@@KingjamesAV1611 it is sad that you could be that ignorant. I would beg you to watch Sam Gipp discussing this with Daniel wallace and major Bible translators. They destroy him.
I can attest to his "stupid" beliefs. I went from NIV, to NASB to ESV and FINALLY to the only TRUE word of God the KJV. Praise God. This took 30 years but, by God's grace, I'm there.
thank you for your work and dedication. Pastor I really learnd allot pls continue this ministry and may God bless you in all that you do thank you ps pardon for the my spealing i know it sucks
Its pretty shocking how many red herrings are required to avoid the actual content of the text. It would stand to read that a Biblical position on the KJV would have some sort of textual evidence from the... you know... text. Not even the King James Version of the Bible claims what Sam Gipp claims for it. Again, none of this come from any content that is deribed from the text of scripture. Astonishing that anyone falls for this...
This guy isn't fluent in Greek or Hebrew. Your point is correct, but the fact he's not educated in the original languages is why he doesn't refer to the original text
@@teamrecon2685 Yes, I'm aware. He's spoken at my church before. He's not to be taken seriously. Ontologically, he is so unsound with his reasoning that you do not need to follow anything about the languages to know he is full of it.
I was reading Acts chapter 6 a few hours ago.... just a coincidence I'm sure. I was just thinking that this was the best time I've spent in a while... another one I'm sure. What a blessing how God confirms things like that. : )
We do textual criticism because we want to know what the apostles originally wrote. We want to know what the Bible says, not what a later scribe added as commentary. The critical text of the New Testament is solid. People get saved while reading "new versions" all the time.
ANYONE who hasn't read Dr Gipp's salient books, The Answer Book, and The Understandable History of the Bible, doesn't have enough knowledge of this subject to even give a half intelligent comment. And I'll add to the necessary works Riplinger's books, which children like "Truth Seeker" couldn't handle; and Ruckman's book, "Errors in the King James Bible". Some of us don't merely have opinions, we've done our homework.
6:30. Law of first mention is not a thing. Gipp says The first time the Bible mentioned something is how God views it there after… At six minutes and 30 seconds he mentions the serpent from Genesis chapter 3. But what about the image of the bronze serpent that the Israelites looked to for healing in the time of Moses? In this case the serpent pictured / foreshadowed Christ on the cross. Gipp is a pompous fool
@@DavidBrown-tf7uv ..... but you have to remember that the Bible says, cursed is everyone that hangeth on a tree. (Galatians 3:13) Christ was made a curse for us when he was on that cross...... and it just so happens that the first time the word "cursed" shows up in the KJV is in Genesis 3 when dealing with the SERPENT. So Gipp is right on with his assessment, I hope you come around to the idea of "first mentions". Once you start studying them out, they will blow your mind. 🤯
28:37 - "Philo had no problem yanking 1 John 5:7 out of the passage" Philo died in 50 A.D., how was he suppose to tamper with 1 John when 1 John wasn't written until approximately 90 A.D. Folks, don't be fooled by misleading information that has holes in its historical presentation.
Jason Briski Gipp says he has read over a hundred books on the KJB issue. How many have you read?? If you're so much wiser than Dr. gipp why don't you call him out and debate him?? Lol. Easier to take potshots on YT,.. I know.
@Falcon Let's see. Gipps read a hundred books on the issue. DOGGEDLY devouring all the best information, from obviously varied sources; but he " can't be bothered with facts..." and that's not a potshot?? Maybe I should go look up the definition. I suppose I could be confused, but it looks a lot like a potshot to me. How many books has the shotter of pots read? None you say?? Just a few videos on TH-cam?😂😂😂
@Falcon You've looked over the Bibliography of Dr. Gipps books of course right? No, you havent, have you. You sound,...young, dumb, and maybe a little drunk?? Lol. Why don't you debate Dr. Gipp or at least posit an understandable and reasonable argument, not the rude potshots you seem bent on making everyone read. Go read Cotton patch version for all I care if you want to. Most people are ivnorant of Satan's Wiles, as you sir seem hell-bent on proving. When it comes down to it, he's your brother isn't he? Yes, and you will be judged for how well you loved him. You're kinda sucking at it so far my humble opinion.
I. Have read Philo for many years. Philo was the head of the largest synagogue outside of Jerusalem. (The synagogue in Alexander Egypt) His brother was the head assistant priest to the high priest in Jerusalem and one of the chief financiers of Herod’s temple. He never put himself out to be a Christian of any dirt. He Mostly wrote to the Grecian world trying to convince them that MOSES WAS THE LOGOS that the Greeks spoke of. It was his trip to Rome which gave the present world a unique picture of the persecution of Christians who he lit up his garden with and insisted in taking Philo and the other Jewish elders of Alexandria through. At that time Philo has come to request relief from the Egyptian persecution of Jews through Nero. He decided after seeing what Nero was doing to Christians to drop the matter and ho back to Alexandria Egypt and tide out the persecution lest, “they treat us like these Christians.” Nero was a Greco-Philo so Philo got no sympathy there, though Nero’s wife very much liked jews and admired their religious practice. Much of Philo’s writing was an expository rendition of the days of creation. . He was vastly popular in the early church, as many believers read his writings. He wrote volumes of intricate writing, and though NOT a Christian he was “Christian friendly. Much of what dr Gipp has said is the result of reading Philo’s critics and not Philo’s writings themselves. So I can’t really hold him accountable for misunderstanding some if those basics that Philo believed or wrote. His writing is a multi years project to wade through so it is a long project and easier to go by the writings of other “scholars” on Philo than his actual writings, though that often leaves you with less than a Cliff’s Notes version of his writings. Yes many more hours could be undertaken to read but the unfortunate thing in this flesh is that we are limited in what we even have time to study here in this earth. So, we await that heavenly library being opened to us where the books will be opened and we will have eternity to learn For now don’t be so harsh on a couple mistakes a person might make on their scholarship as we are ALL SINNERS and have all fallen short of the glory of God and continue to fall short.
He said that god left the church in Jerusalem and that the church in Antioch had to send relief to that church-in Jerusalem - as if God left them. However he didn’t read verse 28 where it said that there was a dearth throughout all the world , why didn’t he read that verse? , did God leave the world? acts 11:26, 29 but he skipped 28 , I read my Bible , amen amen amen as Ruck would say.
Sadly, having the right Bible does not ensure one will have sound doctrine. It is incredible to experience but heretics can read a verse whose meaning is plain and yet the English bounces off of them and they refuse to hear it. Gipp is a case in point. He worships a God who lacks the power to control the fate of his creatures or creation and is reduced to offering salvation in hopes someone may will and work to accept it. Today's situation just proves the truth of God's Word, they have a form of godliness but deny the power thereof. From such turn away.
10/22/2024 The problem is most don't "study to show thyself approved" nor "line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little, there a little". They scan over scripture and expect that they'll get all that's in there like they have a photographic memory along with Sherlock Holmes level of deduction. We aren't taught to think, we assume to meditate on scripture is to blank out our minds like Eastern mysticism and not as the Bible teaches for us to ponder or chew up the verses in our mind, delving into what it means from God's context--as found in the scriptures. We are weak-minded people by design.
Declaring that non-KJV versions are "trash" is the mark of a foolish heretic. Note that non-KJVO people like me NEVER say that the KJV is a bad translation, corrupt or that it hasn't been used greatly by God but this is nonsense. Bible scholars take ALL the manuscripts available and translate in the light of the findings - remember too that the KJV was translated by clerical Anglicans who read into the English text their church practices, this is not WRONG but you have to take it into account. Which KJVO people never acknowledge, nor that the KJV has been substantially revised since its first edition, not that it is based on previous English version bibles.
@@terryford6152 The question is whether the final authority can be obtained from store and you said yes. And then you said no. This is the kind of mental deficiency that must be avoided.
The only ones who spue out the devils lies. Are the KJV only cult that Satan has raised also the KJV is not the true Bible. Just an imperfect uninspired archaic translation. More wilful ignorance from a KJV only heretic.
The trinity is not biblical. The trinity comes from pagan Egypt and Catholicism followed suit. The Godhead is biblical. Colossians 2:8-9 We are made in God's image. God is the soul Jesus is the body Holy Spirit is the Spirit/Ruach that breathed into our nostrils to "become" a living soul. We each have A soul A body A Spirit/Ruach Yet we are each "ONE" individual We have 3 parts. We are not 3 persons. God is 3 parts, which consists of soul, body, Spirit/Ruach God is not 3 persons as Catholicism teaches. Catholicism teaches 3 gods in one. (1) God the father (2) God the son (3) God the spirit That makes 3 gods, not one God with 3 parts. And no, this is not modalism. It is the Godhead of Colossians 2:8-9.
Hmm, vanity. God is a title that is shared between the three of them, not three different Gods.. and there are plenty of places in scripture that reveals the trinity. You don’t need 1John 5:7 for that lol
That his heart turn not away , Duet 17:17 , Solomon’ s heart was turned away and would turn away , that’s why The Lord appeared to him twice. David multiplied wives also , what is the point here that he’s not wise? Or wasn’t wise ? Yes I get the gist about Alexandria and Antioch but those are some strange points when it comes to Solomon.
Sam Gipp? One of the many reasons I reject the KJV only heresy. Other reasons, Gail Riplinger, Will Kinney, Steven Anderson, Gene Kim. I almost forgot Robert Breaker, and Mike Hoggard. David W Daniels anything from chick tracts
@@terryford6152 Not an argument. Final authority is liberty, because then you can actually know what is going on and what to do. When there is no final authority, nobody can know what to do, so you have to just sit there with your thumb up your ass.
1Ki 3:5 In Gibeon the LORD appeared to Solomon in a dream by night: and God said, Ask what I shall give thee. 1Ki 3:6 And Solomon said, Thou hast shewed unto thy servant David my father great mercy, according as he walked before thee in truth, and in righteousness, and in uprightness of heart with thee; and thou hast kept for him this great kindness, that thou hast given him a son to sit on his throne, as it is this day. 1Ki 3:7 And now, O LORD my God, thou hast made thy servant king instead of David my father: and I am but a little child: I know not how to go out or come in. 1Ki 3:8 And thy servant is in the midst of thy people which thou hast chosen, a great people, that cannot be numbered nor counted for multitude. 1Ki 3:9 Give therefore thy servant an understanding heart to judge thy people, that I may discern between good and bad: for who is able to judge this thy so great a people? 1Ki 3:10 And the speech pleased the Lord, that Solomon had asked this thing. 1Ki 3:11 And God said unto him, Because thou hast asked this thing, and hast not asked for thyself long life; neither hast asked riches for thyself, nor hast asked the life of thine enemies; but hast asked for thyself understanding to discern judgment; 1Ki 3:12 Behold, I have done according to thy words: lo, I have given thee a wise and an understanding heart; so that there was none like thee before thee, neither after thee shall any arise like unto thee. 1Ki 3:13 And I have also given thee that which thou hast not asked, both riches, and honour: so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy days. the reason Solomon had all that gold and silver was from God blessing him, in that he asked for wisdom, the thing he did not ask for were given to him as well.
8:33. If Egypt is used to reference generally the idea of evil or corruption in the Bible… Which it does to some degree… Then why did the sinless son of God go there shortly after he was born?
The name Jesus is the hellenized version of Joshua, the septuagunt writes iesous in the book Joshua. The septuagunt comes from Alexandria. So, doesn't that mean that the name Jesus comes from Egypt?
9:26!!!!!!! Is this man really saying that anyone who goes to Egypt today for a recreational visit will be treated the way that people were treated 4 to 5000 years ago? The idiocy of this man seems to know no end
Anyone who falls for this is doing themselves a great disservice. KJVO is not defensible, I use the KJV but I use several others as well. Edit: let me add my compliments to the persons responsible for producing the video.
For those of us that don’t adhere to the King James Only idea, it is not because we don’t believe that the KJV is the word of God, or that we are attacking it in any way. We just don’t follow the cult-like thinking that it was inspired the same way the original writers were inspired, and that all other translations are be default corrupt. Some are, many are not. Gipp has wasted his life preaching a message of the supremacy of a mere translation of the Scriptures in a language that most of the planet doesn’t even speak, at the expense of preaching salvation and the forgiveness of sins through Christ alone.
The primary problem with these new versions is they make you the judge of God’s Word, not God’s Word being the judge of you.
How do the new more accurate modern translations cause us to judge God. You sound as deluded as false teacher and KJV only cultist Sam Gipp.
How could Faith NOT be practice?
Excellent teaching. Great layout on what value exists historically in the Word
No! It's entirely wrong. He doesn't understand the manuscript history at all.
@@jwatson181 .....he nailed it, great teaching!! 🙌
@@KingjamesAV1611 it is sad that you could be that ignorant. I would beg you to watch Sam Gipp discussing this with Daniel wallace and major Bible translators. They destroy him.
@@jwatson181
How can I see that debate you speak of where they destroy Gibbs? Can you share link?
@@chaulzebrown9884 john ankerberg show my friend. You can watch it your self.
I can attest to his "stupid" beliefs. I went from NIV, to NASB to ESV and FINALLY to the only TRUE word of God the KJV. Praise God. This took 30 years but, by God's grace, I'm there.
Is this church in portland Oregon or around that area?
Edit: 1:01:25 port cities inland on the columbia river.
God's Word Baptist in Ridgefield Washington... video taken about 15 years ago...
@@jimnesbitt8581 oh ok cool.
thank you for your work and dedication. Pastor I really learnd allot pls continue this ministry and may God bless you in all that you do thank you
ps pardon for the my spealing i know it sucks
Its pretty shocking how many red herrings are required to avoid the actual content of the text. It would stand to read that a Biblical position on the KJV would have some sort of textual evidence from the... you know... text. Not even the King James Version of the Bible claims what Sam Gipp claims for it. Again, none of this come from any content that is deribed from the text of scripture. Astonishing that anyone falls for this...
This guy isn't fluent in Greek or Hebrew. Your point is correct, but the fact he's not educated in the original languages is why he doesn't refer to the original text
@@teamrecon2685 Yes, I'm aware. He's spoken at my church before. He's not to be taken seriously. Ontologically, he is so unsound with his reasoning that you do not need to follow anything about the languages to know he is full of it.
Well researched.Thank you
I was reading Acts chapter 6 a few hours ago.... just a coincidence I'm sure. I was just thinking that this was the best time I've spent in a while... another one I'm sure. What a blessing how God confirms things like that. : )
It may he the devil. He is the father of lies.
We do textual criticism because we want to know what the apostles originally wrote. We want to know what the Bible says, not what a later scribe added as commentary. The critical text of the New Testament is solid. People get saved while reading "new versions" all the time.
ANYONE who hasn't read Dr Gipp's salient books, The Answer Book, and The Understandable History of the Bible, doesn't have enough knowledge of this subject to even give a half intelligent comment. And I'll add to the necessary works Riplinger's books, which children like "Truth Seeker" couldn't handle; and Ruckman's book, "Errors in the King James Bible". Some of us don't merely have opinions, we've done our homework.
Ayyyyem amen-amen-amen brother! That's good stuff.
I would also add Dr. James Sightler's books to the list.
6:30. Law of first mention is not a thing. Gipp says The first time the Bible mentioned something is how God views it there after… At six minutes and 30 seconds he mentions the serpent from Genesis chapter 3. But what about the image of the bronze serpent that the Israelites looked to for healing in the time of Moses? In this case the serpent pictured / foreshadowed Christ on the cross. Gipp is a pompous fool
@@DavidBrown-tf7uv ..... but you have to remember that the Bible says, cursed is everyone that hangeth on a tree. (Galatians 3:13) Christ was made a curse for us when he was on that cross...... and it just so happens that the first time the word "cursed" shows up in the KJV is in Genesis 3 when dealing with the SERPENT. So Gipp is right on with his assessment, I hope you come around to the idea of "first mentions". Once you start studying them out, they will blow your mind. 🤯
28:37 - "Philo had no problem yanking 1 John 5:7 out of the passage"
Philo died in 50 A.D., how was he suppose to tamper with 1 John when 1 John wasn't written until approximately 90 A.D.
Folks, don't be fooled by misleading information that has holes in its historical presentation.
Mr. Gipp can't be bothered with annoying minutiae like facts
Jason Briski Gipp says he has read over a hundred books on the KJB issue. How many have you read?? If you're so much wiser than Dr. gipp why don't you call him out and debate him?? Lol. Easier to take potshots on YT,.. I know.
@Falcon Let's see. Gipps read a hundred books on the issue. DOGGEDLY devouring all the best information, from obviously varied sources; but he " can't be bothered with facts..." and that's not a potshot?? Maybe I should go look up the definition. I suppose I could be confused, but it looks a lot like a potshot to me.
How many books has the shotter of pots read? None you say?? Just a few videos on TH-cam?😂😂😂
@Falcon You've looked over the Bibliography of Dr. Gipps books of course right? No, you havent, have you. You sound,...young, dumb, and maybe a little drunk?? Lol. Why don't you debate Dr. Gipp or at least posit an understandable and reasonable argument, not the rude potshots you seem bent on making everyone read. Go read Cotton patch version for all I care if you want to. Most people are ivnorant of Satan's Wiles, as you sir seem hell-bent on proving. When it comes down to it, he's your brother isn't he? Yes, and you will be judged for how well you loved him.
You're kinda sucking at it so far my humble opinion.
I. Have read Philo for many years. Philo was the head of the largest synagogue outside of Jerusalem. (The synagogue in Alexander Egypt) His brother was the head assistant priest to the high priest in Jerusalem and one of the chief financiers of Herod’s temple.
He never put himself out to be a Christian of any dirt. He Mostly wrote to the Grecian world trying to convince them that MOSES WAS THE LOGOS that the Greeks spoke of.
It was his trip to Rome which gave the present world a unique picture of the persecution of Christians who he lit up his garden with and insisted in taking Philo and the other Jewish elders of Alexandria through.
At that time Philo has come to request relief from the Egyptian persecution of Jews through Nero. He decided after seeing what Nero was doing to Christians to drop the matter and ho back to Alexandria Egypt and tide out the persecution lest, “they treat us like these Christians.”
Nero was a Greco-Philo so Philo got no sympathy there, though Nero’s wife very much liked jews and admired their religious practice.
Much of Philo’s writing was an expository rendition of the days of creation. . He was vastly popular in the early church, as many believers read his writings.
He wrote volumes of intricate writing, and though NOT a Christian he was “Christian friendly.
Much of what dr Gipp has said is the result of reading Philo’s critics and not Philo’s writings themselves.
So I can’t really hold him accountable for misunderstanding some if those basics that Philo believed or wrote.
His writing is a multi years project to wade through so it is a long project and easier to go by the writings of other “scholars” on Philo than his actual writings, though that often leaves you with less than a Cliff’s Notes version of his writings.
Yes many more hours could be undertaken to read but the unfortunate thing in this flesh is that we are limited in what we even have time to study here in this earth.
So, we await that heavenly library being opened to us where the books will be opened and we will have eternity to learn
For now don’t be so harsh on a couple mistakes a person might make on their scholarship as we are ALL SINNERS and have all fallen short of the glory of God and continue to fall short.
He said that god left the church in Jerusalem and that the church in Antioch had to send relief to that church-in Jerusalem - as if God left them. However he didn’t read verse 28 where it said that there was a dearth throughout all the world , why didn’t he read that verse? , did God leave the world? acts 11:26, 29 but he skipped 28 , I read my Bible , amen amen amen as Ruck would say.
Preach it brother!
Sadly, having the right Bible does not ensure one will have sound doctrine. It is incredible to experience but heretics can read a verse whose meaning is plain and yet the English bounces off of them and they refuse to hear it. Gipp is a case in point. He worships a God who lacks the power to control the fate of his creatures or creation and is reduced to offering salvation in hopes someone may will and work to accept it. Today's situation just proves the truth of God's Word, they have a form of godliness but deny the power thereof. From such turn away.
10/22/2024 The problem is most don't "study to show thyself approved" nor "line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little, there a little". They scan over scripture and expect that they'll get all that's in there like they have a photographic memory along with Sherlock Holmes level of deduction. We aren't taught to think, we assume to meditate on scripture is to blank out our minds like Eastern mysticism and not as the Bible teaches for us to ponder or chew up the verses in our mind, delving into what it means from God's context--as found in the scriptures. We are weak-minded people by design.
Declaring that non-KJV versions are "trash" is the mark of a foolish heretic. Note that non-KJVO people like me NEVER say that the KJV is a bad translation, corrupt or that it hasn't been used greatly by God but this is nonsense. Bible scholars take ALL the manuscripts available and translate in the light of the findings - remember too that the KJV was translated by clerical Anglicans who read into the English text their church practices, this is not WRONG but you have to take it into account. Which KJVO people never acknowledge, nor that the KJV has been substantially revised since its first edition, not that it is based on previous English version bibles.
We will stick to the true Bible, the KJB, no matter what the devil's scholars spue up.
@@terryford6152
Do you have a final authority, that a person could obtain from a store or a publisher?
@@terryford6152
The question is whether the final authority can be obtained from store and you said yes. And then you said no. This is the kind of mental deficiency that must be avoided.
The only ones who spue out the devils lies. Are the KJV only cult that Satan has raised also the KJV is not the true Bible. Just an imperfect uninspired archaic translation. More wilful ignorance from a KJV only heretic.
@@tallswede80Do you have a perfect translation of the Bible? If so what language is it in? Because there is not one in English
The trinity is not biblical. The trinity comes from pagan Egypt and Catholicism followed suit.
The Godhead is biblical.
Colossians 2:8-9
We are made in God's image.
God is the soul
Jesus is the body
Holy Spirit is the Spirit/Ruach that breathed into our nostrils to "become" a living soul.
We each have
A soul
A body
A Spirit/Ruach
Yet we are each "ONE" individual We have 3 parts. We are not 3 persons.
God is 3 parts, which consists of soul, body, Spirit/Ruach
God is not 3 persons as Catholicism teaches. Catholicism teaches 3 gods in one.
(1) God the father
(2) God the son
(3) God the spirit
That makes 3 gods, not one God with 3 parts.
And no, this is not modalism. It is the Godhead of Colossians 2:8-9.
Hmm, vanity. God is a title that is shared between the three of them, not three different Gods.. and there are plenty of places in scripture that reveals the trinity. You don’t need 1John 5:7 for that lol
@@gracefellowship9494 There is only One God with 3 parts, consisting of soul, body, and Spirit. There are not 3 persons of a pagan trinity.
Nice. Correct.
That his heart turn not away , Duet 17:17 , Solomon’ s heart was turned away and would turn away , that’s why The Lord appeared to him twice. David multiplied wives also , what is the point here that he’s not wise? Or wasn’t wise ? Yes I get the gist about Alexandria and Antioch but those are some strange points when it comes to Solomon.
Sam Gipp? One of the many reasons I reject the KJV only heresy. Other reasons, Gail Riplinger, Will Kinney, Steven Anderson, Gene Kim. I almost forgot Robert Breaker, and Mike Hoggard. David W Daniels anything from chick tracts
If God hated egypt so much then why did he send Joseph and Mary there when Jesus was a child ?
It’s not that God hated Egypt it’s what Egypt was representative, which was RELIGIOUS BONDAGE.
it says in verse 15 of matthew 2. It says he told him to go to Egypt so that he could then tell him to get the hell out of egypt.
@@terryford6152
Not an argument. Final authority is liberty, because then you can actually know what is going on and what to do. When there is no final authority, nobody can know what to do, so you have to just sit there with your thumb up your ass.
He brought his Son out of Egypt. It was a reflection of Moses leading people out of Isarel.
1Ki 3:5 In Gibeon the LORD appeared to Solomon in a dream by night: and God said, Ask what I shall give thee.
1Ki 3:6 And Solomon said, Thou hast shewed unto thy servant David my father great mercy, according as he walked before thee in truth, and in righteousness, and in uprightness of heart with thee; and thou hast kept for him this great kindness, that thou hast given him a son to sit on his throne, as it is this day.
1Ki 3:7 And now, O LORD my God, thou hast made thy servant king instead of David my father: and I am but a little child: I know not how to go out or come in.
1Ki 3:8 And thy servant is in the midst of thy people which thou hast chosen, a great people, that cannot be numbered nor counted for multitude.
1Ki 3:9 Give therefore thy servant an understanding heart to judge thy people, that I may discern between good and bad: for who is able to judge this thy so great a people?
1Ki 3:10 And the speech pleased the Lord, that Solomon had asked this thing.
1Ki 3:11 And God said unto him, Because thou hast asked this thing, and hast not asked for thyself long life; neither hast asked riches for thyself, nor hast asked the life of thine enemies; but hast asked for thyself understanding to discern judgment;
1Ki 3:12 Behold, I have done according to thy words: lo, I have given thee a wise and an understanding heart; so that there was none like thee before thee, neither after thee shall any arise like unto thee.
1Ki 3:13 And I have also given thee that which thou hast not asked, both riches, and honour: so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy days.
the reason Solomon had all that gold and silver was from God blessing him, in that he asked for wisdom, the thing he did not ask for were given to him as well.
8:33. If Egypt is used to reference generally the idea of evil or corruption in the Bible… Which it does to some degree… Then why did the sinless son of God go there shortly after he was born?
He brought his Son out of Egypt.
The name Jesus is the hellenized version of Joshua, the septuagunt writes iesous in the book Joshua. The septuagunt comes from Alexandria. So, doesn't that mean that the name Jesus comes from Egypt?
I do believe Dr.Gipp has a throat problem!
9:26!!!!!!! Is this man really saying that anyone who goes to Egypt today for a recreational visit will be treated the way that people were treated 4 to 5000 years ago? The idiocy of this man seems to know no end
Anyone who falls for this is doing themselves a great disservice. KJVO is not defensible, I use the KJV but I use several others as well. Edit: let me add my compliments to the persons responsible for producing the video.
Hey Gipp. No one who does not believe the KJV in the ONLY word of God says that it’s NOT the word of God. You are manufacturing your enemy.
For those of us that don’t adhere to the King James Only idea, it is not because we don’t believe that the KJV is the word of God, or that we are attacking it in any way. We just don’t follow the cult-like thinking that it was inspired the same way the original writers were inspired, and that all other translations are be default corrupt. Some are, many are not.
Gipp has wasted his life preaching a message of the supremacy of a mere translation of the Scriptures in a language that most of the planet doesn’t even speak, at the expense of preaching salvation and the forgiveness of sins through Christ alone.