Not cool of them to make fun of you like that.. completely over exaggerated. There's nothing wrong with how you look, bro. If you take anyone with a short buzzcut, and take a picture of their skull from above like that, it will appear bigger than the average head people are used to seeing. Nothing objectively big or odd about your head. Anyway, don't forget you have brothers out there who are always happy to see you, value the work you put out for the ummah, and love you for the sake of Allah.
@@JV1986 Obviously if Abu Musab does it, it's ok. But if anyone else does it to him, it's not ok. That's how the game works. What you just mentioned to the person, they won't even acknowledge what you just said. They blind follow and let everything he says go. Sheep lol
@@ibross100 exactly, what's haram for us to do is completely halal for them, they'd even probably say it was for the sake of Allah. Ignorant sheep, may Allah protect us.
@@just2goodpeace22 jzk for your concern. But in actuality Deobandism is a small subsect of the ummah with bizarre beliefs that rarely emanates beyond the subcontinent. Salafism is not a 'cult' but a respected institution followed by the likes of Tabari, Shafi, Malik and it is clear it is the way of the salaf after research
MaaShaa Allaah. You finished with a challenge they will never dare to match. Very simple when you explained it because it’s the فطرة. This one Hadeeth can take them more than an hour to explain and they will still leave you in the dark after all. الحمدلله على عقيدة أهل السنة والجماعة.
@@imjustvisiting5397 Fear Allah سبحانه وتعالى!!!!!!! When u r criticizing his looks who r u actually criticizing? Did he create himself? Who created him then ??? ALLAH RABBUL IZZAH !!!! You r criticizing the creation of ur Rabb , over something he doesn't have any control of. Disgusting. May Allah guide u.
Btw the brother is good looking , allahumma barik, n wht adds to it is his personality . May Allah سبحانه وتعالى bless him & his family with goodness in this Duniya n Akhirah.
@Haze I never criticised his looks, but it seems that the bar is awfully low for what you consider good looking. Allah has created both beautiful people and below average looking people. This demonstrates Allah's infinite capacities as a creator. However, Abu Mussab is DEFINITELY NOT someone who is objectively good looking. Stop inflating his ego. He wears glasses like Jeffrey Dahmer. He doesn't have a full beard. He is bald and has no equal facial proportions. He has a weak jaw, crooked teeth and recessed chin. He has poor eye area. He is no Yusuf.
Sorry but pointing out their English mistakes is not the same as the a Arabic mistakes. They are not giving lessons on English language and littetature. But the Arabic is relevant because it is directly linked to the Islamic language and the Arabic level required to read books of fiqh and Aqeedah. Its a matter of credential. But I agree with your other points regarding mocking and beletting one another. It's not the islamic akhlaq
@@thecuriousservant5549 Read the book Naqd ‘Uthmān ibn Sa’īd ‘alā Al-Marīsī Al-Jahmī Al-‘Anīd fīmā Iftarā ‘alā Allāh fī At-Tawhīd, so that your heart is liberated from your Jahmi Aqeedah, onto the Aqeedah of the muhadithseen from the Salaf.
@@thecuriousservant5549 You lie my brother. Let's start with your elders of Deoband. Please explain why this tablighi is looking at non-mahram women. *Baatil Karamaat no. 1 of Deobandis - The gaze of a Tableeghi on a pregnant woman could deliver a wali (instead of controlling his gaze)* Tabish sahab writes that someone informed him that in the masjid of Maharashtra college (Bombay) once a jama`at came to conduct lessons/dars so this man also sat with this group. The speaker started praising this blessed work of tableegh and what they do until he said " the virtue of this blessed work is such that even if the one who goes out in it's path and lays his eyes upon a pregnant woman then she will give birth to a WALI due to his seeing" *(instead of controlling his gaze)* [Ref: Kitab mazkuraa page 18]
If these mawlanas are so unhappy about the size and shape of your head, maybe they should have a talk with the one who created it? Oh wait, they haven’t thought that far in their logic. Imagine belittling Allahs way of designing something. Astaghfirullah
I completely disagree with maulana abdul haleem on this aspect. As you can see maulana uthmaan does not go into stuf like that. You must see their new clip. Accusations brother Abu Mussab has made of shaykh fawzaan.
Hahahaha I love the way you replied these deobandis bcas as an Indian I used to surprise how deobandis easily Dodge Arabs with Thier lovely manners.... Subha Allah you made quite a good video and made non Arabs understand that how deobandis divert Thier own people from the true manhaj...I HV never heard the topic of Tawheed in Thier jamaaths and masaajid....I want to tell you one thing... I have seen that even those non salafi arabs support deobandis even though they knew deobandi manhaj is not according to rasoollullah. How surprising is that!!
Subhanallah me too, I was one of the rare Somali Deobandis making Dawah using the books of Ashraf Ali Thanvi and Paak Iqbal. That was until the abundant shirk and contradictions became clear to me. On one hand they deny Allah rising above on His Arsh while claiming one of their patron saint's pen rose above the Arsh.
@Hamza A yes they taught us a lot of deviant beliefs like the so called "6 kalimas * , kiss bread because it is "holy" we are created from wheat/bread and we descend from paradise because Adam and eve approached a pice of bread etc.. they teach a lot of kufr/shirk and biddah.
Ustadh, May Allah reward you with goodness. It's not good to make fun of them Barakallahu Feekum. Teach them by showing them good Akhlaq while answering their claims. Barakallahu Feekum. And Ustadh you shouldn't pay attention to these guys. Like for example, does Shaykh Al Allamah Saleh Al Fawzan do like this if someone made fun of him? The Shaykh May Allah preserve him doesnt even talk much. That is the sign of Ilm!
Your molvis have lost the plot, they openly lie and go against the Sunnah. Yet you still blind follow these idiots. Go learn Islam and get off the interwebs.
It's full of evil. Check this bizarre and unislamic quote from Deobandi books. *Qasim Nanotwi returns from the dead* Qasim Nanotwi coming back after death In “Arwah Ath-Thalathah” story n°247 It is written that a dispute occurred between Molvi Ahmad Hasan Sahib Amrohi and Molvi Fakhr ul Hasan Sahib Ganghohi, and Mahmud ul Hasan Deobandi took one side and entered the dispute, and this matter remained for a long time, so: “One morning after the prayer of Fajr, Maulana Rafi’ ud Din Sahib (rah) called Maulana Mahmud ul Hasan Sahib in his room (which is in Dar ul ‘Ulum Deoband) and Maulana came…the weather was very cold. Maulana Rafi’ud Din said: first look at my condition, and Maulana looked at his condition and he was wet (because of sweating), he said: The fact is that Maulana Nanotwi (rah) came with his physical body (Jasad ‘Unsuri) which made me sweat this much…and he asked Mahmud ul Hasan not to enter this dispute, so I called you only to tell you this. Maulana Mahmud ul Hasan said: Hazrat, I make Tawbah at your hand and after this I will not talk about this issue. "Ashraf Ali Thanvi wrote in notes: “There can be two possibilities: one that it was a Mithali body which was resembling the physical (‘Unsuri) body, and the second possibility is that the soul did Tasarruf (some Sufi control) and prepared a physical (‘Unsuri) body.” deobandhikaramaat.blogspot.com/2014/04/qasim-nanotwi-returns-from-dead-astala.html?m=1
@@MrAddyan Check this bizarre and unislamic quote from Deobandi books. *Qasim Nanotwi returns from the dead* Qasim Nanotwi coming back after death In “Arwah Ath-Thalathah” story n°247 It is written that a dispute occurred between Molvi Ahmad Hasan Sahib Amrohi and Molvi Fakhr ul Hasan Sahib Ganghohi, and Mahmud ul Hasan Deobandi took one side and entered the dispute, and this matter remained for a long time, so: “One morning after the prayer of Fajr, Maulana Rafi’ ud Din Sahib (rah) called Maulana Mahmud ul Hasan Sahib in his room (which is in Dar ul ‘Ulum Deoband) and Maulana came…the weather was very cold. Maulana Rafi’ud Din said: first look at my condition, and Maulana looked at his condition and he was wet (because of sweating), he said: The fact is that Maulana Nanotwi (rah) came with his physical body (Jasad ‘Unsuri) which made me sweat this much…and he asked Mahmud ul Hasan not to enter this dispute, so I called you only to tell you this. Maulana Mahmud ul Hasan said: Hazrat, I make Tawbah at your hand and after this I will not talk about this issue. "Ashraf Ali Thanvi wrote in notes: “There can be two possibilities: one that it was a Mithali body which was resembling the physical (‘Unsuri) body, and the second possibility is that the soul did Tasarruf (some Sufi control) and prepared a physical (‘Unsuri) body.”
Aqeedah mistakes of deobandis 1- They believe Allah is everywhere in everything 2- They believe in seeking blessings from graves 3- They deny attributes of Allah except for few 4- They separate actions from Iman 5- They believe prophet is alive so you can ask him to intercede and make dua which is Shirk 6- They don't know meaning of Lā Ilāha Ill-Allāh they translate it as no lord but Allah 7- They are fanatic hanafis , don't care about hadith 8- They believe in seeking tabarruk from "Saints" 9- They deny ahad hadith when it comes to Aqeedah And many more
Majority that I have met don’t believe Allah is everywhere rather they believe Allah exists without a place. There’s an institure called Masjid Darussalam that promotes that and many come to study there from all over America
@@supersayain48 Darussalam is a Salafi publication house, except for a few books, other are correct. If you are talking about some other deobandi masjid named "Darussalam" than I don't know. Also, a little correction you made a mistake, most of the Deobandis belief is Allah is everywhere, as they are also Sufis as well, so they adopt Ibn Arabi, Aqeedah on that. As for not existing without a place, and that Allah is everywhere both are Jahmi beliefs which the Salaf refuted. So upon you is the way of the Muhadithseen from the Salaf, which is the Aqeedah of the Messenger of Allah, and his companions, and those who follow than in righteousness.
Imam Uthman Abū Sa’īd Ad-Darami said: The opposer also claimed that Allāh has no border, no extent and no end. And this is the foundation upon which Jahm built all of his misguidances, and from it he derived his dubious words in which one falls into error. And it is a saying regarding which, it has not reached us that anyone from all of the worlds has ever said this before Jahm. So someone having a conversation with him said: “I verily know what you intend with (saying) this, O you non-Arab. You mean that Allāh is nothing. Because all of the creation knows that ‘nothing’ is what is said about the thing which has no border, no extend and no end. And that ‘nothing’ does not have a border, an extent, an end, nor a description. So ‘something’ will always have a description without any exception, while ‘nothing’ is described (as being) without a border and without an end. And your saying: ‘He has no border’, means that He is nothing.” Imam Uthman Abū Sa’īd Ad-Darami than said: And Allāh has a border which no-one knows about except Him. And it is not allowed for anyone to falsely imagine in himself the end of His border, rather we believe in the border and we entrust the knowledge regarding it to Allāh. And there is also a border to His location, and He is upon the Throne above His heavens. So those are two borders. And ‘Abdullāh ibn Al-Mubārak was asked: “How do we know our Lord?” He said: “Upon the Throne, separated from His creation.” It was said: “By a border?” He said: “By a border.” It is sahīh. It was narrated by the author in “Ar-Radd ‘alā Al-Jahmiyyah” (162), ‘Abdullāh ibn Ahmad in “As-Sunnah” (216), Al-Bayhaqī in “Al-Asmā was-Sifāt” (902) and Ibn ‘Abdil-Barr in “At-Tamhīd” (7/142) by ways from ‘Alī ibn Al-Hasan ibn Shaqīq. Verily did (both) the word of the Muslims and the disbelievers agree upon that Allāh is in heaven, and they described Him as such, except the misguided AlMarīsī and his companions. Even the young boys who have not yet reached the age of responsibility verily know Him as such. When something befalls the young boy he raises his hands to his Lord and invokes Him in heaven besides everything else. So everyone knows more about Allāh and His location than the Jahmiyyah. (Naqd ‘Uthmān ibn Sa’īd ‘alā Al-Marīsī Al-Jahmī Al-‘Anīd fīmā Iftarā ‘alā Allāh fī At-Tawhīd).
@@hmzzrg5045 exactly, these guys both state we will take the higher road, then both of them start attacking each other and mocking And I consider both of these groups of people traditionalists. Abu musab outright made tabdi on them with no authority to do that. Rabi madkhali doesn't even call saved qutb an innovator!
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq you "responding" doesn't mean anything. You're just deluding yourself, you will come on the day of judgement with all the slander and accusations you've made against us of tabdi3 and other things.
Can you make a video about the disagreements you have with Sh Uthman ? I benefited alot from his classes, I'd like to know if I learned something wrong. BarakAllahou fik.
Asalamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullah, May Allah bless you and aid you in seeking the truth. The differences between Ustadh Abu Mussab and Shaykh Uthman are differences between two brothers upon Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah wa Salafiyyah, these are differences between brothers and their approaches in dawah and what they see as appropriate and inappropriate in methodology etc. And this is pretty much the extent, so akhi Al Kareem do not worry too much about it, always remember we do not attach ourselves to individuals and we go where daleel is, every individual will make mistakes, but the question is always what is the extent of the mistake, is it in usool/aqidah or in furooh. و الله اعلم
@@AnonymousAkh Assalamualaikum, jazaakallahu khayran. I have the same thought actually. Will it be okay for us to know in which things they differ to one another? Could you explain if it’s okay
@@AnonymousAkh uthman Ibn Farooq is not a shaykh at all, wallahi you people are so ignorant, he is no where near a sheikh, he can't even read the Qur'an properly without distorting, he can't even read Surah Al fatiha.
Let the Mawlanas read this… Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The believer does not insult others, he does not curse others, he is not vulgar, and he is not shameless.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 1977
Be proud Ustadz Abu Musab because they needed to watch hundreds of your videos to find those minute mistakes. May Allah guide these two maulanas eating halwa into correct Aqeedah.
@@ziasmailbox They had volunteers go through his videos not them lol, also aqeedatul wasitiyyah? the same one that ascribes to Allah two real literal eyes with no evidence from Qur'an and sunnah??
Let the Mawlanas read this… Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, a man might speak a word to make those around him laugh, yet by it he plunges farther than the star of Pleiades.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 9220
He said something about your beautiful head with the sunnah cut? 😂 Allahu musta3aan. I’m jealous that you have that amazing-shaped head in a good way. May Allah bless it for you.
WAllahi u could make all mistaCes u want in language. I thank Allah that they're in the language and not the aqeedah and meeting Allah with that.. May Allah safeguard us.
*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_* *DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!*
Mashallah, you admit to your mistakes and correct your mistakes. Unlike them, they refuse to correct their mistakes. And they will continue doing bidah
The fact that you are on TH-cam and your peers is a bidah in and of itself. You are a wannabe Desert Rat mentally living in the medieval period. Bidha, bidha, fool.
@@hampshireconnoly675 Come on brother, if you cannot be academical regarding your answer, best to remain silent. I don't think you understand Bid'ah in the Deen and Bid'ah in the Dunya.
@@ExtremeShez I will be academic to those with a level of intellect. This individual on the other hand is very insulting, and condescending, therefore he requires such a response. Now giving dawah is an integral part of the deen, and the prophet and his companions did not give dawah using TH-cam therefore according to his logic this is a huge bida. This is the issue this individual, and his alike take things to extremes and literally think they can live the same as 1400 years ago in the Arabian desert.
@@hampshireconnoly675 I'm confused as to how you think his logic is that TH-cam is a bid’ah, what did he say to give you that impression? I think you're wrong but I'm willing to be corrected, in shaa Allah. As the two molvis are extremist in their ideology which is why they need to be refuted.
Asalamualaykum Abu Musab. Not sure I am changing my views fully to align with yours but I know one thing. You are definitely sincere my brother keep it up. I use to maybe not think well of you but you do not faff around alhamdulillah. Keep outing these wrongens please.
He's our salafi brother... Following his channel from 2018 ... Alhamdulillah... May Allah bless him immensely... And forgive his mistakes if there are .. Aameen
Actually you can say إلى توحيدُ الربوبية if we combine the two words as one (اسم). I studied النحو some twenty years ago and I still know that. ولكن العداوة تُعمي البصر
Had this not been a refutation of their deviance, abu mussab ain't lying about the roasting thing lool. We lebanese come with very heavy artillery when we dont wanna hold back
The halwa has returned boys. 'shab e barat is near and it's a common innovation to eat halwa and roti on that day specially and to spread it amongst the neighborhood. But it's widespread. So Shaban in the subcontinent is halwa season.' time for some juicy halwa eating content.
Why don't you go to Saudi to lick the feet of MBS? I agree bid'ah is wrong, but unless you've witness them in that bid'ah, you cannot judge them. And most deobandis are against these kinds of bid'ah. But looking at you, you're a typical pseudo salafi, a troll. So it's useless to speak with you.
Delete this man, The Sunnah is to defend the Religion, not one's own reputation. Allah is the Best Disposer of your affairs so let Him deal with them, you've done enough to refute them اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ. Take the advice of your seniors and the other part of yourself that you mentioned at the beginning. I said this before, this feels too much like a Muhammad Hijab video. وفقك الله لما يحب ويرضى.
@@nahimwasit I refuse to believe Brother Abu Mus'ab did this for 'fun'. Deen is not amusement, akhi. InShaAllah I'm ignorant on this and proven wrong, but this Is not from the Sunnah of RasulAllah ﷺ or the Salaf to name-call and make fun of Muslims, and defend oneself in such a way, be they on the verge of Kufr. The Prophet ﷺ only allowed his nephew to do so to the Kuffar at his time. InShaAllah the better path is to let them die in their Rage and misguidance after it has been made clear to the masses sufficiently and the Hujjah has been established on them. @OneWayToParadise والله اعلم.
You're awesome.... At baseless criticism. It's like watching high school children bicker. Gone are the days where humility was exemplified by those with knowledge. End of days.
Search for "Zahid Patel". A top salafi speaker / debater from India. And if you know the surname Patel (your comment suggests you do), you should know that they are names of Muslims as well. Don't behave like fools just because you are aligned towards something. Seek forgiveness from Allah SWT, make taubah from sectarianism and go focus on your own deeds.
The scholars are the inheritors of the Prophets, in knowledge and in akhlaaq and character. These individuals akhlaaq is more like that of Iblees and Abu Lahab. If these are the people you look up to, you might as well book your seat in Jahannam already.
@@meelash1 yes their adab reflects a lot. Looks like they might have some knowledge but they have failed to implement even 1% of the knowledge that the quran and the sunnah gives us about akhlaq. Their deobandis founders have corrupted aqeedah and used to associate with sufis and barelwis yet they are unaware of it. They fail to pronounce simple arabic.
@@hamzanocap how is their akhlaq bad? They show true passion for defending the Qur'an and trying to help the Muslims away from being deceived by juhal who call themselves shaykh and muftis when they can't even read Arabic or even the Qur'an properly, they expose frauds and especially the salafies who claim to be people of knowledge when they're not. Their shuyukh say things about Allah with literally no knowledge. They online figure heads such as uthman literally copy pasted from other Arabic books and tried to pass it off as his own, they dress up like shuyukh to lie and fool the people, they're frauds. This guy is trying to mock their English thinking he really did something. Their English is perfectly fine, you can hear it clearly and they can speak it, nothing wrong with it, and on top of that, it's probably their 3rd or 4th language, what does Abu mussab know? How to break the Arabic language? May Allah guide us
@@hamzanocap Ulamas job to expose people like wakkari who use bad language. u cna book yours there in jahannam since u cant c pass ur ego and his. watch both channels and then decide. dont be a blind follwoers. salafiyyah r known for their stupidity but cant take criticism hahahha
If you really want to see the "sincerity" of these two individuals, you should check out the condition that they put to remove the video that they made regarding Shiekh Uthman's mistakes. They put the condition that they would remove the video if Shiekh Uthman stops speaking about deobandis, and I was absolutely blown away seeing where allegiance of these two individuals lie and what they are "sincere" to. Had they been sincere in their claims to put out the video because they care about Qur'an being recited incorrectly, like they show it out to be, they wouldn't have accepted to take down the video at any condition since the recitation of the Qur'an is at question here. However, they are willing to take down the video if Shiekh Uthman stops talking about deobandis. SubhanAllah. This shows where their allegiance, "sincerity" and priorities are.
No, you've got it all wrong. They originally had an agreement, in the beginning they were gonna keep it up regardless of anything, but then other people in the community were telling them that uthman was giving dawah and Christians were gonna use this against him, so they were asked by other people to take it down for the sake of the dawah. They didn't agree to take it down if he doesn't speak about deobandi scholars at all, they in fact told that jahil uthman to not talk about Scholars and imams of this religion and calling them deviants and so on as uthman was going on attacking so many of the previous scholars and their beliefs, including many big names like imam nawawi and others, this is what upset them, the deobandi part had nothing to do with the agreement, uthman just said he was willing to sit and challenge any deobandi so they offered him to sit which he ran away from obviously. Uthman started the attacking first by attacking major Islamic scholars of the past, claiming they had deviated aqeedas and that they didn't know Allah and believed kufri things, the brothers could've just ignored the whole thing but they also thought of the dawah that was given and came to an agreement. Uthman himself did agree to this but then broke it when he came to the UK.
@@Ryan-lf6ds And? How does that contradict what I said about the "sincerity" and allegiance of these two individuals to their sect, rather than what they show it for? If you really think you are going to dodge it by making me defend Shiekh Uthman then you are mistaken. Shiekh Uthman has made mistakes in regards to language and he should be corrected on it, but not by the "I scratch your back and I scratch yours" approach of these two individuals who prioritise their sect.
@@Ryan-lf6ds Of course you had to show your upbringing through your words, without caring about the fact that Allah is watching and you will be answerable to Allah about what you say.
@@Ryan-lf6ds Yes, I can definitely see that you have been doing this from a very young age. How else would one not fear Allah even after being reminded of answering Allah on the day of judgment?
I appreciate you bringing such misguidance to light. Insha’allah these videos will bring people out of this ignorance. That being said I’ve never encountered such people Alhamdullilah. It was very shocking hearing him shriek such horrific things about our beloved Prophet (P.B.U.H). I can’t continue watching the video. I’ve liked it though so insha’allah this will reach more people with bizarre understandings of the deen. Jazakallah khair.
th-cam.com/video/9n3g7jtRPRs/w-d-xo.html Look, your shiekh fawzan has literally said the same thing about the prophet peace be upon him. you people don't even read what your own shuyukh say. May Allah guide us.
@@unknown-808 can you explain the kufriyat of your elders. "You and me is Shirk upon Shirk” In the English translation of ‘Irshaadul Mulook[1], Zakariya Kandhalwi mentioned in his introduction, a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah Al-Makki: "O my refuge of both worlds! You have requested information about the halat (condition) of this useless one... I have developed a natural dislike for sin and a natural inclination for obedience. This effect is due solely to that relatiotiship (nisbat) which has reached me from the spiritual effulgence of Hadhrat. To say more will be disrespectful. May Allah forgive that I be a liar, for I have written on the instruction of Hadhrat. In reality I am nothing. It is only Your Shadow - only Your existence (i.e. Allah’s existence). What am I? I am nothing. Only He is. You and me are Shirk upon Shirk." [End quote] So affirming two existences is Shirk for these people, and creation is only the ‘shadow’ of Allah... Astaghfirullah!! Also, Gangohi called Imdadullah “refuge of both worlds,” when only Allah can provide refuge to a person in both worlds, yet these people seek refuge in the creation instead of the Rabb of all that exists. And here Gangohi clearly stated he is a liar, in reference to their hiding their creed of Wahdahtul Wujood in order to preserve themselves from attack! [1] Page 20, published by Majlisul Ulama of South Africa. This letter is also quoted by Zakariya Kandhalwi in his “Fazail Sadaqat, part 2, chapter 6: Ahadith- The excellence of Tawakkul, after Hadith 10
I tried to give this brothers a chance, he attacks whilst being riddled with shortcomings of his own. Don't get me started on a khutbah he gave where he openly called for cursing Muslim drug dealers and making du'a for them to burn in hellfire. We all make mistakes and those of us who sincerely repent have been guided to leave that which displeases our Lord, and call to good. Why couldn't he just make a du'a for such people? He laughs at brothers for mistakes they make in their Arabic (like Brother Shamsi and Shaykh Uthman ibn Farooq), claiming they shouldn't be in a position to teach or give knowledge, when the fact was after watching everyone's videos, the most benefits were found in the videos of the brothers they mock, where as their "al islam productions" channel just incited hatred and un-just, arrogant belittlement of others who are genuinely doing good works. May Allaah 'azza wa jall guide us all and have mercy on us.
@@nod.coffee Just give them books of Imam Uthman Abi Sa'id Ad-Darami, he refutes all of there deviant belief. One of the deviant belief of the Maturidis is Allah is One but not in number.
*Baatil Karamaat no. 1 of Deobandis - The gaze of a Tableeghi on a pregnant woman could deliver a wali (instead of controlling his gaze)* Tabish sahab writes that someone informed him that in the masjid of Maharashtra college (Bombay) once a jama`at came to conduct lessons/dars so this man also sat with this group. The speaker started praising this blessed work of tableegh and what they do until he said " the virtue of this blessed work is such that even if the one who goes out in it's path and lays his eyes upon a pregnant woman then she will give birth to a WALI due to his seeing" *(instead of controlling his gaze)* [Ref: Kitab mazkuraa page 18]
Abu Mussab is in TROUBLE. 😯His excellenct "Arabic" is getting exposed. He is getting refuted but his die-hard fans are in stubborn denial. Watch each other's responses without holding any biases.
Ustadh, better disable comments. Nobody is free of error. comments can be unnecessary baggage on the day of judgement as you are giving them a platform. Sincere advice, leave them and address their errors without naming them. You have done enough to warn against them. Continue your noble work of teaching works of scholars. May Allah bless you and increase you in ranks.
@@ExposingAhlulBidah ameen, sheikhs recitation is beautiful aswell, used to love watching his lectures and debates with deviants like deobandhis and brelvis also miss him in speakers corner, he's been going there for a very late time
It is possible for prophets to be alive in their graves. I am a Salafi by the way, but there is no running away from this Hadith: “The dead infants of the believers are in a mountain in Jannah whereby they are being taken care of by Ibrahim Alayhisalam and Sarah until they are given back to their parents on Yawm al-Qiyyamah.”
Yes, the Prophets of Allah عليهم السلام are Alive, but this life is not like our life, this is called by RasulAllah ﷺ as the Barzakhi life in authentic Ahadith. This does not fulfil the first condition of Du'a/Istighaatha - That the Person who the being asked is Alive in this life.
@@pursueexcellence7737 Did I say that it did? I am just saying that we cannot deny the fact that it is possible for prophets to be a alive in their graves.
@@peacezorro5701Brother this is Usool ad-Deen possibility is not certainty and in Aqeedah there is no place for Rai, As was mentioned by Imam Humaydhi and Imam Ahmed in there books Usool as-Sunnah.
Let the Mawalanas read this… Aisha reported: I said to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, “Such is enough for Safiyyah,” making fun of her short stature. The Prophet said, “You have said a word that would pollute the water of the sea if mixed with it.” Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4875
@@thecuriousservant5549 Maalik Bin Deenaar [rahimahullaah] said, "O people! Indeed, when gold and silver are presented to a dog, it does not know what they are, but if a bone is presented, it moves toward it. Likewise, the foolish people amongst you do not know truth". [Hilyatul Awliyaa 1/419]
I would advise you to sit with the scholars and learn from their manners, Abu Mussab. I would advise the followers of Abu Mussab to not encourage him to make these sorts of videos.
What’s sad is apart from any sincere knowledge that you guys share transmit from all sides share all well & good , but both are bad as each other with the mocking and that , also the racial sly under tone remarks is very sad and bad , I sense that or it gives me the impression that because you’re an Arab you seem to take the high ground , I get it two non Arabs questioning you’re Arabia لغة العربية etc may anger you , but the sly racial mocking undertones where I’ve seen it before from you smh , also plz don’t think for a second that I am with the other two brothers or something nah no way , anyway sad very sad to see this sort of animosity and backwards and forwards rather than focus on actual DAWAH anyway I can go on but man as a Muslim who has roots from Bangladesh but was born in the uk , the sly racial mocking undertones made me feel bad and sad , also online no matter who you are other ppl will criticise mock take apart your opinion, it’s the way it goes no need to take it personally and cross red lines .!!!!! Also Now you mocking the English word of his like you didn’t like him doing in Arabic but in Arabic and matters deen must be cleared and rectified and generally most of the sincere ppl know a slip of the tongue etc is not some sort of intentional way to mislead anyone , also those two brothers are from up north of the uk and have a northern accent nothing to really mock publicly anyway I find it sad and distasteful and very un-Islamic lacking of حكمة Hikmah , also I’m not 100% sure but sheikh Uthman just ignores them which is classy move by him not seen him bite to their antics .!!!! السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته أخي Also disclaimer all you brothers are much more knowledgeable than I am I’m just sharing my opinion on the approach hikmah of the delivery etc… nothing more I love u all for the sake of Allah swt
There is no racial slur at all. I always imitate the Egyptians for their heavy accent and we all find it entertaining. So I am an Arab who is racist against my people?
@@OneWayToParadise Brother as someone from the Asian community your Muslim brother I’m telling you in these type of videos this is what I sense and feel from you , just for context I know Br Shamsi , and all the brothers from Speakers corner , my main channel is called OSCC#DAWAH , I’ve been away from the park and online for a while now not been active as such but planning on coming back , I will do a reaction video if I have time to point them out what makes me feel or what I mean , trust me bro it comes from ur end that oh I’m an Arab and you guys are not , anyway I will point it out then maybe you will get what I mean , also I am getting so confused to take knowledge from whom with every group etc saying they are wrong and on the incorrect AQEEDAH عقيدة / Manhaj etc unfortunately the DAWAH is confusing after watching these videos , I prayed to Allah swt and asked Oh Allah swt who is on the correct Islam as all this is so confusing anyway brother may Allah swt bless u and us all and guide us all Ameen
@@OneWayToParadise I made some typo’s so I edited my original comment IA There maybe more as it’s late in the uk I should be sleeping very tired if I have time I will correct it again if there is more mistakes , typo’s etc …
@@SyedReacxts The answer is marinate yourself with the books of the Salaf, in the case of every dispute return to them. And take knowledge from those who propagate the way of the Salaf, from the books of the Salaf.
@@SyedReacxts akhi the salaf are the ones on the correct aqeedah. Don't study from ahlul bid'ah like deobandis,sufis,maturidis,jahmites,shias. Study the books of the salaf the scholars of the 4 madhabs and you can clearly see from their behaviour that who are on the correct aqeedah. Tawheed Promoter has exposed these deobandis multiple times.
Lol I couldn't watch the whole video..those brothers need help..May Allaah guide them. But you have a very nice shaped head brother. May Allaah bless you.
May Allah guide these brothers. They must have spent countless hours going through all your videos trying to nitpick and find Arabic grammar mistakes. It’s embarrassing. I feel sorry for their followers
Subxaanalaaah. When we speaking , we all make some unintentional mistakes, even if you have highest degree in the Arabic . I believe these two brothers have some other issues with brother أبو مصعب.
Wallaahi you are funnier than they could ever be. By the way I am non Arab Muslim and I believe all people who call to Allaah should learn all the Makhaarij as best as they can
Yaaa abu mussab I love you so much ustadh, you are the funniest dude in the world man 😂😂😂😂 you and shamsi from dus dawah y’all got jokes for days 😂😂😂 the funniest salafies in the dawah wallahi lol
A Dozen Double standards of Wahhabi Cult Members: 1. When Shaykh Fawzaan describes the condition of the Prophet (SAW) in his grave, it is haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does it, it is baatil. 2. When Salafi shaykhs base fundamentals of aqeedah on fabricated hadeeth (such as "sitting"), it is haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) cites even a slightly weak hadeeth in a secondary fiqh matter it is totally baatil. 3. When Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin describes Allah as "wearing clothes" (a verb that cannot even be found in a fabricated hadeeth), it is haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) said something baseless it is baatil. 4. When Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin claims that sifaat of Allah such as "Ridaa" are temporal and caused by creation, it is haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) affirms that Allah's qualities are permanent he is still a jahmi, upon baatil. 5. When Abu Mussab mocks and insults it is sincerity, good manners, and haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does it, it is insincerity, bad manners, and baatil. 6. When Abu Mussab makes shocking basic Arabic mistakes (even with common words, let alone case endings), he is still proficient and knowledgeable-upon haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does it he is a jaahil, upon baatil. 7. When Abu Mussab makes false allegations he is upon haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does so he is a liar, upon baatil. 8. When a Wahhabi runs away from a challenge or debate, it is because he doesn't want to waste his time-despite being in the haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does so, it is because he doesn't have sound evidence and is upon baatil. 9. When a Wahhabi makes takfeer of tabdee' of other Muslims, without evidence (as Abu Mussab has done in his comments here), then he is upon haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does so, then he is slandering and is upon baatil. 10. Wahhabi shuyookh are always upon haqq, even if the evidences indicate otherwise. Deobandis (or any non-Wahhabis) are always upon baatil, regardless of their sound evidences. 11. When Wahhabis go against ijmaa and attribute "silence" to Allah, it is haqq. If a Deobandi does so (or any non-Wahhabi), he is negating Allah's speech-a certain Mutazili and Jahmi-upon baatil. 12. When Shaykh Fawzaan says that every authentic, ahad hadeeth is qati'iyy, he is upon haqq. If a Deobandi ( or any non-Wahhabi) said so then he does not know elementary usoolul-fiqh and is upon baatil. Wahhabi motto: This inconsistent manhaj is always haqq, especially if the truth is otherwise. May Allah guide these Wahhabis to the true manhaj of the Salaf. Disclaimer: Before anyone has a panic attack, the term, "Wahhabi", as defined by Shaykh Ibn Baz, refers to the followers of Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab. Also, there is clear proof for every attribution that is made to Wahhabi shuyookh here.
😂😂 stupid deobandi babas, writing things without any proof, 1. I never seen shaykh saalih al fawzaan speaking of unseen things which aren't mentioned in the quran and sunnah ,where is your daleel for the first point , And the remaining points Mr Deobandi Baba ji,you haven't provided any Daleel. Just wasted your time writing all these points as if , people of haq going to read it and change their path to deviance. Go get some life babaji
We love you Abu mussab from the Kashmiri and Pakistani community from alhe hadith in England , the innovators hate always comes Out with there mockery and poor manners
@@stadiamak692 Ya Jahil. We the Salafi has hundreds of the books of the Salaf as our evidence. As for Imam Barbahari, he was a known Imam of the Sunnah, what is mentioned in Tabaqat Al-Hanabilla by Imam Qadhi Abu Yala, as for the the chain of narration which include Ghulaam Khaleel, than that man do you know what he was known for, because of which the Muhadithseen graded him as a liar, it was lying on the Messenger of Allah to soften the heart of the people, meaning he was a Sufi. However, scholars of Takhreej has said, that name was inserted later due to malign the authenticity of Sharah Sunnah. As Imams like Shaykh ul-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, Imam adh-Dhahabi, Imam Ibn Muflih, Imam as-Safadee, Imam Ibn Hajar, Imam Ibn al-Imaad, and Imam Suyuti as well, has ascribed it to Imam Barbahari. And the evidence for it are many. Once such evidence is the author writing this line, Everything that I have described to you in this book is from Allah, the Most High, from the Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam), from his Companions, from the Tabi’een and from the third generation to the fourth. And Ghulaam Khaleel died in (275 A.H), so how can it be from the forth. This is a very strong point. Another strong point is Imam Ibn Kaamil died in the year (350 A.H) and as has preceded Imam Barbahari who died (329 A.H). So perhaps due to the persecution of Imam Barbahari and his students by the rulers lead to some of the scribers to change the name of the author for fear that they would be seized and punished.
@@stadiamak692 We the Salafis has hundreds of books like Sharah Sunnah to prove our point. Do You think that there is much difference of Sharah Sunnah of Imam Muzani, or Al-Shariah of Imam Ajjuri, or Al-Ibanna of Ibn Battah, or the the Kitab as-sunnah by Imam Abdullah ibn Ahmed, or Kitab Al-Sunnah of Imam Ibn Harb ibn Ismail Al-Karmani, or the Aqeedah Raziyyan of the two Imam, or the books of Imam Uthman Abi Sa'id Ad-Darami, which are ample, or Usool as-sunnah of Imam Humaydhi or Imam Ahmed, or Kitab At-Tawheed of Imam Ibn Khuzaymah or Al-Haiyyah of Imam Abi Dawood, etc, and the Sharah Sunnah of Imam Barbahari.
He made me laugh sarcastically describing your head 8:50 that was funny. I thought we were talking علم not Allah’s creation 😂😂😂Wallaahi people have become blind because they are following someone regardless
I thought you were advised by a senior student of knowledge/ sheikh to not engage in these videos of refutation? At least I remember you saying that in one of your recent ones. Wise decision I thought but here you are again. Lowe these wastemen! No one is giving them any attention except a few and you are giving them more attention than they deserve. Also- the stupidity that these people display is on another level and it won't end..trust me.
Did you really write “if your so brave”? Lol. Bashing Abu Musab for his grammar when you, yourself can’t even write simple English. I guess it’s human to make mistakes huh?!
@@Luna_87A tbf who’s gona take from someone who has a head tattoo and shaves his beard and makes mistakes which change meaning of Qur’aan. Haq is with the people who persevere the ilm especially Qur’aan. Not reading with rules and proper Tajweed says alot about the person.
Madkhali on fire 😁😁😁Time to speak about the kufr and deviations promoted by the Khawarij rulers in Arabian peninsula rather than making fun of Arabic accents of non-Arabs. The Madkhali Wajdi Akkiri may not be aware that many of the teachers in the Islami University in MEdina used to be and still are from the sub continent.
@@hamzanocap Sheikh Abdul Wahab was right about a lot of things and was wrong about certain things. He isn’t infallible. He was perhaps not well versed in politics and thus was used by petty power hungry rulers. The rulers themselves never held back from rebelling against the unified Ottoman Muslim state with all its defects. But the palace scholars of these rulers don’t utter a word against the rulers allying with Zionists and Hindus and instead brands the righteous scholars who speaks against these deviances as Khawarij. These rulers are the Khawarij who broke the muslim unity.
@@SS-kg8qw Rather than focus on nonsensical political waffle ( that Allah will hold you accountable for), perfect your Salah and recitation of the Qur'an, Ramadhan is only a couple weeks away. May Allah guide you to the straight path.
@@SS-kg8qw At least get the name of the scholar you are trying to mention right, O genius who. The Sheikh name was Muhammad his father name was Abdul Wahhab.
@@SS-kg8qw Just like these Jahmiyyah from the Deobandiyyah are blind to the narrations of the Messenger of Allah, you guys influenced by "the Sitters" methodology, you guys are also blind to all of the narrations mentioned in Al-Shariah of Ajjuri, or Al-Ibanna of Ibn Batta, or Sharah Usool Al-Atiqad of Imam Ibn Zaid Al-Lalakaee.
Those 2 brothers make more videos on Sh uthman and other people than what they believe in! I don't get it if people are questioning your beliefs then make rebuttal videos rather than finding mistakes of others! So basically they are acknowledging what others think of deobandis!
The hadeeth mentioned Allah comes to His faithful worshipers on the Day of Resurrection and appears to them in an image other than the image which they saw Him in previously as a test for them. He will say (to them), “I am your Lord.” They will say, “We take refuge with Allah from you. We will stay here till our Lord comes to us.” And when our Lord comes, we will recognize Him. Subsequently, Allah will come to them in His own image, recognizable to them, and say, “I am your Lord.” They will say, “You are our Lord…”
I'm seeing your videos for the first time and thought you were handsome 🤣🤣, then when I heard these people mocking your head, it was hilarious. I dare them to measure the circumference of their head and then compare it with yours, if any of theirs is bigger than your head, they better delete their TH-cam channel or accept they took an L
@Hmz Zrg exactly, these guys both state we will take the higher road, then both of them start attacking each other and mocking And I consider both of these groups of people traditionalists. Abu musab outright made tabdi on them with no authority to do that. Rabi madkhali doesn't even call saved qutb an innovator!
The Salafis in sub-continent like the Muhadith of Pakistan Sheikh Zubair Ali Zai has vehemently refuted these deobandis and there devaint Aqeedah. As for calling them from the Ashab ul-Hadith than that speech is Batil, they are from the Ahul-Kalam, and they are Maturids, so there deviance is known, one of there belief is Allah is one but not in number. Contemplate on these statements. Imam of the Jahmi Maturidiyyah Taftazani states: “We know that the first obligation is to know, and recognize Allah. Are we supposed to know Allah through ilm-ul-kalam? If that were the case, then we would say, ‘He does not have a form nor anyone resembling Him nor body nor shape nor meat nor blood nor personality nor appearance nor mass nor colour nor taste nor smell nor feel nor experience of heat or cold or dryness nor wetness nor length nor width nor depth nor togetherness nor separateness nor movement nor stationariness nor can He be divided and he cannot be put into different parts and limbs and he does not face a direction and he does not have a right side or left or front or back or above or below and he is not part of this world and he is not outside of this world”. Contrasted with the Hindu in regards to their believe in Allah. The Upanishad states, “It is not coarse, not fine, nor short, nor long, not glowing, not adhesive, without shadow and without darkness, without air and without space, without stickiness, odourless, tasteless, without eye, without voice, without mouth, without measure, without inside and without outside”. Imam Ibn Mandah said: Interpretation (ta͛wil) is viewed by Ahul-hadith as a form of denial. Al-Radd ͚ala Al-Jahmiyyah Sheikh Zubari Ali Zai the Muhadith of Pakistan said, that our fight is with the Hanafis who are Deobandis, and Brewails, who in reality are the deniers of the Sunnah (due to extremism), those Hanafis who are not extreme in Fiqh, and who gives precedence to Sunnah, by applying the statement of Imam Nauman that if a Sahih Hadith reach me that is my Madhab, if my statement contradict the Sunnah throw it at the wall, they are the flowers of our head.
Some of the deviance of those of you ascribe to the Ashab ul-Hadith. Aqeedah errors of the Deobandis 1- They believe Allah is everywhere in everything 2- They believe in seeking blessings from graves 3- They deny attributes of Allah except for few 4- They separate actions from Iman 5- They believe prophet is alive so you can ask him to intercede and make dua which is Shirk 6- They don't know meaning of Lā Ilāha Ill-Allāh they translate it as no lord but Allah 7- They are fanatic hanafis , don't care about hadith 8- They believe in seeking tabarruk from "Saints" 9- They deny ahad hadith when it comes to Aqeedah And many more
Wallahi I don’t understand 💀 These mawlanas only focus on details but never will they be real men and show us from the Quran, the sunna and the books of the salaf that our aqeeda is corrupted. I prefer being the worst in arabic and at least have the aqeeda of the salaf than being the best in arabic and rejecting Allah’s attributes, worshipping the grave of mawlana ulabitou salaloulou… 🤦🏿♂️
Books of the Salaf such as As-Sunnah of Imam Abdullah or As-Sunnah of Imam ibn Harb ibn Ismail Al-Karmani or Books of Uthman Abi Sa'id Ad-Darami, etc is kryptonite to these Maturids who believe Allah is one but not in number.
If your pronunciation Tajweed is corrupted with grave mistakes whilst teaching someone higher level sciences then you are lost. Pronunciation and error in certain words is a big sin. This is Allah’s book not ABC blue clues. The ilm and Haq is with the people who preserve the Qur’aan especially. Likewise you learn from old institutions because they uphold the integrity. Like you study for a degree you go to a proven place in institution and integrity. Not at home DIY self study ABC TH-cam. How do you think Islam Qur’aan is preserved from Teacher to Student. Continuous chain sanad
@@bouncer786 what you say is pure haqq no doubt about that but firstly here the brother didn’t make as grave mistakes as these mawlanas make it seem (I’m not justifying quoting badly the book of Allāh) so the brother alhamdoulilah, as far I know, isn’t concerned by what you sayin. But how on the earth a good recitation will benefit them if their aqīda is corrupted like what the hell goin on 💀 The very book they’re refuting others for « misquoting » it, they themselves, even though they’ve s good recitation of it, don’t even follow it in terms of understanding of tawhīd and creed. I mean how can someone care about digging deep in videos of salafi du’at and trying to find their mistakes while the basics of aqīda and tawhīd you don’t even respect them 💀 We should both have sound creed and master the recitation of the book of Allāh
Don’t they think that they’ve someting more urgent to fix on themselves first especially in terms of aqīda… ya akhi how can someone use ‘ilmoul kalām and aristotle philosophical principles in the book of Allāh, ending up by rejecting his attributes and now when the muslims with the sound belief that goes straight back to the sahābas refute him and his bātil he turns nasty and he filthily fetch for any mistake to dismiss them. Are we on Jupiter or whut 💀. And again, to make it clear, i’m not justifying the mistakes in Quran recitation rather i promote the fact that we should lower them and always make sure not to play with the speech of Allāh. And whosoever plays with the book of Allāh then we should not listen to him but there are some errors that are understandable because of the context and so on.
![Abu Mussab's Ignorance Of Arabic [Full Video] @OneWayToParadise @OneMessageFoundation](/img/n.gif)
Not cool of them to make fun of you like that.. completely over exaggerated. There's nothing wrong with how you look, bro. If you take anyone with a short buzzcut, and take a picture of their skull from above like that, it will appear bigger than the average head people are used to seeing. Nothing objectively big or odd about your head. Anyway, don't forget you have brothers out there who are always happy to see you, value the work you put out for the ummah, and love you for the sake of Allah.
Well put💯
@@JV1986 Obviously if Abu Musab does it, it's ok. But if anyone else does it to him, it's not ok. That's how the game works. What you just mentioned to the person, they won't even acknowledge what you just said. They blind follow and let everything he says go. Sheep lol
@@ibross100 exactly, what's haram for us to do is completely halal for them, they'd even probably say it was for the sake of Allah. Ignorant sheep, may Allah protect us.
th-cam.com/video/htQqDnguav8/w-d-xo.html
Killing my motivation to learn Arabic.May Allah make it easy for all of us
So glad Allah guided me away from the aqidah of the deobandis and guided me to salafiyah Alhamdulilah. I actively cringe at my old beliefs
Same here. But I was more from the ikhwani side.
Hamza bhai, please don't be fooled. Honestly I have been there..salafi is a cult.
@@just2goodpeace22 jzk for your concern. But in actuality Deobandism is a small subsect of the ummah with bizarre beliefs that rarely emanates beyond the subcontinent. Salafism is not a 'cult' but a respected institution followed by the likes of Tabari, Shafi, Malik and it is clear it is the way of the salaf after research
th-cam.com/video/9n3g7jtRPRs/w-d-xo.html
So is Shaykh Fawzan a liar? Please respond. And no emergency vacations like your Ustad please
wow u ignaramous
MaaShaa Allaah. You finished with a challenge they will never dare to match. Very simple when you explained it because it’s the فطرة. This one Hadeeth can take them more than an hour to explain and they will still leave you in the dark after all.
الحمدلله على عقيدة أهل السنة والجماعة.
I honestly think you have become more handsome over time. May Allah bless you and preserve you.
Yeah he must be the handsomest wahabi in town. Usually wahabis are very ugly like that ultra wahabi dude philips who looks like shaytan himself.
You're kidding right..
@@imjustvisiting5397 Fear Allah سبحانه وتعالى!!!!!!! When u r criticizing his looks who r u actually criticizing? Did he create himself? Who created him then ??? ALLAH RABBUL IZZAH !!!! You r criticizing the creation of ur Rabb , over something he doesn't have any control of. Disgusting.
May Allah guide u.
Btw the brother is good looking , allahumma barik, n wht adds to it is his personality .
May Allah سبحانه وتعالى bless him & his family with goodness in this Duniya n Akhirah.
@Haze I never criticised his looks, but it seems that the bar is awfully low for what you consider good looking. Allah has created both beautiful people and below average looking people. This demonstrates Allah's infinite capacities as a creator. However, Abu Mussab is DEFINITELY NOT someone who is objectively good looking. Stop inflating his ego. He wears glasses like Jeffrey Dahmer. He doesn't have a full beard. He is bald and has no equal facial proportions. He has a weak jaw, crooked teeth and recessed chin. He has poor eye area. He is no Yusuf.
When I need a break from studying i tune in here…Mawlana 1 & 2 haha
th-cam.com/video/9n3g7jtRPRs/w-d-xo.html
So is Shaykh Fawzan a liar? Please respond. And no emergency vacations like your Ustad please
@@ViralSportsTV397 He already responded to it, why are you spamming the comment section.
هذا مدخلي وليس سلفي
@@notforyou1083 صح
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq this Lebanon person work with intelligence
Sorry but pointing out their English mistakes is not the same as the a Arabic mistakes. They are not giving lessons on English language and littetature. But the Arabic is relevant because it is directly linked to the Islamic language and the Arabic level required to read books of fiqh and Aqeedah. Its a matter of credential.
But I agree with your other points regarding mocking and beletting one another. It's not the islamic akhlaq
May Allah subhanawatala guide this two Mowlana to the right path .Ameen
they are upon the truth may ALLAH sbw guide the salafiyyah the lost sheep blind followers
@@thecuriousservant5549 Read the book Naqd ‘Uthmān ibn Sa’īd ‘alā Al-Marīsī Al-Jahmī Al-‘Anīd fīmā Iftarā ‘alā Allāh fī At-Tawhīd, so that your heart is liberated from your Jahmi Aqeedah, onto the Aqeedah of the muhadithseen from the Salaf.
Ameen
@@thecuriousservant5549 You lie my brother. Let's start with your elders of Deoband. Please explain why this tablighi is looking at non-mahram women.
*Baatil Karamaat no. 1 of Deobandis - The gaze of a Tableeghi on a pregnant woman could deliver a wali (instead of controlling his gaze)*
Tabish sahab writes that someone informed him that in the masjid of Maharashtra college (Bombay) once a jama`at came to conduct lessons/dars so this man also sat with this group. The speaker started praising this blessed work of tableegh and what they do until he said " the virtue of this blessed work is such that even if the one who goes out in it's path and lays his eyes upon a pregnant woman then she will give birth to a WALI due to his seeing" *(instead of controlling his gaze)*
[Ref: Kitab mazkuraa page 18]
@@thecuriousservant5549 Deobandi aqeeda is batil and kufr... am former deobandi...
If these mawlanas are so unhappy about the size and shape of your head, maybe they should have a talk with the one who created it?
Oh wait, they haven’t thought that far in their logic. Imagine belittling Allahs way of designing something.
Astaghfirullah
I completely disagree with maulana abdul haleem on this aspect. As you can see maulana uthmaan does not go into stuf like that. You must see their new clip. Accusations brother Abu Mussab has made of shaykh fawzaan.
They don't believe Allah speaks.
Hahahaha I love the way you replied these deobandis bcas as an Indian I used to surprise how deobandis easily Dodge Arabs with Thier lovely manners.... Subha Allah you made quite a good video and made non Arabs understand that how deobandis divert Thier own people from the true manhaj...I HV never heard the topic of Tawheed in Thier jamaaths and masaajid....I want to tell you one thing... I have seen that even those non salafi arabs support deobandis even though they knew deobandi manhaj is not according to rasoollullah. How surprising is that!!
Same I was a deobandi before. I am from Afghanistan and there is a lot deobandies there .
I was a Naqshabandi Sufi in my deviance day before Allah guided me to the Aqeedah of the Muhadithseen of the Salaf.
may Allah bless us all who turned to the truth and also keep us firm in his true deen, Alhamdulillah
Subhanallah me too, I was one of the rare Somali Deobandis making Dawah using the books of Ashraf Ali Thanvi and Paak Iqbal. That was until the abundant shirk and contradictions became clear to me. On one hand they deny Allah rising above on His Arsh while claiming one of their patron saint's pen rose above the Arsh.
@Hamza A yes they taught us a lot of deviant beliefs like the so called "6 kalimas * , kiss bread because it is "holy" we are created from wheat/bread and we descend from paradise because Adam and eve approached a pice of bread etc.. they teach a lot of kufr/shirk and biddah.
May Allah keep you smiling always 😊
Deo Bandits are more stubborn than shaitan
The shaytan is more stubborn.
@@Kayaniz_RLdon’t use images.
Ustadh, May Allah reward you with goodness. It's not good to make fun of them Barakallahu Feekum. Teach them by showing them good Akhlaq while answering their claims. Barakallahu Feekum. And Ustadh you shouldn't pay attention to these guys. Like for example, does Shaykh Al Allamah Saleh Al Fawzan do like this if someone made fun of him? The Shaykh May Allah preserve him doesnt even talk much. That is the sign of Ilm!
@Yunus Al Canaani Wa Alaykum Salam Wa Rahmathullahi Wa Barakathuhu
@onewaytoparadise the hadith challenge will be too much for them! 👌
You lost the plot bro i hope your followers see through you
Your molvis have lost the plot, they openly lie and go against the Sunnah. Yet you still blind follow these idiots. Go learn Islam and get off the interwebs.
If you read books of there elders you will be shocked what they see 😎 from unseen 😎
It's full of evil. Check this bizarre and unislamic quote from Deobandi books.
*Qasim Nanotwi returns from the dead*
Qasim Nanotwi coming back after death In “Arwah Ath-Thalathah” story n°247
It is written that a dispute occurred between Molvi Ahmad Hasan Sahib Amrohi and Molvi Fakhr ul Hasan Sahib Ganghohi, and Mahmud ul Hasan Deobandi took one side and entered the dispute, and this matter remained for a long time, so: “One morning after the prayer of Fajr, Maulana Rafi’ ud Din Sahib (rah) called Maulana Mahmud ul Hasan Sahib in his room (which is in Dar ul ‘Ulum Deoband) and Maulana came…the weather was very cold. Maulana Rafi’ud Din said: first look at my condition, and Maulana looked at his condition and he was wet (because of sweating), he said: The fact is that Maulana Nanotwi (rah) came with his physical body (Jasad ‘Unsuri) which made me sweat this much…and he asked Mahmud ul Hasan not to enter this dispute, so I called you only to tell you this. Maulana Mahmud ul Hasan said: Hazrat, I make Tawbah at your hand and after this I will not talk about this issue.
"Ashraf Ali Thanvi wrote in notes: “There can be two possibilities: one that it was a Mithali body which was resembling the physical (‘Unsuri) body, and the second possibility is that the soul did Tasarruf (some Sufi control) and prepared a physical (‘Unsuri) body.”
deobandhikaramaat.blogspot.com/2014/04/qasim-nanotwi-returns-from-dead-astala.html?m=1
example?
@@MrAddyan Check this bizarre and unislamic quote from Deobandi books.
*Qasim Nanotwi returns from the dead*
Qasim Nanotwi coming back after death In “Arwah Ath-Thalathah” story n°247
It is written that a dispute occurred between Molvi Ahmad Hasan Sahib Amrohi and Molvi Fakhr ul Hasan Sahib Ganghohi, and Mahmud ul Hasan Deobandi took one side and entered the dispute, and this matter remained for a long time, so: “One morning after the prayer of Fajr, Maulana Rafi’ ud Din Sahib (rah) called Maulana Mahmud ul Hasan Sahib in his room (which is in Dar ul ‘Ulum Deoband) and Maulana came…the weather was very cold. Maulana Rafi’ud Din said: first look at my condition, and Maulana looked at his condition and he was wet (because of sweating), he said: The fact is that Maulana Nanotwi (rah) came with his physical body (Jasad ‘Unsuri) which made me sweat this much…and he asked Mahmud ul Hasan not to enter this dispute, so I called you only to tell you this. Maulana Mahmud ul Hasan said: Hazrat, I make Tawbah at your hand and after this I will not talk about this issue.
"Ashraf Ali Thanvi wrote in notes: “There can be two possibilities: one that it was a Mithali body which was resembling the physical (‘Unsuri) body, and the second possibility is that the soul did Tasarruf (some Sufi control) and prepared a physical (‘Unsuri) body.”
Aqeedah mistakes of deobandis
1- They believe Allah is everywhere in everything
2- They believe in seeking blessings from graves
3- They deny attributes of Allah except for few
4- They separate actions from Iman
5- They believe prophet is alive so you can ask him to intercede and make dua which is Shirk
6- They don't know meaning of Lā Ilāha Ill-Allāh they translate it as no lord but Allah
7- They are fanatic hanafis , don't care about hadith
8- They believe in seeking tabarruk from "Saints"
9- They deny ahad hadith when it comes to Aqeedah
And many more
Majority that I have met don’t believe Allah is everywhere rather they believe Allah exists without a place. There’s an institure called Masjid Darussalam that promotes that and many come to study there from all over America
@@supersayain48 Darussalam is a Salafi publication house, except for a few books, other are correct. If you are talking about some other deobandi masjid named "Darussalam" than I don't know. Also, a little correction you made a mistake, most of the Deobandis belief is Allah is everywhere, as they are also Sufis as well, so they adopt Ibn Arabi, Aqeedah on that. As for not existing without a place, and that Allah is everywhere both are Jahmi beliefs which the Salaf refuted. So upon you is the way of the Muhadithseen from the Salaf, which is the Aqeedah of the Messenger of Allah, and his companions, and those who follow than in righteousness.
Imam Uthman Abū Sa’īd Ad-Darami said: The opposer also claimed that Allāh has no border, no extent and no end. And this is the foundation upon which Jahm built all of his misguidances, and from it he derived his dubious words in which one falls into error. And it is a saying regarding which, it has not reached us that anyone from all of the worlds has ever said this before Jahm.
So someone having a conversation with him said: “I verily know what you intend
with (saying) this, O you non-Arab. You mean that Allāh is nothing. Because all of the creation knows that ‘nothing’ is what is said about the thing which has no border, no extend and no end. And that ‘nothing’ does not have a border, an extent, an end, nor a description. So ‘something’ will always have a description without any exception, while ‘nothing’ is described (as being) without a border and without an end. And your saying: ‘He has no border’, means that He is nothing.”
Imam Uthman Abū Sa’īd Ad-Darami than said: And Allāh has a border which no-one knows about except Him. And it is not allowed for anyone to falsely imagine in himself the end of His border, rather we believe in the border and we entrust the knowledge regarding it to Allāh. And there is also a border to His location, and He is upon the Throne above His heavens. So those are two borders.
And ‘Abdullāh ibn Al-Mubārak was asked: “How do we know our Lord?” He said:
“Upon the Throne, separated from His creation.” It was said: “By a border?” He said: “By a border.”
It is sahīh. It was narrated by the author in “Ar-Radd ‘alā Al-Jahmiyyah” (162), ‘Abdullāh ibn Ahmad in “As-Sunnah” (216), Al-Bayhaqī in “Al-Asmā was-Sifāt” (902) and Ibn ‘Abdil-Barr in “At-Tamhīd” (7/142) by ways from ‘Alī ibn Al-Hasan ibn Shaqīq.
Verily did (both) the word of the Muslims and the disbelievers agree upon that
Allāh is in heaven, and they described Him as such, except the misguided AlMarīsī and his companions. Even the young boys who have not yet reached the
age of responsibility verily know Him as such. When something befalls the
young boy he raises his hands to his Lord and invokes Him in heaven besides
everything else. So everyone knows more about Allāh and His location than the
Jahmiyyah.
(Naqd ‘Uthmān ibn Sa’īd ‘alā Al-Marīsī Al-Jahmī Al-‘Anīd fīmā Iftarā ‘alā Allāh fī At-Tawhīd).
Think you are mistaken with brevlis my brother
Those are Barelwi beliefs.
Some people are another kind of thick.
It is so funny when you're mimicking their accent 🤣
Toubah toubah in that Indian accent smashed it 😂😂😂
Do you guys know Surah Al Hujurat?
@@hmzzrg5045 exactly, these guys both state we will take the higher road, then both of them start attacking each other and mocking
And I consider both of these groups of people traditionalists. Abu musab outright made tabdi on them with no authority to do that. Rabi madkhali doesn't even call saved qutb an innovator!
@@stadiamak692 I have already responded to this.
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq you "responding" doesn't mean anything. You're just deluding yourself, you will come on the day of judgement with all the slander and accusations you've made against us of tabdi3 and other things.
When cousins marry endlessly through the generations you get Bradford. Khalas.
Spot on😅
Mocking the Indian accent is racism.
You should be ashamed of yourself Abu Mussab!
Tbh, every Indian don't have that accent
every mawlanas should be ashamed of themselves. 😂 bunch of idiots.
Indian accent is least of the Indian issues.
Can you make a video about the disagreements you have with Sh Uthman ? I benefited alot from his classes, I'd like to know if I learned something wrong. BarakAllahou fik.
Asalamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullah,
May Allah bless you and aid you in seeking the truth.
The differences between Ustadh Abu Mussab and Shaykh Uthman are differences between two brothers upon Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah wa Salafiyyah, these are differences between brothers and their approaches in dawah and what they see as appropriate and inappropriate in methodology etc.
And this is pretty much the extent, so akhi Al Kareem do not worry too much about it, always remember we do not attach ourselves to individuals and we go where daleel is, every individual will make mistakes, but the question is always what is the extent of the mistake, is it in usool/aqidah or in furooh.
و الله اعلم
My 2 favorite da'ees alhamdulillah
@@Genny2494 Uthman praised the sufi mansoor hallaj fanboy tariq masud heavily Naoozubillah
@@AnonymousAkh Assalamualaikum, jazaakallahu khayran. I have the same thought actually. Will it be okay for us to know in which things they differ to one another? Could you explain if it’s okay
@@AnonymousAkh uthman Ibn Farooq is not a shaykh at all, wallahi you people are so ignorant, he is no where near a sheikh, he can't even read the Qur'an properly without distorting, he can't even read Surah Al fatiha.
Let the Mawlanas read this…
Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The believer does not insult others, he does not curse others, he is not vulgar, and he is not shameless.”
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 1977
Let this channel act upon this Hadith
@ahmadhanbal8497 True Akhi.
Only wahabis can isult other people
@@doctorsnuggles3299 The irony 😂
@@affan639
No, that's double standard
Be proud Ustadz Abu Musab because they needed to watch hundreds of your videos to find those minute mistakes. May Allah guide these two maulanas eating halwa into correct Aqeedah.
th-cam.com/video/9n3g7jtRPRs/w-d-xo.html
So is Shaykh Fawzan a liar? Please respond. And no emergency vacations like your Ustad please
Please stop spamming Ustadh has already responded to it in the above comment section.
This means these two mall ananas are learning aqeedah from aqeedatul wasitiyyah ...lol
@@ziasmailbox They had volunteers go through his videos not them lol, also aqeedatul wasitiyyah? the same one that ascribes to Allah two real literal eyes with no evidence from Qur'an and sunnah??
@@unknown-808 read Surah Sa’ad 38 verse 75 and tell me what it says
Let the Mawlanas read this…
Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, a man might speak a word to make those around him laugh, yet by it he plunges farther than the star of Pleiades.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 9220
Maybe they love you so much that they can't stop talking about you Brother
He said something about your beautiful head with the sunnah cut? 😂 Allahu musta3aan.
I’m jealous that you have that amazing-shaped head in a good way. May Allah bless it for you.
May Allah mold your head slowly into that shape so your jealousy is lifted (genuine dua and not a curse)
JazakAllah Khayr.
Time to go for an emergency vacation mate 😂
Your frustrated smile is telling us how much you frustrated on your mistakes
WAllahi u could make all mistaCes u want in language. I thank Allah that they're in the language and not the aqeedah and meeting Allah with that.. May Allah safeguard us.
The hate is so evident in all of their videos it’s only because of the difference of the Aqeedah they have.
*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_*
*DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!*
That is true.
th-cam.com/video/9n3g7jtRPRs/w-d-xo.html
So is Shaykh Fawzan a liar? Please respond. And no emergency vacations like your Ustad please
@@ViralSportsTV397 Please stop spamming Ustadh has already responded to it in the above comment section.
Firqah Najiya also exposed these deoband jealous failures.
Mashallah, you admit to your mistakes and correct your mistakes. Unlike them, they refuse to correct their mistakes. And they will continue doing bidah
You are right, they are too arrogant.
The fact that you are on TH-cam and your peers is a bidah in and of itself. You are a wannabe Desert Rat mentally living in the medieval period.
Bidha, bidha, fool.
@@hampshireconnoly675 Come on brother, if you cannot be academical regarding your answer, best to remain silent. I don't think you understand Bid'ah in the Deen and Bid'ah in the Dunya.
@@ExtremeShez
I will be academic to those with a level of intellect. This individual on the other hand is very insulting, and condescending, therefore he requires such a response. Now giving dawah is an integral part of the deen, and the prophet and his companions did not give dawah using TH-cam therefore according to his logic this is a huge bida. This is the issue this individual, and his alike take things to extremes and literally think they can live the same as 1400 years ago in the Arabian desert.
@@hampshireconnoly675 I'm confused as to how you think his logic is that TH-cam is a bid’ah, what did he say to give you that impression? I think you're wrong but I'm willing to be corrected, in shaa Allah.
As the two molvis are extremist in their ideology which is why they need to be refuted.
Asalamualaykum Abu Musab.
Not sure I am changing my views fully to align with yours but I know one thing. You are definitely sincere my brother keep it up.
I use to maybe not think well of you but you do not faff around alhamdulillah.
Keep outing these wrongens please.
th-cam.com/video/9n3g7jtRPRs/w-d-xo.html
So is Shaykh Fawzan a liar? Please respond. And no emergency vacations like your Ustad please
He's our salafi brother... Following his channel from 2018 ... Alhamdulillah...
May Allah bless him immensely... And forgive his mistakes if there are .. Aameen
th-cam.com/video/9n3g7jtRPRs/w-d-xo.html
I have experience bro. Believe me, when people mock your appearance, 1000% its due to the fact you look very handsome/pretty, but they are JEALOUS.
Brother, you look very handsome - Mashallah, so let haters hate lol. Btw your videos are extremely motivative and funny =)
23:53 "Ya mussab, baba, come they are talking about you"🤣😭🤣😭
Please reply the timestamp
@@AdhelAlSalafi 23:57
Actually you can say إلى توحيدُ الربوبية if we combine the two words as one (اسم). I studied النحو some twenty years ago and I still know that. ولكن العداوة تُعمي البصر
This video reminds me of how Christian priest used to fight
Had this not been a refutation of their deviance, abu mussab ain't lying about the roasting thing lool. We lebanese come with very heavy artillery when we dont wanna hold back
The halwa has returned boys. 'shab e barat is near and it's a common innovation to eat halwa and roti on that day specially and to spread it amongst the neighborhood. But it's widespread. So Shaban in the subcontinent is halwa season.' time for some juicy halwa eating content.
Why don't you go to Saudi to lick the feet of MBS?
I agree bid'ah is wrong, but unless you've witness them in that bid'ah, you cannot judge them. And most deobandis are against these kinds of bid'ah.
But looking at you, you're a typical pseudo salafi, a troll. So it's useless to speak with you.
Abu musab called them innovators, what gives him the authority to do that?
This will always be funny Looll
@Stadia Mak he's calling them innovators bc thats what they are.
Lol deobandis don’t believe in this
Delete this man, The Sunnah is to defend the Religion, not one's own reputation. Allah is the Best Disposer of your affairs so let Him deal with them, you've done enough to refute them اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ. Take the advice of your seniors and the other part of yourself that you mentioned at the beginning.
I said this before, this feels too much like a Muhammad Hijab video.
وفقك الله لما يحب ويرضى.
True, but I mean, we all already know this video is not academic and just for fun
@@nahimwasit I refuse to believe Brother Abu Mus'ab did this for 'fun'. Deen is not amusement, akhi. InShaAllah I'm ignorant on this and proven wrong, but this Is not from the Sunnah of RasulAllah ﷺ or the Salaf to name-call and make fun of Muslims, and defend oneself in such a way, be they on the verge of Kufr. The Prophet ﷺ only allowed his nephew to do so to the Kuffar at his time. InShaAllah the better path is to let them die in their Rage and misguidance after it has been made clear to the masses sufficiently and the Hujjah has been established on them.
@OneWayToParadise
والله اعلم.
@@pursueexcellence7737 I agree with you
But to be frank these Bandis don’t deserve attention since we know them to be liars and feeble minded
You're awesome.... At baseless criticism. It's like watching high school children bicker.
Gone are the days where humility was exemplified by those with knowledge. End of days.
This is the best comment on here... that by a Patel!
Ha the irony of this comment.
Search for "Zahid Patel". A top salafi speaker / debater from India.
And if you know the surname Patel (your comment suggests you do), you should know that they are names of Muslims as well. Don't behave like fools just because you are aligned towards something.
Seek forgiveness from Allah SWT, make taubah from sectarianism and go focus on your own deeds.
What a pointless video. Shaykh should have spent his time producing something meaningful rather than addressing critics and fuelling more division.
I watch both channels and see Alislam productions managed to prove their points.
Alislam productions have exposed so many people
You are bigger emotional tool than they are! bravo! now take the trophy home and enjoy!
The scholars are the inheritors of the Prophets, in knowledge and in akhlaaq and character. These individuals akhlaaq is more like that of Iblees and Abu Lahab. If these are the people you look up to, you might as well book your seat in Jahannam already.
@@meelash1 yes their adab reflects a lot. Looks like they might have some knowledge but they have failed to implement even 1% of the knowledge that the quran and the sunnah gives us about akhlaq. Their deobandis founders have corrupted aqeedah and used to associate with sufis and barelwis yet they are unaware of it. They fail to pronounce simple arabic.
@@hamzanocap how is their akhlaq bad? They show true passion for defending the Qur'an and trying to help the Muslims away from being deceived by juhal who call themselves shaykh and muftis when they can't even read Arabic or even the Qur'an properly, they expose frauds and especially the salafies who claim to be people of knowledge when they're not. Their shuyukh say things about Allah with literally no knowledge. They online figure heads such as uthman literally copy pasted from other Arabic books and tried to pass it off as his own, they dress up like shuyukh to lie and fool the people, they're frauds. This guy is trying to mock their English thinking he really did something. Their English is perfectly fine, you can hear it clearly and they can speak it, nothing wrong with it, and on top of that, it's probably their 3rd or 4th language, what does Abu mussab know? How to break the Arabic language? May Allah guide us
@@hamzanocap Ulamas job to expose people like wakkari who use bad language. u cna book yours there in jahannam since u cant c pass ur ego and his. watch both channels and then decide. dont be a blind follwoers. salafiyyah r known for their stupidity but cant take criticism hahahha
Islam is Quran and Sunnah upon the way of salaf.
If you really want to see the "sincerity" of these two individuals, you should check out the condition that they put to remove the video that they made regarding Shiekh Uthman's mistakes.
They put the condition that they would remove the video if Shiekh Uthman stops speaking about deobandis, and I was absolutely blown away seeing where allegiance of these two individuals lie and what they are "sincere" to.
Had they been sincere in their claims to put out the video because they care about Qur'an being recited incorrectly, like they show it out to be, they wouldn't have accepted to take down the video at any condition since the recitation of the Qur'an is at question here.
However, they are willing to take down the video if Shiekh Uthman stops talking about deobandis. SubhanAllah.
This shows where their allegiance, "sincerity" and priorities are.
MashaAllah brother well said
No, you've got it all wrong. They originally had an agreement, in the beginning they were gonna keep it up regardless of anything, but then other people in the community were telling them that uthman was giving dawah and Christians were gonna use this against him, so they were asked by other people to take it down for the sake of the dawah. They didn't agree to take it down if he doesn't speak about deobandi scholars at all, they in fact told that jahil uthman to not talk about Scholars and imams of this religion and calling them deviants and so on as uthman was going on attacking so many of the previous scholars and their beliefs, including many big names like imam nawawi and others, this is what upset them, the deobandi part had nothing to do with the agreement, uthman just said he was willing to sit and challenge any deobandi so they offered him to sit which he ran away from obviously. Uthman started the attacking first by attacking major Islamic scholars of the past, claiming they had deviated aqeedas and that they didn't know Allah and believed kufri things, the brothers could've just ignored the whole thing but they also thought of the dawah that was given and came to an agreement. Uthman himself did agree to this but then broke it when he came to the UK.
@@Ryan-lf6ds
And? How does that contradict what I said about the "sincerity" and allegiance of these two individuals to their sect, rather than what they show it for?
If you really think you are going to dodge it by making me defend Shiekh Uthman then you are mistaken. Shiekh Uthman has made mistakes in regards to language and he should be corrected on it, but not by the "I scratch your back and I scratch yours" approach of these two individuals who prioritise their sect.
@@Ryan-lf6ds
Of course you had to show your upbringing through your words, without caring about the fact that Allah is watching and you will be answerable to Allah about what you say.
@@Ryan-lf6ds
Yes, I can definitely see that you have been doing this from a very young age. How else would one not fear Allah even after being reminded of answering Allah on the day of judgment?
I appreciate you bringing such misguidance to light. Insha’allah these videos will bring people out of this ignorance. That being said I’ve never encountered such people Alhamdullilah. It was very shocking hearing him shriek such horrific things about our beloved Prophet (P.B.U.H). I can’t continue watching the video. I’ve liked it though so insha’allah this will reach more people with bizarre understandings of the deen. Jazakallah khair.
th-cam.com/video/9n3g7jtRPRs/w-d-xo.html Look, your shiekh fawzan has literally said the same thing about the prophet peace be upon him. you people don't even read what your own shuyukh say. May Allah guide us.
@@unknown-808 Don't lie about him, Ya Jahmi. Because of your ignorance.
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq instead of the insults and the false slander that you have no evidence of, show us a refutation. Salam.
@@unknown-808 👍
@@unknown-808 can you explain the kufriyat of your elders.
"You and me is Shirk upon Shirk”
In the English translation of ‘Irshaadul Mulook[1], Zakariya Kandhalwi mentioned in his introduction, a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah Al-Makki:
"O my refuge of both worlds! You have requested information about the halat (condition) of this useless one... I have developed a natural dislike for sin and a natural inclination for obedience. This effect is due solely to that relatiotiship (nisbat) which has reached me from the spiritual effulgence of Hadhrat. To say more will be disrespectful. May Allah forgive that I be a liar, for I have written on the instruction of Hadhrat. In reality I am nothing. It is only Your Shadow - only Your existence (i.e. Allah’s existence). What am I? I am nothing. Only He is. You and me are Shirk upon Shirk." [End quote]
So affirming two existences is Shirk for these people, and creation is only the ‘shadow’ of Allah... Astaghfirullah!! Also, Gangohi called Imdadullah “refuge of both worlds,” when only Allah can provide refuge to a person in both worlds, yet these people seek refuge in the creation instead of the Rabb of all that exists. And here Gangohi clearly stated he is a liar, in reference to their hiding their creed of Wahdahtul Wujood in order to preserve themselves from attack!
[1] Page 20, published by Majlisul Ulama of South Africa. This letter is also quoted by Zakariya Kandhalwi in his “Fazail Sadaqat, part 2, chapter 6: Ahadith- The excellence of Tawakkul, after Hadith 10
I tried to give this brothers a chance, he attacks whilst being riddled with shortcomings of his own. Don't get me started on a khutbah he gave where he openly called for cursing Muslim drug dealers and making du'a for them to burn in hellfire. We all make mistakes and those of us who sincerely repent have been guided to leave that which displeases our Lord, and call to good. Why couldn't he just make a du'a for such people?
He laughs at brothers for mistakes they make in their Arabic (like Brother Shamsi and Shaykh Uthman ibn Farooq), claiming they shouldn't be in a position to teach or give knowledge, when the fact was after watching everyone's videos, the most benefits were found in the videos of the brothers they mock, where as their "al islam productions" channel just incited hatred and un-just, arrogant belittlement of others who are genuinely doing good works.
May Allaah 'azza wa jall guide us all and have mercy on us.
These brothers* before I get a whole refutation video on my mistakes made against me...
@@nod.coffee Just give them books of Imam Uthman Abi Sa'id Ad-Darami, he refutes all of there deviant belief. One of the deviant belief of the Maturidis is Allah is One but not in number.
@@nod.coffee akhi if you click on the 3 dots next to the comment, you can insha'Allah edit the comment instead of writing another one under it
They ( AllIslamProduction ) should learn islam before looking for the mistake of others because they commit kufr openly.
Curse be upon those so-called Muslims who poison society with khamr in all its forms, may there skin and bones be fuel for the Hellfire.
The topic of the channel is "1 way to paradise" not "1 way to arguments with people I don't like"
Check the other thousand videos and be fair.
Brother why u Try doing the Indian accent???
Because he can.
Very weak response brother
*Baatil Karamaat no. 1 of Deobandis - The gaze of a Tableeghi on a pregnant woman could deliver a wali (instead of controlling his gaze)*
Tabish sahab writes that someone informed him that in the masjid of Maharashtra college (Bombay) once a jama`at came to conduct lessons/dars so this man also sat with this group. The speaker started praising this blessed work of tableegh and what they do until he said " the virtue of this blessed work is such that even if the one who goes out in it's path and lays his eyes upon a pregnant woman then she will give birth to a WALI due to his seeing" *(instead of controlling his gaze)*
[Ref: Kitab mazkuraa page 18]
Abu Mussab is in TROUBLE. 😯His excellenct "Arabic" is getting exposed. He is getting refuted but his die-hard fans are in stubborn denial.
Watch each other's responses without holding any biases.
Agreed
Brother, do you yourself know Arabic?
If you know then please teach me.
Kulloo nafsin za'ikatul mawt
The Maulanas of Bradford. 🤣
Hahaha.. this guy is so salty.... 🤣
He wants to cry 😂😭..
Ustadh, better disable comments. Nobody is free of error. comments can be unnecessary baggage on the day of judgement as you are giving them a platform. Sincere advice, leave them and address their errors without naming them. You have done enough to warn against them. Continue your noble work of teaching works of scholars. May Allah bless you and increase you in ranks.
You know who wouldn't do something like you said? Someone who has ego the size of a mountain.
They will probably ignore your challenge at the end
These are people of desires, they have ignored the guidance of Allah, of the correct belief of the Salaf.
So they are the deprived ones.
Looking at both sides, Allah help us to make sure we do things for your pleasure only and help us control our tongue and from reacting due to anger.
Abdulrahman Dimashqia made 2 videos about the same hadith. Really worth a watch, especially the arabic!
Link please akhi
Love the sheikh for the sake of Allah
@@babahadjimohamed9339 Arabic version: th-cam.com/video/9Vnxf2CpDCU/w-d-xo.html
English version: th-cam.com/video/GH9xEyjGa_Q/w-d-xo.html
Arabic is wayyy better. Enjoy habeebi!
@@iimiboy May Allah protect and preserve him and Abu Musab. Lebanese salafis both of which have an incredibly sense of humour!
@@ExposingAhlulBidah ameen, sheikhs recitation is beautiful aswell, used to love watching his lectures and debates with deviants like deobandhis and brelvis also miss him in speakers corner, he's been going there for a very late time
It is possible for prophets to be alive in their graves. I am a Salafi by the way, but there is no running away from this Hadith: “The dead infants of the believers are in a mountain in Jannah whereby they are being taken care of by Ibrahim Alayhisalam and Sarah until they are given back to their parents on Yawm al-Qiyyamah.”
Yes, the Prophets of Allah عليهم السلام are Alive, but this life is not like our life, this is called by RasulAllah ﷺ as the Barzakhi life in authentic Ahadith. This does not fulfil the first condition of Du'a/Istighaatha - That the Person who the being asked is Alive in this life.
@@pursueexcellence7737 Did I say that it did? I am just saying that we cannot deny the fact that it is possible for prophets to be a alive in their graves.
@@peacezorro5701 Not attacking you, akhi. Not even sure what you're referring to with "Did I say I did?". Was just passing in some info.
@@peacezorro5701Brother this is Usool ad-Deen possibility is not certainty and in Aqeedah there is no place for Rai, As was mentioned by Imam Humaydhi and Imam Ahmed in there books Usool as-Sunnah.
@@peacezorro5701 Go through the relevant Aqeedah classes again from the playlist.
Let the Mawalanas read this…
Aisha reported: I said to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, “Such is enough for Safiyyah,” making fun of her short stature. The Prophet said, “You have said a word that would pollute the water of the sea if mixed with it.”
Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4875
Should apply to this channel. Alislam productions put this channel on place and now they getting attacked.
@@thecuriousservant5549
Maalik Bin Deenaar [rahimahullaah] said,
"O people! Indeed, when gold and silver are presented to a dog, it does not know what they are, but if a bone is presented, it moves toward it. Likewise, the foolish people amongst you do not know truth".
[Hilyatul Awliyaa 1/419]
I would advise you to sit with the scholars and learn from their manners, Abu Mussab. I would advise the followers of Abu Mussab to not encourage him to make these sorts of videos.
But refuting the Ahul-Bidah is also importsnt.
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pqas alfawzan said its for scholars
They are ahlyl biddah maulanas. Abu musab is right.
What next is Rasullallah doing so fourth in his grave. I can't stop laughing at this maulana.
He mocks your Arabic, but at least you sound like an Arab when you speak Arabic, unlike some…
It doesnt mattter about sounding like an arab, its about getting the grammar correct, you wouldve only know that if you studied
What’s sad is apart from any sincere knowledge that you guys share transmit from all sides share all well & good , but both are bad as each other with the mocking and that , also the racial sly under tone remarks is very sad and bad , I sense that or it gives me the impression that because you’re an Arab you seem to take the high ground , I get it two non Arabs questioning you’re Arabia لغة العربية etc may anger you , but the sly racial mocking undertones where I’ve seen it before from you smh , also plz don’t think for a second that I am with the other two brothers or something nah no way , anyway sad very sad to see this sort of animosity and backwards and forwards rather than focus on actual DAWAH anyway I can go on but man as a Muslim who has roots from Bangladesh but was born in the uk , the sly racial mocking undertones made me feel bad and sad , also online no matter who you are other ppl will criticise mock take apart your opinion, it’s the way it goes no need to take it personally and cross red lines .!!!!!
Also Now you mocking the English word of his like you didn’t like him doing in Arabic but in Arabic and matters deen must be cleared and rectified and generally most of the sincere ppl know a slip of the tongue etc is not some sort of intentional way to mislead anyone , also those two brothers are from up north of the uk and have a northern accent nothing to really mock publicly anyway I find it sad and distasteful and very un-Islamic lacking of حكمة Hikmah , also I’m not 100% sure but sheikh Uthman just ignores them which is classy move by him not seen him bite to their antics .!!!! السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته أخي
Also disclaimer all you brothers are much more knowledgeable than I am I’m just sharing my opinion on the approach hikmah of the delivery etc… nothing more I love u all for the sake of Allah swt
There is no racial slur at all. I always imitate the Egyptians for their heavy accent and we all find it entertaining. So I am an Arab who is racist against my people?
@@OneWayToParadise Brother as someone from the Asian community your Muslim brother I’m telling you in these type of videos this is what I sense and feel from you , just for context I know Br Shamsi , and all the brothers from Speakers corner , my main channel is called OSCC#DAWAH , I’ve been away from the park and online for a while now not been active as such but planning on coming back , I will do a reaction video if I have time to point them out what makes me feel or what I mean , trust me bro it comes from ur end that oh I’m an Arab and you guys are not , anyway I will point it out then maybe you will get what I mean , also I am getting so confused to take knowledge from whom with every group etc saying they are wrong and on the incorrect AQEEDAH عقيدة / Manhaj etc unfortunately the DAWAH is confusing after watching these videos , I prayed to Allah swt and asked Oh Allah swt who is on the correct Islam as all this is so confusing anyway brother may Allah swt bless u and us all and guide us all Ameen
@@OneWayToParadise I made some typo’s so I edited my original comment IA There maybe more as it’s late in the uk I should be sleeping very tired if I have time I will correct it again if there is more mistakes , typo’s etc …
@@SyedReacxts The answer is marinate yourself with the books of the Salaf, in the case of every dispute return to them. And take knowledge from those who propagate the way of the Salaf, from the books of the Salaf.
@@SyedReacxts akhi the salaf are the ones on the correct aqeedah. Don't study from ahlul bid'ah like deobandis,sufis,maturidis,jahmites,shias. Study the books of the salaf the scholars of the 4 madhabs and you can clearly see from their behaviour that who are on the correct aqeedah. Tawheed Promoter has exposed these deobandis multiple times.
Lol I couldn't watch the whole video..those brothers need help..May Allaah guide them. But you have a very nice shaped head brother. May Allaah bless you.
May Allah guide these brothers. They must have spent countless hours going through all your videos trying to nitpick and find Arabic grammar mistakes. It’s embarrassing. I feel sorry for their followers
Subxaanalaaah.
When we speaking , we all make some unintentional mistakes, even if you have highest degree in the Arabic .
I believe these two brothers have some other issues with brother أبو مصعب.
🧐
Wallaahi you are funnier than they could ever be. By the way I am non Arab Muslim and I believe all people who call to Allaah should learn all the Makhaarij as best as they can
Yaaa abu mussab I love you so much ustadh, you are the funniest dude in the world man 😂😂😂😂 you and shamsi from dus dawah y’all got jokes for days 😂😂😂 the funniest salafies in the dawah wallahi lol
"you become too open minded that your brain fell out!" Classic one from Shamsi 😂
A Dozen Double standards of Wahhabi Cult Members:
1. When Shaykh Fawzaan describes the condition of the Prophet (SAW) in his grave, it is haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does it, it is baatil.
2. When Salafi shaykhs base fundamentals of aqeedah on fabricated hadeeth (such as "sitting"), it is haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) cites even a slightly weak hadeeth in a secondary fiqh matter it is totally baatil.
3. When Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin describes Allah as "wearing clothes" (a verb that cannot even be found in a fabricated hadeeth), it is haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) said something baseless it is baatil.
4. When Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin claims that sifaat of Allah such as "Ridaa" are temporal and caused by creation, it is haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) affirms that Allah's qualities are permanent he is still a jahmi, upon baatil.
5. When Abu Mussab mocks and insults it is sincerity, good manners, and haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does it, it is insincerity, bad manners, and baatil.
6. When Abu Mussab makes shocking basic Arabic mistakes (even with common words, let alone case endings), he is still proficient and knowledgeable-upon haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does it he is a jaahil, upon baatil.
7. When Abu Mussab makes false allegations he is upon haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does so he is a liar, upon baatil.
8. When a Wahhabi runs away from a challenge or debate, it is because he doesn't want to waste his time-despite being in the haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does so, it is because he doesn't have sound evidence and is upon baatil.
9. When a Wahhabi makes takfeer of tabdee' of other Muslims, without evidence (as Abu Mussab has done in his comments here), then he is upon haqq. If a Deobandi (or any non-Wahhabi) does so, then he is slandering and is upon baatil.
10. Wahhabi shuyookh are always upon haqq, even if the evidences indicate otherwise. Deobandis (or any non-Wahhabis) are always upon baatil, regardless of their sound evidences.
11. When Wahhabis go against ijmaa and attribute "silence" to Allah, it is haqq. If a Deobandi does so (or any non-Wahhabi), he is negating Allah's speech-a certain Mutazili and Jahmi-upon baatil.
12. When Shaykh Fawzaan says that every authentic, ahad hadeeth is qati'iyy, he is upon haqq. If a Deobandi ( or any non-Wahhabi) said so then he does not know elementary usoolul-fiqh and is upon baatil.
Wahhabi motto: This inconsistent manhaj is always haqq, especially if the truth is otherwise.
May Allah guide these Wahhabis to the true manhaj of the Salaf.
Disclaimer: Before anyone has a panic attack, the term, "Wahhabi", as defined by Shaykh Ibn Baz, refers to the followers of Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab. Also, there is clear proof for every attribution that is made to Wahhabi shuyookh here.
The people of innovation and misguidance are allies of one another. We seek refuge with Allah from them.
good work.
Inshort They are hypocrite.
😂😂 stupid deobandi babas, writing things without any proof,
1. I never seen shaykh saalih al fawzaan speaking of unseen things which aren't mentioned in the quran and sunnah ,where is your daleel for the first point ,
And the remaining points Mr Deobandi Baba ji,you haven't provided any Daleel. Just wasted your time writing all these points as if , people of haq going to read it and change their path to deviance.
Go get some life babaji
22:09 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This is too funny 😂 deflating a tyre
We love you Abu mussab from the Kashmiri and Pakistani community from alhe hadith in England , the innovators hate always comes
Out with there mockery and poor manners
True brother, likewise respect from Lahore.
Bro, go back and do takhreej of barbahari share as sunna. He was wicked in hadith yet you use his reports for aqidah. Clowns
@@stadiamak692 Ya Jahil. We the Salafi has hundreds of the books of the Salaf as our evidence. As for Imam Barbahari, he was a known Imam of the Sunnah, what is mentioned in Tabaqat Al-Hanabilla by Imam Qadhi Abu Yala, as for the the chain of narration which include Ghulaam Khaleel, than that man do you know what he was known for, because of which the Muhadithseen graded him as a liar, it was lying on the Messenger of Allah to soften the heart of the people, meaning he was a Sufi. However, scholars of Takhreej has said, that name was inserted later due to malign the authenticity of Sharah Sunnah. As Imams like Shaykh ul-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, Imam adh-Dhahabi, Imam Ibn Muflih, Imam as-Safadee, Imam Ibn Hajar, Imam Ibn al-Imaad, and Imam Suyuti as well, has ascribed it to Imam Barbahari. And the evidence for it are many.
Once such evidence is the author writing this line, Everything that I have described to you in this book is from Allah, the Most High, from
the Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam), from his Companions, from the Tabi’een and from the third generation to the fourth. And Ghulaam Khaleel died in (275 A.H), so how can it be from the forth. This is a very strong point.
Another strong point is Imam Ibn Kaamil died in the year (350 A.H) and as has preceded Imam Barbahari who died (329 A.H). So perhaps due to the persecution of Imam Barbahari and his students by the rulers lead to some of the scribers to change the name of the author for fear that they would be seized and punished.
@@stadiamak692 We the Salafis has hundreds of books like Sharah Sunnah to prove our point. Do You think that there is much difference of Sharah Sunnah of Imam Muzani, or Al-Shariah of Imam Ajjuri, or Al-Ibanna of Ibn Battah, or the the Kitab as-sunnah by Imam Abdullah ibn Ahmed, or Kitab Al-Sunnah of Imam Ibn Harb ibn Ismail Al-Karmani, or the Aqeedah Raziyyan of the two Imam, or the books of Imam Uthman Abi Sa'id Ad-Darami, which are ample, or Usool as-sunnah of Imam Humaydhi or Imam Ahmed, or Kitab At-Tawheed of Imam Ibn Khuzaymah or Al-Haiyyah of Imam Abi Dawood, etc, and the Sharah Sunnah of Imam Barbahari.
He made me laugh sarcastically describing your head 8:50 that was funny. I thought we were talking علم not Allah’s creation 😂😂😂Wallaahi people have become blind because they are following someone regardless
Sheikh you not easy wlhy😂😂😂😂 you actually more brutal than them😭💔😂 Astaqfirullah
Good they played your video at the end, maybe they'll learn something and their followers too. Free advertisement
I thought you were advised by a senior student of knowledge/ sheikh to not engage in these videos of refutation? At least I remember you saying that in one of your recent ones. Wise decision I thought but here you are again. Lowe these wastemen! No one is giving them any attention except a few and you are giving them more attention than they deserve. Also- the stupidity that these people display is on another level and it won't end..trust me.
Yes, as they are pure example of People of desires, and the likes of those which hearts are sealed from the guidance of Allah.
Akhi make sure you don’t fall into backbiting.
@ahmadhanbal8497 That is correct.
@ahmadhanbal8497 ther might be an aiqdah benefit here to protect from the ppl of bida and doubts so let's see if we can find it. Bismillah!
Why you gonna randomly flick through it Abu musab, go through everything, if your so brave
Did you really write “if your so brave”? Lol. Bashing Abu Musab for his grammar when you, yourself can’t even write simple English. I guess it’s human to make mistakes huh?!
@@Luna_87A tbf who’s gona take from someone who has a head tattoo and shaves his beard and makes mistakes which change meaning of Qur’aan.
Haq is with the people who persevere the ilm especially Qur’aan.
Not reading with rules and proper Tajweed says alot about the person.
you made a bloonder there at the end with your earpiece 😂
Madkhali on fire 😁😁😁Time to speak about the kufr and deviations promoted by the Khawarij rulers in Arabian peninsula rather than making fun of Arabic accents of non-Arabs. The Madkhali Wajdi Akkiri may not be aware that many of the teachers in the Islami University in MEdina used to be and still are from the sub continent.
The only mubtadi buzzword you're missing there is Wahhabi, perhaps in doing so you are slightly less misguided.
@@hamzanocap Sheikh Abdul Wahab was right about a lot of things and was wrong about certain things. He isn’t infallible. He was perhaps not well versed in politics and thus was used by petty power hungry rulers. The rulers themselves never held back from rebelling against the unified Ottoman Muslim state with all its defects. But the palace scholars of these rulers don’t utter a word against the rulers allying with Zionists and Hindus and instead brands the righteous scholars who speaks against these deviances as Khawarij. These rulers are the Khawarij who broke the muslim unity.
@@SS-kg8qw Rather than focus on nonsensical political waffle ( that Allah will hold you accountable for), perfect your Salah and recitation of the Qur'an, Ramadhan is only a couple weeks away. May Allah guide you to the straight path.
@@SS-kg8qw At least get the name of the scholar you are trying to mention right, O genius who. The Sheikh name was Muhammad his father name was Abdul Wahhab.
@@SS-kg8qw Just like these Jahmiyyah from the Deobandiyyah are blind to the narrations of the Messenger of Allah, you guys influenced by "the Sitters" methodology, you guys are also blind to all of the narrations mentioned in Al-Shariah of Ajjuri, or Al-Ibanna of Ibn Batta, or Sharah Usool Al-Atiqad of Imam Ibn Zaid Al-Lalakaee.
Those 2 brothers make more videos on Sh uthman and other people than what they believe in! I don't get it if people are questioning your beliefs then make rebuttal videos rather than finding mistakes of others! So basically they are acknowledging what others think of deobandis!
Assalaamulaikum brother could you possibly remove the echo in your audio please, its difficult to listen with it JazakAllahu khair
nc exposing!
You make a good point
23:50 till 25:00... 😭😭😭🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂
Just going on about a irrelevant rant lmaooooo. What a pathetic loser Mussab
@@awehornet calm down man.
@@awehornet Deobandis are the worst.
Three high schoolers making videos about each other. They all start the same. You mocked them just as much as they did you. What a waste of time.
your weak response exposing you more.
This is too funny. What next is he gonna say about our Prophet.
The hadeeth mentioned
Allah comes to His faithful worshipers on the Day of Resurrection and appears to them in an image other than the image which they saw Him in previously as a test for them. He will say (to them), “I am your Lord.” They will say, “We take refuge with Allah from you. We will stay here till our Lord comes to us.” And when our Lord comes, we will recognize Him. Subsequently, Allah will come to them in His own image, recognizable to them, and say, “I am your Lord.” They will say, “You are our Lord…”
why do you mention Usman Faruk? to show you are better? why can't you address them without mentioning him
Both are students of knowledge and have the same Aqeedah, so they can advise each other, you should know that.
Salafis attacking Salafis they are a house divided
Assalamualaikum...i believe it’s better to not give them any attention.
th-cam.com/video/9n3g7jtRPRs/w-d-xo.html
This video is the halwa for shabe barat.
I'm seeing your videos for the first time and thought you were handsome 🤣🤣, then when I heard these people mocking your head, it was hilarious. I dare them to measure the circumference of their head and then compare it with yours, if any of theirs is bigger than your head, they better delete their TH-cam channel or accept they took an L
@Hmz Zrg exactly, these guys both state we will take the higher road, then both of them start attacking each other and mocking
And I consider both of these groups of people traditionalists. Abu musab outright made tabdi on them with no authority to do that. Rabi madkhali doesn't even call saved qutb an innovator!
The Salafis in sub-continent like the Muhadith of Pakistan Sheikh Zubair Ali Zai has vehemently refuted these deobandis and there devaint Aqeedah. As for calling them from the Ashab ul-Hadith than that speech is Batil, they are from the Ahul-Kalam, and they are Maturids, so there deviance is known, one of there belief is Allah is one but not in number. Contemplate on these statements.
Imam of the Jahmi Maturidiyyah Taftazani states:
“We know that the first obligation is to know, and recognize Allah. Are we supposed to know Allah through ilm-ul-kalam? If that were the case, then we would say, ‘He does not have a form nor anyone resembling Him nor body nor shape nor meat nor blood nor personality nor appearance nor mass nor colour nor taste nor smell nor feel nor experience of heat or cold or dryness nor wetness nor length nor width nor depth nor togetherness nor separateness nor movement nor stationariness nor can He be divided and he cannot be put into different parts and limbs and he does not face a direction and he does not have a right side or left or front or back or above or below and he is not part of this world and he is not outside of this world”.
Contrasted with the Hindu in regards to their believe in Allah.
The Upanishad states, “It is not coarse, not fine, nor short, nor long, not glowing, not adhesive, without shadow and without darkness, without air and without space, without stickiness, odourless, tasteless, without eye, without voice, without mouth, without measure, without inside and without outside”.
Imam Ibn Mandah said: Interpretation (ta͛wil) is viewed by Ahul-hadith as a form of denial. Al-Radd ͚ala Al-Jahmiyyah
Sheikh Zubari Ali Zai the Muhadith of Pakistan said, that our fight is with the Hanafis who are Deobandis, and Brewails, who in reality are the deniers of the Sunnah (due to extremism), those Hanafis who are not extreme in Fiqh, and who gives precedence to Sunnah, by applying the statement of Imam Nauman that if a Sahih Hadith reach me that is my Madhab, if my statement contradict the Sunnah throw it at the wall, they are the flowers of our head.
Some of the deviance of those of you ascribe to the Ashab ul-Hadith.
Aqeedah errors of the Deobandis
1- They believe Allah is everywhere in everything
2- They believe in seeking blessings from graves
3- They deny attributes of Allah except for few
4- They separate actions from Iman
5- They believe prophet is alive so you can ask him to intercede and make dua which is Shirk
6- They don't know meaning of Lā Ilāha Ill-Allāh they translate it as no lord but Allah
7- They are fanatic hanafis , don't care about hadith
8- They believe in seeking tabarruk from "Saints"
9- They deny ahad hadith when it comes to Aqeedah
And many more
17:28 when did they say they are experts at English
33:21 inna wa akhawatiha . Jahl
13:50 "Elsewhere"
Bro stop 😭
Nahh 21:48 to 22:06 killed me 😂
لا ايها الثلج لا تبردني اكثر 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Wallahi I don’t understand 💀 These mawlanas only focus on details but never will they be real men and show us from the Quran, the sunna and the books of the salaf that our aqeeda is corrupted. I prefer being the worst in arabic and at least have the aqeeda of the salaf than being the best in arabic and rejecting Allah’s attributes, worshipping the grave of mawlana ulabitou salaloulou… 🤦🏿♂️
Books of the Salaf such as As-Sunnah of Imam Abdullah or As-Sunnah of Imam ibn Harb ibn Ismail Al-Karmani or Books of Uthman Abi Sa'id Ad-Darami, etc is kryptonite to these Maturids who believe Allah is one but not in number.
Also, beautifully said, that is correct.
If your pronunciation Tajweed is corrupted with grave mistakes whilst teaching someone higher level sciences then you are lost. Pronunciation and error in certain words is a big sin. This is Allah’s book not ABC blue clues.
The ilm and Haq is with the people who preserve the Qur’aan especially.
Likewise you learn from old institutions because they uphold the integrity.
Like you study for a degree you go to a proven place in institution and integrity. Not at home DIY self study ABC TH-cam.
How do you think Islam Qur’aan is preserved from Teacher to Student. Continuous chain sanad
@@bouncer786 what you say is pure haqq no doubt about that but firstly here the brother didn’t make as grave mistakes as these mawlanas make it seem (I’m not justifying quoting badly the book of Allāh) so the brother alhamdoulilah, as far I know, isn’t concerned by what you sayin. But how on the earth a good recitation will benefit them if their aqīda is corrupted like what the hell goin on 💀 The very book they’re refuting others for « misquoting » it, they themselves, even though they’ve s good recitation of it, don’t even follow it in terms of understanding of tawhīd and creed. I mean how can someone care about digging deep in videos of salafi du’at and trying to find their mistakes while the basics of aqīda and tawhīd you don’t even respect them 💀
We should both have sound creed and master the recitation of the book of Allāh
Don’t they think that they’ve someting more urgent to fix on themselves first especially in terms of aqīda… ya akhi how can someone use ‘ilmoul kalām and aristotle philosophical principles in the book of Allāh, ending up by rejecting his attributes and now when the muslims with the sound belief that goes straight back to the sahābas refute him and his bātil he turns nasty and he filthily fetch for any mistake to dismiss them. Are we on Jupiter or whut 💀. And again, to make it clear, i’m not justifying the mistakes in Quran recitation rather i promote the fact that we should lower them and always make sure not to play with the speech of Allāh. And whosoever plays with the book of Allāh then we should not listen to him but there are some errors that are understandable because of the context and so on.
Ustadh, looks like your samsung ear buds are uncomfortable, you keep touching them?
😂😂