Yanis Varoufakis Meets David Wengrow | A New History of Humanity
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025
- What if everything we thought we knew about the origins of human civilisation is a myth?
The collaborator of the late, legendary anthropologist David Graeber joins Yanis Varoufakis to overturn everything you think you know about the history of human civilisation.
We all know how the story of humankind begins. Our remote ancestors were primitive and childlike, living in egalitarian hunter-gatherer bands. Then came farming and property, priests and kings, wealth and its unavoidable consequence: inequality.
Drawing on cutting edge archaeological evidence, the late David Graeber and his collaborator David Wengrow have told an ambitious and revelatory new history of the world - one that overturns the notion of Rosseau’s innocent Noble Savage and the ‘nasty, brutish and short’ lives of Thomas Hobbes alike.
Now, in conversation with former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis, David Wengrow will take us from egalitarian early cities in Mexico and Mesopotamia to part-time kings and queens in Ice Age Europe, and challenge our assumptions about the origins of cities, democracy, slavery, and civilisation itself.
This livestream event will transform your understanding of our past and offer a powerful, playful, and extraordinarily original vision of our future.
Yanis Varoufakis is the author of the bestselling Talking to My Daughter: A Brief History of Capitalism and two previous books. Born in Athens in 1961, Yanis Varoufakis was for many years a professor of economics in Britain, Australia and the USA before he entered politics. He is co-founder of the international grassroots movement, DiEM25, and in 2019 won election as one of its representatives in the Greek Parliament. He is currently Professor of Economics at the University of Athens.
David Wengrow is a professor of comparative archaeology at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, and has been a visiting professor at New York University. He is the author of three books, including What Makes Civilization? Wengrow conducts archaeological fieldwork in various parts of Africa and the Middle East.
(Recorded in January 2022)
Having been a fan of Graeber's work for years (so too Varoufakis'- learned a great deal from 'Talking to my Daughter') I asked for and received 'The Dawn of Everything' as a Christmas gift and had read it, cover-to-cover, by the New Year. Absolutely fantastic piece of work - which now informs my own writing as a wannabe author of historical fiction for young people- and while I'm devastated I won't be able to read much else that involves Graeber (except the posthumously published Pirate Enlightenment, which is already on my reading list) I'm grateful that through him I was introduced to David Wengrow's work, which I intend to read just as exhaustively. Thank you both for all that you do, and for this brilliant interview.
Have you read some of Graeber's more academic work? I studied Anthropology but I still reckon it's very readable to a wider public, 'Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value' is his magnum opus imo.
@@valq10 th-cam.com/video/UR-EN0YIBIg/w-d-xo.html
Fantastic interview or conversation
on the supposed opposition between materialism and choice, I believe Brazilian philosopher Vladimir Safatle provides a good summary: Freedom is not "choice", but understanding your place in time and history and your conditions. so providing research as Graeber and Wengrow did is literally a way to increase our freedom, not by allowing us to magically ignore our material conditions but to see them without so much filtering by temporal, eurocentric narratives.
Eurocentrism is a huge problem, as is mono-USAism. Both are problems of ignorance, quite simply. We ignore the influence of a) collectives of people outside Europe and/or b) collectives of people who live in NorthAmerica who are not WASPs ie: White Anglo-Saxon Protestants.
Let's remember that Eurocentric viewpoints are forced on us as much by the Left as the Right. Example: The Arabian Nights, for all its faults, encouraged respectful curiosity about the cultures of North Africa and Southwestern Asia. Now, any interest in the Arabian Nights gets you labeled racist! In fact any curiosity about non-Western cultures that isn't rigidly submitted to bitter snobs is labeled racist. This is the Left's fault. If you demand only perfect representation, you forbid all representation. In America, in the 1940s and 1950s, there was a whole genre of films with Arab heroes. Any attempt to do anything like one of these adventure films today would be violently attacked. The Left, by banishing Sinbad and Shaharazade, promotes ignorance of Arab culture.
Making a politically correct fantasy of non-Western prehistory will simply shame people out of learning about the past as the Left shames people out of learning about other cultures. By doing this, you take away great sources of empathy. You create a helpless apolitical mob that is easy prey to the Right wing.
This view provides a basis for reviewing and rethinking our traditional understanding of human history and development.
Sshhhh..... Men are talking. Go play with your hair and unconsenting children
excellently put!
A very inspiring conversation, thank you. I think, The Dawn of Everything is a revolutionary book that may change the worldviews of many readers.
Yannis and David
Nothing more to add but thank you thank you thank you.
From Mexico where for fifty years I have been exposed first hand some of the great civilizing influences of indigenous cultures from Huicholes in the north to Tsotsiles in Chiapas and many more.
Communities in which until contaminated from outside theft is virtually non existent, the stranger is welcomed and whatever meager fare is generously (and embarrassingly) shared.
the land time forgot the northan hemisphear is ware the brain expanded it became more smarter think of the world today what you see is all because the human being movin north became smarter due to brain formation
Chiapas! Where the Zapatistas exist!
I have jusy purchased this book. I really look forward to reading this. Thank you for sharing this video. Great discussion and very informative. David is much missed. He was such a great and good man. ❤ Solidarity.
Prehistory IS sexy and fascinating. Where we came from is inherently interesting, allowing us to understand where we might go. Which prehistoric points we select and draw through which aspect of the present gives us a choice of futures to move toward.
This makes me happy and makes me feel connected to history and possibility. It makes me feel human. It also makes me feel joyful that such minds inhabit this planet, now, in space and time. Thank you David for your work and Energy, so bravely and well continuing with David Graeber in your heart and soul. Please accept our acknowledgment of that. And all the threads that weave your world And ours. Both you and Yanus , Together, bring so much thought and clarity to the myriad strands of humanity and history that have brought us to this point in history, always on going, hopefully. A truly fascinating discussion/event every thinking person should witness. My sincerest gratitude. I shall share widely to my closest friends. Happy holidays from a little corner of New England. 🙏❤️
I by no means consider myself an intellectual as I’m not disciplined and well read enough to have engaged in serious intellectual inquiry. But, now and again I become interested in a new book and author proposing a new way of looking at the big picture of humanity’s history and pre-history. I’m also drawn to academic authors who have the courage to stick their neck out in this way because it’s clear they’ll be ridiculed and even vilified by guardians of the western canon’s received wisdom (as well as by academic specialists who fear their corner of expertise has been ignored or misconstrued). A long time ago I studied anthropology at the graduate level and have maintained my interest in the subject over the years, in fits and starts, so that’s another reason for picking up the book. I too am excited by the ideas in it. It breathes life into our pre-historic ancestors in such a profound way that it makes me feel truly connected to those far distant forbears. FWIW, I recommend this book highly.
thank you for a thoughtful discussion, I have just bought The Dawn of Everything. I have often struggled with the concept that a species can be hundreds of thousands of years old but "civilization" is only ten thousand years old. Sea travel, navigation, astronomy, acrhitecture, warfare, animal husbandry etc appear clearly to have developed over a much longer timeline. I would gladly attend public lectures and discussions on this, it is a great shame David Graeber is no longer with us and I hope David Wengrow continues his research and writing.
I was excited by the title. Two great minds meeting.
Really interesting conversation. Marvellous book deserves to be discussed in this manner.
I’ve read DOE twice now & think I’ll probably go back for a 3rd. Truly epic work & an incredibly fun read to boot.
Brilliant conversation here. Thank you
I recently bought both presenters’ books. I cannot wait to read it. Thank you for the truth and different perspective that challenges the existent views of today.
David, surely you and your co-author have made great job! I am from Ukraine and at least I see great efforts to overcome stupid totalitarian dogmas of human evolution. I have an understandable problem to buy your book, but great thanks for your lectures and youtube presentations.
What an insightful and revealing exchange. I thank both of these gentlemen for their dedication to this frank discourse.
How exciting to hear this!! How did I miss one? I am always amazed by intelligence and I love all of you. Books 📚 Did not Carl Jung meet the indigenous American Indians and what was his assumptions?
I loved David Graeber, anthropologist and David Wengrow's work and now with Yanis Varoufakis expertise.
This was brilliance.
With the deepest appreciation and admiration respect for contributions to humanity.
RIP, David.❤️✨️
this is absolutely fantastic! thank you so much for uploading this!
So refreshing - thank you both and the late, great David Graeber.
Yanis, your reasoning is as clear and logical as that of your father. 👍👏
The discovery of iron changed the lives of people all around the world as well as their environment in prehistoric times.
This was a truly enjoyable conversation! Thank you!
I wondered what a conversation between these two would sound like as I was reading the book, haha. Great conversation, could listen to them chat for days. Thank you!
what a truly lovely interview.thankyou. ❤
What a combination! Well done getting these two oustanding people together.
Indigenous thought given respect is most welcome!
What a shame the referendum in Australia to have the Indigenous
Voice To Parliament
did not win.
It would be a gift to us all to hear their perspective.
Loved this interview, thanks.
Brilliant duo for a talk
Thanks for this. Been slowly reading the Dawn of Everything. So mind expanding and yes, funny!
It is such an interesting topic with a refleshing view, thank you!
David Graebers "The Dawn of Everything" is really good!
As an Anthropological and Anarchist work!
Im glad you bring up Anti Teleology, and the status of Violence of past to Violence now, really reminds me of the concepts of Divine vs Mythic Violence!
Just started - A New History of Humanity. Its really good, i need to finish it to get my final view on it! The philosophical inputs of local's tribes on enlightenment is interesting! Enlightenment being core to liberal ideas, i am challenged to say the least!
Thanks for having these guys on!
Please take down Harari's photo from your Wall of Fame.
I love it that Yanis uses the webcam beautification filters on max
Really brilliant conversation. Thanks 😊
So powerfull exchange discussion between two minds!!
wicked discussion chaps. nice one.
I think it was in his "Candide" (c. 1757) that Voltaire introduced a "Red Indian" as a wise and searching character in contrast with the foolish know-it-all Dr. Pangloss. (Green Fire, UK) 🌈🦉
Brilliant! as always.
Greeks- The Light of the World.
Thanks to you Both.
What a great exchange
OMG, this is gold.
Edit: already heard it on the podcast a year ago. :( Never mind, worth a revisit.
Wow, what a collaboration
I love that not only did you guys write this work David and David, but you have networked with Yanis Varoufakis who is one of the few economists who does not deliberately obfuscate economic discussion to pretend to greater meaning and efficacy of financial ideas.
A debate between two great minds, fabulous
Great interview!
Love the versatile views on civilizations
Dewey's Art as Experience might be worth reading in regard to this. Thank you for this superb exchange.
I've read more than half, very slowly and carefully. Encouraging to reason logic and our sense of truth.
What an amazing disscusion. Thx u
Im only 50 pages into The Dawn of Everything and it's just fantastic, 100% recommend!
Graeber was one of the great social thinkers of history. Up there with Karl Marx. His finding that everything was bullshit, especially jobs (griftonomics) , is timeless and incipiently revolutionary.
Just bought the book and looking forward to reading it. I notice that Darlington's book -The Evolution of man and society' is not quoted yet might actually have some relevance to the arguments. (also a big fan of Technofeudalism!)
Economic investigator Frank G Melbourne Australia is following this very informative content cheers Frank 😊
Fascinating, thanks.
I think that the academic and intellectual commitment to this idea of "inevitable developmentalism" from the socalled primitive to the supposedly advanced civilization is based in large part on 19th century (and earlier) racism.- as indeed is the whole idea of social evolution. It is predicated on the idea that white Europeans are some pinnacle of development contrasted to the "primitive" social organizations of the "others" often darker skinned people. (One wonders about physical evolution as well. Not that it did not happen, but that it also wasn't, as Yanis says, an "inexorable vector" of progress. But that is another question.) Bottom line is that Wengrow and Graeber have opened up a hopeful view of the possibilities of human social capability.
it is easy to observe different societies and complexity, variation in nature. it is through human exceptionalism that we maintain this distructive miths...
thank you❤
I was hoping the discussion would’ve delved more into the authors’ notion of certain human groups at certain times and places becoming “stuck” in a particular social organization and how and why it happens.
Great talk. One thing, the Louisiana site David dates 3000 bc as hunter gatherer society. Historians however date the agricultural revolution circa 10000 bc.
There is a great tradition of people envisioning the past as a representation of the world as they would like it to be. I would approach this book with care.
Just make sure you approach all books regarding the past the same way, because this book stands in contrast to a standard narrative built by many books.
These two are 21st century legends. 37:00 is the greatest potential for debate. Luxembourg’s response to Marx is relevant here, but Varoufakis doesn’t push it, he almost shoots himself and his whole argument in the foot.
There is a real potential for these two to work out what is the “libertarian communist” “technofeudal” humanist rationalist opportunity… I’m still waiting for it.
Excellent!
What was the primary influence of the enlightenment thinkers? 1. The Catholic Church? 2. The Reformation 3. Renewal in Classical Scholarship 4. The Indigenous critique on Western Civilization? The four stages of cultural awareness.
good work
Who gives the most money dominates the dialogue the museum must adhere to , Rockefeller, and the Met in NYC for example.
The only "material given" is that we all have to eat. How we decide to do that; what we decide to eat; the social structures we create in order to eat, those are not "given."
We also need some health care otherwise we could die from injuries etc.
It is not possible to make a clear distinction between civilization and barbarism, as organized violence and its catastrophic consequences have negatively affected all peoples from time immemorial to the present. What we call civilization is an immense pile of rubble and corpses lying on top of other pile of rubble and corpses. Even the pacifism of some people is capable of awakening insane and violent reactions. There is no revolutionary hope based on the principle of justice that does not eventually result in industrial-scale organized murder and nasty dictatorship. Humanity has dragged itself from one illusion to another, clinging to the hope of an impossible restart for over 3,000 years. If we're lucky (I say lucky, because we don't have any sense or sanity) humanity won't be wiped out by nuclear war. And at the exact moment I see this video, the apes are in their tanks killing each other in the heart of Europe and others striving so that the killing is not interrupted.
I keep faith, there is good in humanity, I see it every day
@@bigbenji6 I understand. But let me tell you an alchemical secret: faith is just the harbinger of despair. Man needs to go beyond both to realize the priceless value of indifference. Only when he becomes indifferent to his own feelings, thoughts and beliefs does man begin to see the world clearly as it really is.
@Fabio de Oliveira Ribeiro
I kept the faith and I kept voting
Not for the iron fist but for the helping hand
For theirs is a land with a wall around it
And mine is a faith in my fellow man
Theirs is a land of hope and glory
Mine is the green field and the factory floor
Theirs are the skies all dark with bombers
And mine is the peace we knew
Between the wars
@@fabiodeoliveiraribeiro1602you sound like Vincent in the movie Collateral, although I’m not accusing you of being a hired ikiller
Rest in Power, David :((
Splendid
Mersi pt jartiere că eu îs taranca și n am!
"Struggle" and "survival of the fittest" are not "true theories" as Yanis says. Darwin (god love him, and we do) did not do most of his own field work because of his health and commitment to being home with his children. He relied on the reports of people who had huge agendas-colonial administrators, clerics and so forth. When Kropotkin (a Russian anarchist with a totally different agenda than the inherently racist one of 19th century Europe) looked at the same data as Darwin, he saw, not struggle as the basis of lifeway organization, but cooperation. Pre-existing ideas of how human life exists informed both men. The whole idea of a fight to the finish needs to be reexamined.
ooh. Dream team!
It is necessary to correct the introductory text. David Graeber is very much alive as can be seen. It doesn't make this dialogue less interesting.
I do like Wengrow and Graeber, but I do feel like they misunderstand the point about dialectical materialism. It is not deterministic, it believes that BOTH the material world and the world of ideas are incredibly important in shaping society. Dialectics comes from the latin word dialogue, referring to a process where the material world and the ideational world are speaking back and fourth with each other in a dialectical process, which shapes society forward. What dialectical materialism holds is that there is a primacy on the material world. This is a rather basic insight. As Yanis' Marx quote alluded to, "Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please". If I have the idea today of going to the gym, but there is no gym in my city, it is gonna be difficult for me to go to the gym. Similarly, if there is a tyrant with the idea of building a hierarchical society in which he/she is on top of the ladder, he/she will only be able to do so if they got some material means that they can use as leverage to help them achieve that vision, ie. money, debt or military. The idea that various hierarchical societies just emerged through people "experimenting" with different societal structures is not true. Try telling the the slaves and the colonized people throughout history that their society was "voluntary experimenting". That notion is fundamentally untrue.
The TH-cam channel "what is politics", has a good critique on the Dawn of Everything for anyone interesting in this critique . Can recommend. th-cam.com/video/oJIHWk_M398/w-d-xo.html
Power differentials occur when 'niches' open up. The 'expansive' urge, the will to power, is always present and looking for opportunities, but traditional prohibitions (scaling traps) keep it constrained. When a niche opens up, it takes advantage.
I'm not sure if this correlates to Brien Foerster's work of megalithic study and theory of a major cataclysm 12,000 years ago?
Let me grab a snack, I know I'm in good company :)
At the end of reading the book I played "it ain't necessarily so"
Yesterday Varoufakis was assaulted by bullies in public. They broke his nose. He was at a restaurant in the centre of Athens. Along with DM25 members. He chose not to be escorted by his personal security and the result was a cruel attack to his face and Democracy...
Hope Everything is Ok with Him...
@@mariettestabel275 Thank you for your concern! Yes he is totally fine! He may not need a nose surgery eventually. All parliament parties condemned this attack. From the right to the left. A 17-year-old was arrested today. A criminal charge was laid. The police is after many more individuals. We 'll see.
The irony is he wasn't assualted by Varoufakis fantasy claim of "hired thugs" (i.e. implying government political opponenents or rightwing extremists). He was assaulted by anarchist thugs. After years of Varoufakis shamelessly defending anarchist terrorism against police, the government, the private sector, and the public... It will be comical to see how Varoufakis tries to back peddles his latest conspiracy theory.
@@mydogsbutler We dont know yet who assaulted him for sure. I wouldn't believe government's narration about "anarchist thugs". I think this is possible too. But let's stick to facts for the time present.
If this is the case, as you claim, then ideed this is an irony....tragic irony.....
@@dimkk605 No. police caught them. Just random punks. Not “hired thugs” like far leftist conspiracy theory peddling varoufakis claimed. Sick of this varoufakis shamelessly defending countless acts of violence by anarchist goons.
About the indigenous perspective on europeans, its imposible no to read the "Coronica y buen gobierno" of Guaman Poma Ayala
What "determines" the effects that any given human "invention" (such as capitalism or metallurgy) will have, is not the invention itself, but any hierarchical structure within which it gets used. As capitalism is itself hierarchical and expansionist/imperialist by nature (which metallurgy is not) it has had a radical transformative effect which was "inevitable" by its nature. The question is more what would the socalled industrial revolution have been had it not been within a capitalist framework. And no, capitalism and the building of very clever machines are not the same thing.
Graham Hancock gave similar respect for prehistoric Earth work builders (see Netflix Ancient Apocalypse) and people attack him because they interpret that as detracting from later cultural development.
I'd like to hear a response to the observation that all human cultures and societies since the emergence of homo sapiens, or perhaps the emergence of the genus homo, have had to cope with at least two biological hangovers embedded in the genome, each in its own way. I see these as being: a) the persistence due to longer lifespans of superfluous amounts of testosterone in males beyond that which is necessary for the reproduction required for the perpetuation of the species, and b) the presence within a small percentage of the species of a genetic predisposition for the psychopathy-narcissism-sadism personality driven with the urge to dominate and engage in other well-known behaviours that many of us see as destructive, and that every surviving society has apparently worked out their own individual ways of coping with these behavioural predispositions.
Why did a type of industrial revolution not happen earlier
I love how they put f****** Emma Watson up there like "look at the great mind we've talked to" haha.
Danke Y, Varoufakis
Great
Isn't the Genesis story a cultural memory of the mith of the simple life In pre agriculture societies?
that's a funny proposition if you try to make other peoples' origin myths fit in. where does the giant turtle come in?
@@voltcorp The earth's horizon, looking at a distance from atop the turtle. Quite smart hypothesis if you look at turtles all day :)
You are discussing so many things, history, philosophy, political systems. Have a look at this: it is important with respect to social housing in Chinas recent past. China‘s BIGGEST traditional communal home for more than 600 people - Fujian Hakka Tulou | EP8, S2
Mr. Faroufakis, I'm sorry about the loss of your father.
This is hardly relevant, but is because he does it so often: what is David looking at top right? Is he speaking to the mike but looking up at a screen top right? I've read the book: massive supply of food for thought.
Love this, give me more Google
How can Earth go forward without knowing its past this is Lifetime awareness Earth Finance future
❤👍
54:48
invisible force field 😶🌫
37:52
Didn't David Graeber learn all his bad ideas about non-leadership from Gene Sharp, who was an operative for the intelligence community?
why do you invite a guest when it is you who talks most of the time???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
A lot of my history lessons were just pep talks, UK.
Its super depressing being me
You too?
Aww, the man who sold the world... I mean Greece 😂
InstaLike
The dawn of everything is beautiful fiction book written by a good-hearted propagandist
I think hierarchy comes from when bird mites came and took feathers off of the dinosaurs. Hierarchical structure is arachnid in nature from the smallest scale
Interesting idea❤
This is a lot of elaborate theorizing to justify parasitism. The woods are not far off. You can just go enjoy your commune if you don't want to engage in trade with the productive giants who build your infrastructure, make your iPhones & laptops, and ask a pittance for them in relation to the immense labor and invention inputs that produced them. We live in a generation of parasites, unwilling to look at their own meager contributions to the material wealth around them, who then see fit to complain that not enough of the wealth producers accumulate is being shared back to them. On what basis? On what basis do non-producers believe they are owed the wealth that would make the Gini Coefficient bend to their liking?