Matt Frei seems to fiind the need for clear explanation to be a continuing annoyance to him. Your job Matt is to allow factual reasoned views to be heard. It is not to air your own prejudices against Israel. So wind your neck in.
Frei had a prepared script, a bunch of below the belt questions meant to make Ms Hausdorff look clumsy but as usual she held her ground and outsmarted the playground bully.
He is clearly biased. Israel not letting journalists in Gaza? He is ignoring the fact that 189 journalists were murdered in Gaza by Hamas, including their own. So the only way for them to go to Gaza and be safe is with the IDF. Somehow he twists the facts
They are not misconceptions. He knew exactly what he was doing. He is an experienced journalist and knows the truth, but he doesn't like the truth, because it interferes with his anti-Israel agenda.Natasha handled it with great poise and dignity and he used the “saved by the bell“ technique to cut her short.
He can't take in so much information in one go. She is an information recall powerhouse. No doubt she knows the subject in great detail having to go through it many many times. Here he doesn't acknowledge her information, he just has questions prepared from the start that he is eager to ask whilst ignoring her answers to the previous question. She is clearly qualified with knowledge and he isn't to the extend that he can't deal with most of her answers.
This interviewer is not interested in listening. Making grunting noises throughout. Then complaining that the answer by Natasha was ‘too long’ for him. He just wanted a platform for his propaganda’questions’
He can't take in so much information in one go- not many people could unfortunately. She is an information recall powerhouse. No doubt she knows the subject in great detail having to go through it many many times. Here he doesn't acknowledge her information, he just has questions prepared from the start that he is eager to ask whilst ignoring her answers to the previous question. She is clearly qualified with knowledge and he isn't to the extent that he can't deal with most of her answers. Generally MSM is low information and doesn't have ability to grasp a clear overview of the conflict having been misled by the easist and most convenient interpretations the majority demographic of the Middle East offers. Israel loses arguments having to explain to this ' low information' majority. Maybe Natasha would get point across to this side if she chose her main point, asked him to acknowledge that or admit that he didn't know something and then continue to the next point. This would be difficult to do because all the factors are necessary to outline because they reinforce each other to make her point. All of this communication is then required to be condensed into a short space of time. This is an illustration of what the verbal defence of Israel is usually up against. Its still Jews are a minority having to defend themselves against a misrepresenting consensus in this world.
He never would. His show is contrived so that he never gets challenged by informed experts with different views to himself. It's why it's not worth listening to him, even if you're the sort of person who wants to hear alternative views.
"Natasha, you've given one of the longest answers in the history of this program..." Lol And the US Democratic candidate for president couldn't handle being in front of a crowd without a teleprompter. Seriously, it's almost poetic watching a good intellect rattle on because her brain literally knows everything she's talking about. I'm in love.
He cant stop himself from trying to discredit what you say ...................... Im afraid common sense in this world is a thing of the past . Any Israeli is welcome in my home ! Greetings from Ireland . We are not all Blind here!
Matt Frei says, that in other active war zones such as Ukraine, journalists have absolute liberty to talk to whoever they want .... that is an absurd comparison. 1) The war zones and actual military operations in Ukraine are of a totally different nature. In Gaza it is largely face to face combat, obviously allowing journalists to wander around in this situation cold seriously jeopardize operations and safety. His argument is absurd and shallow. 2) Ukraine has actually arrested and silenced journalists which did not go along with the 'official narrative. So it only allows access to _selected_ 'journalists'. 3) Many (most?) journalists out there have an innate anti Israel bias, as has been proven to be the case, time and time again. So to grant access to people who will only use the opportunity to obtain credibility for their lies is absurd. 4) Why give equal credence to claims from an organization founded and run by terrorists who repeatedly invert the basic facts of history to prop up their twisted rationale and justify their murderous charter?
As I have commented already, many journalists were given the opportunity to go to Gaza, 189 of them were murdered by Hamas( that's the number I've heard from Israelis), Some so called journalists were members of hamas, worked for AlJazeera, and themselves participated in massacre and keeping the hostages in their houses. So isn't it just prudent for Israel to have them with the IDF? Their credentials should be checked and so forth. There are security concerns when it comes to being with the IDF as well, for Israel, not just for journalists. this guy can't help himself, he is clearly biased
@darkfielddiggermicrosafari you are welcome and I agree: the comparison with Ukraine is absurd. The only similarity I see when it comes to these two conflicts is the timing.
Well done Natasha, for getting the facts out and not allowing the host to derail you with questions designed to support his narrative. Accurate and complete answers from someone with expertise should always be preferred over short answers that scratch the surface or prop up narrative.
The interviewer w is awful. He kept trying to insert his own opinions, clearing his throat and hmmming. He's way out of his league with Natasha and could benefit from actually listening to her.
Does this brilliant media star not know that Hamas doesn't allow "independent" reporters? That they must have a "minder" who they appoint to insure that things go as Hamas wants?
I'm not Jewish yet I feel sick listening to the desperation in that interviewer's voice to pin something sinister on Israel. It's the only country not allowed to defend itself. We're in 2024 and still antisemitism from our media happens? It makes me so ashamed to be British. Natasha, how you handle this is so admirable. Bless you for being such an amazing human being.
Maybe you’re not Jewish, but you’ve observed quite remarkably what it’s like to be one. Thank you for saying something , and I wish you to never know what it’s feel like
Shalom thanks for keeping us informed & up to date, on everything. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defending his people & Nation Israel (never ever back down), keep moving forward & stand forever strong against ((ALL)) who want to harm you Israel. I stand with you Israel, all the IDF, & all of the people of Israel God bless & protect Bibi & all the people of Israel.🎗🇮🇱✡🇮🇱🎗❤👑❤🎗🇮🇱✡🇮🇱🎗
He asked whether it was possible for Israeli politicians to commit crimes against humanity regardless of their origin - she should have just answered with a clear “No.”
Who is this guy? From the outset he's resistant. The case against Israel is clearly bogus. Anyone saying otherwise is either naive or dishonest. This guy I suspect is the latter. Well done Natasha for holding the line.
This was an interview with Matt Frei where he interrupted Miss Hausdorff in the first minute of her answer and she very politely told him to wait until she had finished speaking and he sat quietly trying to interrupt. For a journalist who has not been into gaza his knowledge is very limited, he only repeats what the Hamas "Stringers" tell him, stringers are gazan residents who only submit what hamas terrorists allow them to, and he embelshes those reports with his distorted views of the action in gaza which are very anti-Israel, these views are most probably more of anger because he has not been allowed into the war zone. He safely reports from the lounge of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, obviously this upsets his over inflated ego. He said he was prepared to take the risk, soldiers are being killed every day by snipers and in booby trapped locations and Mr Frei would be too much of a liability to be with a group of journalists in such dangerous conditions,
We hereby, as the Supreme International Court of Justice in 2024, issue arrest warrants to Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, Adolf Hitler and Benjamin Netanyahu. May justice be served
He sounds like he wants to be the only one talking with no interest on listening to Natasha, all I hear is hm, hm aha,,right…rushing her. As usual Natasha shines with her answers.
Matt frei rockette apologist let the sir sir wahf wahf end his Bab Bill but actually did the standard trick of cutting Natasha off with nudge nudge wink wink innuendo insinuations that of course she could not answer - she had been cut off!
Well done Ms Hausdorff. And all well said. The ICC has acted entirely without jurisdiction and contrary to treaty and other foundations of its own law. The ICC has more in common with the Volksgericht than what we would understand as a court.
I just love how they hold Israel to the kind of high impossible standards they would never hold themselves to. Oh, and that journalist should know he can always cross the bloody EGYPTIAN BORDER with gaza and enter there...oh, actually he can't. Why?? I wonder if he ever asks himself that. Thank you, Natasha. I learned a lot from you.
This spokesman it's really abrasive I honestly don't think he has any respect for people when he talks in his voice. He has to be reprimanded.. and he has to let his guests to finish their answers without being impatient..
If a journalist request to go into Gaza at his/her own risk and is killed, would IDF be responsible or would the death be considered a kind of second hand suicide?
Thank you Natasha ❤
i love Natasha!! facts and only facts, spoken so eloquently, never wavering... amazing!
Well said, Natasha 👏
Natasha brilliant as always
Thanks for having Natasha on
Matt Frei seems to fiind the need for clear explanation to be a continuing annoyance to him. Your job Matt is to allow factual reasoned views to be heard. It is not to air your own prejudices against Israel. So wind your neck in.
Excellent explanation. Thank you, Natasha...🇮🇱🙏💙
Natasha Hausdorff was brilliant as usual. 👍
The interviewer seemed to have some missconceptions he was unwilling to let go of.
Agreed!, the passive aggressiveness from him was up on full
Frei had a prepared script, a bunch of below the belt questions meant to make Ms Hausdorff look clumsy but as usual she held her ground and outsmarted the playground bully.
He is clearly biased. Israel not letting journalists in Gaza? He is ignoring the fact that 189 journalists were murdered in Gaza by Hamas, including their own. So the only way for them to go to Gaza and be safe is with the IDF. Somehow he twists the facts
They are not misconceptions. He knew exactly what he was doing. He is an experienced journalist and knows the truth, but he doesn't like the truth, because it interferes with his anti-Israel agenda.Natasha handled it with great poise and dignity and he used the “saved by the bell“ technique to cut her short.
History will not look favorably on those who align themselves with terrorism. Thank you yet again Natasha Hausdorff.
The overwhelming irony isn't lost on the sane amongst us
Natasha speaks so eloquently and so intelligently. I wish the interviewer would not interrupt her.
He can't take in so much information in one go. She is an information recall powerhouse. No doubt she knows the subject in great detail having to go through it many many times.
Here he doesn't acknowledge her information, he just has questions prepared from the start that he is eager to ask whilst ignoring her answers to the previous question.
She is clearly qualified with knowledge and he isn't to the extend that he can't deal with most of her answers.
You did a great job Natasha. Thank you for your explanation.
Natasha as usual is brilliant! Matt Frei, by comparison displays his inherent lack of knowledge regarding the political situation!
he's as biased as Jeremy Bowen!
Indeed he is an apologist for Rockettes
"Is it not possible for Israeli politicians to commit crimes against humanity?" That's an awful line of questioning.
Wow, that guy is just trying to push against the truth to make it look his way.
Good thing Natasha is one of the best debating people around
and she doesn't get flustered!! Bravo Natasha!
The longest answer in the history of LBC is 4.5 minutes. We can sure expect a lot of depth from that news source. But yes, Ms. Hausdorff nailed it.
Of course matt "rockettes apologetics" free cut her off spewing innuendo and insinuation
She is brilliant!
Elegant answers from Hausdorff despite Frei not so interested in listening. Well done Hausdorff!
Then a reporter gets killed and IDF gets the blame - so stop complaining!!!!
Independent reporting from the Gaza Strip? Are you kidding? Hamas would not allow that!
Is he supposed to interview her or only speak his opinions???? Terrible interviewer!!
He can't hide his bias! Kudos to Natasha.
Natasha is amazing
This interviewer is not interested in listening. Making grunting noises throughout. Then complaining that the answer by Natasha was ‘too long’ for him. He just wanted a platform for his propaganda’questions’
Spot on!
To be fair, the woman is 1000 times smarter than that bigot and he doesn't understand a word she said
At last.. someone who knows what they are talking about
Natasha Hausdorff is consistently head and shoulders above other commentators.
Natasha Hausdorff was as articulate, eloquent and accurate as ever.
He can't take in so much information in one go- not many people could unfortunately. She is an information recall powerhouse. No doubt she knows the subject in great detail having to go through it many many times.
Here he doesn't acknowledge her information, he just has questions prepared from the start that he is eager to ask whilst ignoring her answers to the previous question.
She is clearly qualified with knowledge and he isn't to the extent that he can't deal with most of her answers.
Generally MSM is low information and doesn't have ability to grasp a clear overview of the conflict having been misled by the easist and most convenient interpretations the majority demographic of the Middle East offers.
Israel loses arguments having to explain to this ' low information' majority.
Maybe Natasha would get point across to this side if she chose her main point, asked him to acknowledge that or admit that he didn't know something and then continue to the next point. This would be difficult to do because all the factors are necessary to outline because they reinforce each other to make her point. All of this communication is then required to be condensed into a short space of time. This is an illustration of what the verbal defence of Israel is usually up against. Its still Jews are a minority having to defend themselves against a misrepresenting consensus in this world.
It’s crazy how everyone is ok with human rights law until it is applied to Israel. Bias much?
I'd love to see James O'Brien have a sit down with Natasha, i think he'd find it a bit more of a struggle than his average numbnut callers
He never would. His show is contrived so that he never gets challenged by informed experts with different views to himself. It's why it's not worth listening to him, even if you're the sort of person who wants to hear alternative views.
The only alternative views allowed on are those where emotions outway control of the facts
A very clear answer. Wonderful
Natasha, he is not listening to you!!!! You are defending Israel and speaking the truth, so he doesn't want to hear.
"Natasha, you've given one of the longest answers in the history of this program..."
Lol
And the US Democratic candidate for president couldn't handle being in front of a crowd without a teleprompter.
Seriously, it's almost poetic watching a good intellect rattle on because her brain literally knows everything she's talking about.
I'm in love.
Natasha for Prime Minister & President!!
He wants her to stop educating him
Because he's a fool
God bless Natasha for saying the plain truth!
Brilliant Natasha!
Such an uncouth and rude man!
LBC does not post this interview, nor the preceding interview with Sir Jeffrey.
I wonder why...
I stand with Israel, Truth and God ❤
Bravo to Natasha Hausdorff 👏👏👏
Douglas Murray went into Gaza ages ago. Did you talk to him Matthew? You should go in and do some independent reporting for a change.
She speaks very well.
Well done natasha! What would we do without you …? 👏👏
Unclear and scary to think about
Natasha never fails!!! She is amazing! 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
LBC just can't live with Natasha Hausdorff, she is brilliant!
Interviewer so uncomfortable by Natasha’s full and intelligent answers.
To be fair she makes me uncomfortable, too, and she’s defending me.
She’s too smart for me and too pretty
Thank you Natasha Hausdorff. It looks like a joke and a provocation to put an arrest on a dead body, when it comes to the Hamas side.
He cant stop himself from trying to discredit what you say ...................... Im afraid common sense in this world is a thing of the past . Any Israeli is welcome in my home ! Greetings from Ireland . We are not all Blind here!
Thank you for speaking out and supporting Israel. I hope the good people of your country like yourself are able to wake up before it’s too late.
Thank you for speaking out and supporting Israel. I hope the good people of your country like yourself are able to wake up before it’s too late.
What a ninny of an interviewer.
Matt Frei says, that in other active war zones such as Ukraine, journalists have absolute liberty to talk to whoever they want .... that is an absurd comparison.
1) The war zones and actual military operations in Ukraine are of a totally different nature. In Gaza it is largely face to face combat, obviously allowing journalists to wander around in this situation cold seriously jeopardize operations and safety. His argument is absurd and shallow.
2) Ukraine has actually arrested and silenced journalists which did not go along with the 'official narrative. So it only allows access to _selected_ 'journalists'.
3) Many (most?) journalists out there have an innate anti Israel bias, as has been proven to be the case, time and time again. So to grant access to people who will only use the opportunity to obtain credibility for their lies is absurd.
4) Why give equal credence to claims from an organization founded and run by terrorists who repeatedly invert the basic facts of history to prop up their twisted rationale and justify their murderous charter?
As I have commented already, many journalists were given the opportunity to go to Gaza, 189 of them were murdered by Hamas( that's the number I've heard from Israelis), Some so called journalists were members of hamas, worked for AlJazeera, and themselves participated in massacre and keeping the hostages in their houses. So isn't it just prudent for Israel to have them with the IDF? Their credentials should be checked and so forth. There are security concerns when it comes to being with the IDF as well, for Israel, not just for journalists. this guy can't help himself, he is clearly biased
@@lk80630 Thank you, very astute & helpful comment👋
@darkfielddiggermicrosafari you are welcome and I agree: the comparison with Ukraine is absurd. The only similarity I see when it comes to these two conflicts is the timing.
Natasha spoke eloquently and clearly especially in the face of this hostile interviewer.
Well done Natasha, for getting the facts out and not allowing the host to derail you with questions designed to support his narrative. Accurate and complete answers from someone with expertise should always be preferred over short answers that scratch the surface or prop up narrative.
Super truth. Well done NATASHA. ICC is so unfortunate of law abuse
The interviewer w is awful. He kept trying to insert his own opinions, clearing his throat and hmmming. He's way out of his league with Natasha and could benefit from actually listening to her.
Does this brilliant media star not know that Hamas doesn't allow "independent" reporters? That they must have a "minder" who they appoint to insure that things go as Hamas wants?
May God bless n protect it's choosen people Israel....love to hear the law Vs law
KUDOS NATASHA YOU ARE SO ELOQUENT AND IN CONTROL WHEN SPEAKING TO A BULLY LIKE MATT FREI.
I like her
Karim Khan hasn't proven his own innocence yet. Dr heal thyself.
I hope they find him guilty and he is shamed, cancelled and then permanently debarred. Somehow I think the Me Too movement will be totally silent.
The interviewer did not understand even half of Natasha's argumentation.
I'm not Jewish yet I feel sick listening to the desperation in that interviewer's voice to pin something sinister on Israel. It's the only country not allowed to defend itself. We're in 2024 and still antisemitism from our media happens? It makes me so ashamed to be British. Natasha, how you handle this is so admirable. Bless you for being such an amazing human being.
Maybe you’re not Jewish, but you’ve observed quite remarkably what it’s like to be one.
Thank you for saying something , and I wish you to never know what it’s feel like
Thank you for your accurate observations!! Gd bless you for speaking up
Natasha ❤👍🏻
You got ran over buddy. You were out of your league my boy
lbc is so biased dont know why natasha went on their propaganda channel
At least as important, if not more, to talk to the unconvinced, rather the convinced, I think.
And to their credit, at least they brought her on
Shalom thanks for keeping us informed & up to date, on everything.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defending his people & Nation
Israel (never ever back down), keep moving forward & stand forever
strong against ((ALL)) who want to harm you Israel. I stand with you
Israel, all the IDF, & all of the people of Israel God bless & protect
Bibi & all the people of Israel.🎗🇮🇱✡🇮🇱🎗❤👑❤🎗🇮🇱✡🇮🇱🎗
He asked whether it was possible for Israeli politicians to commit crimes against humanity regardless of their origin - she should have just answered with a clear “No.”
If no independent reporters then why a ruling????
Excellent point
Ok, took me a few seconds. Indeed excellent
Natasha is so brilliant. So sharp
Why does he keep making those creepy moaning sounds...why can't he just listen silently.
Interviewer needs some manners (and intellect). Natasha wipes the floor with him.
Mrs. Hausdorff as always crystal clear!
Who is this guy? From the outset he's resistant. The case against Israel is clearly bogus. Anyone saying otherwise is either naive or dishonest. This guy I suspect is the latter. Well done Natasha for holding the line.
This was an interview with Matt Frei where he interrupted Miss Hausdorff in the first minute of her answer and she very politely told him to wait until she had finished speaking and he sat quietly trying to interrupt. For a journalist who has not been into gaza his knowledge is very limited, he only repeats what the Hamas "Stringers" tell him, stringers are gazan residents who only submit what hamas terrorists allow them to, and he embelshes those reports with his distorted views of the action in gaza which are very anti-Israel, these views are most probably more of anger because he has not been allowed into the war zone.
He safely reports from the lounge of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, obviously this upsets his over inflated ego. He said he was prepared to take the risk, soldiers are being killed every day by snipers and in booby trapped locations and Mr Frei would be too much of a liability to be with a group of journalists in such dangerous conditions,
ישר כח אחותי
We hereby, as the Supreme International Court of Justice in 2024, issue arrest warrants to Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, Adolf Hitler and Benjamin Netanyahu.
May justice be served
Thank you Natasha for being a tireless advocate for truth❤
I know many journalists that went into Gaza
He sounds like he wants to be the only one talking with no interest on listening to Natasha, all I hear is hm, hm aha,,right…rushing her. As usual Natasha shines with her answers.
He thought he could outsmart her ...
She is AMAZING!
0:13
What is the bloody point of an interview of such gravity in which the interviewer expresses impatience all the way through.
The interviewer is bias and would not be let into Ukraine unless he agreed for his material to be checked by them.
LBC or lies,bollacks,crap
Well done Natasha!
Bravo Natasha
Thank you Natasha for clarifying the issue. The decision really seemed strange to me.
disband this travesty of a court.
She's excellent.
Natasha has a lot of patience to debank libels and tales of hamasniks of all stripes. Intelligent and Beautiful inside out woman! ❤
This interviewer needs to learn some manners. He comes off as being very rude. Kudos to Natasha for standing her ground.
James O’Brien will avoid these lady like cancer 😂😂😂
He'd be speechless - hopefully!!!
she is a voice of reason. It is hard to interrupt the voice of reason.
Matt frei rockette apologist let the sir sir wahf wahf end his Bab Bill but actually did the standard trick of cutting Natasha off with nudge nudge wink wink innuendo insinuations that of course she could not answer - she had been cut off!
She us brilliant
Well done Ms Hausdorff. And all well said. The ICC has acted entirely without jurisdiction and contrary to treaty and other foundations of its own law. The ICC has more in common with the Volksgericht than what we would understand as a court.
This Host is steve Bannon twin
👏👏👏🇬🇧♥️🇮🇱👍👍👍
👑👑👑
I just love how they hold Israel to the kind of high impossible standards they would never hold themselves to. Oh, and that journalist should know he can always cross the bloody EGYPTIAN BORDER with gaza and enter there...oh, actually he can't. Why?? I wonder if he ever asks himself that. Thank you, Natasha. I learned a lot from you.
Karim Khan....yeah...what a surprise
This spokesman it's really abrasive I honestly don't think he has any respect for people when he talks in his voice. He has to be reprimanded.. and he has to let his guests to finish their answers without being impatient..
If a journalist request to go into Gaza at his/her own risk and is killed, would IDF be responsible or would the death be considered a kind of second hand suicide?