I love how delighted she was 😄 She wasn’t greedy, she played her game well and came out with a huge amount of money which she was happy about - good on her!
@@harleyjo4875 It does matter. If she had gone for a higher amount and lost, her charity wouldn't have received anything. She played it smart, and sought a goal that was obtainable.
Technically, the sun doesn't provide vitamin D, it lets your body produce it. But yeah, everyone should know that. Stress under time constraint can make you do silly things though.
There's a Dutch version of this? "And here dey come de Chashersh: De Beest! De Foxen! De Menaas! De one what looksh like a round Queen Beatrix! De Sinaasappelman! 🍊 De Dyke Destroyer!"
D'youknow what, it is a bizarre sight for me, seeing Rachel Riley outside of a quiz show that isn't 8 of 10 does countdown. And im glad she beat the chasers. So glad.😊
@@markylon they don't watch it - unless there's jokes and bright lights, they don't understand it. They most likely don't even realise Countdown is its own thing.
@@sarcasticstartrek7719 actually I'm in a different country, we don't get the regular countdown, for some reason, one of our networks decided to pick up 8 out of 10 cats does then, several years later, 8 out 10, I'm only familiar with the original show through anecdotes from Susie or Rachel and any time Jimmy makes Carol jokes at Rachel's expense
She pisses me off that she is so perfect in every bloody way that you can't dislike her... I like to imagine that she's a real piece of work when the cameras aren't on her 😂
4:30 - It is a little mean. First ATM was in 1967, and the devaluation of the pound happened in the early 1970s. Of course it would make no sense to have a ten quid limit after that, but in 1967, ten quid was worth roughly 200 pounds today.
If we look at inflation from the first ATM in June 1967 (a few months before Wilson devalued the pound) to a decade later in June 1976 (pretty much exactly when the pound hit its low against the dollar), prices increased by a factor of about 2.6. That's a lot less than the factor a 5 difference between the correct answer and Rachel's guess. £50 was still a lot of money after the devaluation in the early 70's.
I’m pretty sure this was recorded on a Sunday as Rachel was on Sunday Brunch on CH4 and they were knocking back Drinks 🍸 and then she said ‘What am I doing, I’m going to record Beat the chasers next’ lol
Rachel is all natural in how she does things, imo.....she doesn't seem to put on a show or pretend. And you could really see it here. When she won, that was just a pure natural...and stunned reaction from her. It was a beautiful moment.
@@CB-xr1eg That comment could apply to, virtually, anything and, as you said,I quoted him, which makes it clear it was his opinion so any viewers can judge whether they believe him. It's not like me, for example, saying "Fred is NOT well because Tom has seen him and said so" as opposed to "Fres is not well ACCORDING to Tom, who has seen him! See the difference?
@@Isleofskye You said "you're right", implying that she was indeed nervous, a fact. I guess what you really meant was "you're right that she was observed to be nervous" ... but it was expressed in such a way that implied the former in normal English structure.
When the contestant gets asked which is the coldest season and the chasers get asked what Dr Barnardo's first name was, I can't help thinking that the difficulty levels are somewhat biased in the contestant's favour!
@@mcgoverg1I always think they have the questions a bit easier for the celebrity contestants so there’s a better chance they’ll win some money for their charity.
and yet the chaser got vitamin D wrong. Seemed like a "gimme" question right there. Maybe there's just a list of questions, and whoever gets them gets them.
Absolutely agree-Rachel is not only beautiful-she has a beautiful nature-she's friendly . Kind. Respectful if those things were not enough already she is also very intelligent-the whole world is asking what is a woman-I think her name is Rachel?.
The format doesn't really make much sense - having more chasers playing doesn't necessarily make them quicker, because the main thing that ticks down the clock is the host reading the questions, not the answering. That being said, Rachel did great. Beautiful and so happy with herself.
3:23 - Rachel, being a great mathematician on her feet, PLUS using her logic and sense of how people function in society these days - that was a great educated guess! I hadn't even thought of the "asleep" aspect ... and so I guess that when people are awake - active and very keen people probably check their phone every 4 /5/ 6 minutes or even 7 / 8, so that bumps it up to 12? Great thinking by Rachel, especially under the lights and cameras while she's being tested!
Only 1 chaser can answer at once, so I wouldn’t even say 33% more jeopardy, as their knowledge bases will overlap a lot, so probably a lot less than 33% additional risk to add a chaser
@@Chrissaces1 Yeah I agree, and 2 seconds could be critical, but she still had a huge margin of safety. I'd understand staying under a certain amount to duck a specific chaser, but that wasn't the case either. She underplayed her hand.
I've always loved watching Rachel on "Countdown". Obviously she's beautiful, but she's also quite brilliant. And here on "Chasers" she again proves it.
the questions to the chasers seemed to take a lot longer to read out than Rachels, i doubt its been manipulated for charity purposes thats just my takeaway
The dark destroyer is wrong. Barclays Enfield cash machine was operational in 1966 - though Reg arney was the first person to be photographed using it the next year.
I’m honestly not sure that Beat The Chasers is any easier on the chasers, I’ve alw felt (as an observer) that going solo is easier bc you don’t waste time seeing if someone is gonna buzz in
Notice how at 4:23, Brad says "Correct answer is?" When he should've asked if 'c' WAS the correct answer. Could be that it's all pre-determined or that he just knew the answer since he's so old (sorry Bradley)
Seems like it worked as a disadvantage to the chaser’s to have three of them as you lose time waiting to see if a teammate will answer before guessing or passing.
Rachel Riley is such an adorable and classy person. Such a fantastic role model for our whole society. If only we could have more people like her amongst us.
If Rachel was looking at the middle two values, 3 chasers made more sense. An entire extra chaser doesn't seem worth it for only a £10,000 increase and 2 extra seconds.
Only a 10k increase is 50% more, and only 33% more jeopardy adding another chaser. Even with the 2 second offset, mathematically 30k was the better option for risk and reward.
She really should have taken the 30 grand offer. it's 10 grand more for only two seconds more time. Although she did get lucky with quite a few wrong answers from the Chasers that tipped the clocks in her favour.
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
That explosion of emotion from Rachel was unexpected and awesome!
8:37! Awesome stuff :)
I love how delighted she was 😄
She wasn’t greedy, she played her game well and came out with a huge amount of money which she was happy about - good on her!
It wouldn’t matter if she was greedy it was all going to charity anyhow.
@@harleyjo4875 It does matter. If she had gone for a higher amount and lost, her charity wouldn't have received anything. She played it smart, and sought a goal that was obtainable.
@@harleyjo4875exactly Punk 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I love how Mark said C for the sunshine vitamin, I feel like everyone knows that the sun provides vitamin D
Technically, the sun doesn't provide vitamin D, it lets your body produce it. But yeah, everyone should know that. Stress under time constraint can make you do silly things though.
Oranges are often associated with sunshine, and vitamin C. I can see how he got there under pressure.
Sunny D mate lol.
He was probably thinking of the old Sunny D drink, which contained vitamin C. I instinctively thought of the same thing.
@@tmbsilver1313mate I haven’t had that in years they 100% have to have it in my local co-op (only shop by mine open until 11pm) 🤣🤣
I was at the filming of this in March. She was nervous as hell during the whole thing but well done, Rachel!
That really came across and she is very experienced so I was surprised:)
I was there too, a few rows up to the right of where they enter :)
What happened to the news reader and steven mangan though?
It must have been the pressures of everyone's expectations on her because she seems invincible on Countdown.
I’m Spartacus
Yeah, even in this clip, she was frowning almost all the way through it.
Her astonishment and joy at the end is SO lovely, so very very sweet, actually made me nearly cry haha
Yeah it was pretty tight.
There were ninjas cutting onions here too!
Same ❤ Rachel (and Susie)
Seeing Rachels excitement is purely wonderful.
She beat the chase twice and now she’s beaten the chasers, is there no end to her talent? 😊
Dancing? ;-)
I would like her to beat me
@@conniebenny LMAO ...first thing I thought of.....
rofl
@@conniebenny
She wasn't great on Richard Osman's House Of Games
As a contestant, sadly not a winner, on the Dutch version.of this game, i know the pressure you feel on the clock. Very well done and truly deserved.
There's a Dutch version of this? "And here dey come de Chashersh: De Beest! De Foxen! De Menaas! De one what looksh like a round Queen Beatrix! De Sinaasappelman! 🍊 De Dyke Destroyer!"
@@liamwalsh4008 This is such an underrated comment. 10 stroop waffles out of 3 wooden cloggs.
@@liamwalsh4008idiot
The Dutch version aye? So no money is on offer when you win?
How interesting! What was the experience like?
D'youknow what, it is a bizarre sight for me, seeing Rachel Riley outside of a quiz show that isn't 8 of 10 does countdown. And im glad she beat the chasers. So glad.😊
what about countdown
4th time beating those "slackers"...😹😹😹
@@markylon they don't watch it - unless there's jokes and bright lights, they don't understand it. They most likely don't even realise Countdown is its own thing.
@@sarcasticstartrek7719 actually I'm in a different country, we don't get the regular countdown, for some reason, one of our networks decided to pick up 8 out of 10 cats does then, several years later, 8 out 10, I'm only familiar with the original show through anecdotes from Susie or Rachel and any time Jimmy makes Carol jokes at Rachel's expense
@@sarcasticstartrek7719 but uhm, thank you for making assumptions and belittling my intelligence by comparing my attention span to that of a toddler.
When she realised she’s won. Cute as it gets!
It is absolutely impossible NOT to love Rachel. What a lovely human being.
She pisses me off that she is so perfect in every bloody way that you can't dislike her... I like to imagine that she's a real piece of work when the cameras aren't on her 😂
Another celebrity happy with covid lockdowns and restriction of freedoms. Just one more naive smart person.
She left her husband 😂😂
To hear her talking about Jeremy corbin like a card carrying nazi was pretty infuriating
She’s a massive man United fan, as am I so that’s fine with me, but if you want to knock her down a little you could use that 😂
You can see the exact point she remembers she’s on the tv after the shock and excitement of the win
She's such a stunning & wonderful lady, and here she shows her true emotions, what a great sight to see ❤
Some of the questions in the beginning were ridiculous, well done Rachel.
She’s absolutely gorgeous !
Not as hot as she used to be but still looking good for someone approaching 40.
Even my old man who is 82 says that, but has she been seen without fakeup?...
@@larey12 She's approaching 40 now? :O. I'm sure count down women get old twice as fast as the rest of us lol
@@smithers4420 - Have to say that Carol Vorderman looks pretty damn good for 102.
@@larey12 Yeah,,, she has a new career; Stunt double for the Michelin Man.
So happy for Rachel, shes a true national treasure in the making!
She had some difficult questions. It was impressive how she knew the answers and stayed composed.
4:30 - It is a little mean. First ATM was in 1967, and the devaluation of the pound happened in the early 1970s. Of course it would make no sense to have a ten quid limit after that, but in 1967, ten quid was worth roughly 200 pounds today.
If we look at inflation from the first ATM in June 1967 (a few months before Wilson devalued the pound) to a decade later in June 1976 (pretty much exactly when the pound hit its low against the dollar), prices increased by a factor of about 2.6. That's a lot less than the factor a 5 difference between the correct answer and Rachel's guess. £50 was still a lot of money after the devaluation in the early 70's.
@@thomasdalton1508 Today the MAXIMUM you can take out is still a lot. Very few people ever take out the MAXIMUM amount they can.
@@thomasdalton1508 Ladies & Gentlemen, we have a complete nerd in the comment section.
he should join DullMensClub@@CB-xr1eg
My first ATM card in about 78 did indeed have a £10 limit. In fact, it was £10 or nothing 😊.
8:03 had me laughing. Much like how an irritated wife corrects her husband.
It was a pretty easy question
I was there that day, was a good show, its free to go so sign up people and experience it
I’m pretty sure this was recorded on a Sunday as Rachel was on Sunday Brunch on CH4 and they were knocking back Drinks 🍸 and then she said ‘What am I doing, I’m going to record Beat the chasers next’ lol
Damn, drunk earlier and clear headed as can be
Rachel is all natural in how she does things, imo.....she doesn't seem to put on a show or pretend. And you could really see it here. When she won, that was just a pure natural...and stunned reaction from her. It was a beautiful moment.
Rachel Riley is enchantingly delightful.
...for a Nazi.
@@aneng64 She's a Nazi? Riley? Oops! I meant really.
@@aneng64Nazis spawned you and your ilk.
Smart, beautiful and nice... I love Rachel!
simp & cuck
Bless her, she's so nervous but she's gorgeous as ever
A Guy ,on here,was at the recording and,you're right,he saif that she was extremely nervous.
@@Isleofskye You're literally quoting what another commenter said, how do you know he's not lying?
@@CB-xr1eg That comment could apply to, virtually, anything and, as you said,I quoted him, which makes it clear it was his opinion so any viewers can judge whether they believe him.
It's not like me, for example, saying "Fred is NOT well because Tom has seen him and said so" as opposed to "Fres is not well ACCORDING to Tom, who has seen him! See the difference?
@@Isleofskye You said "you're right", implying that she was indeed nervous, a fact. I guess what you really meant was "you're right that she was observed to be nervous" ... but it was expressed in such a way that implied the former in normal English structure.
@@natdenchfield8061 Yes. you're right.
When the contestant gets asked which is the coldest season and the chasers get asked what Dr Barnardo's first name was, I can't help thinking that the difficulty levels are somewhat biased in the contestant's favour!
But there were 3 of them against her.
@@mcgoverg1I always think they have the questions a bit easier for the celebrity contestants so there’s a better chance they’ll win some money for their charity.
Yeah, absolute joke. I don't think she even got any proper quizzing questions
and yet the chaser got vitamin D wrong. Seemed like a "gimme" question right there. Maybe there's just a list of questions, and whoever gets them gets them.
But the sunshine vitamin is obviously D for most people and Mark got it wrong
She absolutely blitzed that. Genuinely smart.
Intelligent but not smart should have gone for 30 thousand pounds it was only 2 extra seconds for chasing fools
@@sebastiananthony5442u BIG fool
@@sebastiananthony5442thank you captain hindsight
Absolutely agree-Rachel is not only beautiful-she has a beautiful nature-she's friendly . Kind. Respectful if those things were not enough already she is also very intelligent-the whole world is asking what is a woman-I think her name is Rachel?.
The format doesn't really make much sense - having more chasers playing doesn't necessarily make them quicker, because the main thing that ticks down the clock is the host reading the questions, not the answering. That being said, Rachel did great. Beautiful and so happy with herself.
The advantage more comes in the wider range of knowledge multiple people have compared to just one
It just increases their chances of getting a question right, however in this case unusually the beast was too sure of himself when he was wrong
Reg Varney was the first man to use an ATM in England. Two days later, the first person to forget his PIN was Blakey...
MBE. Bloody marvellous. A good pick at last.
Thanks for posting this I recorded it but I went out for 10 minutes I didn't watch this part and I've been looming for this for 2-3 weeks
Great stuff, good to watch this as i fell asleep when it was on and i love Rachel
Rachel is always a class act! Bravo on the win for the children!
Now I wanna see Rachel Riley vs Mark “the beast” Labbet in a maths contest.
3:23 - Rachel, being a great mathematician on her feet, PLUS using her logic and sense of how people function in society these days - that was a great educated guess! I hadn't even thought of the "asleep" aspect ... and so I guess that when people are awake - active and very keen people probably check their phone every 4 /5/ 6 minutes or even 7 / 8, so that bumps it up to 12? Great thinking by Rachel, especially under the lights and cameras while she's being tested!
Rachel is so good when it is necessary to take a guess. All the first questions were guess questions. I have seen her do this in the Chase before.
Not so good when guessing the cash point question was she?
@@CB-xr1eg Are you a Corbynite?
@@FedericoDLP Wtf? Why bring politics into it? Are you American?🙄
@@CB-xr1eg I asked you a simple question: Are you a Corbynite, then I will know who I am talking to.
@@FedericoDLP As far as that question goes, I have the right to remain silent, and I'm exercising that right.😐
Let’s face it, the difference of 38 to 40 seconds for the difference of £10k in the prize pot, should have gone for the £30k in my opinion
That extra chaser can make a lot of difference, though.
33% more jeopardy with an extra chaser, but 50% more reward.
Only 1 chaser can answer at once, so I wouldn’t even say 33% more jeopardy, as their knowledge bases will overlap a lot, so probably a lot less than 33% additional risk to add a chaser
@@Chrissaces1 Yeah I agree, and 2 seconds could be critical, but she still had a huge margin of safety.
I'd understand staying under a certain amount to duck a specific chaser, but that wasn't the case either. She underplayed her hand.
I've always loved watching Rachel on "Countdown". Obviously she's beautiful, but she's also quite brilliant. And here on "Chasers" she again proves it.
That was fun, thank you🎼🤘🏻
Rachel is a goddess!!!
Well done Rach...I had every confidence in you...Go girl.
She's so lovely! What a wonderful person!
I know this is a celebrity version … but that was so easy
Gosh....shes gorgeous and pretty with brains!! How rare is that!?
The celebrity version of this show is so funny to me - all the chasers working their hardest to keep money away from charity lol
Do you know what would of been funny if the 1st offer was 30 seconds
i got every question correct except for the coldest season. i couldve sworn the answer was ice salt?
Super easy questions for the most part, but still a thorough trouncing.
she is so amazing
she's a complete delight
the questions to the chasers seemed to take a lot longer to read out than Rachels, i doubt its been manipulated for charity purposes thats just my takeaway
Your takeaway is wrong.
The dark destroyer is wrong. Barclays Enfield cash machine was operational in 1966 - though Reg arney was the first person to be photographed using it the next year.
I’m honestly not sure that Beat The Chasers is any easier on the chasers, I’ve alw felt (as an observer) that going solo is easier bc you don’t waste time seeing if someone is gonna buzz in
She's very pretty
Congratulations to rachel for beating the chasers
Please More "Beat The Chasers" !!!
Seriously? What's the coldest season of the year?
You know she went to Oxford right? Not BBC-playschool
She was also on Catchphrase and showed herself to be smarter than the others.
yes but was was beaten by a twelve year old at maths how ironic
she was on the chase socceraid special season 9
Notice how at 4:23, Brad says "Correct answer is?" When he should've asked if 'c' WAS the correct answer. Could be that it's all pre-determined or that he just knew the answer since he's so old (sorry Bradley)
He said the right thing. Both questions fit
Seems like it worked as a disadvantage to the chaser’s to have three of them as you lose time waiting to see if a teammate will answer before guessing or passing.
She was genuinely nervous ❤
whay would you give them 38 seconds for 20k, and not take 40 seconds for 30k??
Because then you also have another chaser who could know the answers they didn’t so Brad wouldn’t have to ask them extra questions
@@waynehardy6955exactly Punk 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
WOW😇 she could definitely be a chaser!
I like Rachel lovely girl xx
I think it’s impossible not to love Rachel Riley, she such an amazing humble woman
Australia got em in 1977.i used one in 1988.
Guess why I watch countdown.
She's so lovely. I knew she could have gotten that extra 10k for an extra 2 seconds. That seemed worth the leap.
"which is the coldest season" seriously? 😂
Rachel Riley is such an adorable and classy person. Such a fantastic role model for our whole society. If only we could have more people like her amongst us.
And to think she's an Essex girl! Really broke the stereotype
So she got an MBE then started to spew nonsense on Twitter... Yikes.
Where's your MBE ? just go.
well done Girl
If Rachel was looking at the middle two values, 3 chasers made more sense. An entire extra chaser doesn't seem worth it for only a £10,000 increase and 2 extra seconds.
Only a 10k increase is 50% more, and only 33% more jeopardy adding another chaser. Even with the 2 second offset, mathematically 30k was the better option for risk and reward.
Yesssssss Rachel killed it
She's always been my free pass!
8:35 Her reaction. So wonderful.
She is brilliant. And adorable
She really should have taken the 30 grand offer. it's 10 grand more for only two seconds more time. Although she did get lucky with quite a few wrong answers from the Chasers that tipped the clocks in her favour.
If she wasn't a Tory, she would be a dream woman
The Right Side of the Bell Curve - the beautiful people.
What all beauty and no brain! 🤣
" that money will be great for the kids.. The charity kids" hmm.. 😂
Rachel Riley should be a Chaser
Rachel looks so different to when she was doing 8 out of 10 cats do countdown?
When that show started she was 25, now she's 38, it is the way of things
She’s aged, like everyone does
@@FarmerJABexactly Punk 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
She can do no wrong. Except dance. Other than that she's perfect in every single other possible way.
hey Rachel..do some work on the new holocaust in Gaza!!!!!
@gbxr1eg it was a spelling mistake as if you didn't know it.
What a Gem.
Extremely attractive and intelligent.
Brilliant lady.
Why is Rachel looking like Catherine Ryan here???😂😂😂😂
I’m confused why comments have been deleted. All the ones praising her
Stunning girl xxxx
If anyone could beat the chasers, Rachel Riley could.
is winter only the coldest season in the northern hemisphere???
?? No, winter happens outside the tropics and at opposite times of the year, the tropics just have a wet and dry season.
she was on the celebrity chase twice
Richel Raley on Cheat the Basers | 2420
BEAUTIFUL maid .....stunning
She won with 21 seconds on her clock just so she knows it is called “beat the chasers” not “intimate the chasers”
She's just the brightest ray of sunshine anywhere on Earth. Good onya, Rachel.
Reg Varmey before On The Buses?