In big airport there was once the situation that young filmmaker group decided to spare money and take the equipment as baggage on the same flights. They have a small diesel generator with some diesel in! And some big Li-accumulators also which exeeded the allowed volume. The group went from plead to threaten. It is crazy how the people behave in the airport.
You’d be surprised that security is still not that tight at airports in regards to their employees. As someone who used to work in the ramp, at a smaller city airport, we didn’t have to go through security. I think some ramp agents didn’t have to go through security in larger airports either because a few years ago, ramp agents out of ATL were smuggling guns on Delta flights.
I work at LAX as a check in agent for an Airline. Theres a “secret passageway” for employees to use that bypasses TSA. Only Check in agents are allowed to use this passage w/ a security badge bc we don’t fly with passengers we check them in and board our flights. Most of us use this path bc LAX is extremely busy & its a hassle for us to wait in long TSA lines, especially when we need to board on time. Im just now realizing that this isn’t a good thing, bc even though were thoroughly screened to get a job like this, u never know whose on the verge of “snapping” & doing something as horrific as this.
As for the gasoline, if it was leaking anywhere near as much as depicted, how would passengers and crew not smell that? That episode leaves nothing but unanswered questions.
I can't help but comment out of curiosity. Where are the bodies and the chairs or parts of the plane? Did they burn because of the impact? Wouldn't the chairs be made of metal parts though? Was the impact really that bad? When that Oceangate submarine collapsed there were so many engineers that made videos calculating the Physics forces that were involved and gave us numbers. I wish that was more common but included in videos like this, not the calculation but at least things like what speed the plane could be travelling/falling at for such kind of an impact on metal parts and flesh and bones.
I like these compilation episodes, they condense each story down to the main points and focus on the investigation, which is the reason I watch this show in the first place. I used to watch Forensic Files back in the day for the same reason, I find the scientific and logical methods in putting together what happened fascinating.
Yeah, I actually prefer the ones with more than one story together
I agree, many are padded out with the stories of people on the plane, which can be interesting but sometimes there is too much padding to make the episode longer. I was pleasantly surprised there were 3 investigations in this one video. It was well put together and concise. 🙏
Agreed! Whenever they pad the episode with D-quality actors doing mediocre reenactments, I’m always hitting “fast forward”.
The compilations are much better.
However…if they managed to hire Dateline’s Keith Morrison to do the narration, I’d watch their overly-padded episodes ALL NIGHT LONG.
Morrison could read the dictionary for all I care. He has THE BEST voice on TV.
Forensic Files rules!
Well, these cases are ones that were relatively simple. So stretching each into an hour long ep would've been annoying. But most of the other cases kinda need all that time to explain all the developments.
David Burke, wow, what a coward! He breaks the law, steals money from his employer, and yet it's everyone else's fault!
Typical if you know what I mean.
@@peterjones4621 typical? We all aren't the same. It's people that have your thought process that makes it harder for those of us that are decent.
@@peterjones4621Oh yeah, we know indeed what your kind means.
@@peterjones4621 oh here we go
@@peterjones4621i mean youre not wrong…. But common, that joke was too easy 😂
Free falling in a plane must be the most terrifying way to go. The anger, sadness and regret for getting on that plane know your imminent death while waiting for impact. You just pray the impact is what kills you and not fire. RIP to all those on board who lost their lives 🙏🏻♥️
I'm imagining in those final moments the passengers must be thinking they have to be in a bad dream ,desperately hoping they are
The fact that the flight attendant opened the cockpit door was opened instead of keeping it closed knowing the risk. Shocks me.
It wouldn’t have mattered. That was in 1987 when cockpit security was nowhere near what it is today. There were many changes after 9/11
She was probably forced to.
The fact that you don’t realize he was obviously right there with her and she didn’t have a choice.
That was a different time. 9/11 hadn’t happened yet
Cockpits should be only opened from the inside or remotely. It also needs to house video surveillance that’s sent directly to the TSA & the cockpit.
Safety regs are written in blood.
Deep
Some are, yes. Some are written in nothing more than fear, or the desire to control others.
@@annep.1905 Proof of your assertion, please.
@@flawedexistence If you hold down a job somewhere, you'll soon see it. The TSA is particularly notorious for it, but they're not the only ones.
@@annep.1905 the desire to control others. Give us an objective example please.
Wow, what a PSYCHO this guy was. I've never heard of this story. Killed dozens of innocent people because he was the one who stole money and got fired.
He wanted to punish the company. The only way to really do that is to embarrass them and make them lose lots of money.
@@aznsbd Yeah, and all he did was show what a coward he is
@@ziffle Not really... He did make them lose lots of money and lose several of their employees, along with all the other people who died.
So, he did accomplish his objective, it's just that it was a PSYCHO objective, as @alechamid235 put it.
I showed this TV series to my mom and now she’s hooked
This show gets a lot right just in terms of how it is presented and in doing so they made something that is quite entertaining. I am talking about it's pace, the narrator and how it is sequenced. The reenactments are not low budget either. Any loss of life is tragic but many of these accidents just leave you shaking your head - like there are a few where junior pilots just watch everyone, including themselves, die because they are afraid to correct their superior. I know after the fact we have a different vantage point but damn.
Tell your mom from me that watching these episodes sitting in a plane ready to take off, also while taking altitude and at 33,000ft in the sky is a special and intense experiece ❤
The first case is classic. They steal or do something illegal and once caught and have to face consequences they feels like a victims...
Who exactly are you talking about?
@@lionman3378most likely anyone who maintains a "I'm a victim" attitude who would justify any nefarious actions committed by them. Sometimes, today's culture, the media, and politicians, can foster such unfortunate and often crippling mindsets in individuals. No one is immune to adopting such an attitude if they refuse to take full responsibility for their success or failure in their own life.
@@lionman3378 I think they are called perpetual victims - people with victim mindset.
Why would so someone bring gasoline onto a flight. I don't understand?
@@tomdooley4226all blacks are victims don’t ya know
What kind of idiots bring gasoline and a motorcycle battery on a plane.
I really wanted to hear those court trials. Like, if this was not a deliberate act why in gods name would you ever bring those on an airplane, let alone together. I really wanna know what explanation was brought up in court.
The kind of idiot that would bring gasoline and a motorcycle battery, that’s what.
Not JUST a battery, but a battery with bare wires connected to the terminals!
"The TSA site said I could!"
Not idiots.
Bomb detector -beep beep beep, baggage claim guy - it's not the right sound even even though none of the other bags make any noise let's put it on the plane 😳
Ikr? I don't know what each combination of beep means but a beep means warning or at least something and I will separate that beeped bag regardless.
Back in that day, certain instruments could make sounds for no reason at all, or could make one type of noise for something hazardous, and another for something harmless. The rushed instructions were probably somewhat to blame - if the instructor had said "if this makes any noise, separate the bag," that probably would have prevented the problem. Still, hindsight is always 20/20, but foresight not so much.
@@annep.1905Certain instruments could make noise. Then use an instrument from a coworker to double check. Why just ignore it?
@@saralgupta5250 I can think of multiple possible reasons:
It takes time to double check with the expert, if you can even find him. The planes are trying to get off the ground by a certain time. If you create multiple unnecessary delays, you can get yelled at/demoted/lose your job. Attempting to blow up airplanes was not common. False alarm might get you sued, the co-worker's instrument will be set off by the same things that falsely set your instrument off, there was nobody nearby to check with...
@@annep.1905 how much time does it take to check a bag for a homemade bomb
also this is the perspective given by him theres no actual proof that the sound was different it could have been a cover for if someone else heard that sound as there were multiple personnels together
pak was obviously involved and idk why but ig there WERE INTERNAL MOLES
It’s your fault that I stole money on the job. “I am the problem.”
not gonna lie though that"s a pretty good one liner.
"what's the problem?"
"I am the problem." *BANG*
I don't understand why his badge wasn't collected from him. Most jobs you must turn in your badge when fired .
huh?
@@ginag.9316my thoughts exactly. Don’t they usually take their badges away from workers after they’re fired or laid off??
@@ginag.9316 Yep. A tragic oversite but things were pretty lax before the 21st century. Nowadays they take your badge and cancel your email the day you are fired.
So this athelete dude says HE didn't carry the gasoline on board... he just "handed his bag to a family member that carried it on board". Then says "my family was on board, why would I carry gas on the plane" (and risk their lives). YEAH... why did you? It doesn't matter if YOU carried it or you gave your bag to someone else **to carry on board** ... YOU were the reason it was there.
I was thinking the same thing!
@@amydavis4945
Accountability is all but extinct in this day & age.
Bro used his family as a scapegoat when the consequences of his actions came to bite him
Yeah in all honesty that is true but the guilt is on the the guys job to ensure safety.
Should be fired and put down as a potential threat to any security job in the future.
As for the bozo claiming that it was only bleach who knows actually.. maybe his family members should have been questioned. Maybe the guy who brought the battery “knew” there was gas in the bleach bottle… just saying…
41:23 That’s just wrong! He was the one who carried gasoline onto the plane, so how’s he not responsible? I think that country was protecting a star athlete. Same goes for the person who brought the motorcycle battery on board.
I'm agree with that.
Something smells very bad about this
Court systems tend to be pretty strict about what kind of evidence is sufficient. I don't know how it works the ROC, but I'm assuming there's probably a requirement to prove intent, and since the fuel was in a bleach bottle, it probably would have required compelling evidence to prove that he intended to bring something other than bleach into the plane.
It's not that difficult to understand why he was released in the end, and your comment only showed your ignorance of what happened. This video skipped over some details.
1. Firstly, he was actually sentenced to 10 years in prison. It took 3 retrials with new evidence coming out to reach that not guilty result. It was later found that the fragments linked to the gasoline were not linked to his specific bottle. If they were protecting a star athlete at all costs? Why did "they" not protect him in the first 2 trials? And to drag him through 2 more retrials after the first not guilty verdict?
2. Secondly, you have to prove that the bottle carrying the gasoline belonged to him in the first place. Those bottles were/are common and there was no hard evidence that it was indeed his exact bottle. He was convicted initially likely based on circumstantial evidence in this way only. The fact that the only person who died was his own brother also could obviously have earned him some more benefit of the doubt.
3. Thirdly, it's not a crime to carry gasoline on a plane per se. He wasn't the one who took the battery through. The fire was ruled overall an accident rather than a malicious act, and there was also no motive identified on his end. At most, it was negligence and lying to the authorities. Also, in theory, a battery could have caught on fire and exploded on its own, but gasoline could not. This means the battery was the fundamental element in causing the fire.
4. Furthermore, he was no longer a "star athlete" by that point. I obviously can't tell how well-known he really was at that time, but looking at his records, not only had he never won anything at any Olympics (only Asian Games), his last win even just nationally was in 1993. This happened in 1999, when he already retired and was only a PE teacher at a secondary school. The first not guilty verdict came only in 2008 (when he literally already served his revised sentence in full), 15 years after his last athletic win, and the constant retrials only ended in 2011, 18 years after his last win.
In other words, there was no direct evidence linking him to it, and even if there was, he would have been a secondary party in non-malicious negligence, all while he was already irrelevant in the athletic scene. He only received the verdict of not guilty after he's served his sentence in full and it gave him nothing other than his reputation (as an irrelevant has been) back. That's hardly "protecting a star athlete".
Its so gut wrenching to know that incidents like the 1st story has to happen in order for air flights to be safer in all ends. Im not speaking of mechanical, but hijacked issues.
If there were no blacks in America or the world, the first air crash would never have happened.
Often times it takes several bad accidents for people to take health and safety laws seriously. The amount of nightclub fires, stampedes etc around the world wouldn't have happened if governments had taken the necessary safety steps that were expected of them and that other countries were doing for years prior. Kiss nightclub fire and seoul crush for example.
People who do this sort of thing are the lowest kind of coward.
These days, there are X Ray machines and metal detectors. And these days, bringing a gun, loaded or unloaded, through an airport checkpoint is automatic jail.
Unless they're the plastic 3D ones
@@disellin4871 Those still have metal parts required for operation like springs (recoil and magazine) and barrels.
Wow, I thought I’d seen all of the episodes but I hadn’t heard about this first one 😢
You lucked out because it’s been on before. Unfortunately.
It's been on before on the air disasters show on the television ,
The 1st one ,
The violent captain & the suicidal pilot into the Swiss alps ,
Employees are always your weakest link or your best asset.
Bleach is quite a dangerous liquid on its own. The fumes are toxic to most people - why would you leave bleach in baggage in the first place. It’s cheap, easily obtainable - the security person should have confiscated it anyway. Wouldn’t most people, security or not, find that it shouldn’t go on board? I don’t know why anyone would buy two bottles of bleach, let alone have it in cabin luggage? 🤔
This is why I’m glad security measures are more strict nowadays.
So horrible accidents like this don’t happen again.
They "appear" strict. You should read what some ATF agents disclose
@@mu0FFpu0FF can you provide sources?
@zeynepzeldatuzlu8616 no i don't have them memorized. Just Google it bruh
@@mu0FFpu0FFsource : TrUsT Me BrO
same but i still hate tsa. some of the ruddest people i've ever met
I'll never understand. Someone put gas in those bottles. Someone knows the truth. Someone is living with that truth, and I pray they come forward. A guilty conscience is a terrible thing to live with. Thank God it didn't happen while the plane was in the air. May the passenger that perished rest in peace. Prayers for all the injured, physically, mentally, and emotionally.
Gasoline could have been for his car, or to polish something like sneakers
Well no they dont need to come forward. They say it right there in the documentary that the person who brought the gas on the plane was Ku Chin Shui. He was tried 5 times and declared not guilty because they found gasoline on multiple items other than the bottles. I couldnt find much on who actually brought a broken live motor battery which caused the ignition and subsequent explosion. I cant think of reasons he'd need gasoline specifically but you cant bring things such as pressurized cans either so the charge on him would be the same as if someone brought a can of axe body spray and someone else put a lighter in a different compartment that caused it to burst. Guilty conscience is right though seeing as the person who died is actually his brother who was likely under the compartment that exploded.
God forbid any of those Air India passengers and/or crew were still alive when that plane broke up. Terrifying thought!!
They found a few who died of drowning but could have been unconscious as they drowned including a pregnant woman whose fetus was found to have been perfectly fine and died after the woman drowned. Absolutely terrifying.
they were
Yes, and what happened to the pilot who was seen crawling away!?
When / where did that happen?
@@jacknesty1691
Did you watch the video? They always tell when and where in the first half of the show
As a frequent traveller, way too many planes take off with my bags and with much stress and frustration without me so I think these baggage rules introduced after Air India aren't followed as much as people think
Hi I work at the airport :) Bags aren’t allowed to be checked in unless we know the passengers flying. When the plane is delayed, or u miss ur flight etc. Ur bag can fly w/o u bc our systems confirmed when and with who u’ll eventually fly. So yes the procedure & checks are done properly. Esp after 9/11 we have to.
The regulation states that Luggage cannot be checked in unless the passenger is checked in & confirmed to fly. It doesnt have to specifically be w/ a passenger onboard but it has to be confirmed that its checked in w/ a passenger who is or will eventually be flying :)
@@CaIiforniaL0VE Not sure about that. I was flying to Bolivia from Montreal and landed in Miami, in March 2002 (6 months after 9/11) and I had missed my plane with AA to LaPaz. I had checked-in my luggage and was waiting for a later flight to LaPaz (9 hr layover). I boarded the later flight and arrived in LaPaz early morning the next day. I was looking for my luggage on the carrousel and couldn't find it. I asked luggage service to help and a lady working in baggage claim walked me into a storage room where I found my luggage. It turns out that my luggage arrived before and without me on a previous flight. So, please explain what might have gone wrong?
@@ejcash7234 Well, you *did* eventually fly, then. So that's exactly what CaliforniaL0VE said - it doesn't necessarily have to be on the same flight as you are, but as long as you do fly...
@@ejcash7234 thats cos u were confirmed to fly, the reverse also happens where the passenger flies and their luggage would be sent on another flight behind it, what doesnt happen is a luggage flying with no passenger.
I’m not sure I can get on a plane again after watching all seasons of this show. Never really been fearful of flying. But now……
Me either, but they learned from the errors in the past. That should give us enough confidence. I fly three to four times a year with two being international flights 😅
@@jozydeford8513 use a bicycle🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Just remember that every time you get into a car, you’re facing a much, much higher risk than a plane. Your odds of dying in a plane crash are 1 in 1.2 million, compared to 1 in 5,000 for being in a fatal car accident. Plane accidents are incredibly rare and taken very seriously, all of the accidents you’ve heard about were learned from and are part of the reason why air travel is so safe today. Of course it still carries a risk, but so does any action you take in life.
I dunno. I think watching these shows me just how much effort this industry puts into stopping any and all causes of crashes.
Really interesting example was TACA Flight 110 where the engines flamed out because they flew through a thunderstorm with the engines at low throttle, and they were only tested at high throttle. Then more recently, Qantas flight 32 landed with one engine that refused to shut down. The firies tried blasting water down the front of the engine (while it was at idle) with one of their high volume water canons and the engine refused to shut down. Clearly plane engines' testing has been changed so that even at idle, they can handle some pretty torrential rain.
"747s don't just fall out of the sky"...but they do if they don't properly land.
This show is insanely well made and captivating, top production. I'm used to TH-camrs analyzing air disasters and while they do a great job with the tools they have, it doesn't come close to this level.
I had never heard of this 1st one. But O My God, How Horrific!!!😢
The world is full of crazies,and it's worse everyday.
That's terrible. I mean WHY take out all those innocent people???
@@trawlins396 They have no conscience. Cold blooded like a reptile.
I know for a fact that a US based airline took off with my bag and I wasn’t on the flight. I arrived early enough and checked in my bags and never made it to the terminal to board. It was an international flight and i was marked a ‘no show’.
They went in about how it was my fault and they may not be about to put me on another flight until well after the holidays.
I said okay and what not then asked for my checked in bags to go home and they were all looking at me. They eventually put me on another flight and I made the trip. Didn’t see my bags until reaching final destination.
I had that in 1980 -- I missed boarding. My bag went on anyway.
I think they’re supposed to have protocols for that - not flying your items if you aren’t on the flight (especially if it’s an international one)
In Australia, if a passenger fails to board on time, then the flight is delayed whilst that passenger's luggage is unloaded from the cargo hold. I've been on flights whilst that happens, the delays have sometimes taken ~15 minutes.
What year was this?
Hi I work at the airport checking in international flights :) When the plane is delayed, or u miss ur flight etc. Ur bag can fly w/o u bc we know u’ll eventually fly. So yes the procedure & checks are done properly. Esp after 9/11 we have to.
The regulation states that Luggage cannot be checked in unless the passenger is checked in & confirmed to fly. It doesnt have to specifically be w/ a passenger onboard but it has to be confirmed that its checked in w/ a passenger who is or will eventually be flying :) Like one of the commenters stated YES if ur not boarding ur bags were supposed to be offloaded but bc u stated u wanted another flight i believe ur bags were sent bc u wld eventually fly out & YES the no show & blaming u is bs! Im sorry they made u feel like that
negligent staff should be prosecuted
@@cbq6286 I agree!!!!
This
The woman that allowed the bag thru against policy felt bullied ?? Then call security....
I feel kind of sorry for that airline employee who allowed that bag with the bomb through when she broke the rule. She is responsible for all those deaths. She must feel so guilty and can never escape it. I wouldnt want to be in her shoes.
Feel sorry? Just do your job wouldn’t have happened she’s a pos
@@annikkianttila well she did it so she has to face the consequences
The smell tests for bottles is terrible. They could make a bottle with a divider & just fill the very top with the appropriate liquid! Smh
Not to mention that it's dangerous to the employee, and many people don't have a good sense of smell in the first place.
Probably one of the reasons why they don't do that anymore. Now we all complain about how small the limits are for bringing liquids onboard. Well, this is why that rule is there.
@@shellbacksclub so true! Didn't think of that!
This is why you can't bring the liquid more than 100 ml
Pacific Southwest Airlines Flight 1771 was estimated to have been traveling at 770 miles per hour (1,240 kilometers per hour) when it crashed into a hillside in the Santa Lucia Mountains near Paso Robles and Cayucos at 4:16 PM. The plane disintegrated instantly after hitting the rocky ground.
Wow, you figured out all by yourself that PSA 1771 'disintegrated instantly' after vertical impact with hard ground at 1240 km/hr? FFS, do you think everybody else needs to be TOLD this?
@@rocketeerPM2500 Are you going to cry?
THANK YOU ! I was just gonna google how fast it was going until I read ur comment ☺️
How can an employee who's been fired still keep their credentials?? Why weren't they forced to give them up at the time of termination? That's the biggest no-brainer ever.
Bc something like that never happened before. Sadly in Aviation everythings regulated after something happens. If we get fired now, we have to IMMEDIATELY turn in our security badge (I work at the airport) In our trainings we HAD to watch a video about this flight & had an examination about this exact incident, why we turn in our badges & how it changed regulations
This is alarming to know that with this incident and many like it that the cockpits were not reinforced BFORE 9/11 and such a tragedy could have been averted.
I think one is too many but as a business were there many incidents? I don’t know so what is “many”?
@@oldwomanranting From what I have seen on these channels-apparently.
Libya with Gaddafi sponsored so many terrorist hijacking of planes all over the world
Who brought the battery on board? Did they figure out who gave the athlete the gasoline?!
What I was wondering is why were there leads linked to battery post? Something very wrong here,, you never leave wires hooked to a battery post, They wanted it to spark!
It was probably an accident ...why did t smell the gasoline when they were prowling around in the Baggage carry below strolling & looking for stuff . ...they could have been bored!? Don't ask me.. ..
For the life of me, I'll never, ever, understand why passengers use aircrafts to transport all sorts of household products. Get to your home, then take your car, or the bus, or a cab, go to a store and buy your freaking cleaning products and go back home. Don't take an airplane to do basic shopping!
It still boggles my mind that 50 people will sit and do nothing to a man that has a 6-shot pistol -and has already used 2 shots.
It's probably because of fear.
some people freeze in that kind of situation
No one wants to catch the 3rd bullet
It takes courageous people, like those on 9/11 who took down one of the weaponized planes, they probably saved hundreds to thousands of people. Most are so fearful, they freeze. They want to do something but cannot. Others are courage filled and brave.
As others have noted, some people may freeze in fear, not wanting to catch the 3rd bullet.
Also, some people may be waiting to act, hoping for an unguarded minute on the gunman's part. And some people may freeze simply because they do not know what to do - they have been faced with a situation which they never expected to encounter, and need time to figure out a plan of action, but time may be something they do not have.
There are still issues with security at the airport. I have seen screeners just go through the motions while checking baggage. They don’t make a lot of money from TSA, but are better paid than security officers.
DEI at work at the nation's worst state.
@@louv3347 Yeah let's just blame all our problems on DIE instead of perhaps a lack of training or funds. Yup DEI all our problems come from DEI.
I agree & disagree lol. I work at the airport, so I agree theres loopholes to bypass security or the agent isnt that careful bc they’re overworked esp at my busy airport LAX. Where I disagree is tsa’s arent paid alot bc in california TSA’s make the highest amt of money in the airport after flight attendants & pilots. Im a check in agent & we make minimum compared to them.
The last thing you want at an airport is, a broken down X-ray machine.
1:08 Pacific Southwest Airlines Flight 1771
From Air Disasters: "I'm the Problem" (S11.E10)
17:31 Air India Flight 182
From Air Disasters:"Air India:"Explosive Evidence" (S5.E7)
27:59 Uni Air Flight 873
From Air Disasters:Explosive Touchdown (S20.E3)
Mayday Air Disaster - The Accident Files from Season 3 Episode 4 "Lapse in Security"
Traced to the breakdown of vital safety measures three horrific air disasters provoke fundamental changes to airport security procedures around the world a passenger plane is obliterated in the California Hills and investigators find a smoking gun in the wreckage a 747 explodes over the Atlantic and after a routine landing fire engulfs a commuter plane in Taiwan
David Burke could just move to another state with his family and with the remaining money. Starting a new life is better than committing THAT... Or he could just unalive his boss at night near his house, but not on a plane😢
That is why do not ever complain when the airport security gives you problems they may have just saved your life.
Flight 1771 crashed in San Luis Obispo County near Cayucos Dec 7, 1987. The force of the impact meant any remains were very small.
No one asked pal .. get a clue buster before this becomes a problem
It's such a shame and tragedy that terrible things have to happen to make people wake up and say, "Oh, maybe we should fix this."
A Nigerian DC-3 of OGIBUBUGUJU Airlines ( a domestic carrier) flying between the capital Lagos and Kaduna state crashed after the Captain had a stomach bacterial infection/food poisoning. He stood up in the cockpit and accidentally diarrhea on the central console causing a short circuit in the electrical system. The plane’s magnetos ( it was a piston engined radial job) failed and the aircraft made a forced landing in the jungle. INCREDIBLY!!!! Everyone survived.
Does anyone realize they say the same few words in every episode? Like “the worst disaster in…” or “the most devastating disaster in…” but then they change it up a little like “the worst accident in a decade” “the worst disaster in LA” etc etc
I been binging these the last few days and I was just thinking that 😂 every single one is the worst disaster in aviation history
@@vaniiboo SAME! I've noticed it too haha
They do it for dramatic effect
Mr ballin does the exact same thing every episode is the most horrific thing he's ever heard of lol
They really should mention that at the end of that sentence “at that time”
Internal sadness??? You stand your ground and do your job! Period!
@24:16 Then that employee that allowed that should be brought up on felony charges..... And so should whatever that is speaking.
The sheer incompetence of these nitwits.
Exactly!! And it's not like she followed procedure either....yet people defend her
Big mistake!!!Employees should be scanned too.
It’s also crazy how paper survives a crash that bad lmao just perfect for evidence.
on a flight I took two years ago from Denver to California, they let my bag fly to California before I did. It got there hours before I even left Denver🤦🏾♀️ I always think of Air India when I remember that
Air India hostess is wearing such a beautiful parandaa... Sarhi with a parandaa ... wonderful combination aho aho
Not long after the Air India disaster we flew Toronto to Gatwick with them. The security was horrendous, 3 security searches and the plane was gated right near the airport security fence well away from other aircraft. As we taxied out the RCMP drove along under each wing. They peeled away as we entering the runway.
I was in Frankfurt Germany once boarding a Lufthansa flight to Atlanta. There was a bomb threat called in and they put all the luggage on the ground and everyone had to point out their luggage and then board the plane and only then was your luggage loaded. This way if you had something that was going to blow up in your bags, you were damn sure going to have a front row seat to the event. Thankfully, nothing blew up but it's a sickening feeling knowing a bomb threat was called in on the plane you're ridingon. 😂😅
I’d miss my flight if I knew that!
Seems rather dubious if you ask me.
I work at LAX and theres a bomb threat every few months! 98% of the time its a false alarm but every time it happens its a hassle bc every bag, passenger, worker etc we ALL exit the airport & stand outside until its investigated thoroughly.
3:06 I thought pilots couldn't wear glasses. They had to have 20/20 vision 🤔
Military pilots, for airline you just need to use some corrective tools: glasses, lenses.
Being over 65 years old, it makes it very difficult to hear what is being said due to the LOUD music...
turn on CC
Stop being old
@@NateCooper111 eat one
I didn’t even notice there was music until reading this comment. You should turn on CC.
@@NateCooper111
If you’re lucky enough to get there, I’d like to ask your opinion then, but I’ll be long dead in my grave and I won’t get the chance. Lucky you.
How come they didn’t take Burkes employee ID when they fired him???
@@pattimaeda6097 he can make copy of ID ..
He can make a copy of ID
9:52 I like how, when they reacted the situation that the whole is about few years inches deep when, if a plane were to hit like that, it’d be 7 feet deep minimum
What's few years inches deep ! 😂
I worked for the company that handled Air India's cargo. We got a transfer of diplomatic cargo, and it was run out to the aircraft and loaded onto the last LD-3 going into the belly. The rest is history. Dip mail is MUST GO on the first available so as soon as we got it, it was in the jeep and off to Terminal 2 at Pearson. No one had a chance to look at it or even think about in Toronto.
Am I the only one who hates Accident Files?
I prefer the single crash videos because it’s more detailed.
You Might Be the Only One ... I'm Loving These Type Of Videos , I Haven't Seen any Car Accidents Episodes Tho , I'll Look Them Up Forsure...
@@eco_man_8652 This show is about airplane accidents. There's one episode about a train accident and one about a ferry, but that's it.
As for the original question, "hate" is a strong word. I prefer the single-accident episodes, but I certainly don't mind these episodes with thematically related accidents.
@@eco_man_8652 Except he is *NOT* the only one, there are hundreds of comments in relation to how people really do not like these types of documentaries. I, too, much prefer the single crash vids as they are much more detailed.
@@SuisfoniaTry Mentour Pilot.
@@windsofmarchjourneyperrytr2823 I already have them on my subscriber list and watch them pretty routinely :)
The motorcycle battery~wonder if it was identified by the place of purchase and who bought it.Was that checked out?
Thanks for the video which was really interesting!
23:37 the actress doing the role of the ticket agent is she the same one who did the role of one of the flight attendants on the episode documenting the disaster of Flight 4184
It's crazy how these things have to happen in order for changes to be made
Flight 1771 was here in the Hills off Highway 46......super sad day...
You can't bring bleach on planes anymore either
Trump wants it saved for Covid
Why was it ever allowed on a plane in the first place?
I just checked, no carry on or checked. Wow.
@@mntryjoseph1961people travel with brands they prefer for clothes washin. Allergies do exist ya know.
Do these Mayday episodes stage the crash sites for dramatic effect? Or are these the actual crash sites from archived footage?
Canadian Govt + Khalistan bombers = Air India 182. An alert was issued a month ago for this kinda of activity, but the OFC Canadian government ignored it. Only 1 person was jailed, and all the suspects remain free. The terrorist organization "Khalistan" which was behind this attack, currently thrives in Canada including in their parliament.
35:00 no surprises here.
27:27 hang on. last year i missed my flight and my checked bags got flown from Los Angelos to Albuquerque with out me. I had an air tag inside.
@@tld8102 Yes, I have had a similar situation, and after Air India 182 AND of course Lockerbie Scotland, this should Never be allowed.
What exactly do you need a motorcycle battery for on a plane, and old one at that? Some of you people don't need to fly, walking is probably a big enough challenge for you.
Why didnt the first plane in this story explode in a fireball when it hit the ground?? Was it out of fuel? You only see a big dust cloud. That is so very odd. And they say nothing was left not even the chairs ? Well what happened to the chairs? And why were the papers A OK? Just seems very strange. I dont get it. No fire apparently but yet no chairs. Where did they go? All of those chairs cannot just vanish!
37:32 "Sorry, sir, they don't pay me to think"
I will be sure to provide the link to this next time I hear that TSA is theater or someone giving them a hard time. Each story is so terribly sad 😢
That doesn't make sense, what was the note for, it seems like he passed it to him before just killing him.
This puts me off flying. 🕊️
The theory doesn't explain how gasoline got into the bleach bottle...wtf? Was there no real investigation into that? If that guy put gas in the bottle or knew there was gas in the bottle, he should have been at least somewhat legally responsible.
That's the things. They don't know if he knew. That why there was 6 separate trials.
@@Darthjacob-xg9sm that's so strange the urge to need 6 separate trials and not discover the simple fact that he brought 2 bottles of bleach with gasoline.
For me it's very clear: it was intended with someone else inside the plane.
It's plausible investigators doesn't know why or how, but the fact still remais ....
You are the only responsable to bring gasoline.
8:43 yeahhh, I don’t care what year this took place. If on a plane and some dude starts shooting. I’m not just sitting there waiting to die. Like if I’m going to die, it’ll be because of me, not anyone else
🎉🎉🎉 Does anyone happen to know if this first accident is the one that happened in Templeton, California?
Most of the locals around here (Templton) don’t believe me when I mention this.
Thank you for any help that you can provide.
Blessings,Carlos ✝️🙏❤️😊🇺🇸
That’s because it went down in Cayucos not Templeton. Same are though has to be the same one.
@@TheSjuris Thank you so Much for that information
Blessings,Carlos ✝️🙏❤️😊🇺🇸
I like this show but I really wish you would have labeled this right. I really prefer not to watch the compilation ones.
So dont watch it!! Stop complaining about FREE content!
@@trawlins396 Are you ok? How did my feedback trigger you so bad? I mean I even started with how much I like the show and then only said I wish they would title them correctly. I hope you get to feeling better.
We are so goofy with our false sense of security you guys realize when I worked for Everts as the person who just answered the phone... Employees like McDonald's employees we just go in the airport... We can go through any door... We have no reason to be in that airport in Anchorage Alaska but we can go through the airport and no issue whatsoever... I found myself in some places I'm like man if I had nefarious intentions... We're not going to stop people who are motivated all we are doing is inconveniencing ourselves for false sense of security
I was working as ground personal in two airports - a small one and big one. In big airport there is a separate entrance wirh scanner and so on for the agents but in small one we had to use the same as passangers. The passangers are rude, the most of them make a drama if the employees want to go without standing in line, even wirhout us they can't to on the board. In big airport there was once the situation that young filmmaker group decided to spare money and take the equipment as baggage on the same flights. They have a small diesel generator with some diesel in! And some big Li-accumulators also which exeeded the allowed volume. The group went from plead to threaten. It is crazy how the people behave in the airport.
That Taiwanese incident was like something you would see in a FINAL DESTINATION movie.
Did the athlete ever say WHY he had gasoline in bleach bottles?
Good question
Okay, I know this is a serious documentary, but I just can't ignore how *extremely stock-sounding* those gunshots are.
Sobering and very sad. 😢
With the uni flight, how and who brought the motorcycle battery on the plane?
Good question and more important at all:
Why there were toguether: gasoline and battery?
You’d be surprised that security is still not that tight at airports in regards to their employees. As someone who used to work in the ramp, at a smaller city airport, we didn’t have to go through security. I think some ramp agents didn’t have to go through security in larger airports either because a few years ago, ramp agents out of ATL were smuggling guns on Delta flights.
I work at LAX as a check in agent for an Airline. Theres a “secret passageway” for employees to use that bypasses TSA. Only Check in agents are allowed to use this passage w/ a security badge bc we don’t fly with passengers we check them in and board our flights.
Most of us use this path bc LAX is extremely busy & its a hassle for us to wait in long TSA lines, especially when we need to board on time. Im just now realizing that this isn’t a good thing, bc even though were thoroughly screened to get a job like this, u never know whose on the verge of “snapping” & doing something as horrific as this.
When your time is up,everything goes crazy....I mean how dd that boss ignore the presence of Burke after he had just fired him?
24:51 how could an x ray machine break down?
Look at how big the seats used to be.
Who tf brings gasoline in a bleach bottle and a motorcycle battery on a plane? It was obviously on purpose.
22:42 5 engines? Animation glitch
I hope the ticket agent from the second story was fired.
Yeah, I was wondering what happened to her and I hope she was fired atleast
Nope...n she asks for sympathy even today 😂 ppl actually feel sorry for her, I can't believe it
"What is the problem?- "I am the problem." Chills 🥶
im thankful for the tedious security check knowing my chances of landing alive is higher
As for the gasoline, if it was leaking anywhere near as much as depicted, how would passengers and crew not smell that? That episode leaves nothing but unanswered questions.
Its insane how easy it was to hijack a plane
I can't help but comment out of curiosity. Where are the bodies and the chairs or parts of the plane? Did they burn because of the impact? Wouldn't the chairs be made of metal parts though? Was the impact really that bad? When that Oceangate submarine collapsed there were so many engineers that made videos calculating the Physics forces that were involved and gave us numbers. I wish that was more common but included in videos like this, not the calculation but at least things like what speed the plane could be travelling/falling at for such kind of an impact on metal parts and flesh and bones.