The Greenhouse Effect & Global Warming

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 137

  • @shaikhzoya2002
    @shaikhzoya2002 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    You uploaded after a long time. Thanks. Keep uploading.

    • @BeverlyBiology
      @BeverlyBiology  8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah.... I don't get a lot of time to upload during the school year. Now that I'm on summer vacation, I have some extra time.

    • @shaikhzoya2002
      @shaikhzoya2002 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Happy holidays!!!!!

  • @warilaetamaraye8712
    @warilaetamaraye8712 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'll listen again.
    Really easy to follow

  • @laurapduran
    @laurapduran 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Complete information. Interesting. Thank you. Greetings

    • @BeverlyBiology
      @BeverlyBiology  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Greeting to you as well.. thanks for watching

  • @AsepOk
    @AsepOk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    every one must try to save the earth from pollution save our future generation

  • @Godzillatronus2021
    @Godzillatronus2021 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love this video! This was super important for my bio test, is very clear and descriptive, and you've got such a soothing voice during the whole video! Thank you so much!

    • @driven9863
      @driven9863 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Global Warming is a Hoax

    • @elinikolai7493
      @elinikolai7493 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@driven9863 Explain why?

    • @driven9863
      @driven9863 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@elinikolai7493 Professor Peter Ridd is one example.

    • @bartonpaullevenson3427
      @bartonpaullevenson3427 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@driven9863 If you have proof it's a hoax, produce it. If you have no proof, STFU.

    • @driven9863
      @driven9863 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bartonpaullevenson3427 Professor Peter Ridd of Australia, is your proof.

  • @Masonator
    @Masonator 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Helped me a lot. Thank you was much needed

  • @AsepOk
    @AsepOk 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot for these precious lectures for us. God bless you and your team.

    • @niko-laus
      @niko-laus 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      a---- more religioes dumbing snap out of this nonsense
      since 1859 from charles darwin we not ignorance people know how live evolve
      how many talents are wasted on this nonsense called religion is a sad story we do need all an board to solve present and future problems

    • @chocolaterain8137
      @chocolaterain8137 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@niko-lausSeems like you need to snap out of bad grammar.

    • @niko-laus
      @niko-laus ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chocolaterain8137 that's the best speech to text for my accent how many language u r speaking ?

  • @hidethepain5026
    @hidethepain5026 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanx dude you help me a lot....... ive earn some useful knowledge about it👍👍

    • @BeverlyBiology
      @BeverlyBiology  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My pleasure... thanks for watching

  • @samlair3342
    @samlair3342 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    “If it were not for greenhouse gases, Infrared Radiation (heat) would freely escape thru the atmosphere and into space resulting in a planet frozen solid.”
    Note: Use the above statement as the search topic in your browser and very appropriate and pertinent links will result.

  • @samlair3342
    @samlair3342 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The good news about global warming is that it’s not being caused by increasing solar output or any other natural uncontrollable cause - and also that mankind generally understands that it’s the ‘amplified greenhouse effect’ which is responsible for global temperature increases. With this in mind, it behooves us to rapidly advance and apply our scientific and technological knowledge to the point that the burning of fossil fuels to produce electricity will become as antiquated as the burning of whale oil for light.
    Quote: “Anxiety must go. It must be replaced by faith and solemn confidence in the outworking of the divine plan.”
    Note: As sunlight (photons) is warming the surface of the world, surface heat energy is also radiating away from our planet in the form of ‘infrared radiation’ which passes freely thru the atmospheric gases of nitrogen and oxygen which do not absorb heat. Indeed, if it weren’t for greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide that ‘do interact’ strongly with infrared energy and ‘impede the escape’ of Earth’s radiant heat, then the planet would be perpetually frozen solid. Thankfully, even though greenhouse gases comprise only 4/10ths of one percent of the atmosphere, they are so powerful that they maintain a ‘blanketing effect’ by constantly ‘absorbing and releasing’ infrared heat energy over and over, again and again. In doing so, they gyrate wildly, thus causing them to vigorously collide with other atmospheric molecules which, in turn, collide with other air molecules, imparting the kinetic energy of motion throughout the atmosphere - and this vibratory state registers as temperature.
    For the big picture, search:
    Marcott reconstruction chart
    For more, search:
    ‘CO2 infrared radiation quantum level’
    ‘Amplified greenhouse effect’
    ‘Doable drawdown solution global warming’

  • @lucyxx6022
    @lucyxx6022 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is such a great video. You explain it all so well, now I finally understand :)

  • @lorenzoblum868
    @lorenzoblum868 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    WHAT IS THE CARBON FOOTPRINT OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ?

  • @deenichannel4756
    @deenichannel4756 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sir u teaches awesome i am from india

    • @BeverlyBiology
      @BeverlyBiology  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for the kind words... best wishes to you

    • @Duneuniverse
      @Duneuniverse 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      FAIZANE RAZA you dumb

    • @thecousins626
      @thecousins626 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      FAIZANE RAZA you smell like pollution

    • @Duneuniverse
      @Duneuniverse 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Paige Montgomery you smell like rotten beans

  • @natashacarroll6322
    @natashacarroll6322 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you do another video talking about the energy levels UV and infra red energy.

  • @kalpavriksha666
    @kalpavriksha666 ปีที่แล้ว

    Save carbon sin and climate healing where we focus to join hands.mother earth was nice to us now we didn't respect so let us love mother earth.take green pledge.indivudally we take responsibility we have to face.

  • @eirikmurito
    @eirikmurito 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can see why the politicians wants to believe in global warming, it all boils down to simple psychology. The feeling of being the hero that saves the world from something can be tempting, especially for a politician. And a youtuber..

  • @asadickson
    @asadickson 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video! thank you so much

  • @arkiebarkie5656
    @arkiebarkie5656 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice 👌

  • @natashacarroll6322
    @natashacarroll6322 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    and how they contribute to the greenhouse effect

  • @rogercoppock407
    @rogercoppock407 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    No. In the greenhouse effect, sunlight does not REFLECT it is absorbed during the day and RERADIATED at night as infrared.

  • @ngwuruth3810
    @ngwuruth3810 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Learnt alot from this
    Thanks

  • @Goodtimes523
    @Goodtimes523 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s very cold in Albeeta and I can’t grow food for my hungry family. Can we somehow use the world’s extra money to move the planet’s heat to the north and the cold to the south? Please anyone send heat to Alberta if you can. My heating bill is too high.

  • @bartonpaullevenson3427
    @bartonpaullevenson3427 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Agricultural greenhouses work largely through suppressing convection.

    • @niko-laus
      @niko-laus 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      in the 1950 tis i experienced enhanced co2 levels in greenhouses up to in the 1 to 4 % increase manly done to make tree seedlings stronger faster the result was somehow surprising effective 2-5 times faster grow

  • @sucharithaboorgula5311
    @sucharithaboorgula5311 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    i didn't understand anything.... I thought u were talking about green house gases

  • @raquelibanezmarcilla6860
    @raquelibanezmarcilla6860 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love it too thanks!

  • @Fafonidas
    @Fafonidas 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So with this logic, the higher you go in the atmosphere the higher the temp gets. It must be scorching hot at 40,000 feet......I think our greenhouse may be bass ackwards.

    • @stopit9280
      @stopit9280 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      What makes you think that?

    • @itoko1706
      @itoko1706 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Uuhhhhhh actually it’s the exact opposite dude, the higher u get the colder it gets

    • @Fafonidas
      @Fafonidas 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@itoko1706 that's my point. How'd you miss it? I made it rather obvious.

  • @noperrr7279
    @noperrr7279 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    welp I'm only here cause of school quarintine
    coronavirus sucks

  • @jemmiexxx9978
    @jemmiexxx9978 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you summarize this video for me sir ?

  • @Noberryy
    @Noberryy 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    It helps a lot thanks

  • @strgrlcrwy
    @strgrlcrwy 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Super easy to follow and organized super well. Though I do think that more people biking and carpooling will not help much and that it's really countries and emission heavy industries that should be regulated.

  • @bridien8216
    @bridien8216 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    so helpful!!! thankyou

  • @dudurosca273
    @dudurosca273 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Milankovitch cycles, find this on youtube

    • @bartonpaullevenson3427
      @bartonpaullevenson3427 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Milankovic cycles govern ice ages but can't account for the present global warming.

    • @dudurosca273
      @dudurosca273 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bartonpaullevenson3427 why you say that? Global warming it's a lie !

    • @bartonpaullevenson3427
      @bartonpaullevenson3427 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dudurosca273 If you have proof it's a lie, produce it. If you have no proof, STFU.

  • @ritabhattarai4951
    @ritabhattarai4951 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cfc gas.??????

  • @katiposcotty
    @katiposcotty 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    But Mars's atmosphere is 950 000 ppm co2 vs Earth's 400 ppm co2.
    So there should very much be a "greenhouse effect" on Mars.

    • @bartonpaullevenson3427
      @bartonpaullevenson3427 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is; it's about 4 K. Pressure on Mars is much lower, so the absorption lines are narrower.

  • @the-random-ones6982
    @the-random-ones6982 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    literally what everyone in the comments said is what i wanna say

  • @homegardening2766
    @homegardening2766 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love it❤

  • @deenichannel4756
    @deenichannel4756 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And studying in 10th clasd

  • @mikaihan
    @mikaihan 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good Explanation
    .

  • @miroslavjosipovic5014
    @miroslavjosipovic5014 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video is extremely wrong, it is certainly not adequate for teachers.

  • @cesarflores474
    @cesarflores474 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    bring back Kobe Kuiz!!!!

  • @rabbisk4989
    @rabbisk4989 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    And the ice glaciers melting it's just melting that was formed during the Ice Age the Ice Age

    • @jmuld1
      @jmuld1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      But did the glacial melting start before or after mans co2.

    • @Dundoril
      @Dundoril 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hm we are in a ice Age right now

    • @jmuld1
      @jmuld1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Dundoril We are always in or out of an ice age, your point?

    • @Dundoril
      @Dundoril 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jmuld1 my point is that the comment of Wyatt does not make much sense...

    • @jmuld1
      @jmuld1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Dundoril We all know what he meant, you sir have no science so you attack the person.

  • @clopediaa
    @clopediaa 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yooo G07

  • @C.Hawkshaw
    @C.Hawkshaw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why didn’t you talk about man-MADE (not naturally occurring) greenhouse gases like:
    Perflourocarbons: used for aluminum production.
    Hydro fluorocarbons: used for refridgerants, industrial processes, electronics.
    Sulfur hexafluoride: used an an electrical insulator.
    All the man-created greenhouse gases (man did not invent methane or carbon dioxide) are thousands of times more dangerous to life on earth than automobile emissions.
    What’s up with that?

  • @nishamoljijo
    @nishamoljijo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    😁❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @rabbisk4989
    @rabbisk4989 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    And less angry tree huggers

  • @rogercoppock407
    @rogercoppock407 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a terrible explanation of the planetary greenhouse effect.

  • @rambler241
    @rambler241 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    No, the atmosphere DOESN'T "act like a greenhouse". Flawed - like over 90% of the "explanations" of the "greenhouse effect" on TH-cam.

    • @SewayPL
      @SewayPL 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Amazing refutation wow

  • @robertnitschke89
    @robertnitschke89 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    not true

    • @teatime6275
      @teatime6275 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bruh what? You are so wrong. This is all true... You're just dumb asf