Video 10: Reading Cases Effectively
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024
- In this Introduction to Law video, we look at how to read cases efficiently and effectively. Cases follow a pattern, which can be decoded to enable them to be read with much less effort.
Every law student at some point in their degree has listened to your videos for better grasp over concepts.
I just wanted to firmly thank you for your videos - you made understanding law so easy!
You are so welcome!
Indeed
We all owe you for producing such an outstanding presentation.
thank you so much for this video, it really helps with preparing my case briefs as a first-year student :)
Glad it was helpful!
Hi @anthonymarinac fantastic content.... you have taken what could be an extremely difficult concept to grasp and broken it down to its nuts and bolts again.....The title of "The Great Explainer" was already taken (Richard Feyman RIP) however I think his spirit is still alive. Gratias tibi ago
Gosh Daniel, that is very high praise. Thank you so much.
Can you please please teach in Victoria University! As a junior student, I have found your videos extremely useful.
Please come to us! 👍🏻
If VU wants to let me teach online, I'd be only too happy to get the phone call! :)
@@AnthsLawSchool I hope they will call you because they don't know what they are missing! You are a lawyer and a teacher. Hence, you can educate us :) I have spend 5 hours online class to learn one thing. Then, I watched your videos and understand more in a few minutes. :) Again, thank you!
Thank you very much. It was very helpful to me as I just started my diploma in law in Australia
Best of luck!
On the half of the video and pause it. Can not wait to say "thank you very much for your videos".
You have no idea how much I love receiving feedback like this. Thanks so much!
Thanks again Anthony. Just to clarify, and I understand that you may not have the time.
Why do you think Justice Brennan does not refer to, or consider in his ruling the paragraph in the crimes act s.23-(3) “Conduct of the deceased does not constitute extreme provocation if- (a) the conduct was only a non-violent sexual advance to the accused.” As stated by Justice Kirby the non violent sexual advances of the deceased would cause no reasonable person to act as Green had. Did this case create a precedent that violent retaliation is defendable as provocation if the perpetrator has a history of sexually abuse and reacts to unwanted advances in the same way as Green did?
Hi Jase, I haven't watched this video in a long time, but unless I am completely off the mark, I'm pretty sure that the provision you mention there was inserted by the parliament *after* Green's case, in response to that case. I remember that the time that the majority of people were appalled at the High Court decision. There was still a lot of homophobia in Australia at the time, but even people uncomfortable with homosexuality could see that a homosexual advance shouldn't excuse murder.
@@AnthsLawSchool Cheers Anthony. Appreciate your time!J
We need a domain an website that Anthony can run courses direct to the law students those that are interested in learning law an those that have the time to study retirees in a second career .He is the best this country has love his work an abilities matchless by far.
Hey thanks so much! I am thinking about a Patreon, but I wouldn't ever want to be behind a paywall. I'm happy to share my work with anyone who wants to watch 😁
Fabulous video.. but appeal allowed doesn’t necessary mean success, does it? In you second screen, it’s appeal allowed and dismissed. 🤩
Ah. You're thinking of leave to appeal. So sometimes a court will grant leave to appeal, but then dismiss the appeal. "Appeal allowed" means the appelant wins
Thank you very much!
You're welcome!