2000 Ford Explorer Into 2001 Mercedes-Benz E 320 Estate 90° Side Crash Test (ECE 96/27/EC - 45 Km/h)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 พ.ย. 2024
- A 50 Km/h (31 Mph) 90° Side impact performed by Transport Canada at PMG Technologies in Blainville, Quebec on 07/10/2001. The research procedures used are referred to the PMG procedure 214 V5 dated June 10th 1999 and the ECE procedure, directive 96/27/EC dated May 20th 1996. The Explorer's occupants are Hybrid III 5th Percentile Female dummies, the E 320's occupants are SID-IIs 5th Percentile Female dummies.This test features a 2000 Ford Explorer impacting a 2001 Mercedes-Benz E-Class (W210 - E 320) Estate at a 90° centered on its b-pillar.
E 320 Occupants:
Driver - Rear Passenger
HIC 1266** - 96
**Exceeds FMVSS Limit of 1000.
Explorer Occupants:
Driver - Passenger
HIC 79 - 49
Chest G's 18 - 17
Femur Loads (L/R - N) 536/1669 - 914/1088
![PASULOL รามเกียรติ์ ตอนที่ 4 นนทกพบรัก [Ramakien Ep.4: Nonthok in love]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tMUQgmZzf_A/mqdefault.jpg)
Excuse me Mr. Exploder, but can you back up and do it again, please? I have my curtain air bag down now.
I'm glad we don't have so many of these trucks here in Europe, they are unforgivingly stiff, hits too high, are too heavy, and the older ones are not compatible with ordinary cars' frontal crumble zone. Lots of unnecessary death and suffering on the american roads...
Did you forget to mention no one can drive in America - American
You keep your smart cars, we will be riding our trucks of FREEDOM 🦅🇺🇸
(yes, this is a joke if you can not tell)
And Canadian roads, too! We have those monsters, too!
Uh oh, looks like the transmission slipped again and Richie crashed into Carmela. He's lucky he didn't get run over himself.
LOL
Lmaooo
explorer almost can drive home and probably moderate to severe injury to the occupants of the mercedes
The explorer driver can transport the injured occupants to the emergency room
until the rear tire explotes on the highway causing to rollover and tearing apart everybody inside
@@VkRmotorsport Except for the rollover issue (which can be easily fixed if you lower it a bit), that truck is extremely safe. Someone walked away from a head on with a semi on a forum many years ago. The non-rollover death rate is extremely low according to stats. And 90% of the rollovers were from bad tires or terrible driving.
Well that Mercedes really didn’t hold up nor protect the occupants well.
It’s a 2000 with side airbags, at least it’s sometuing
Sir have you seen how bad cars did in 2000
This is an E Class designed in 1996!
@@Kalebsusername Actually a 1996 Mercedes, designed in 1990-1991 tops.
@@legioner9 and started in 1988
I have the same car. It's very comfortable but not stiff enough. The newer generations are safer but less comfortable. If you're looking for a very strong car, especially for side collisions, consider buying a CLS class; it's practically a tank. Also, if the car crumples during an accident, it's not always a bad thing. The design uses the momentum to absorb the impact, preventing high G-forces from harming your brain. Consider the cars from the '60s or '80s: the frames might remain intact, but the occupants often didn't survive. The same can happen for the Ford. it did not deploy airbag but the driver kissed the steering wheel.
Without a doubt, I would much rather be in the Explorer than the MB. That 320 bent like a pretzel!
This why everybody's buying SYVs and not cars .
SUV?
The they should have slammed the ford explorer in the side of a ford focus or ford Fiesta and it would have completely sliced those cars in half because ford actually makes crappy cars very unsafe look at how the fiesta, focus fail crash test miserably and ford explorer fails roll over test miserably
And now let's compare the explorer roof to the M class w163 and see who wins😂😂😂. But I agree the w210 is not a very safe car
Merc is downgrade E class on W210, this car probably the most poor quality Merc car ever
Imagine if the Merc was hit by a Chevy Suburban
(I daily drive a 97 E420)
I cant imagine Stalin driving a Chevy suburban xD
I use to have an 01 suburban and mannnn I miss it . I want another 😌
Stalin likes the M119.
That' in real terms is a very unlikely accident.
The side airbag and the curtain airbag deployed late.
They should have used a 1997 mercedes g wagon or a mercedes ml in this crash test they would have totaled completely end the Ford explorer
S 210 IS early 90 design.
👌👍
The best or nothing. Not.
It's a 2001 it did fine
1996 design
@sf they started to sell w210 in - 96, butt it was designed a lot earlier...
I bet any car from this year would’ve had the same result except Volvo maybe it would’ve done better
Deads?
Terrible for a Mercedes and add to the list the w202
A 99 C280 (w202) saved my life. I was tboned by a honda doing 50 mph.. I only came out with a scratch. The honda was shaped like a C and everyone was severely injured.
@@polarynrs2064 yep you said 99 , for the facelift models w202 safety improved quickly but for 1994-1996 safety is terrible.