OLD RADIAL vs ROTARY Engines Cold Starting up and Great Sound

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
  • This video features OLD RADIAL vs ROTARY Engines Cold Starting up and Great Sound. If you wanna see some crazy airplane engines start up and sound watch this video and if you like the video hit the like button and SUBSCRIBE.
    SUBSCRIBE NOW:
    / @carsandengines
    SWEET T-SHIRTS:
    cars-engines.c...
    Disclaimer
    This video is fair use under U.S. copyright law because it is transformative in nature, uses no more of the original than necessary and has no negative effect on the market for the original work.

ความคิดเห็น • 39

  • @bigbelconut
    @bigbelconut ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I love the sound of a Rolls-Royce Merlin, but nothing compares to a big radial.
    Hearing a P-47 or a F4U and B'17 on take off sends chills up my spine.

    • @clearcreek69
      @clearcreek69 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gotta love Pratt & Whitney

  • @Lykapodium
    @Lykapodium ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Gotta love the rolling shutter effect

  • @tonyelliott7734
    @tonyelliott7734 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Rotary engines are an engineering wonder...

  • @heraklit8.170
    @heraklit8.170 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Btw., the Oberursel Engine Company (Motorenfabrik Oberursel) is still in business, after Deutz and BMW, they are part of Rolls Royce since 2000.

  • @shortribslongbow5312
    @shortribslongbow5312 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Love those round engines. :o)

    • @Pwills
      @Pwills ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean radial engines
      Or rotary engines

    • @bugz000
      @bugz000 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Pwills no, round.

  • @eliasaxelson1411
    @eliasaxelson1411 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This rotary engine is a crazy engine, I don't understand why it was made?

    • @wallnut886
      @wallnut886 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Back in the first world war they didn't know how to properly air cool radial engines, so they just made the whole thing spin to keep it cool

  • @Workerbee-zy5nx
    @Workerbee-zy5nx ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome engines. The semi with the rad on back should fire that engine in traffic, it might keep tailgaters away😂😂😂

  • @scottmichael3745
    @scottmichael3745 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just fabulous! Loved it.

  • @BarefootBill
    @BarefootBill ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing difference between the WWI and WWII engines!

  • @johnzangari3432
    @johnzangari3432 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think the rotary engine would be the engines with the rotating cylinders.

  • @Allan_aka_RocKITEman
    @Allan_aka_RocKITEman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video...👍

  • @hotrodray6802
    @hotrodray6802 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nothing like TWO 2800s at full throttle on takeoff 👍👍👍😎😎🇺🇸🇺🇸 A26b

  • @UtahDelaCruz
    @UtahDelaCruz ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you're firing up an air-cooled engine without a prop, how long does it take to overheat?

    • @egustafson
      @egustafson 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm gonna say pretty darn fast buccaroo

  • @arahanterakhir7714
    @arahanterakhir7714 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All the good engine will be the propeller blade turning counter clockwise otherwise the engine consider not good enough

  • @paullubliner6221
    @paullubliner6221 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    At 0:43 THAT is a LeRhone 9C, (80 hp at 1200 rpm: Nieupot 11, Sopwitch Pup, Dh2 etc.) It is NOT a Gnome Monosoupap. Can't you spend 15 seconds looking this crap up?

  • @diegomr6969
    @diegomr6969 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ROTARY ENGINE TOO DANGEROUS FOR ME

  • @daviddishon642
    @daviddishon642 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rotary engines hadn’t been designed in ww1

    • @waynepurcell6058
      @waynepurcell6058 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Rotary engines were designed in the 1890's. You're probably thinking of the WANKEL engine which came out much later and "technically" isn't a "rotary engine" at all. Rotary ENGINE means a rotating ENGINE. A Wankel doesn't rotate, it has a rotor inside of it that rotates.

    • @TinkerToby
      @TinkerToby 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Shows what you know 🙄

  • @musicbruv
    @musicbruv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    rolling shutter effect ruins the video.

  • @brentdykgraaf184
    @brentdykgraaf184 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ahhhhhh there it is....radial fix for the day ! Thank you !

  • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
    @skaldlouiscyphre2453 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I won't be happy until I find a Fokker with a 13B swap. _BRAPBRAPBRAP_

    • @xyxxyx4883
      @xyxxyx4883 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      R26B would br much better

  • @knobsdialsandbuttons
    @knobsdialsandbuttons 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What speed does the rotary engine spin ?. You'd think the centrifugal forces would tear it apart, even quicker than the wooden propeller ! 😮

  • @westcoast3595
    @westcoast3595 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Radial was an engendering marvel.

  • @Michael-um5pd
    @Michael-um5pd 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just love the sound of them all

  • @mikepxg6406
    @mikepxg6406 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All compromised. Never going to beat a Merlin Engine.

  • @davekreitzer4358
    @davekreitzer4358 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    To much energy spent and not enough flying !!! 🧐🥴

  • @daviddishon642
    @daviddishon642 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn’t see a single rotary engine in the bunch

    • @UtahDelaCruz
      @UtahDelaCruz ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You're talking about a Wankel rotary engine - like in the Mazda RX7. The term "rotary engine" pre-dates the Wankel and was applied to any engine where the cylinders were distributed evenly around the crankshaft. Engines with stationary cylinders came to be known as "radial engines".

    • @stupitdog9686
      @stupitdog9686 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@UtahDelaCruz.... Oooh ..... I wuz wondering about that too!! So the early "rotarys" were the ones where the cylinders rotated with the propellor !? That musta given major gyroscopic control problems given all that mass rotating at the front of the plane !!!

    • @UtahDelaCruz
      @UtahDelaCruz ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stupitdog9686 I wondered about that. My guess is that this was taking place so early in the development of aircraft that if the engine was properly balanced, anything else would just be perceived as wind buffeting - rather than gyroscopic effects. Hard to say - not many of those types of aircraft around anymore.

    • @stupitdog9686
      @stupitdog9686 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UtahDelaCruz ...Yes I suppose so....gyroscopic effects where probably unthought of at this time ... hard enough to understand now !!