Chronic Kidney Disease (updated 2023) - CRASH! Medical Review Series

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @waelfadlallah8939
    @waelfadlallah8939 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Who needs Netflix when there are videos like this!

  • @dutchcuts1046
    @dutchcuts1046 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In the diagram there is arrow from increased PTH to increased phosphate absorption, but doesnt pth lower phosphate absorption?

  • @christinafeseha3001
    @christinafeseha3001 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Tnk u sir

  • @waelfadlallah8939
    @waelfadlallah8939 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @7:55 you said in case of met acidosis we can give bicarb yet @14:53 it's mentioned to give calcium carbonate, so which one exactly is used for management or just either of which are just fine ?

    • @pwbmd
      @pwbmd  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ACUTE metabolic acidosis in the context of CKD and hemodialysis patients is associated with HYPOcalcemia (increased calcium excretion). So calcium carbonate may be a good option there. But CHRONIC metabolic acidosis can be associated with HYPERcalcemia (increased PTH). In the absence of hypocalcemia (e.g., a patient with metabolic acidosis but no CKD or hypocalcemia, which is most), sodium bicarbonate is better to prevent metastatic calcification. But we generally try to avoid giving base in metabolic acidosis unless it's severe. There are conflicting recommendations, but usually not unless the pH is less than 7.1. On exams, do not expect to be asked to pick one over the other, because there are conflicting recommendations on when to give which one. And in practice this should only be done in consultation with a nephrologist. Personally, I'd be reticent to treat severe metabolic acidosis in a CKD patient all on my own. Too many potential complications. For exam purposes, definitely pick sodium bicarb if base therapy is needed and there is no hypocalcemia.
      Here's some reading that compares different methods: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991191/
      Remember, as my disclaimer says, my videos are for exam review purposes. They should NOT be used to replace the professional judgment of a specialist -- in this case, a nephrologist.

    • @waelfadlallah8939
      @waelfadlallah8939 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pwbmd can't thank you enough for this enriched reply, i got what i want. Appreciated!

    • @RamNath-jo3sz
      @RamNath-jo3sz ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@pwbmdQ

  • @rebbekandahuma2173
    @rebbekandahuma2173 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sweet!